• More of my philosophy about individual digital identity and individual

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 12 19:50:08 2022
    Hello,



    More of my philosophy about individual digital identity and individual identity..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person, and let me
    tell you that i am of the ones that value a lot digital identity,
    since i want my digital identity to be a honest person about my
    strenghts and about my being a gentleman, and you have to understand
    that i look like my thoughts of my philosophy or my poems of Love, and i
    am also thinking them and writing them really fast since i look like
    my thoughts that i am writing fast, also i have to be frank since i am
    also still in the process of inventing more and more thoughts of my
    philosophy , and i will soon organize all my thoughts of my philosophy
    as a beautiful digital book, also i will also soon do much more
    "business" with my kind of digital identity etc.

    More of my philosophy about the philosophy of Letting Go and more..

    I have just looked at the following video:

    Why Letting Go Is True Wealth | Minimalist Philosophy for Simple Living

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHcGmiZqKXo&t=78s

    I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,
    so i have just talked about stoicism and i am explaining why
    my philosophy is better than stoicism, and read my below thoughts
    about it, and now there remain the philosophy of Letting Go in the above
    video that i think comes also from China, but i think it has also a
    weakness as the below philosophy of the black guy below, so the weakness
    of the philosophy of Letting Go, is also like the same weakness of
    Buddhism, and it is that we are not "isolated" from people, so since we
    are living inside a society and interacting with people so then
    we are comparing our status etc. so we can be hurt, so we become less
    confident or more confident so then the Letting Go phillosophy
    is not realistic or pragmatic, since its way of doing is not so efficient.

    More of my philosophy about specialization and self-confidence and more..

    I think i am smart, and i have just looked at some videos of the
    following black guy that is creating motivational videos:

    TRUE DOG MENTALITY - The Most Motivational Video | David Goggins

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JMAgzKvlIY


    And i think that he is not talking so smartly, but i think he
    is wanting to become self-confidence by being "specialization",
    like the specialization in economy that is the process wherein a company
    or individual decides to focus their labor on a specific type of
    production and that enhances much more productivity, but i think that
    his views on his videos of how to be self-confidence are not so
    efficient, since i say that specialization alone is not sufficient,
    since i think that you have to know how to transcend this weakness by
    for example knowing how to a kind intellectual superiority that is
    creative in a kind sophisticated manner that brings self-confidence, and
    it is what i am doing by inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and my
    poems of Love and by inventing many scalable algorithms and algorithms
    and by inventing some powerful software tools etc. and here is my
    following two proverbs that show this kind of doing:

    Here is my new proverb:

    "Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that
    makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
    small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

    Here is my other new proverb:

    "When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
    that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
    way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
    is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
    by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by
    using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
    sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
    thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
    we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
    become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a
    small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
    is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also
    some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
    successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
    much more successful than successful."

    And read all my other new proverbs in the following web link:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


    Here is also one important proverb of mine about Resourcefulness that
    permits you to understand it:

    "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
    and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
    and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
    that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
    and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
    engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
    positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
    to easy the jobs for you."

    And now more of my philosophy about capitalism and about Marxism and
    communism and more..

    I invite you to look at the following video:

    Communist Professor Defends Stalin & Mao’s Legacy - Heated Debate

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iov6jyfKtRc


    So i have just looked at the above video and i will talk more about
    capitalism:

    I think the mistake is to call our system capitalism, since i think our
    system is not capitalism, since it requires also a kind of of Social
    Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs
    that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society
    in a kind of way, and read below my philosophy about Class Struggle
    so that to notice it, so i think that saying that USA is capitalism
    is not correct thinking, since capitalism only as a system is a stupid
    system, so this is why we can not compare as in the above video between capitalism and communism, so we need to take into account all the
    variables such as the kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity
    that we have inside for example the USA system so that to compare with communism, other than that i have also discussed more about the
    advantages of capitalism, you can read them in the following
    web link:

    And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
    read them here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc

    Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
    that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
    a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to
    have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the
    poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

    And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
    so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

    Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

    I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
    we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
    Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
    logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
    camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
    comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
    smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
    characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
    this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
    this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
    more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
    competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
    the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
    good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
    efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
    "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
    have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
    resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
    we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
    since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
    members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
    we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
    competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
    of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
    society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
    congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
    contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
    the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
    party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
    civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
    so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

    More of my philosophy of between nostalgia and hope and the how to be
    optimism and more..

    First i will give you the definition of "nostalgia", and here it is:

    "A sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically for
    a period or place with happy personal associations."


    So i think i will explain more my way of being happy and optimism:

    I think that it is from the power of the "mind" from where comes
    happpiness, since the mind can be "free" and much more powerful by using philosophical mechanisms, it is why i am inventing my poems of Love and
    my thoughts and mechanisms of my philosophy below etc. i also mean
    that happiness comes also from "nostalgia" in a form of an imaginary
    that you believe it is true even if it is not true, also nostalgia is
    not sufficient because you have to be a kind of hope and being a kind of positive energy that pushes you forward, so read my thoughts of my
    philosophy below about it, so i invite you to look at following video of
    a song, and notice in this video how the beautiful Mediterranean sea and
    its seashores are so beautiful and it is also giving me a happiness in a
    form of "nostalgia" since i come from there, so i think nostalgia is
    also powerful and a positive energy:

    Geri Halliwell - Mi Chico Latino

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgoKfHg1JsU&list=RDXgoKfHg1JsU&start_radio=1

    More of my philosophy about my new poem of Love and more..

    And now i will explain how i am inventing my new poem of Love:

    Here is my new poem of Love again:

    --
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since notice how our strong Love is not the war crime !
    Since it is like my poems of Love and there lovely rhymes !
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since is our beautiful Love just for the onetime ?
    Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime
    And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime
    And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since i will always Love you forever and for the anytime !
    Since our Love is not just a simple programming paradigm !
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!
    --

    I think i am smart and i am a gentleman type of person and i think
    i am a wise type of person and the way of how i am inventing
    my new poem of Love is the same way i am using so that
    to invent my poems of Love, so it is that i am inventing with my fluid intelligence like architectural idea or ideas in a form of smart pattern
    or patterns that guide(s) the rest of the construction of my poem of
    Love, so in my poem of Love above, look at its following architectural idea:

    "Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime
    And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime
    And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?"

    So i am "abstracting" sublime of Love as being a "sublime" and i am
    saying that the sublime of Love permits to strongly defy space-time,
    and notice how i am saying in the start of my poem of Love the following:

    "Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?"

    So notice that in the start of my poem of Love you will not understand
    clearly the why i am saying it, but when you read my above architectural
    idea and when you also read the following of my poem:

    "Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!"

    You will understand that i mean that the sublime of Love
    is "King" like the King of time that defies space-time ,
    so then this sublime of Love is not just for the onetime but it is for
    the forever and for the anytime and of course i am constructing
    beautifully the rest of my poem of Love as you are reading it.

    Here is my new poem of Love..

    I invite you to listen to the following song reading at
    the same time my new poem of Love below:

    Laura Pausini - La Solitudine (Official Video)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpOEN93LX-E


    Note that the word "sublime" in my new poem of Love below means:
    extremely good, beautiful, or enjoyable.

    And here is my new poem of Love:


    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?

    Since notice how our strong Love is not the war crime !

    Since it is like my poems of Love and there lovely rhymes !

    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?

    Since is our beautiful Love just for the onetime ?

    Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime

    And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime

    And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?

    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?

    Since i will always Love you forever and for the anytime !

    Since our Love is not just a simple programming paradigm !

    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?

    Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!


    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    ---


    More of my philosophy about the self and the human soul and more..

    I think i am smart and i think i am wise type of man,
    but i will ask another philosophical question of:

    What is the soul of a human ?

    I think that the soul of a human is related to the self-confidence
    and optimism and positive energy of a human, so the first important
    step is to ask what are the engines that gives a human a soul? since i
    think that if you are not self-confident and optimism, it is like your
    soul is dying, so in philosophy you need to have the "engines" that
    gives you a soul, the engines such as the philosophical mechanisms that
    i am talking about below, and as you notice it is not sufficient
    to have a soul, since you have to have a good soul and not an evil soul,
    so take for example the engine that we call "money", so i am smart and
    i will quickly say that so that to have much more money , you have for
    example to work hard, but since the working hard is also genetical and
    since you have also to be