There's no other choice. Destructive might speaks more loudly than a constructive one. Going around the world to build it up does not gain China any respect. Having the means to destroy it all, will. The Americans know this best. This is why theypossess the means to destroy the whole world more than once. That is why they will always want to be the only one who can do it.
China should not be fooled by the Americans again. The last time the Americans curtailed the growth of China's nuclear arsenal when it fooled China to stop all real nuclear tests by promising to pass China the technology of computer-simulated nucleartest. Little of those technology was passed to the Chinese. China's nuclear arsenal remained a fraction of America's.
The Chinese should not forget that the Americans' nuclear arsenal is many times larger than China's and yet the Americans have passed a law to allow their nation to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike against China. Besides, the Americans havenuclear-powered allies which will simultaneously mount a nuclear attack against China. One of them, India, is just next door to China.
Not only should the Chinese up their nuclear arsenal, they should work on weapons more destructive than the nuclear type. They should not forget that part of their history when they were occupied by foreign powers. That's only a short while ago in thespan of human history.
The future is becoming increasingly threatening to China. Mightiest US is treating China as an enemy and forming military alliances against China. It is encouraging the re-militarisation of Japan. Past Imperialist powers are on the rise again. If Chinais not careful, its humiliating past will return. Only being sufficiently armed with the most destructive weapons can prevent this from happening.
On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 7:38:53 PM UTC-8, wog wacker wrote:possess the means to destroy the whole world more than once. That is why they will always want to be the only one who can do it.
There's no other choice. Destructive might speaks more loudly than a constructive one. Going around the world to build it up does not gain China any respect. Having the means to destroy it all, will. The Americans know this best. This is why they
test. Little of those technology was passed to the Chinese. China's nuclear arsenal remained a fraction of America's.
China should not be fooled by the Americans again. The last time the Americans curtailed the growth of China's nuclear arsenal when it fooled China to stop all real nuclear tests by promising to pass China the technology of computer-simulated nuclear
nuclear-powered allies which will simultaneously mount a nuclear attack against China. One of them, India, is just next door to China.
The Chinese should not forget that the Americans' nuclear arsenal is many times larger than China's and yet the Americans have passed a law to allow their nation to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike against China. Besides, the Americans have
span of human history.
Not only should the Chinese up their nuclear arsenal, they should work on weapons more destructive than the nuclear type. They should not forget that part of their history when they were occupied by foreign powers. That's only a short while ago in the
China is not careful, its humiliating past will return. Only being sufficiently armed with the most destructive weapons can prevent this from happening.
The future is becoming increasingly threatening to China. Mightiest US is treating China as an enemy and forming military alliances against China. It is encouraging the re-militarisation of Japan. Past Imperialist powers are on the rise again. If
300 is more than enough.
No country can afford to have 300 cities destroyed...
On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 7:38:53 PM UTC-8, wog wacker wrote:possess the means to destroy the whole world more than once. That is why they will always want to be the only one who can do it.
There's no other choice. Destructive might speaks more loudly than a constructive one. Going around the world to build it up does not gain China any respect. Having the means to destroy it all, will. The Americans know this best. This is why they
test. Little of those technology was passed to the Chinese. China's nuclear arsenal remained a fraction of America's.China should not be fooled by the Americans again. The last time the Americans curtailed the growth of China's nuclear arsenal when it fooled China to stop all real nuclear tests by promising to pass China the technology of computer-simulated nuclear
nuclear-powered allies which will simultaneously mount a nuclear attack against China. One of them, India, is just next door to China.The Chinese should not forget that the Americans' nuclear arsenal is many times larger than China's and yet the Americans have passed a law to allow their nation to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike against China. Besides, the Americans have
the span of human history.Not only should the Chinese up their nuclear arsenal, they should work on weapons more destructive than the nuclear type. They should not forget that part of their history when they were occupied by foreign powers. That's only a short while ago in
China is not careful, its humiliating past will return. Only being sufficiently armed with the most destructive weapons can prevent this from happening.The future is becoming increasingly threatening to China. Mightiest US is treating China as an enemy and forming military alliances against China. It is encouraging the re-militarisation of Japan. Past Imperialist powers are on the rise again. If
300 is more than enough.
No country can afford to have 300 cities destroyed...
On 11/1/2022 2:05 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:possess the means to destroy the whole world more than once. That is why they will always want to be the only one who can do it.
On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 7:38:53 PM UTC-8, wog wacker wrote:
There's no other choice. Destructive might speaks more loudly than a constructive one. Going around the world to build it up does not gain China any respect. Having the means to destroy it all, will. The Americans know this best. This is why they
nuclear test. Little of those technology was passed to the Chinese. China's nuclear arsenal remained a fraction of America's.
China should not be fooled by the Americans again. The last time the Americans curtailed the growth of China's nuclear arsenal when it fooled China to stop all real nuclear tests by promising to pass China the technology of computer-simulated
nuclear-powered allies which will simultaneously mount a nuclear attack against China. One of them, India, is just next door to China.
The Chinese should not forget that the Americans' nuclear arsenal is many times larger than China's and yet the Americans have passed a law to allow their nation to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike against China. Besides, the Americans have
the span of human history.
Not only should the Chinese up their nuclear arsenal, they should work on weapons more destructive than the nuclear type. They should not forget that part of their history when they were occupied by foreign powers. That's only a short while ago in
China is not careful, its humiliating past will return. Only being sufficiently armed with the most destructive weapons can prevent this from happening.
The future is becoming increasingly threatening to China. Mightiest US is treating China as an enemy and forming military alliances against China. It is encouraging the re-militarisation of Japan. Past Imperialist powers are on the rise again. If
300 is more than enough.No, 350 is not enough as many is needed to fire simultaneously several targets at different locations, and if a target is not reached its
No country can afford to have 300 cities destroyed...
desired effect, a few more is needed, and if other countries are participating in surrounding you, more are need to reach all at the same time.
Remember, when war comes to your door by one or many countries, one must have plenty of ammo and plenty of bios and plenty of nuclear missiles
too. One must be caught not having enough of ammo, and not enough of missiles and not enough of transport carriers like ships, submarines, ground, and space as well.
Henceforth, the more the merrier is necessary. It is like one having a
lot of money stocked up in the bank whereby one can draw down readily to spend on any purchases to meet the shortages and replacements when in
the midst of the war engaged in it.
Remember, in war, never get oneself ended with no ammo, missiles,
bombs, weapons, tanks, ships, submarines, aircraft, and soldiers, too.
Remember also that war to threaten and frighten another country into war
is based on a number game.
That means one needs very high number of quality troops, and large
quantity and quality weapons such as missiles, tanks, radars, fighter
jets, and many other things, too.
In short, it is no disagreeable to you to say 350 is enough. US has 5500 ICBM and Russia has 6500 ICBM. Hence China should have 5000 in order to
be humble with them.
But Hypersonic missile should not be counted as it is different from
ICBM, as it is used like rocket fired in cartridges. Therefore, China
needs 2 million of hypersonic to be ready for war to win policy.
On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 6:05:34 PM UTC, rst88...@gmail.com wrote:possess the means to destroy the whole world more than once. That is why they will always want to be the only one who can do it.
On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 7:38:53 PM UTC-8, wog wacker wrote:
There's no other choice. Destructive might speaks more loudly than a constructive one. Going around the world to build it up does not gain China any respect. Having the means to destroy it all, will. The Americans know this best. This is why they
nuclear test. Little of those technology was passed to the Chinese. China's nuclear arsenal remained a fraction of America's.China should not be fooled by the Americans again. The last time the Americans curtailed the growth of China's nuclear arsenal when it fooled China to stop all real nuclear tests by promising to pass China the technology of computer-simulated
nuclear-powered allies which will simultaneously mount a nuclear attack against China. One of them, India, is just next door to China.The Chinese should not forget that the Americans' nuclear arsenal is many times larger than China's and yet the Americans have passed a law to allow their nation to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike against China. Besides, the Americans have
the span of human history.Not only should the Chinese up their nuclear arsenal, they should work on weapons more destructive than the nuclear type. They should not forget that part of their history when they were occupied by foreign powers. That's only a short while ago in
China is not careful, its humiliating past will return. Only being sufficiently armed with the most destructive weapons can prevent this from happening.The future is becoming increasingly threatening to China. Mightiest US is treating China as an enemy and forming military alliances against China. It is encouraging the re-militarisation of Japan. Past Imperialist powers are on the rise again. If
300 is more than enough.300 is enough against 6000 of the US? How many of the 300 can survive a preemptive nuclear strike by the US? How many of the remaining can penetrate the missile defense system of the US? Not to forget the nuclear-armed allies of the US.
No country can afford to have 300 cities destroyed...
300 is a pittance.
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 11:38:39 AM UTC-8, boro wrote:possess the means to destroy the whole world more than once. That is why they will always want to be the only one who can do it.
On 11/1/2022 2:05 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:
On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 7:38:53 PM UTC-8, wog wacker wrote:
There's no other choice. Destructive might speaks more loudly than a constructive one. Going around the world to build it up does not gain China any respect. Having the means to destroy it all, will. The Americans know this best. This is why they
nuclear test. Little of those technology was passed to the Chinese. China's nuclear arsenal remained a fraction of America's.
China should not be fooled by the Americans again. The last time the Americans curtailed the growth of China's nuclear arsenal when it fooled China to stop all real nuclear tests by promising to pass China the technology of computer-simulated
nuclear-powered allies which will simultaneously mount a nuclear attack against China. One of them, India, is just next door to China.
The Chinese should not forget that the Americans' nuclear arsenal is many times larger than China's and yet the Americans have passed a law to allow their nation to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike against China. Besides, the Americans have
the span of human history.
Not only should the Chinese up their nuclear arsenal, they should work on weapons more destructive than the nuclear type. They should not forget that part of their history when they were occupied by foreign powers. That's only a short while ago in
China is not careful, its humiliating past will return. Only being sufficiently armed with the most destructive weapons can prevent this from happening.
The future is becoming increasingly threatening to China. Mightiest US is treating China as an enemy and forming military alliances against China. It is encouraging the re-militarisation of Japan. Past Imperialist powers are on the rise again. If
More can standby. It can fly and fight at multiple enemies at the sameNo, 350 is not enough as many is needed to fire simultaneously several
300 is more than enough.
No country can afford to have 300 cities destroyed...
targets at different locations, and if a target is not reached its
desired effect, a few more is needed, and if other countries are
participating in surrounding you, more are need to reach all at the same
time.
Remember, when war comes to your door by one or many countries, one must
have plenty of ammo and plenty of bios and plenty of nuclear missiles
too. One must be caught not having enough of ammo, and not enough of
missiles and not enough of transport carriers like ships, submarines,
ground, and space as well.
Henceforth, the more the merrier is necessary. It is like one having a
lot of money stocked up in the bank whereby one can draw down readily to
spend on any purchases to meet the shortages and replacements when in
the midst of the war engaged in it.
Remember, in war, never get oneself ended with no ammo, missiles,
bombs, weapons, tanks, ships, submarines, aircraft, and soldiers, too.
Remember also that war to threaten and frighten another country into war
is based on a number game.
That means one needs very high number of quality troops, and large
quantity and quality weapons such as missiles, tanks, radars, fighter
jets, and many other things, too.
In short, it is no disagreeable to you to say 350 is enough. US has 5500
ICBM and Russia has 6500 ICBM. Hence China should have 5000 in order to
be humble with them.
But Hypersonic missile should not be counted as it is different from
ICBM, as it is used like rocket fired in cartridges. Therefore, China
needs 2 million of hypersonic to be ready for war to win policy.
You are comparing bullets to nuclear bombs...
There is no comparison...
A nuclear bomb kills hundreds of thousands, or millions...
A bullet may not even kill one.
China is a huge country, and China has been preparing for self-defense since the beginning of communism...
China has over 3 thousand miles of tunnels...
Where do you bomb over China? How do you know what you are bombing???
During the Vietnam War, American soldiers were standing on top of the mountain where Vietnamese soldiers were hiding...
In war, the innocence will be killed. The defenders will survive.
Yes, hypersonic missile is not bullet. More is better. More is power.
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 11:38:39 AM UTC-8, boro wrote:possess the means to destroy the whole world more than once. That is why they will always want to be the only one who can do it.
On 11/1/2022 2:05 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:
On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 7:38:53 PM UTC-8, wog wacker wrote:
There's no other choice. Destructive might speaks more loudly than a constructive one. Going around the world to build it up does not gain China any respect. Having the means to destroy it all, will. The Americans know this best. This is why they
nuclear test. Little of those technology was passed to the Chinese. China's nuclear arsenal remained a fraction of America's.
China should not be fooled by the Americans again. The last time the Americans curtailed the growth of China's nuclear arsenal when it fooled China to stop all real nuclear tests by promising to pass China the technology of computer-simulated
nuclear-powered allies which will simultaneously mount a nuclear attack against China. One of them, India, is just next door to China.
The Chinese should not forget that the Americans' nuclear arsenal is many times larger than China's and yet the Americans have passed a law to allow their nation to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike against China. Besides, the Americans have
the span of human history.
Not only should the Chinese up their nuclear arsenal, they should work on weapons more destructive than the nuclear type. They should not forget that part of their history when they were occupied by foreign powers. That's only a short while ago in
China is not careful, its humiliating past will return. Only being sufficiently armed with the most destructive weapons can prevent this from happening.
The future is becoming increasingly threatening to China. Mightiest US is treating China as an enemy and forming military alliances against China. It is encouraging the re-militarisation of Japan. Past Imperialist powers are on the rise again. If
300 is more than enough.No, 350 is not enough as many is needed to fire simultaneously several targets at different locations, and if a target is not reached its
No country can afford to have 300 cities destroyed...
desired effect, a few more is needed, and if other countries are participating in surrounding you, more are need to reach all at the same time.
Remember, when war comes to your door by one or many countries, one must have plenty of ammo and plenty of bios and plenty of nuclear missiles
too. One must be caught not having enough of ammo, and not enough of missiles and not enough of transport carriers like ships, submarines, ground, and space as well.
Henceforth, the more the merrier is necessary. It is like one having a
lot of money stocked up in the bank whereby one can draw down readily to spend on any purchases to meet the shortages and replacements when in
the midst of the war engaged in it.
Remember, in war, never get oneself ended with no ammo, missiles,
bombs, weapons, tanks, ships, submarines, aircraft, and soldiers, too.
Remember also that war to threaten and frighten another country into war is based on a number game.
That means one needs very high number of quality troops, and large quantity and quality weapons such as missiles, tanks, radars, fighter jets, and many other things, too.
In short, it is no disagreeable to you to say 350 is enough. US has 5500 ICBM and Russia has 6500 ICBM. Hence China should have 5000 in order to
be humble with them.
But Hypersonic missile should not be counted as it is different fromYou are comparing bullets to nuclear bombs...
ICBM, as it is used like rocket fired in cartridges. Therefore, China needs 2 million of hypersonic to be ready for war to win policy.
There is no comparison...
A nuclear bomb kills hundreds of thousands, or millions...
A bullet may not even kill one.
China is a huge country, and China has been preparing for self-defense since the beginning of communism...
China has over 3 thousand miles of tunnels...
Where do you bomb over China? How do you know what you are bombing???
During the Vietnam War, American soldiers were standing on top of the mountain where Vietnamese soldiers were hiding...
In war, the innocence will be killed. The defenders will survive.
China has over 3 thousand miles of tunnels...
Where do you bomb over China? How do you know what you are bombing???
During the Vietnam War, American soldiers were standing on top of the mountain where Vietnamese soldiers were hiding...
In war, the innocence will be killed. The defenders will survive.
On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 5:04:04 PM UTC, rst88...@gmail.com wrote:they possess the means to destroy the whole world more than once. That is why they will always want to be the only one who can do it.
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 11:38:39 AM UTC-8, boro wrote:
On 11/1/2022 2:05 am, Rusty Wyse wrote:
On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 7:38:53 PM UTC-8, wog wacker wrote:
There's no other choice. Destructive might speaks more loudly than a constructive one. Going around the world to build it up does not gain China any respect. Having the means to destroy it all, will. The Americans know this best. This is why
nuclear test. Little of those technology was passed to the Chinese. China's nuclear arsenal remained a fraction of America's.
China should not be fooled by the Americans again. The last time the Americans curtailed the growth of China's nuclear arsenal when it fooled China to stop all real nuclear tests by promising to pass China the technology of computer-simulated
nuclear-powered allies which will simultaneously mount a nuclear attack against China. One of them, India, is just next door to China.
The Chinese should not forget that the Americans' nuclear arsenal is many times larger than China's and yet the Americans have passed a law to allow their nation to carry out a preemptive nuclear strike against China. Besides, the Americans have
in the span of human history.
Not only should the Chinese up their nuclear arsenal, they should work on weapons more destructive than the nuclear type. They should not forget that part of their history when they were occupied by foreign powers. That's only a short while ago
If China is not careful, its humiliating past will return. Only being sufficiently armed with the most destructive weapons can prevent this from happening.
The future is becoming increasingly threatening to China. Mightiest US is treating China as an enemy and forming military alliances against China. It is encouraging the re-militarisation of Japan. Past Imperialist powers are on the rise again.
300 is more than enough.No, 350 is not enough as many is needed to fire simultaneously several targets at different locations, and if a target is not reached its desired effect, a few more is needed, and if other countries are participating in surrounding you, more are need to reach all at the same time.
No country can afford to have 300 cities destroyed...
Remember, when war comes to your door by one or many countries, one must have plenty of ammo and plenty of bios and plenty of nuclear missiles too. One must be caught not having enough of ammo, and not enough of missiles and not enough of transport carriers like ships, submarines, ground, and space as well.
Henceforth, the more the merrier is necessary. It is like one having a lot of money stocked up in the bank whereby one can draw down readily to spend on any purchases to meet the shortages and replacements when in the midst of the war engaged in it.
Remember, in war, never get oneself ended with no ammo, missiles,
bombs, weapons, tanks, ships, submarines, aircraft, and soldiers, too.
Remember also that war to threaten and frighten another country into war is based on a number game.
That means one needs very high number of quality troops, and large quantity and quality weapons such as missiles, tanks, radars, fighter jets, and many other things, too.
In short, it is no disagreeable to you to say 350 is enough. US has 5500 ICBM and Russia has 6500 ICBM. Hence China should have 5000 in order to be humble with them.
But Hypersonic missile should not be counted as it is different from ICBM, as it is used like rocket fired in cartridges. Therefore, China needs 2 million of hypersonic to be ready for war to win policy.You are comparing bullets to nuclear bombs...
There is no comparison...
A nuclear bomb kills hundreds of thousands, or millions...
A bullet may not even kill one.
China is a huge country, and China has been preparing for self-defense since the beginning of communism...
China has over 3 thousand miles of tunnels...
Where do you bomb over China? How do you know what you are bombing??? During the Vietnam War, American soldiers were standing on top of the mountain where Vietnamese soldiers were hiding...
In war, the innocence will be killed. The defenders will survive.
China has over 3 thousand miles of tunnels...There are enough satellites to pick up a launch, rocket or missiles, anywhere on earth. That 3000 miles of tunnel can't hide any missile launch.
Where do you bomb over China? How do you know what you are bombing???
During the Vietnam War, American soldiers were standing on top of the mountain where Vietnamese soldiers were hiding...Nowadays there are bombs which can penetrate deep into earth.
In war, the innocence will be killed. The defenders will survive.
Land-based missile faces the risk of being shot down and exploded within your own territory.
When it comes to weapons, there is never enough. Only if you can afford it.
Location, mobility and stealth are important attributes of modern weapons. The missiles must be located as close to enemies' territory as possible. They must be always on the move to reduce the chances of being destroyed. They have to be stealthyenough to avoid detection before and during attack.
China is the most populous nation on earth. It has the largest number of lives to defend. Logically, it should be the most defended nation. That means it should possess the largest number of most powerful weapons.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 13:28:46 |
| Calls: | 6,645 |
| Files: | 12,190 |
| Messages: | 5,326,843 |