• More of my philosophy about the banking system and more... (2/3)

    From World-News2100@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 29 11:25:05 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    jouer au malin dans la vie, mais pas dans le sens péjoratif comme je
    viens de l'expliquer ici avec même mon nouveau poème, lisez ici pour
    vous en rendre compte: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Ee1dxgUrhy0, but not
    only that, but i am like a super soldier that is highly smart, since i
    am inventing the "tools" that permit me to be much more smart and that
    permit me to adapt efficiently, so this is why you are seeing me
    inventing quickly my thoughts of my philosophy and i am posting it in
    front of you and you are seeing me inventing quickly my proverbs and
    posting them here and you are seeing me inventing quickly my poems of
    Love and and posting them here and i am inventing quickly my
    monotheistic religion and i am posting it here and i am "truthful" and
    "honest" in my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion, and this way of
    doing is like inventing quickly the much more sophisticated tools that
    permit you to be much more smart and that permit you to adapt
    efficiently, and i think that it is a sign of being a smart person and a
    wise type of person, and why i am considering myself as a wise type of
    person? since you can read how i am quickly talking to you in my below
    thoughts of my philosophy, and it is how i look like in real life, since
    i am like a wise type of person, also i have invented sophisticated
    software tools and i have invented many interesting software scalable algorithms and algorithms and i am still inventing interesting software scalable algorithms, and here is also what i have just said about it:

    More of my philosophy about the inventors and about algorithms and more..

    If you ask me the following question:

    What are you, Amine Moulay Ramdane, doing right now ?


    I will say that the most important thing that i am doing
    is that i have just today invented two software scalable
    algorithms that i think are breakthroughs, but i am not
    thinking too much about money since what i have done
    is that i have invented many software scalable algorithms
    and algorithms to better our humanity and our world, so as you notice
    that my personality is also that i am an "inventor" that have invented
    really interesting things. Also i am right now implementing some
    interesting software projects from the ground up with artificial
    intelligence, So i invite you to read all my following thoughts so that
    to know more about my personality:

    More of my philosophy about mathematics and the Minimizers that fit models..

    I have just read the following web pages about comparing Minimizers that
    fit models, and i invite you to read them here:

    https://docs.mantidproject.org/v3.7.1/concepts/FittingMinimizers.html

    And i am working with some software projects now that need good
    Minimizers that fit models, and i have implemented two of them with the
    simplex method and with Levenberg-Marquardt, but i am not satisfied
    since i think that the Simplex method is better in convergence than Levenberg-Marquardt since it rarely converges to a local minimum, but i
    will implement or build a minimizer from the ground up with artificial intelligence that fits Models and that is much more sophisticated and
    much more efficient than the Simplex or Levenberg-Marquardt, so stay
    tuned since i am actually implementing it !

    More about simulation and about prediction and more..

    So as you have just noticed that i just said that i have just
    invented two software scalable algorithms that i think are
    breakthroughs, but you have to know that one of them has needed from
    me to simulate it, so i have abstracted the real world behavior
    of one of this new scalable algorithms as a model that i have simulated
    by software and this has permitted me to "ensure" that this new scalable algorithm of mine, that i think is a breakthrough, is "reliable" and is
    working perfectly, also simulation in general also permits
    to not only ensure the "reliability" but also to "predict" the behavior
    of the real world systems.

    More of my philosophy about wealth and richness and capitalism and more..

    I invite you to look at the following video about the Ultra-Rich:

    Levels of Wealth: Inside The Secret Lives of The Ultra-Rich

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8d4uqQjk6o&t

    But as you have noticed i have also just quickly written about
    how you can be much more rich, so i invite you to read it in
    my following thoughts in the following web link, and you can look
    carefully at how i am talking quickly about how to invest for my or your retirement etc., so read my following thoughts so that to understand my
    way of doing it:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h4FblBWnNHk

    Also i have just corrected a typo below, since i have just written
    a word as "evolved", but i mean "involved", so i have just corrected
    this word in my below thoughts, so i invite you to read again my
    thoughts below so that to understand how i am quickly thinking and
    inventing and writing my thoughts of my philosophy so that to know much
    more about my kind of personality:

    More of my philosophy about the meaning and purpose of human life and more..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a philosopher, and now i will talk
    as a philosopher about from where comes the meaning and purpose of human
    life:

    I think the meaning and purpose of human life can not come from the
    morality of the master as have said the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche,
    since the morality of the master also has a weakness and a problem and
    it needs Democracy so that to avoid it or prevent it, and read about it
    in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich
    Nietzsche and about morality so that to understand it, so i think that
    the meaning and purpose of human life comes from morality that is like a "mixture" from a kind of Democracy that also permits to to avoid the
    above problem of the morality of the master and from a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs
    that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society
    in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that
    is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
    some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the
    poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such
    places as the congress and in Democracy, and read my following thoughts
    of my philosophy about Class Struggle so that to understand correctly
    from where i am logically inferring it, and the meaning and purpose of
    human life come also from the moving forward of morality with this
    better and better perfection and with a kind of positive energy that i
    am talking about as following:

    More of my philosophy of from where comes the positive human energy..

    I think i am a wise type of person, and i will say that the positive
    energy that makes us be a much better world comes from the way you are
    moving, so you have to be careful about the way you are moving, so i
    think that the efficient way of moving is that you have to make
    your personality better and better by making or constructing better and
    better things, and i think that it is the best positive energy that
    makes us be a much better world, it is why i am talking as i am talking
    so that to make you better "adapt" and be better and better humans, and
    this is why i have also invented the following proverb that abstract
    much more correctly this way of doing by positive energy, here it is:

    And here is my new proverb in french and english:

    "When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
    path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
    flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
    have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
    life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
    through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
    learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
    think this conception of life makes you more positive."

    "Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
    dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
    chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
    plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
    d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
    ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
    et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
    utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

    So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
    trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
    and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
    even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
    life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
    the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
    global world.

    More of my philosophy about the study that reveals the Richest people
    are never the most talented and more..

    I invite you to read the following interesting article:

    A 40-Year Scientific Study Reveals the Richest People Are Never the Most Talented (and Why That's a Really Good Thing)Yep: The smartest, most
    talented people almost never reach the highest peaks of success.

    Read more here:

    https://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/a-40-year-scientific-study-reveals-richest-people-are-never-most-talented-and-why-thats-a-really-good-thing.html

    So as you have just noticed by reading the above interesting article
    that a 40-Year scientific study reveals the Richest people are never the
    most talented, but it says more precisely that intelligence, skill, and
    hard work will certainly get you far in richness and success, but the
    most successful people are never the most talented, since an element of
    luck is involved, and this element of luck is mostly seizing a "lucky" opportunity, like being at the right place at the right time, meeting
    the right person, reacting to an opportunity in the right way.

    More of my philosophy about capitalism and about the rich and more..

    I invite you to look at the following french video that is
    talking about capitalism and the rich:

    Deviens riche ! | Streetphilosophy | ARTE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4I5bFIK6Go

    I think i am smart, and i have just looked at the above video,
    and i think that the women in the above video is not talking correctly,
    since she is saying that when a person possess billions of dollars, in a
    world where many people struggle because they do not have much money, it
    is an immoral person, and she is talking like the following article,
    so i invite you to read it:

    It’s basically just immoral to be rich

    https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/06/its-basically-just-immoral-to-be-rich

    So now i will answer this philosophical question, so i think the
    defects of the above article is that he is wanting to manage money
    and wealth of the rich by much more equalizing in a society, but i think
    that it is not the correct way, since you can understand capitalism by
    looking at for example the Financial sector, so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity that brings "resilience" and
    that needs a good allocation of resources in capitalism by reading my
    following thoughts:

    The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
    in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
    start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
    a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
    start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
    the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
    create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
    advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
    good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
    know what is the problem with finance, and here it is

    So then you are understanding from the above that capitalism needs
    a good allocation of resources, since efficiency also says that giving
    much more money or making rich the talented people that want to
    efficiently invest in projects an ideas such as in capitalism is also an efficient allocation of resources, since also the talented people know
    how to efficiently distribute again and invest again efficiently there
    big money and richness in other projects and good ideas, so capitalism
    brings this kind of efficiency, so then this means that it is not
    correct to say that when a person possess billions of dollars, in a
    world where many people struggle because they do not have much money, it
    is an immoral person, since saying so is also extremism and archaism of
    Class Struggle, and talking about Class Struggle here is my thoughts
    about Class Struggle:

    And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
    so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

    Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

    I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
    we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
    Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
    logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
    camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
    comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
    smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
    characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
    this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
    this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
    more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
    competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
    the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
    good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
    efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
    "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
    have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
    resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
    we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
    since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
    members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
    we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
    competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
    of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
    society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
    congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
    contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
    the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
    party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
    civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
    so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions. And of
    course i have also just invented quickly a proverb and a poem so that to
    make you understand this way of doing, and here they are:

    More of my philosophy about my new proverb about Democracy and more..

    As you have just noticed, i have just invented a proverb about
    Democracy, read it below and read all my other proverbs below, and as
    you notice in this new proverb that i am saying:

    "Since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to
    bring good sageness and good soundness"

    So this "better and better discuss" means that it is "inherent" to it
    that we have to also be well educated and that it needs Elitism, and as
    you are noticing in my new proverb that i am saying that Democracy needs Elitism that is existence of an elite as a dominating element in a
    system or society such as congressmen and congresswomen of the USA
    congress. So i invite you to read my new proverb and all my following
    thoughts so that to understand:

    Here is my new proverb:

    "The basis of Democracy is not that people have to govern, since it is inferiority of Democracy, since the basis of Democracy is to better and
    better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness, and
    after bringing this good sageness and good soundness, we can govern
    correctly with this good sageness and good soundness, this is why
    Democracy needs Elitism such as the congressmen and congresswomen of the
    USA congress so that to bring good sageness and good soundness."

    And of course you can read my just new poem below that also speaks
    about the basis of Democracy:

    And read my other new proverbs below that i have written quickly..

    Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
    my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable
    amount of natural light.


    So here is my new poem:

    ---
    Darkness for me is not madness

    Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness

    Darkness for me is not madness

    Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas

    Darkness for me is not madness

    Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress

    Darkness for me is not madness

    Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss

    Darkness for me is not madness

    Since the better discuss is not loneliness and is not being novice

    Darkness for me is not madness

    Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess

    Darkness for me is not madness

    Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness
    ---

    More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

    I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

    Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg

    I will ask a philosophical question of:

    Do