Hello,



More of my philosophy about capitalism and about the rich and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I invite you to look at the following french video that is
talking about capitalism and the rich:

Deviens riche ! | Streetphilosophy | ARTE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4I5bFIK6Go

I think i am smart, and i have just looked at the above video,
and i think that the women in the above video is not talking correctly,
since she is saying that when a person possess billions of dollars, in a
world where many people struggle because they do not have much money, it
is an immoral person, and she is talking like the following article,
so i invite you to read it:

It’s basically just immoral to be rich

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/06/its-basically-just-immoral-to-be-rich

So now i will answer this philosophical question, so i think the
defects of the above article is that he is wanting to manage money
and wealth of the rich by much more equalizing in a society, but i think
that it is not the correct way, since you can understand capitalism by
looking at for example the Financial sector, so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity that brings "resilience" and
that needs a good allocation of resources in capitalism by reading my
following thoughts:

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
know what is the problem with finance, and here it is

So then you are understanding from the above that capitalism needs
a good allocation of resources, since efficiency also says that giving
much more money or making rich the talented people such as in capitalism
is also an efficient allocation of resources, since the talented people
know how to efficiently distribute again and invest again efficiently
there big money and richness in other projects and good ideas, so
capitalism brings this kind of efficiency, so then this means that it is
not correct to say that when a person possess billions of dollars, in a
world where many people struggle because they do not have much money, it
is an immoral person, since saying so is also extremism and archaism of
Class Struggle, and talking about Class Struggle here is my thoughts
about Class Struggle:


And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart
or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance"
to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have
to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also
a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will
say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society
is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social
Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind
of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the
poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such
places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other
antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under
Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside
a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have
to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist
contradictions. And of course i have also just invented quickly a
proverb and a poem so that to make you understand this way of doing, and
here they are:

More of my philosophy about my new proverb about Democracy and more..

As you have just noticed, i have just invented a proverb about
Democracy, read it below and read all my other proverbs below, and as
you notice in this new proverb that i am saying:

"Since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to
bring good sageness and good soundness"

So this "better and better discuss" means that it is "inherent" to it
that we have to also be well educated and that it needs Elitism, and as
you are noticing in my new proverb that i am saying that Democracy needs Elitism that is existence of an elite as a dominating element in a
system or society such as congressmen and congresswomen of the USA
congress. So i invite you to read my new proverb and all my following
thoughts so that to understand:

Here is my new proverb:

"The basis of Democracy is not that people have to govern, since it is inferiority of Democracy, since the basis of Democracy is to better and
better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness, and
after bringing this good sageness and good soundness, we can govern
correctly with this good sageness and good soundness, this is why
Democracy needs Elitism such as the congressmen and congresswomen of the
USA congress so that to bring good sageness and good soundness."

And of course you can read my just new poem below that also speaks
about the basis of Democracy:

And read my other new proverbs below that i have written quickly..

Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable
amount of natural light.


So here is my new poem:

---
Darkness for me is not madness

Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss is not loneliness and is not being novice

Darkness for me is not madness

Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness
---



More of my philosophy about faith and God and why to believe in God..

So i will invite you to look at the following video that i have
just looked at about the Why Believe in God?

Why Believe in God? | Episode 1103 | Closer To Truth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFJ_Yeb_2RY


So i wi