• =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOaWsOWKoOWdoSAoU0lOR0FQT1JFKQ==?= (3/3)

    From frodo sam0@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Thu Nov 4 00:42:46 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    “It is true that everywhere we go,we will see these PRCs. There are a few people around me who say that we are going to be a little China soon. This is what the Singaporean minority groups are afraid of and we will be treated like second-hands.”

    This is so anti-Chinese and anti-China. How can you “see” a PRC or Chinese? East Asians like Chinese, Koreans and Japs, South-East Asians like Vietnamese, they all look alike.
    Those who have grown up in Singapore since its independence will know the obvious change in the nation’s population - there are now many more non-Chinese, especially Indians.
    Those who are worried about there being more PRC or Chinese are just being racists. They would like to see more of their own kind instead.


    Throwing doubt at a PRC-converted Singaporean.
    One PRC-converted Singaporean was quoted as saying:
    “I think it would still be good to keep some boundaries.
    Somethings I choose to do my way. Singaporeans can do things their own way, but I hope they don’t try to convert me into a Singaporean in all ways.”

    For that she was accused of not being genuine and sincere enough to be a Singaporean, by that chest thumping thamby, who said:
    “That’s the biggest problem you see when it comes to immigration.
    When immigrants come in with this mindset because Singaporeans can feel it if you’re genuine and you’re sincere and you want to know about the people in the country.”

    If only that stupid Indian guy can think as he thumped his chest. There’s nothing wrong in what she said. It’s true for all Singaporeans, newly converted citizens or not. Singapore is a multi-racial and multi-religious nation. There are so many
    boundaries, barriers and taboos between the various races and religions. Must a newly-converted Singaporean carry the stink of an Indian, wash their arse with their hands like the Malays and eat only halal food like the Muslims before he/she can be
    considered a genuine and sincere Singaporean? Not even a born-and-bred Singaporean would be like that.

    What prompted the PRC-converted citizen to say what she said? She was answering a question. The question was not revealed. The same question should be posed to converted citizens of other countries/races for their answers. But it’s not. Cunning
    racism.


    Sports for unity and patriotism.
    How stupid. Those flag-waving and roaring in a football stadium do not constitute patriotism. They are all for fun and entertainment only. If these people were to ask to suffer and sacrifice for Singapore, they would scoot off without a trace.

    Even in the realm of sports, the anti-Chinese racism of the racial minorities is blatant. All those foreign footballers whom they adored as heroes were non-Chinese. They had contributed little to the international reputation of Singapore. They were
    only well-known locally. In Malaysia, there’s the term ‘Jaguh Kampong’, i.e., Kampong Champ. In Singapore, those footballers were only ‘Jaguh Bandar’ i.e., City Champ. Out of Singapore, they are nothing.

    PRC Chinese, those who are PR or have converted to Singaporeans, have won honors for Singapore in international arenas, all the way to the Olympics, in the games of badminton and table-tennis. Their contributions to Singapore are much more than those
    footballers. Yet their efforts and sacrifices were not recognised. Instead, they were criticised frequently by the racial minorities, with their loyalties to SG being questioned. They were demoralised and have mostly left. And so have Singapore’s
    achievements in international badminton and table-tennis. That’s what anti-Chinese racism has caused to Singapore in sports.



    Foreign workers.
    Mostly from South Asia and mostly Indians. Because of that, their welfare is the concern of Singaporean Indians. Food, clothing and accommodation, only the best of these for them will do. Local Indian lawyers will fight for their legal rights. They
    would be ensured of the highest compensation over the slightest injuries so much so that many of them began to feign injuries or purposely injure themselves.
    Now in the Straits Times, there is the concern about their recruitment through middlemen. Indian middlemen make a big cut for their recruitment fee for Indians to work in SG. Now the SG authority is expected to help cut this out so that it will be
    financially easier for Indians to come to work in SG.
    If these foreign workers were mostly Chinese, the treatment will be very different. The racial minorities will be barking and howling for their evictions and return to China. That’s how racist are the racial minorities of SG.


    English- and Singlish-speaking
    Racial minorities only complain about non-English-speaking PRC Chinese, e.g. bus conductors but not a word about those foreign workers who mostly don’t speak a word of English.
    Singlish is only for fun and entertainment. That’s why it is used in comedy. It should not be a part of a Singaporean Identity. It will make Singapore a nation of country bumpkins.


    Luke Lu.
    This guy appears in the video for a good reason. He’s a champion of the English language in SG. While he was doing his postgraduate studies in Cambridge, UK, he wrote articles to the ST proudly claiming English to be his mother-tongue. In response,
    one local guy suggested that he proclaimed it to his lecturers and fellow students in Cambridge and report back their reactions. That stopped the issue. We know what happened. He had been ridiculed as a well-colonised WOG or something along that line.
    That is the stark reality. We can use English for its economic value. The rest of the world can understand that. Claiming more than that will earn ridicules and even despises, from the rest of the world. This is especially true for a Chinese Singaporean.
    While overseas, Singaporean Chinese are recognised for their ethnicity rather than nationality. Through him/her, people are interested to know more about that 5000 years of Chinese civilisation, its culture and history.



    The two videos are examples of crooked, crafty and cunning anti-Chinese racism, pure and simple. What gives those racists the temerity to do it? How can those involved be allowed to get away with it? It’s a piss of Indian racism by Indian-dominated
    English-language media CNA, which is becoming Channel News Aneh. For a long time now, Singapore’s English language media has been dominated by the Indians. It’s the media of Indian racism.


    It’s time for the Indian-dominated English language media to stop all these nonsense. Those bastards and bitches among the racial minorities know better than anyone else that they themselves are as racist as any Chinese they accuse of racism against
    them.


    The nation is now facing devastation by a coronavirus. Though it originated from India and is carried over to SG by Indians, it infects and kills all Singaporeans, equally, "regardless of race, language or religion". Perhaps that's the way we will all
    become equal, i.e., dead.
    It’s a holiday in SG today because it’s Deepavali, an Indian festive of light.

    Through the festivals of mutli-racial and multi-religious SG, one can know the racism of the racial minority against the racial majority Chinese.

    At the moment, the country is running short of electricity. Yet no Indian would suggest turning off the decorative lights in Little India or in Indian homes. But racists among the racial minorities in the media have managed to make Chinese wear black
    instead of red, during Chinese New Year (CNY).

    Christians just celebrated its ghostly festival of Halloween. No Malay- Muslims have complained that ghostly decorations put up to celebrate Halloween is haram. Yet they complained on religious ground when McDonald handed out toys of pigs during CNY.

    SG no more celebrates the last day of CNY, Chap Goh Mae, publicly. Years ago, racists from the racial minorities, through the media, had complained that the festival was dangerous and wasteful, providing unconvincing evidence to back it up.

    Yet Indians in SG are celebrating more and more festive occasions publicly, some of which are irrelevant to Singapore. Panga, a festival celebrating good harvest in India, is being celebrated in SG.

    Now you have seen how anti-Chinese racists are the racial minorities in Chinese-majority SG.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Mon Nov 15 17:07:06 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    Why no Chinese has been invited to speak of the racism they have experienced from the racial minorities? There are at least three serious cases with videos to support them.

    1. Malay man spat repeatedly at Chinese woman at a bus station. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfI_l2DpGsE
    2. Indian man spew profanities lasting minutes at Chinese at a food outlet.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E3z7mPVReQ
    3. Indian woman assaulted Chinese woman in a shop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyNOq9vUbd4

    Has anyone from the racial minorities been treated as badly by anyone from the Chinese majority? These were major racial incidents which should have created waves but they were played down, only briefly reported in the media. In contrast, Chinese who
    are accused of being racists over the slightest incidents are widely reported, exposed and criticised. They are harshly punished by the law, lose their jobs and livelihoods and become patients in IMH.


    PRC and Chinese
    “It is true that everywhere we go,we will see these PRCs. There are a few people around me who say that we are going to be a little China soon. This is what the Singaporean minority groups are afraid of and we will be treated like second-hands.”

    This is so anti-Chinese and anti-China. How can you “see” a PRC or Chinese? East Asians like Chinese, Koreans and Japs, South-East Asians like Vietnamese, they all look alike.
    Those who have grown up in Singapore since its independence will know the obvious change in the nation’s population - there are now many more non-Chinese, especially Indians.
    Those who are worried about there being more PRC or Chinese are just being racists. They would like to see more of their own kind instead.


    Throwing doubt at a PRC-converted Singaporean.
    One PRC-converted Singaporean was quoted as saying:
    “I think it would still be good to keep some boundaries.
    Somethings I choose to do my way. Singaporeans can do things their own way, but I hope they don’t try to convert me into a Singaporean in all ways.”

    For that she was accused of not being genuine and sincere enough to be a Singaporean, by that chest thumping thamby, who said:
    “That’s the biggest problem you see when it comes to immigration.
    When immigrants come in with this mindset because Singaporeans can feel it if you’re genuine and you’re sincere and you want to know about the people in the country.”

    If only that stupid Indian guy can think as he thumped his chest. There’s nothing wrong in what she said. It’s true for all Singaporeans, newly converted citizens or not. Singapore is a multi-racial and multi-religious nation. There are so many
    boundaries, barriers and taboos between the various races and religions. Must a newly-converted Singaporean carry the stink of an Indian, wash their arse with their hands like the Malays and eat only halal food like the Muslims before he/she can be
    considered a genuine and sincere Singaporean? Not even a born-and-bred Singaporean would be like that.

    What prompted the PRC-converted citizen to say what she said? She was answering a question. The question was not revealed. The same question should be posed to converted citizens of other countries/races for their answers. But it’s not. Cunning
    racism.


    Sports for unity and patriotism.
    How stupid. Those flag-waving and roaring in a football stadium do not constitute patriotism. They are all for fun and entertainment only. If these people were to ask to suffer and sacrifice for Singapore, they would scoot off without a trace.

    Even in the realm of sports, the anti-Chinese racism of the racial minorities is blatant. All those foreign footballers whom they adored as heroes were non-Chinese. They had contributed little to the international reputation of Singapore. They were
    only well-known locally. In Malaysia, there’s the term ‘Jaguh Kampong’, i.e., Kampong Champ. In Singapore, those footballers were only ‘Jaguh Bandar’ i.e., City Champ. Out of Singapore, they are nothing.

    PRC Chinese, those who are PR or have converted to Singaporeans, have won honors for Singapore in international arenas, all the way to the Olympics, in the games of badminton and table-tennis. Their contributions to Singapore are much more than those
    footballers. Yet their efforts and sacrifices were not recognised. Instead, they were criticised frequently by the racial minorities, with their loyalties to SG being questioned. They were demoralised and have mostly left. And so have Singapore’s
    achievements in international badminton and table-tennis. That’s what anti-Chinese racism has caused to Singapore in sports.



    Foreign workers.
    Mostly from South Asia and mostly Indians. Because of that, their welfare is the concern of Singaporean Indians. Food, clothing and accommodation, only the best of these for them will do. Local Indian lawyers will fight for their legal rights. They
    would be ensured of the highest compensation over the slightest injuries so much so that many of them began to feign injuries or purposely injure themselves.
    Now in the Straits Times, there is the concern about their recruitment through middlemen. Indian middlemen make a big cut for their recruitment fee for Indians to work in SG. Now the SG authority is expected to help cut this out so that it will be
    financially easier for Indians to come to work in SG.
    If these foreign workers were mostly Chinese, the treatment will be very different. The racial minorities will be barking and howling for their evictions and return to China. That’s how racist are the racial minorities of SG.


    English- and Singlish-speaking
    Racial minorities only complain about non-English-speaking PRC Chinese, e.g. bus conductors but not a word about those foreign workers who mostly don’t speak a word of English.
    Singlish is only for fun and entertainment. That’s why it is used in comedy. It should not be a part of a Singaporean Identity. It will make Singapore a nation of country bumpkins.


    Luke Lu.
    This guy appears in the video for a good reason. He’s a champion of the English language in SG. While he was doing his postgraduate studies in Cambridge, UK, he wrote articles to the ST proudly claiming English to be his mother-tongue. In response,
    one local guy suggested that he proclaimed it to his lecturers and fellow students in Cambridge and report back their reactions. That stopped the issue. We know what happened. He had been ridiculed as a well-colonised WOG or something along that line.
    That is the stark reality. We can use English for its economic value. The rest of the world can understand that. Claiming more than that will earn ridicules and even despises, from the rest of the world. This is especially true for a Chinese Singaporean.
    While overseas, Singaporean Chinese are recognised for their ethnicity rather than nationality. Through him/her, people are interested to know more about that 5000 years of Chinese civilisation, its culture and history.



    The two videos are examples of crooked, crafty and cunning anti-Chinese racism, pure and simple. What gives those racists the temerity to do it? How can those involved be allowed to get away with it? It’s a piss of Indian racism by Indian-dominated
    English-language media CNA, which is becoming Channel News Aneh. For a long time now, Singapore’s English language media has been dominated by the Indians. It’s the media of Indian racism.


    It’s time for the Indian-dominated English language media to stop all these nonsense. Those bastards and bitches among the racial minorities know better than anyone else that they themselves are as racist as any Chinese they accuse of racism
    against them.


    The nation is now facing devastation by a coronavirus. Though it originated from India and is carried over to SG by Indians, it infects and kills all Singaporeans, equally, "regardless of race, language or religion". Perhaps that's the way we will
    all become equal, i.e., dead.
    Shanmugam and his FICA.

    He has China and Chinese in his mind, his phobia about Chinese Singaporeans being used to spy for China. He referred to the case of Huang Jing. Up till today, ordinary Singaporeans don’t know what exactly has he done. Of bigger concern to Shanguman
    is China interfering in the affairs of Singapore to promote and defend the interest of the Chinese majority here. Some years back, there was the case of a Singapore diplomat objecting to the Chinese Ambassador’s action in KL, Malaysia. He interpreted
    the Ambassador’s friendly act as one interfering in Malaysia’s affairs.

    https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/amid-rise-identity-politics-sporeans-need-beware-foreign-manipulation-bilahari-kausikan


    Someone gave a robust reply to the above article, pointing out how much India cultivates the Indian diaspora to benefit India. That’s the racist attitude of the racial minorities. While they raise concern about the threat of China to Singapore,they
    themselves would wish for their ancestor nations to be powerful enough to come to their aid, when they need it.


    The truth is that it is much more likely for India to interfere in Singapore’s affair on behalf of the ethnic Indians. The following are the reasons.

    1. Leaders from nations in South-east Asia which have substantial proportion of ethnic Chinese in they population, Singapore included, have persuaded and pushed leaders in China to make statements on Overseas Chinese to the following effects.

    a. Overseas Chinese are citizens of their respective nations.
    b. They should be loyal to their nations.
    c. China would have no political links with Overseas Chinese. They would have to solve problems they face within their own nations by themselves.

    There has never been such commitment from India. Singapore has made no attempt to extract a single statement of a similar nature from past and present governments of India. This is a grave mistake in our foreign policy which should not be left
    uncorrected. It’s becoming more urgent as India grows stronger and more Indians choose to settle in Singapore.



    2. Every January, India celebrates Pravasi Bharatiya Divas which in English means Overseas India Day. Overseas India refers to anywhere in the world where there are ethnic Indians. India refers to them as People of Indian Origin (PIO). On this day, PIO
    s all over the world are expected to refresh their remembrance of their ancestor land, promote India to the world and commit themselves to contribute to the progress of their Mother India.

    Indian Singaporeans do respond to the call. One case from Singapore.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html

    If that were to be a case about Singaporean Chinese and China, Indians like Shanmugam would go hysterical about China interfering in the affairs of Singapore.

    a. By proclaiming places where there are PIO’s as Overseas India, India is making territorial claim in nations around the world where there are Indians. This is naked expansionism.

    b. This is an outright interference by India of those nations which have ethnic Indians among their population, Singapore included.


    3. India’s ever increasing population.
    India has failed to control its population growth. Despite being only about a third the size of China in territory, India’s population is going to surpass that of China and will continue to grow after that, with no end in sight. It was correctly
    predicted that the seven-billionth human would be an Indian. So too would be the eight-, nine-billionth and more billions beyond these.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIZyHMUGdq0

    With Indians continuing to mate and breed like pests, resulting in a runaway population growth, India has no choice but to seek territorial expansion. Already, Sikkim, and more recently Kashmir, has fallen victims to Indian expansionism. Its remaining
    close neighbors are wary of India. Under current US geopolitical strategy, India is USs’ strategic partner. It is a member of the QUAD, a grouping of US, India, Japan and Australia, covering the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, so called Indo-
    Pacific, allowing India’s naval power to extend to the Pacific. With such geopolitical blessings, the temptations for India to expand grows stronger. Beyond South Asia, nations in South-east Asia would be easy target for India’s expansionism. The
    tiniest among them, Singapore, would be easiest target.


    India, rather than China, is the existential threat that Singapore faces. The Indian invasion of Singapore has been ongoing, albeit peacefully. Singapore is being flooded with Indians entering it through legal means, with the assistance of Indian
    lawyers. Right now it’s a peaceful invasion. Later on it will be full military invasion and colonisation.


    Indians like Shanmugam will be selectively blind to the Indian threat while skillfully espousing the Chinese threat, a typical Indian cunning act. Shanmugam’s FICA is just another of his Fucking Indian Cunning Act.

    Listen to this. Make a copy before it is taken out of circulation.

    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny


    Indian Singaporeans like to complain against the majority Chinese Singaporeans, accusing the Chinese of racism over any little issue. Worse is that they are suspicious of China interfering in the affairs of Singapore and readily accuse the Chinese of
    having loyalty to China and spying for China. To counter these, Ethnic Indian Minister of Home Affairs, Shanmugam, recently enacted and passed a Foreign Interference (Countermeasure) Act in Parliament.

    Now we have two Indian Singaporeans discussing how India and Indians will takeover the world.

    The gist of their conversation is this. India’s population growth is out of control and Indians are migrating massively to many parts of the world, causing the Indian Diaspora to grow incessantly.

    What does this mean for the world? No one can put it more succinctly than Dr. Parag Khanna himself. With much pride, he says:

    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”,

    referring to the average skin color of Indians.


    This is stark Indian Racism. It’s time for people around the world to wake up to this. They are facing a future threat of Indianisation. The future for the rest of the world is this – being flooded and overwhelmed by Indians.

    Singapore, being a tiny nation, will be the first to be affected by this Indian Global Racism. Already, its happening. Indians population in Singapore has been increasing for decades. Indians here use whatever means, positions or power they have to
    support and promote Indians migration to Singapore.

    A few examples.
    Singaporeans Chinese are not breeding enough, causing Chinese population to shrink. Solution? Bring in more Indians.
    Singaporeans shun menial labor works. Solution? Bring in more Indians. Singapore is short of talents. Solution? Bring in more Indians.


    Singapore government should have a good grasp on the subject of India, Indian migration and the Indian diaspora. It should now seriously review its CECA with India, making sure there is no loopholes which allow mass migration of Indians to Singapore.


    Let’s see how Shanmugam will use FICA now. These two Indian Singaporeans are discussing how India and Indians will take over the whole world, which includes Singapore, of course. If FICA is not used to deal with them, Shanmugam should shut up and shaft
    FICA up his arse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gerard jud@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Thu Nov 18 05:55:39 2021
    [continued from previous message]


    The survey results are being used in a report titled Making Identity Count In Singapore: Understanding Singaporeans' National Pride And Identity.

    Why should Singaporeans national pride be in doubt because of their objections to CECA with India? On the contrary, its because they love their country that they are against it. They see what the Agreement has done to their country, flooding it
    with Indians.

    Do something to CECA with India. That’s the problem, not the poor and lowly educated in Singapore.
    Watch these two video from CNA, titled Pride Over Prejudice.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKLANK0n1iU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5loOMUWPyE



    Going by the number of participants, one would think that the Chinese form a minority in SG. There’s this unshaven, fierce looking Indian. In another CNA serial, he was thumping his chest proclaiming “This land is mine”. When he says it, he
    means Singapore has become part of India. Watch out for him. He will have more appearances. Indians think they have found a hero in him.


    Let’s go through some points raised in the videos and delve into their details a bit.


    Non-Chinese being the victims of Chinese racism.
    Racism exist between all races. No one race is only the victim, no one race is only the perpetrator. Non-Chinese should know how racists they themselves are toward Chinese.
    Why no Chinese has been invited to speak of the racism they have experienced from the racial minorities? There are at least three serious cases with videos to support them.

    1. Malay man spat repeatedly at Chinese woman at a bus station. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfI_l2DpGsE
    2. Indian man spew profanities lasting minutes at Chinese at a food outlet.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E3z7mPVReQ
    3. Indian woman assaulted Chinese woman in a shop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyNOq9vUbd4

    Has anyone from the racial minorities been treated as badly by anyone from the Chinese majority? These were major racial incidents which should have created waves but they were played down, only briefly reported in the media. In contrast, Chinese
    who are accused of being racists over the slightest incidents are widely reported, exposed and criticised. They are harshly punished by the law, lose their jobs and livelihoods and become patients in IMH.


    PRC and Chinese
    “It is true that everywhere we go,we will see these PRCs. There are a few people around me who say that we are going to be a little China soon. This is what the Singaporean minority groups are afraid of and we will be treated like second-hands.”


    This is so anti-Chinese and anti-China. How can you “see” a PRC or Chinese? East Asians like Chinese, Koreans and Japs, South-East Asians like Vietnamese, they all look alike.
    Those who have grown up in Singapore since its independence will know the obvious change in the nation’s population - there are now many more non-Chinese, especially Indians.
    Those who are worried about there being more PRC or Chinese are just being racists. They would like to see more of their own kind instead.


    Throwing doubt at a PRC-converted Singaporean.
    One PRC-converted Singaporean was quoted as saying:
    “I think it would still be good to keep some boundaries.
    Somethings I choose to do my way. Singaporeans can do things their own way, but I hope they don’t try to convert me into a Singaporean in all ways.”

    For that she was accused of not being genuine and sincere enough to be a Singaporean, by that chest thumping thamby, who said:
    “That’s the biggest problem you see when it comes to immigration. When immigrants come in with this mindset because Singaporeans can feel it if you’re genuine and you’re sincere and you want to know about the people in the country.”

    If only that stupid Indian guy can think as he thumped his chest. There’s nothing wrong in what she said. It’s true for all Singaporeans, newly converted citizens or not. Singapore is a multi-racial and multi-religious nation. There are so many
    boundaries, barriers and taboos between the various races and religions. Must a newly-converted Singaporean carry the stink of an Indian, wash their arse with their hands like the Malays and eat only halal food like the Muslims before he/she can be
    considered a genuine and sincere Singaporean? Not even a born-and-bred Singaporean would be like that.

    What prompted the PRC-converted citizen to say what she said? She was answering a question. The question was not revealed. The same question should be posed to converted citizens of other countries/races for their answers. But it’s not. Cunning
    racism.


    Sports for unity and patriotism.
    How stupid. Those flag-waving and roaring in a football stadium do not constitute patriotism. They are all for fun and entertainment only. If these people were to ask to suffer and sacrifice for Singapore, they would scoot off without a trace.

    Even in the realm of sports, the anti-Chinese racism of the racial minorities is blatant. All those foreign footballers whom they adored as heroes were non-Chinese. They had contributed little to the international reputation of Singapore. They were
    only well-known locally. In Malaysia, there’s the term ‘Jaguh Kampong’, i.e., Kampong Champ. In Singapore, those footballers were only ‘Jaguh Bandar’ i.e., City Champ. Out of Singapore, they are nothing.

    PRC Chinese, those who are PR or have converted to Singaporeans, have won honors for Singapore in international arenas, all the way to the Olympics, in the games of badminton and table-tennis. Their contributions to Singapore are much more than
    those footballers. Yet their efforts and sacrifices were not recognised. Instead, they were criticised frequently by the racial minorities, with their loyalties to SG being questioned. They were demoralised and have mostly left. And so have Singapore’s
    achievements in international badminton and table-tennis. That’s what anti-Chinese racism has caused to Singapore in sports.



    Foreign workers.
    Mostly from South Asia and mostly Indians. Because of that, their welfare is the concern of Singaporean Indians. Food, clothing and accommodation, only the best of these for them will do. Local Indian lawyers will fight for their legal rights. They
    would be ensured of the highest compensation over the slightest injuries so much so that many of them began to feign injuries or purposely injure themselves.
    Now in the Straits Times, there is the concern about their recruitment through middlemen. Indian middlemen make a big cut for their recruitment fee for Indians to work in SG. Now the SG authority is expected to help cut this out so that it will be
    financially easier for Indians to come to work in SG.
    If these foreign workers were mostly Chinese, the treatment will be very different. The racial minorities will be barking and howling for their evictions and return to China. That’s how racist are the racial minorities of SG.


    English- and Singlish-speaking
    Racial minorities only complain about non-English-speaking PRC Chinese, e.g. bus conductors but not a word about those foreign workers who mostly don’t speak a word of English.
    Singlish is only for fun and entertainment. That’s why it is used in comedy. It should not be a part of a Singaporean Identity. It will make Singapore a nation of country bumpkins.


    Luke Lu.
    This guy appears in the video for a good reason. He’s a champion of the English language in SG. While he was doing his postgraduate studies in Cambridge, UK, he wrote articles to the ST proudly claiming English to be his mother-tongue. In
    response, one local guy suggested that he proclaimed it to his lecturers and fellow students in Cambridge and report back their reactions. That stopped the issue. We know what happened. He had been ridiculed as a well-colonised WOG or something along
    that line. That is the stark reality. We can use English for its economic value. The rest of the world can understand that. Claiming more than that will earn ridicules and even despises, from the rest of the world. This is especially true for a Chinese
    Singaporean. While overseas, Singaporean Chinese are recognised for their ethnicity rather than nationality. Through him/her, people are interested to know more about that 5000 years of Chinese civilisation, its culture and history.



    The two videos are examples of crooked, crafty and cunning anti-Chinese racism, pure and simple. What gives those racists the temerity to do it? How can those involved be allowed to get away with it? It’s a piss of Indian racism by Indian-
    dominated English-language media CNA, which is becoming Channel News Aneh. For a long time now, Singapore’s English language media has been dominated by the Indians. It’s the media of Indian racism.


    It’s time for the Indian-dominated English language media to stop all these nonsense. Those bastards and bitches among the racial minorities know better than anyone else that they themselves are as racist as any Chinese they accuse of racism
    against them.


    The nation is now facing devastation by a coronavirus. Though it originated from India and is carried over to SG by Indians, it infects and kills all Singaporeans, equally, "regardless of race, language or religion". Perhaps that's the way we will
    all become equal, i.e., dead.
    Shanmugam and his FICA.

    He has China and Chinese in his mind, his phobia about Chinese Singaporeans being used to spy for China. He referred to the case of Huang Jing. Up till today, ordinary Singaporeans don’t know what exactly has he done. Of bigger concern to Shanguman
    is China interfering in the affairs of Singapore to promote and defend the interest of the Chinese majority here. Some years back, there was the case of a Singapore diplomat objecting to the Chinese Ambassador’s action in KL, Malaysia. He interpreted
    the Ambassador’s friendly act as one interfering in Malaysia’s affairs.

    https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/amid-rise-identity-politics-sporeans-need-beware-foreign-manipulation-bilahari-kausikan


    Someone gave a robust reply to the above article, pointing out how much India cultivates the Indian diaspora to benefit India. That’s the racist attitude of the racial minorities. While they raise concern about the threat of China to Singapore,they
    themselves would wish for their ancestor nations to be powerful enough to come to their aid, when they need it.


    The truth is that it is much more likely for India to interfere in Singapore’s affair on behalf of the ethnic Indians. The following are the reasons.

    1. Leaders from nations in South-east Asia which have substantial proportion of ethnic Chinese in they population, Singapore included, have persuaded and pushed leaders in China to make statements on Overseas Chinese to the following effects.

    a. Overseas Chinese are citizens of their respective nations.
    b. They should be loyal to their nations.
    c. China would have no political links with Overseas Chinese. They would have to solve problems they face within their own nations by themselves.

    There has never been such commitment from India. Singapore has made no attempt to extract a single statement of a similar nature from past and present governments of India. This is a grave mistake in our foreign policy which should not be left
    uncorrected. It’s becoming more urgent as India grows stronger and more Indians choose to settle in Singapore.



    2. Every January, India celebrates Pravasi Bharatiya Divas which in English means Overseas India Day. Overseas India refers to anywhere in the world where there are ethnic Indians. India refers to them as People of Indian Origin (PIO). On this day,
    PIO’s all over the world are expected to refresh their remembrance of their ancestor land, promote India to the world and commit themselves to contribute to the progress of their Mother India.

    Indian Singaporeans do respond to the call. One case from Singapore.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html

    If that were to be a case about Singaporean Chinese and China, Indians like Shanmugam would go hysterical about China interfering in the affairs of Singapore.

    a. By proclaiming places where there are PIO’s as Overseas India, India is making territorial claim in nations around the world where there are Indians. This is naked expansionism.

    b. This is an outright interference by India of those nations which have ethnic Indians among their population, Singapore included.


    3. India’s ever increasing population.
    India has failed to control its population growth. Despite being only about a third the size of China in territory, India’s population is going to surpass that of China and will continue to grow after that, with no end in sight. It was correctly
    predicted that the seven-billionth human would be an Indian. So too would be the eight-, nine-billionth and more billions beyond these.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIZyHMUGdq0

    With Indians continuing to mate and breed like pests, resulting in a runaway population growth, India has no choice but to seek territorial expansion. Already, Sikkim, and more recently Kashmir, has fallen victims to Indian expansionism. Its
    remaining close neighbors are wary of India. Under current US geopolitical strategy, India is USs’ strategic partner. It is a member of the QUAD, a grouping of US, India, Japan and Australia, covering the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, so called
    Indo-Pacific, allowing India’s naval power to extend to the Pacific. With such geopolitical blessings, the temptations for India to expand grows stronger. Beyond South Asia, nations in South-east Asia would be easy target for India’s expansionism.
    The tiniest among them, Singapore, would be easiest target.


    India, rather than China, is the existential threat that Singapore faces. The Indian invasion of Singapore has been ongoing, albeit peacefully. Singapore is being flooded with Indians entering it through legal means, with the assistance of Indian
    lawyers. Right now it’s a peaceful invasion. Later on it will be full military invasion and colonisation.


    Indians like Shanmugam will be selectively blind to the Indian threat while skillfully espousing the Chinese threat, a typical Indian cunning act. Shanmugam’s FICA is just another of his Fucking Indian Cunning Act.
    Listen to this. Make a copy before it is taken out of circulation.

    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny


    Indian Singaporeans like to complain against the majority Chinese Singaporeans, accusing the Chinese of racism over any little issue. Worse is that they are suspicious of China interfering in the affairs of Singapore and readily accuse the Chinese of
    having loyalty to China and spying for China. To counter these, Ethnic Indian Minister of Home Affairs, Shanmugam, recently enacted and passed a Foreign Interference (Countermeasure) Act in Parliament.

    Now we have two Indian Singaporeans discussing how India and Indians will takeover the world.

    The gist of their conversation is this. India’s population growth is out of control and Indians are migrating massively to many parts of the world, causing the Indian Diaspora to grow incessantly.

    What does this mean for the world? No one can put it more succinctly than Dr. Parag Khanna himself. With much pride, he says:

    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”,

    referring to the average skin color of Indians.


    This is stark Indian Racism. It’s time for people around the world to wake up to this. They are facing a future threat of Indianisation. The future for the rest of the world is this – being flooded and overwhelmed by Indians.

    Singapore, being a tiny nation, will be the first to be affected by this Indian Global Racism. Already, its happening. Indians population in Singapore has been increasing for decades. Indians here use whatever means, positions or power they have to
    support and promote Indians migration to Singapore.

    A few examples.
    Singaporeans Chinese are not breeding enough, causing Chinese population to shrink. Solution? Bring in more Indians.
    Singaporeans shun menial labor works. Solution? Bring in more Indians. Singapore is short of talents. Solution? Bring in more Indians.


    Singapore government should have a good grasp on the subject of India, Indian migration and the Indian diaspora. It should now seriously review its CECA with India, making sure there is no loopholes which allow mass migration of Indians to Singapore.


    Let’s see how Shanmugam will use FICA now. These two Indian Singaporeans are discussing how India and Indians will take over the whole world, which includes Singapore, of course. If FICA is not used to deal with them, Shanmugam should shut up and
    shaft FICA up his arse.


    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny
    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”.

    That future is already here, in Singapore. The island nation is turning brown. It's almost pure brown in Changi Business Park.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html
    “To make it more personal, DBS is one of the only two banks that decided to subsidiarise in India four years ago and it's instructive that the only reason I believe we were is because I run DBS and I'm an Indian-based CEO and I'm comfortable doing so.
    Most of the foreign banks were unwilling to do that,” he said.

    That is obviously a case of India using a member of the PIO in the Indian Diaspora in Singapore to serve its interest and that Indian in Singapore using his position to work for the interest of India.

    What do Shanmugam with his FICA and those Indian racists who always complain about Singapore becoming another China and they becoming second class citizen have to say?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From frodo sam0@21:1/5 to gera...@gmail.com on Sun Nov 28 05:14:23 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    Only poor and lowly educated Singaporeans are against globalisation and immigration. They are doing it out of jealousy. It has nothing to do with race.


    That means Singapore should continue to let in Indians under CECA. And something has to be done to those poor and lowly educated in Singapore. A carrot-and-stick approach, perhaps. Stick - make them feel guilty as racists. Carrot – PR work.
    Have those Indian professionals spend their weekends delivering free goods to them.


    The survey results are being used in a report titled Making Identity Count In Singapore: Understanding Singaporeans' National Pride And Identity.

    Why should Singaporeans national pride be in doubt because of their objections to CECA with India? On the contrary, its because they love their country that they are against it. They see what the Agreement has done to their country, flooding it
    with Indians.

    Do something to CECA with India. That’s the problem, not the poor and lowly educated in Singapore.
    Watch these two video from CNA, titled Pride Over Prejudice.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKLANK0n1iU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5loOMUWPyE



    Going by the number of participants, one would think that the Chinese form a minority in SG. There’s this unshaven, fierce looking Indian. In another CNA serial, he was thumping his chest proclaiming “This land is mine”. When he says it, he
    means Singapore has become part of India. Watch out for him. He will have more appearances. Indians think they have found a hero in him.


    Let’s go through some points raised in the videos and delve into their details a bit.


    Non-Chinese being the victims of Chinese racism.
    Racism exist between all races. No one race is only the victim, no one race is only the perpetrator. Non-Chinese should know how racists they themselves are toward Chinese.
    Why no Chinese has been invited to speak of the racism they have experienced from the racial minorities? There are at least three serious cases with videos to support them.

    1. Malay man spat repeatedly at Chinese woman at a bus station. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfI_l2DpGsE
    2. Indian man spew profanities lasting minutes at Chinese at a food outlet.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E3z7mPVReQ
    3. Indian woman assaulted Chinese woman in a shop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyNOq9vUbd4

    Has anyone from the racial minorities been treated as badly by anyone from the Chinese majority? These were major racial incidents which should have created waves but they were played down, only briefly reported in the media. In contrast, Chinese
    who are accused of being racists over the slightest incidents are widely reported, exposed and criticised. They are harshly punished by the law, lose their jobs and livelihoods and become patients in IMH.


    PRC and Chinese
    “It is true that everywhere we go,we will see these PRCs. There are a few people around me who say that we are going to be a little China soon. This is what the Singaporean minority groups are afraid of and we will be treated like second-hands.


    This is so anti-Chinese and anti-China. How can you “see” a PRC or Chinese? East Asians like Chinese, Koreans and Japs, South-East Asians like Vietnamese, they all look alike.
    Those who have grown up in Singapore since its independence will know the obvious change in the nation’s population - there are now many more non-Chinese, especially Indians.
    Those who are worried about there being more PRC or Chinese are just being racists. They would like to see more of their own kind instead.


    Throwing doubt at a PRC-converted Singaporean.
    One PRC-converted Singaporean was quoted as saying:
    “I think it would still be good to keep some boundaries.
    Somethings I choose to do my way. Singaporeans can do things their own way, but I hope they don’t try to convert me into a Singaporean in all ways.”

    For that she was accused of not being genuine and sincere enough to be a Singaporean, by that chest thumping thamby, who said:
    “That’s the biggest problem you see when it comes to immigration. When immigrants come in with this mindset because Singaporeans can feel it if you’re genuine and you’re sincere and you want to know about the people in the country.”

    If only that stupid Indian guy can think as he thumped his chest. There’s nothing wrong in what she said. It’s true for all Singaporeans, newly converted citizens or not. Singapore is a multi-racial and multi-religious nation. There are so
    many boundaries, barriers and taboos between the various races and religions. Must a newly-converted Singaporean carry the stink of an Indian, wash their arse with their hands like the Malays and eat only halal food like the Muslims before he/she can be
    considered a genuine and sincere Singaporean? Not even a born-and-bred Singaporean would be like that.

    What prompted the PRC-converted citizen to say what she said? She was answering a question. The question was not revealed. The same question should be posed to converted citizens of other countries/races for their answers. But it’s not. Cunning
    racism.


    Sports for unity and patriotism.
    How stupid. Those flag-waving and roaring in a football stadium do not constitute patriotism. They are all for fun and entertainment only. If these people were to ask to suffer and sacrifice for Singapore, they would scoot off without a trace.

    Even in the realm of sports, the anti-Chinese racism of the racial minorities is blatant. All those foreign footballers whom they adored as heroes were non-Chinese. They had contributed little to the international reputation of Singapore. They
    were only well-known locally. In Malaysia, there’s the term ‘Jaguh Kampong’, i.e., Kampong Champ. In Singapore, those footballers were only ‘Jaguh Bandar’ i.e., City Champ. Out of Singapore, they are nothing.

    PRC Chinese, those who are PR or have converted to Singaporeans, have won honors for Singapore in international arenas, all the way to the Olympics, in the games of badminton and table-tennis. Their contributions to Singapore are much more than
    those footballers. Yet their efforts and sacrifices were not recognised. Instead, they were criticised frequently by the racial minorities, with their loyalties to SG being questioned. They were demoralised and have mostly left. And so have Singapore’s
    achievements in international badminton and table-tennis. That’s what anti-Chinese racism has caused to Singapore in sports.



    Foreign workers.
    Mostly from South Asia and mostly Indians. Because of that, their welfare is the concern of Singaporean Indians. Food, clothing and accommodation, only the best of these for them will do. Local Indian lawyers will fight for their legal rights.
    They would be ensured of the highest compensation over the slightest injuries so much so that many of them began to feign injuries or purposely injure themselves.
    Now in the Straits Times, there is the concern about their recruitment through middlemen. Indian middlemen make a big cut for their recruitment fee for Indians to work in SG. Now the SG authority is expected to help cut this out so that it will
    be financially easier for Indians to come to work in SG.
    If these foreign workers were mostly Chinese, the treatment will be very different. The racial minorities will be barking and howling for their evictions and return to China. That’s how racist are the racial minorities of SG.


    English- and Singlish-speaking
    Racial minorities only complain about non-English-speaking PRC Chinese, e.g. bus conductors but not a word about those foreign workers who mostly don’t speak a word of English.
    Singlish is only for fun and entertainment. That’s why it is used in comedy. It should not be a part of a Singaporean Identity. It will make Singapore a nation of country bumpkins.


    Luke Lu.
    This guy appears in the video for a good reason. He’s a champion of the English language in SG. While he was doing his postgraduate studies in Cambridge, UK, he wrote articles to the ST proudly claiming English to be his mother-tongue. In
    response, one local guy suggested that he proclaimed it to his lecturers and fellow students in Cambridge and report back their reactions. That stopped the issue. We know what happened. He had been ridiculed as a well-colonised WOG or something along
    that line. That is the stark reality. We can use English for its economic value. The rest of the world can understand that. Claiming more than that will earn ridicules and even despises, from the rest of the world. This is especially true for a Chinese
    Singaporean. While overseas, Singaporean Chinese are recognised for their ethnicity rather than nationality. Through him/her, people are interested to know more about that 5000 years of Chinese civilisation, its culture and history.



    The two videos are examples of crooked, crafty and cunning anti-Chinese racism, pure and simple. What gives those racists the temerity to do it? How can those involved be allowed to get away with it? It’s a piss of Indian racism by Indian-
    dominated English-language media CNA, which is becoming Channel News Aneh. For a long time now, Singapore’s English language media has been dominated by the Indians. It’s the media of Indian racism.


    It’s time for the Indian-dominated English language media to stop all these nonsense. Those bastards and bitches among the racial minorities know better than anyone else that they themselves are as racist as any Chinese they accuse of racism
    against them.


    The nation is now facing devastation by a coronavirus. Though it originated from India and is carried over to SG by Indians, it infects and kills all Singaporeans, equally, "regardless of race, language or religion". Perhaps that's the way we
    will all become equal, i.e., dead.
    Shanmugam and his FICA.

    He has China and Chinese in his mind, his phobia about Chinese Singaporeans being used to spy for China. He referred to the case of Huang Jing. Up till today, ordinary Singaporeans don’t know what exactly has he done. Of bigger concern to
    Shanguman is China interfering in the affairs of Singapore to promote and defend the interest of the Chinese majority here. Some years back, there was the case of a Singapore diplomat objecting to the Chinese Ambassador’s action in KL, Malaysia. He
    interpreted the Ambassador’s friendly act as one interfering in Malaysia’s affairs.

    https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/amid-rise-identity-politics-sporeans-need-beware-foreign-manipulation-bilahari-kausikan


    Someone gave a robust reply to the above article, pointing out how much India cultivates the Indian diaspora to benefit India. That’s the racist attitude of the racial minorities. While they raise concern about the threat of China to Singapore,
    they themselves would wish for their ancestor nations to be powerful enough to come to their aid, when they need it.


    The truth is that it is much more likely for India to interfere in Singapore’s affair on behalf of the ethnic Indians. The following are the reasons.

    1. Leaders from nations in South-east Asia which have substantial proportion of ethnic Chinese in they population, Singapore included, have persuaded and pushed leaders in China to make statements on Overseas Chinese to the following effects.

    a. Overseas Chinese are citizens of their respective nations.
    b. They should be loyal to their nations.
    c. China would have no political links with Overseas Chinese. They would have to solve problems they face within their own nations by themselves.

    There has never been such commitment from India. Singapore has made no attempt to extract a single statement of a similar nature from past and present governments of India. This is a grave mistake in our foreign policy which should not be left
    uncorrected. It’s becoming more urgent as India grows stronger and more Indians choose to settle in Singapore.



    2. Every January, India celebrates Pravasi Bharatiya Divas which in English means Overseas India Day. Overseas India refers to anywhere in the world where there are ethnic Indians. India refers to them as People of Indian Origin (PIO). On this day,
    PIO’s all over the world are expected to refresh their remembrance of their ancestor land, promote India to the world and commit themselves to contribute to the progress of their Mother India.

    Indian Singaporeans do respond to the call. One case from Singapore.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html

    If that were to be a case about Singaporean Chinese and China, Indians like Shanmugam would go hysterical about China interfering in the affairs of Singapore.

    a. By proclaiming places where there are PIO’s as Overseas India, India is making territorial claim in nations around the world where there are Indians. This is naked expansionism.

    b. This is an outright interference by India of those nations which have ethnic Indians among their population, Singapore included.


    3. India’s ever increasing population.
    India has failed to control its population growth. Despite being only about a third the size of China in territory, India’s population is going to surpass that of China and will continue to grow after that, with no end in sight. It was correctly
    predicted that the seven-billionth human would be an Indian. So too would be the eight-, nine-billionth and more billions beyond these.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIZyHMUGdq0

    With Indians continuing to mate and breed like pests, resulting in a runaway population growth, India has no choice but to seek territorial expansion. Already, Sikkim, and more recently Kashmir, has fallen victims to Indian expansionism. Its
    remaining close neighbors are wary of India. Under current US geopolitical strategy, India is USs’ strategic partner. It is a member of the QUAD, a grouping of US, India, Japan and Australia, covering the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, so called
    Indo-Pacific, allowing India’s naval power to extend to the Pacific. With such geopolitical blessings, the temptations for India to expand grows stronger. Beyond South Asia, nations in South-east Asia would be easy target for India’s expansionism.
    The tiniest among them, Singapore, would be easiest target.


    India, rather than China, is the existential threat that Singapore faces. The Indian invasion of Singapore has been ongoing, albeit peacefully. Singapore is being flooded with Indians entering it through legal means, with the assistance of Indian
    lawyers. Right now it’s a peaceful invasion. Later on it will be full military invasion and colonisation.


    Indians like Shanmugam will be selectively blind to the Indian threat while skillfully espousing the Chinese threat, a typical Indian cunning act. Shanmugam’s FICA is just another of his Fucking Indian Cunning Act.
    Listen to this. Make a copy before it is taken out of circulation.

    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny


    Indian Singaporeans like to complain against the majority Chinese Singaporeans, accusing the Chinese of racism over any little issue. Worse is that they are suspicious of China interfering in the affairs of Singapore and readily accuse the Chinese of
    having loyalty to China and spying for China. To counter these, Ethnic Indian Minister of Home Affairs, Shanmugam, recently enacted and passed a Foreign Interference (Countermeasure) Act in Parliament.

    Now we have two Indian Singaporeans discussing how India and Indians will takeover the world.

    The gist of their conversation is this. India’s population growth is out of control and Indians are migrating massively to many parts of the world, causing the Indian Diaspora to grow incessantly.

    What does this mean for the world? No one can put it more succinctly than Dr. Parag Khanna himself. With much pride, he says:

    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”,

    referring to the average skin color of Indians.


    This is stark Indian Racism. It’s time for people around the world to wake up to this. They are facing a future threat of Indianisation. The future for the rest of the world is this – being flooded and overwhelmed by Indians.

    Singapore, being a tiny nation, will be the first to be affected by this Indian Global Racism. Already, its happening. Indians population in Singapore has been increasing for decades. Indians here use whatever means, positions or power they have to
    support and promote Indians migration to Singapore.

    A few examples.
    Singaporeans Chinese are not breeding enough, causing Chinese population to shrink. Solution? Bring in more Indians.
    Singaporeans shun menial labor works. Solution? Bring in more Indians. Singapore is short of talents. Solution? Bring in more Indians.


    Singapore government should have a good grasp on the subject of India, Indian migration and the Indian diaspora. It should now seriously review its CECA with India, making sure there is no loopholes which allow mass migration of Indians to Singapore.


    Let’s see how Shanmugam will use FICA now. These two Indian Singaporeans are discussing how India and Indians will take over the whole world, which includes Singapore, of course. If FICA is not used to deal with them, Shanmugam should shut up and
    shaft FICA up his arse.
    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny
    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”.

    That future is already here, in Singapore. The island nation is turning brown. It's almost pure brown in Changi Business Park.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html
    “To make it more personal, DBS is one of the only two banks that decided to subsidiarise in India four years ago and it's instructive that the only reason I believe we were is because I run DBS and I'm an Indian-based CEO and I'm comfortable doing so.
    Most of the foreign banks were unwilling to do that,” he said.

    That is obviously a case of India using a member of the PIO in the Indian Diaspora in Singapore to serve its interest and that Indian in Singapore using his position to work for the interest of India.

    What do Shanmugam with his FICA and those Indian racists who always complain about Singapore becoming another China and they becoming second class citizen have to say?

    Not again. Another Indian using CNA (Channel News Aneh) to portray Indians as victims of racial discrimination committed by the Chinese. This one is more cunning. He is doing it behind the facade of food.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Who+We+Are%2C+What+We+Eat+-+Part+1


    The fact is, in Singapore, you will find the most racist bastards and bitches among the Indians.

    We have an Indian in Singapore as CEO of Singapore’s largest bank who had confessed that it’s racial affinity which had driven him to invest the bank’s wealth in India.

    Another Indian in Singapore writes about the world turning brown, as the average skin color of Indians.

    Of all the Indians in the world, why would it take one from Singapore to be such Global Racists?

    Answer: When he looks at the increasing presence and influence of Indians in Singapore, in particular, that nearly-all-Indians Changi Business Park (CBP).

    Indian politicians, those in positions of influence in public institutions, those in the media industry and those spending a lot of time on social media, always portray Indians as pitiful victims of racial discrimination and condemning Chinese as
    racists. But they are all quiet on what these two Indians have done.

    While the local Indians keep crying bucketful of tears about discrimination, more Indians keep snaking and sneaking into Singapore, taking up jobs from laborers to professionals, until they can boast that their median income is the highest among all the
    races in SG.

    These racists have a scheme to bring in as many Indians to Singapore as possible while keeping the Chinese out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Mon Dec 6 19:17:11 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    It’s also about trust, or a lack of it. The Chinese majority cannot trust a non-Chinese PM to work for their interest and not to place the interest of his own race above that of the Chinese. This is not prejudice. Everyone can see how an Indian boss
    would prefer Indian subordinates. This goes all the way down the hierarchy until the whole organisation is almost all-Indian, all-brown. This happens in government, private sectors, even NGO’s.

    Conclusion: Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Tue Dec 7 05:17:12 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    Singapore is a Chinese-majority ruled nation. This would be meaningless if its ruler, which under the current political system is the Prime Minister, is not Chinese.

    Many would scream: “It should be based on capability and performance!”. Agree. But what determines capability and performance? Being able to govern the country well. Governing a Chinese-majority Singapore means being able to communicate with ,
    relate to and motivate the Chinese-majority in the population. Who can do it better than a Chinese? This is meritocracy. A Chinese would naturally have the merits of being able to lead the majority of Singaporeans, who are Chinese.

    It’s also about fairness. The country depends more on the Chinese than all the other races combined. In times of peace, it’s depends most on the Chinese to drive the economy and maintain social order. In times of war, it depends most on the Chinese
    for its defence. Its only fair that a Chinese should lead the country.

    It’s also about security. The Chinese majority will not feel secure about having their future in the hands of a non-Chinese.

    It’s also about trust, or a lack of it. The Chinese majority cannot trust a non-Chinese PM to work for their interest and not to place the interest of his own race above that of the Chinese. This is not prejudice. Everyone can see how an Indian boss
    would prefer Indian subordinates. This goes all the way down the hierarchy until the whole organisation is almost all-Indian, all-brown. This happens in government, private sectors, even NGO’s.

    Conclusion: Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese.

    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singapore?

    Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with a substantial Chinese-majority.

    The national identity of Singapore should be defined by its multi-racial, multi-religious population. A Singaporean, therefore, has a national as well as a racial identity. He/she can, and should, be proud of both.

    A race-blind, One People Singaporean cannot be achieved. Why?

    Race is about history and ancestry. Forsaking your race is forsaking your history and ancestry. Each of the three major races in Singapore has a long history. Indians and Malays are also identified with religions.

    Most Indians are Hindus. In the case of the Malays, race and religion are intertwined and inseparable. By their own definition, Malays are Muslims. Asking Malays to forget their race would also be asking them to forget their religion of Islam. Is this
    possible?

    The three main races in Singapore have different histories. Malays formed the majority of the inhabitants of this island before the Brits colonised it. After that the Brits opened the island to migration of non-Malays, mostly Chinese and Indians, until
    the Malays became the minority. To this day, Malays consider the non-Malays as ‘pendatang’ ,i.e, guests or sojourners.

    Under British colonial rule, all races were allowed to remain as they were. Now descendants of the ‘pendatang’ want everyone to forget about race. You expect the Malays to accept that? Malays in the region form a solid sea surrounding the island of
    Singapore. Would they see their fellow Malays in Singapore losing their racial identity, thus losing all racial ties with them, and not doing anything about it?

    There will be discrimination and prejudices in a multi-racial, multi-religious society. From time to time, when they get extremes, they will have to be fixed. But going race-blind and religion-blind to fix them would be an overkill, like rebuilding a
    whole house to fix one weak structure.

    Who started all these nonsense about a post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore? It can’t be the Chinese because they form the majority on the island. It can’t be the Malays because to them it would mean losing their religion and
    racially disown themselves from a solid majority in the surrounding region. It’s those cunning Indians who neither form the majority on the island nor the region. They feel inferior in terms of numbers. Therefore, they are keen to disregard race. That
    s only when they are in Singapore though. In India, they would not disown their race but would enjoy all privileges that come with it. Eventhough India is a very racist country, they would definitely not espouse their idea of a post-racial, race-blind,
    India.

    Only damned fools will be fooled by these cunning Indians.

    There are some Chinese politicians in the Opposition WP who are such fools. In the Last GE, the party fielded a team with a majority of non-Chinese candidates. When the party won, its Chinese leaders claimed that Singaporeans are no more fixated with
    race. It shows how dumb they are. The people are still fixated with race but they are more fixated with having more Opposition voices in Parliament. Moreover, the PAP team was not helm by any heavyweight Minister. It was a 'suicide squad', as the WP
    itself claimed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Wed Dec 8 05:03:27 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    Just hours after his speech, a police report was lodged against him by a member of the racial minority. Reason? He has hurt the sensitivities of the racial minorities!

    Latest opinion from LW: Minority PM is OK.

    https://mustsharenews.com/lawrence-wong-minority-pm/


    Surveys have shown that each race would prefer a member of its own race to be the PM. It shows that racial identity is strong. That’s natural. That’s reality. LW thinks this is wrong and he is going to change it.

    The Opposition:
    It has become an issue for adversarial politics. To oppose for the sake of opposing, the Opposition is for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/mothership_spore-public-ready-for-non-chinese-pm-psps-hazel-poa-and-wps-gerald-giam_250121.pdf

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j72bKAsoeY8



    Why not put it succinctly - Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese. Why?

    Singapore is a Chinese-majority ruled nation. This would be meaningless if its ruler, which under the current political system is the Prime Minister, is not Chinese.

    Many would scream: “It should be based on capability and performance!”. Agree. But what determines capability and performance? Being able to govern the country well. Governing a Chinese-majority Singapore means being able to communicate with ,
    relate to and motivate the Chinese-majority in the population. Who can do it better than a Chinese? This is meritocracy. A Chinese would naturally have the merits of being able to lead the majority of Singaporeans, who are Chinese.

    It’s also about fairness. The country depends more on the Chinese than all the other races combined. In times of peace, it’s depends most on the Chinese to drive the economy and maintain social order. In times of war, it depends most on the
    Chinese for its defence. Its only fair that a Chinese should lead the country.

    It’s also about security. The Chinese majority will not feel secure about having their future in the hands of a non-Chinese.

    It’s also about trust, or a lack of it. The Chinese majority cannot trust a non-Chinese PM to work for their interest and not to place the interest of his own race above that of the Chinese. This is not prejudice. Everyone can see how an Indian
    boss would prefer Indian subordinates. This goes all the way down the hierarchy until the whole organisation is almost all-Indian, all-brown. This happens in government, private sectors, even NGO’s.

    Conclusion: Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese.
    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singapore?

    Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with a substantial Chinese-majority.

    The national identity of Singapore should be defined by its multi-racial, multi-religious population. A Singaporean, therefore, has a national as well as a racial identity. He/she can, and should, be proud of both.

    A race-blind, One People Singaporean cannot be achieved. Why?

    Race is about history and ancestry. Forsaking your race is forsaking your history and ancestry. Each of the three major races in Singapore has a long history. Indians and Malays are also identified with religions.

    Most Indians are Hindus. In the case of the Malays, race and religion are intertwined and inseparable. By their own definition, Malays are Muslims. Asking Malays to forget their race would also be asking them to forget their religion of Islam. Is this
    possible?

    The three main races in Singapore have different histories. Malays formed the majority of the inhabitants of this island before the Brits colonised it. After that the Brits opened the island to migration of non-Malays, mostly Chinese and Indians, until
    the Malays became the minority. To this day, Malays consider the non-Malays as ‘pendatang’ ,i.e, guests or sojourners.

    Under British colonial rule, all races were allowed to remain as they were. Now descendants of the ‘pendatang’ want everyone to forget about race. You expect the Malays to accept that? Malays in the region form a solid sea surrounding the island of
    Singapore. Would they see their fellow Malays in Singapore losing their racial identity, thus losing all racial ties with them, and not doing anything about it?

    There will be discrimination and prejudices in a multi-racial, multi-religious society. From time to time, when they get extremes, they will have to be fixed. But going race-blind and religion-blind to fix them would be an overkill, like rebuilding a
    whole house to fix one weak structure.

    Who started all these nonsense about a post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore? It can’t be the Chinese because they form the majority on the island. It can’t be the Malays because to them it would mean losing their religion and
    racially disown themselves from a solid majority in the surrounding region. It’s those cunning Indians who neither form the majority on the island nor the region. They feel inferior in terms of numbers. Therefore, they are keen to disregard race. That
    s only when they are in Singapore though. In India, they would not disown their race but would enjoy all privileges that come with it. Eventhough India is a very racist country, they would definitely not espouse their idea of a post-racial, race-blind,
    India.

    Only damned fools will be fooled by these cunning Indians.

    There are some Chinese politicians in the Opposition WP who are such fools. In the Last GE, the party fielded a team with a majority of non-Chinese candidates. When the party won, its Chinese leaders claimed that Singaporeans are no more fixated with
    race. It shows how dumb they are. The people are still fixated with race but they are more fixated with having more Opposition voices in Parliament. Moreover, the PAP team was not helm by any heavyweight Minister. It was a 'suicide squad', as the WP
    itself claimed.


    Racial diversity and inclusiveness?

    We started off with Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others (CMIO). ‘Others’ include all other ethnicity beside the three main ones. This is already enough, more than enough, of racial diversity and inclusiveness, including the problems which come with it.
    The more racially diverse we become, the more social fault-lines there will be and the more fractious will the country become.

    There have been an obvious increase in the nation’s racial diversity. There was a change in migration policy around mid-1980s which caused an increase in migration of non-Chinese over the following decades. The reason given by the media was that it was
    to make up for the fall of population. But its the Chinese population which was falling due a drop in Chinese fertility rate. Where’s the logic? If it’s Chinese fertility rate that’s falling, more Chinese, not non-Chinese, migration should be
    welcomed.

    Today, on this island, there are so many people of so many different nationalities and ethnicity that people belonging to a particular nationality or ethnicity can be out on the street to stage a big protest on behalf of their nation or ethnicity.

    The racial minorities call for more racial diversity is a cunning ploy to dilute and diminish the Chinese majority in the population. Over the decades, Chinese proportion in Singapore’s population has dropped while those of the other three racial
    groups have risen.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore#Ethnic_groups


    To each of the racial minority, more racial diversity means having more of their own race in the population. It’s been very effective. The demography of Singapore has gone through obvious changes, most obvious of which is the increasing number of non-
    Chinese in the population. The Indians have been most vocal on racial diversity, for cunning reasons. They are neither the majority on the island nor its surrounding region. Their call for racial diversity is made with having more of their own kind in
    mind. Not surprisingly, they are the biggest beneficiaries of racial diversity. There are now many more Indians in Singapore than at any time. So many that they make an Indian Singaporean, international author Pranag Khanna, believes that the future of
    Singapore and the world will be very, very brown.

    If it were to be the other way around, where the proportion of the racial minorities in the population drops while that of the Chinese rises, the minorities would cry out till them drop about “Racism!”.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Wed Dec 8 20:32:59 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    Let’s start off with the second item on the list which is currently a hot-button, sensitive issue, especially to the racial minorities.

    A non-Chinese PM for Singapore?

    A police report was put up against ex-DPM Heng over his remark on this issue, which displeased the racial minorities. This issue is not only raised and discussed within Singapore. It has become an international issue. Foreign media talk and write
    about it. Even ex-President Trump of the US had openly, in front of an international media, asked Singapore’s current PM about it, during the latter’s last visit to the US. (This is foreign interference. Shanmugam, with his FICA, should ensure that
    no foreigners meddle with this issue, within or beyond Singapore). The answer from LHL to Trump was a firm “No”.

    Before this, LHL had said:
    “Singapore may have a non-Chinese prime minister one day but that is unlikely to happen any time soon.”

    https://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20081108-99242.html


    Ex-DPM HSK: Older generations of Singaporeans not ready for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://www.ntu.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ntu/media-hub/0378-finance-minister-heng-swee-keat-speaks-at-ntu-students-union-ministerial-forum/malaymail_190329_minister-older-generation-of-singaporeans-not-ready-for-non-chinese-pm.pdf?sfvrsn=2190a1b7_
    2

    Just hours after his speech, a police report was lodged against him by a member of the racial minority. Reason? He has hurt the sensitivities of the racial minorities!

    Latest opinion from LW: Minority PM is OK.

    https://mustsharenews.com/lawrence-wong-minority-pm/


    Surveys have shown that each race would prefer a member of its own race to be the PM. It shows that racial identity is strong. That’s natural. That’s reality. LW thinks this is wrong and he is going to change it.

    The Opposition:
    It has become an issue for adversarial politics. To oppose for the sake of opposing, the Opposition is for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/mothership_spore-public-ready-for-non-chinese-pm-psps-hazel-poa-and-wps-gerald-giam_250121.pdf

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j72bKAsoeY8



    Why not put it succinctly - Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese. Why?

    Singapore is a Chinese-majority ruled nation. This would be meaningless if its ruler, which under the current political system is the Prime Minister, is not Chinese.

    Many would scream: “It should be based on capability and performance!”. Agree. But what determines capability and performance? Being able to govern the country well. Governing a Chinese-majority Singapore means being able to communicate with ,
    relate to and motivate the Chinese-majority in the population. Who can do it better than a Chinese? This is meritocracy. A Chinese would naturally have the merits of being able to lead the majority of Singaporeans, who are Chinese.

    It’s also about fairness. The country depends more on the Chinese than all the other races combined. In times of peace, it’s depends most on the Chinese to drive the economy and maintain social order. In times of war, it depends most on the
    Chinese for its defence. Its only fair that a Chinese should lead the country.

    It’s also about security. The Chinese majority will not feel secure about having their future in the hands of a non-Chinese.

    It’s also about trust, or a lack of it. The Chinese majority cannot trust a non-Chinese PM to work for their interest and not to place the interest of his own race above that of the Chinese. This is not prejudice. Everyone can see how an Indian
    boss would prefer Indian subordinates. This goes all the way down the hierarchy until the whole organisation is almost all-Indian, all-brown. This happens in government, private sectors, even NGO’s.

    Conclusion: Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese.
    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singapore?

    Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with a substantial Chinese-majority.

    The national identity of Singapore should be defined by its multi-racial, multi-religious population. A Singaporean, therefore, has a national as well as a racial identity. He/she can, and should, be proud of both.

    A race-blind, One People Singaporean cannot be achieved. Why?

    Race is about history and ancestry. Forsaking your race is forsaking your history and ancestry. Each of the three major races in Singapore has a long history. Indians and Malays are also identified with religions.

    Most Indians are Hindus. In the case of the Malays, race and religion are intertwined and inseparable. By their own definition, Malays are Muslims. Asking Malays to forget their race would also be asking them to forget their religion of Islam. Is
    this possible?

    The three main races in Singapore have different histories. Malays formed the majority of the inhabitants of this island before the Brits colonised it. After that the Brits opened the island to migration of non-Malays, mostly Chinese and Indians,
    until the Malays became the minority. To this day, Malays consider the non-Malays as ‘pendatang’ ,i.e, guests or sojourners.

    Under British colonial rule, all races were allowed to remain as they were. Now descendants of the ‘pendatang’ want everyone to forget about race. You expect the Malays to accept that? Malays in the region form a solid sea surrounding the island
    of Singapore. Would they see their fellow Malays in Singapore losing their racial identity, thus losing all racial ties with them, and not doing anything about it?

    There will be discrimination and prejudices in a multi-racial, multi-religious society. From time to time, when they get extremes, they will have to be fixed. But going race-blind and religion-blind to fix them would be an overkill, like rebuilding a
    whole house to fix one weak structure.

    Who started all these nonsense about a post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore? It can’t be the Chinese because they form the majority on the island. It can’t be the Malays because to them it would mean losing their religion
    and racially disown themselves from a solid majority in the surrounding region. It’s those cunning Indians who neither form the majority on the island nor the region. They feel inferior in terms of numbers. Therefore, they are keen to disregard race.
    That’s only when they are in Singapore though. In India, they would not disown their race but would enjoy all privileges that come with it. Eventhough India is a very racist country, they would definitely not espouse their idea of a post-racial, race-
    blind, India.

    Only damned fools will be fooled by these cunning Indians.

    There are some Chinese politicians in the Opposition WP who are such fools. In the Last GE, the party fielded a team with a majority of non-Chinese candidates. When the party won, its Chinese leaders claimed that Singaporeans are no more fixated with
    race. It shows how dumb they are. The people are still fixated with race but they are more fixated with having more Opposition voices in Parliament. Moreover, the PAP team was not helm by any heavyweight Minister. It was a 'suicide squad', as the WP
    itself claimed.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness?

    We started off with Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others (CMIO). ‘Others’ include all other ethnicity beside the three main ones. This is already enough, more than enough, of racial diversity and inclusiveness, including the problems which come with
    it. The more racially diverse we become, the more social fault-lines there will be and the more fractious will the country become.

    There have been an obvious increase in the nation’s racial diversity. There was a change in migration policy around mid-1980s which caused an increase in migration of non-Chinese over the following decades. The reason given by the media was that it
    was to make up for the fall of population. But its the Chinese population which was falling due a drop in Chinese fertility rate. Where’s the logic? If it’s Chinese fertility rate that’s falling, more Chinese, not non-Chinese, migration should be
    welcomed.

    Today, on this island, there are so many people of so many different nationalities and ethnicity that people belonging to a particular nationality or ethnicity can be out on the street to stage a big protest on behalf of their nation or ethnicity.

    The racial minorities call for more racial diversity is a cunning ploy to dilute and diminish the Chinese majority in the population. Over the decades, Chinese proportion in Singapore’s population has dropped while those of the other three racial
    groups have risen.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore#Ethnic_groups


    To each of the racial minority, more racial diversity means having more of their own race in the population. It’s been very effective. The demography of Singapore has gone through obvious changes, most obvious of which is the increasing number of non-
    Chinese in the population. The Indians have been most vocal on racial diversity, for cunning reasons. They are neither the majority on the island nor its surrounding region. Their call for racial diversity is made with having more of their own kind in
    mind. Not surprisingly, they are the biggest beneficiaries of racial diversity. There are now many more Indians in Singapore than at any time. So many that they make an Indian Singaporean, international author Pranag Khanna, believes that the future of
    Singapore and the world will be very, very brown.

    If it were to be the other way around, where the proportion of the racial minorities in the population drops while that of the Chinese rises, the minorities would cry out till them drop about “Racism!”.


    Mixed marriage?

    The racial minorities support and encourage mixed marriage of a Chinese female to a non-Chinese male resulting in a racial and gender bias in mixed marriages in Singapore – non-Chinese males marrying Chinese females.

    https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=singapore+mixed+marriage&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjjyfyntNH0AhVXi9gFHSNMBw8Q2-cCegQIABAA&oq=singapore+mixed+marriage&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoECAAQQzoFCAAQgARQjgpYuUVgl2VoAHAAeACAAZIBiAHTCJIBAzcuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&
    sclient=img&ei=0y2vYaOUGdeW4t4Po5ideA&bih=524&biw=1120

    To the racial minority, this means one more for their race and one fewer for the Chinese. When an Indian male marries a Chinese female, the wife and off-springs will be Indianised. When a Malay male, who would also be a Muslim, marries a Chinese female,
    the wife would first have to be converted to Islam. Their off-springs would become Muslims.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=singapore+mixed+marriage

    Looking at the photos, there is also a skin color bias. Most of the pairings are dark-skinned males with fair-skinned females.

    In India, Muslim men are accused of enticing Hindu women into marriages in a ‘Love Jihad’. In Singapore, are Chinese women being enticed by non-Chinese men into marriages of ‘Love Racism’? Those non-Chinese men only doing it for their race?

    Of course there are mixed marriages which do not fit the general rules mentioned but they are the exceptions. They are the wrath of the racial minorities.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Fri Dec 10 18:10:52 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    Chinese-ness and Chinese-majority in Singapore are being increasingly challenged by whatever devious and cunning means the racial minorities can think of.

    Just to list a few.

    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore.
    A non-Chinese Prime Minister.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness.
    Mixed marriages.
    Expand the ‘common space’ of Western culture and English Language.


    Let’s start off with the second item on the list which is currently a hot-button, sensitive issue, especially to the racial minorities.

    A non-Chinese PM for Singapore?

    A police report was put up against ex-DPM Heng over his remark on this issue, which displeased the racial minorities. This issue is not only raised and discussed within Singapore. It has become an international issue. Foreign media talk and write
    about it. Even ex-President Trump of the US had openly, in front of an international media, asked Singapore’s current PM about it, during the latter’s last visit to the US. (This is foreign interference. Shanmugam, with his FICA, should ensure that
    no foreigners meddle with this issue, within or beyond Singapore). The answer from LHL to Trump was a firm “No”.

    Before this, LHL had said:
    “Singapore may have a non-Chinese prime minister one day but that is unlikely to happen any time soon.”

    https://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20081108-99242.html


    Ex-DPM HSK: Older generations of Singaporeans not ready for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://www.ntu.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ntu/media-hub/0378-finance-minister-heng-swee-keat-speaks-at-ntu-students-union-ministerial-forum/malaymail_190329_minister-older-generation-of-singaporeans-not-ready-for-non-chinese-pm.pdf?sfvrsn=
    2190a1b7_2

    Just hours after his speech, a police report was lodged against him by a member of the racial minority. Reason? He has hurt the sensitivities of the racial minorities!

    Latest opinion from LW: Minority PM is OK.

    https://mustsharenews.com/lawrence-wong-minority-pm/


    Surveys have shown that each race would prefer a member of its own race to be the PM. It shows that racial identity is strong. That’s natural. That’s reality. LW thinks this is wrong and he is going to change it.

    The Opposition:
    It has become an issue for adversarial politics. To oppose for the sake of opposing, the Opposition is for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/mothership_spore-public-ready-for-non-chinese-pm-psps-hazel-poa-and-wps-gerald-giam_250121.pdf

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j72bKAsoeY8



    Why not put it succinctly - Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese. Why?

    Singapore is a Chinese-majority ruled nation. This would be meaningless if its ruler, which under the current political system is the Prime Minister, is not Chinese.

    Many would scream: “It should be based on capability and performance!”. Agree. But what determines capability and performance? Being able to govern the country well. Governing a Chinese-majority Singapore means being able to communicate with ,
    relate to and motivate the Chinese-majority in the population. Who can do it better than a Chinese? This is meritocracy. A Chinese would naturally have the merits of being able to lead the majority of Singaporeans, who are Chinese.

    It’s also about fairness. The country depends more on the Chinese than all the other races combined. In times of peace, it’s depends most on the Chinese to drive the economy and maintain social order. In times of war, it depends most on the
    Chinese for its defence. Its only fair that a Chinese should lead the country.

    It’s also about security. The Chinese majority will not feel secure about having their future in the hands of a non-Chinese.

    It’s also about trust, or a lack of it. The Chinese majority cannot trust a non-Chinese PM to work for their interest and not to place the interest of his own race above that of the Chinese. This is not prejudice. Everyone can see how an Indian
    boss would prefer Indian subordinates. This goes all the way down the hierarchy until the whole organisation is almost all-Indian, all-brown. This happens in government, private sectors, even NGO’s.

    Conclusion: Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese.
    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singapore?

    Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with a substantial Chinese-majority.

    The national identity of Singapore should be defined by its multi-racial, multi-religious population. A Singaporean, therefore, has a national as well as a racial identity. He/she can, and should, be proud of both.

    A race-blind, One People Singaporean cannot be achieved. Why?

    Race is about history and ancestry. Forsaking your race is forsaking your history and ancestry. Each of the three major races in Singapore has a long history. Indians and Malays are also identified with religions.

    Most Indians are Hindus. In the case of the Malays, race and religion are intertwined and inseparable. By their own definition, Malays are Muslims. Asking Malays to forget their race would also be asking them to forget their religion of Islam. Is
    this possible?

    The three main races in Singapore have different histories. Malays formed the majority of the inhabitants of this island before the Brits colonised it. After that the Brits opened the island to migration of non-Malays, mostly Chinese and Indians,
    until the Malays became the minority. To this day, Malays consider the non-Malays as ‘pendatang’ ,i.e, guests or sojourners.

    Under British colonial rule, all races were allowed to remain as they were. Now descendants of the ‘pendatang’ want everyone to forget about race. You expect the Malays to accept that? Malays in the region form a solid sea surrounding the
    island of Singapore. Would they see their fellow Malays in Singapore losing their racial identity, thus losing all racial ties with them, and not doing anything about it?

    There will be discrimination and prejudices in a multi-racial, multi-religious society. From time to time, when they get extremes, they will have to be fixed. But going race-blind and religion-blind to fix them would be an overkill, like rebuilding
    a whole house to fix one weak structure.

    Who started all these nonsense about a post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore? It can’t be the Chinese because they form the majority on the island. It can’t be the Malays because to them it would mean losing their religion
    and racially disown themselves from a solid majority in the surrounding region. It’s those cunning Indians who neither form the majority on the island nor the region. They feel inferior in terms of numbers. Therefore, they are keen to disregard race.
    That’s only when they are in Singapore though. In India, they would not disown their race but would enjoy all privileges that come with it. Eventhough India is a very racist country, they would definitely not espouse their idea of a post-racial, race-
    blind, India.

    Only damned fools will be fooled by these cunning Indians.

    There are some Chinese politicians in the Opposition WP who are such fools. In the Last GE, the party fielded a team with a majority of non-Chinese candidates. When the party won, its Chinese leaders claimed that Singaporeans are no more fixated
    with race. It shows how dumb they are. The people are still fixated with race but they are more fixated with having more Opposition voices in Parliament. Moreover, the PAP team was not helm by any heavyweight Minister. It was a 'suicide squad', as the WP
    itself claimed.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness?

    We started off with Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others (CMIO). ‘Others’ include all other ethnicity beside the three main ones. This is already enough, more than enough, of racial diversity and inclusiveness, including the problems which come with
    it. The more racially diverse we become, the more social fault-lines there will be and the more fractious will the country become.

    There have been an obvious increase in the nation’s racial diversity. There was a change in migration policy around mid-1980s which caused an increase in migration of non-Chinese over the following decades. The reason given by the media was that it
    was to make up for the fall of population. But its the Chinese population which was falling due a drop in Chinese fertility rate. Where’s the logic? If it’s Chinese fertility rate that’s falling, more Chinese, not non-Chinese, migration should be
    welcomed.

    Today, on this island, there are so many people of so many different nationalities and ethnicity that people belonging to a particular nationality or ethnicity can be out on the street to stage a big protest on behalf of their nation or ethnicity.

    The racial minorities call for more racial diversity is a cunning ploy to dilute and diminish the Chinese majority in the population. Over the decades, Chinese proportion in Singapore’s population has dropped while those of the other three racial
    groups have risen.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore#Ethnic_groups


    To each of the racial minority, more racial diversity means having more of their own race in the population. It’s been very effective. The demography of Singapore has gone through obvious changes, most obvious of which is the increasing number of
    non-Chinese in the population. The Indians have been most vocal on racial diversity, for cunning reasons. They are neither the majority on the island nor its surrounding region. Their call for racial diversity is made with having more of their own kind
    in mind. Not surprisingly, they are the biggest beneficiaries of racial diversity. There are now many more Indians in Singapore than at any time. So many that they make an Indian Singaporean, international author Pranag Khanna, believes that the future
    of Singapore and the world will be very, very brown.

    If it were to be the other way around, where the proportion of the racial minorities in the population drops while that of the Chinese rises, the minorities would cry out till them drop about “Racism!”.
    Mixed marriage?

    The racial minorities support and encourage mixed marriage of a Chinese female to a non-Chinese male resulting in a racial and gender bias in mixed marriages in Singapore – non-Chinese males marrying Chinese females.

    https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=singapore+mixed+marriage&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjjyfyntNH0AhVXi9gFHSNMBw8Q2-cCegQIABAA&oq=singapore+mixed+marriage&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoECAAQQzoFCAAQgARQjgpYuUVgl2VoAHAAeACAAZIBiAHTCJIBAzcuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&
    sclient=img&ei=0y2vYaOUGdeW4t4Po5ideA&bih=524&biw=1120

    To the racial minority, this means one more for their race and one fewer for the Chinese. When an Indian male marries a Chinese female, the wife and off-springs will be Indianised. When a Malay male, who would also be a Muslim, marries a Chinese female,
    the wife would first have to be converted to Islam. Their off-springs would become Muslims.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=singapore+mixed+marriage

    Looking at the photos, there is also a skin color bias. Most of the pairings are dark-skinned males with fair-skinned females.

    In India, Muslim men are accused of enticing Hindu women into marriages in a ‘Love Jihad’. In Singapore, are Chinese women being enticed by non-Chinese men into marriages of ‘Love Racism’? Those non-Chinese men only doing it for their race?

    Of course there are mixed marriages which do not fit the general rules mentioned but they are the exceptions. They are the wrath of the racial minorities.


    Expand the ‘common space’ of Western culture and English Language?

    This is not about accepting or rejecting the English language. This language is currently the international lingua franca and it carries high economic values. It’s benefits to Singapore so far has been undeniable. It’s already a prevalent language
    in Singapore. How much more space should it deserve? Should it become the only language used publicly everywhere on the island?


    Racists among the racial minorities are not satisfied. They want to use English to destroy the Chinese language, and with it, Chinese culture. For that, they espouse the cunning ruse of ‘widening the common space’ of English. They want it to be the
    language used at home, in private gatherings and in all public places. Building names, company names, business signboards, even signboards for food sold, cooked or uncooked, must be in English only.


    They have sympathetic hears from the government. Singapore’s first PM, LKY, was born during the British colonial era. He grew up to become an English-and-England-educated Anglophile. When the racial minorities wanted to expand the ‘common space’ of
    English, he and his government was ready to help them along.
    The importance of English should not be over-emphasised. It’s growing space should not come at the expense of ethnic languages. This would be against multi-culturalism which is part of multi-racialism. Knowing a language is a skill. Being multi-lingual
    is better than being mono-lingual. For Singaporeans, how much importance to attach to which language should depend on the world outside. Singapore should look outwards to the world and adapt to its changes.


    In the 21st Century, a rising and rejuvenated China has seen a resurgence of Mandarin around the world. More and more people all over the world are learning and using Mandarin. Many countries have allocated space, in electronics as well as physical form,
    for Mandarin. To start with, it helps to attract Chinese tourists to these countries. In SG, Chinese tourists have topped the list of visitors for years now. Chinese investments around the world, especially in South-east Asia will increase. The space
    for Mandarin should be increased. Expanding the ‘common space’ for Mandarin along with that of English would be wiser.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Sat Dec 11 05:36:03 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    The economy becomes a showcase for racial politics. It is run by a more racially and internationally diverse workforce but remains stuck within the low single digit range. Nothing much to show for unless we want to be proud of a Changi
    Business Park which is almost full of Indians.
    Politically, Chinese-majority rule is being challenged more frequently and intensely by the minorities.

    The Chinese in Singapore are demoralised, to the extent that they do not want to reproduce. They are pessimistic about the future. They foresee their children living in a non-Chinese majority Singapore. It will be a brown Singapore, even a
    brown world, as predicted by an Indian-Singaporean international author Parag Khanna.


    It’s time to stop and reverse course on minority racism. Chinese-ness and Chinese-majority rule in Singapore should be unchallenged. Otherwise Singapore’s future will be bleak and brown.
    Chinese-ness and Chinese-majority in Singapore are being increasingly challenged by whatever devious and cunning means the racial minorities can think of.

    Just to list a few.

    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore.
    A non-Chinese Prime Minister.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness.
    Mixed marriages.
    Expand the ‘common space’ of Western culture and English Language.


    Let’s start off with the second item on the list which is currently a hot-button, sensitive issue, especially to the racial minorities.

    A non-Chinese PM for Singapore?

    A police report was put up against ex-DPM Heng over his remark on this issue, which displeased the racial minorities. This issue is not only raised and discussed within Singapore. It has become an international issue. Foreign media talk and
    write about it. Even ex-President Trump of the US had openly, in front of an international media, asked Singapore’s current PM about it, during the latter’s last visit to the US. (This is foreign interference. Shanmugam, with his FICA, should ensure
    that no foreigners meddle with this issue, within or beyond Singapore). The answer from LHL to Trump was a firm “No”.

    Before this, LHL had said:
    “Singapore may have a non-Chinese prime minister one day but that is unlikely to happen any time soon.”

    https://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20081108-99242.html


    Ex-DPM HSK: Older generations of Singaporeans not ready for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://www.ntu.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ntu/media-hub/0378-finance-minister-heng-swee-keat-speaks-at-ntu-students-union-ministerial-forum/malaymail_190329_minister-older-generation-of-singaporeans-not-ready-for-non-chinese-pm.pdf?sfvrsn=
    2190a1b7_2

    Just hours after his speech, a police report was lodged against him by a member of the racial minority. Reason? He has hurt the sensitivities of the racial minorities!

    Latest opinion from LW: Minority PM is OK.

    https://mustsharenews.com/lawrence-wong-minority-pm/


    Surveys have shown that each race would prefer a member of its own race to be the PM. It shows that racial identity is strong. That’s natural. That’s reality. LW thinks this is wrong and he is going to change it.

    The Opposition:
    It has become an issue for adversarial politics. To oppose for the sake of opposing, the Opposition is for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/mothership_spore-public-ready-for-non-chinese-pm-psps-hazel-poa-and-wps-gerald-giam_250121.pdf

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j72bKAsoeY8



    Why not put it succinctly - Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese. Why?

    Singapore is a Chinese-majority ruled nation. This would be meaningless if its ruler, which under the current political system is the Prime Minister, is not Chinese.

    Many would scream: “It should be based on capability and performance!”. Agree. But what determines capability and performance? Being able to govern the country well. Governing a Chinese-majority Singapore means being able to communicate
    with , relate to and motivate the Chinese-majority in the population. Who can do it better than a Chinese? This is meritocracy. A Chinese would naturally have the merits of being able to lead the majority of Singaporeans, who are Chinese.

    It’s also about fairness. The country depends more on the Chinese than all the other races combined. In times of peace, it’s depends most on the Chinese to drive the economy and maintain social order. In times of war, it depends most on the
    Chinese for its defence. Its only fair that a Chinese should lead the country.

    It’s also about security. The Chinese majority will not feel secure about having their future in the hands of a non-Chinese.

    It’s also about trust, or a lack of it. The Chinese majority cannot trust a non-Chinese PM to work for their interest and not to place the interest of his own race above that of the Chinese. This is not prejudice. Everyone can see how an
    Indian boss would prefer Indian subordinates. This goes all the way down the hierarchy until the whole organisation is almost all-Indian, all-brown. This happens in government, private sectors, even NGO’s.

    Conclusion: Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese.
    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singapore?

    Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with a substantial Chinese-majority.

    The national identity of Singapore should be defined by its multi-racial, multi-religious population. A Singaporean, therefore, has a national as well as a racial identity. He/she can, and should, be proud of both.

    A race-blind, One People Singaporean cannot be achieved. Why?

    Race is about history and ancestry. Forsaking your race is forsaking your history and ancestry. Each of the three major races in Singapore has a long history. Indians and Malays are also identified with religions.

    Most Indians are Hindus. In the case of the Malays, race and religion are intertwined and inseparable. By their own definition, Malays are Muslims. Asking Malays to forget their race would also be asking them to forget their religion of Islam. Is
    this possible?

    The three main races in Singapore have different histories. Malays formed the majority of the inhabitants of this island before the Brits colonised it. After that the Brits opened the island to migration of non-Malays, mostly Chinese and Indians,
    until the Malays became the minority. To this day, Malays consider the non-Malays as ‘pendatang’ ,i.e, guests or sojourners.

    Under British colonial rule, all races were allowed to remain as they were. Now descendants of the ‘pendatang’ want everyone to forget about race. You expect the Malays to accept that? Malays in the region form a solid sea surrounding the
    island of Singapore. Would they see their fellow Malays in Singapore losing their racial identity, thus losing all racial ties with them, and not doing anything about it?

    There will be discrimination and prejudices in a multi-racial, multi-religious society. From time to time, when they get extremes, they will have to be fixed. But going race-blind and religion-blind to fix them would be an overkill, like
    rebuilding a whole house to fix one weak structure.

    Who started all these nonsense about a post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore? It can’t be the Chinese because they form the majority on the island. It can’t be the Malays because to them it would mean losing their
    religion and racially disown themselves from a solid majority in the surrounding region. It’s those cunning Indians who neither form the majority on the island nor the region. They feel inferior in terms of numbers. Therefore, they are keen to
    disregard race. That’s only when they are in Singapore though. In India, they would not disown their race but would enjoy all privileges that come with it. Eventhough India is a very racist country, they would definitely not espouse their idea of a
    post-racial, race-blind, India.

    Only damned fools will be fooled by these cunning Indians.

    There are some Chinese politicians in the Opposition WP who are such fools. In the Last GE, the party fielded a team with a majority of non-Chinese candidates. When the party won, its Chinese leaders claimed that Singaporeans are no more fixated
    with race. It shows how dumb they are. The people are still fixated with race but they are more fixated with having more Opposition voices in Parliament. Moreover, the PAP team was not helm by any heavyweight Minister. It was a 'suicide squad', as the WP
    itself claimed.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness?

    We started off with Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others (CMIO). ‘Others’ include all other ethnicity beside the three main ones. This is already enough, more than enough, of racial diversity and inclusiveness, including the problems which come
    with it. The more racially diverse we become, the more social fault-lines there will be and the more fractious will the country become.

    There have been an obvious increase in the nation’s racial diversity. There was a change in migration policy around mid-1980s which caused an increase in migration of non-Chinese over the following decades. The reason given by the media was that
    it was to make up for the fall of population. But its the Chinese population which was falling due a drop in Chinese fertility rate. Where’s the logic? If it’s Chinese fertility rate that’s falling, more Chinese, not non-Chinese, migration should
    be welcomed.

    Today, on this island, there are so many people of so many different nationalities and ethnicity that people belonging to a particular nationality or ethnicity can be out on the street to stage a big protest on behalf of their nation or ethnicity.

    The racial minorities call for more racial diversity is a cunning ploy to dilute and diminish the Chinese majority in the population. Over the decades, Chinese proportion in Singapore’s population has dropped while those of the other three racial
    groups have risen.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore#Ethnic_groups


    To each of the racial minority, more racial diversity means having more of their own race in the population. It’s been very effective. The demography of Singapore has gone through obvious changes, most obvious of which is the increasing number of
    non-Chinese in the population. The Indians have been most vocal on racial diversity, for cunning reasons. They are neither the majority on the island nor its surrounding region. Their call for racial diversity is made with having more of their own kind
    in mind. Not surprisingly, they are the biggest beneficiaries of racial diversity. There are now many more Indians in Singapore than at any time. So many that they make an Indian Singaporean, international author Pranag Khanna, believes that the future
    of Singapore and the world will be very, very brown.

    If it were to be the other way around, where the proportion of the racial minorities in the population drops while that of the Chinese rises, the minorities would cry out till them drop about “Racism!”.
    Mixed marriage?

    The racial minorities support and encourage mixed marriage of a Chinese female to a non-Chinese male resulting in a racial and gender bias in mixed marriages in Singapore – non-Chinese males marrying Chinese females.

    https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=singapore+mixed+marriage&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjjyfyntNH0AhVXi9gFHSNMBw8Q2-cCegQIABAA&oq=singapore+mixed+marriage&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoECAAQQzoFCAAQgARQjgpYuUVgl2VoAHAAeACAAZIBiAHTCJIBAzcuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&
    sclient=img&ei=0y2vYaOUGdeW4t4Po5ideA&bih=524&biw=1120

    To the racial minority, this means one more for their race and one fewer for the Chinese. When an Indian male marries a Chinese female, the wife and off-springs will be Indianised. When a Malay male, who would also be a Muslim, marries a Chinese
    female, the wife would first have to be converted to Islam. Their off-springs would become Muslims.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=singapore+mixed+marriage

    Looking at the photos, there is also a skin color bias. Most of the pairings are dark-skinned males with fair-skinned females.

    In India, Muslim men are accused of enticing Hindu women into marriages in a ‘Love Jihad’. In Singapore, are Chinese women being enticed by non-Chinese men into marriages of ‘Love Racism’? Those non-Chinese men only doing it for their race?

    Of course there are mixed marriages which do not fit the general rules mentioned but they are the exceptions. They are the wrath of the racial minorities.
    Expand the ‘common space’ of Western culture and English Language?

    This is not about accepting or rejecting the English language. This language is currently the international lingua franca and it carries high economic values. It’s benefits to Singapore so far has been undeniable. It’s already a prevalent language
    in Singapore. How much more space should it deserve? Should it become the only language used publicly everywhere on the island?


    Racists among the racial minorities are not satisfied. They want to use English to destroy the Chinese language, and with it, Chinese culture. For that, they espouse the cunning ruse of ‘widening the common space’ of English. They want it to be the
    language used at home, in private gatherings and in all public places. Building names, company names, business signboards, even signboards for food sold, cooked or uncooked, must be in English only.


    They have sympathetic hears from the government. Singapore’s first PM, LKY, was born during the British colonial era. He grew up to become an English-and-England-educated Anglophile. When the racial minorities wanted to expand the ‘common space’
    of English, he and his government was ready to help them along.
    The importance of English should not be over-emphasised. It’s growing space should not come at the expense of ethnic languages. This would be against multi-culturalism which is part of multi-racialism. Knowing a language is a skill. Being multi-
    lingual is better than being mono-lingual. For Singaporeans, how much importance to attach to which language should depend on the world outside. Singapore should look outwards to the world and adapt to its changes.


    In the 21st Century, a rising and rejuvenated China has seen a resurgence of Mandarin around the world. More and more people all over the world are learning and using Mandarin. Many countries have allocated space, in electronics as well as physical
    form, for Mandarin. To start with, it helps to attract Chinese tourists to these countries. In SG, Chinese tourists have topped the list of visitors for years now. Chinese investments around the world, especially in South-east Asia will increase. The
    space for Mandarin should be increased. Expanding the ‘common space’ for Mandarin along with that of English would be wiser.

    Moving Singapore away from China?

    Under the politics of minority racism, each racial minority would prefer that Singapore be close to the nations of its ancestry. Indians would like Singapore to be ruled from India. The Malays would prefer that Singapore become a State of the Malaysian
    Federation once again. None of them would want to see Singapore getting close to China.

    In the past, a Chinese Singaporean speaking up for China and Chinese culture would be labeled as chauvinist and Communist. That Cold War period is over. China is no more that poor and weak Communist nation which aimed to export Communism to the Third
    World. It is now the world’s top economy by PPP and second by other measures. This is another giant whose shoulder Singapore should stand on. But the politics of minority racism is standing in the way.

    When China was a poor and weak country, those racial minorities were glad that Chinese-majority Singapore kept a distance from China. This reduces China’s influence on Singapore and makes it easy for the locals to de-Sinicise Singapore. With a rising
    China, they have adopted a cunning racist reasoning, coupled with sarcasm, for Singapore to continue to keep itself away from China. It is this:

    “A Chinese majority Singapore will easily come under China’s influence.” “PRC Chinese will migrate to Singapore to overwhelm the other races.” “Singapore will become Chinapore.”
    “Non-Chinese will become second-class citizens in Singapore.”

    Ethnic Indian Ministers in government are more suspicious of Chinese Singaporeans. They believe that China would use Chinese in Singapore to influence and interfere in Singapore’s internal affairs. Those Chinese Singaporeans who support China and
    Chinese culture are accused of being and spies and agents for China. There are ethnic Indian Ministers who express their concerns even over the increasing hours of Mandarin lessons in schools.

    Not a single Indian, and never will there ever be one, who will express any concern about the increasing number of Indians in Singapore and how India will use them to serve its interest. On the contrary, they are pleased and excited by it all. In fact,
    one of them, an international author Parnag Khanna, is so excited by the increasing presence and influence of Indians in Singapore that it has led him to believe that “the future of the world will be very, very, brown”, like what he has seen in
    Singapore.

    The politics of minority racism should not be allowed to stand in the way of Singapore and China getting closer together.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Sun Dec 12 06:54:09 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    Throughout the past few decades, this nation has been indulging in the politics of minority racism - racial minorities fighting for their own racial interests and government drawing up and implementing policies to appease them.

    Minority racism is anti-majority racism. The most obvious result of it is that Singapore has become less Chinese. The population has become more racially diverse with more non-Chinese. In addition, Western cultures and the English language
    have become prevalent.

    What’s Singapore’s future in all these? What have decades of minority racism brought to this country?
    The society has more non-Chinese, especially Indians. It has become more fractious with more racial disputes, with the racial majority being victims of murderous crimes committed by the racial minorities.
    The economy becomes a showcase for racial politics. It is run by a more racially and internationally diverse workforce but remains stuck within the low single digit range. Nothing much to show for unless we want to be proud of a Changi
    Business Park which is almost full of Indians.
    Politically, Chinese-majority rule is being challenged more frequently and intensely by the minorities.

    The Chinese in Singapore are demoralised, to the extent that they do not want to reproduce. They are pessimistic about the future. They foresee their children living in a non-Chinese majority Singapore. It will be a brown Singapore, even a
    brown world, as predicted by an Indian-Singaporean international author Parag Khanna.


    It’s time to stop and reverse course on minority racism. Chinese-ness and Chinese-majority rule in Singapore should be unchallenged. Otherwise Singapore’s future will be bleak and brown.
    Chinese-ness and Chinese-majority in Singapore are being increasingly challenged by whatever devious and cunning means the racial minorities can think of.

    Just to list a few.

    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore.
    A non-Chinese Prime Minister.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness.
    Mixed marriages.
    Expand the ‘common space’ of Western culture and English Language.


    Let’s start off with the second item on the list which is currently a hot-button, sensitive issue, especially to the racial minorities.

    A non-Chinese PM for Singapore?

    A police report was put up against ex-DPM Heng over his remark on this issue, which displeased the racial minorities. This issue is not only raised and discussed within Singapore. It has become an international issue. Foreign media talk and
    write about it. Even ex-President Trump of the US had openly, in front of an international media, asked Singapore’s current PM about it, during the latter’s last visit to the US. (This is foreign interference. Shanmugam, with his FICA, should ensure
    that no foreigners meddle with this issue, within or beyond Singapore). The answer from LHL to Trump was a firm “No”.

    Before this, LHL had said:
    “Singapore may have a non-Chinese prime minister one day but that is unlikely to happen any time soon.”

    https://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20081108-99242.html


    Ex-DPM HSK: Older generations of Singaporeans not ready for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://www.ntu.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ntu/media-hub/0378-finance-minister-heng-swee-keat-speaks-at-ntu-students-union-ministerial-forum/malaymail_190329_minister-older-generation-of-singaporeans-not-ready-for-non-chinese-pm.pdf?sfvrsn=
    2190a1b7_2

    Just hours after his speech, a police report was lodged against him by a member of the racial minority. Reason? He has hurt the sensitivities of the racial minorities!

    Latest opinion from LW: Minority PM is OK.

    https://mustsharenews.com/lawrence-wong-minority-pm/


    Surveys have shown that each race would prefer a member of its own race to be the PM. It shows that racial identity is strong. That’s natural. That’s reality. LW thinks this is wrong and he is going to change it.

    The Opposition:
    It has become an issue for adversarial politics. To oppose for the sake of opposing, the Opposition is for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/mothership_spore-public-ready-for-non-chinese-pm-psps-hazel-poa-and-wps-gerald-giam_250121.pdf

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j72bKAsoeY8



    Why not put it succinctly - Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese. Why?

    Singapore is a Chinese-majority ruled nation. This would be meaningless if its ruler, which under the current political system is the Prime Minister, is not Chinese.

    Many would scream: “It should be based on capability and performance!”. Agree. But what determines capability and performance? Being able to govern the country well. Governing a Chinese-majority Singapore means being able to communicate
    with , relate to and motivate the Chinese-majority in the population. Who can do it better than a Chinese? This is meritocracy. A Chinese would naturally have the merits of being able to lead the majority of Singaporeans, who are Chinese.

    It’s also about fairness. The country depends more on the Chinese than all the other races combined. In times of peace, it’s depends most on the Chinese to drive the economy and maintain social order. In times of war, it depends most on
    the Chinese for its defence. Its only fair that a Chinese should lead the country.

    It’s also about security. The Chinese majority will not feel secure about having their future in the hands of a non-Chinese.

    It’s also about trust, or a lack of it. The Chinese majority cannot trust a non-Chinese PM to work for their interest and not to place the interest of his own race above that of the Chinese. This is not prejudice. Everyone can see how an
    Indian boss would prefer Indian subordinates. This goes all the way down the hierarchy until the whole organisation is almost all-Indian, all-brown. This happens in government, private sectors, even NGO’s.

    Conclusion: Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese.
    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singapore?

    Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with a substantial Chinese-majority.

    The national identity of Singapore should be defined by its multi-racial, multi-religious population. A Singaporean, therefore, has a national as well as a racial identity. He/she can, and should, be proud of both.

    A race-blind, One People Singaporean cannot be achieved. Why?

    Race is about history and ancestry. Forsaking your race is forsaking your history and ancestry. Each of the three major races in Singapore has a long history. Indians and Malays are also identified with religions.

    Most Indians are Hindus. In the case of the Malays, race and religion are intertwined and inseparable. By their own definition, Malays are Muslims. Asking Malays to forget their race would also be asking them to forget their religion of Islam.
    Is this possible?

    The three main races in Singapore have different histories. Malays formed the majority of the inhabitants of this island before the Brits colonised it. After that the Brits opened the island to migration of non-Malays, mostly Chinese and
    Indians, until the Malays became the minority. To this day, Malays consider the non-Malays as ‘pendatang’ ,i.e, guests or sojourners.

    Under British colonial rule, all races were allowed to remain as they were. Now descendants of the ‘pendatang’ want everyone to forget about race. You expect the Malays to accept that? Malays in the region form a solid sea surrounding the
    island of Singapore. Would they see their fellow Malays in Singapore losing their racial identity, thus losing all racial ties with them, and not doing anything about it?

    There will be discrimination and prejudices in a multi-racial, multi-religious society. From time to time, when they get extremes, they will have to be fixed. But going race-blind and religion-blind to fix them would be an overkill, like
    rebuilding a whole house to fix one weak structure.

    Who started all these nonsense about a post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore? It can’t be the Chinese because they form the majority on the island. It can’t be the Malays because to them it would mean losing their
    religion and racially disown themselves from a solid majority in the surrounding region. It’s those cunning Indians who neither form the majority on the island nor the region. They feel inferior in terms of numbers. Therefore, they are keen to
    disregard race. That’s only when they are in Singapore though. In India, they would not disown their race but would enjoy all privileges that come with it. Eventhough India is a very racist country, they would definitely not espouse their idea of a
    post-racial, race-blind, India.

    Only damned fools will be fooled by these cunning Indians.

    There are some Chinese politicians in the Opposition WP who are such fools. In the Last GE, the party fielded a team with a majority of non-Chinese candidates. When the party won, its Chinese leaders claimed that Singaporeans are no more
    fixated with race. It shows how dumb they are. The people are still fixated with race but they are more fixated with having more Opposition voices in Parliament. Moreover, the PAP team was not helm by any heavyweight Minister. It was a 'suicide squad',
    as the WP itself claimed.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness?

    We started off with Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others (CMIO). ‘Others’ include all other ethnicity beside the three main ones. This is already enough, more than enough, of racial diversity and inclusiveness, including the problems which come
    with it. The more racially diverse we become, the more social fault-lines there will be and the more fractious will the country become.

    There have been an obvious increase in the nation’s racial diversity. There was a change in migration policy around mid-1980s which caused an increase in migration of non-Chinese over the following decades. The reason given by the media was
    that it was to make up for the fall of population. But its the Chinese population which was falling due a drop in Chinese fertility rate. Where’s the logic? If it’s Chinese fertility rate that’s falling, more Chinese, not non-Chinese, migration
    should be welcomed.

    Today, on this island, there are so many people of so many different nationalities and ethnicity that people belonging to a particular nationality or ethnicity can be out on the street to stage a big protest on behalf of their nation or ethnicity.


    The racial minorities call for more racial diversity is a cunning ploy to dilute and diminish the Chinese majority in the population. Over the decades, Chinese proportion in Singapore’s population has dropped while those of the other three
    racial groups have risen.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore#Ethnic_groups


    To each of the racial minority, more racial diversity means having more of their own race in the population. It’s been very effective. The demography of Singapore has gone through obvious changes, most obvious of which is the increasing number
    of non-Chinese in the population. The Indians have been most vocal on racial diversity, for cunning reasons. They are neither the majority on the island nor its surrounding region. Their call for racial diversity is made with having more of their own
    kind in mind. Not surprisingly, they are the biggest beneficiaries of racial diversity. There are now many more Indians in Singapore than at any time. So many that they make an Indian Singaporean, international author Pranag Khanna, believes that the
    future of Singapore and the world will be very, very brown.

    If it were to be the other way around, where the proportion of the racial minorities in the population drops while that of the Chinese rises, the minorities would cry out till them drop about “Racism!”.
    Mixed marriage?

    The racial minorities support and encourage mixed marriage of a Chinese female to a non-Chinese male resulting in a racial and gender bias in mixed marriages in Singapore – non-Chinese males marrying Chinese females.

    https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=singapore+mixed+marriage&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjjyfyntNH0AhVXi9gFHSNMBw8Q2-cCegQIABAA&oq=singapore+mixed+marriage&gs_lcp=
    CgNpbWcQAzoECAAQQzoFCAAQgARQjgpYuUVgl2VoAHAAeACAAZIBiAHTCJIBAzcuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=0y2vYaOUGdeW4t4Po5ideA&bih=524&biw=1120

    To the racial minority, this means one more for their race and one fewer for the Chinese. When an Indian male marries a Chinese female, the wife and off-springs will be Indianised. When a Malay male, who would also be a Muslim, marries a Chinese
    female, the wife would first have to be converted to Islam. Their off-springs would become Muslims.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=singapore+mixed+marriage

    Looking at the photos, there is also a skin color bias. Most of the pairings are dark-skinned males with fair-skinned females.

    In India, Muslim men are accused of enticing Hindu women into marriages in a ‘Love Jihad’. In Singapore, are Chinese women being enticed by non-Chinese men into marriages of ‘Love Racism’? Those non-Chinese men only doing it for their race?

    Of course there are mixed marriages which do not fit the general rules mentioned but they are the exceptions. They are the wrath of the racial minorities.
    Expand the ‘common space’ of Western culture and English Language?

    This is not about accepting or rejecting the English language. This language is currently the international lingua franca and it carries high economic values. It’s benefits to Singapore so far has been undeniable. It’s already a prevalent
    language in Singapore. How much more space should it deserve? Should it become the only language used publicly everywhere on the island?


    Racists among the racial minorities are not satisfied. They want to use English to destroy the Chinese language, and with it, Chinese culture. For that, they espouse the cunning ruse of ‘widening the common space’ of English. They want it to be
    the language used at home, in private gatherings and in all public places. Building names, company names, business signboards, even signboards for food sold, cooked or uncooked, must be in English only.


    They have sympathetic hears from the government. Singapore’s first PM, LKY, was born during the British colonial era. He grew up to become an English-and-England-educated Anglophile. When the racial minorities wanted to expand the ‘common space’
    of English, he and his government was ready to help them along.
    The importance of English should not be over-emphasised. It’s growing space should not come at the expense of ethnic languages. This would be against multi-culturalism which is part of multi-racialism. Knowing a language is a skill. Being multi-
    lingual is better than being mono-lingual. For Singaporeans, how much importance to attach to which language should depend on the world outside. Singapore should look outwards to the world and adapt to its changes.


    In the 21st Century, a rising and rejuvenated China has seen a resurgence of Mandarin around the world. More and more people all over the world are learning and using Mandarin. Many countries have allocated space, in electronics as well as physical
    form, for Mandarin. To start with, it helps to attract Chinese tourists to these countries. In SG, Chinese tourists have topped the list of visitors for years now. Chinese investments around the world, especially in South-east Asia will increase. The
    space for Mandarin should be increased. Expanding the ‘common space’ for Mandarin along with that of English would be wiser.
    Moving Singapore away from China?

    Under the politics of minority racism, each racial minority would prefer that Singapore be close to the nations of its ancestry. Indians would like Singapore to be ruled from India. The Malays would prefer that Singapore become a State of the Malaysian
    Federation once again. None of them would want to see Singapore getting close to China.

    In the past, a Chinese Singaporean speaking up for China and Chinese culture would be labeled as chauvinist and Communist. That Cold War period is over. China is no more that poor and weak Communist nation which aimed to export Communism to the Third
    World. It is now the world’s top economy by PPP and second by other measures. This is another giant whose shoulder Singapore should stand on. But the politics of minority racism is standing in the way.

    When China was a poor and weak country, those racial minorities were glad that Chinese-majority Singapore kept a distance from China. This reduces China’s influence on Singapore and makes it easy for the locals to de-Sinicise Singapore. With a rising
    China, they have adopted a cunning racist reasoning, coupled with sarcasm, for Singapore to continue to keep itself away from China. It is this:

    “A Chinese majority Singapore will easily come under China’s influence.”
    “PRC Chinese will migrate to Singapore to overwhelm the other races.” “Singapore will become Chinapore.”
    “Non-Chinese will become second-class citizens in Singapore.”

    Ethnic Indian Ministers in government are more suspicious of Chinese Singaporeans. They believe that China would use Chinese in Singapore to influence and interfere in Singapore’s internal affairs. Those Chinese Singaporeans who support China and
    Chinese culture are accused of being and spies and agents for China. There are ethnic Indian Ministers who express their concerns even over the increasing hours of Mandarin lessons in schools.

    Not a single Indian, and never will there ever be one, who will express any concern about the increasing number of Indians in Singapore and how India will use them to serve its interest. On the contrary, they are pleased and excited by it all. In fact,
    one of them, an international author Parnag Khanna, is so excited by the increasing presence and influence of Indians in Singapore that it has led him to believe that “the future of the world will be very, very, brown”, like what he has seen in
    Singapore.

    The politics of minority racism should not be allowed to stand in the way of Singapore and China getting closer together.





    What will happen to Chinese-majority Singapore if the racial minorities have their way?

    If the politics of minority racism continues until it triumphs, Singapore will become a very different nation than it is now. It will be a Singapore in which the Chinese will not form a substantial proportion of the population, may be just another race
    among many races and all sorts of mixed races, where everyone is Westernised culturally and speaks only English. And all these will happen under the watch of a non-Chinese Prime Minister.

    Global politics is conducive to such happenings. The US is in competition and confrontation against China. It is wary of Chinese everywhere. A nation like Singapore with a Chinese-majority attracts the US’s special attention. It would want to change
    the national character of Singapore, making it less Chinese. India is a favorite of the US as a counterbalance against China. The US would want Singaporean Indians to have more power and influence locally. The Indians here will be more than delighted to
    collaborate and collude with the US. It fits their racist motto of “Rather a White- than a Yellow-man slave be”. The US would prefer an Indian PM for Singapore. Ex-President Trump has raised the issue of a non-Chinese PM with LHL who responded with
    a firm “No”. That won’t stop the US. It will continue to pile the pressure on Singapore’s Chinese leadership. With Singapore so dependent on the US, an Indian PM of Singapore may happen sooner than expected.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Tue Dec 28 19:14:19 2021
    [continued from previous message]

    What Singapore had been through. A British colony. Japanese invasion and occupation. Return to British rule. As a part of Malaysia. Separation and Independence from Malaysia. Throughout all these, it’s the Chinese who had endured the
    most sufferings and made the most contributions and sacrifices. It’s through these that they earn the right to rule, not merely because they are the majority by numbers.



    What will be Singapore’s future problems?

    Will the racial minorities continue to accept a Singapore of Chinese-majority rule?

    Will the racial minorities accept a closer relationship between Singapore and a rising China?


    How many more National Days Singapore will have will depend on how well it manages its multiracialism, with Chinese -majority rule.
    All these talks and TV shows about identity politics, race, racism etc. in Singapore, are beating about the bush. Let’s cut to the chase and get to the points.

    Throughout the past few decades, this nation has been indulging in the politics of minority racism - racial minorities fighting for their own racial interests and government drawing up and implementing policies to appease them.

    Minority racism is anti-majority racism. The most obvious result of it is that Singapore has become less Chinese. The population has become more racially diverse with more non-Chinese. In addition, Western cultures and the English
    language have become prevalent.

    What’s Singapore’s future in all these? What have decades of minority racism brought to this country?
    The society has more non-Chinese, especially Indians. It has become more fractious with more racial disputes, with the racial majority being victims of murderous crimes committed by the racial minorities.
    The economy becomes a showcase for racial politics. It is run by a more racially and internationally diverse workforce but remains stuck within the low single digit range. Nothing much to show for unless we want to be proud of a Changi
    Business Park which is almost full of Indians.
    Politically, Chinese-majority rule is being challenged more frequently and intensely by the minorities.

    The Chinese in Singapore are demoralised, to the extent that they do not want to reproduce. They are pessimistic about the future. They foresee their children living in a non-Chinese majority Singapore. It will be a brown Singapore, even
    a brown world, as predicted by an Indian-Singaporean international author Parag Khanna.


    It’s time to stop and reverse course on minority racism. Chinese-ness and Chinese-majority rule in Singapore should be unchallenged. Otherwise Singapore’s future will be bleak and brown.
    Chinese-ness and Chinese-majority in Singapore are being increasingly challenged by whatever devious and cunning means the racial minorities can think of.

    Just to list a few.

    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore.
    A non-Chinese Prime Minister.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness.
    Mixed marriages.
    Expand the ‘common space’ of Western culture and English Language.


    Let’s start off with the second item on the list which is currently a hot-button, sensitive issue, especially to the racial minorities.

    A non-Chinese PM for Singapore?

    A police report was put up against ex-DPM Heng over his remark on this issue, which displeased the racial minorities. This issue is not only raised and discussed within Singapore. It has become an international issue. Foreign media talk and
    write about it. Even ex-President Trump of the US had openly, in front of an international media, asked Singapore’s current PM about it, during the latter’s last visit to the US. (This is foreign interference. Shanmugam, with his FICA, should ensure
    that no foreigners meddle with this issue, within or beyond Singapore). The answer from LHL to Trump was a firm “No”.

    Before this, LHL had said:
    “Singapore may have a non-Chinese prime minister one day but that is unlikely to happen any time soon.”

    https://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20081108-99242.html


    Ex-DPM HSK: Older generations of Singaporeans not ready for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://www.ntu.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ntu/media-hub/0378-finance-minister-heng-swee-keat-speaks-at-ntu-students-union-ministerial-forum/malaymail_190329_minister-older-generation-of-singaporeans-not-ready-for-non-chinese-pm.pdf?sfvrsn=
    2190a1b7_2

    Just hours after his speech, a police report was lodged against him by a member of the racial minority. Reason? He has hurt the sensitivities of the racial minorities!

    Latest opinion from LW: Minority PM is OK.

    https://mustsharenews.com/lawrence-wong-minority-pm/


    Surveys have shown that each race would prefer a member of its own race to be the PM. It shows that racial identity is strong. That’s natural. That’s reality. LW thinks this is wrong and he is going to change it.

    The Opposition:
    It has become an issue for adversarial politics. To oppose for the sake of opposing, the Opposition is for a non-Chinese PM.

    https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/mothership_spore-public-ready-for-non-chinese-pm-psps-hazel-poa-and-wps-gerald-giam_250121.pdf

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j72bKAsoeY8



    Why not put it succinctly - Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese. Why?

    Singapore is a Chinese-majority ruled nation. This would be meaningless if its ruler, which under the current political system is the Prime Minister, is not Chinese.

    Many would scream: “It should be based on capability and performance!”. Agree. But what determines capability and performance? Being able to govern the country well. Governing a Chinese-majority Singapore means being able to communicate
    with , relate to and motivate the Chinese-majority in the population. Who can do it better than a Chinese? This is meritocracy. A Chinese would naturally have the merits of being able to lead the majority of Singaporeans, who are Chinese.

    It’s also about fairness. The country depends more on the Chinese than all the other races combined. In times of peace, it’s depends most on the Chinese to drive the economy and maintain social order. In times of war, it depends most on
    the Chinese for its defence. Its only fair that a Chinese should lead the country.

    It’s also about security. The Chinese majority will not feel secure about having their future in the hands of a non-Chinese.

    It’s also about trust, or a lack of it. The Chinese majority cannot trust a non-Chinese PM to work for their interest and not to place the interest of his own race above that of the Chinese. This is not prejudice. Everyone can see how an
    Indian boss would prefer Indian subordinates. This goes all the way down the hierarchy until the whole organisation is almost all-Indian, all-brown. This happens in government, private sectors, even NGO’s.

    Conclusion: Singapore’s PM must be a Chinese.
    A post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singapore?

    Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-religious nation with a substantial Chinese-majority.

    The national identity of Singapore should be defined by its multi-racial, multi-religious population. A Singaporean, therefore, has a national as well as a racial identity. He/she can, and should, be proud of both.

    A race-blind, One People Singaporean cannot be achieved. Why?

    Race is about history and ancestry. Forsaking your race is forsaking your history and ancestry. Each of the three major races in Singapore has a long history. Indians and Malays are also identified with religions.

    Most Indians are Hindus. In the case of the Malays, race and religion are intertwined and inseparable. By their own definition, Malays are Muslims. Asking Malays to forget their race would also be asking them to forget their religion of Islam.
    Is this possible?

    The three main races in Singapore have different histories. Malays formed the majority of the inhabitants of this island before the Brits colonised it. After that the Brits opened the island to migration of non-Malays, mostly Chinese and
    Indians, until the Malays became the minority. To this day, Malays consider the non-Malays as ‘pendatang’ ,i.e, guests or sojourners.

    Under British colonial rule, all races were allowed to remain as they were. Now descendants of the ‘pendatang’ want everyone to forget about race. You expect the Malays to accept that? Malays in the region form a solid sea surrounding the
    island of Singapore. Would they see their fellow Malays in Singapore losing their racial identity, thus losing all racial ties with them, and not doing anything about it?

    There will be discrimination and prejudices in a multi-racial, multi-religious society. From time to time, when they get extremes, they will have to be fixed. But going race-blind and religion-blind to fix them would be an overkill, like
    rebuilding a whole house to fix one weak structure.

    Who started all these nonsense about a post-racial, race-blind, One People, Singaporean Singapore? It can’t be the Chinese because they form the majority on the island. It can’t be the Malays because to them it would mean losing their
    religion and racially disown themselves from a solid majority in the surrounding region. It’s those cunning Indians who neither form the majority on the island nor the region. They feel inferior in terms of numbers. Therefore, they are keen to
    disregard race. That’s only when they are in Singapore though. In India, they would not disown their race but would enjoy all privileges that come with it. Eventhough India is a very racist country, they would definitely not espouse their idea of a
    post-racial, race-blind, India.

    Only damned fools will be fooled by these cunning Indians.

    There are some Chinese politicians in the Opposition WP who are such fools. In the Last GE, the party fielded a team with a majority of non-Chinese candidates. When the party won, its Chinese leaders claimed that Singaporeans are no more
    fixated with race. It shows how dumb they are. The people are still fixated with race but they are more fixated with having more Opposition voices in Parliament. Moreover, the PAP team was not helm by any heavyweight Minister. It was a 'suicide squad',
    as the WP itself claimed.
    Racial diversity and inclusiveness?

    We started off with Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others (CMIO). ‘Others’ include all other ethnicity beside the three main ones. This is already enough, more than enough, of racial diversity and inclusiveness, including the problems which
    come with it. The more racially diverse we become, the more social fault-lines there will be and the more fractious will the country become.

    There have been an obvious increase in the nation’s racial diversity. There was a change in migration policy around mid-1980s which caused an increase in migration of non-Chinese over the following decades. The reason given by the media was
    that it was to make up for the fall of population. But its the Chinese population which was falling due a drop in Chinese fertility rate. Where’s the logic? If it’s Chinese fertility rate that’s falling, more Chinese, not non-Chinese, migration
    should be welcomed.

    Today, on this island, there are so many people of so many different nationalities and ethnicity that people belonging to a particular nationality or ethnicity can be out on the street to stage a big protest on behalf of their nation or
    ethnicity.

    The racial minorities call for more racial diversity is a cunning ploy to dilute and diminish the Chinese majority in the population. Over the decades, Chinese proportion in Singapore’s population has dropped while those of the other three
    racial groups have risen.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Singapore#Ethnic_groups


    To each of the racial minority, more racial diversity means having more of their own race in the population. It’s been very effective. The demography of Singapore has gone through obvious changes, most obvious of which is the increasing
    number of non-Chinese in the population. The Indians have been most vocal on racial diversity, for cunning reasons. They are neither the majority on the island nor its surrounding region. Their call for racial diversity is made with having more of their
    own kind in mind. Not surprisingly, they are the biggest beneficiaries of racial diversity. There are now many more Indians in Singapore than at any time. So many that they make an Indian Singaporean, international author Pranag Khanna, believes that the
    future of Singapore and the world will be very, very brown.

    If it were to be the other way around, where the proportion of the racial minorities in the population drops while that of the Chinese rises, the minorities would cry out till them drop about “Racism!”.
    Mixed marriage?

    The racial minorities support and encourage mixed marriage of a Chinese female to a non-Chinese male resulting in a racial and gender bias in mixed marriages in Singapore – non-Chinese males marrying Chinese females.

    https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=singapore+mixed+marriage&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjjyfyntNH0AhVXi9gFHSNMBw8Q2-cCegQIABAA&oq=singapore+mixed+marriage&gs_lcp=
    CgNpbWcQAzoECAAQQzoFCAAQgARQjgpYuUVgl2VoAHAAeACAAZIBiAHTCJIBAzcuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy13aXotaW1nwAEB&sclient=img&ei=0y2vYaOUGdeW4t4Po5ideA&bih=524&biw=1120

    To the racial minority, this means one more for their race and one fewer for the Chinese. When an Indian male marries a Chinese female, the wife and off-springs will be Indianised. When a Malay male, who would also be a Muslim, marries a Chinese
    female, the wife would first have to be converted to Islam. Their off-springs would become Muslims.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=singapore+mixed+marriage

    Looking at the photos, there is also a skin color bias. Most of the pairings are dark-skinned males with fair-skinned females.

    In India, Muslim men are accused of enticing Hindu women into marriages in a ‘Love Jihad’. In Singapore, are Chinese women being enticed by non-Chinese men into marriages of ‘Love Racism’? Those non-Chinese men only doing it for their
    race?

    Of course there are mixed marriages which do not fit the general rules mentioned but they are the exceptions. They are the wrath of the racial minorities.
    Expand the ‘common space’ of Western culture and English Language?

    This is not about accepting or rejecting the English language. This language is currently the international lingua franca and it carries high economic values. It’s benefits to Singapore so far has been undeniable. It’s already a prevalent
    language in Singapore. How much more space should it deserve? Should it become the only language used publicly everywhere on the island?


    Racists among the racial minorities are not satisfied. They want to use English to destroy the Chinese language, and with it, Chinese culture. For that, they espouse the cunning ruse of ‘widening the common space’ of English. They want it to be
    the language used at home, in private gatherings and in all public places. Building names, company names, business signboards, even signboards for food sold, cooked or uncooked, must be in English only.


    They have sympathetic hears from the government. Singapore’s first PM, LKY, was born during the British colonial era. He grew up to become an English-and-England-educated Anglophile. When the racial minorities wanted to expand the ‘common space
    of English, he and his government was ready to help them along.
    The importance of English should not be over-emphasised. It’s growing space should not come at the expense of ethnic languages. This would be against multi-culturalism which is part of multi-racialism. Knowing a language is a skill. Being multi-
    lingual is better than being mono-lingual. For Singaporeans, how much importance to attach to which language should depend on the world outside. Singapore should look outwards to the world and adapt to its changes.


    In the 21st Century, a rising and rejuvenated China has seen a resurgence of Mandarin around the world. More and more people all over the world are learning and using Mandarin. Many countries have allocated space, in electronics as well as physical
    form, for Mandarin. To start with, it helps to attract Chinese tourists to these countries. In SG, Chinese tourists have topped the list of visitors for years now. Chinese investments around the world, especially in South-east Asia will increase. The
    space for Mandarin should be increased. Expanding the ‘common space’ for Mandarin along with that of English would be wiser.
    Moving Singapore away from China?

    Under the politics of minority racism, each racial minority would prefer that Singapore be close to the nations of its ancestry. Indians would like Singapore to be ruled from India. The Malays would prefer that Singapore become a State of the
    Malaysian Federation once again. None of them would want to see Singapore getting close to China.

    In the past, a Chinese Singaporean speaking up for China and Chinese culture would be labeled as chauvinist and Communist. That Cold War period is over. China is no more that poor and weak Communist nation which aimed to export Communism to the Third
    World. It is now the world’s top economy by PPP and second by other measures. This is another giant whose shoulder Singapore should stand on. But the politics of minority racism is standing in the way.

    When China was a poor and weak country, those racial minorities were glad that Chinese-majority Singapore kept a distance from China. This reduces China’s influence on Singapore and makes it easy for the locals to de-Sinicise Singapore. With a
    rising China, they have adopted a cunning racist reasoning, coupled with sarcasm, for Singapore to continue to keep itself away from China. It is this:

    “A Chinese majority Singapore will easily come under China’s influence.”
    “PRC Chinese will migrate to Singapore to overwhelm the other races.” “Singapore will become Chinapore.”
    “Non-Chinese will become second-class citizens in Singapore.”

    Ethnic Indian Ministers in government are more suspicious of Chinese Singaporeans. They believe that China would use Chinese in Singapore to influence and interfere in Singapore’s internal affairs. Those Chinese Singaporeans who support China and
    Chinese culture are accused of being and spies and agents for China. There are ethnic Indian Ministers who express their concerns even over the increasing hours of Mandarin lessons in schools.

    Not a single Indian, and never will there ever be one, who will express any concern about the increasing number of Indians in Singapore and how India will use them to serve its interest. On the contrary, they are pleased and excited by it all. In
    fact, one of them, an international author Parnag Khanna, is so excited by the increasing presence and influence of Indians in Singapore that it has led him to believe that “the future of the world will be very, very, brown”, like what he has seen in
    Singapore.

    The politics of minority racism should not be allowed to stand in the way of Singapore and China getting closer together.
    What will happen to Chinese-majority Singapore if the racial minorities have their way?

    If the politics of minority racism continues until it triumphs, Singapore will become a very different nation than it is now. It will be a Singapore in which the Chinese will not form a substantial proportion of the population, may be just another race
    among many races and all sorts of mixed races, where everyone is Westernised culturally and speaks only English. And all these will happen under the watch of a non-Chinese Prime Minister.

    Global politics is conducive to such happenings. The US is in competition and confrontation against China. It is wary of Chinese everywhere. A nation like Singapore with a Chinese-majority attracts the US’s special attention. It would want to change
    the national character of Singapore, making it less Chinese. India is a favorite of the US as a counterbalance against China. The US would want Singaporean Indians to have more power and influence locally. The Indians here will be more than delighted to
    collaborate and collude with the US. It fits their racist motto of “Rather a White- than a Yellow-man slave be”. The US would prefer an Indian PM for Singapore. Ex-President Trump has raised the issue of a non-Chinese PM with LHL who responded with a
    firm “No”. That won’t stop the US. It will continue to pile the pressure on Singapore’s Chinese leadership. With Singapore so dependent on the US, an Indian PM of Singapore may happen sooner than expected.


    Let’s watch how things develop. Slight incidents of racial disputes were prominently reported as racial discrimination against the racial minorities.
    Arising out of this, one security service company complained about the requirement to use Chinese-speaking guard in a condo. Even though that was practised with approval by the residents and the public authority for years, it was stopped. Now the whole
    security industry is to be rewarded.

    The security industry employs many Indians, from SG as well as Malaysia. Its fighting mainly for Indians’ interests.

    https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/community/2-in-5-security-officers-in-singapore-face-abuse-while-on-duty-almost-daily-occurrence-for-some-survey

    Security personnel are not only pitiful victims of abuses. They are perpetrators of crimes too.
    Examples, abusing their authority to frighten children into submission for body check, followed by molests,
    having affairs with maids,
    stealing from residences.


    Ironically, the security industry itself requires proper surveillance, scrutiny and screening. it's not that clean and innocent. It's fraught with racism, dishonest practices and frauds. Just to list a few:

    1. Racially unbalanced. It’s an Indian-dominated industry.
    The Indian guards would turn their guardrooms into their Indian homes, permeating with Indian perfumes.
    They would feed pigeons and birds , attracting more of these into the condo compound until these become a nuisance to the residents, dirtying window and air-con ledges with shit.

    2. Deploy fewer guards than contracted.
    Cheating is a norm of the industry. Say, a security service company sign a contract with a condo for N guards. Initially, it will deploy the number of guards as contracted. Once it gains the trust of the the condo management, it will deploy fewer number
    of guards. In this way, it can contract for more condos than it can fulfill the required number of guards; and make good profits in its operation. When discovered, it will promptly call in unqualified relief guards, including teenagers not in proper
    uniform, not giving a hoot to the security of the place it is supposed to secure.

    3. Sleeping on their jobs.
    Security guards in night shifts are often caught sleeping on their jobs.

    4. Irresponsibility.
    When a contract is not renewed, security service companies can react very irresponsibly. They would sabotage their clients. On the last night of duty, the guards will open up all the security barriers and disappear for the night, before the new
    contractor could arrive next day for proper takeover.



    While these problems exist, salary in the industry will be increased. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/security-guard-officer-pay-progressive-wage-model-pwm-2307846

    There are a lot of problems to solve in the security industry. Increasing the pay of security personnel should be the last resort. The authority should deal with the dishonesty and fraud in the security industry before it looks into the salary issue.
    In the long term, the future of the security industry lies in automation. Examples, automated identity checks, drones for patrolling.

    Wherever there are lots of Indians employed, like the construction industry and now the security’s, employees’ pay and welfare become the urgent issues. Indian controlled media will highlight the “plight”s of the employed, followed by the
    rationale for more pay. And the authority will be convinced. While more Indians get better paid, SG’s inflation soars and SG is becoming the most expensive place in the world to live in.

    The economy of a small nation like SG should not depend on cheap foreign labor. They may start off cheap but due to many factors, race being one, they become expensive rapidly. Abundant cheap labor disincentivise and demotivates industries to automate
    which is most needed for the advancement of economy of small nation like SG.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 28 23:53:54 2022
    [continued from previous message]

    Singaporeans should remain concerned about the CECA with India. This is not racism or xenophobia. It’s about getting the best talents for Singapore. But because its the Opposition which has raised it, it becomes an issue of adversarial
    politics. The government wins the debate yet again. This will mean another wave of “Indian talents” coming over, yet again.
    https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/83-of-singaporeans-believe-globalisation-is-good-for-the-economy-institute-of

    That’s a survey conducted a year ago about globalisation and immigration. It’s being used to muddle the issue of CECA with India. 2001 Singaporeans were polled. How representative is this of Singapore? What’s the racial representation
    of the people polled?

    The issue is about CECA with India allowing Indians to swagger in in large numbers. Now the results of a survey are being used indirectly to support CECA with India. As expected, the results of the survey led to its pre-determined conclusion:

    Only poor and lowly educated Singaporeans are against globalisation and immigration. They are doing it out of jealousy. It has nothing to do with race.


    That means Singapore should continue to let in Indians under CECA. And something has to be done to those poor and lowly educated in Singapore. A carrot-and-stick approach, perhaps. Stick - make them feel guilty as racists. Carrot – PR work.
    Have those Indian professionals spend their weekends delivering free goods to them.


    The survey results are being used in a report titled Making Identity Count In Singapore: Understanding Singaporeans' National Pride And Identity.

    Why should Singaporeans national pride be in doubt because of their objections to CECA with India? On the contrary, its because they love their country that they are against it. They see what the Agreement has done to their country, flooding
    it with Indians.

    Do something to CECA with India. That’s the problem, not the poor and lowly educated in Singapore.
    Watch these two video from CNA, titled Pride Over Prejudice.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKLANK0n1iU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5loOMUWPyE



    Going by the number of participants, one would think that the Chinese form a minority in SG. There’s this unshaven, fierce looking Indian. In another CNA serial, he was thumping his chest proclaiming “This land is mine”. When he says it,
    he means Singapore has become part of India. Watch out for him. He will have more appearances. Indians think they have found a hero in him.


    Let’s go through some points raised in the videos and delve into their details a bit.


    Non-Chinese being the victims of Chinese racism.
    Racism exist between all races. No one race is only the victim, no one race is only the perpetrator. Non-Chinese should know how racists they themselves are toward Chinese.
    Why no Chinese has been invited to speak of the racism they have experienced from the racial minorities? There are at least three serious cases with videos to support them.

    1. Malay man spat repeatedly at Chinese woman at a bus station. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfI_l2DpGsE
    2. Indian man spew profanities lasting minutes at Chinese at a food outlet.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E3z7mPVReQ
    3. Indian woman assaulted Chinese woman in a shop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyNOq9vUbd4

    Has anyone from the racial minorities been treated as badly by anyone from the Chinese majority? These were major racial incidents which should have created waves but they were played down, only briefly reported in the media. In contrast,
    Chinese who are accused of being racists over the slightest incidents are widely reported, exposed and criticised. They are harshly punished by the law, lose their jobs and livelihoods and become patients in IMH.


    PRC and Chinese
    “It is true that everywhere we go,we will see these PRCs. There are a few people around me who say that we are going to be a little China soon. This is what the Singaporean minority groups are afraid of and we will be treated like second-
    hands.”

    This is so anti-Chinese and anti-China. How can you “see” a PRC or Chinese? East Asians like Chinese, Koreans and Japs, South-East Asians like Vietnamese, they all look alike.
    Those who have grown up in Singapore since its independence will know the obvious change in the nation’s population - there are now many more non-Chinese, especially Indians.
    Those who are worried about there being more PRC or Chinese are just being racists. They would like to see more of their own kind instead.


    Throwing doubt at a PRC-converted Singaporean.
    One PRC-converted Singaporean was quoted as saying:
    “I think it would still be good to keep some boundaries. Somethings I choose to do my way. Singaporeans can do things their own way, but I hope they don’t try to convert me into a Singaporean in all ways.”

    For that she was accused of not being genuine and sincere enough to be a Singaporean, by that chest thumping thamby, who said:
    “That’s the biggest problem you see when it comes to immigration.
    When immigrants come in with this mindset because Singaporeans can feel it if you’re genuine and you’re sincere and you want to know about the people in the country.”

    If only that stupid Indian guy can think as he thumped his chest. There’s nothing wrong in what she said. It’s true for all Singaporeans, newly converted citizens or not. Singapore is a multi-racial and multi-religious nation. There are so
    many boundaries, barriers and taboos between the various races and religions. Must a newly-converted Singaporean carry the stink of an Indian, wash their arse with their hands like the Malays and eat only halal food like the Muslims before he/she can be
    considered a genuine and sincere Singaporean? Not even a born-and-bred Singaporean would be like that.

    What prompted the PRC-converted citizen to say what she said? She was answering a question. The question was not revealed. The same question should be posed to converted citizens of other countries/races for their answers. But it’s not.
    Cunning racism.


    Sports for unity and patriotism.
    How stupid. Those flag-waving and roaring in a football stadium do not constitute patriotism. They are all for fun and entertainment only. If these people were to ask to suffer and sacrifice for Singapore, they would scoot off without a trace.

    Even in the realm of sports, the anti-Chinese racism of the racial minorities is blatant. All those foreign footballers whom they adored as heroes were non-Chinese. They had contributed little to the international reputation of Singapore. They
    were only well-known locally. In Malaysia, there’s the term ‘Jaguh Kampong’, i.e., Kampong Champ. In Singapore, those footballers were only ‘Jaguh Bandar’ i.e., City Champ. Out of Singapore, they are nothing.

    PRC Chinese, those who are PR or have converted to Singaporeans, have won honors for Singapore in international arenas, all the way to the Olympics, in the games of badminton and table-tennis. Their contributions to Singapore are much more than
    those footballers. Yet their efforts and sacrifices were not recognised. Instead, they were criticised frequently by the racial minorities, with their loyalties to SG being questioned. They were demoralised and have mostly left. And so have Singapore’s
    achievements in international badminton and table-tennis. That’s what anti-Chinese racism has caused to Singapore in sports.



    Foreign workers.
    Mostly from South Asia and mostly Indians. Because of that, their welfare is the concern of Singaporean Indians. Food, clothing and accommodation, only the best of these for them will do. Local Indian lawyers will fight for their legal rights.
    They would be ensured of the highest compensation over the slightest injuries so much so that many of them began to feign injuries or purposely injure themselves.
    Now in the Straits Times, there is the concern about their recruitment through middlemen. Indian middlemen make a big cut for their recruitment fee for Indians to work in SG. Now the SG authority is expected to help cut this out so that it will
    be financially easier for Indians to come to work in SG.
    If these foreign workers were mostly Chinese, the treatment will be very different. The racial minorities will be barking and howling for their evictions and return to China. That’s how racist are the racial minorities of SG.


    English- and Singlish-speaking
    Racial minorities only complain about non-English-speaking PRC Chinese, e.g. bus conductors but not a word about those foreign workers who mostly don’t speak a word of English.
    Singlish is only for fun and entertainment. That’s why it is used in comedy. It should not be a part of a Singaporean Identity. It will make Singapore a nation of country bumpkins.


    Luke Lu.
    This guy appears in the video for a good reason. He’s a champion of the English language in SG. While he was doing his postgraduate studies in Cambridge, UK, he wrote articles to the ST proudly claiming English to be his mother-tongue. In
    response, one local guy suggested that he proclaimed it to his lecturers and fellow students in Cambridge and report back their reactions. That stopped the issue. We know what happened. He had been ridiculed as a well-colonised WOG or something along
    that line. That is the stark reality. We can use English for its economic value. The rest of the world can understand that. Claiming more than that will earn ridicules and even despises, from the rest of the world. This is especially true for a Chinese
    Singaporean. While overseas, Singaporean Chinese are recognised for their ethnicity rather than nationality. Through him/her, people are interested to know more about that 5000 years of Chinese civilisation, its culture and history.



    The two videos are examples of crooked, crafty and cunning anti-Chinese racism, pure and simple. What gives those racists the temerity to do it? How can those involved be allowed to get away with it? It’s a piss of Indian racism by Indian-
    dominated English-language media CNA, which is becoming Channel News Aneh. For a long time now, Singapore’s English language media has been dominated by the Indians. It’s the media of Indian racism.


    It’s time for the Indian-dominated English language media to stop all these nonsense. Those bastards and bitches among the racial minorities know better than anyone else that they themselves are as racist as any Chinese they accuse of racism
    against them.


    The nation is now facing devastation by a coronavirus. Though it originated from India and is carried over to SG by Indians, it infects and kills all Singaporeans, equally, "regardless of race, language or religion". Perhaps that's the way we
    will all become equal, i.e., dead.
    Shanmugam and his FICA.

    He has China and Chinese in his mind, his phobia about Chinese Singaporeans being used to spy for China. He referred to the case of Huang Jing. Up till today, ordinary Singaporeans don’t know what exactly has he done. Of bigger concern to
    Shanguman is China interfering in the affairs of Singapore to promote and defend the interest of the Chinese majority here. Some years back, there was the case of a Singapore diplomat objecting to the Chinese Ambassador’s action in KL, Malaysia. He
    interpreted the Ambassador’s friendly act as one interfering in Malaysia’s affairs.

    https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/amid-rise-identity-politics-sporeans-need-beware-foreign-manipulation-bilahari-kausikan


    Someone gave a robust reply to the above article, pointing out how much India cultivates the Indian diaspora to benefit India. That’s the racist attitude of the racial minorities. While they raise concern about the threat of China to Singapore,
    they themselves would wish for their ancestor nations to be powerful enough to come to their aid, when they need it.


    The truth is that it is much more likely for India to interfere in Singapore’s affair on behalf of the ethnic Indians. The following are the reasons.

    1. Leaders from nations in South-east Asia which have substantial proportion of ethnic Chinese in they population, Singapore included, have persuaded and pushed leaders in China to make statements on Overseas Chinese to the following effects.

    a. Overseas Chinese are citizens of their respective nations.
    b. They should be loyal to their nations.
    c. China would have no political links with Overseas Chinese. They would have to solve problems they face within their own nations by themselves.

    There has never been such commitment from India. Singapore has made no attempt to extract a single statement of a similar nature from past and present governments of India. This is a grave mistake in our foreign policy which should not be left
    uncorrected. It’s becoming more urgent as India grows stronger and more Indians choose to settle in Singapore.



    2. Every January, India celebrates Pravasi Bharatiya Divas which in English means Overseas India Day. Overseas India refers to anywhere in the world where there are ethnic Indians. India refers to them as People of Indian Origin (PIO). On this
    day, PIO’s all over the world are expected to refresh their remembrance of their ancestor land, promote India to the world and commit themselves to contribute to the progress of their Mother India.

    Indian Singaporeans do respond to the call. One case from Singapore.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html

    If that were to be a case about Singaporean Chinese and China, Indians like Shanmugam would go hysterical about China interfering in the affairs of Singapore.

    a. By proclaiming places where there are PIO’s as Overseas India, India is making territorial claim in nations around the world where there are Indians. This is naked expansionism.

    b. This is an outright interference by India of those nations which have ethnic Indians among their population, Singapore included.


    3. India’s ever increasing population.
    India has failed to control its population growth. Despite being only about a third the size of China in territory, India’s population is going to surpass that of China and will continue to grow after that, with no end in sight. It was
    correctly predicted that the seven-billionth human would be an Indian. So too would be the eight-, nine-billionth and more billions beyond these.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIZyHMUGdq0

    With Indians continuing to mate and breed like pests, resulting in a runaway population growth, India has no choice but to seek territorial expansion. Already, Sikkim, and more recently Kashmir, has fallen victims to Indian expansionism. Its
    remaining close neighbors are wary of India. Under current US geopolitical strategy, India is USs’ strategic partner. It is a member of the QUAD, a grouping of US, India, Japan and Australia, covering the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, so called
    Indo-Pacific, allowing India’s naval power to extend to the Pacific. With such geopolitical blessings, the temptations for India to expand grows stronger. Beyond South Asia, nations in South-east Asia would be easy target for India’s expansionism.
    The tiniest among them, Singapore, would be easiest target.


    India, rather than China, is the existential threat that Singapore faces. The Indian invasion of Singapore has been ongoing, albeit peacefully. Singapore is being flooded with Indians entering it through legal means, with the assistance of Indian
    lawyers. Right now it’s a peaceful invasion. Later on it will be full military invasion and colonisation.


    Indians like Shanmugam will be selectively blind to the Indian threat while skillfully espousing the Chinese threat, a typical Indian cunning act. Shanmugam’s FICA is just another of his Fucking Indian Cunning Act.
    Listen to this. Make a copy before it is taken out of circulation.

    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny


    Indian Singaporeans like to complain against the majority Chinese Singaporeans, accusing the Chinese of racism over any little issue. Worse is that they are suspicious of China interfering in the affairs of Singapore and readily accuse the Chinese
    of having loyalty to China and spying for China. To counter these, Ethnic Indian Minister of Home Affairs, Shanmugam, recently enacted and passed a Foreign Interference (Countermeasure) Act in Parliament.

    Now we have two Indian Singaporeans discussing how India and Indians will takeover the world.

    The gist of their conversation is this. India’s population growth is out of control and Indians are migrating massively to many parts of the world, causing the Indian Diaspora to grow incessantly.

    What does this mean for the world? No one can put it more succinctly than Dr. Parag Khanna himself. With much pride, he says:

    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”,

    referring to the average skin color of Indians.


    This is stark Indian Racism. It’s time for people around the world to wake up to this. They are facing a future threat of Indianisation. The future for the rest of the world is this – being flooded and overwhelmed by Indians.

    Singapore, being a tiny nation, will be the first to be affected by this Indian Global Racism. Already, its happening. Indians population in Singapore has been increasing for decades. Indians here use whatever means, positions or power they have to
    support and promote Indians migration to Singapore.

    A few examples.
    Singaporeans Chinese are not breeding enough, causing Chinese population to shrink. Solution? Bring in more Indians.
    Singaporeans shun menial labor works. Solution? Bring in more Indians. Singapore is short of talents. Solution? Bring in more Indians.


    Singapore government should have a good grasp on the subject of India, Indian migration and the Indian diaspora. It should now seriously review its CECA with India, making sure there is no loopholes which allow mass migration of Indians to
    Singapore.


    Let’s see how Shanmugam will use FICA now. These two Indian Singaporeans are discussing how India and Indians will take over the whole world, which includes Singapore, of course. If FICA is not used to deal with them, Shanmugam should shut up and
    shaft FICA up his arse.
    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny
    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”.

    That future is already here, in Singapore. The island nation is turning brown. It's almost pure brown in Changi Business Park.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html
    “To make it more personal, DBS is one of the only two banks that decided to subsidiarise in India four years ago and it's instructive that the only reason I believe we were is because I run DBS and I'm an Indian-based CEO and I'm comfortable doing
    so. Most of the foreign banks were unwilling to do that,” he said.

    That is obviously a case of India using a member of the PIO in the Indian Diaspora in Singapore to serve its interest and that Indian in Singapore using his position to work for the interest of India.

    What do Shanmugam with his FICA and those Indian racists who always complain about Singapore becoming another China and they becoming second class citizen have to say?
    Not again. Another Indian using CNA (Channel News Aneh) to portray Indians as victims of racial discrimination committed by the Chinese. This one is more cunning. He is doing it behind the facade of food.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Who+We+Are%2C+What+We+Eat+-+Part+1


    The fact is, in Singapore, you will find the most racist bastards and bitches among the Indians.

    We have an Indian in Singapore as CEO of Singapore’s largest bank who had confessed that it’s racial affinity which had driven him to invest the bank’s wealth in India.

    Another Indian in Singapore writes about the world turning brown, as the average skin color of Indians.

    Of all the Indians in the world, why would it take one from Singapore to be such Global Racists?

    Answer: When he looks at the increasing presence and influence of Indians in Singapore, in particular, that nearly-all-Indians Changi Business Park (CBP).

    Indian politicians, those in positions of influence in public institutions, those in the media industry and those spending a lot of time on social media, always portray Indians as pitiful victims of racial discrimination and condemning Chinese as
    racists. But they are all quiet on what these two Indians have done.

    While the local Indians keep crying bucketful of tears about discrimination, more Indians keep snaking and sneaking into Singapore, taking up jobs from laborers to professionals, until they can boast that their median income is the highest among all
    the races in SG.

    These racists have a scheme to bring in as many Indians to Singapore as possible while keeping the Chinese out.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrXxGUdY5jk

    It’s all about Indian praising Indian.

    Rajaratnam was just another Indian who was good with words, talking and writing, and doing nothing much else.

    LKY was the one who came up with the strategy of leaping over the Third World region to connect up with the developed world. He did not stop there. He went into actions. He went to the US to face the politicians and press and meet with corporate
    chieftains. He pleased the American politicians and press by speaking in strong support of US involvements in the Vietnam War. He did it so well that Rajaratnam had to remind him to swing back to more neutral ground. To American corporate chieftains, he
    sold them the merits of Singapore as a destination for investments. He did an excellent job of that too. Soon, American MNCs came in droves to open factories in Singapore, mopping up the unemployment and cushioning the impact of the British withdrawal.
    No credit is given to him. It’s only 2022, less than seven years after left this world.

    It’s easy to think and talk about turning Singapore into a Global City. It was the Cold War period. Singapore had to be selective. It can’t be linked up with cities in the Communist World. Even among those in the non-Communist world, it would be
    meaningless for it to link up with cities less developed than itself. The choices left are those in the democratic world with a prosperous economy; and preferably English-speaking too.

    You can choose but so can the other side. Cities that Singapore wishes to link up with may not reciprocate its friendly gesture. Those who want to link up with Singapore have their own interests in mind. It seems now Singapore has been the Chosen One by
    India. English-speaking and with an exploding population, India has looked upon Singapore as another suitable destination to unload its excessive breeding. Ethnic Indian Singaporeans are helping to ease the process by talking and writing profoundly
    about Global City, Openness, Diversity and Inclusiveness.

    Why is Janadas Devan not bearing his family name of Nair? Does he not want to be identified as the son of his father?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dosai prata@21:1/5 to dosai prata on Wed Mar 23 21:11:08 2022
    [continued from previous message]

    If they are Americans, Chinese or Japanese, that’s understandable. They would be from the top nations of the world, whose talents are lacking in Singapore. We need such people. But From India? What calibre of a nation is India? Are we
    really getting talents? Singapore is supposed to be a nation steep on meritocracy, which form one of its governing principles. Yet why is this not practised when it come to selecting foreign talents? Why is it receiving “ Indian talents” in large
    numbers who have little or no merits in the world?

    CECA with India should rightly be questioned. Other countries are cautious about it. Look at Australia. After many years of negotiation, Australia has yet to sign a CECA with India. The OZs are wary of the people-to-people exchange clause.
    Perhaps they have seen what had happened to Singapore. They do not want Australia to be flooded with Indians. And Australia is an island of continental size!

    Singaporeans should remain concerned about the CECA with India. This is not racism or xenophobia. It’s about getting the best talents for Singapore. But because its the Opposition which has raised it, it becomes an issue of adversarial
    politics. The government wins the debate yet again. This will mean another wave of “Indian talents” coming over, yet again.
    https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/83-of-singaporeans-believe-globalisation-is-good-for-the-economy-institute-of

    That’s a survey conducted a year ago about globalisation and immigration. It’s being used to muddle the issue of CECA with India. 2001 Singaporeans were polled. How representative is this of Singapore? What’s the racial representation
    of the people polled?

    The issue is about CECA with India allowing Indians to swagger in in large numbers. Now the results of a survey are being used indirectly to support CECA with India. As expected, the results of the survey led to its pre-determined
    conclusion:

    Only poor and lowly educated Singaporeans are against globalisation and immigration. They are doing it out of jealousy. It has nothing to do with race.


    That means Singapore should continue to let in Indians under CECA. And something has to be done to those poor and lowly educated in Singapore. A carrot-and-stick approach, perhaps. Stick - make them feel guilty as racists. Carrot – PR
    work. Have those Indian professionals spend their weekends delivering free goods to them.


    The survey results are being used in a report titled Making Identity Count In Singapore: Understanding Singaporeans' National Pride And Identity.

    Why should Singaporeans national pride be in doubt because of their objections to CECA with India? On the contrary, its because they love their country that they are against it. They see what the Agreement has done to their country,
    flooding it with Indians.

    Do something to CECA with India. That’s the problem, not the poor and lowly educated in Singapore.
    Watch these two video from CNA, titled Pride Over Prejudice.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKLANK0n1iU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5loOMUWPyE



    Going by the number of participants, one would think that the Chinese form a minority in SG. There’s this unshaven, fierce looking Indian. In another CNA serial, he was thumping his chest proclaiming “This land is mine”. When he says it,
    he means Singapore has become part of India. Watch out for him. He will have more appearances. Indians think they have found a hero in him.


    Let’s go through some points raised in the videos and delve into their details a bit.


    Non-Chinese being the victims of Chinese racism.
    Racism exist between all races. No one race is only the victim, no one race is only the perpetrator. Non-Chinese should know how racists they themselves are toward Chinese.
    Why no Chinese has been invited to speak of the racism they have experienced from the racial minorities? There are at least three serious cases with videos to support them.

    1. Malay man spat repeatedly at Chinese woman at a bus station. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfI_l2DpGsE
    2. Indian man spew profanities lasting minutes at Chinese at a food outlet.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E3z7mPVReQ
    3. Indian woman assaulted Chinese woman in a shop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyNOq9vUbd4

    Has anyone from the racial minorities been treated as badly by anyone from the Chinese majority? These were major racial incidents which should have created waves but they were played down, only briefly reported in the media. In contrast,
    Chinese who are accused of being racists over the slightest incidents are widely reported, exposed and criticised. They are harshly punished by the law, lose their jobs and livelihoods and become patients in IMH.


    PRC and Chinese
    “It is true that everywhere we go,we will see these PRCs. There are a few people around me who say that we are going to be a little China soon. This is what the Singaporean minority groups are afraid of and we will be treated like second-
    hands.”

    This is so anti-Chinese and anti-China. How can you “see” a PRC or Chinese? East Asians like Chinese, Koreans and Japs, South-East Asians like Vietnamese, they all look alike.
    Those who have grown up in Singapore since its independence will know the obvious change in the nation’s population - there are now many more non-Chinese, especially Indians.
    Those who are worried about there being more PRC or Chinese are just being racists. They would like to see more of their own kind instead.


    Throwing doubt at a PRC-converted Singaporean.
    One PRC-converted Singaporean was quoted as saying:
    “I think it would still be good to keep some boundaries. Somethings I choose to do my way. Singaporeans can do things their own way, but I hope they don’t try to convert me into a Singaporean in all ways.”

    For that she was accused of not being genuine and sincere enough to be a Singaporean, by that chest thumping thamby, who said:
    “That’s the biggest problem you see when it comes to immigration.
    When immigrants come in with this mindset because Singaporeans can feel it if you’re genuine and you’re sincere and you want to know about the people in the country.”

    If only that stupid Indian guy can think as he thumped his chest. There’s nothing wrong in what she said. It’s true for all Singaporeans, newly converted citizens or not. Singapore is a multi-racial and multi-religious nation. There are
    so many boundaries, barriers and taboos between the various races and religions. Must a newly-converted Singaporean carry the stink of an Indian, wash their arse with their hands like the Malays and eat only halal food like the Muslims before he/she can
    be considered a genuine and sincere Singaporean? Not even a born-and-bred Singaporean would be like that.

    What prompted the PRC-converted citizen to say what she said? She was answering a question. The question was not revealed. The same question should be posed to converted citizens of other countries/races for their answers. But it’s not.
    Cunning racism.


    Sports for unity and patriotism.
    How stupid. Those flag-waving and roaring in a football stadium do not constitute patriotism. They are all for fun and entertainment only. If these people were to ask to suffer and sacrifice for Singapore, they would scoot off without a trace.


    Even in the realm of sports, the anti-Chinese racism of the racial minorities is blatant. All those foreign footballers whom they adored as heroes were non-Chinese. They had contributed little to the international reputation of Singapore.
    They were only well-known locally. In Malaysia, there’s the term ‘Jaguh Kampong’, i.e., Kampong Champ. In Singapore, those footballers were only ‘Jaguh Bandar’ i.e., City Champ. Out of Singapore, they are nothing.

    PRC Chinese, those who are PR or have converted to Singaporeans, have won honors for Singapore in international arenas, all the way to the Olympics, in the games of badminton and table-tennis. Their contributions to Singapore are much more
    than those footballers. Yet their efforts and sacrifices were not recognised. Instead, they were criticised frequently by the racial minorities, with their loyalties to SG being questioned. They were demoralised and have mostly left. And so have
    Singapore’s achievements in international badminton and table-tennis. That’s what anti-Chinese racism has caused to Singapore in sports.



    Foreign workers.
    Mostly from South Asia and mostly Indians. Because of that, their welfare is the concern of Singaporean Indians. Food, clothing and accommodation, only the best of these for them will do. Local Indian lawyers will fight for their legal rights.
    They would be ensured of the highest compensation over the slightest injuries so much so that many of them began to feign injuries or purposely injure themselves.
    Now in the Straits Times, there is the concern about their recruitment through middlemen. Indian middlemen make a big cut for their recruitment fee for Indians to work in SG. Now the SG authority is expected to help cut this out so that it
    will be financially easier for Indians to come to work in SG.
    If these foreign workers were mostly Chinese, the treatment will be very different. The racial minorities will be barking and howling for their evictions and return to China. That’s how racist are the racial minorities of SG.


    English- and Singlish-speaking
    Racial minorities only complain about non-English-speaking PRC Chinese, e.g. bus conductors but not a word about those foreign workers who mostly don’t speak a word of English.
    Singlish is only for fun and entertainment. That’s why it is used in comedy. It should not be a part of a Singaporean Identity. It will make Singapore a nation of country bumpkins.


    Luke Lu.
    This guy appears in the video for a good reason. He’s a champion of the English language in SG. While he was doing his postgraduate studies in Cambridge, UK, he wrote articles to the ST proudly claiming English to be his mother-tongue. In
    response, one local guy suggested that he proclaimed it to his lecturers and fellow students in Cambridge and report back their reactions. That stopped the issue. We know what happened. He had been ridiculed as a well-colonised WOG or something along
    that line. That is the stark reality. We can use English for its economic value. The rest of the world can understand that. Claiming more than that will earn ridicules and even despises, from the rest of the world. This is especially true for a Chinese
    Singaporean. While overseas, Singaporean Chinese are recognised for their ethnicity rather than nationality. Through him/her, people are interested to know more about that 5000 years of Chinese civilisation, its culture and history.



    The two videos are examples of crooked, crafty and cunning anti-Chinese racism, pure and simple. What gives those racists the temerity to do it? How can those involved be allowed to get away with it? It’s a piss of Indian racism by Indian-
    dominated English-language media CNA, which is becoming Channel News Aneh. For a long time now, Singapore’s English language media has been dominated by the Indians. It’s the media of Indian racism.


    It’s time for the Indian-dominated English language media to stop all these nonsense. Those bastards and bitches among the racial minorities know better than anyone else that they themselves are as racist as any Chinese they accuse of
    racism against them.


    The nation is now facing devastation by a coronavirus. Though it originated from India and is carried over to SG by Indians, it infects and kills all Singaporeans, equally, "regardless of race, language or religion". Perhaps that's the way we
    will all become equal, i.e., dead.
    Shanmugam and his FICA.

    He has China and Chinese in his mind, his phobia about Chinese Singaporeans being used to spy for China. He referred to the case of Huang Jing. Up till today, ordinary Singaporeans don’t know what exactly has he done. Of bigger concern to
    Shanguman is China interfering in the affairs of Singapore to promote and defend the interest of the Chinese majority here. Some years back, there was the case of a Singapore diplomat objecting to the Chinese Ambassador’s action in KL, Malaysia. He
    interpreted the Ambassador’s friendly act as one interfering in Malaysia’s affairs.

    https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/amid-rise-identity-politics-sporeans-need-beware-foreign-manipulation-bilahari-kausikan


    Someone gave a robust reply to the above article, pointing out how much India cultivates the Indian diaspora to benefit India. That’s the racist attitude of the racial minorities. While they raise concern about the threat of China to
    Singapore,they themselves would wish for their ancestor nations to be powerful enough to come to their aid, when they need it.


    The truth is that it is much more likely for India to interfere in Singapore’s affair on behalf of the ethnic Indians. The following are the reasons.

    1. Leaders from nations in South-east Asia which have substantial proportion of ethnic Chinese in they population, Singapore included, have persuaded and pushed leaders in China to make statements on Overseas Chinese to the following effects.

    a. Overseas Chinese are citizens of their respective nations.
    b. They should be loyal to their nations.
    c. China would have no political links with Overseas Chinese. They would have to solve problems they face within their own nations by themselves.

    There has never been such commitment from India. Singapore has made no attempt to extract a single statement of a similar nature from past and present governments of India. This is a grave mistake in our foreign policy which should not be left
    uncorrected. It’s becoming more urgent as India grows stronger and more Indians choose to settle in Singapore.



    2. Every January, India celebrates Pravasi Bharatiya Divas which in English means Overseas India Day. Overseas India refers to anywhere in the world where there are ethnic Indians. India refers to them as People of Indian Origin (PIO). On this
    day, PIO’s all over the world are expected to refresh their remembrance of their ancestor land, promote India to the world and commit themselves to contribute to the progress of their Mother India.

    Indian Singaporeans do respond to the call. One case from Singapore.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html

    If that were to be a case about Singaporean Chinese and China, Indians like Shanmugam would go hysterical about China interfering in the affairs of Singapore.

    a. By proclaiming places where there are PIO’s as Overseas India, India is making territorial claim in nations around the world where there are Indians. This is naked expansionism.

    b. This is an outright interference by India of those nations which have ethnic Indians among their population, Singapore included.


    3. India’s ever increasing population.
    India has failed to control its population growth. Despite being only about a third the size of China in territory, India’s population is going to surpass that of China and will continue to grow after that, with no end in sight. It was
    correctly predicted that the seven-billionth human would be an Indian. So too would be the eight-, nine-billionth and more billions beyond these.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIZyHMUGdq0

    With Indians continuing to mate and breed like pests, resulting in a runaway population growth, India has no choice but to seek territorial expansion. Already, Sikkim, and more recently Kashmir, has fallen victims to Indian expansionism. Its
    remaining close neighbors are wary of India. Under current US geopolitical strategy, India is USs’ strategic partner. It is a member of the QUAD, a grouping of US, India, Japan and Australia, covering the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, so called
    Indo-Pacific, allowing India’s naval power to extend to the Pacific. With such geopolitical blessings, the temptations for India to expand grows stronger. Beyond South Asia, nations in South-east Asia would be easy target for India’s expansionism.
    The tiniest among them, Singapore, would be easiest target.


    India, rather than China, is the existential threat that Singapore faces. The Indian invasion of Singapore has been ongoing, albeit peacefully. Singapore is being flooded with Indians entering it through legal means, with the assistance of
    Indian lawyers. Right now it’s a peaceful invasion. Later on it will be full military invasion and colonisation.


    Indians like Shanmugam will be selectively blind to the Indian threat while skillfully espousing the Chinese threat, a typical Indian cunning act. Shanmugam’s FICA is just another of his Fucking Indian Cunning Act.
    Listen to this. Make a copy before it is taken out of circulation.

    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny


    Indian Singaporeans like to complain against the majority Chinese Singaporeans, accusing the Chinese of racism over any little issue. Worse is that they are suspicious of China interfering in the affairs of Singapore and readily accuse the
    Chinese of having loyalty to China and spying for China. To counter these, Ethnic Indian Minister of Home Affairs, Shanmugam, recently enacted and passed a Foreign Interference (Countermeasure) Act in Parliament.

    Now we have two Indian Singaporeans discussing how India and Indians will takeover the world.

    The gist of their conversation is this. India’s population growth is out of control and Indians are migrating massively to many parts of the world, causing the Indian Diaspora to grow incessantly.

    What does this mean for the world? No one can put it more succinctly than Dr. Parag Khanna himself. With much pride, he says:

    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”,

    referring to the average skin color of Indians.


    This is stark Indian Racism. It’s time for people around the world to wake up to this. They are facing a future threat of Indianisation. The future for the rest of the world is this – being flooded and overwhelmed by Indians.

    Singapore, being a tiny nation, will be the first to be affected by this Indian Global Racism. Already, its happening. Indians population in Singapore has been increasing for decades. Indians here use whatever means, positions or power they have
    to support and promote Indians migration to Singapore.

    A few examples.
    Singaporeans Chinese are not breeding enough, causing Chinese population to shrink. Solution? Bring in more Indians.
    Singaporeans shun menial labor works. Solution? Bring in more Indians. Singapore is short of talents. Solution? Bring in more Indians.


    Singapore government should have a good grasp on the subject of India, Indian migration and the Indian diaspora. It should now seriously review its CECA with India, making sure there is no loopholes which allow mass migration of Indians to
    Singapore.


    Let’s see how Shanmugam will use FICA now. These two Indian Singaporeans are discussing how India and Indians will take over the whole world, which includes Singapore, of course. If FICA is not used to deal with them, Shanmugam should shut up
    and shaft FICA up his arse.
    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/speaking-of-asia-podcast-will-immigrants-really-define-our-destiny
    “The future is brown. The future will be very, very brown”.

    That future is already here, in Singapore. The island nation is turning brown. It's almost pure brown in Changi Business Park.

    https://www.connectedtoindia.com/pbd-2021-target-diaspora-influencers-to-stimulate-capital-flow-for-aatmanirbhar-bharat-says-8782.html
    “To make it more personal, DBS is one of the only two banks that decided to subsidiarise in India four years ago and it's instructive that the only reason I believe we were is because I run DBS and I'm an Indian-based CEO and I'm comfortable
    doing so. Most of the foreign banks were unwilling to do that,” he said.

    That is obviously a case of India using a member of the PIO in the Indian Diaspora in Singapore to serve its interest and that Indian in Singapore using his position to work for the interest of India.

    What do Shanmugam with his FICA and those Indian racists who always complain about Singapore becoming another China and they becoming second class citizen have to say?
    Not again. Another Indian using CNA (Channel News Aneh) to portray Indians as victims of racial discrimination committed by the Chinese. This one is more cunning. He is doing it behind the facade of food.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Who+We+Are%2C+What+We+Eat+-+Part+1


    The fact is, in Singapore, you will find the most racist bastards and bitches among the Indians.

    We have an Indian in Singapore as CEO of Singapore’s largest bank who had confessed that it’s racial affinity which had driven him to invest the bank’s wealth in India.

    Another Indian in Singapore writes about the world turning brown, as the average skin color of Indians.

    Of all the Indians in the world, why would it take one from Singapore to be such Global Racists?

    Answer: When he looks at the increasing presence and influence of Indians in Singapore, in particular, that nearly-all-Indians Changi Business Park (CBP).

    Indian politicians, those in positions of influence in public institutions, those in the media industry and those spending a lot of time on social media, always portray Indians as pitiful victims of racial discrimination and condemning Chinese as
    racists. But they are all quiet on what these two Indians have done.

    While the local Indians keep crying bucketful of tears about discrimination, more Indians keep snaking and sneaking into Singapore, taking up jobs from laborers to professionals, until they can boast that their median income is the highest among all
    the races in SG.

    These racists have a scheme to bring in as many Indians to Singapore as possible while keeping the Chinese out.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrXxGUdY5jk

    It’s all about Indian praising Indian.

    Rajaratnam was just another Indian who was good with words, talking and writing, and doing nothing much else.

    LKY was the one who came up with the strategy of leaping over the Third World region to connect up with the developed world. He did not stop there. He went into actions. He went to the US to face the politicians and press and meet with corporate
    chieftains. He pleased the American politicians and press by speaking in strong support of US involvements in the Vietnam War. He did it so well that Rajaratnam had to remind him to swing back to more neutral ground. To American corporate chieftains, he
    sold them the merits of Singapore as a destination for investments. He did an excellent job of that too. Soon, American MNCs came in droves to open factories in Singapore, mopping up the unemployment and cushioning the impact of the British withdrawal.
    No credit is given to him. It’s only 2022, less than seven years after left this world.

    It’s easy to think and talk about turning Singapore into a Global City. It was the Cold War period. Singapore had to be selective. It can’t be linked up with cities in the Communist World. Even among those in the non-Communist world, it would be
    meaningless for it to link up with cities less developed than itself. The choices left are those in the democratic world with a prosperous economy; and preferably English-speaking too.

    You can choose but so can the other side. Cities that Singapore wishes to link up with may not reciprocate its friendly gesture. Those who want to link up with Singapore have their own interests in mind. It seems now Singapore has been the Chosen One
    by India. English-speaking and with an exploding population, India has looked upon Singapore as another suitable destination to unload its excessive breeding. Ethnic Indian Singaporeans are helping to ease the process by talking and writing profoundly
    about Global City, Openness, Diversity and Inclusiveness.

    Why is Janadas Devan not bearing his family name of Nair? Does he not want to be identified as the son of his father?

    China calling? Oh no!

    https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/politics/st-closeup-the-rise-of-pro-china-singaporeans-and-what-it-means-for-singapore

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4Ml_JVc98A

    Summary of the article and video:
    China on the rise. More and more Chinese Singaporeans are becoming pro-China. Chinese fathers and grandfathers are being "self-radicalised" by Chinese propaganda. This is reducing their patriotism towards Singapore. Ethnicity is overriding nationality.
    This is a threat to Singapore. It must be stopped.


    This is racism. Why is it that the concern is only about Chinese Singaporean affinity with China? What about Indians with India? Malay/Muslims with Indonesia and Malaysia and the Muslim World?

    The rise of China is acknowledged and admired not just by Chinese but people all over the world, including Westerners. Just a few examples. They are non-Chinese. They are not about ethnic affinity or Chinese propaganda.

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22cyrus+jannsen%22+china

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22daniel+dumbrill%22+china

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22brian+berletic%22+china

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22jerry+grey%22+china

    This Professor and Historian is critical of both the US and China. But he believes the US is in decline and will be replaced by China, ushering in a new World Order.
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=alfred+maccoy%22+china

    More views about China from foreigners living in China. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22living+in+china%22

    You won’t learn about the above through the Singapore media. It only reflects the Main Stream Media of the West.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)