"As is known to all, the US has long held "strategic ambiguity" when it comes to the Taiwan question - not to make statements over whether to "defend" Taiwan island if the People's Liberation Army (PLA) makes military moves to reach reunificationacross the Straits. If Biden's answer implies that the US is giving up strategic ambiguity, and that US troops will fight the PLA if a war breaks out in the Straits, that would be a major shift in the cross-Straits situation and will be bound to trigger
...secessionists until a desperate fight erupts, and make the Americans bear the risk of a bottomless war for Taiwan island. So, even if he dared make a slip of the tongue, he would dare not really think so from the bottom of his heart. "
Biden's words are not backed by basic US policy or laws. Even the Taiwan Relations Act and Six Assurances do not include content on US commitment to send troops to defend the island.
...
Biden does not have the political authority to announce that the US military will "defend Taiwan" when a war breaks out, nor does he have the confidence to have a strategic collision with the Chinese mainland in the Taiwan Straits to support Taiwan
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202110/1237049.shtml?id=12
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 9:15:32 AM UTC-10, ltlee1 wrote:across the Straits. If Biden's answer implies that the US is giving up strategic ambiguity, and that US troops will fight the PLA if a war breaks out in the Straits, that would be a major shift in the cross-Straits situation and will be bound to trigger
"As is known to all, the US has long held "strategic ambiguity" when it comes to the Taiwan question - not to make statements over whether to "defend" Taiwan island if the People's Liberation Army (PLA) makes military moves to reach reunification
secessionists until a desperate fight erupts, and make the Americans bear the risk of a bottomless war for Taiwan island. So, even if he dared make a slip of the tongue, he would dare not really think so from the bottom of his heart. "...
Biden's words are not backed by basic US policy or laws. Even the Taiwan Relations Act and Six Assurances do not include content on US commitment to send troops to defend the island.
...
Biden does not have the political authority to announce that the US military will "defend Taiwan" when a war breaks out, nor does he have the confidence to have a strategic collision with the Chinese mainland in the Taiwan Straits to support Taiwan
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202110/1237049.shtml?id=12Do not underestimate democacies when they have to go to war. Hitler made that mistake. Democracies fight for God and country which makes them one.
On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 9:15:32 AM UTC-10, ltlee1 wrote:across the Straits. If Biden's answer implies that the US is giving up strategic ambiguity, and that US troops will fight the PLA if a war breaks out in the Straits, that would be a major shift in the cross-Straits situation and will be bound to trigger
"As is known to all, the US has long held "strategic ambiguity" when it comes to the Taiwan question - not to make statements over whether to "defend" Taiwan island if the People's Liberation Army (PLA) makes military moves to reach reunification
secessionists until a desperate fight erupts, and make the Americans bear the risk of a bottomless war for Taiwan island. So, even if he dared make a slip of the tongue, he would dare not really think so from the bottom of his heart. "...
Biden's words are not backed by basic US policy or laws. Even the Taiwan Relations Act and Six Assurances do not include content on US commitment to send troops to defend the island.
...
Biden does not have the political authority to announce that the US military will "defend Taiwan" when a war breaks out, nor does he have the confidence to have a strategic collision with the Chinese mainland in the Taiwan Straits to support Taiwan
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202110/1237049.shtml?id=12Do not underestimate democacies when they have to go to war. Hitler made that mistake. Democracies fight for God and country which makes them one.
"As is known to all, the US has long held "strategic ambiguity" when it comes to the Taiwan question - not to make statements over whether to "defend" Taiwan island if the People's Liberation Army (PLA) makes military moves to reach reunificationacross the Straits. If Biden's answer implies that the US is giving up strategic ambiguity, and that US troops will fight the PLA if a war breaks out in the Straits, that would be a major shift in the cross-Straits situation and will be bound to trigger
...secessionists until a desperate fight erupts, and make the Americans bear the risk of a bottomless war for Taiwan island. So, even if he dared make a slip of the tongue, he would dare not really think so from the bottom of his heart. "
Biden's words are not backed by basic US policy or laws. Even the Taiwan Relations Act and Six Assurances do not include content on US commitment to send troops to defend the island.
...
Biden does not have the political authority to announce that the US military will "defend Taiwan" when a war breaks out, nor does he have the confidence to have a strategic collision with the Chinese mainland in the Taiwan Straits to support Taiwan
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202110/1237049.shtml?id=12
"As is known to all, the US has long held "strategic ambiguity" when it
comes to the Taiwan question - not to make statements over whether to "defend" Taiwan island if the People's Liberation Army (PLA) makes
military moves to reach reunification across the Straits. If Biden's
answer implies that the US is giving up strategic ambiguity, and that US troops will fight the PLA if a war breaks out in the Straits, that would
be a major shift in the cross-Straits situation and will be bound to
trigger fierce confrontation.
...
Biden's words are not backed by basic US policy or laws. Even the Taiwan Relations Act and Six Assurances do not include content on US commitment
to send troops to defend the island.
...
Biden does not have the political authority to announce that the US
military will "defend Taiwan" when a war breaks out, nor does he have the confidence to have a strategic collision with the Chinese mainland in the Taiwan Straits to support Taiwan secessionists until a desperate fight erupts, and make the Americans bear the risk of a bottomless war for
Taiwan island. So, even if he dared make a slip of the tongue, he would
dare not really think so from the bottom of his heart. "
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202110/1237049.shtml?id=12
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 88:11:53 |
Calls: | 6,496 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 12,100 |
Messages: | 5,277,325 |