The "rule-based world order" mantra implicitly implies
a ruler. It may be God, or a God's representative here.
It's essentially a "rightist" tune.
It is at odds with the idea of con-sensus, where "con"
implies a collective sensus / sense, which is within the
"leftist" field.
Given the mantra is being mainly promoted in the recent
years by the bodies associated with the Atlanticist
"liberal democracy", which is seen leftist domestically,
it exposes the Yin-Yang transformation of the agenda
when it switches to international context.
The meaning behind the "rule-based order" mantra was
never defined coherently, so the fact that it's pedaled
intensely by those bodies is a kind of psycholinguistic
manipulation aimed to touch fuzzy connotational impacts
in the mass (un)conscious.
"obey the ruler"
The "rule-based world order" mantra implicitly implies
a ruler. It may be God, or a God's representative here.
It's essentially a "rightist" tune.
It is at odds with the idea of con-sensus, where "con"
implies a collective sensus / sense, which is within the
"leftist" field.
Given the mantra is being mainly promoted in the recent
years by the bodies associated with the Atlanticist
"liberal democracy", which is seen leftist domestically,
it exposes the Yin-Yang transformation of the agenda
when it switches to international context.
The meaning behind the "rule-based order" mantra was
never defined coherently, so the fact that it's pedaled
intensely by those bodies is a kind of psycholinguistic
manipulation aimed to touch fuzzy connotational impacts
in the mass (un)conscious.
"obey the ruler"
Read also <https://tinyurl.com/yo9abhrv>
I'd say once more, since there's no accurate definition,
it rather makes sense to talk about connotational flavor
and practice of rhetorical application.
Oleg Smirnov <os333@netc.eu> wrote:
The "rule-based world order" mantra implicitly implies
a ruler. It may be God, or a God's representative here.
It's essentially a "rightist" tune.
It is at odds with the idea of con-sensus, where "con"
implies a collective sensus / sense, which is within the
"leftist" field.
Given the mantra is being mainly promoted in the recent
years by the bodies associated with the Atlanticist
"liberal democracy", which is seen leftist domestically,
it exposes the Yin-Yang transformation of the agenda
when it switches to international context.
The meaning behind the "rule-based order" mantra was
never defined coherently, so the fact that it's pedaled
intensely by those bodies is a kind of psycholinguistic
manipulation aimed to touch fuzzy connotational impacts
in the mass (un)conscious.
"obey the ruler"
Read also <https://tinyurl.com/yo9abhrv>
I'd say once more, since there's no accurate definition,
it rather makes sense to talk about connotational flavor
and practice of rhetorical application.
Бля, пиздец какой у нас дебильчик-то умный.
On 11/21/2023 11:25 PM, Dmitry Krivitsky wrote:
On 11/21/2023 11:15 PM, Const wrote:
Oleg Smirnov <os333@netc.eu> wrote:
Бля, пиздец какой у нас дебильчик-то умный.
А я вот думаю - его, наверное, пожалеть надо. Сизифов труд, всё-таки.
"ебал и плакал" (ц)
On 11/21/2023 11:15 PM, Const wrote:
Oleg Smirnov <os333@netc.eu> wrote:
The "rule-based world order" mantra implicitly implies
a ruler. It may be God, or a God's representative here.
It's essentially a "rightist" tune.
It is at odds with the idea of con-sensus, where "con"
implies a collective sensus / sense, which is within the
"leftist" field.
Given the mantra is being mainly promoted in the recent
years by the bodies associated with the Atlanticist
"liberal democracy", which is seen leftist domestically,
it exposes the Yin-Yang transformation of the agenda
when it switches to international context.
The meaning behind the "rule-based order" mantra was
never defined coherently, so the fact that it's pedaled
intensely by those bodies is a kind of psycholinguistic
manipulation aimed to touch fuzzy connotational impacts
in the mass (un)conscious.
"obey the ruler"
Read also <https://tinyurl.com/yo9abhrv>
I'd say once more, since there's no accurate definition,
it rather makes sense to talk about connotational flavor
and practice of rhetorical application.
Бля, пиздец какой у нас дебильчик-то умный.
А я вот думаю - его, наверное, пожалеть надо. Сизифов труд, всё-таки.
On 11/21/2023 11:15 PM, Const wrote:
Oleg Smirnov <os333@netc.eu> wrote:
The "rule-based world order" mantra implicitly implies
a ruler. It may be God, or a God's representative here.
It's essentially a "rightist" tune.
It is at odds with the idea of con-sensus, where "con"
implies a collective sensus / sense, which is within the
"leftist" field.
Given the mantra is being mainly promoted in the recent
years by the bodies associated with the Atlanticist
"liberal democracy", which is seen leftist domestically,
it exposes the Yin-Yang transformation of the agenda
when it switches to international context.
The meaning behind the "rule-based order" mantra was
never defined coherently, so the fact that it's pedaled
intensely by those bodies is a kind of psycholinguistic
manipulation aimed to touch fuzzy connotational impacts
in the mass (un)conscious.
"obey the ruler"
Read also <https://tinyurl.com/yo9abhrv>
I'd say once more, since there's no accurate definition,
it rather makes sense to talk about connotational flavor
and practice of rhetorical application.
, - .
- , , . , ӣ-.
,
.
.
.
3.
.
- - .
, , .
, , .
.
.
, , ,
, .
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 110:18:08 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,826 |