Hello,
More of my philosophy about assimilation and about integration and about communism and marxism and about the Mediterranean lifestyle and about the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
So i think i am a new philosopher and i have just looked at the following french video where Eric Zemmour is speaking about assimilation to the
french identity:
Eric Zemmour dérape face à Rokhaya Diallo chez Thierry Ardisson | INA Arditube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8ue6g6nEHQ
So i think that Eric Zemmour in the above video is not so smart, and
the black african women is not so smart, since i am discovering
patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above video, so the in
philosophy we have to ask a philosophical question of:
Why the assimilation to the french identity has not worked in France ?
So i will for example speak about maghrebians or maghrebis in France,
so you have to understand that most of maghrebis or maghrebians
in France are not 100% muslims, since i think that maghrebians in
France want to keep there islamic "values" since they have not
enough trust towards atheism, since from the stories of muslims
in the islamic tradition, they know the atheistic system where prophet Muhammad was living was so problematic, so you can say that prophet Muahmmad is this or that, but i mean that maghrebians don't trust
enough atheistic systems for the reasons that i am giving, and it is why
they want to keep the islamic "values" , but the islamic "values" that
they want to keep are not the islamic laws like doing the prayer or..
i mean that they want to keep the islamic "values" like being humble and being civilized in a society like not being the too much sexualization and too much violence and being civilized, other than that maghrebians in France have also traditions and way
of life that have advantages, so we have to look carefully , and not being stupid , to what are those advantages that they want to keep , and i think from what i am explaining, it is why maghrebians want
also not to be assimilated in France.
I think i am a new philosopher, and you can read my new ideas of my philosophy in the below web link, and i have also just talked about absurdism of the french philosopher Albert Camus, read it in my below thoughts, and now i will talk about communism
and marxism, so i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process of competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can have a “
synthesis” of private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that marxism and
communism say that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but i think that this way of thinking of communism and marxism is too extremist in our today
world , and of course i have not talked about the how to give a decent minimum wage, but you have to understand that you have to know how to be efficient at that, but i invite you to look at my following thoughts of my philosophy about how to make an
effective tax on robots and how and why to make the reforms of progressive capitalism and about the two different ways of how to grow economy and about productivity and about automation and about capitalism etc., so i invite you to read my following
thoughts about them in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/KN4V-rGRDdU
And i say that antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism is related to Class Struggle, and here are my
thoughts about it:
Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize too much in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.
And I have just looked at the following video about absurdism of the french philosopher Albert Camus, and i invite you to look at it:
L'absurde de Camus - La philosophie d'Albert Camus 1ère partie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N00s97y8818
So I think i am a new philosopher and have just discovered an important
pattern in the philosophy of Albert Camus, so Albert Camus is saying
that human life has no meaning, so it is absurd, and he says that absurdism comes from the fact that humans are waiting for the meaning of human life, but life has no meaning and i think there is a weakness in the reasoning of the french philosopher
Albert Camus, and it is that we humans are not constantly waiting for "the" meaning of human life, since humans have the capacity of forgetting, so humans are "most" of the time doing things in there lives that give "a" meaning to there lives and that
makes them forget that life has no meaning , and humans have also the capacity of forgetting that makes them not think about the how human life has no meaning, so it is why we can not say that human life has no meaning as has said it the french
philosopher Albert Camus, so it is why i say that Albert Camus is not right, and notice that this capacity of forgetting of humans is by logical analogy like the capacity of imagination of humans that solves problems, and here is my new proverb about it
and read it carefully:
"The sky and its beautiful stars on a beautiful night allow us to dream and they give us hope, and I think it's like the human imagination that is not a down-to-earth and it allows us to dream and it gives us hope."
"Le ciel et ses belles étoiles d'une belle nuit nous permettent de rêver et de nous donner de l'espoir, et je pense que c'est comme l'imaginaire humain, qui n'est pas du terre à terre, qui nous permet de rêver et de donner de l'espoir."
I invite you to read the following new interesting article from ScienceDaily:
Adherence to a Mediterranean lifestyle associated with lower risk of all-cause and cancer mortality
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/08/230816170623.htm
And you can read my thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
And i invite you to read the new ideas of my philosophy in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/83YXmWNyTiA
And you can read my new proverb in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/pNuWyeWC6QE
And you can read my poems of Love and poems in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JDrPkZz_tWk
And i also invite you to read my interesting new thoughts in the following web link about the new and future technologies:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/lfnlD52jDzI
And you can read my thoughts in the following web link about cancer and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/3HwdSeO3esc
And read more of my following thoughts about cancer and about health and about new interesting medical treatments and drugs etc.:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/bayBuSxhTEU
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)