Here is my final extended post of today (2/2)
From
computer45@21:1/5 to
All on Tue Jan 30 14:05:45 2018
[continued from previous message]
This is the magical word, it is optimization.
Why do we optimize ? to be more powerful and more reliability and
correctness.
You will ask a question such as:
Is optimization: reliability and correctness ?
My answer:
When you are not reliable and/or correctness you are less
efficient, so efficiency is also reliability and correctness.
This is why i have abstracted the essence of organization to the process
of optimization.
But that's lacking Abstraction.
Because we have to look at the composition of optimization.
Optimization is performance and reliability.
So that the essence of organization is the composition of optimization
that is performance and reliability.
So the essence of optimization is not only performance , but it is
reliability.
And that's also efficient morality, and efficient morality is Liberty
and Liberty is efficient morality.
So now my answer is not finished:
Because the optimization is constrained..
Because corruption of morality is related to optimization..
So how can we measure corruption of morality ?
What is corruption of morality ?
This is an interesting subject..
It's like abstracting, you have to decompose and compose..
You can say for example what are the causes of corruption of morality?
You can say what is the consequences of corruption ?
You can define efficiently morality to be able to know about corruption.
So if you define morality you will define it as a composition of:
Guidance of moral, and a priori pure moral and empirical moral.
And now you see that the difficulty is how to set the reference to be
able to measure corruption of morality with it.
What is the reference of morality ?
The reference must be optimization that knows how to be optimization.
I mean that optimization can not set itself as being performance alone.
And optimization can not set itself to be extreme justice that lacks optimization, like ignoring the optimization by the "heuristic" of
"tolerance" that optimizes the economic system and the social system.
And optimization must be an effort to maintain stableness and
reliability of the system, that means reliability of the system, this is related to security, and security is also related to compassion and love
and respect, because neglecting compassion , love and respect do cause extremism and violence that hurt the system.
How optimization must be this effort ? because discipline and progress
are inherent to Liberty, so you have to enforce them efficiently and
wisely by the hard way, that means by laws and by the soft way
that i talked about..
So all in all the schema seems to be more clear and seems to indicate
to us more what is corruption of morality, and it indicate to us
what is the essence of organization..
Getting more rational...
Today i will ask a question of: what is love ?
And the answer must be more rational.
So we have to use smartness..
Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening..
If you say that there is still some suffering in your life..
You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love.
But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more
than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to
be part of good, and this good is part of love.
So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the system..
But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference
is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering
is not love.
But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say
that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part
of love.
So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of
morality of the society is a good measure i think.
It is like when we are asking the questions of:
What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ?
I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality.
How it can measure it?
Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our
universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you
have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or
universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to
the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that
knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality
by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and
reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level
or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if
the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that
it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness.
How can we measure the level and degree of quality ?
It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is
a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is
more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more
reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that
measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way.
I give you an example..
If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more
performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but
they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this
corruption of morality.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)