Hello.....


Here is my final extended post of today, please read it all

Yet more precision and more calculations , please follow with me:

The essence of Class Struggle

An idiot will say that Class Struggle such as of communism
is not correct !

But philosophy is not the same , in philosophy you have
to be more rigorous like in mathemathics !

I will get on more philosophy..

I think the nature of Class Struggle of communism
has changed a little bit in the West, i mean Class Struggle
of communism has soften, but it is still Class Struggle !
i mean that "Democracy" and "usefulness" or to make
yourself a "utility" or to make yourself "useful" are also Class
Struggle ! and consumerism do bring the counter-power of consumer
confidence index that we have to higher internationally and locally, so
this counter power of consumer confidence index is like Class Struggle
also, this is what i have said bellow that the essence of compassion is
the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness. And this is
why i have spoken about the essence of Israel in a such
way, because making yourself "useful" is also a wise egoism
that lesser egoism of nationalism and egoism. Here is what i have said:

About the essence of Israel...

You have seen me in my political philosophy introducing to you what i
called guidance of moral as embellishment of humanity, and i have
defined it as being like: happiness and tolerance that are parts of the
set of our essence ! because we are capable of knowing them and feeling
them and measuring with them.

So now there is an important question related to the essence of Israel..

Do we have to judge Israel by this guidance of moral, by saying
for example that Israel is not tolerance and is not happiness
of guidance of moral ?

This is not the right way to measure, you have to be wisdom that knows
how to measure ! so efficient morality that is performance and
reliability must be used as a soft way also that constrain the
spirit of Israel, so Israel must know that efficient morality
must be capable of "balancing" well or "tuning" well if you want, i give
you an example: today we are trying to be efficient morality
that is taking into account not just our today but also taking
into account the future of our planet earth that we have not to hurt
with excessive pollution and exploitation ! this is the kind of spirit
that lacks Israel ! because nationalism must be constrained by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness, so perfection is
that Israel has to know how to think the after and the after after with
arabs, so we have to be frank between us, i think like was saying it
Fordism, consumerism or economy between Israel and arab countries is the
right solution that will bring peace and prosperity, and arabs has to
know it and be capable of being useful to Israel and Israel has to be
capable of being useful to arabs , the interdependence of the two
economies of Israel and arabs will create good relations between arab
countries and Israel.


And i have said also that:

Is Donald Trump nationalism ?

We have to be smart, what do i think about Donald Trump ?
is Donald Trump nationalism ? i think it is a really good
question of philosophy ! so what do thinks philosophy about
it ? i think that we have to look at it from the perspective of
my philosophy that is in accordance with efficient morality,
because philosophy also must adhere to efficient morality to
be able to be called a high standard of philosophy, this
is why i think from my writing of before, that Donald Trump
do adhere to my rule that is: survival is usefulness ! and
as you have noticed that we are more lucky with empirical moral
inferred from experience, because the tools of today are
much more enhanced to bring more dignity to the table,
so if i just say that: survival is usefulness and usefulness
is egoism and survival is egoism.. so if you are less smart you will
think that it is not acceptable, but a smart person will say
that it adheres to the standard of efficient morality that is
as i have defined it: performance and reliability, this is
why we have to be more confident with it, and not be blind and
notice that when i say: survival is usefulness, it is said
in a "context" of today, so it brings many contraints that
provoke quality and bring more quality, usefulness do
cause the rise of different actors as powers and counter-powers,
but don't be stupid to see it as an evil war, because
the tools of today are much more advanced and enhanced, so we have to
be more optimistic about it, because survival is usefulness
and usefulness is egoism and egoism has brought consumer confidence
index that we have to higher internationally and locally, this egoism
is the solution to egoism and nationalism, because consumerism
and consumer confidence index has completely constrained
natonalism and egoism in such a manner that it has lesser
egoism and make the actors of economy to share more with third world
countries and other countries , also usefulness of competitiveness
between different actors of economy has played the same role of egoism
that is the solution to egoism and nationalism, because also
competitiveness and consumerism has completely constrained nationalism
and egoism in such a manner that it has lesser egoism and make the
actors of economy to share more with third world countries and other
countries, and you will notice it from how Donald Trump is talking about economy by saying the following:

US President Donald Trump on Friday said that "America first does not
mean America alone," even as he maintained his country would remain his
top priority. He reminded the audience that "American prosperity created countless jobs in world."
"As President of the United States, I will always put America first...
America first does not mean America alone. When the United States grows,
so does the world,"

Read more here to notice it:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/america-first-does-not-mean-america-alone-us-president-donald-trump-at-wef/articleshow/62664653.cms

So as you have noticed "usefulness" as concept of my rule:
survival is usefulness, is a broader concept that models better
than simply saying like Fordism that consumerism brings prosperity
and peace, because usefulness is a much brother concept that models
better and brings prosperity and peace etc.

The essence of compassion..

We have to do more philosophy to know about it..

What about compassion ?

What is the essence of compassion ?

You have to deeply think philosophy to understand it,
the essence of compassion is the essence of humanity
that is perfection and strongness, the essence of
compassion comes the fact that i said before that:

==
"because a society is constrained by general morality such as laws
that states that what is bad is "relative" to our
level of sophistication by performance and reliability or if you want
that it is relative to the level of quality that we have attained, this
is why i have said, that corruption of morality is measured by
the level of "quality" that we have attained or if you want by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness"

Is there any contradiction or is there a "bug" ?

No, in the above i have said that: "because a society is constrained by
general morality such as laws that states that what is bad is
"relative" to our level of sophistication by performance and reliability"

So i am stating that it is the level of quality that we have attained
by performance and reliability, so morality is constrained by
reliability, so you can not simply say that corruption of morality is
measured by the level of "quality", this will introduce a "bug" that
can bring violence to the system, so measuring of corruption of
morality is measured by and relative to performance and reliability, so
hope you have understood this distinction. And morality is then safe !
==


So the essence of compassion is a balance of powers ! it's
like a balance of powers and counter-powers, this is the essence
of our humanity, perfection and strongness has given rise
to powers and couner-powers that bring more quality to the table !
so without being extermist, i will say that this has the same
effect of "Class Struggle" in communism, because this
brings embellishment and this brings justice and this bring quality,
because look at what i was saying about handicaped people:

If we ask a question of: is handicaped people useful ?

Compassion of government (in form of help) is applied on handicaped
people because i think this is "useful" as a way to embellish our world,
also it is "useful" because the government risks to be punished by
people if he doesn't help handicaped people, and also we risk violence
inside the system if government doesn't help handicaped people.

So as you have noticed that governement is "constrained" by
counter-powers to be able to help handicaped people.

And the essence of compassion is the same as the essence of Democracy,
because as you have noticed i said before that:

About dictatorship and communism and the dictatorship

The problem with those is the problem of the past, because there is
a necessity to provoke and bring quality with the introduction of new mechanisms, like the mechanisms of the counter-power of consumerism and consumer confidence index, and like the mechanism of the power of
democracy, and like the mechanism of the counter-power of the financial
and bank institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this
creates more quality and a world stability, this balance of powers
ensure us of more stability and more quality and more security, this is
the weakness of dictatorship and communism, they lack some of or all of
those mechanisms that bring more quality.


I have said yesterday the following:

--
Does morality exists ?

It is a very good philosophical question !

And that also is the most important question !

I have just thought more about it, and you have to listen to this:

I have defined and proved that efficient morality as being:

Performance and reliability.

But you have to understand something deeper than this !

Democracy of today is a balance of power between "performance" and "reliability", democracy is like a process that balance more correctly
the two powers of: performance in one side and reliability in the other
side ! and this then can be defined as a more appropriate morality.

But dictatorship like dictatorship of China can not be called
appropriate morality, because it doesn't have the correct mechanism of democracy to balance more correctly between performance and reliability.

This is why Dictatorship is dangerous ! and dictatorship can not be
called an appropriate morality ! .
--


I have said the above because look at nazism and neo-nazism, nazism and neo-nazism is racism, but you have not to be fooled by nazism and
neo-nazism, because it is racism also from inside the system and racism
from outside the system, this is why it has persecuted the handicaped
people ! because this kind of racism is "maximization" of efficiency !
and this "maximization" of efficiency is "performance", so
since as i have showed that efficient morality is performance
and reliability, so nazism and neo-nazism do neglect "reliability"
, because there maximization of efficiency is violence that causes
violence inside the system. This is why i have said above that
dictatorship doesn't "balance" correctly between performance and
reliability.

I have said , read bellow, that:

Hitler viewed jews as being "anormal" and more "violent"

and i have said, read bellow, that:

Nazism was not based correctly on science

We have to be more scientific:

So we have to ask ourselves a question:

Is the affirmation of Hitler correct or not correct ?

Is the affirmation of Hitler such as saying that jews are abnormal
and more violent , correct or not correct ?

I think that Hitler was not correct, because we can not say all jews
are bad people, there is a certain still small "percentage" of jews
that are bad, but we can not generalize to all jews and say all
jews are bad, this is the same for arabs, we can not say all arabs are
bad people, because there is only a still "small" percentage of arabs
that are bad, but we can not generalize and say that all arabs are bad.
So we have to refrain from talking like Hitler and we have to be more realistic. And yet we have to make a distinction between "tolerable"
and bad, because the big percentage of arabs are "tolerable" and not
bad, i think it is the same for jews, even if they are not as beautiful
as white europeans. So case is closed !


Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

More precision about the true essence of nazism, read again:

We have to get into philosophy , philosophy is like mathematics
and it must adhere to the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness , so it must be "precise" and precise "calculations", and
its goal must be the goal of wisdom that is to comprehend or to know !

So what is the true essence of nazism?

1- The living conditions

The living conditions of Germans in the time of Hitler were still too
much difficult, so German people were suffering, because life in the
time of Hitler was still a real difficult task.

2- The consequence

The consequence of this really bad living conditions is that Hitler
was much more violent than average people, so he has
choosen to "maximize" "efficiency" because he was a true "racist" and
nazism was also "racism", so he has started violently to kill handicaped
people to be more efficient, and to maximize efficiency he has started
to kill jews, because jews for him were an evil for different reasons:
because also he has viewed jews as being capitalists ! so since he was socialist, he has used, like communists, the tool of "Class Struggle" of communism and he has started violently persecuting jews and killing
them, communists also has persecuted the capitalists !
also Hitler has wanted to kill jews because he has viewed jews
as being "anormal" and more "violent", even if his thinking was not
based on science ! that was also the weakness of nazism, because
this was not based on science. For example when Hitler has said
that German people was the superior "race" over the others,
yet this affirmation was not based on science, so i think
also that nazism was not based correctly on science.

And here is my other proof that nazism and neo-nazism
are not accepted by efficient morality:

Futility of nazism and neo-nazism..

Nazism and neo-nazism are childish in that they want violently to
maximize efficiency, this is the essence of nazism , it wants also
to maximize efficiency even using violence, so we can not be confident
with nazism and neo-nazism because they are like childish ideologies
because they are not thought correctly.

You have to know about efficient morality, i have said that efficient
morality is performance and reliability, and morality is composed of
a priori pure moral inferred from reason and empirical moral inferred
from experience, but that's not so efficient because we have to include
what i called "guidance of moral": like happiness and tolerance that are
parts of the "set" of our essence, because we are capable of knowing
them and feeling them and measuring with them, i think that this
guidance of moral is a prerequisite to counter nazism and neo-nazism,
because nazism says to maximize efficiency even with violence, but since guidance of moral that is inherent to us and a priori pure moral that
takes into account reliability says that this act of nazism that
maximize efficiency even with violence that it is an extremism that is
too violent, because reliability sees this act of nazism as being too
violent that causes violence, and guidance of moral that is inherent to
almost all of us sees this act of nazism as being not acceptable , so
nazism and neo-nazism is out of question and they are not accepted by
efficient morality.

The essence of Nazism..

So what is the essence of Nazism ?

When we become smart we have to find the shortest path to the solution,
here it is:

Nazism is also racism, but this racism of nazism is a violent racism
that maximizes efficiency, and this racism that maximizes efficiency is
a racism towards others that are not us, and it is a violent racism
towards us, this is why nazism has tried to exterminate handicaped
people, but you have to be careful with nazism because it tries also to exterminate the weak members to maximize efficiency, this is inherent to nazism, so imagine that we are attaining general artificial
intelligence, so nazism can say by maximizing efficiency
to exterminate humans that are not needed for a best efficiency,
this is why nazism or neo-nazism is violent and dangerous.



I have said:

"because a society is constrained by general morality such as laws
that states that what is bad is "relative" to our
level of sophistication by performance and reliability or if you want
that it is relative to the level of quality that we have attained, this
is why i have said, that corruption of morality is measured by
the level of "quality" that we have attained or if you want by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness"

Is there any contradiction or is there a "bug" ?

No, in the above i have said that: "because a society is constrained by
general morality such as laws that states that what is bad is
"relative" to our level of sophistication by performance and reliability"

So i am stating that it is the level of quality that we have attained
by performance and reliability, so morality is constrained by
reliability, so you can not simply say that corruption of morality is
measured by the level of "quality", this will introduce a "bug" that
can bring violence to the system, so measuring of corruption of
morality is measured by and relative to performance and reliability, so
hope you have understood this distinction. And morality is then safe !

Read again my "final" corrected post

About our humanity

What do you think i have done also by constructing my political philosophy ?

I have done like philosophy.

And i have showed that the essence of our humanity is perfection and
strongness that gives rise to "hate", it is that we want to be
perfection and more strong that we hate the others, also i have showed
what is morality and what is efficient morality, i have showed that
efficient morality is performance and reliability, it is like saying it
is the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness, and
efficient morality that is performance and reliability gives rise
to a level of "quality" by wich we are measuring corruption of morality, because a society is constrained by general morality such as laws
that states that what is bad is "relative" to our
level of sophistication by performance and reliability or if you want
that it is relative to the level of quality that we have attained, this
is why i have said, that corruption of morality is measured by
the level of "quality" that we have attained or if you want by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness, and it is how
also we are measuring craziness or foolishness , by this level of
quality that we have attained, it's this "relativeness" that permits us
to measure corrruption of morality.

Please read the rest of my thoughts:

About the essence of philosophy

What do you think is philosophy?

How do you think you can understand the essence of laws and laws?

How do you think you can understand morality ?

Philosophy is like the light that has given rise to morality !

Let me please ask you a question ?

If i ask a question of how can you measure corruption of morality
and i ask you to come up with an efficient answer that abstract well,
you have to be capable of "philosophy", this is what i am doing..

Philosophy is like feeling better our world, it is feeling the essence
of its parts !

When i say for example in my philosophy that essence of humanity
is perfection and strongness, you are feeling more this essence,
and you start to be more efficient in your thinking , and when
i say that relativeness that is part of our essence do permit
us to measure corruption by relativeness to the essence of
our humanity that is perfection and strongness, you are again
feeling more the essence of our humanity, and philosophy permit
you to climb and to climb by knowing the essence of our humanity
and by comprehending more, for example i have proved that
efficient morality is morality is performance and reliability,
but this definition lacks abstraction, because idiocy of maximization of efficiency of neo-nazism and nazism will interpret it not correctly,
so we have to be efficient abstraction that knows how to define
morality with the right words that model correctly morality
as a whole ! this is how i am doing in my political philosophy,
i am climbing and climbing..

Please read again, to notice it:

Do we have to fear morality ?

I said before that efficient morality is performance and reliability,
those two, performance and reliability do model efficient morality as a
whole ! but this is not a finality, because efficient morality is
constrained by empirical moral that says that "intolerance" that hurts
the system causes violence in the system, and efficient morality is
constrained also by what i called guidance of moral and is constrained
by "security" that is part of the the essence of efficient morality that
is reliability, this is why you are feeling that morality must be
abstracted correctly, and abstraction is the act of abstracting also to
the "essentials" or to the "priorities": if you want, so if i say to you
that efficient morality is performance and reliability , that's
like a necessary definition that approximate more correctly efficient
morality , but to be more "precise" and more precise calculations like
though it is scientific, and that's also the goal of wisdom ! we have
to abstract efficiently ! so a good abstraction do dictats to us
to include in morality what i called guidance of moral that is like
happiness and tolerance that are parts of the "set" of our essence,
because we are capable of knowing them and feeling them and measuring
with them ! not only that but guidance of moral must be showed correctly
in the definition of efficient morality, this guidance of moral shows us
also the good way and permits us to "measure" more correctly and permits
us to be more tolerant ! and guidance of moral is a light to our
democracy ! this is part of the essence of relativeness that is the
most important part of our essence that permits us to measure corruption
of morality by relativeness to the essence of our humanity that is
perfection and strongness ! and please read the rest to be better
equipped and to understand better my thoughts:

The essence of corruption of morality

This is a good subject of philosophy, philosophy is like
mathematics, and wisdom is like mathematics, because
the goal of wisdom is to comprehend ! and to comprehend
you have to constrain more by the essence of humanity,
that means by perfection and strongness ! how are perfection and
strongness useful ! survival is usefulness ! we can not separate
the two ! it is a dictatorship that constrain democracy !
it is as it dictates to democracy ! and we are noticing
it and feeling it with our consciousness ! and we are
feeling it with what i called guidance of moral that
is like happiness and tolerance that are parts of the "set" of our
essence, because we are capable of knowing them and feeling them and
measuring with them, and how we must be careful to notice that
the "application" of morality as an efficient morality is part
of the essence of morality and this is the most important part
that gives rise to a scientific discipline and a technical discipline,
that's also "beautifulness" of our humanity, the essence of humanity is perfection and strongness that make us able to measure corruption !
the essence of corruption is also "relativeness" that is being part
of it and it is as if we say that such part is relative to such
part ! "relativeness" also is our essence ! and it is one of the most
important part ! how can we be lost without it ! because relativeness
to efficient morality is the correct way, and efficient morality
is performance and reliability, i mean that performance and reliability
alone do model efficient morality as a whole, and i have proved it
to you in my previous posts, so corruption of morality is also
relativeness to performance and reliability, this is why you have seeing
me saying on my previous posts the following:

I have defined efficient morality as being: Performance and reliability.

But is it a correct definition?

Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so
what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so
if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not reliable, this
is why i have said that efficient morality is Performance and reliability.

Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

I will get into political philosophy..

Here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's related
to the general morality..

I will first remember you about my last writing about the essence
of humanity:

And what is the essence of humanity ?

This is a good question in political philosophy.

When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important ingredients ?

I think the ingredients are:

Perfection and Strongness.

The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
becoming more organized and less disorganized.


This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.


And this brings also hope.


I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.

Am i stupid to say that ?

If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with "nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.

So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's "perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.

Now here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's
related to the general morality:

Now i have explained that the essence of humanity is "Perfection" and
also Strongness, and perfection and strongness is also the essence of a
group, because we are also grouping together into different groups to be
more perfection and more strong, but this essence of humanity that is Perfection and strongness
must adhere to the general morality that must be an efficient morality,
but if it is not in accordance with the general morality, we must
enforce also general morality by laws, it is why we are managing our
societies by laws.

But what is also an efficient morality ?

About the essence of communism

You have not to fear communism, because empirical moral does constrain
it, it is like a general mathematical proof, communism must adhere
to optimization , because optimization is efficient morality, and
efficient morality is Liberty, and corruption of morality must
be measured by optimization itself that knows how to be optimization,
communism is finally being more conscious of itself, because
it is also more conscious of empirical moral.

What is the essence of philosophy ?

It is a very important question:

So we have to be smartness to answer this question:

Efficient morality is optimization and it is Liberty.

Philosophy is a magical word , like Liberty.

It is a generalization, it is like a general mathematical proof,
this is the essence of philosophy, philosophy must be efficient
morality, because it is a generalization, the word Philosophy is like
the King, it must adhere to the act of optimization, and optimization
is performance and reliability, now the essence of philosophy is more
clear and it shows that the essence of Beauty and the essence of
Happiness are the same , they are generalizations that must
take into account the guidance of moral and a priori pure
moral and empirical moral, and corruption of morality is measured
by optimization, and optimization must be an effort , because
Liberty is: discipline, progress and stableness, so the definition of
Liberty that is discipline and progress and stableness is a soft way
that ensure more the effort to realize this goal of Liberty, thus this
has to be enforced by the hard way too, that means by laws.

I have defined efficient morality as being performance and reliability
that includes security, so beauty is part of reliability because
reliability is the quality of performing consistently well, and to
perform consistently well, you have to be beauty and you have to be
social etc. please read my following political philosophy to understand
better my thoughts:

About the essence of optimization

I have defined optimization as being:

Performance and reliability.

But can we clear more that ?

Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the
ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our
other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that
is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance.

But if you define optimization like just being performance, that's
a dangerous definition that lacks abstraction.

Please read all the following to understand better:


What is the essence of organization ?

Those are the questions that we ask in courses of philosophy.

Now i have to be smartness and rationality and logic to answer this
question. Smartness is an important requirement that fulfill this
goal.

And you have to learn how to think Sir and Madam..

So how can we attack this problem ?

When you start thinking it is like also abstracting to the essentials to
be able to simplify our thinking..

So this process of abstraction needs also my smartness to decompose efficiently...

Smartness is also a fast process that finds fast the shortest path to
the solution or that finds the solution to the problem..

So my smartness will answer like this:

Look at our essence, we are a composition of consciousness and physical
body..

But we can try to say that we are guided by the process of survival of fittest..

But this is not good abstraction..

We have to be smartness..

So why do we need to organize ?

You will say that we have to be organized because of the process
survival of the fittest..

But this is a narrow view..

Because it is a definition that is pejorative and not efficient..

Because of the following question:

Why we need to survive better ?

It is because of our weaknesses.

But i say that it is still not a correct answer , because
it is too much abstraction that lacks efficiency.

Because our weaknesses need to be organized by optimization.


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)