[continued from previous message]
higher IQs including jews.
===
Here is my last proof on this that is more correct:
Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent
today, so it's like socialism in disguise inside capitalistic countries
that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the above problem
is solved mostly.
Also i will refine my proof:
Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the
benefit of science and development.
Thus my above proof says that letting Intellectual elites becoming rich
to a certain degree is authorized by empirical moral.
About the language of neo-nazism..
Neo-nazism says that since jews love a lot money, and since
because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich
faster without working hard and without suffering.. so neo-nazism
says that jews are not working as hard as the others , so neo-nazism
conclude that jews are more lazy, so neo-nazism conclude violently that
he must break the bones of jews for that.
This is childish view of neo-nazism...
And I think that neo-nazis lack wisdom..
Why ?
Here is my proof..
They say that jews, like arabs, are not as beautiful as white europeans..
But this is childish , because jews are tolerable, and are not violent people... so jews are tolerable.
Other than that neo-nazis say that jews love money..
But this is childish..
As i have said:
1- Even if the reference of your actions do not ensure success, it must maximize better your chance, it is like this that you have to reason
about your living conditions, and because rationality and logic and
science have a high priority , even if survival has a high priority too,
you have to know how to balance carefully and with wisdom, so
loving money or loving money to a certain degree is the way also to
maximize your chance.
Because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich
faster without working hard and without suffering.. but we have not to
hate this, because it is a principle of capitalism that is important,
because it is how we become rich as a nation, and because read also this:
And i have said that:
Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent
today, so it's like socialism to a certain degree inside capitalistic
countries that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the
above problem of Intellectual giftedness that become rich quickly and
more easily, is solved mostly, also i will refine my proof by adding this:
Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the
benefit of science and development.
Thus my above proof says that letting Intellectual elites, including
jews, loving money and becoming rich to a certain degree is authorized
by empirical moral.
Here is how i decompose morality:
1- The guidance of morality
2- All of a priori pure moral
3- Empirical moral
First, there is the guidance of morality that is part of a priori pure
moral, here is what i have said about it:
My wisdom is also inferred from philosophy..
The philosopher Kant has defined morality like a composition
of pure moral and empirical moral, so then morality is
dynamic, not static.
As a proof please read this about the philosopher Kant and you have
to understand it well:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-morality/
But me, i have spoken about pure morality as being happiness
like a reference that is the goal that guides our actions
and philosophies by saying this:
--
The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of
beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law
that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so
pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also
because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this
goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is
happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have
to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly.
--
Because morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical
moral..But a priori pure moral knows what is the ideal of justice and
the ideal of happiness and the ideal of purity and the ideal of
beauty.. and this essence is the consequence of our essence
that is capable of knowing this essence, and as you have noticed i have
also defined pure morality as happiness, and i have said
that pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness,
i mean that those ideals of justice and happiness and purity and
beauty have been attained by the noumenal world and our thoughts and
this has allowed us to be guided better and this is the light that
attracts us towards a better world, so we must respect it and fight for
it with wisdom.
I have also said about the guidance of morality this:
And how can we be more civilized ?
I have done philosophy..
We have to measure it easily to know about it..
Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the
weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us
to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure civilization.
This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.
So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.
The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..
If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
cause extremism and violence and desorder too.
Second, there is a priori pure moral that we infer from reason.
Third, there is empirical moral, and here is what i have said about it:
About morality..
You will say that morality is morality, we can know it also by feeling it..
But applying morality must be dealt with with wisdom and rationality and logic..
What says philosophy(read the philosopher Kant) ? that morality is a composition of a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
So the action of knowing morality by feeling it, is not sufficient,
because it's necessary to infer and apply empirical moral, but is it a corruption of morality ? since laws are also morality and science
is also morality because we are ruled by optimization of science also,
this is a serious subject, and you are in front of the very important
part of morality that is empirical moral, because morality must be
inferred from powers and counter-powers, this is a weakness of morality,
but what is amazing is that today we are lucky that
morality is not so bad, because read what i have written to
understand my views:
But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this
creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
systems by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other
than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)