• Read again, i correct a last typo, here is again my ,final post (3/3)

    From Intelli2@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 23:15:37 2018
    [continued from previous message]

    and confidence, and to attract consumers, so we have to accept also to
    be weak for sometime, like by making the price lower and in the same
    time making love and by respecting the consumer, but this is a wisdom
    that in economy can pay and win in the future.. and also because economy
    that is a cause of richness is also constrained by because in economy, confidence and love is very important, because you have also to treat
    the consumers with love and respect to higher there confidence in you
    and to consume and more services and/or products from you. So since
    economy is part of the game , and a better economy is also a consequence
    of confidence and love, so we have to be careful on our philosophy to
    not make hate hurt our economic and living conditions, so this is a prerequisite for our philosophy, this essence of my proof takes into
    account not just the noumenal world , but also the empirical world, and
    the essence of philosophy is part of the game, and the tools of
    philosophy is also mathematical logic and measure, we must not escape
    from this facts because our survival is a consequence of this reality.

    Other than that the essence of richness is constrained by the essence
    of compassion that is a consequence of the essence of survival, because
    the essence of more compassion causes law and order, so we have to
    impose this richness to be more compassionated towards the nation and
    the weakest members of the nation, and we have to impose the richness by
    the essence of the law to invest more in the productive capitalism to
    higher employment and to better the living conditions, and all this must
    be done with wisdom, and as also i said in my previous proof:

    Can the essence of quality kill the essence of compassion ?

    I think that we must not be blind and notice that the essence
    of quality must recognize the advantages of the criterion of compassion, science can not be extremist and reject violently compassion, because compassion is also an important advantage, because saving the weaker is
    also an important thing, so a better behavior is to take into account
    the two criteria: performance and compassion.

    to make my proof better i will add this:

    That the essence of survival is constrained by compassion, because
    not neglecting compassion causes order, so if you neglect violently
    compassion you risk desorder and violence.

    and to make my proof better i will also add this:

    Not suffering is an important thing, and making suffer who do make
    suffer must be taken with care, because not suffering is a really
    important thing, so not making suffer the one who makes suffer is
    also a very important thing, so this is part of the essence of tolerance
    , and the essence of tolerance must be constrained with essence of
    quality by taking into account my logical proof.

    This logical proof is constrained by the essence of quality that is
    constrained by logic and measure, because logic and measure is part
    of science, and that is also more science.


    And what is being a disciplined nation ?

    You have first to set the reference of your actions, the reference must
    be more science and more logic and more rationality, and we have to
    learn how to love and respect to follow this reference of your actions
    by giving them a high priority, this is how you can enhance the quality
    of your nation and this is how it is being disciplined.

    Even if the reference of your actions do not ensure success, it must
    maximize better your chance, it is like this that you have to reason
    about your living conditions, and because rationality and logic and
    science have a high priority , even if survival has a high priority too,
    you have to know how to balance carefully and with wisdom.


    Being disciplined is not saying that i am courageous and i am a machist..

    This is an old way of thinking..

    You have to enhance yourself with rationality and logic and science
    to be able to set your perception and to set morality.. and morality
    can not be set correctly without being conscious , and being conscious
    is being better conscious of empirical world and being better conscious
    of science and technology, because science is part of morality today
    and empirical moral is a part of morality.

    This is has to be our way.

    Also i have just said this:

    ===
    My proof about political ideologies..

    I have taken a look at communism and capitalism, and i think there is
    still a problem to clear , it's the one of the intellectual elites..

    Intellectual elites can easily become rich because Intellectual
    giftedness render the intellectual job for them easy and make them rich
    quickly and more easily.

    So there is a problem.

    But there is still a proof, that an IQ of 110 can still find
    difficult its job, so since there is still suffering for IQs of 110
    , so we can not categorize easily those categories of IQ of 110
    as becoming rich quickly and easily.

    So communism has still a problem with intellectual Elites that has much
    higher IQs including jews.
    ===


    Here is my last proof on this that is more correct:

    Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent
    today, so it's like socialism in disguise inside capitalistic countries
    that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the above problem
    is solved mostly.

    Also i will refine my proof:

    Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the
    benefit of science and development.

    Thus my above proof says that letting Intellectual elites becoming rich
    to a certain degree is authorized by empirical moral.


    About the language of neo-nazism..

    Neo-nazism says that since jews love a lot money, and since
    because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich
    faster without working hard and without suffering.. so neo-nazism
    says that jews are not working as hard as the others , so neo-nazism
    conclude that jews are more lazy, so neo-nazism conclude violently that
    he must break the bones of jews for that.

    This is childish view of neo-nazism...

    And I think that neo-nazis lack wisdom..

    Why ?

    Here is my proof..

    They say that jews, like arabs, are not as beautiful as white europeans..

    But this is childish , because jews are tolerable, and are not violent people... so jews are tolerable.


    Other than that neo-nazis say that jews love money..

    But this is childish..

    As i have said:

    1- Even if the reference of your actions do not ensure success, it must maximize better your chance, it is like this that you have to reason
    about your living conditions, and because rationality and logic and
    science have a high priority , even if survival has a high priority too,
    you have to know how to balance carefully and with wisdom, so
    loving money or loving money to a certain degree is the way also to
    maximize your chance.

    Because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich
    faster without working hard and without suffering.. but we have not to
    hate this, because it is a principle of capitalism that is important,
    because it is how we become rich as a nation, and because read also this:

    And i have said that:

    Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent
    today, so it's like socialism to a certain degree inside capitalistic
    countries that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the
    above problem of Intellectual giftedness that become rich quickly and
    more easily, is solved mostly, also i will refine my proof by adding this:

    Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the
    benefit of science and development.

    Thus my above proof says that letting Intellectual elites, including
    jews, loving money and becoming rich to a certain degree is authorized
    by empirical moral.

    Here is how i decompose morality:

    1- The guidance of morality

    2- All of a priori pure moral

    3- Empirical moral


    First, there is the guidance of morality that is part of a priori pure
    moral, here is what i have said about it:

    My wisdom is also inferred from philosophy..

    The philosopher Kant has defined morality like a composition
    of pure moral and empirical moral, so then morality is
    dynamic, not static.

    As a proof please read this about the philosopher Kant and you have
    to understand it well:

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-morality/

    But me, i have spoken about pure morality as being happiness
    like a reference that is the goal that guides our actions
    and philosophies by saying this:

    --
    The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of
    beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law
    that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so
    pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also
    because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this
    goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is
    happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have
    to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly.
    --

    Because morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical
    moral..But a priori pure moral knows what is the ideal of justice and
    the ideal of happiness and the ideal of purity and the ideal of
    beauty.. and this essence is the consequence of our essence
    that is capable of knowing this essence, and as you have noticed i have
    also defined pure morality as happiness, and i have said
    that pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness,
    i mean that those ideals of justice and happiness and purity and
    beauty have been attained by the noumenal world and our thoughts and
    this has allowed us to be guided better and this is the light that
    attracts us towards a better world, so we must respect it and fight for
    it with wisdom.

    I have also said about the guidance of morality this:

    And how can we be more civilized ?

    I have done philosophy..

    We have to measure it easily to know about it..

    Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
    that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the
    weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us
    to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
    i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
    power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
    part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
    degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
    by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
    essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
    civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
    not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
    because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
    and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure civilization.

    This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.

    So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.

    The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..

    If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
    because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
    of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
    but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
    constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
    being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
    etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
    of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
    is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
    of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
    to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
    social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
    that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
    cause extremism and violence and desorder too.


    Second, there is a priori pure moral that we infer from reason.

    Third, there is empirical moral, and here is what i have said about it:

    About morality..

    You will say that morality is morality, we can know it also by feeling it..

    But applying morality must be dealt with with wisdom and rationality and logic..

    What says philosophy(read the philosopher Kant) ? that morality is a composition of a priori pure moral and empirical moral..

    So the action of knowing morality by feeling it, is not sufficient,
    because it's necessary to infer and apply empirical moral, but is it a corruption of morality ? since laws are also morality and science
    is also morality because we are ruled by optimization of science also,
    this is a serious subject, and you are in front of the very important
    part of morality that is empirical moral, because morality must be
    inferred from powers and counter-powers, this is a weakness of morality,
    but what is amazing is that today we are lucky that
    morality is not so bad, because read what i have written to
    understand my views:

    But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
    morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
    because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
    is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
    not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
    counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
    the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
    and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
    have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this
    creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
    systems by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other
    than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
    mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
    organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
    and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
    violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
    to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally.


    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)