• About the essence of socialism (3/3)

    From Intelli2@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 17:28:37 2018
    [continued from previous message]

    that is capable of knowing this essence, and as you have noticed i have
    also defined pure morality as happiness, and i have said
    that pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness,
    i mean that those ideals of justice and happiness and purity and
    beauty have been attained by the noumenal world and our thoughts and
    this has allowed us to be guided better and this is the light that
    attracts us towards a better world, so we must respect it and fight for
    it with wisdom.

    I have also said about the guidance of morality this:

    And how can we be more civilized ?

    I have done philosophy..

    We have to measure it easily to know about it..

    Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
    that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the
    weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us
    to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
    i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
    power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
    part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
    degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
    by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
    essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
    civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
    not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
    because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
    and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure civilization.

    This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.

    So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.

    The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..

    If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
    because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
    of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
    but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
    constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
    being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
    etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
    of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
    is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
    of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
    to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
    social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
    that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
    cause extremism and violence and desorder too.


    Second, there is a priori pure moral that we infer from reason.

    Third, there is empirical moral, and here is what i have said about it:

    About morality..

    You will say that morality is morality, we can know it also by feeling it..

    But applying morality must be dealt with with wisdom and rationality and logic..

    What says philosophy(read the philosopher Kant) ? that morality is a composition of a priori pure moral and empirical moral..

    So the action of knowing morality by feeling it, is not sufficient,
    because it's necessary to infer and apply empirical moral, but is it a corruption of morality ? since laws are also morality and science
    is also morality because we are ruled by optimization of science also,
    this is a serious subject, and you are in front of the very important
    part of morality that is empirical moral, because morality must be
    inferred from powers and counter-powers, this is a weakness of morality,
    but what is amazing is that today we are lucky that
    morality is not so bad, because read what i have written to
    understand my views:

    But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
    morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
    because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
    is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
    not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
    counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
    the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
    and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
    have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this
    creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
    systems by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other
    than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
    mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
    organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
    and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
    violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
    to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index internationally and locally.


    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)