[continued from previous message]
violence and extremism and desorder, so you have not to neglect
them , and you have to know how to higher consumer confidence index
to better optimize economy world wide, so for that you have to know how
to avoid hate towards other people that causes problems to economy ,
because it hurts consumer confidence index, and you have to know to not
get into communism and to avoid extremism of communism because communism
is too extreme and its extremism causes violence, so you have to know
how to tune those variables of compassion and respect and love and how
to optimize the system, and how to do it ? by being for example more
social like being social democracy and or being social Liberalism, hope
you have understood my proof.. and this is not finished because you have
to think about immigration, and here is what i have said about immigration:
In parallel computer programming we have to optimize, like by
reducing the size of the serial part, and by reducing the cache
coherence traffic etc. and this to render your software or algorithm
scalable, so we are concerned by the scalability criterion..
Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example
that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that
arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy
and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent
people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and
optimization has been rendered by those constraints to as the following:
If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to
low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the
consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world
order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries..
About America and the world..
Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs ,
but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated
OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more
decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient
and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not
monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object
oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same
for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not
being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so
today because of constraints on optimization, usefulness is interpreted
not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as
white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's
like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist,
you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize
and to not cause problems to societies.
And how can we be more civilized ?
I have done philosophy..
We have to measure it easily to know about it..
Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
that dictates
to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the weakers among us,
so then this is corruption of morality that permit us to measure
corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure civilization.
This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.
So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.
The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..
If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
cause extremism and violence and desorder too.
About the essence of corruption of morality..
It's like doing philosophy..
You will say that since life is still unjust and not fair, so
how can we be still morality ? or how can you still speak of corruption
of morality ? since life is a difficult job and since when we are
treated unjustly and unfairly by life we have the tendency to neglect
high standards of morality.
This is not philosophy Sir ! this is stupidity !
Because justice has to constrain happiness..
And responsability has to constrain justice..
But responsability is influenced by the degree of suffering or
or by the degree of difficulty, so since life is still a difficult job,
so the variables of suffer and difficulty are important, so the higher importance that we give to suffering and to difficulty, because
of life is still a difficult job, constrain responsability by making it
be more morality, not less morality.
So stupid people have the tendency to not think correctly.
About the essence of responsability..
I have said about morality that:
Justice has to constrain happiness..
And responsability has to constrain justice..
But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance ,
so if we are more tolerance we can neglect reponsability and
thus neglect justice and neglect morality.
And if we are also a kind of tolerance we can avoid the extreme justice
of communism. But this is not easy to convince communism, so to be
able to convince communism, you have to say to communism that
Class Struggle of communism is empirically difficult to realize because
it's too much violence, and since it's too much violence, so communism
must be avoided because it's too extreme justice that causes too much
violence.
So we have to be more wisdom to be better at tuning the variable
of tolerance to better optimize responsability.
Getting on more philosophy
You are giving too much importance to the Leadership..
This is an old way of thinking that is inferior..
Because Leadership is not like monolithic today, it's more
decentralized, economy is not managed by Clinton or Donald Trump,
management of economy is given to another person of the team than Donald
Trump or Clinton, and other tasks are given to different persons
of the team than Donald Trump, Donald Trump is only one person that is
part of a team..there is also the congress that is deciding , not just
the president, so the Leadership is more decentralized today.
So I have to learn you the basics of wisdom..
My wisdom is also inferred from philosophy..
The philosopher Kant has defined morality like a composition
of pure morality and empirical morality, so then morality is
dynamic, not static.
As a proof please read this about the philosopher Kant and you have
to understand it well:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-morality/
But me, i have spoken about pure morality as being happiness
like a reference that is the goal that guides our actions
and philosophies by saying this:
--
The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of
beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law
that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so
pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also
because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this
goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is
happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have
to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly.
--
But you have to learn another wisdom:
That neo-nazis have a genetical trait in commun, it is that they are
violent people, and this can be inferred with science of statistics
by looking at there behavior and violent acts..
This neo-nazis that are genetically violent persons have been corrrupted
by there violence , i mean that there morality is corrupt, because since
they are violent people they have the tendency to act by instincts and pulsions, and there instincts and pulsions are violence, so we have to
stay far from those crazy people like neo-nazis.
Now please read the rest of my post to understand better my thoughts:
I have spoken about the essence of pure morality and said that:
The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of
beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law
that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so
pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also
because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this
goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is
happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have
to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly.
Now what is the essence of capitalism ?
We are not so smart , so we must proceed also by simplifying the logical reasonning, it is like when you are simplifying and proving by
contradiction, so allow me to notice that capitalism uses concurrence as
a tool, it is the act of concurring for survival and concurring for more
money, this essence of concurrence must be understood because it can be detrimental to our survival, because the essence of capitalism dictates
to us the need to attain a global maximum of the profit, and this can do
harm on the weakest members among us, it is like i have said that
compassion must compensate for performance and for the awfulness sides
of concurrence, so concurrence is the fondamental tool of capitalism but
it must be dealt with with wisdom, and the essence of wisdom dictates
that compassion dictates that we must compensate with compassion and
treat people with respect, hence helping people with social services and
more social and economic justice is i think an important thing, because
i have said that:
I have just spoken about the essence of transcendence and i have spoken
also about the essence of egoism..
Now about the essence of democracy..
The essence of egoism is related to democracy, because as soon
as we get into more trouble, we have the tendency to choose a more
extremist nationalism, Donald Trump also is extremist nationalism
mixed with the taste of narcessism and arrogance of Donald Trump that
is not what we call wisdom , so democracy now is not yet capable of
controling and guiding better our democratic choices, but we hope that
with more intellectual effort we will able to enhance the quality of the people, so we have to stay optimistic even in this more troubled water
of extremist nationalism, please read the rest of previous posts to
understand more:
The essence of egoism..
To not get into much complexity, please note that egoism is the
source of the problem, and is the source of nationalism, nationalism
today has the tendency to get into simplistic thinking that doesn't take
into account our future, and this not efficiency, today is not like
tomorrow and tomorrow is not like after tomorrow, morality and wisdom
are dynamic, and not static, and simplistic thinking gets us into
trouble, we have to sophisticate our thinking taking into account all
the factors, wisdom must be learned from wisdom and wisdom is the light,
so becareful of our instincts and pulsions that gets us into
egoism and trouble, you have to set the reference today, and
the reference to follow must be able to transcend our living conditions
with intellectual effort and wisdom, and this is the problem of Israel,
so Israel must think twice and not neglecting to manage efficiently
tomorrow , because i said the following:
The essence of transcendence..
We want to transcend our living conditions, but transcendence does come
with a price: intellectual effort and wisdom that bring more quality
that transcend our living conditions frontiers.. our instincts and
pulsions can makes us believe that something is not good for us,
but it gets good when we are able to transcend..simplistic thinking
is the Antithesis of transcendence, so simplistic thinking must
be enhanced into a sophisticated thinking using rationality and wisdom
and science.. Israel was and is not easy to construct and manage,
and since it is not easy, Israel has the tendency to get into hating
others like arabs, but this is a narrow view of simplistic thinking
that must be enhanced by Israel, because compassion and respect
are also order and efficiency and virility, so Israel has not to be
blind and manage only today , Israel has to manage also tomorrow
efficiently and be able to transcend its living conditions by
intellectual effort and wisdom that will get it into the way
of more unification with arabs, and this has to be trascended by
doing more projects and more economy and more business with arabs,
the future is to unification, because unification is more efficiency
and performance and prosperity.
Here is what i have said about compassion and respect:
The essence of thought..
When you want to define something, let it be jews, you have
to find the consequences of being a jew, and those consequences
allow us to define the thing or the jews.
Philosophy is also finding the causes and consequences..
So as you have seen me doing , i have found the consequences
of compassion that is order and efficiency and virility,
so it has allowed me to define more correctly compassion
by saying this:
We have to use logic and measure, and this is more science..
So how can we understand compassion?
What's compassion ?
It can be genetical, because i am of a type of a wise person that is compassionate.
But compassion is also cultural..
Compassion causes respect, and respect is also compassion..
So Neglecting compassion causes desorder and violence..
So compassion causes order and peace, and order and peace cause efficiency.
So compassion is also efficiency.
So compassion is also virility because it's also efficiency, its
virility is the cause and consequence of culture and ideas.
This why i have said with logic and measure that is also more science
the following:
About the essence of survival...
Science and philosophy can make you laugh, here is why:
We are always guided by the survival of the fittest.
But survival of the fittest is also compassion and weakness,
because compassion causes order so it causes quality, so quality
is strongness , so compassion is also survival of the fittest, and
survival of the fittest is also weakness, because the science
of fuzzy logic and logic say:
In the essence weakness we have a great wisdom, because economy
is a consequence of love and respect and confidence, and to attract
consumers we have to accept also to be weak , like by
making the price lower and in the same time making love and by
respecting the consumer, but this is a wisdom that in economy can pay
and win in the future.. so there is a wisdom in weakness.
Now i will use more logic and measure to prove to you that even
though my previous proof has proved that compassion is part
of the essence of richness and that compassion causes order,
so compassion is mandatory to the the essence of law and order,
and neglecting compassion can cause desorder, now the interpretation
of how much compassion was leaved to the reader of my previous proof,
but now i will not leave my previous proof to interpretations that can
cause violent extremism, because the degree of compassion needed in the
system must be interpreted as avoiding extremism that can cause hate and violence and desorder, so the degree of compassion must be approximated
by a political party such as social democracy or social Liberalism, and
this tells us a lot about the political party of Donald Trump that is
more oriented toward economy and that neglects more the social side , so
my proof dictates that it must lean toward more social like social in
social democracy because this is in accordance with this proof that
avoids violent extremism.
Please read my previous proof to understand more my views:
About the essence of richness...
You will say that intelligence and money and economy etc are all parts
of richness..
I know that..
But in my previous proof i have taken care to make clear with my proof
that compassion is part of the essence of the richness...
Please read again my proof:
Here is my enhanced proof about the essence of richness...
We have to define the essence, so:
The essence of something is the qualities that serve to characterize or identify something.
So i will enhance and explain more my previous proof:
I have said that:
What is the essence of richness ?
So, what is those qualities that serve to characterize or identify
richness ?
We have to notice that to answer this question we have to take
into account not just the noumenal world , but the phenomenal world also..
So you will notice in the phenomenal world that the essence of
compassion constrain the essence of richness, because compassion causes
order that is indispensable to the force of law , so compassion is a
quality that serve to characterize richness , so it is thus part of
the essence of richness, i have said also that the essence of weakness constrain the essence of richness, because weakness is also a necessary
quality for the essence of economy that is the cause of richness,
because weakness is a quality that characterize also richness, because
of the wisdom that because economy is a consequence of love and respect
and confidence, and to attract consumers, so we have to accept also to
be weak for sometime, like by making the price lower and in the same
time making love and by respecting the consumer, but this is a wisdom
that in economy can pay and win in the future.. and also because economy
that is a cause of richness is also constrained by because in economy, confidence and love is very important, because you have also to treat
the consumers with love and respect to higher there confidence in you
and to consume and more services and/or products from you. So since
economy is part of the game , and a better economy is also a consequence
of confidence and love, so we have to be careful on our philosophy to
not make hate hurt our economic and living conditions, so this is a prerequisite for our philosophy, this essence of my proof takes into
account not just the noumenal world , but also the empirical world, and
the essence of philosophy is part of the game, and the tools of
philosophy is also mathematical logic and measure, we must not escape
from this facts because our survival is a consequence of this reality.
Other than that the essence of richness is constrained by the essence
of compassion that is a consequence of the essence of survival, because
the essence of more compassion causes law and order, so we have to
impose this richness to be more compassionated towards the nation and
the weakest members of the nation, and we have to impose the richness by
the essence of the law to invest more in the productive capitalism to
higher employment and to better the living conditions, and all this must
be done with wisdom, and as also i said in my previous proof:
Can the essence of quality kill the essence of compassion ?
I think that we must not be blind and notice that the essence
of quality must recognize the advantages of the criterion of compassion, science can not be extremist and reject violently compassion, because compassion is also an important advantage, because saving the weaker is
also an important thing, so a better behavior is to take into account
the two criteria: performance and compassion.
to make my proof better i will add this:
That the essence of survival is constrained by compassion, because
not neglecting compassion causes order, so if you neglect violently
compassion you risk desorder and violence.
and to make my proof better i will also add this:
Not suffering is an important thing, and making suffer who do make
suffer must be taken with care, because not suffering is a really
important thing, so not making suffer the one who makes suffer is
also a very important thing, so this is part of the essence of tolerance
, and the essence of tolerance must be constrained with essence of
quality by taking into account my logical proof.
This logical proof is constrained by the essence of quality that is
constrained by logic and measure, because logic and measure is part
of science, and that is also more science.
And what is being a disciplined nation ?
You have first to set the reference of your actions, the reference must
be more science and more logic and more rationality, and we have to
learn how to love and respect to follow this reference of your actions
by giving them a high priority, this is how you can enhance the quality
of your nation and this is how it is being disciplined.
Even if the reference of your actions do not ensure success, it must
maximize better your chance, it is like this that you have to reason
about your living conditions, and because rationality and logic and
science have a high priority , even if survival has a high priority too,
you have to know how to balance carefully and with wisdom.
Being disciplined is not saying that i am courageous and i am a machist..
This is an old way of thinking..
You have to enhance yourself with rationality and logic and science
to be able to set your perception and to set morality.. and morality
can not be set correctly without being conscious , and being conscious
is being better conscious of empirical world and being better conscious
of science and technology, because science is part of morality today
and empirical moral is a part of morality.
This is has to be our way.
Also i have just said this:
===
My proof about political ideologies..
I have taken a look at communism and capitalism, and i think there is
still a problem to clear , it's the one of the intellectual elites..
Intellectual elites can easily become rich because Intellectual
giftedness render the intellectual job for them easy and make them rich
quickly and more easily.
So there is a problem.
But there is still a proof, that an IQ of 110 can still find
difficult its job, so since there is still suffering for IQs of 110
, so we can not categorize easily those categories of IQ of 110
as becoming rich quickly and easily.
So communism has still a problem with intellectual Elites that has much
higher IQs including jews.
===
Here is my last proof on this that is more correct:
Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent
today, so it's like socialism in disguise inside capitalistic countries
that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the above problem
is solved mostly.
Also i will refine my proof:
Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the
benefit of science and development.
Thus my above proof says that letting Intellectual elites becoming rich
to a certain degree is authorized by empirical moral.
About the language of neo-nazism..
Neo-nazism says that since jews love a lot money, and since
because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich
faster without working hard and without suffering.. so neo-nazism
says that jews are not working as hard as the others , so neo-nazism
conclude that jews are more lazy, so neo-nazism conclude violently that
he must break the bones of jews for that.
This is childish view of neo-nazism...
And I think that neo-nazis lack wisdom..
Why ?
Here is my proof..
They say that jews, like arabs, are not as beautiful as white europeans..
But this is childish , because jews are tolerable, and are not violent people... so jews are tolerable.
Other than that neo-nazis say that jews love money..
But this is childish..
As i have said:
1- Even if the reference of your actions do not ensure success, it must maximize better your chance, it is like this that you have to reason
about your living conditions, and because rationality and logic and
science have a high priority , even if survival has a high priority too,
you have to know how to balance carefully and with wisdom, so
loving money or loving money to a certain degree is the way also to
maximize your chance.
Because of Intellectual giftedness of jews, so jews can become rich
faster without working hard and without suffering.. but we have not to
hate this, because it is a principle of capitalism that is important,
because it is how we become rich as a nation, and because read also this:
And i have said that:
Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent
today, so it's like socialism to a certain degree inside capitalistic
countries that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the
above problem of Intellectual giftedness that become rich quickly and
more easily, is solved mostly, also i will refine my proof by adding this:
Intellectual elites has to sacrifice for money to maximize better the
benefit of science and development.
Thus my above proof says that letting Intellectual elites, including
jews, loving money and becoming rich to a certain degree is authorized
by empirical moral.
Here is how i decompose morality:
1- The guidance of morality
2- All of a priori pure moral
3- Empirical moral
First, there is the guidance of morality that is part of a priori pure
moral, here is what i have said about it:
My wisdom is also inferred from philosophy..
The philosopher Kant has defined morality like a composition
of pure moral and empirical moral, so then morality is
dynamic, not static.
As a proof please read this about the philosopher Kant and you have
to understand it well:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-morality/
But me, i have spoken about pure morality as being happiness
like a reference that is the goal that guides our actions
and philosophies by saying this:
--
The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of
beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law
that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so
pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also
because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this
goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is
happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have
to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly.
--
Because morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical
moral..But a priori pure moral knows what is the ideal of justice and
the ideal of happiness and the ideal of purity and the ideal of
beauty.. and this essence is the consequence of our essence
that is capable of knowing this essence, and as you have noticed i have
also defined pure morality as happiness, and i have said
that pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness,
i mean that those ideals of justice and happiness and purity and
beauty have been attained by the noumenal world and our thoughts and
this has allowed us to be guided better and this is the light that
attracts us towards a better world, so we must respect it and fight for
it with wisdom.
I have also said about the guidance of morality this:
And how can we be more civilized ?
I have done philosophy..
We have to measure it easily to know about it..
Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the
weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us
to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure civilization.
This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.
So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.
The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..
If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
cause extremism and violence and desorder too.
Second, there is a priori pure moral that we infer from reason.
Third, there is empirical moral, and here is what i have said about it:
About morality..
You will say that morality is morality, we can know it also by feeling it..
But applying morality must be dealt with with wisdom and rationality and logic..
What says philosophy(read the philosopher Kant) ? that morality is a composition of a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
So the action of knowing morality by feeling it, is not sufficient,
because it's necessary to infer and apply empirical moral, but is it a corruption of morality ? since laws are also morality and science
is also morality because we are ruled by optimization of science also,
this is a serious subject, and you are in front of the very important
part of morality that is empirical moral, because morality must be
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)