• What is the essence of democracy ?

    From Intelli2@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 12:31:29 2018
    Hello..


    What is the essence of democracy ?

    This is a good subject of philosophy..

    And i have to use rationality and some knowledge to answer it and
    to know and comprehend it.

    I think the essence of democracy comes from the essence of humanity
    that is perfection, because our past was full of defectuosities or flaws
    and inferiorities and it was full of corruption, so we have tried to
    transcend our living conditions with democracy because the process of
    democracy is like darwinism , because democracy present to us, we
    people, different actors and we have to choose the best among them, but democracy is a broader concept that include as a necessity to be more successful the presence of a good media and a good knowledge that help
    us to optimize best our choice among the actors of democracy, also
    democracy of today is tuned in such a way that it is founded on the
    presence of better quality tools that enhance its efficiency and that is
    in accordance with efficient morality, but do we have to be pessimistic
    about democracy ?
    i don't think so, because democracy is better constrained by tools that
    enhance better its quality, but we have to be careful and to adhere
    to the way of thinking of efficient morality that i have defined as
    Performance and reliability.

    What is the essence of craziness and foolishness ?

    We have to be smart to answer this question, and like in philosophy
    we have to be more rigorous..

    The essence of craziness and foolishness is related to the essence of laws..

    We are setting the laws, but who is setting the laws ?

    It is efficient morality that must set the laws, and efficient morality
    can not be craziness and inferiority of nazism, because being nazism is
    being crazy, because the essence of laws is the essence of efficient
    morality, and we can not necessarely authorize nazism or neo-nazism to
    govern, because of all my previous proofs, and you have noticed that i
    have defined craziness and foolishness that is related to corrruption of morality, here it is again:

    It is like when we are asking the questions of:

    What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ?

    I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality.

    How it can measure it?

    Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our
    universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you
    have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or
    universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to
    the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that
    knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality
    by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and
    reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level
    or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if
    the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that
    it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness.

    How can we measure the level and degree of quality ?

    It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is
    a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is
    more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more
    reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that
    measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way.

    I give you an example..

    If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more
    performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but
    they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this
    corruption of morality.

    Please read the rest of my final post:

    What is the essence of philosophy ?

    I will ask a question: Are you feeling my writing ?

    What are you feeling ?

    You will notice that i am abstracting to the essentials, and i am
    also knowing the essence of different things to be able to know
    and to comprehend, this is also the goal of philosophy, philosophy
    uses mostly "rationality" and some "knowledge" to be able to know and to comprehend like science. This is what we call philosophy.

    I have just corrected some of my typos, and here is my final corrected
    post about some of my views about my political philosophy:

    What is the essence of abstraction ?

    It is a good question in philosophy..

    I think the essence of abstraction is that we are also abstracting
    to be able to conceptualize, abstraction is abstracting to the
    essentials, it is like abstracting to the priorities, because also you
    have to prioritize to be able to succeed, for example i am a more
    serious programmer, and when you are doing the conception in computer programming, you are calling the process of abstraction to be able to conceptualize, and the process of abstraction do help us also to agree
    on the fondamentals of efficient morality to be able to transcend our
    living conditions, because what is also the goal of efficient morality
    today? it is also to abstract to the fondamentals or to the essentials
    that permit us to transcend nationalism, because we have to be frank
    that nationalism is not well tuned to be capable of governing the world,
    this is why you have to transcend with an efficient morality that is
    capable of governing our world, because our world needs it, because we
    have to be smarter than past ideologies and be capable to manage
    ourselves and manage and govern our world.

    About an important fact about the essence of communism

    You have to know more communism to talk about it, and to know
    communism you must know more philosophy and political philosophy,
    i mean that you have to be capable of thinking like in philosophy,
    but what is the essence of philosophy? what is the goal of philosophy ?
    the goal of real philosophy is like the goal of science, science is
    also to know and to comprehend about the essence of the parts of our intellectual world and empirical world, the goal of real philosophy is
    also to know and to comprehend, so it has the same essence as science..
    i mean you can not set the standard of quality of philosophy as just
    simply talking , i mean the standard of quality of philosophy must be
    much higher, this is why the goal of philosophy has to be also like
    science: to know and to comprehend ! so now ladies and gentlemen, what
    is the essence of communism? i think one of the most important
    charcteristic of communism is also that it has tried to transcend
    nationalism towards a better world, because nationalism is more inferior thinking that is not as capable as efficient morality
    to transcend our living conditions towards a better world, this is why efficient morality comes to the rescue and dictates to maximize
    performance and to maximize reliability, and to do so, you can not be
    inferior thinking of nazism that maximizes efficiency without taking
    into account correctly guidance of moral that is inherent to almost all
    of us and that doesn't take into account reliability correctly because
    it is too much violence that is too extreme in maximizing efficiency.

    Please read the rest to understand better my views on what must be
    efficient morality:

    Futility of nazism and neo-nazism..

    Nazism and neo-nazism are childish in that they want violently to
    maximize efficiency, this is the essence of nazism , it wants also
    to maximize efficiency even using violence, so we can not be confident
    with nazism and neo-nazism because they are like childish ideologies
    because they are not thought correctly.

    You have to know about efficient morality, i have said that efficient
    morality is performance and reliability, and morality is composed of
    a priori pure moral inferred from reason and empirical moral inferred
    from experience, but that's not so efficient because we have to include
    what i called "guidance of moral": like happiness and tolerance that is inherent to almost all of us, i think that this guidance of moral is a prerequisite to counter nazism and neo-nazism, because nazism says to
    maximize efficiency even with violence, but since guidance of moral that
    is inherent to us and a priori pure moral that takes into account
    reliability says that this act of nazism that maximize efficiency even
    with violence that it is an extremism that is too violent, because
    reliability sees this act of nazism as being too violent that causes
    violence, and guidance of moral that is inherent to almost all of us
    sees this act of nazism as being not acceptable , so nazism and
    neo-nazism is out of question and they are not accepted by efficient
    morality.


    Read the rest to understand more:

    The essence of Nazism..

    So what is the essence of Nazism ?

    When we become smart we have to find the shortest path to the solution,
    here it is:

    Nazism is also racism, but this racism of nazism is a violent racism
    that maximizes efficiency, and this racism that maximizes efficiency is
    a racism towards others that are not us, and it is a violent racism
    towards us, this is why nazism has tried to exterminate handicaped
    people, but you have to be careful with nazism because it tries also to exterminate the weak members to maximize efficiency, this is inherent to nazism, so imagine that we are attaining
    general artificial intelligence, so nazism can say by maximizing efficiency
    to exterminate humans that are not needed for a best efficiency,
    this is why nazism or neo-nazism is violent and dangerous.


    The essence of communism

    Communism has thought itself to be a correct morality, but that was the
    past, And this past has the characteristic of intellectual inferiority inherent to it, so all in all we have to be conscious about it and we
    have to be more responsability towards morality, am i a communist by
    saying so ? no, i want to be efficient morality, and efficient morality
    is a set that includes many disciplines such as politics, morality has
    to be defined more clearly and more precisely, if
    we define morality as being just the principles etc. and not including
    the application of those principles as a necessity, we are falling short
    and we are not defining morality correctly, because we have to enlarge
    our view of morality and it has to be defined as an efficient morality
    that knows how to govern and that knows best, and to know how to govern
    and to know best you have to set the standard of quality of morality
    at a higher level , and it is then now clear that a higher standard of
    morality has to include a higher level of quality of rationality and
    logical reasoning and has to include science and technical fields as a prerequisite to be able to make morality an efficient morality, so then
    can we call also this high level of quality such as science and
    technical fields as part of efficient morality? i think yes because
    applying efficient morality needs science and technical fields , so
    because it needs them, so science and technical fields are part of the
    set of efficient morality, and talking about efficient morality i have
    said the following:

    I have defined efficient morality as being: Performance and reliability.

    But is it a correct definition?

    Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so
    what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so
    if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not reliable, this
    is why i have said that efficient morality is Performance and reliability.

    Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

    I will get into political philosophy..

    Here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's related
    to the general morality..

    I will first remember you about my last writing about the essence
    of humanity:

    And what is the essence of humanity ?

    This is a good question in political philosophy.

    When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this
    question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path
    to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the
    question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it
    is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important ingredients ?

    I think the ingredients are:

    Perfection and Strongness.

    The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at
    the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are
    becoming more organized and less disorganized.


    This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.


    And this brings also hope.


    I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
    is perfection.

    Am i stupid to say that ?

    If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with "nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
    survive etc.

    So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the
    brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of
    nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence
    also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's "perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or
    what's in the brain of a human evolve from nothing to something better
    to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
    what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed
    and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we
    can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.

    Now here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's
    related to the general morality:

    Now i have explained that the essence of humanity is "Perfection" and
    also Strongness, and perfection and strongness is also the essence of a
    group, because we are also grouping together into different groups to be
    more perfection and more strong, but this essence of humanity that is Perfection and strongness
    must adhere to the general morality that must be an efficient morality,
    but if it is not in accordance with the general morality, we must
    enforce also general morality by laws, it is why we are managing our
    societies by laws.

    But what is also an efficient morality ?

    About the essence of communism

    You have not to fear communism, because empirical moral does constrain
    it, it is like a general mathematical proof, communism must adhere
    to optimization , because optimization is efficient morality, and
    efficient morality is Liberty, and corruption of morality must
    be measured by optimization itself that knows how to be optimization,
    communism is finally being more conscious of itself, because
    it is also more conscious of empirical moral.

    What is the essence of philosophy ?

    It is a very important question:

    So we have to be smartness to answer this question:

    Efficient morality is optimization and it is Liberty.

    Philosophy is a magical word , like Liberty.

    It is a generalization, it is like a general mathematical proof,
    this is the essence of philosophy, philosophy must be efficient
    morality, because it is a generalization, the word Philosophy is like
    the King, it must adhere to the act of optimization, and optimization
    is performance and reliability, now the essence of philosophy is more
    clear and it shows that the essence of Beauty and the essence of
    Happiness are the same , they are generalizations that must
    take into account the guidance of moral and a priori pure
    moral and empirical moral, and corruption of morality is measured
    by optimization, and optimization must be an effort , because
    Liberty is: discipline, progress and stableness, so the definition of
    Liberty that is discipline and progress and stableness is a soft way
    that ensure more the effort to realize this goal of Liberty, thus this
    has to be enforced by the hard way too, that means by laws.

    I have defined efficient morality as being performance and reliability
    that includes security, so beauty is part of reliability because
    reliability is the quality of performing consistently well, and to
    perform consistently well, you have to be beauty and you have to be
    social etc. please read my following political philosophy to understand
    better my thoughts:

    About the essence of optimization

    I have defined optimization as being:

    Performance and reliability.

    But can we clear more that ?

    Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the
    ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our
    other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that
    is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance.

    But if you define optimization like just being performance, that's
    a dangerous definition that lacks abstraction.

    Please read all the following to understand better:


    What is the essence of organization ?

    Those are the questions that we ask in courses of philosophy.

    Now i have to be smartness and rationality and logic to answer this
    question. Smartness is an important requirement that fulfill this
    goal.

    And you have to learn how to think Sir and Madam..

    So how can we attack this problem ?

    When you start thinking it is like also abstracting to the essentials to
    be able to simplify our thinking..

    So this process of abstraction needs also my smartness to decompose efficiently...

    Smartness is also a fast process that finds fast the shortest path to
    the solution or that finds the solution to the problem..

    So my smartness will answer like this:

    Look at our essence, we are a composition of consciousness and physical
    body..

    But we can try to say that we are guided by the process of survival of fittest..

    But this is not good abstraction..

    We have to be smartness..

    So why do we need to organize ?

    You will say that we have to be organized because of the process
    survival of the fittest..

    But this is a narrow view..

    Because it is a definition that is pejorative and not efficient..

    Because of the following question:

    Why we need to survive better ?

    It is because of our weaknesses.

    But i say that it is still not a correct answer , because
    it is too much abstraction that lacks efficiency.

    Because our weaknesses need to be organized by optimization.

    This is the magical word, it is optimization.

    Why do we optimize ? to be more powerful and more reliability and
    correctness.

    You will ask a question such as:

    Is optimization: reliability and correctness ?


    My answer:

    When you are not reliable and/or correctness you are less
    efficient, so efficiency is also reliability and correctness.

    This is why i have abstracted the essence of organization to the process
    of optimization.

    But that's lacking Abstraction.

    Because we have to look at the composition of optimization.

    Optimization is performance and reliability.

    So that the essence of organization is the composition of optimization
    that is performance and reliability.

    So the essence of optimization is not only performance , but it is
    reliability.

    And that's also efficient morality, and efficient morality is Liberty
    and Liberty is efficient morality.

    So now my answer is not finished:

    Because the optimization is constrained..

    Because corruption of morality is related to optimization..

    So how can we measure corruption of morality ?

    What is corruption of morality ?

    This is an interesting subject..

    It's like abstracting, you have to decompose and compose..

    You can say for example what are the causes of corruption of morality?

    You can say what is the consequences of corruption ?

    You can define efficiently morality to be able to know about corruption.

    So if you define morality you will define it as a composition of:

    Guidance of moral, and a priori pure moral and empirical moral.

    And now you see that the difficulty is how to set the reference to be
    able to measure corruption of morality with it.

    What is the reference of morality ?

    The reference must be optimization that knows how to be optimization.

    I mean that optimization can not set itself as being performance alone.

    And optimization can not set itself to be extreme justice that lacks optimization, like ignoring the optimization by the "heuristic" of
    "tolerance" that optimizes the economic system and the social system.

    And optimization must be an effort to maintain stableness and
    reliability of the system, that means reliability of the system, this is related to security, and security is also related to compassion and love
    and respect, because neglecting compassion , love and respect do cause extremism and violence that hurt the system.

    How optimization must be this effort ? because discipline and progress
    are inherent to Liberty, so you have to enforce them efficiently and
    wisely by the hard way, that means by laws and by the soft way
    that i talked about..

    So all in all the schema seems to be more clear and seems to indicate
    to us more what is corruption of morality, and it indicate to us
    what is the essence of organization..


    Getting more rational...

    Today i will ask a question of: what is love ?

    And the answer must be more rational.

    So we have to use smartness..

    Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening..

    If you say that there is still some suffering in your life..

    You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love.

    But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more
    than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to
    be part of good, and this good is part of love.

    So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the system..

    But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference
    is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering
    is not love.

    But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say
    that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part
    of love.

    So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of
    morality of the society is a good measure i think.

    It is like when we are asking the questions of:

    What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ?

    I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality.

    How it can measure it?

    Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our
    universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you
    have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or
    universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to
    the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that
    knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality
    by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and
    reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level
    or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if
    the level or degree of quality is lower and not tolerable, we say that
    it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness.

    How can we measure the level and degree of quality ?

    It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is
    a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is
    more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more
    reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that
    measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way.

    I give you an example..

    If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more
    performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but
    they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this
    corruption of morality.


    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)