Hello...

Read this:


More political philosophy..


I think it is a beautiful day, what do i mean by beautiful day?,
i am like a wise man type of person and i am able to notice it,
notice that Diversity has brought perfection, but you have to notice
more, so look at my following poem of Love to notice:


==========================

You're In My Heart

Like the long way from the start

That brings the beautiful "insight"

You're In My Heart

Like the beautiful light of the day and "night"

That makes us see in the dark

You're In My Heart

Because it is far from the evil fight

Because it is like the words of the almight

You're In My Heart

Because we are beautiful from the inside

Because our Love is right !

So I want to take you in my arms

Like peace and love that disarm

I want to take you in my arms

Since i am here to make it fine

I want to take you in my arms

Since love is also like a beautiful cup of wine

I want to take you in my arms

Since the light of my heart is making our love shines

I want to take you in my arms

Since our destiny is a beautiful valentine

=======================




So notice in my above poem of Love that i am saying:

"You're In My Heart
Like the beautiful light of the day and "night"
That makes us see in the dark"

So as you are noticing the day and night means also symbolically
the night of humanity, that means the bad of our humanity, and both
the day and night of humanity have allowed us also to see in the dark,
so you have to understand my poem of Love, this is the basis
of the principle of: the right Diversity gives perfection,
but you have to be more smart, today we are able to adapt
quickly to the bad of our humanity and be much more wisdom
because we are much more aware and much conscious and much more
educated because of the sophistication of education and the
sophistication of internet and such, this is why i think that
arab countries will adapt quickly, so i think that we have to be more optimistic about arabs and about our world.


Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:


More political philosophy about beautifulness..

I am like a wise man type of person, so i am a special person like
a wise man, and i am a gentleman type of person, so i am beautiful
from the inside, since you have also noticed that i wrote many
poems in front of you.. but today i will continu to speak
about an important subject and it is the one of beautifulness,
so i will begin it by ask the question of:


Is my rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction" beautiful or not ?


So here you will notice that you have to be a wise man to notice
that this rule is so important but it also brings much more beautifulness !

Since you can feel it by also noticing the following principle of: the
right Diversity brings perfection, and you can notice it in the
following video of a beautiful indian song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnCIjfkPooo

Look at how they are being beautiful like beautiful westerners,
since this diversity is becoming perfection ! and this is what is
bringing exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns, you
can feel more this important principle by my following writing:


Now i think there is something really important about the essence of
humanity, i think that it is "related" to morality, i said that morality
is perfection at best (read below my proof of it), and the goal to
attain is the goal of life that is to attain absolute perfection or
absolute happiness, so morality that is perfection at best is pushed
towards absolute perfection or absolute happiness, but we have to do
more philosophy to understand better the essence of human evolution, i
think that morality of past history has needed more "diversity" to be
able for humans to survive and to be more quality, and diversity has
given "immensity" or big "quantity", and you can notice it inside the
evolution of life, that life has needed a greater number of monkeys and
many tests and failures by evolution on them to evolve towards quality
and smartness and so that the monkey become human and smartness of
human. So as you are noticing "diversity" has given "immensity" or
"big" "quantity" and that both diversity and immensity or big quantity
have given quality and smartness(read below about the essence of
smartness to notice it). This is too how "morality" has evolved,
morality has needed diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to
be more perfection, this is why morality too of today is needing
diversity and immensity or big quantity so that to be perfection, and
morality of today knows that perfection of today is also having the
right "imperfections" (that are also diversity) to be
able to be the right perfection(read what i wrote about neo-nazism below
to notice it).

More political philosophy about tolerance..

I am like a "wise" man type of person, and i am a gentleman type of person..

Today i will do more political philosophy about tolerance,
i will start it by asking the following smart question:

What is this Statue of Liberty in USA and what is Liberty ?


You can be inferiority, and think that Liberty is just like being free
from constraints ! but a great philosopher knows Liberty comes with the
right constraints
so that to be the right Liberty that is the right morality , so here
again we notice that Liberty too is constrained by morality, because
morality is like the King, and now you are noticing more and more that
a great philosopher says that political philosophy must be a
transcendence with a sophisticated thinking ! and since i am like
a wise man, notice with me that the main point of Buddha is the Path of "Serenity" and "Insight", from this "Insight" you get more knowledge of yourself by more "hindsight" and more "introspection" that permits you
to guide your more savage instincts in the right direction, so here
again you notice that Buddha was right about this, but since i am
like a wise man, i will be more precise about the how to attain a
state of Serenity, so i will start it by giving an example of
mathematical logic:

(a -> b) AND (b -> c) gives (a -> c)

Note: the -> symbol is what we know as: logical implication.


This is a little "theorem", so from this theorem you will notice that
there is important requirements to be able to obtain the logical result
of (a -> c), and those "requirements" are from knowledge and smartness and consciousness that help us to understand what is the logical implication
of: (a -> b), i will not get into more details, but notice that to be
able to understand how do we get to the result, we have to understand
what is (a -> b), so now you are understanding the principle of a great philosopher that is that you have to think with sophistication so that
to understand what's Liberty or what is this or that, and now i will say
that from my important rule that i talked about previously that is: "The
effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction", is i think the
rule to attain serenity, because since you are maximizing at best
satisfaction by effort of being more perfection, so i think this brings
more "serenity", and i will say that this important rule of:
"The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction" looks by
logical analogy at the following principle that i talked about
previously that is the following:

In science there is very important principle that is:

There are appearances and there are realities, and there is the false
and there is the truth, so you have to know that in science we are "not" confident with the appearances , that means what you see may not be what
you get or what is truth , so now you are understanding the first
principle of science.

This is the same in political philosophy, political philosophy is also
like science, because in political philosophy we have not to be
confident with the appearances or with what we see, this is why you have
seen me in my previous post asking a question in political philosophy
such as: Is compassion and love inherent to efficiency ? and why am i
answering this question, it is because in political philosophy we are
not confident with the appearances or with what we see ! because we have
to get inside and understand the truth correctly so that also to know if
we are "safe" from something, it is also about safety !. So now you are noticing that in political philosophy, we have to be this first
principle of science that i just talked about above, and we have to be "efficiency" and we have to know if compassion and love are inherent to efficiency, i think this is my "abstraction" of what is political
philosophy.

And read the rest of my following thoughts of my political philosophy
to understand more:


More about: what is it to be a great philosopher ?

I said before the following:

======

What is it to be a great philosopher ?

I will try to answer this question:

I am like a wise man and i will make you feel more what is it
to be a great philosopher, so i will start it by asking a question:

Is human life not beautiful ?

If you are like thinking with your human instincts or with inferiority,
you will have the tendency to say that human life is not beautiful, but
if you are a great philosopher, you will say that it is by logical
analogy as answering the question of: what is decent morality? ,
so now you are feeling that a great philosopher is like
also the one that tries, like in mathematics, to find a generalization
or a logical proof that generalize ! so now you are feeling more
and more that a great philosopher is a sophisticated thinking !
this is why you have to look at how i am answering the question
below of: what is decent morality? and of: is human life beautiful?
so read my below political philosophy to understand more
about what is it to be a great philosopher:
======




You have to understand more what is a great philosopher,
now you will feel more and more that to answer this
question you have to be more smart ! so i will continu to
answer this question:

You have to understand that the main part of being a great philosopher
is that life is "not" perfect, so political philosophy knows that,
and a great philosopher knows that since life is all those imperfections
and weaknesses , so a great philosopher knows that
in this context of those weaknesses and imperfections, life can
become nihilism or life can become too much violence , so
a great philosopher will know that in this context he must be
a sophisticated thinking that transcend, this is why
you are feeling that to be able to answer the question of:
Is human life beautiful ? you have to be smartness, since
a great philosopher will say that if you answer this question
by simply saying that human life is not beautiful or that
this life is shit ! so this is like nihilism that is constrained
by morality , this is why i am answering below both questions of
is human life beautiful? and what is decent morality ? so
read my below political philosophy to understand better:

I am like a wise man and it is genetical in me..

You have to understand my political philosophy, i will explain it more:

When you see mathematics, mathematics is not about the feeling,
so mathematics can be less compassion if it decides to be too
much perfection, and this is also the main part of my philosophy,
how can we avoid extremism of perfection , this is why you
will feel in my writing that i am like a wise man type of person
that is a gentleman type of person when i am writing my political
philosophy, read it carefully again to notice it:

As you have noticed i am a white arab that is a gentleman
type of person, and i am also like a wise man type of person
and i am also a more serious software developer and
i am also an inventor who has invented many scalable
algorithms and there implementations, and you have also
noticed that i write poetry , and you have noticed that
i wrote many poems in front of you here and i posted
them here..

Now today i will do political philosophy about Pedagogy..

Can we ask the question of: What must be an efficient Pedagogy today?,
i think that we have to notice that the exponential progress
and the law of accelerating returns are influencing Pedagogy,
because today we have to be more efficient at learning,
because i think that the level of sophistication of today
is much more than the past and i think that this has
as a cause that we have to be much more sophisticated than
the past to be able to be efficient learning, i think that this is
the "first" requirement of today Pedagogy, and more than that
we have to define the other main parts of what is it to be efficient
learning, i mean what are the main parts of "efficient learning" that
have a great importance ? take for example choosing the right tools for learning , so the first question of how to choose the right tools for
learning is to know how to choose the right tools, not only that but to
be able for the tool to be the right tool, the learning of the right
tool must be made more "easier", now you are noticing
that the parts of efficient learning are becoming more clear,
this is why i said before in my political philosophy
the following that permits you to understand more what i am saying:

What is happening in my brain ?

I will speak more about me so that you understand my way of doing since
it is also like my philosophy, to be more smart you have to be capable
of reducing efficiently "complexity" so that to be efficient and so that
to be more successful, but how can you do it ? you have to be able
to know about the steps that guides you into the right direction,
first i will speak about my way so that you understand me better,
first step you have to be able to "prioritize" efficiently, because
to be able to be successful you have to prioritize, so look for example
at me, i have decided to "study" more and to study more "efficiently" so
that to be more successful, but this is not "sufficient" to know,
because to be able to be efficient at reducing complexity you have to be
able to be efficiently selective of your knowledge, and this efficiently
"selective" has to adhere in its turn to the process of being
efficient at reducing "complexity", so you have to be able to select "efficiently" "efficient" knowledge that is more "easy" to learn so that
to reduce complexity, thus you have to be able to ask "questions" to
this or that right persons to be able to be efficient at selecting your "knowledge", next step you have to be "tenacity" at studying efficiently
and you have to study more and more and you have to ask questions to
your professors and next step after you have been able to learn more and
more you have to be able at being efficient at "reusability" of your
efficient knowledge and this is a very important step , so don't neglect efficient "reusability" of your knowledge, this is also the steps that i
have followed and i have also used my "smartness" to be more efficient.


Read the rest of my thoughts of my political philosophy to learn more:


More political philosophy about life..


You will say that this life is not beautiful, but i don't agree
because this beautifulness is constrained by morality, so it is the same
as to how to measure decent morality (read below my political
philosophy about it) ! i am a more rational and more analytic
man, this is genetical in me, and this gives me a more technical
mind, this is why i say that morality also has to have a methodology,
but with more abstraction we have to notice that to be successful
you have to "prioritize" by giving weights of importance to this
or that ! and as you are noticing this process of prioritizing changes
our "perception" and/or "conception" ! so we have to ask in political philosophy the question of: what is so important for humans !
and now you are feeling that it is a process of prioritizing,
but you will say that the so important is money ! but this is not the
right conception ! because we can ask the question in political
philosophy of: Is money capable of guiding humanity in the right path or
way ? so now you are noticing that money has its weakness , so now we
are capable of seeing the advantage of my rule of: "The effort of being
more perfection brings satisfaction", and since it's the effort
of being perfection, so "smartness" takes a great weight of importance ,
so then beautifulness is constrained by morality that says that
smartness is so important, so now you are feeling that it is, by
logical analogy, like answering the question of what is a "decent"
morality (read below to see my answer), so now you are
understanding that human life becomes constrained since
smartness is so important, so this becomes that we can
say that life is this decent morality(read below of how to measure
decent morality) that is not that life it is not beautiful, so now i
think that there is no logical contradiction, and read my political
philosophy below to understand more:


Political philosophy about how to "measure" civilization..

I think from my thoughts below you are noticing that
statistically we can measure civilization by asking
a question of: "Do we have to be Peace of silence of death
or do you have to continu to live and go forward towards
more and more perfection..?", so now you are becoming more smart
by measuring it this way, this is why a right philosophy
is the one that wants to maximize at best satisfaction
so that to continu to live and go forward with more and more perfection,
this is the main engine that is the rule of: "The effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction" that maximize at best
satisfaction so that to be better than Peace of silence of death,
so i think that we have not to be pessimistic because
the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns are
enhancing and maximizing very very quickly our satisfaction, so then we
have to be more smart in our lives by knowing more
about the political philosophy, so read my following
thoughts to know more about my political philosophy:

More political philosophy about philosophy..


You have to understand more my philosophy, do you remember what i was
saying yesterday about "perfection", i said in my philosophy that my
following rule is very important: "The effort of being more perfection
brings satisfaction", but how can we say that more and more perfection
is "satisfaction" ? so i think from my own experience that more and more perfection makes you a better person and it is understandable that it is satisfaction, so now you have to notice that this satisfaction can not
be brought by the "Peace" of silence of death, it is as the satisfaction
that is brought by a beautiful Moroccan couscous that you eat that can
not be brought by Peace of silence of death, and notice that a beautiful Morrocan couscous that you eat is also brought by the rule of: "The
effort of being more perfection brings satisfaction", so a beautiful
Moroccan couscous that you eat also brings satisfaction that permits us
to go forward with more and more perfection, so now you are
understanding more my political philosophy below, this is why i said
yesterday in my political philosophy (read below) that this rule is one
of the best engine that we have that permits to push forward our
civilization towards more and more perfection towards absolute
perfection that is absolute happiness that is the goal of philosophy, so
now i think that the requirements of the right philosophy are seen more clearly, but how to avoid extremism of "perfection"? i think you have to understand what is morality, because since the goal
of philosophy is perfectionning at best to be able to attain absolute happiness, so we have to be careful about morality that has the same
goal as philosophy as i explained it in my political philosophy
previously, so how can we be careful? i think you have to read my
political philosophy below to understand better morality:


Today i will talk about capitalism and socialism..

So i have to do more political philosophy to understand better..


So when we talk capitalism we have to transcend and view "capitalism" as
a tool of "meritocracy" and "meritocracy" as a tool of "quality" and
quality as a tool of "perfection". so as you are understanding we have
to have the right quality so we have to have meritocracy and meritocracy
needs capitalism. So the question is not do we have to have meritocracy,
the question is what kind of meritocracy do we have to have, so read
my below writing to understand the kind of meritocracy that we need.

So now you are understanding more morality as i have defined it below,
that it is perfection at best (read my below proof of what is morality
to understand better), and now you are understanding that morality is
about "perfectionning" to attain the goal of absolute perfection or
absolute happiness, so morality is pushed forward towards absolute
perfection, but perfection at best is also constrained by democracy
to give "compassion" and "love" (read my below writing to understand
more), and we have to ask a question of: Is perfectionS of white
supremacism or neo-nazism the right perfections ? , i don't think
so because we have to understand the constraints to understand more,
so for example we have to know about what is smartness ? and here is
my answer:

And what is the essence of human smartness ?

This is a good subject of political philosophy..

So we have to be smarter to answer it correctly..

Individual human smartness is composed of genetical
smartness and cultural smartness..

But if you keep talking about individual smartness neglecting
the smartness of a group of humans, this is not correct.

But what is the smartness of a group of humans ?

It is composed of individual smartness , and the smartness
of the interaction of the group of humans, but this is not
a sufficient definition because it must be more understood,
because the smartness of the interaction of a group of people
is also the fact that we have to know that you can fail to solve the
problem because you have not found the right "path" that is more hidden
to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, and this makes
us understand that the smartest among us can fail at solving a problem
or inventing algorithms if he didn't find the correct path that is more "hidden" to smartness that leads to the solution of the problem , and
this is why we can say that a great number of people that are smart and
less smart can permit us to find the path that is more hidden to
smartness that leads to the solution of the problem, so this makes us understand that the smartness of a "group" of humans is also dependent
on less smart people that can find the right path that is hidden to
smartness that leads to the solution of the problem. This is why our
world needs arabs and needs white europeans and needs asians and needs
south americans etc. to be able to solve problems and to be able to
invent new things.


And what do i mean by morality is perfection at best ?

I said before the following:

"Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad
And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good
And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best
So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection
So that to be able to solve all our problems
And be absolute happiness that is the goal
But morality of today must at least be a decent morality
To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"


So as you are noticing that even if morality is a system of values and principles of conduct, we can ask what is the characteristics of this
system of values and principles of conduct? and we can notice that the
most important thing is not the writing of this system of values and
principles of conduct, but it is the characteristic of the writing of
this system of values and principles of conduct that is to perfect at
best, so i think my definition is logical.


So now that you are understanding my definition of morality, please
read my following thoughts to understand better:


About white supremacism and neo-nazism..

I am more capable at political philosophy, and i think i understand the "defect" of white supremacism and neo-nazism, it is about "morality",
and as i defined morality by two abstractions that are: Perfection at
best and with Efficiency and the correct compassion and love that is
inherent to efficiency (read more below to understand), so i think the
defect of white supremacism and neo-nazism, is that they want to be
white supremacism so they have the "tendency" like neo-nazism to be "radicalism" of "perfection" that is "too" violent with humans
imperfections (but notice that we can not be confident with there
violent behavior towards human imperfections), so they are like
ideologies of radicalism that are evil over this earth, because they are
not understanding the basis of our today civilization, our today
civilization is also more patience and more tolerance and our today civilization is more positive because it believes that science and
technology will soon be able to solve many of our problems because of
the exponential progress and the law of accelerating returns that are so
fast, so our today civilization is more positive and more confident, and
read what i wrote before about being civilized:

Now what is it to be civilized ?

This is a smart question..

You have to understand deeply our kind of civilization to
be able to answer this question, i think that our kind of civilization
is wanting to "maximize" at best by "effort" the avoidance of savagery
even if we are still savagery here and there, you have to be able able
to understand how to prioritize to be able to succeed ! i think that our
kind of civilization is giving a weight of great importance to the
fact of avoiding savagery at best by effort, so this principle doesn't contradict the fact that even if we are still savagery here and there
we have to maximize at best the avoidance of savagery by "effort", and
also this principle has to be in accordance with the fact that
we have to be the right "stability" to be able to
call a society a society or a country a country, so this is
why we are noticing that we are being a kind of "tolerance" and we
are a social system and we are a health care system in our kind of civilization. So to be in accordance with the principle above you are understanding that we have to be efficient and much organized to be able
to be this principle in action, this is why i am
not in accordance with neo-nazism or white supremacism,
because they are inferiority of morality that doesn't
understand the requirements of our today "civilization",
so white supremacists and neo-nazis have to adapt because
they are too much violence.


Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


Yet about meritocracy and elitism..


I wrote previously the following:

"More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy..
The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because
we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy.
But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what
kind of meritocracy do we have to have ?
Because as you are noticing that i said below:
"You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean
that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and
has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism""


And to be more "smart" look "carefully" at my following poem that i
wrote previously that talks about the above problem:


===

Look at the more "individual" perfection

It can become an imperfection

Since more "awareness" of imperfections that is more individual perfection

Can make us hate and discriminate our imperfections

And since we are many of us made also of imperfections

So this can make "us" more disorganized and less perfection

And that's an "important" problem that needs an "attention"

So this is why morality is calling for "actions"

This is why laws are our security and a right prevention

And this weakness must become a beautiful ascension

So you have to see it better in many more dimensions !

Since it is like running away from the pain of detention !

So as you see there is no pretension

So hope that there is no incomprehension !


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

====


Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand better:


More political philosophy about Elitism and Meritocracy..

The question is not do we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy, because
we have to have Elitism and Meritocracy.

But the question is: "what" kind of Elitism do we have to have and "what
kind of meritocracy do we have to have ?

Because as you are noticing that i said below:

"You have to distinguish between this Elitism and that Elitism , i mean
that there is not correct Elitism that hates inferiority of people and
has the tendency to not get along with people, but i am not this Elitism"

So you are noticing more what kind of Elitism and Meritocracy we have to be.

So you have to be careful with the kind of Elitism and Meritocracy that
we want to have.

And you have to know how to navigate efficiently like a "pro", this is
why you have to get into "realtime" and "dynamic" calculations to get
better at efficiency, being correct professionalism
needs from us to take responsability very "seriously", so you have
to avoid to be lazy , because it is a work of everyday, look for example
at how we are being synchronized much more efficiently etc. so you are
noticing that our today lives are synchronized much more efficiently and
our today lives needs to be much more "efficient" because today life
needs from us to be much more smart and much more efficient than our
past history, so as you are noticing that it is like our today is based
on much more efficiency than past history and this doesn't contradict my following thoughts of my political philosophy, so read it again:

More political philosophy about order..


I think you are understanding me more, but you are feeling more and more
that i am also an Elitist, but you have to distinguish between this
Elitism and that Elitism , i mean that there is not correct Elitism
that hates inferiority of people and has the tendency to not get along
with people, but i am not this Elitism, i am a proactive Elitism that
talks to the people and that understand the living conditions of people,
and that wants people to be "efficiency", and to be able to be
efficiency you have to know how to be order, order is also following the
rule of: People needs efficiency ! so order has to know how to follow
rules of efficiency ! this is what i am talking about in my political philosophy: is how to be efficiency ! this is why you have also
seen me talking in my political philosophy about what is morality and
what is efficiency and is compassion and love inherent to efficiency
(but notice that efficiency here is about humans that are efficient and
that governs), so you have to understand me more, this is why you have
to read my following thoughts of my political philosophy:


About love and order..

As you are noticing i am "playing" with words when i am doing political philosophy, for example i am saying that i have defined morality
by two abstractions that are: "Perfection at best" and with
Efficiency and compassion and love that are inherent to efficiency.


But you will ask the following question:

Is it logical to say that compassion and love are inherent to efficiency ?


You have to understand political philosophy, when i say love in
political philosophy , love must "satisfy" "order", and order is
primordial ! but what is order ? In political philosophy, order is
a maximization at best of order ! so now you are understanding
that there is no logical contradiction in my writing, this is
why you are noticing that i am saying below the following:

===

Is compassion or love inherent to efficiency ?


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)