• More precision about my philosophy..

    From Sky89@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 18 16:44:39 2018
    Hello..

    Read this:


    More precision about my philosophy..

    In philosophy we have to define correctly what is a "reification"..

    And if you have noticed i am also "logical" by considering the fact
    that it a thing "exists" in the "real" world as being a "reification",
    this is why you have to read all my thoughts bellow to understand more:

    I am a white arab..

    Yet more philosophy and political philosophy..

    What is the essence of an idea ?

    I need a more correct abstraction..

    So how can we start to solve by thinking ?

    Let us look for example at its characteristic..

    If we look at its platonism, its reification of the future or past or
    present experience is a platonism that can be considered a
    characteristic of an idea that can be considered a special
    characteristic that makes the idea not considered getting old ! this is
    why the idea is really special, and does an idea is material or
    immaterial ? i think the immaterial part of an idea exists, because
    it reifies a future or past or present experience ! so like
    empiricism or rationalism, you have to be both rationalism
    and empiricism to be able to be correct morality or correct
    thinking ! i think the idea is composed of an immaterial and a
    material ! and the proof is that ideas can reify
    the experience of the future and that doesn't yet exist(please read
    bellow my thoughts as a proof) ! or ideas can be immaterial of a concept
    that doesn't yet exist ! so i am not in accordance with the philosopher
    Plato that have said that an idea is just an idea that is immaterial,
    and also i say that an idea is like more light weight because i think
    ideas can be perfected faster(so better) and better than physical world
    because ideas has less "constrains" than the physical world. Read the
    rest of my thoughts to understand better my philosophy:

    Can we travel back in time?

    Here is my thoughts:

    It is a very interesting question that demands rationality
    and logical thinking to answer it ...

    To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the
    mathematical arithmetic series.

    An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that
    the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum
    gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have
    to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the
    final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much
    bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n
    + 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the
    arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding
    the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the
    future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n
    * (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to
    time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the
    time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n *
    (a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the
    arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n
    + 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately
    it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something extra-ordinary in itself.

    Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question:

    Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car
    is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to
    the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive
    faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the
    future time in which one arrives by the feet?

    I answer this in a more logical way:

    Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation
    of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine
    that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that
    also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper
    without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result
    that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes
    to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2),
    it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet
    invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future, therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive characteristic.

    So there is no contradiction and therefore we can
    consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like
    the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions
    as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series.

    Here is one of my conclusion:

    If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris
    by airplane, and that another person swims and walk
    by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming
    and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions,
    And if you travel to Paris by plane and you
    answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris
    more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that
    has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the
    arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able
    to send an email quickly to the person who wants to
    to swim and walk to Paris and give him
    the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see
    the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic
    can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future,
    so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to
    travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other
    mathematical inventions and others...


    Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic,
    so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into account the scientific and empirical evidence to
    be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the
    future..

    If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice
    of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his
    life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows
    him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person
    will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person
    will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person
    which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice ,
    and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second
    person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same
    event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we
    must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and
    notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE
    The future of the second person and will also live the future event of
    the second person, then those two theoretical and
    empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future
    event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the
    future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy
    logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact
    that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second
    person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our
    way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if
    it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation
    as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future
    will lead to the same certainty, and as a result
    the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation
    that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel
    in the future.

    Then you understand that I am also a Platonist,
    Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as
    a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time
    machine that permits to travel in the future, you understand that it
    makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine
    that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold
    on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two
    persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable
    advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future.

    When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the
    circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof
    that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is
    reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence.
    So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because
    we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher
    Plato.

    It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea
    by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to
    call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the future.

    Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists,
    then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation
    by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a
    time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that
    valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the
    future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because
    the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in
    fuzzy logic.




    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)