• I correct a typo, please read again

    From Sky89@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 16 19:07:30 2018
    Hello..

    Read this:


    I correct a typo, please read again:

    How to be perfection of morality ?

    As you have noticed i have defined much more what is morality,
    I said also that morality is continueous perfection, but
    how to be this perfection? i think there is microcalculations
    of morality and there is macrocalculations of morality , so to know more
    about how to be perfection of morality we have to be also
    empiricism and take into account the constrains and the realities,
    so i think that politics today must be a more balanced politics
    that is "security" and that also is economy that is also security
    but i am saying it to be more correct abstraction, and politics
    must be also social, so i think that a more apt politics
    is a politics of "centrism", here it is:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrism


    Read the rest:

    How to be positive and not pessimism ?

    You have to know about philosophy to answer better this question:

    I think we have to know the essence of morality, and as you have
    noticed i have defined "morality" as being contineous perfection
    that is possible towards absolute perfection, this is like philosophy
    that i am doing , and morality is what gives us politics and laws etc.
    so morality is a very serious subject, why morality is contineous
    perfection ? because the essence of perfection is "solving" problems,
    and "reliability" too has an essence solving problems, because i think
    we are reliable if we solve problems, and reliability, like perfection,
    also has as essence that is "measured" by our need to solve completely
    our problems to be able to be absolute perfection, so the essence of
    morality is to be "responsability" that needs to solve our problems,
    also the essence of morality that is the essence of perfection is
    also perfection that knows that extremism that is
    too problematic is bad, so extremism is constrained by morality that
    means by perfection, other than that we have to not only be rationalism
    but be also empiricism to be more correct thinking, so "empiricism"
    dictates that morality is also beautiful, because perfection of today is
    also a hard sacrifice of scientists and engineers that wants
    to brings the best to humanity and wants to help humanity as a whole,
    so we have not be pessimistic about morality.

    Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better my thoughts:

    About the wisdom of my poems..

    You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy,
    also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am
    in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" !
    so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have
    posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you
    more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that
    this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow
    it get "out" from "idealism" without getting into
    pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism
    of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that
    they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what
    is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow
    that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving"
    problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we
    can solve problems, and if we are capable of solving all the problems
    we say that we are absolute perfection or complete reliability, so
    morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice
    with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also
    "diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering,
    and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and
    weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:

    "But the weak becomes better
    Because our civilization is not a decoy"

    So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting
    out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have
    said the following on one of my previous post:


    My wisdom of today..

    A better politics..

    Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an
    important wisdom:

    One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:

    Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
    pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.

    My other wisdom of today is:

    A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
    and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.


    This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:

    Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom"
    is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being
    discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication
    of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows
    how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.

    This wisdom looks like my above one that says:

    A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
    and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.

    So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.



    So here is my poem and read it again:

    Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be
    smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read
    my explanation of it bellow:


    We are past and present

    Because time is like a balance

    Because time is perfection

    Because perfection is the scale

    But how perfection can be only light ?

    Perfection is also darkness

    Because we are strong and weak

    Even silence is strong and weak

    Eventhough silence is divine

    Because even love is effervescence

    Bees know about time

    That time is relativity

    And relativity is diversity

    But what is perfection?

    Perfection is also diversity

    Diversity is also immensity

    Because time is relativity

    The weak needs the strong

    And the strong needs the weak

    But the weak becomes better

    Because our civilization is not a decoy

    Since diversity is the seed

    Since the scale creates consciousness

    Because the scale creates abundance

    Since diversity is also seasons

    Who creates wisdom and reason

    So hello to you my dear and beautiful

    With your lovely pretty eyes

    You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow

    To drive us to a beautiful island

    Like our love and tenderness

    Rather for goods never I leave you!

    My sweet and beautiful goddess

    My sweet spring and my sweet princess

    Our hearts finally beat in unison

    Like a nice thrill and a nice song

    I do not want to hurt you

    Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!

    As if both of us were as one

    Let's be the flower and the perfum!

    And may infinity and depth bring us together

    Since our destiny is infinite

    Since our destiny has understood

    That the pretty fir is not cursed

    Because Christmas is divine

    As silence is a pretty parfum

    Because in the depth of your pretty eyes

    Who reminds me of our beautiful raft

    Who defies storms and seasons

    Since life is not a gift

    And because destiny and reason are our passion

    Because beauty reminds us

    That she can not be violence and hatred

    Since relativity of time is like a mason

    Since the weather is seasons that brings reason

    So, hello to you man of reason!


    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    ===


    First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism
    alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so
    you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and
    to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because
    my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have
    to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:

    When i say in my poem the following:

    "We are past and present
    Because time is like a balance"

    When i say we are past and present it must be measured by
    my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem
    is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is
    both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and
    not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering
    and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from
    the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the
    meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"

    And now about the following part of my poem:

    "Because time is like a balance"

    I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need
    the causes, this is why time is like a balance.


    And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:

    "Because time is perfection
    Because perfection is the scale"


    Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning,
    it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand
    the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism
    and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand
    by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the
    Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection,
    and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is
    perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that
    means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it
    is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has
    balanced more to be perfection.

    Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

    "But how perfection can be only light ?
    Perfection is also darkness"


    I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it
    in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering,
    this is why it is also "darkness".

    Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

    "Because we are strong and weak
    Even silence is strong and weak
    Eventhough silence is divine"


    I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so
    complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of
    paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very
    "strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have
    difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the
    reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex
    objects.

    Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

    "And relativity is diversity"

    You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
    i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
    experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".

    Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

    "Perfection is also diversity
    Diversity is also immensity
    Because time is relativity"

    Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
    i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
    experience we can say the above.

    And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.

    Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

    What has to be politics ?

    I said about morality that:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.

    Read for example this:

    "Now, an even greater threat is coming. Forrester predicts that by 2025, technologies like robots, artificial intelligence (AI), machine
    learning, and automation will replace 7% (or 22.7 million) jobs in the
    US alone."

    https://www.atlassian.com/it-unplugged/best-practices-and-trends/automation-and-ai-are-coming-for-it-jobs-here-s-how-to-keep-yours

    So what about this problem ?

    Since i said that the essence of perfection is the essence of
    "reliability", there essence is that they solves problems,
    and since perfection today is a hard sacrifice of for example scientists
    and engineers that wants to do there best to help humanity, and since
    progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential
    progress, not a linear progress, and don't forget too about the law of accelerating returns that, so i think that in about 15 years or
    20 years(and that's a near future) science and technology will be so
    powerful that that it will be necessary for us humans to be united
    over this earth, so in this near future we have to rethink politics,
    so we have not to waste our time with inferior thinking of neo-nazism or nationalism.


    Read the rest of my thoughts:

    Politics is also like playing chess, you have to be smart to be
    able to succeed, but politics is constrained by "perfection",
    and as you have noticed it is also like philosophy that i am doing, but
    this perfection must be perfection that knows how to "drive", so how
    must we drive ? i think we have to find the "best" possible way that
    guides us towards our goals, so i was thinking more and i think
    that we have to cease to be inferior "thinking" of neo-nazism
    or nationalism because it is archaism as i have explained,
    so what is the right way then ? i think a necessary requirement
    in politics is to do politics knowing in advance that science
    and technology are in many parts advancing exponentially, not linearly,
    and that also we have to be aware of the law of accelerating returns,
    because of that, in about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
    will be able of enhancing our genetics and make us more smart
    and more beautiful and more strong, and in about 15 years or 20 years we
    will be capable of doing much more than that, so this is why politics
    must be aware of this exponential progress of science and
    technology(please read more about it on internet), and this is why
    politics must not be neo-nazism or nationalism and it must be more
    responsable and politics must think differently our world , because in
    about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
    will be really really powerful that we must rethink our world in this
    near future, because in about 15 years or 20 years we have to cease to
    think like racial nationalism that is inferior thinking, because in
    about 15 years or 20 years science and technology will be really really powerful that we have to become more united because this science and
    technology of the near future will permit us to solve much much better
    our world problems.

    Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

    Is morality tolerance and compassion ?

    You have to be smart because it is like philosophy..

    As i said morality that:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
    mathematics that i am doing.


    So i think compassion and tolerance is inherent to perfection,
    because perfection is also a hard "sacrifice" to help the people of
    humanity, and also because the reality proves that perfection is doing
    its best to help humanity, we can notice it by the behavior of
    scientists and engineers and even by the behavior of Google and DeepMind
    and other high tech companies and such , because they are more
    responsable of the well being of humanity as a whole, and this proves
    the "theory" of my definition of morality because perfection is also a
    hard hard "sacrifice" to help people of humanity, this is why morality
    is also "beautiful", so you have not to be pessimistic
    because also progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential progress and in about 15 year or 20 years technology
    and science will be really really powerful and we will
    be able to do really great things such as enhancing our genetics
    and become more beautiful and more smart and more strong
    and we will be capable of doing much more than that ! so don't
    waste your time with neo-nazism or nationalism..


    This is why i said before the following , read the rest of my thoughts
    to understand better my thoughts:

    Is morality beautiful ?

    That's a really an interesting an important question:

    I said that morality is:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
    mathematics that i am doing.


    So i think morality is also beautiful because the hard sacrifice to
    bring perfection is done by for example scientists and engineers , and
    the essence of perfection is the same as the essence of reliability,
    because there essence is the fact that they solves problems so
    they perfect us, so for example scientists and engineers are doing
    there best to bring the best to our humanity and to help humanity, so we
    have to "honor" there sacrifice , Google and DeepMind are also doing a
    great sacrifice to bring the best to humanity and to help humanity ,
    this "perfection" is the essence of morality and it is morality that
    they are doing , there sacrifice is great ! so i am not pessimistic
    because i believe in morality that brings perfection that helps humanity
    like is helping us Google and DeepMind that wants to be in accordance
    with morality. And beautifulness of Google and DeepMind is like my
    following beautiful poem that i invite you to read:


    I am strong like patience

    I am passionate like romance

    I am right as the nuance!

    I am compassionate as hope

    It's like flowers and bees bringing honey

    As our life is made of light and Rainbow

    I am like love, joy and smiles

    Who are also like diamond and sapphire

    Who are also like Satin and Velvet

    Since it's like the Elixir of love

    Since our love is divine

    As dawn is beautiful and comes back

    With its sky and its stars and its divine silence

    Who plunges us into the secrets of our beautiful garden

    Like your emerald, ruby, sapphire and diamond eyes

    We are sun and heat like lovers

    Your soul is a sea of pretty perfumes

    Where love and hope are intertwined

    Like flowers and bees

    Like the taste of honey

    You are like the beauty of dawn that comes back

    And who bathes me in the depths of our destiny

    Of our love which is divine



    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --


    And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


    About the essence of nazism and neo-nazism

    Neo-nazism and nazism is not only national socialism
    but it is also racism inside its group and outside its group,
    it is racism inside its group of white europeans because
    nazism and neo-nazism wants to "perfect" the white european race,
    it is why we say that nazism and neo-nazism are idealism of
    socialism that is a failure as i have explained(read bellow),
    and nazism and neo-nazism are "idealism" of racism, because
    it's too much idealism that wants to "perfect" without taking into
    account the constrains of the realities, so neo-nazism
    and nazism are not pragmatic or realistic, neo-nazism and nazism is what
    we call too much "perfection" that is not correct morality, and you can
    easily notice it when neo-nazism says that all arabs are bad or
    all Israel is bad, without recognizing that it is not
    truth and that it is illogical because not all Israel is bad
    and not all arabs are bad, so we have not to waste our
    time with this idealism of neo-nazism and nazism.

    Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:

    About the essence of perfection..

    What is the essence of perfection ?

    Because i explained and defined morality as:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
    mathematics that i am doing.

    The essence of perfection needs a "reference" of measure, so we have to
    think about the reference of measure of perfection and defined it more correctly, first you have to recognize that i am speaking about
    perfection as general related to the definition of morality,
    so i think that the reference of measure of perfection is like
    the reference of measure of "reliability", because i think
    you are "reliable" if you solve problems, perfection is the same
    because you are perfection when you solve problems, and when you
    are capable of solving "all" the problems we say that you are
    absolute perfection.

    To be more convinced by my writings, look at France and its
    Liberty, equality and fraternity that is the national motto of France
    and the Republic of Haiti, and is an example of a tripartite motto.
    Although it finds its origins in the French Revolution, it was then only
    one motto among others and was not institutionalized until the Third
    Republic at the end of the 19th century.It is also the motto of the
    Grand Orient de France and the Grande Loge de France.

    Read more here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libert%C3%A9,_%C3%A9galit%C3%A9,_fraternit%C3%A9


    This Liberty, equality and fraternity of France is too much "idealism",
    like the idealism of socialism, so it is not pragmatic because it is not realistic. USA is more like Liberty like the statue of Liberty in USA ,
    and Liberty is Morality and Morality is contineous perfection that is
    possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is
    possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
    inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics that i am doing.

    Read the rest:

    What is the essence of Liberty ?

    If i ask you a question:

    Is idealism a morality ?

    If you are smart you will immediatly recognize that idealism
    like idealism of socialism is like belonging to the set of
    solving the problem "locally", it doesn't belong to the "set"
    of solving the problems globally, it is as it is not a "general"
    theorem in mathematics, idealism is as in artificial intelligence
    you are blocking in a local minimum and you are not able to
    go to the global minimum that we require in artificial intelligence
    such as Deep learning in artifical intelligence, so from those analogies
    you will be able to understand that idealism of socialism
    is not "reliability", because more scientifically i
    have defined reliability as being:

    What is the essence of reliability ?

    What is reliability ?

    We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
    "reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
    also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
    and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
    a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
    able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
    perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
    say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
    "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
    "extremism" that is too violent. So it
    is like mathematics.

    What is corruption of morality ?

    How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?

    First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
    so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you
    don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.

    So you are able now to understand that idealism or more idealism of
    socialism is not reliability , so it is not the right perfection that
    solves problems , so it is not Morality that is contineous perfection
    that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that
    is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
    violent.

    So now you are more capable of seeing what is Liberty, Liberty is
    also Morality, because you can not be Liberty if you are not Morality
    that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
    perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.


    Read the rest:


    About morality...

    I have explained that:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
    mathematics that i am doing.

    This is a serious subject, because morality is what gives us
    politics and laws etc. so we have to take it seriously, but you will
    have the tendency, like idealism of socialism, to say that what i am
    doing is like "mathematics" or like "logic" or like "optimization", so
    you will ask a question: where is compassion and where is love and where
    is tolerance in my definition of morality, i will answer that it is
    the essence of morality , because i have made you understand what is
    morality, and i have made you understand that "extremism" is constrained
    by morality , so morality says to extremism that it is "bad", this is
    also what gives tolerance and compassion and love, but if you ask a
    question such as: Is morality safe ? it is as you are asking a question
    such as: are we today "completely" safe from "diseases"? because you
    know for sure that we are still not completely safe from diseases, this
    is the same for morality, because you have to be smart and know that
    morality is also constrained by economy and other factors.

    And here is what i said about idealism to be able for you to understand
    more life:

    One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:

    "Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
    pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence."

    I want to comment on it more:

    I said before that:

    "Socialism comes from weakness and insecurity and it wants to have
    "compassion" on its people that are more weak and more insecure , but
    its idealism comes from the fact that compassion is put as a "high"
    priority that bring socialism , but at the same time optimization and efficiency of economy and the system is "postponed" again and again in
    favor of compassion of the social side. And the idealism of those acts
    of socialism is the fact that socialism is thinking "love" and
    compassion , but it is not being "pragmatism" and "responsability" of efficiency and optimization like in UK."


    So socialism is also too much idealism, but if socialism says that
    "its" compassion is morality, this "kind" of compassion of socialism
    belongs to the "set" of "locally" solving the problem, it doesn't belong
    to the "set" of globally solving the problem in the system, so
    we can not call it "reliability" that is also the right "perfection"
    that solves problems and we can not call it Morality that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
    say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
    "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids
    "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics that i am
    doing , because it is more rigor of logic.



    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)