Hello,

Read this:

Read again, i correct a typo

What has to be politics ?

I said about morality that:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.

Read for example this:

"Now, an even greater threat is coming. Forrester predicts that by 2025, technologies like robots, artificial intelligence (AI), machine
learning, and automation will replace 7% (or 22.7 million) jobs in the
US alone."

https://www.atlassian.com/it-unplugged/best-practices-and-trends/automation-and-ai-are-coming-for-it-jobs-here-s-how-to-keep-yours

So what about this problem ?

Since i said that the essence of perfection is the essence of
"reliability", there essence is that they solves problems,
and since perfection today is a hard sacrifice of for example scientists
and engineers that wants to do there best to help humanity, and since
progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential
progress, not a linear progress, and don't forget too about the law of accelerating returns, so i think that in about 15 years or
20 years(and that's a near future) science and technology will be so
powerful that it will be necessary for us humans to be united
over this earth, so in this near future we have to rethink politics,
so we have not to waste our time with inferior thinking of neo-nazism or nationalism.


Read the rest of my thoughts:

Politics is also like playing chess, you have to be smart to be
able to succeed, but politics is constrained by "perfection",
and as you have noticed it is also like philosophy that i am doing, but
this perfection must be perfection that knows how to "drive", so how
must we drive ? i think we have to find the "best" possible way that
guides us towards our goals, so i was thinking more and i think
that we have to cease to be inferior "thinking" of neo-nazism
or nationalism because it is archaism as i have explained,
so what is the right way then ? i think a necessary requirement
in politics is to do politics knowing in advance that science
and technology are in many parts advancing exponentially, not linearly,
and that also we have to be aware of the law of accelerating returns,
because of that, in about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be able of enhancing our genetics and make us more smart
and more beautiful and more strong, and in about 15 years or 20 years we
will be capable of doing much more than that, so this is why politics
must be aware of this exponential progress of science and
technology(please read more about it on internet), and this is why
politics must not be neo-nazism or nationalism and it must be more
responsable and politics must think differently our world , because in
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be really really powerful that we must rethink our world in this
near future, because in about 15 years or 20 years we have to cease to
think like racial nationalism that is inferior thinking, because in
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology will be really really powerful that we have to become more united because this science and
technology of the near future will permit us to solve much much better
our world problems.

Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

Is morality tolerance and compassion ?

You have to be smart because it is like philosophy..

As i said morality that:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.


So i think compassion and tolerance is inherent to perfection,
because perfection is also a hard "sacrifice" to help the people of
humanity, and also because the reality proves that perfection is doing
its best to help humanity, we can notice it by the behavior of
scientists and engineers and even by the behavior of Google and DeepMind
and other high tech companies and such , because they are more
responsable of the well being of humanity as a whole, and this proves
the "theory" of my definition of morality because perfection is also a
hard hard "sacrifice" to help people of humanity, this is why morality
is also "beautiful", so you have not to be pessimistic
because also progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential progress and in about 15 year or 20 years technology
and science will be really really powerful and we will
be able to do really great things such as enhancing our genetics
and become more beautiful and more smart and more strong
and we will be capable of doing much more than that ! so don't
waste your time with neo-nazism or nationalism..


This is why i said before the following , read the rest of my thoughts
to understand better my thoughts:

Is morality beautiful ?

That's a really an interesting an important question:

I said that morality is:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.


So i think morality is also beautiful because the hard sacrifice to
bring perfection is done by for example scientists and engineers , and
the essence of perfection is the same as the essence of reliability,
because there essence is the fact that they solves problems so
they perfect us, so for example scientists and engineers are doing
there best to bring the best to our humanity and to help humanity, so we
have to "honor" there sacrifice , Google and DeepMind are also doing a
great sacrifice to bring the best to humanity and to help humanity ,
this "perfection" is the essence of morality and it is morality that
they are doing , there sacrifice is great ! so i am not pessimistic
because i believe in morality that brings perfection that helps humanity
like is helping us Google and DeepMind that wants to be in accordance
with morality. And beautifulness of Google and DeepMind is like my
following beautiful poem that i invite you to read:


I am strong like patience

I am passionate like romance

I am right as the nuance!

I am compassionate as hope

It's like flowers and bees bringing honey

As our life is made of light and Rainbow

I am like love, joy and smiles

Who are also like diamond and sapphire

Who are also like Satin and Velvet

Since it's like the Elixir of love

Since our love is divine

As dawn is beautiful and comes back

With its sky and its stars and its divine silence

Who plunges us into the secrets of our beautiful garden

Like your emerald, ruby, sapphire and diamond eyes

We are sun and heat like lovers

Your soul is a sea of pretty perfumes

Where love and hope are intertwined

Like flowers and bees

Like the taste of honey

You are like the beauty of dawn that comes back

And who bathes me in the depths of our destiny

Of our love which is divine



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--


And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


About the essence of nazism and neo-nazism

Neo-nazism and nazism is not only national socialism
but it is also racism inside its group and outside its group,
it is racism inside its group of white europeans because
nazism and neo-nazism wants to "perfect" the white european race,
it is why we say that nazism and neo-nazism are idealism of
socialism that is a failure as i have explained(read bellow),
and nazism and neo-nazism are "idealism" of racism, because
it's too much idealism that wants to "perfect" without taking into
account the constrains of the realities, so neo-nazism
and nazism are not pragmatic or realistic, neo-nazism and nazism is what
we call too much "perfection" that is not correct morality, and you can
easily notice it when neo-nazism says that all arabs are bad or
all Israel is bad, without recognizing that it is not
truth and that it is illogical because not all Israel is bad
and not all arabs are bad, so we have not to waste our
time with this idealism of neo-nazism and nazism.

Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:

About the essence of perfection..

What is the essence of perfection ?

Because i explained and defined morality as:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.

The essence of perfection needs a "reference" of measure, so we have to
think about the reference of measure of perfection and defined it more correctly, first you have to recognize that i am speaking about
perfection as general related to the definition of morality,
so i think that the reference of measure of perfection is like
the reference of measure of "reliability", because i think
you are "reliable" if you solve problems, perfection is the same
because you are perfection when you solve problems, and when you
are capable of solving "all" the problems we say that you are
absolute perfection.

To be more convinced by my writings, look at France and its
Liberty, equality and fraternity that is the national motto of France
and the Republic of Haiti, and is an example of a tripartite motto.
Although it finds its origins in the French Revolution, it was then only
one motto among others and was not institutionalized until the Third
Republic at the end of the 19th century.It is also the motto of the
Grand Orient de France and the Grande Loge de France.

Read more here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libert%C3%A9,_%C3%A9galit%C3%A9,_fraternit%C3%A9


This Liberty, equality and fraternity of France is too much "idealism",
like the idealism of socialism, so it is not pragmatic because it is not realistic. USA is more like Liberty like the statue of Liberty in USA ,
and Liberty is Morality and Morality is contineous perfection that is
possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is
possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics that i am doing.

Read the rest:

What is the essence of Liberty ?

If i ask you a question:

Is idealism a morality ?

If you are smart you will immediatly recognize that idealism
like idealism of socialism is like belonging to the set of
solving the problem "locally", it doesn't belong to the "set"
of solving the problems globally, it is as it is not a "general"
theorem in mathematics, idealism is as in artificial intelligence
you are blocking in a local minimum and you are not able to
go to the global minimum that we require in artificial intelligence
such as Deep learning in artifical intelligence, so from those analogies
you will be able to understand that idealism of socialism
is not "reliability", because more scientifically i
have defined reliability as being:

What is the essence of reliability ?

What is reliability ?

We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.

What is corruption of morality ?

How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?

First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you
don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.

So you are able now to understand that idealism or more idealism of
socialism is not reliability , so it is not the right perfection that
solves problems , so it is not Morality that is contineous perfection
that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that
is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
violent.

So now you are more capable of seeing what is Liberty, Liberty is
also Morality, because you can not be Liberty if you are not Morality
that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.


Read the rest:


About morality...

I have explained that:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
mathematics that i am doing.

This is a serious subject, because morality is what gives us
politics and laws etc. so we have to take it seriously, but you will
have the tendency, like idealism of socialism, to say that what i am
doing is like "mathematics" or like "logic" or like "optimization", so
you will ask a question: where is compassion and where is love and where
is tolerance in my definition of morality, i will answer that it is
the essence of morality , because i have made you understand what is
morality, and i have made you understand that "extremism" is constrained
by morality , so morality says to extremism that it is "bad", this is
also what gives tolerance and compassion and love, but if you ask a
question such as: Is morality safe ? it is as you are asking a question
such as: are we today "completely" safe from "diseases"? because you
know for sure that we are still not completely safe from diseases, this
is the same for morality, because you have to be smart and know that
morality is also constrained by economy and other factors.

And here is what i said about idealism to be able for you to understand
more life:

One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:

"Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence."

I want to comment on it more:

I said before that:

"Socialism comes from weakness and insecurity and it wants to have
"compassion" on its people that are more weak and more insecure , but
its idealism comes from the fact that compassion is put as a "high"
priority that bring socialism , but at the same time optimization and efficiency of economy and the system is "postponed" again and again in
favor of compassion of the social side. And the idealism of those acts
of socialism is the fact that socialism is thinking "love" and
compassion , but it is not being "pragmatism" and "responsability" of efficiency and optimization like in UK."


So socialism is also too much idealism, but if socialism says that
"its" compassion is morality, this "kind" of compassion of socialism
belongs to the "set" of "locally" solving the problem, it doesn't belong
to the "set" of globally solving the problem in the system, so
we can not call it "reliability" that is also the right "perfection"
that solves problems and we can not call it Morality that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics that i am
doing , because it is more rigor of logic.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello...

Read this:


Read again, i correct a typo

What is the essence of tolerance and compassion ?

There essence are the same as the essence of a group, we are grouping
because of our weaknesses to become more strong and more perfection to
be able to survive better ! the essence of tolerance and compassion is
the same , we need compassion and tolerance because its inherent to
morality ! because morality is maximizing at best excellence or quality
! but this maximization knows about our weaknesses , so since there is
still weaknesses there
is still comprassion and tolerance ! thus logically weaknesses do
engender tolerance and compassion on the other and on the other races
because of weaknesses of our own and because compassion and tolerance
are also defined by the consequences that are the same as compassion and tolerance, because by a good approximation and we are in fuzzy logic,
the consequences of wise egoism as i have explained lesser egoism of nationalism ! for example wise egoism that is the consumer confidence
index or economic growth that
attract the investment from abroad can be approximated as compassion and tolerance, and notice that if we were Gods we will need less
to group and we will need less compassion and tolerance ! this is
the essence of morality.

So read more about the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

Yet more about the essence of morality and the essence of our civilization:

I have to be more smart..

I have given many definitions of morality and i have explained them to you..

Here is another definition that says that morality is: maximizing
"quality" or the degree of "excellence" at best.

Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence
of something..

But what is reliability ?

We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between
failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing
the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say,
if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance
is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being
perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also
being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can
make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that hurts
to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being
more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state
that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system,
so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality,
so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality
is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality
is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best,
so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection
is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance
with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is
perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality
that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people
of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism
of perfection and quality that hurts.

More profond about philosophy now..

I said before that:

cleanliness generate morality

But what about Donald Trump that said that:

Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries.

Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ?

You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness
is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so
you have to take into account "security" and be less
provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is
not the right requirement of "security" to say the above
about many african countries and about haiti, because
Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent"
and that does not balance with the other requirements
of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security.

Now i give you another example:

Neo-nazism is saying that arabs are not
as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate
them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an
immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards
a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and
"security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements
of today is to have a more interconnected economies
around the world, even with arabs and with africans,
this is because we have to take into account
the economic growth of arab and african countries that
is for example more attractive for economic investment,
also we have to take into account the consumer
confidence index globally and locally,
so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs
and africans, and we have also to take into
account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because
many western countries bring arab and african immigrants
because they are useful for jobs and because they are also
useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to
know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to
others(even globally) to be able for them to buy
your products and services, so i have also proved and said that:
cleanliness generate morality, but as i have just explained that
"cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements
as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements".


More precision about philosophy..

We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to
understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said
before that:

==
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.

And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality.
==


Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality

Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good,
so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing
between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition,
because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad
we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but
as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can
say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more
scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because
"cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid
the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why
the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my
following affirmation correct and true: cleanliness generate morality


I will get into more philosophy..

As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability
or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability.

Now to "model" better humans, we have the following:

sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language

And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.

And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality,

Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too.

And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic.

from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not
"constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and
rationality, we can get violence and insecurity.

I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and "culturally".

Here is my other new thoughts..

What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability"(as i have proved bellow), or simply "reliability"(as i
have proved bellow) that can model morality correctly as i have proved
it in my previous post, so the essence of our civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you
will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and
trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the
governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system
that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum
like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by
applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of
politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization,
is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization,
as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding
my new thoughts of today.


And here is my other thoughts about morality(with my other definitions
about morality):

Morality is also "diversity"

I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the
system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that
there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be
a parasite is also an "idealism"
that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity"
that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an appropriate morality, today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism,
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are "conservatism" of there capitalism.

Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

More smartness about morality..

Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience.

You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.

Now what about my definitions of morality ?

We have to be more smart..

I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad ! so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it,
so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical
proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:


I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.

Now about the right abstraction of morality

What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?

This is a good question in philosophy !

It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more
"measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure
and more precise is like doing mathematics !

Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?

It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !

Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir
Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations
with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is
all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu
to do it in front of your eyes..

So my question of today is:

What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?

A more correct abstraction of morality is first a definition
of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see
more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are
like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that
this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big
picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this
is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality,
and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that
morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word
reliability, and i have also defined morality by saying that it is:
perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give
another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this
abstraction is more correct also , i explain:

So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it
a correct definition ?

It is like philosophy that i am doing..

So notice that i have proved it this way:

==

From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?

Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance".

===


So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition
of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part
of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability",
and i have "proved" it like this:

==

What is the essence of reliability ?

What is reliability ?

We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.

==

So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality,
because the essence of reliability is solving problems and
the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems,
and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability ,
because to be able to solve problems, reliability must
be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that
the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY ,
or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can
be perfection and strongness, but we have to be more
precise with a more correct "abstraction" this is
why you have seen me speaking about "idealism" in
my previous post, and i have said with a more correct
abstraction that morality is also "darkness" and it is also
"diversity", because perfection is not only light but it is also
darkness and it is also diversity, read all my following thoughts as
my proof of what i am saying to be able to understand my smartness:

About the wisdom of my poems..

You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy,
also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am
in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" !
so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have
posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you
more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that
this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow
it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into
pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism
of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that
they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what
is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow
that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving"
problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we
can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems
we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so
morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice
with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also
"diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering,
and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and
weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:

"But the weak becomes better
Because our civilization is not a decoy"


So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting
out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have
said the following on one of my previous post:


My wisdom of today..

A better politics..

Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an
important wisdom:

One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:

Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.

My other wisdom of today is:

A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.


This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:

Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom"
is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being
discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication
of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows
how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.

This wisdom looks like my above one that says:

A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.

So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.

So here is my poem and read it again:

Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be
smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read
my explanation of it bellow:


We are past and present

Because time is like a balance

Because time is perfection

Because perfection is the scale

But how perfection can be only light ?

Perfection is also darkness

Because we are strong and weak

Even silence is strong and weak

Eventhough silence is divine

Because even love is effervescence

Bees know about time

That time is relativity

And relativity is diversity

But what is perfection?

Perfection is also diversity

Diversity is also immensity

Because time is relativity

The weak needs the strong

And the strong needs the weak

But the weak becomes better

Because our civilization is not a decoy

Since diversity is the seed

Since the scale creates consciousness

Because the scale creates abundance

Since diversity is also seasons

Who creates wisdom and reason

So hello to you my dear and beautiful

With your lovely pretty eyes

You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow

To drive us to a beautiful island

Like our love and tenderness

Rather for goods never I leave you!

My sweet and beautiful goddess

My sweet spring and my sweet princess

Our hearts finally beat in unison

Like a nice thrill and a nice song

I do not want to hurt you

Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!

As if both of us were as one

Let's be the flower and the perfum!

And may infinity and depth bring us together

Since our destiny is infinite

Since our destiny has understood

That the pretty fir is not cursed

Because Christmas is divine

As silence is a pretty parfum

Because in the depth of your pretty eyes

Who reminds me of our beautiful raft

Who defies storms and seasons

Since life is not a gift

And because destiny and reason are our passion

Because beauty reminds us

That she can not be violence and hatred

Since relativity of time is like a mason

Since the weather is seasons that brings reason

So, hello to you man of reason!


Amine Moulay Ramdane.

===


First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism
alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so
you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and
to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because
my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have
to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:

When i say in my poem the following:

"We are past and present
Because time is like a balance"

When i say we are past and present it must be measured by
my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem
is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is
both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and
not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering
and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from
the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the
meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"

And now about the following part of my poem:

"Because time is like a balance"

I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need
the causes, this is why time is like a balance.


And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:

"Because time is perfection
Because perfection is the scale"


Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning,
it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand
the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand
by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the
Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection,
and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is
perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that
means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it
is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has
balanced more to be perfection.

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"But how perfection can be only light ?
Perfection is also darkness"


I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it
in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering,
this is why it is also "darkness".

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"Because we are strong and weak
Even silence is strong and weak
Eventhough silence is divine"


I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so
complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of
paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very
"strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have
difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the
reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex
objects.

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"And relativity is diversity"

You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"Perfection is also diversity
Diversity is also immensity
Because time is relativity"

Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say the above.

And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.



thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)