• What has to be politics ?

    From Sky89@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 16 14:32:02 2018
    Hello,

    Read this:

    What has to be politics ?

    I said about morality that:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.

    Read for example this:

    "Now, an even greater threat is coming. Forrester predicts that by 2025, technologies like robots, artificial intelligence (AI), machine
    learning, and automation will replace 7% (or 22.7 million) jobs in the
    US alone."

    https://www.atlassian.com/it-unplugged/best-practices-and-trends/automation-and-ai-are-coming-for-it-jobs-here-s-how-to-keep-yours

    So what about this problem ?

    Since i said that the essence of perfection is the essence of
    "reliability", there essence is that they solves problems,
    and since perfection today is a hard sacrifice of for example scientists
    and engineers that wants to do there best to help humanity, and since
    progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential
    progress, not a linear progress, and don't forget too about the law of accelerating returns that, so i think that in about 15 years or
    20 years(and that's a near future) science and technology will be so
    powerful that that it will be necessary for us humans to be united
    over this earth, so in this near future we have to rethink politics,
    so we have not to waste our time with inferior thinking of neo-nazism or nationalism.


    Read the rest of my thoughts:

    Politics is also like playing chess, you have to be smart to be
    able to succeed, but politics is constrained by "perfection",
    and as you have noticed it is also like philosophy that i am doing, but
    this perfection must be perfection that knows how to "drive", so how
    must we drive ? i think we have to find the "best" possible way that
    guides us towards our goals, so i was thinking more and i think
    that we have to cease to be inferior "thinking" of neo-nazism
    or nationalism because it is archaism as i have explained,
    so what is the right way then ? i think a necessary requirement
    in politics is to do politics knowing in advance that science
    and technology are in many parts advancing exponentially, not linearly,
    and that also we have to be aware of the law of accelerating returns,
    because of that, in about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
    will be able of enhancing our genetics and make us more smart
    and more beautiful and more strong, and in about 15 years or 20 years we
    will be capable of doing much more than that, so this is why politics
    must be aware of this exponential progress of science and
    technology(please read more about it on internet), and this is why
    politics must not be neo-nazism or nationalism and it must be more
    responsable and politics must think differently our world , because in
    about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
    will be really really powerful that we must rethink our world in this
    near future, because in about 15 years or 20 years we have to cease to
    think like racial nationalism that is inferior thinking, because in
    about 15 years or 20 years science and technology will be really really powerful that we have to become more united because this science and
    technology of the near future will permit us to solve much much better
    our world problems.

    Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

    Is morality tolerance and compassion ?

    You have to be smart because it is like philosophy..

    As i said morality that:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
    mathematics that i am doing.


    So i think compassion and tolerance is inherent to perfection,
    because perfection is also a hard "sacrifice" to help the people of
    humanity, and also because the reality proves that perfection is doing
    its best to help humanity, we can notice it by the behavior of
    scientists and engineers and even by the behavior of Google and DeepMind
    and other high tech companies and such , because they are more
    responsable of the well being of humanity as a whole, and this proves
    the "theory" of my definition of morality because perfection is also a
    hard hard "sacrifice" to help people of humanity, this is why morality
    is also "beautiful", so you have not to be pessimistic
    because also progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential progress and in about 15 year or 20 years technology
    and science will be really really powerful and we will
    be able to do really great things such as enhancing our genetics
    and become more beautiful and more smart and more strong
    and we will be capable of doing much more than that ! so don't
    waste your time with neo-nazism or nationalism..


    This is why i said before the following , read the rest of my thoughts
    to understand better my thoughts:

    Is morality beautiful ?

    That's a really an interesting an important question:

    I said that morality is:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
    mathematics that i am doing.


    So i think morality is also beautiful because the hard sacrifice to
    bring perfection is done by for example scientists and engineers , and
    the essence of perfection is the same as the essence of reliability,
    because there essence is the fact that they solves problems so
    they perfect us, so for example scientists and engineers are doing
    there best to bring the best to our humanity and to help humanity, so we
    have to "honor" there sacrifice , Google and DeepMind are also doing a
    great sacrifice to bring the best to humanity and to help humanity ,
    this "perfection" is the essence of morality and it is morality that
    they are doing , there sacrifice is great ! so i am not pessimistic
    because i believe in morality that brings perfection that helps humanity
    like is helping us Google and DeepMind that wants to be in accordance
    with morality. And beautifulness of Google and DeepMind is like my
    following beautiful poem that i invite you to read:


    I am strong like patience

    I am passionate like romance

    I am right as the nuance!

    I am compassionate as hope

    It's like flowers and bees bringing honey

    As our life is made of light and Rainbow

    I am like love, joy and smiles

    Who are also like diamond and sapphire

    Who are also like Satin and Velvet

    Since it's like the Elixir of love

    Since our love is divine

    As dawn is beautiful and comes back

    With its sky and its stars and its divine silence

    Who plunges us into the secrets of our beautiful garden

    Like your emerald, ruby, sapphire and diamond eyes

    We are sun and heat like lovers

    Your soul is a sea of pretty perfumes

    Where love and hope are intertwined

    Like flowers and bees

    Like the taste of honey

    You are like the beauty of dawn that comes back

    And who bathes me in the depths of our destiny

    Of our love which is divine



    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --


    And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


    About the essence of nazism and neo-nazism

    Neo-nazism and nazism is not only national socialism
    but it is also racism inside its group and outside its group,
    it is racism inside its group of white europeans because
    nazism and neo-nazism wants to "perfect" the white european race,
    it is why we say that nazism and neo-nazism are idealism of
    socialism that is a failure as i have explained(read bellow),
    and nazism and neo-nazism are "idealism" of racism, because
    it's too much idealism that wants to "perfect" without taking into
    account the constrains of the realities, so neo-nazism
    and nazism are not pragmatic or realistic, neo-nazism and nazism is what
    we call too much "perfection" that is not correct morality, and you can
    easily notice it when neo-nazism says that all arabs are bad or
    all Israel is bad, without recognizing that it is not
    truth and that it is illogical because not all Israel is bad
    and not all arabs are bad, so we have not to waste our
    time with this idealism of neo-nazism and nazism.

    Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:

    About the essence of perfection..

    What is the essence of perfection ?

    Because i explained and defined morality as:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
    mathematics that i am doing.

    The essence of perfection needs a "reference" of measure, so we have to
    think about the reference of measure of perfection and defined it more correctly, first you have to recognize that i am speaking about
    perfection as general related to the definition of morality,
    so i think that the reference of measure of perfection is like
    the reference of measure of "reliability", because i think
    you are "reliable" if you solve problems, perfection is the same
    because you are perfection when you solve problems, and when you
    are capable of solving "all" the problems we say that you are
    absolute perfection.

    To be more convinced by my writings, look at France and its
    Liberty, equality and fraternity that is the national motto of France
    and the Republic of Haiti, and is an example of a tripartite motto.
    Although it finds its origins in the French Revolution, it was then only
    one motto among others and was not institutionalized until the Third
    Republic at the end of the 19th century.It is also the motto of the
    Grand Orient de France and the Grande Loge de France.

    Read more here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libert%C3%A9,_%C3%A9galit%C3%A9,_fraternit%C3%A9


    This Liberty, equality and fraternity of France is too much "idealism",
    like the idealism of socialism, so it is not pragmatic because it is not realistic. USA is more like Liberty like the statue of Liberty in USA ,
    and Liberty is Morality and Morality is contineous perfection that is
    possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is
    possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also
    inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics that i am doing.

    Read the rest:

    What is the essence of Liberty ?

    If i ask you a question:

    Is idealism a morality ?

    If you are smart you will immediatly recognize that idealism
    like idealism of socialism is like belonging to the set of
    solving the problem "locally", it doesn't belong to the "set"
    of solving the problems globally, it is as it is not a "general"
    theorem in mathematics, idealism is as in artificial intelligence
    you are blocking in a local minimum and you are not able to
    go to the global minimum that we require in artificial intelligence
    such as Deep learning in artifical intelligence, so from those analogies
    you will be able to understand that idealism of socialism
    is not "reliability", because more scientifically i
    have defined reliability as being:

    What is the essence of reliability ?

    What is reliability ?

    We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the
    "reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
    also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right "perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
    and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
    a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
    able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous
    perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
    say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
    "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids
    "extremism" that is too violent. So it
    is like mathematics.

    What is corruption of morality ?

    How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?

    First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
    so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you
    don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.

    So you are able now to understand that idealism or more idealism of
    socialism is not reliability , so it is not the right perfection that
    solves problems , so it is not Morality that is contineous perfection
    that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that
    is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too
    violent.

    So now you are more capable of seeing what is Liberty, Liberty is
    also Morality, because you can not be Liberty if you are not Morality
    that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute
    perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.


    Read the rest:


    About morality...

    I have explained that:

    Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that
    "compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like
    mathematics that i am doing.

    This is a serious subject, because morality is what gives us
    politics and laws etc. so we have to take it seriously, but you will
    have the tendency, like idealism of socialism, to say that what i am
    doing is like "mathematics" or like "logic" or like "optimization", so
    you will ask a question: where is compassion and where is love and where
    is tolerance in my definition of morality, i will answer that it is
    the essence of morality , because i have made you understand what is
    morality, and i have made you understand that "extremism" is constrained
    by morality , so morality says to extremism that it is "bad", this is
    also what gives tolerance and compassion and love, but if you ask a
    question such as: Is morality safe ? it is as you are asking a question
    such as: are we today "completely" safe from "diseases"? because you
    know for sure that we are still not completely safe from diseases, this
    is the same for morality, because you have to be smart and know that
    morality is also constrained by economy and other factors.

    And here is what i said about idealism to be able for you to understand
    more life:

    One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:

    "Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being
    pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence."

    I want to comment on it more:

    I said before that:

    "Socialism comes from weakness and insecurity and it wants to have
    "compassion" on its people that are more weak and more insecure , but
    its idealism comes from the fact that compassion is put as a "high"
    priority that bring socialism , but at the same time optimization and efficiency of economy and the system is "postponed" again and again in
    favor of compassion of the social side. And the idealism of those acts
    of socialism is the fact that socialism is thinking "love" and
    compassion , but it is not being "pragmatism" and "responsability" of efficiency and optimization like in UK."


    So socialism is also too much idealism, but if socialism says that
    "its" compassion is morality, this "kind" of compassion of socialism
    belongs to the "set" of "locally" solving the problem, it doesn't belong
    to the "set" of globally solving the problem in the system, so
    we can not call it "reliability" that is also the right "perfection"
    that solves problems and we can not call it Morality that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i
    say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is
    "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids
    "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics that i am
    doing , because it is more rigor of logic.



    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)