Hello..

Read this:


More about political philosophy..

You have to understand "national" communism of China,
and you have to understand national socialism of
nazism and neo-nazism to understand better the
essence of western countries !

You have to call national socialism of neo-nazism
and nazism by more "expressiveness" to understand more
neo-nazism and nazism, this name of national socialism
of neo-nazism and nazism is not the right definition
of neo-nazism or nazism, because neo-nazism and nazism
is also more violent "racism" and it is also national socialism,
so when neo-nazis or nazis call themselves national
socialists they are not telling the truth ! because
they are also more violent "racism", and this more violent
"racism" is the weakness of "morality" ! because the
weakness of morality as i have proved bellow , is
the fact that morality is quality and morality is perfection
as i have proved it bellow ! so morality can be , like
neo-nazism, as extremism of quality or perfection such
as saying that morality is performance that
can hurt people, because neo-nazism and nazism
is more violent "racism" that say that
people must be "perfected" even by eliminating
handicaped people and by eliminating more and more inferior people,
because morality of neo-nazism and nazism is much
much more oriented towards performance, it's extremism
of quality and perfection ! and this is the weakness
of morality , because morality is perfection and morality
is quality as i have proved it bellow.. so this
is why i have talked about what i called guidance
of moral to avoid this weakness of morality.


About our essence..

You have seen me writing political philosophy..

And you have seen me proving that: morality is reliability and morality
is quality and morality is perfection, how can it be perfection ? since perfection is a high "priority", and we have to "prioritize" to succeed,
but this is not a "finality", because morality is constrained ! because
our essence we white people is knowing how to embellish the world and
how to take into account beautifulness and love, this is what i called "guidance" of moral, because morality is a composition of a priori pure
moral inferred from reason and from empirical moral inferred from
experience, but morality is also quality and perfection, but guidance
of moral is "like" part of morality, because our essence of white people
is here to constrain morality to not being extremism of perfection and extremism of quality that hurts, and this guidance of moral, that is
inherent to our essence we white people, knows how to take into account embellishment and beautifulness and love and how to bring embellishment
and beautifulness and love to our world, this is the strong point
of white people, so we have to be be more responsable we white people , because we are part of the "guidance" of moral that constrain morality
into the right direction.

I invite you to listen to this "beautiful" song of George Harrison -
Here comes the sun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwmVfewqu7I


About the essence of racism

I am a white arab, and you have seen me doing political philosophy here,
i am also of a type of a gentleman, and i am more serious computer
programming, and i have studied more operational research, and
i have done more mathematics, i am a more "technical" kind of
person, i am like more scientific, so the question of today
is what is the essence of racism and how racism must be constrained
by morality ?

The essence of racism, is the essence of weakness or the essence of imperfection, you don't like people that are inferior or imperfect,
this is why you are racism or you are discrimination towards your
people or towards others, so how this must be constrained by morality ?

I think the problem that we have today is that you are getting racist
with arabs, and this is not "morality", because look at me here,
i am a gentleman and i am capable of thinking correctly ,
so you have to distinguish between good or tolerable people and bad
people, so you have to distinguish between good or tolerable arabs and
bad arabs and not hurt good or tolerable arabs, this is what we call
morality, but i am noticing that many are still "inferior" thinking by
not making the difference and being more responsable.

I will invite you to read my following thinking about political
philosophy to understand better my thoughts:


Here is my new thoughts of today about political philosophy..

Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence
of something..

But what is reliability ?

We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between
failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing
the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say,
if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance
is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being
perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also
being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can
make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that hurts
to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being
more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state
that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system,
so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality,
so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality
is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality
is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best,
so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection
is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance
with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is
perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality
that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people
of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism
of perfection and quality that hurts.

More profond about philosophy now..

I said before that:

cleanliness generate morality

But what about Donald Trump that said that:

Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries.

Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ?

You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness
is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so
you have to take into account "security" and be less
provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is
not the right requirement of "security" to say the above
about many african countries and about haiti, because
Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent"
and that does not balance with the other requirements
of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security.

Now i give you another example:

Neo-nazism is saying that arabs are not
as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate
them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an
immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards
a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and
"security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements
of today is to have a more interconnected economies
around the world, even with arabs and with africans,
this is because we have to take into account
the economic growth of arab and african countries that
is for example more attractive for economic investment,
also we have to take into account the consumer
confidence index globally and locally,
so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs
and africans, and we have also to take into
account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because
many western countries bring arab and african immigrants
because they are useful for jobs and because they are also
useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to
know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to
others(even globally) to be able for them to buy
your products and services, so i have also proved and said that:
cleanliness generate morality, but as i have just explained that
"cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements
as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements".


Read the rest:


More precision about philosophy..

We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to
understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said
before that:

==
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.

And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality.
==


Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality

Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good,
so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing
between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition,
because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad
we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but
as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can
say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more
scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because
"cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid
the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why
the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my
following affirmation correct and true: cleanliness generate morality


Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

I will get into more philosophy..

As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability
or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability.

Now to "model" better humans, we have the following:

sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language

And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.

And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality,

Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too.

And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic.

from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not
"constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and
rationality, we can get violence and insecurity.

I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and "culturally".

Here is my other new thoughts..

What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and
"reliability", or simply "reliability" that can model morality correctly
as i have proved it in my previous post, so the essence of our
civilization is the act of coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence
"performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you
will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and
trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the
governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system
that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum
like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by
applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of
politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization,
is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization,
as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding
my new thoughts of today. And about what is the essence of morality,
here is again my own post that speaks about it ( i have corrected few
typos in it):

What is it to be morality ?

This is the most important part of our humanity !

I have proved before that performance is inherent to morality,
and i have showed also that my definition, and that i have
proved, that morality is reliability does show that it ressembles
serious computer programming, and to be more expressiveness you see that performance is inherent to reliability , so reliability
does model efficiently, and we are feeling it like serious
computer programming, because when you define morality
like this by "precise" words , you begin to feel our
essence and you begin to feel the essence of our humanity !
and you become aware that morality is also being capable
and being capable to comprehend ! because this makes us
distinguish the essence of morality ! so you have to not be fooled
by inferior thinking ! because morality is reliability and
reliability is performance too and the application of morality
is part of morality , so the case is closed that morality
of today must be also scientific disciplines and technical disciplines
and morality is the measure of morality that must be reliability
and performance in itself ! this is what is amazing ! you have
to feel it like this and be responsable about it.

Read the rest:

From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?

Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is: we are organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is
inherent to morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance".

I wrote previously this:

Is performance inherent to morality ?

This is good philosophical question !

This is why you have seen me modeling efficient morality
by only one word, by saying and proving that: efficient morality
or morality is: Reliability.

Or by more expressiveness by saying that:

Efficient morality or morality is: Performance and reliability.

So this definition that i have proved shows clearly
that performance is "inherent" to morality or efficient morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on "performance".

Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

What is the essence of reliability?

Can we model efficient morality without it as being also "performance" ?

This is a good philosophical question !

I think the right definition of "reliability" is that of not being "bad".

So not being efficient is also being not being good, so reliability
can model efficiency, that means performance too.

This why also we can define efficient morality by only one word that is:

RELIABILITY.


Please read all the following to understand better my thoughts:

About Wise egoism

I have showed that the essence of tolerance is:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses !
and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses
or by our weaknesses.

So wise egoism dictates to be a "usefulness" or a "utility" to the other because of the essence of tolerance, so this is why we have to be more
useful to sell our products or services to others internationally
and locally, and this usefulness give rise to consumer confidence index
that constrain egoism to be more "tolerance" and more "respect" towards
others and constrain it to share more with others.


About tolerance..

What is it the essence of tolerance ?

Does it has an essence ?

It is this what we call philosophy..

When you become more smart you will find the shortest path to the
solution..

So i will answer it like this:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknesses !
and it is an act that is caused by consciousness of our weaknesses
or by our weaknesses.

Its essence is the same as the essence of "organization" !

We are organizing because of our weaknesses too !

because if we were Gods, the need of organizing as a group will be
"much" lesser !

This is the essence of our humanity that is perfection and strongness,
and perfection and strongness is also saying that efficient morality
is performance and reliability. It is like serious computer programming,
you can also model efficient morality with only one word that is: "reliability", but to be more "expressive", i have said that efficient morality is performance and reliability, and you are feeling it
when you become a more serious programmer like me.

So what is the essence of efficiency?

Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the
ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our
other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that
is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance.

But what is the essence of reliability?

Reliability is the quality of performing consistently well.

Does efficiency model correctly portability in software programming ?

I think yes because we are this portability because portability is
performance of portability that is to be able to run your software
in different hardwares or operating systems, and that's i think also performance.

And does efficiency or reliability model correctly usability?

I think yes.

Does "reliability" model correctly beautifulness ?

I think more beautifulness can mean a "good" thing, and if
it is a good thing , it is not a bug of saying it is a bad thing
, so reliability do model beautifulness correctly.

And we can generalize and say:

Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so
what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so
if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not "reliable",
and it is related to reliability.

This is why i have modeled efficient morality with two words by saying:

Efficient morality is performance and reliability, and it is
like finding the essence of morality.

I said above that:

The essence of tolerance is consciousness of our weaknessess !

So the essence of tolerance is related to security, so it is
related to reliablity, so "reliability" do model tolerance too.


Here is my new and extended post about philosophy and politics..

Yet more precision and more calculations , please follow with me:

The essence of Class Struggle

An idiot will say that Class Struggle such as of communism
is not correct !

But philosophy is not the same , in philosophy you have
to be more rigorous like in mathematics !

I will get on more philosophy..

I think the nature of Class Struggle of communism
has changed a little bit in the West, i mean Class Struggle
of communism has soften, but it is still Class Struggle !
i mean that "Democracy" and "usefulness" or to make
yourself a "utility" or to make yourself "useful" are also Class
Struggle ! and consumerism do bring the counter-power of consumer
confidence index that we have to higher internationally and locally, so
this counter power of consumer confidence index is like Class Struggle
also, this is what i have said bellow that the essence of compassion is
the essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness. And this is
why i have spoken about the essence of Israel in a such
way, because making yourself "useful" is also a wise egoism
that lesser egoism of nationalism and egoism. Here is what i have said:

About the essence of Israel...

You have seen me in my political philosophy introducing to you what i
called guidance of moral as embellishment of humanity, and i have
defined it as being like: happiness and tolerance that are parts of the
set of our essence ! because we are capable of knowing them and feeling
them and measuring with them.

So now there is an important question related to the essence of Israel..

Do we have to judge Israel by this guidance of moral, by saying
for example that Israel is not tolerance and is not happiness
of guidance of moral ?

This is not the right way to measure, you have to be wisdom that knows
how to measure ! so efficient morality that is performance and
reliability must be used as a soft way also that constrain the
spirit of Israel, so Israel must know that efficient morality
must be capable of "balancing" well or "tuning" well if you want, i give
you an example: today we are trying to be efficient morality
that is taking into account not just our today but also taking
into account the future of our planet earth that we have not to hurt
with excessive pollution and exploitation ! this is the kind of spirit
that lacks Israel ! because nationalism must be constrained by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness, so perfection is
that Israel has to know how to think the after and the after after with
arabs, so we have to be frank between us, i think like was saying it
Fordism, consumerism or economy between Israel and arab countries is the
right solution that will bring peace and prosperity, and arabs has to
know it and be capable of being useful to Israel and Israel has to be
capable of being useful to arabs , the interdependence of the two
economies of Israel and arabs will create good relations between arab
countries and Israel.


And i have said also that:

Is Donald Trump nationalism ?

We have to be smart, what do i think about Donald Trump ?
is Donald Trump nationalism ? i think it is a really good
question of philosophy ! so what do thinks philosophy about
it ? i think that we have to look at it from the perspective of
my philosophy that is in accordance with efficient morality,
because philosophy also must adhere to efficient morality to
be able to be called a high standard of philosophy, this
is why i think from my writing of before, that Donald Trump
do adhere to my rule that is: survival is usefulness ! and
as you have noticed that we are more lucky with empirical moral
inferred from experience, because the tools of today are
much more enhanced to bring more dignity to the table,
so if i just say that: survival is usefulness and usefulness
is egoism and survival is egoism.. so if you are less smart you will
think that it is not acceptable, but a smart person will say
that it adheres to the standard of efficient morality that is
as i have defined it: performance and reliability, this is
why we have to be more confident with it, and not be blind and
notice that when i say: survival is usefulness, it is said
in a "context" of today, so it brings many contraints that
provoke quality and bring more quality, usefulness do
cause the rise of different actors as powers and counter-powers,
but don't be stupid to see it as an evil war, because
the tools of today are much more advanced and enhanced, so we have to
be more optimistic about it, because survival is usefulness
and usefulness is egoism and egoism has brought consumer confidence
index that we have to higher internationally and locally, this egoism
is the solution to egoism and nationalism, because consumerism
and consumer confidence index has completely constrained
natonalism and egoism in such a manner that it has lesser
egoism and make the actors of economy to share more with third world
countries and other countries , also usefulness of competitiveness
between different actors of economy has played the same role of egoism
that is the solution to egoism and nationalism, because also
competitiveness and consumerism has completely constrained nationalism
and egoism in such a manner that it has lesser egoism and make the
actors of economy to share more with third world countries and other
countries, and you will notice it from how Donald Trump is talking about economy by saying the following:

US President Donald Trump on Friday said that "America first does not
mean America alone," even as he maintained his country would remain his
top priority. He reminded the audience that "American prosperity created countless jobs in world."
"As President of the United States, I will always put America first...
America first does not mean America alone. When the United States grows,
so does the world,"

Read more here to notice it:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/america-first-does-not-mean-america-alone-us-president-donald-trump-at-wef/articleshow/62664653.cms

So as you have noticed "usefulness" as concept of my rule:
survival is usefulness, is a broader concept that models better
than simply saying like Fordism that consumerism brings prosperity
and peace, because usefulness is a much brother concept that models
better and brings prosperity and peace etc.

The essence of compassion..

We have to do more philosophy to know about it..

What about compassion ?

What is the essence of compassion ?

You have to deeply think philosophy to understand it,
the essence of compassion is the essence of humanity
that is perfection and strongness, the essence of
compassion comes the fact that i said before that:

==
"because a society is constrained by general morality such as laws
that states that what is bad is "relative" to our
level of sophistication by performance and reliability or if you want
that it is relative to the level of quality that we have attained, this
is why i have said, that corruption of morality is measured by
the level of "quality" that we have attained or if you want by the
essence of humanity that is perfection and strongness"

Is there any contradiction or is there a "bug" ?

No, in the above i have said that: "because a society is constrained by
general morality such as laws that states that what is bad is
"relative" to our level of sophistication by performance and reliability"

So i am stating that it is the level of quality that we have attained
by performance and reliability, so morality is constrained by
reliability, so you can not simply say that corruption of morality is
measured by the level of "quality", this will introduce a "bug" that
can bring violence to the system, so measuring of corruption of
morality is measured by and relative to performance and reliability, so
hope you have understood this distinction. And morality is then safe !
==


So the essence of compassion is a balance of powers ! it's
like a balance of powers and counter-powers, this is the essence
of our humanity, perfection and strongness has given rise
to powers and couner-powers that bring more quality to the table !
so without being extermist, i will say that this has the same
effect of "Class Struggle" in communism, because this
brings embellishment and this brings justice and this bring quality,
because look at what i was saying about handicaped people:

If we ask a question of: is handicaped people useful ?

Compassion of government (in form of help) is applied on handicaped
people because i think this is "useful" as a way to embellish our world,
also it is "useful" because the government risks to be punished by
people if he doesn't help handicaped people, and also we risk violence
inside the system if government doesn't help handicaped people.

So as you have noticed that governement is "constrained" by
counter-powers to be able to help handicaped people.

And the essence of compassion is the same as the essence of Democracy,
because as you have noticed i said before that:

About dictatorship and communism and the dictatorship

The problem with those is the problem of the past, because there is
a necessity to provoke and bring quality with the introduction of new mechanisms, like the mechanisms of the counter-power of consumerism and consumer confidence index, and like the mechanism of the power of
democracy, and like the mechanism of the counter-power of the financial
and bank institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this
creates more quality and a world stability, this balance of powers
ensure us of more stability and more quality and more security, this is
the weakness of dictatorship and communism, they lack some of or all of
those mechanisms that bring more quality.


I have said yesterday the following:

--
Does morality exists ?

It is a very good philosophical question !

And that also is the most important question !

I have just thought more about it, and you have to listen to this:

I have defined and proved that efficient morality as being:

Performance and reliability.

But you have to understand something deeper than this !

Democracy of today is a balance of power between "performance" and "reliability", democracy is like a process that balance more correctly
the two powers of: performance in one side and reliability in the other
side ! and this then can be defined as a more appropriate morality.

But dictatorship like dictatorship of China can not be called
appropriate morality, because it doesn't have the correct mechanism of democracy to balance more correctly between performance and reliability.

This is why Dictatorship is dangerous ! and dictatorship can not be
called an appropriate morality ! .
--


I have said the above because look at nazism and neo-nazism, nazism and neo-nazism is racism, but you have not to be fooled by nazism and
neo-nazism, because it is racism also from inside the system and racism
from outside the system, this is why it has persecuted the handicaped
people ! because this kind of racism is "maximization" of efficiency !
and this "maximization" of efficiency is "performance", so
since as i have showed that efficient morality is performance
and reliability, so nazism and neo-nazism do neglect "reliability"
, because there maximization of efficiency is violence that causes
violence inside the system. This is why i have said above that
dictatorship doesn't "balance" correctly between performance and
reliability.

I have said , read bellow, that:

Hitler viewed jews as being "anormal" and more "violent"

and i have said, read bellow, that:

Nazism was not based correctly on science

We have to be more scientific:

So we have to ask ourselves a question:

Is the affirmation of Hitler correct or not correct ?

Is the affirmation of Hitler such as saying that jews are abnormal
and more violent , correct or not correct ?

I think that Hitler was not correct, because we can not say all jews
are bad people, there is a certain still small "percentage" of jews
that are bad, but we can not generalize to all jews and say all
jews are bad, this is the same for arabs, we can not say all arabs are
bad people, because there is only a still "small" percentage of arabs
that are bad, but we can not generalize and say that all arabs are bad.
So we have to refrain from talking like Hitler and we have to be more realistic. And yet we have to make a distinction between "tolerable"
and bad, because the big percentage of arabs are "tolerable" and not
bad, i think it is the same for jews, even if they are not as beautiful
as white europeans. So case is closed !



[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)