XPost: aus.politics, soc.culture.nigeria, alt.fan.countries.ghana
XPost: alt.philosophy
EMAILED DIARY NOTES @ 0845 TO 1312 HOURS ON 27 OCTOBER 2019: "WITH
REGARDS TO A PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S CONTINUING INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 -
MEMORIAL {ie. #24 + #48 + #72 x 2 = #288 - REMEMBRANCE MEMORIALS AS
HISTORICAL REVISIONISM AGAINST ANZAC 2018 CENTENNIAL / #423 + #360 =
#783 - *SABBATH* *AS* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*)} COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER.
— THE *ANATHEMA* OF IRISH / SCOTTISH REPUBLICANISM —
"IT REALLY AIN'T THE PLACE NOR TIME
TO REEL OFF RHYMING DICTION.
BUT YET WE'LL WRITE A FINAL RHYME
WHILE WAITING CRUCIFIXION.
FOR WE BEQUEATH A PARTING TIP <-- ANATHEMA
OF SOUND ADVICE FOR SUCH MEN. <-- ANATHEMA
WHO COME ACROSS IN TRANSPORT <-- ANATHEMA
SHIPS TO POLISH OFF THE DUTCHMEN. <-- ANATHEMA
IF YOU ENCOUNTER ANY BOERS,
YOU REALLY MUST NOT LOOT 'EM.
AND IF YOU WISH TO LEAVE THESE SHORES,
FOR PITY SAKE DON'T SHOOT THEM.
LET'S TOSS A BUMPER DOWN OUR THROAT,
BEFORE WE PASS TO HEAVEN.
AND TOAST A TRIMSET PETTICOAT,
WE LEAVE BEHIND IN *DEVON*." [HARRY "BREAKER" HARBORD MORANT died: 27
FEBRUARY 1902 / BOER WAR ENDED 31 MAY 1902]
[D, {@1: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4)},
E, {@2: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#13); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#9)},
V, {@3: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#17); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#85)},
O, {@4: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#81: SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION
PRINCIPLE); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#145: KANT'S OBSERVATION: THE
SCHEMA OF REALITY IS EXISTENCE IN A DETERMINATE TIME / THE SCHEMA OF
NECESSITY IS THE EXISTENCE OF AN OBJECT FOR ALL TIME)},
N] {@5: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#114: BEING A PREMISE OF ONTIC
SUBSTITUTION AS CRITERIA OF #342 - VEXATIOUS VAIN OPINIONS AGAINST THE PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG
(#195: POSSIBILITY OF EXPERIENCE ITSELF, AND GROUND THE OBJECTIVE
VALIDITY OF THEIR SYNTHESIS)}
ANATHEMA {@86 + @168 = #254 / @156 + @148 = #304}:
WE BEQUEATH A PARTING TIP TO THAT REPUBLICANISM OF THOSE IRISH /
SCOTTISH (nationalistic characteristic) WHO COME ACROSS IN TRANSPORT SHIPS
1 something or someone that one vehemently dislikes: racial hatred was
anathema to her.
2 a formal curse by a pope or a council of the Church, excommunicating a
person or denouncing a doctrine: the Pope laid special emphasis on the
second of these anathemas.
• literary a strong curse: the sergeant clutched the ruined
communicator, muttering anathemas.
ORIGIN: early 16th century: from ecclesiastical Latin, ‘excommunicated person, excommunication’, from Greek anathema ‘thing dedicated’, (later) ‘thing *DEVOTED* to evil, accursed thing’, from anatithenai ‘to set up’.
INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTE @ 0859 HOURS ON 21 SEPTEMBER 2019: "DEVON:
DEVOLUTION, EVOLUTION OR SOLUTION
A goal for this informal research is to determine whether there is any
SYNAPTIC neurological sequence bypass that is determined by the
resultant dialectic:
vEVENT: 56995384@{
@1: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#34); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#76),
@2: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#37); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#94: CONDEMNATION),
@3: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#38: 8 JUNE AS TEMPORAL CRITERIA FOR SEDITION); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#114: BEING A PREMISE OF ONTIC
SUBSTITUTION AS CRITERIA OF #342 - VEXATIOUS VAIN OPINIONS AGAINST THE PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY),
Male: #38; Feme: #114
}
For instance if the EGO is framed by a specific dialectic does this
predispose a prerogative towards such as a canonical compliance:
#40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40),
#80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#120),
#50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#170),
#10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY
WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
#20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8})
THUS if [#40, #80, #50, #10, #20] is considered a SYNAPTIC neurological sequence will the resultant selection of any CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING aggregations be biased towards such as precipitation towards any
probability determination of a propensity for its *SOLUTION*,
*DEVOLUTION* OR *EVOLUTION*?
And to achieve some comprehension of such we’ll need to structure our
HEBREW / GREEK lexicon (ie. as GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET) by its dialectic hierarchy to facilitate a pulse as hot zone enquiry.
JUST A REFLECTION ON THIS KANTIAN PERSPECTIVE: NOW CONNECTION IS NO ACT
OF MERE SENSE AND INTUITION, BUT IS HERE THE PRODUCT OF A SYNTHETIC
FACULTY OF THE IMAGINATION THAT DETERMINES THE INNER SENSE WITH RESPECT
TO RELATION IN TIME.
That our cause for sensibility and intuition is a neural linguistic
streaming which has a temporal relativity. Against which we will then
apply a language independent REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR to obtain a resultant dialectic which will be dispersed by its natural order as
priority emphasis from #1 - CENTRE to #9 - BRANCHING OUT:
[D, {@1: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4 (*): #21 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE
{LIABILITY}); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE)},
E, {@2: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#13: #0 CE {13-17 JAN}, #15 CE
{18-22 JAN}, #34 CE {22-26 JAN}, #65 CE {27-31 JAN} ... ); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)},
V, {@3: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#17: 2017); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU
(#85)},

<
http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
DEVON: {@5: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#114: BEING A PREMISE OF ONTIC SUBSTITUTION AS CRITERIA OF #342 - VEXATIOUS VAIN OPINIONS AGAINST THE PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG
(#195: POSSIBILITY OF EXPERIENCE ITSELF, AND GROUND THE OBJECTIVE
VALIDITY OF THEIR SYNTHESIS)}
And its content determined by any ONTIC cohesion and the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING aggregations:
#1 #2 #3 = #6 ?
#8 #9 #4 (*) = #21 ?
#7 #6 #5 = #18 ?
INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTE @ 0748 HOURS ON 24 SEPTEMBER 2019: "Hopefully
today we will conclude our transition towards a more wholesome approach
as programmatic implementation of our widget controls and before we
begin to examine the philosophical question of SYNAPTIC CONSCIOUSNESS
rather than SAPIENT CONSCIOUSNESS which will require us to deploy an
additional dataset:
POSTSCRIPT UPDATE @ 1326 HOURS ON 29 OCTOBER 2019: "We've now
transitioned each of the memeBrain prototype's widget controls into a programmatic d3 implementation excepting the input file read process:
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?memeBrain>
Having implemented within less than 1000 lines of Javascript a
functional provisional memeBrain {} FORM object as comprising a DEFAULT template having a FORM / DATA pairing (we've since truncated the
designates @FORM / @DATA)
"@TEMPLATE": {
"FORM" : {
...
},
"DATA" : {
...
}
}
This will allow us in the future to add further FORM / DATA pairing interactions.
From today we are going to start an implementation within our GRUMBLE prototype the equivalent of the GRAPPLE prototype's calcTelos()
functionality, however instead of generating the @memeBrain as <span>
tags, we are going to create a virtual event vEVENT {} comprising an
object which is referenced by a time derived numerical HANDLE: 12345678.
Thus:
vEVENT {
12345678: {type: 'jackNote', ... event object description ... }
}
And then we'll develop the necessary d3 WIDGET / FORM {} objects which
will present the data to us. Our intention is to be capable of a
walk-through of the GIZMO / vEVENT {} arrays ...
We can only spend two days on this development before then having to
return to the writing of a STATEMENT for our legal matters before 18
NOVEMBER 2019 ... " [END OF POSTSCRIPT UPDATE]
Suffice to say, that the designation 34-65-73 as a file name for
instance would contain the dialect sequence as a neural linguistic
redacted approach which included the lexicon references that met such
criteria but we cannot because of the limitation as the file store
naming convention (rather than by wildcard SQL query) then consider any
SAPIENT bias as being a predisposition to any LIMIT.
For instance can any single NOUS such as #25 for this SPRING / AUTUMN
day 24 September 2019 or its aggregation then function as a neurological trigger such that whilst our example criteria of: 34-65-73 would not be
a condition which occurred naturally but if the exception {25}-34-65-73 manifested in a circumstance the probability of a condition would likely
occur.
THUS TO CONVEY A PROVISIONAL HYPOTHESIS ON HOW WE DEVISE WITH NOUMENON RELATIVITY ANY CRITERIA SUCH AS “CRISIS OF CLIMATE” BY A DIALECT
SEQUENCE AS A NEURAL LINGUISTIC REDACTED APPROACH
— CRISIS OF CLIMATE — {@1: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#43); Ego: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#17)},
"IT'S HOT AND DRY. {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#78); Ego: 49 -
FLIGHT: T'AO (#66)},
THERE'S NO RAIN. {@3: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#135); Ego: 20 -
ADVANCE: CHIN (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10})},
THE FISH DO DIE. {@4: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#199); Ego: 13 -
INCREASE: TSENG (#99)},
CROPS ARE VAIN" {@5: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#253); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26})}
CAN THE PROBLEM THEN BE DEFINED AS EQUIVALENT:
NATURE: 17-49-20-13-69
NURTURE: 43-35-57-65-54
AS POSSESSING A CRITERIA OF ONTIC NECESSITY BY ITS MORAL IMPERATIVE
HAVING A DESTRUCTIVE IMPETUS WHICH IS THE CENTRAL ISSUE THAT MUST BE
RESOLVED RATHER THAN ANY SPECIFIC LABYRINTH OF SUPERFICIALITIES:
@86 + @168 = #254 as [#8, #200, #40, #6] = chêrem (H2764): {UMBRA: #15
as #248 % #41 = #2} 1) a thing *DEVOTED*, thing dedicated, *BAN*,
devotion; 2) a net, thing perforated; 3) have been utterly destroyed, (appointed to) utter destruction;
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{254}>
— A MARTIN SOP — {@1}
"NO WAY I SAY, {@2}
A DERIDER EULOGY. {@3}
BUT MAN UP TODAY, {@4}
IT'S TIME TO PAY, {@5}
DON'T PASS AWAY." {@6}
vEVENT: 53073876 (#304 - A MARTIN SOP POEM: TO BE PUT UNDER THE BAN, BE
DEVOTED TO DESTRUCTION POLICY)@{
@1: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#36); Ego: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#54),
@2: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#77 AS #CENTRE OF #231 - JUXAPOSITION CONTROL); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#69),
@3: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#128); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI
(#83),
@4: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21});
Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@5: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#225); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT:
CHIEN (#203),
@6: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#288: #24 + #48 + #72 x 2 = #288 -
REMEMBRANCE MEMORIALS AS HISTORICAL REVISIONISM AGAINST ANZAC 2018
CENTENNIAL / #423 + #360 = #783 - *SABBATH* *AS* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*));
Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#208),
Male: #288; Feme: #208
}
ONTIC CHECKSUM: @156 + @148 = #304 as [#6, #50, #8, #200, #600] / #333
as [#30, #5, #8, #200, #10, #40, #600] = châram (H2763): {UMBRA: #19 as
#248 % #41 = #2} 1) to ban, devote, destroy utterly, completely destroy, dedicate for destruction, exterminate; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) *TO*
*PROHIBIT* (*FOR* *COMMON* *USE*), *BAN*; 1a2) to consecrate, devote,
dedicate for destruction; 1a3) to exterminate, completely destroy; 1b) (Hophal); 1b1) *TO* *BE* *PUT* *UNDER* *THE* *BAN*, *BE* *DEVOTED* *TO* *DESTRUCTION*; 1b2) to be devoted, be forfeited; 1b3) to be completely destroyed; 1c) to split, slit, mutilate (a part of the body); 1c1) (Qal)
to mutilate; 1c2) (Hiphil) to divide;
AND WE ALSO WITH RESPECT TO ANALYSIS OF SPEECH WANT TO CONSIDER WHAT
KANT conveys of “*TRUTH* *IS* *THE* *AGREEMENT* *OF* *COGNITION* *WITH* *OBJECT*”
Given that such denial of *GOSSIP* will behave as clarity by our
applying REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR redaction to the statement of
denial by persons claiming a piety we wish to determine by our exemplar narrative just how far one is able to penetrate and deduce what is the OBJECTIVE REALITY as TRUTH:
SCOTT MORRISON has dismissed, yet not denied, what he called "*GOSSIP*"
about Hillsong pastor Brian Houston.
* The Wall Street Journal reported Mr Morison had wanted Mr Houston to
be with him at some events
* Mr Houston said he was never contacted by Mr Morrison and called the
story "baseless rumours"
* The PM's office said all invitations to the state dinner at the White House were issued at the discretion of the hosts
The Wall Street Journal first reported the Prime Minister had wanted Mr
Houston to be with him at some events during his current state visit to
the United States, but the request was rejected by White House officials
during the planning process.
When asked questions about whether the report was true, Mr Morrison did
not dispute the facts of the story.
"I don't comment on *GOSSIP*, honestly," he said.
"It's all *GOSSIP*."
When repeatedly asked to clarify what he meant by "*GOSSIP*", he added:
"I think I've answered the question."
The Prime Minister's office had earlier said all invitations to Friday
night's state dinner in the White House rose garden were issued at the discretion of the hosts.
However, for this sort of large, carefully stage-managed formal event it
is standard for guest lists to be discussed by officials on both sides
ahead of time.
Mr Houston, the founder of the Hillsong Church, was censured by the
*ROYAL* *COMMISSION* into the Institutional Responses to Child Sexual
Abuse.
It found Mr Houston had failed a victim by not reporting allegations
against his father, Frank, to police. Frank Houston, who died in 2004, confessed to sexually abusing a boy in New Zealand.
The younger Mr Houston has had a long relationship with the Prime Minister.
Mr Morrison addressed the opening of the evangelical church's annual
conference weeks after his election win earlier this year.
He and his wife, Jenny, have often attended the event. They are members
of a different Pentecostal Christian church.
On Twitter and in a statement, Mr Houston rejected the story about his
apparent White House snub and said he never had any plans to be in
Washington.
"The PM never contacted me about this and I know nothing about it," he
wrote.
"As far as I'm concerned this is a baseless rumour and totally false news.
"Attempts to link this untrue story to the *ROYAL* *COMMISSION* are unconscionable."
Several senior members of the Trump administration describe themselves
as conservative Christians and the US cabinet even has a White House
bible study group.
Vice-President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos reportedly are members.
They also occasionally speak about their religious faith in public.
For example, during an interview with a Christian broadcaster in March,
Mr Pompeo said it was "possible" that President Trump was sent by God to
save Israel from Iran. [<
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-22/scott-morrison-hillsong-pastor-brian-houston-white-house/11536792>]
EXCERPT FROM PAGES 87 TO 88 OF 7 JULY 2019 LETTER AS COMPLAINT TO
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD: "And thusly before we return to the actual
contents of our letter of 8 NOVEMBER 2017 made to the STATE / FEDERAL
ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL SENATOR PENNY WONG as our *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* we need cohere from the context of the *OBJECTIVE*
*REALITY* which is the underlying anthropological cosmogonic principle
basis to sapience itself and a metastasised premise to identity as the
POINT OF REFERENCE AS PERSPECTIVE so that intelligence should not submit
to ignorance which is here the problem in relation to any further as
future *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND* *THE* *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS*.
CAVEAT: Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my
causal infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am entirely reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its potential utility and material merits.
AS BEING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IMPETUS OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AND ACCORDING BREXIT WITH THE
QUINTESSENTIAL MECHANICS OF PROCESS BY AN ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PREMISE {
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@82 / #491
@164 / #3273
@123 / #2188
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION
} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN
MY HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE
EUROPEAN UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST
PRINCIPLE OF ALL SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AS IDEA @A157: “OF THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING [IDEAS: @A154 / @B193] It is
therefore given: that if one must go outside a given concept to compare
[IDEAS: @A155 / @B194] it synthetically with another, then a third thing
is needed, in which alone the synthesis of two concepts can originate.
But what is then this third thing, the medium of all synthetic
judgments? . . .
If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to
relate to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that
*OBJECT*, then the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.
Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
them, one has in fact cognized [IDEA: @195] nothing through this
thinking, but has merely played with representations.
To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, [IDEA: @A156] but exhibiting it immediately in intuition – is nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience
(whether actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as
these concepts are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also
that they are represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless
be without *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if
their necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF*
*EXPERIENCE* – indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is
always related to the reproductive imagination, which calls forth the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* without which they would have no
significance; and thus it is with all concepts, without distinction.
The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*
to all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic
unity of the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it
would not even be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no
context would agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly
connected (possible) consciousness, hence also not for the
transcendental and necessary unity of apperception.
Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
[IDEA: @B196] namely universal rules of unity in the synthesis of the appearances, whose [IDEA: @A157] *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* as necessary
{#287 - STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed
to in experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this
relation, however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely
impossible, since they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*,
upon which the synthetic unity of their concepts could establish
*OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.
Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space
in general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes
in it, that we actually require no experience thereto at all;
nonetheless, this cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation
with a mere brain phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a condition of the appearances that constitute the stuff of outer
experience; in consequence, these pure synthetic judgments relate
(albeit only mediately) to possible experience, or rather to the
*POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND* *THE*
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon that alone.
Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as
a [IDEA: @B197] priori cognition the other synthesis also has truth (*AGREEMENT* *WITH* *AN* [IDEA: @A158] *OBJECT*) only in that it
contains nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of experience in general.
The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY*
*OBJECT* *FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE*
*SYNTHETIC* *UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A*
*POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in
this way: if we relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the synthesis of the imagination, and its necessary unity in a
transcendental apperception to a possible cognition of experience in
general and say: the conditions of the possibility of experience in
general are at the same time the conditions of the possibility of the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON HAVE *OBJECTIVE*
*VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to 180]
Improper and non-designated wreaths (x2 and bouquet) were removed @ 1245
HOURS ON SATURDAY 26 OCTOBER 2019 from the PRECINCT of the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL and disposed of within the GARBAGE as conforming to a PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL since such commemorations
ought to have occurred upon the SUNDAY prior or upon 31 MAY each year.
Not only was such a tribute an affront to my DUTCH ancestry given their discovery recorded upon 26 OCTOBER 1616, but an ANTI-SEMITIC imperative
as abject cruelty exhibited by the repugnant ideology of REPUBLICANISM
which has an IRISH / SCOTTISH nationalistic characteristic (ie. for this
cause they have OBSTRUCTED BREXIT) that improperly has sought to impose
its ROMAN CATHOLIC / STATE dogma upon our WAR DEAD has not appeared in
the world since the ROMAN #65 - SOLDIERS drove their nails into the
limbs of a certain NAZARENE.
SATURDAY 26 OCTOBER <-- DUTCH DISCOVERY in 1616 / SABBATH DAY
SUNDAY 27 OCTOBER <-- OAK TREE PLANTING BY PRINCE HENRY IN 1934 / SALE
HORSE RACES / OUR TRIBUTE PLACEMENT AT 0300 HOURS YEAR PRIOR AS STATE /
FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS ADVISED
MONDAY 28 OCTOBER <-- BEERSHEBA PLOT COMMEMORATION 2017 / I PLACED
WREATHS THERE WHICH REMAINED UNTIL SALE MAGISTRATES COURT ON 8 NOVEMBER
2017 AS STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS ADVISED
TUESDAY 29 OCTOBER <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT / ESTABLISHMENT
OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL 1909 AND RE-SITED 25 APRIL 1972
And pictures were immediately taken of the OAK TREE plaque @ 1248 HOURS
as HISTORICAL CONTEXT to the PRECINCT and of a later attendance at the
SALE WAR CEMETERY @ 1423 HOURS.
I consider that it was a prudent community action to have removed those improper wreaths from the BOER WAR MEMORIAL yesterday since IVAN MILAT
died overnight and such tribute would have clashed with our history of
BREAKER MORANT and his being subject to #902 - RULE OF LAW and then
execution for the slaughter of innocents.
EXCERPT FROM PAGES #166 TO #175 AS COUNTY COURT FILING 3 APRIL 2019 AS
TITLED: "PART FOUR ON SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS
FOR COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER" dated 11 March 2019
— TRUTH WHISPERS AS TEARS IN RAIN —
“WHAT OF GODHEAD.
AND IMAGO DEI.
OR TRUTH {ie. ICOSAHEDRON as truth force of Authority; Stability; 'One
Right Way'} CONVEY?
BY PURE CONCEIT.
WHY BE WICKED.
SUCH AS THEE.
OF BLASPHEMY.
SELFISH DECEIT.
WHOM DID BLEED.
WAS IT NOT FOR ME?
YOUR COCK {ie. DODECAHEDRON as Myths; Ancestors; Traditions; Our People}
DENY.
NOW ALL FORFEIT.” [Written: 3 December 2017]
YOUTUBE: “Time to Die (Gary Numan)”
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYt8Ia2nCWk>
This is actually a cognitive strategy which I have provisionally sought
to develop as a work in progress about ethereal thinking on how to
remedy the promiscuous / daemonic self righteous circumstance as
consequential abrogation of individual integrity {#1 - NATURE CONTAINS
NATURE}, loss of popularity {#2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE},
avoidance of inextricable *DILEMMA* {#3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE} and
to facilitate subtle intuition {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE} which
is causal to being within the space / time dynamic in promulgating an
unimpeded process that in this example of reading, is the traversal of consciousness within the fabric of time itself.
*DILEMMA* (noun):
- A situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives.
- Any difficult or perplexing situation or problem.
- [Logic]: A form of meta-dialectic syllogism *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *TEN* *COMMANDMENTS* (*NOMOS* *COMPRISING* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *TETRAD* *ENCOMPASSING* *OUR* *NOMENCLATURE* *AND* *BASIS* *TO* *INTELLECTUS*
*AS* *GENITIVE* *VOLUNTĀTIS*:
#A {Major Premise},
#B {Minor Premise},
#C {Assumptive Proposition},
#D {Restatement of a Sacred / Sovereign Principle}
In which the major premise is formed of two or more hypothetical
propositions and the minor premise is a disjunctive proposition, as
'IF #A {#1 - Nature Contains Nature} THEN #B {#2 - Nature Rejoices in
its Nature};
IF #C {#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature} THEN #D {#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}.
EITHER #A OR #C.
THEREFORE, EITHER #B OR #D.'
[Origin 1515–25 CE: Late Latin from Greek dílēmma, equivalent to di + lêmma an assumption, premise, derivative of lambánein to take {#384 as
[#5, #300, #10, #3, #6, #50, #10] = nasag nasag (H5381): {UMBRA: #1 as
#353 % #41 = #25} 1) to reach, overtake, take hold upon; 1a) (Hiphil);
1a1) to overtake; 1a2) to reach, attain to, cause to reach; 1a3) to be
able to secure, reach, have enough}.
That thought has taken me some 36 minutes to write so that it was not
simply coherent, but rather weighted towards the substantial. But did
you notice that my earlier ethereal paragraph contains this very
intellectual TETRAD which we will theoretically summarise as this
working hypothesis that can no doubt be improved upon with more
contemplative thought, our cognition evolves as we gain experience
within the subject we are now only just an introduction to reality. In
short it is punctiliousness, as the exercise of an inherent function by
a reasoning mind, which was cast forward to a point yet future in time,
whereby it constructed the narrative as a neural linguistic streaming
and then continued to refine {ie.
#433 as [#6, #1, #90, #200, #80, #50, #6] = tsaraph (H6884): {UMBRA: #4
as #370 % #41 = #1} 1) to smelt, refine, test; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to smelt, refine; 1a2) to test; 1a3) to test (and prove true); 1a4) smelter,
refiner, goldsmith (participle); 1b) (Niphal) to be refined; 1c) (Piel)
to be a refiner; 1c1) refiner (participle);
} it until I had reached a satisfactory conclusion.
To illustrate this further as an innate concept of a notional intuition
as to then suppose the existence of attributed time, I would assert that
you as reader, would have a high probability of little to no difficulty
in writing a Christmas prose at anytime of year. This is because you
have as the basis of experience some learned conceptual apprehension of
the atmospheric characteristics as meta-descriptor prototypes which are conducive to giving any such narrative {#5 - ACT OF NATURE} a particular emphasis {#1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE}, plausibility {#2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE}, comprehensibly {#3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE}
or even perhaps a determined bias {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}.
And @ 0436 hours, I will write [SEE: IMAGO DEI time check authentication
for 0438 hours below] some more on this later at an appreciably suitable
hour. And thus you will observe, my existentialist usage of language and essentially concordant actions are as NATURAL AND PRACTICED conduct
whose primary virtue is the determination of an authenticity as
consciousness which is then instantiated within time. This is a civil consequence as the product of my social and work experience, which has conformity with this as a life principle, being a non-stubborn
characteristic that is given to the voluntary exercise as to an AUTONOMY
OF WILL.
I would therefore, disagree with the general view of the existentialist,
that the individual's starting point is characterized by what has been
called 'the existential attitude', or a sense of disorientation,
confusion, or dread in the face of an apparently meaningless or absurd
world. Many existentialists have also regarded traditional systematic
or academic philosophies, in both style and content, as being too
abstract and remote from any concrete as meaningful human experience: I
think, therefore I am. [Wikipedia 2017: Existentialism]
I describe this a priori 'existential attitude' as being a neural
linguistic cognitive process by which the mind freely desires {
#514 as [#6, #50, #2, #100, #300, #50, #6] = baqash (H1245): {UMBRA: #1
as #402 % #41 = #33} 1) to seek, require, desire, exact, request; 1a)
(Piel); 1a1) to seek to find; 1a2) to seek to secure; 1a3) to seek the
face; 1a4) to desire, demand; 1a5) to require, exact; 1a6) to ask,
request; 1b) (Pual) to be sought
} to inform itself.
Thus to convey an excerpt of my 12 MAY 2017 DIARY NOTE ON MY TRIP TO
NORTH KOREA SO AS TO CHAT WITH KIM JONG UN, OUR *ENJOYMENT* *OF*
*WAGNER* *OPERA* AND AND DISCUSSIONS ON HIS FORTH COMING MEMOIR: *THE*
*ART* *OF* *DICTATORSHIP* *IN* *THE* *SLAUGHTER* *OF* *THE* *YOUTH*:
"Which presents itself as "a presentation of traditional Chinese culture
as it once was: a study in grace, wisdom, and the virtues distilled from
the five millennia of Chinese civilization."
YOUTUBE: "Khumbaya - Judith Durham and The Seekers"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYJMtn6IJeE>
Despite the common perception the group's teachings officially eschew
most forms of political involvement. Of course, given the beliefs of the
group, "political involvement" is rather creatively defined , that they
are in general troublemakers as pestilence -- as evidenced by protests
and advocating against same-sex marriage with mantric proclamations that
"gays should be treated as patients" and "abnormal sex behaviour leads
to abnormal crime."
Or [that even the] Chinese government is acceptable {ie. #81 - POLITICS
IS A SEMANTICAL CONSTRUCT WHICH GIVES RISE TO THE ORGANIZATION OF THE
MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}, while
actually becoming a politician is discouraged as "democracy, because it
goes against the will of heaven" {ie. #41 as #CENTRE OF BEING IS A
TRANSCENDENT PRINCIPLE OF A MATHEMATICAL LOGICAL AND CERTAINTY AS HAVING
AN INESCAPABLE CONSEQUENCE OF CONSENSUS AND NOT FASCISM}
And I plan to discuss with Mr Kim JONG UN some issues about his duck
breeding hobby and whether he has made genetic advances in breeding out
that dreadful fascist *QUACK*. [NOTE: ADOLF HITLER ON 12 MAY 1942
SUGGESTED: "MY AGE SAVES ME FROM THE SUSPICION THAT I AM PERHAPS
PLEADING #321 - *PRO* *DOMO*"]
And I hope Mr Kim JONG UN will share with me some of his sage wisdom
from his Art of Dictatorship and what he means by the enigmatic expression:
"GIVE AN ECUADORIAN A STICK AND THEY WILL PICK {ie. among the Spanish
speakers of South American a more greedy and violent disposition} THEIR
NOSES WITH IT, BUT GIVE IT TO A JAPANESE AND THEY WILL TRANSFORM IT INTO
AN ART"
The Dutch colonial experience with the Japanese in particular involves
boundary and the autonomy of experience being confined (if my memory is correct) to an island and villages."
WAS THE NARRATIVE THEN FACT OR FICTION OR WAS IT A FORM OF
META-NARRATIVE ESTABLISHING TEMPORAL MARKERS?
And your response will no doubt be there was no "*ENJOYMENT* *OF*
*WAGNER* *OPERA*" and so the statement entirely fiction.
HOWEVER IN THEN CONSIDERING YANG HSIUNG'S 4 BCE COMMENTARY ON TETRA #3 ASSOCIATED TO THE *PERIAPSIS* ON 3 JANUARY / AS *HAPAX* *GRAPHOMENON*
meaning “stone,” the second means “firm” or “solid” AS PARALLELISM TO
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
