• Re: Lester Chow is a FRAUD

    From Han Mann@21:1/5 to James Takayama on Thu Feb 2 17:37:56 2023
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect
    other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will
    never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants
    and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members
    who reside abroad in the United States of America.


    We have investigated thoroughly and can verify with absolute certainty that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent. Xi Jinping himself acknowledges such, but yet refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to James Takayama on Thu Feb 2 17:52:49 2023
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect
    other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will
    never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants
    and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members
    who reside abroad in the United States of America.


    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent. Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far as can be determined, his imperial majesty
    does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services as a mediator of transnational and Chinese domestic concerns.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to Han Mann on Thu Feb 2 17:58:29 2023
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:52:51 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it
    is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep
    the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members who reside abroad in the United States of America.
    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent. Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far as can be determined, his imperial
    majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services as a mediator of transnational and Chinese domestic concerns.


    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to Han Mann on Thu Feb 2 18:37:45 2023
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 4:20:03 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:58:30 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:52:51 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof
    (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references,
    people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you
    money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of
    these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning
    postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will
    never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it
    is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many
    times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep
    the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants
    and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html
    Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members
    who reside abroad in the United States of America.
    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent. Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far as can be determined, his imperial
    majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services as a mediator of transnational and Chinese domestic concerns.
    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.
    Who by the way is James Takayama? He obviously doesn't know Chow personally. Where is his evidence to support his aspersions? He claims to be on an outer island, but fails to specify. We can assume that if he is even a real man, he does not live on
    Oahu, where Chow lives. So, what's his real, agenda? His name is Japanese. Perhaps he has some Chinese heritage, but nevertheless, has had no personal dealings with Chow at all.

    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent.
    Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far
    as can be determined, his imperial majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services
    as a mediator of transnational and Chinese domestic concerns.

    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not
    necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.

    Who by the way is, James Takayama? His name is Japanese. Perhaps he has some Chinese heritage?
    He obviously doesn't know Chow personally. Where is his evidence to support his aspersions? He claims
    to be on an outer island, but fails to specify. He does not live on the same island as Chow, and makes
    no assertion to have had any personal dealings with him at all. So, what's his real, agenda?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to Han Mann on Thu Feb 2 18:20:02 2023
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:58:30 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 3:52:51 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof
    (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you
    money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of
    these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning
    postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it
    is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many
    times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep
    the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members who reside abroad in the United States of America.
    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent. Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far as can be determined, his imperial
    majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services as a mediator of transnational and Chinese domestic concerns.
    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.

    Who by the way is James Takayama? He obviously doesn't know Chow personally. Where is his evidence to support his aspersions? He claims to be on an outer island, but fails to specify. We can assume that if he is even a real man, he does not live on
    Oahu, where Chow lives. So, what's his real, agenda? His name is Japanese. Perhaps he has some Chinese heritage, but nevertheless, has had no personal dealings with Chow at all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to James Takayama on Thu Feb 2 19:13:33 2023
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect
    other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will
    never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants
    and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members
    who reside abroad in the United States of America.



    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent.
    Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far
    as can be determined, his imperial majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services
    as representative of Royal Family members in the United States. Of which there no doubt are many.

    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not
    necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.

    Who by the way is, James Takayama? His name is Japanese. Perhaps he has some Chinese heritage?
    He obviously doesn't know Chow personally. Where is his evidence to support his aspersions? He claims
    to be on an outer island, but fails to specify. He does not live on the same island as Chow, and makes
    no assertion to have had any personal dealings with him at all.

    So, what is Takayama's hidden agenda?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to James Takayama on Thu Feb 2 18:45:24 2023
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect
    other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will
    never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants
    and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members
    who reside abroad in the United States of America.

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent.
    Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far
    as can be determined, his imperial majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services
    as a mediator of transnational and Chinese domestic concerns.

    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not
    necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.

    Who by the way is, James Takayama? His name is Japanese. Perhaps he has some Chinese heritage?
    He obviously doesn't know Chow personally. Where is his evidence to support his aspersions? He claims
    to be on an outer island, but fails to specify. He does not live on the same island as Chow, and makes
    no assertion to have had any personal dealings with him at all. So, what's his real, agenda?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to Han Mann on Fri Feb 3 13:22:25 2023
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:13:34 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it
    is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep
    the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members who reside abroad in the United States of America.
    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent.
    Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far
    as can be determined, his imperial majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services
    as representative of Royal Family members in the United States. Of which there no doubt are many.

    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not
    necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.

    Who by the way is, James Takayama? His name is Japanese. Perhaps he has some Chinese heritage?
    He obviously doesn't know Chow personally. Where is his evidence to support his aspersions? He claims
    to be on an outer island, but fails to specify. He does not live on the same island as Chow, and makes
    no assertion to have had any personal dealings with him at all.

    So, what is Takayama's hidden agenda?


    Op-Ed: Here’s how to reform the law that made the internet

    MARK WEINSTEIN
    FEB. 3, 2023

    The case was brought by the family of a woman killed in a 2015 Islamic State terrorist attack in Paris. The plaintiffs claimed that YouTube — which is owned by Google — knowingly permitted hundreds of radicalizing videos to be posted, and further
    alleged that YouTube recommended ISIS videos to users. Google argued that it’s exempted in this case by Section 230 — the powerful 1996 legislation that shields web and social media companies from legal liability for content posted by users.

    Google’s position was supported by a federal district court and the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court taking the case signals justices’ interest in weighing in on the landmark law, which remains a vital piece of legislation to
    protect small and medium-sized companies without deep pockets or armies of lawyers to fend off countless lawsuits. It gives companies broad leeway to moderate their sites at their discretion without liability and, most importantly, it enables startups to
    challenge established companies in the free market.

    [Continues...] https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-02-03/internet-supreme-court-case-google-section-230

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to Han Mann on Sat Feb 4 16:27:32 2023
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 11:22:27 AM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:13:34 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof
    (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you
    money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of
    these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning
    postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it
    is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many
    times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep
    the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members who reside abroad in the United States of America.
    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent.
    Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far
    as can be determined, his imperial majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services
    as representative of Royal Family members in the United States. Of which there no doubt are many.

    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not
    necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.

    Who by the way is, James Takayama? His name is Japanese. Perhaps he has some Chinese heritage?
    He obviously doesn't know Chow personally. Where is his evidence to support his aspersions? He claims
    to be on an outer island, but fails to specify. He does not live on the same island as Chow, and makes
    no assertion to have had any personal dealings with him at all.

    So, what is Takayama's hidden agenda?
    Op-Ed: Here’s how to reform the law that made the internet

    MARK WEINSTEIN
    FEB. 3, 2023

    The case was brought by the family of a woman killed in a 2015 Islamic State terrorist attack in Paris. The plaintiffs claimed that YouTube — which is owned by Google — knowingly permitted hundreds of radicalizing videos to be posted, and further
    alleged that YouTube recommended ISIS videos to users. Google argued that it’s exempted in this case by Section 230 — the powerful 1996 legislation that shields web and social media companies from legal liability for content posted by users.

    Google’s position was supported by a federal district court and the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court taking the case signals justices’ interest in weighing in on the landmark law, which remains a vital piece of legislation to
    protect small and medium-sized companies without deep pockets or armies of lawyers to fend off countless lawsuits. It gives companies broad leeway to moderate their sites at their discretion without liability and, most importantly, it enables startups to
    challenge established companies in the free market.

    [Continues...] https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-02-03/internet-supreme-court-case-google-section-230


    Just ask the people in the ancestral village of Chow's family in China about his visit.
    Even the police were respectful of his preaching the Gospel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Han Mann@21:1/5 to Han Mann on Sat Feb 4 16:24:56 2023
    On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 11:22:27 AM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 5:13:34 PM UTC-10, Han Mann wrote:
    On Saturday, January 19, 2002 at 5:15:39 PM UTC-10, James Takayama wrote:
    You ask for money for waht you claim to be legitiment charitys. Show proof
    (other then your little website) that you are legit. Post 3 references, people who will back you up over the phone for people who want to send you
    money. Just 3 people should be easy if what you say is true. <lc...@nospam.lava.net> wrote in message news:a2d5tb$oe2$3...@mochi.lava.net...
    I am not a fraud. Normal people knowing this would wonder who are all of
    these people damning me and for what reason. I certainly don't blame anyone, if they thought this way about all of the malicious and damning
    postings found in newsgroups against me.

    I am a good guy and I usually never attack other people. I respect other's posting and ideas. If I do not like someone's posting, I will never say anything hurtful against him or her. If I do attack someone, it
    is because that person had attacked me first...even then, there are many
    times, when I will not say anything against another person, so as to keep
    the peace.



    --
    Lester D. K. Chow and Associates, International Political Consultants and Conflict Resolution Specialists. http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html Official representative for China's Imperial family, for those members who reside abroad in the United States of America.
    After thorough investigation, evidence fully supports that Lester Chow is in fact the true heir apparent.
    Xi Jinping himself does not deny this, yet still refuses to abdicate control of China by the CCP. As far
    as can be determined, his imperial majesty does not seek charity for himself, rather offers his services
    as representative of Royal Family members in the United States. Of which there no doubt are many.

    I would caution that simply because someone might be considered to be a public figure, that does not
    necessarily mean that one can not be sued for slander and libel.

    Who by the way is, James Takayama? His name is Japanese. Perhaps he has some Chinese heritage?
    He obviously doesn't know Chow personally. Where is his evidence to support his aspersions? He claims
    to be on an outer island, but fails to specify. He does not live on the same island as Chow, and makes
    no assertion to have had any personal dealings with him at all.

    So, what is Takayama's hidden agenda?
    Op-Ed: Here’s how to reform the law that made the internet

    MARK WEINSTEIN
    FEB. 3, 2023

    The case was brought by the family of a woman killed in a 2015 Islamic State terrorist attack in Paris. The plaintiffs claimed that YouTube — which is owned by Google — knowingly permitted hundreds of radicalizing videos to be posted, and further
    alleged that YouTube recommended ISIS videos to users. Google argued that it’s exempted in this case by Section 230 — the powerful 1996 legislation that shields web and social media companies from legal liability for content posted by users.

    Google’s position was supported by a federal district court and the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court taking the case signals justices’ interest in weighing in on the landmark law, which remains a vital piece of legislation to
    protect small and medium-sized companies without deep pockets or armies of lawyers to fend off countless lawsuits. It gives companies broad leeway to moderate their sites at their discretion without liability and, most importantly, it enables startups to
    challenge established companies in the free market.

    [Continues...] https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-02-03/internet-supreme-court-case-google-section-230

    Just ask the people in the ancestral village of Chow's family in China about his visit.
    Even the police were respectful of his preaching preaching the Gospel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)