• Boston U. Panel Finds Plagiarism by Dr. King

    From Ronny Koch@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 16 14:08:56 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.conservative, alt.politics.democrats, alt.business
    XPost: dc.politics

    Published: October 11, 1991
    A committee of scholars appointed by Boston University concluded
    today that the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. plagiarized passages
    in his dissertation for a doctoral degree at the university 36
    years ago.

    "There is no question," the committee said in a report to the
    university's provost, "but that Dr. King plagiarized in the
    dissertation by appropriating material from sources not
    explicitly credited in notes, or mistakenly credited, or
    credited generally and at some distance in the text from a close
    paraphrase or verbatim quotation."

    Despite its finding, the committee said that "no thought should
    be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an
    action that the panel said would serve no purpose.

    But the committee did recommend that a letter stating its
    finding be placed with the official copy of Dr. King's
    dissertation in the university's library.

    The four-member committee was appointed by the university a year
    ago to determine whether plagiarism charges against Dr. King
    that had recently surfaced were in fact true. Today the
    university's provost, Jon Westling, accepted the committee's
    recommendations and said its members had "conducted the
    investigation with scholarly thoroughness, scrupulous attention
    to detail and a determination not to be influenced by non-
    scholarly consideration."


    The dissertation at issue is "A Comparison of the Conceptions of
    God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman."
    Dr. King wrote it in 1955 as part of his requirements for a
    doctor of philosophy degree, which he subsequently received from
    the university's Division of Religious and Theological Studies.

    One member of the investigating committee, John Cartwright, the
    university's Martin Luther King Professor of Social Ethics, said
    the panel had refrained from speculating about the reasons why
    Dr. King had not properly attributed material, which came from a
    variety of other interpreters of the works of Tillich and Wieman.

    http://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/11/us/boston-u-panel-finds- plagiarism-by-dr-king.html


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)