• Fallout from MLK, "When Black Shoplifting Is A Felony: Retailers Back H

    From Ronny Koch@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 16 11:43:18 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.conservative, alt.politics.democrats, alt.business
    XPost: dc.politics

    What exactly did Abbie Welch put in her purse before she snuck
    out of a Walmart in Knoxville, Tenn.? The court ruling doesn't
    say.

    Nor does it matter. What matters is a piece of paper she'd
    previously received from Walmart banning her from the store.
    Prosecutors used it to argue she was trespassing when she
    shoplifted. Her crime, typically a misdemeanor, was elevated to
    a burglary. She became a felon with a six-year sentence.

    Among the legal briefs cited by the Tennessee Supreme Court in
    this high-profile ruling in February is one from several retail
    groups — in support of the prosecution.

    Retailers have long kept a close eye on shoplifting laws around
    the country, warning of organized retail crime rings that are
    costing stores a lot of money. In an era of social-justice
    reckoning, their support of harsher shoplifting punishments and
    related laws faces new scrutiny from advocates who say this
    lobbying goes counter to the companies' public statements
    promoting racial and social equity.

    A new report by the consumer-interest nonprofit Public Citizen
    calls out major retailers — Best Buy, Lowe's, Home Depot,
    Target, Walmart and others — for donating to trade associations
    and campaigns promoting harsher shoplifting penalties in at
    least 18 states. The retailers succeeded in 11 of them,
    according to the report.

    "Corporations that embraced criminal justice reform rhetoric
    have been fueling mass incarceration," the report declares.
    Racial justice organization Color of Change plans to join Public
    Citizen in writing to top retailers and industry groups to
    demand they reverse course.

    One related measure is on the November ballot in California:
    Proposition 20 would toughen penalties for some theft-related
    crimes. Among its biggest backers is grocer Albertsons, parent
    of Safeway. Costco had previously donated to a campaign in favor
    but told NPR that the company has requested a return of its
    contribution and does not support the measure, without
    elaborating further.

    "People from across the political spectrum have come to realize
    that it's wasteful and ineffective to just ratchet up
    penalties," said Rick Claypool of Public Citizen, who authored
    the report. "I think there is an opportunity here for the
    retailers to change."

    The crime

    Claypool is typically a corporate-crime watchdog, but it was the
    Tennessee case that got him curious. The door he opened was to a
    convoluted web of state laws that decide the fate of people
    caught shoplifting — who gets harsher penalties and who doesn't
    — and the role that the stores can play when they lobby
    lawmakers or send security staff to testify in court.

    The retailers' targets are organized crime rings and repeat
    offenders, looking to profit from shoplifting, said Jason
    Straczewski, who oversees state-level advocacy and government
    relations at the National Retail Federation. "Retailers are not
    about filling the jails with tons of people who've stolen small-
    dollar amounts of goods," he said.

    The definition of "organized retail theft" changes by state.
    California's Prop 20, for example, describes it as at least two
    people shoplifting "in concert" at least twice in six months for
    a total value more than $250.

    The National Retail Federation doesn't "know where to draw the
    line" in defining organized retail crime, Straczewski said. But
    the trade group has called its impact as "considerable," costing
    retailers $703,320 per $1 billion in sales. Almost all the
    retailers polled by the trade group said they'd been hit by
    retail-theft "gangs" in the previous year. Top stolen items were
    designer clothes and handbags, infant formula, razors and
    laundry detergent.

    The culprit

    Home Depot made headlines last year when it said the nation's
    opioid epidemic was a big cause of "shrink" — a word retailers
    use when merchandise goes missing, whether stolen by employees
    or outsiders. Public defenders tend to describe shoplifting
    cases as crimes of poverty, drug abuse and mental illness.

    Thalia Karny had just moved from the Bronx to the όber-wealthy
    Manhattan as a public defender when she met Qulon McCain. He'd
    been caught stealing socks from Bloomingdale's, and like Welch
    in Tennessee faced a bumped-up felony charge because the store
    had given him a "trespass notice."

    McCain told her he was homeless. That he had mental illness.
    That he wanted to get better. He spent almost nine months in
    prison, she says, before finding a place in a mental-health
    treatment center.

    Karny had never seen such a case before. But they've cropped up
    in some states. A woman battling cancer was sentenced to at
    least 10 months in prison in Pennsylvania after stealing some
    $100 worth of groceries. A man in Tennessee was sentenced to 12
    years in prison after he faked the return of $39 worth of items
    he had taken off store shelves. A man in Arizona was charged
    with a felony after getting caught stealing items worth less
    than $10.

    Prosecutors point to the offenders' lengthy criminal histories
    as factors for their serious sentences. Public defenders say
    they are people trapped in the cycle of the criminal justice
    system.

    "Shoplifting may be a problem, an issue that needs to be dealt
    with, but in our society, the only answer we have apparently is
    — let's put people in prison for long periods of time," said
    Jonathan Harwell, a public defender in Tennessee known for his
    work on "Walmart burglary" cases. "We're the only country in the
    world that does it on the scale that we do it. It doesn't seem
    to be working, and it ruins people's lives. And why are we doing
    that?"

    The punishment

    The main way that retailers are pushing for harsher shoplifting
    punishments, according to Public Citizen, has to do with the
    dollar value that states use to determine whether an incident is
    a felony (typically punishable by over a year in prison) or a
    misdemeanor (typically punishable by less than a year in jail,
    often served on probation).

    In recent years, concerns about mass incarceration have pushed
    most states to raise the felony threshold. Many say, for
    example, that theft below $1,000 should be a misdemeanor. But
    disputes around these amounts persist.

    Retail trade groups have argued that prosecutors should be able
    to aggregate shoplifting incidents to crack down on repeat
    offenders. With the same goal, the groups in many states have
    lobbied in favor of lower thresholds for the value of stolen
    property that triggers a felony charge.

    Opponents of higher felony thresholds argue they encourage more
    shoplifting because organized groups can simply adjust to
    stealing more valuable items without fear of facing stiffer
    charges. In recent years, the Pew Charitable Trusts studied
    states that raised their thresholds and reported that property
    crime rates were falling before the change and continued to fall
    afterward.

    The National Retail Federation's 2020 security survey found that
    shoplifting apprehensions and prosecutions have fallen
    dramatically since 2015. Meanwhile, the average loss per each
    shoplifting incident declined only slightly to $270. According
    to the Insurance Information Institute, most insurance policies
    do not cover shoplifting but can cover burglaries.

    Something major is getting lost in all of this, says Pew's Jake
    Horowitz. If the goal is to deter crime, tougher punishment is
    actually not the best approach.

    "This may surprise some folks, but it's one of the least
    controversial ideas among people who study crime," Horowitz
    says. More severe punishments are expensive, costing taxpayers,
    but he says severity is "essentially meaningless" compared with
    the most important factor: certainty of punishment.

    "Research shows clearly that the chance of being caught is a
    vastly more effective deterrent than even draconian punishment,"
    says the National Institute of Justice, an agency of the U.S.
    Justice Department. "Prison sentences (particularly long
    sentences) are unlikely to deter future crime. Prisons actually
    may have the opposite effect."

    Editor's Note: Target and Walmart are among NPR's recent
    financial supporters.

    NPR's Will Chase contributed to this report.

    https://www.npr.org/2020/10/16/923844907/when-shoplifting-is-a- felony-retailers-back-harsher-penalties-for-store-theft
     

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)