1) Who is God?
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Dawn
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Dawn
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Dawn
1) Who is God?
Anthropologists estimate that at least 18,000 different gods, goddesses, and various animals or objects have been worshipped by humans since our species first appeared. Today, it is estimated that more than 80 percent of the global population considers themselves religious or spiritual in some form.
On Jan 20, 2024, Dawn Flood wrote
(in article <uoh2gv$3pavv$1@dont-email.me>):
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Dawn
Any amputee that is alive, and not bleeding to death, is healed, else
their wounds would all be open festering sores. What about the youth?
You specified only adults?
If you were shown one or more adults would you be satisfied?
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Dawn
On 2024-01-20 13:13, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Because whatever you can imagine has nothing to do with God.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Dawn
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Dawn
It doesn't work that way Dummy. God never does anything.
That's his thing.
In article <uohbu8$3qd17$5@dont-email.me>, jeo@somewhere.org says...
On 2024-01-20 13:13, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Because whatever you can imagine has nothing to do with God.
They always overlook the part when we brought sin into the world that
things were not going to be perfect. That is why we have cancer and
such. Our choice how to live.
On 2024-01-20 17:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uohbu8$3qd17$5@dont-email.me>, jeo@somewhere.org says...
On 2024-01-20 13:13, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Because whatever you can imagine has nothing to do with God.
They always overlook the part when we brought sin into the world that things were not going to be perfect. That is why we have cancer and
such. Our choice how to live.
Their way to look for God is always through their stupid imagination out
of their arrogance, and they are wonderfully surprised why they can't
find him.
:-)
In article <uoho1f$3skn7$1@dont-email.me>, jeo@somewhere.org says...
On 2024-01-20 17:20, Skeeter wrote:
In article <uohbu8$3qd17$5@dont-email.me>, jeo@somewhere.org says...
On 2024-01-20 13:13, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Because whatever you can imagine has nothing to do with God.
They always overlook the part when we brought sin into the world that
things were not going to be perfect. That is why we have cancer and
such. Our choice how to live.
Their way to look for God is always through their stupid imagination out
of their arrogance, and they are wonderfully surprised why they can't
find him.
:-)
They would like there to be a God but only if He does things their way.
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
"Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:uoh2gv$3pavv$1@dont-email.me...
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Dawn
Since you know that He is, trust that He will do that in His timing.
The Bible specifically tells us when that will be. (1 Corinthians 15)
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:07:58 +1100, Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> wrote:
1) Who is God?An imaginary character invented by humans to explain
to explain their existence and things in nature they didn't
understand.
2) What is God?Nothing more then a humanly fabricated fantasy.
3) Why is God?Out of need for humans to feel like there's a big daddy in the
sky watching out for them.
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.No. We originated from natural processes occurring over billions of
years. No "creator" is needed.
2) God is everything."God" is nothing.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.No. Your god does nothing, fixes nothing and never makes an
appearence to provide guidance and support.
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
Because we're expected to do so ourselves?
It's the struggle that makes us stronger.
~~ Ralph Selover
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
There is no justification for the belief that the designer(God) is a micro-manager. The evidence suggest the designer "simply set things in motion" and left the scene.
For example: reproduction! Maybe the designer could have created each
and every living thing as death occurred. But it had other things that
needed it's attention. It designed life to take care of itself via reproduction. A unique capability. There is nothing other than life that
can reproduce highly complex matter such as the living cell.
Furthermore, it's virtually impossible for highly complex information necessary for the first living cell came through random, purposeless and mindless processes. In each and ever known case of highly complex
information a mind was always at play. This fact alone cast doubt as to naturalism in the origin of information in living cells.
Apart from living systems there is no other equally complex processes
that ever arose naturally. And this too cast doubt on naturalism as the originator of life's complexity.
On 2/28/2024 4:21 PM, Michael Christ wrote:
On 29/02/2024 6:17 am, Ron Dean wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:There is no justification for the belief that the designer(God) is a
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
micro-manager. The evidence suggest the designer "simply set things
in motion" and left the scene.
If God left the scene there would be no scene.
For example: reproduction! Maybe the designer could have created each
and every living thing as death occurred. But it had other things
that needed it's attention. It designed life to take care of itself
via reproduction. A unique capability. There is nothing other than
life that can reproduce highly complex matter such as the living
cell. Furthermore, it's virtually impossible for highly complex
information necessary for the first living cell came through random,
purposeless and mindless processes. In each and ever known case of
highly complex information a mind was always at play. This fact alone
cast doubt as to naturalism in the origin of information in living
cells.
Apart from living systems there is no other equally complex
processes that ever arose naturally. And this too cast doubt on
naturalism as the originator of life's complexity.
Well, no thing can create itself.
You're equivocating; the Universe is not a "thing".
Once again,
Michael, think about the expansion of our Universe (that is, the
increasing distance between objects on intergalactic scales); what is
the Universe expanding "into"?
On 29/02/2024 2:31 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 2/28/2024 4:21 PM, Michael Christ wrote:
On 29/02/2024 6:17 am, Ron Dean wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:There is no justification for the belief that the designer(God) is a
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
micro-manager. The evidence suggest the designer "simply set things
in motion" and left the scene.
If God left the scene there would be no scene.
For example: reproduction! Maybe the designer could have created each
and every living thing as death occurred. But it had other things
that needed it's attention. It designed life to take care of itself
via reproduction. A unique capability. There is nothing other than
life that can reproduce highly complex matter such as the living
cell. Furthermore, it's virtually impossible for highly complex
information necessary for the first living cell came through random,
purposeless and mindless processes. In each and ever known case of
highly complex information a mind was always at play. This fact alone
cast doubt as to naturalism in the origin of information in living
cells.
Apart from living systems there is no other equally complex
processes that ever arose naturally. And this too cast doubt on
naturalism as the originator of life's complexity.
Well, no thing can create itself.
You're equivocating; the Universe is not a "thing".
What a load of bullshit! Of course "it" is!
So, what name would you like to give your him or her? Harry or Harriet?
Once again,
Michael, think about the expansion of our Universe (that is, the
increasing distance between objects on intergalactic scales); what is
the Universe expanding "into"?
Harry or Harriet is growing.
Like we all do, growing in God. We don't speak about your butt expanding
into non-existence, it is more scientific to say it is growing. And
things don't grow unless they have something to grow into.
The universe is not creating itself, Dawn; no thing can create itself.
You are a very stubborn stiff-necked person and the day you die you are
going to learn you f%#ked up. The universe is a thing, and things can't create themselves.
Simple.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:50:20 +1100
Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> wrote:
On 29/02/2024 2:31 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 2/28/2024 4:21 PM, Michael Christ wrote:
On 29/02/2024 6:17 am, Ron Dean wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:There is no justification for the belief that the designer(God) is a >>>>> micro-manager. The evidence suggest the designer "simply set things
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
in motion" and left the scene.
If God left the scene there would be no scene.
For example: reproduction! Maybe the designer could have created each >>>>> and every living thing as death occurred. But it had other things
that needed it's attention. It designed life to take care of itself
via reproduction. A unique capability. There is nothing other than
life that can reproduce highly complex matter such as the living
cell. Furthermore, it's virtually impossible for highly complex
information necessary for the first living cell came through random, >>>>> purposeless and mindless processes. In each and ever known case of
highly complex information a mind was always at play. This fact alone >>>>> cast doubt as to naturalism in the origin of information in living
cells.
Apart from living systems there is no other equally complex
processes that ever arose naturally. And this too cast doubt on
naturalism as the originator of life's complexity.
Well, no thing can create itself.
You're equivocating; the Universe is not a "thing".
What a load of bullshit! Of course "it" is!
Actually, the universe is part of the cosmos, which
also isn't a thing (by the way).
So, what name would you like to give your him or her? Harry or Harriet?
The universe does have a name: The universe.
Once again,
Michael, think about the expansion of our Universe (that is, the
increasing distance between objects on intergalactic scales); what is
the Universe expanding "into"?
Harry or Harriet is growing.
Like we all do, growing in God. We don't speak about your butt expanding
into non-existence, it is more scientific to say it is growing. And
things don't grow unless they have something to grow into.
You're obviously thinking of the effects of a crappy
fast-food diet complemented by an unhealthy lifestyle.
Wow, that's actually a nice try at a diversion tactic
on your part, but it isn't going to work because most
people here easily see through what you're preaching.
The universe is not creating itself, Dawn; no thing can create itself.
You are a very stubborn stiff-necked person and the day you die you are
going to learn you f%#ked up. The universe is a thing, and things can't
create themselves.
She didn't claim the universe created itself, and
she did already explain to you that the universe
isn't a thing.
Simple.
If your argument truly was simple, your god would
not be part of the equation.
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:11:09 -0800, Randolf Richardson ??? <randolf@canadianatheists.ca>
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:50:20 +1100<snip>
Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> wrote:
On 29/02/2024 2:31 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:
Once again,
Michael, think about the expansion of our Universe (that is, the
increasing distance between objects on intergalactic scales); what is
the Universe expanding "into"?
Harry or Harriet is growing.
Like we all do, growing in God. We don't speak about your butt expanding >>> into non-existence, it is more scientific to say it is growing. And
things don't grow unless they have something to grow into.
You're obviously thinking of the effects of a crappy
fast-food diet complemented by an unhealthy lifestyle.
Wow, that's actually a nice try at a diversion tactic
on your part, but it isn't going to work because most
people here easily see through what you're preaching.
The universe is not creating itself, Dawn; no thing can create itself.
You are a very stubborn stiff-necked person and the day you die you are
going to learn you f%#ked up. The universe is a thing, and things can't
create themselves.
She didn't claim the universe created itself, and
she did already explain to you that the universe
isn't a thing.
Simple.
If your argument truly was simple, your god would
not be part of the equation.
ZING!
Swill
On 1/03/2024 8:11 am, Randolf Richardson 張文道 wrote:
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:50:20 +1100
Michael Christ <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> wrote:
On 29/02/2024 2:31 pm, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 2/28/2024 4:21 PM, Michael Christ wrote:
On 29/02/2024 6:17 am, Ron Dean wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/20/2024 1:07 AM, Michael Christ wrote:There is no justification for the belief that the designer(God) is a >>>>> micro-manager. The evidence suggest the designer "simply set things >>>>> in motion" and left the scene.
1) Who is God?
2) What is God?
3) Why is God?
1) God is your Creator, the One who gave you life.
2) God is everything.
3) God is purpose, meaning, reason for everything.
Why won't God instantaneously heal one or more adult amputees?
If God left the scene there would be no scene.
For example: reproduction! Maybe the designer could have created each >>>>> and every living thing as death occurred. But it had other things
that needed it's attention. It designed life to take care of itself >>>>> via reproduction. A unique capability. There is nothing other than >>>>> life that can reproduce highly complex matter such as the living
cell. Furthermore, it's virtually impossible for highly complex
information necessary for the first living cell came through random, >>>>> purposeless and mindless processes. In each and ever known case of >>>>> highly complex information a mind was always at play. This fact alone >>>>> cast doubt as to naturalism in the origin of information in living >>>>> cells.
Apart from living systems there is no other equally complex
processes that ever arose naturally. And this too cast doubt on
naturalism as the originator of life's complexity.
Well, no thing can create itself.
You're equivocating; the Universe is not a "thing".
What a load of bullshit! Of course "it" is!
Actually, the universe is part of the cosmos, which
also isn't a thing (by the way).
Cosmos, universe, whatever you want to call it, it is a thing.
"It" can't understand what hurt and love is x a million other aspects of personal human existence.
You atheists are silly children trying to build reality in a sand pit.
So, what name would you like to give your him or her? Harry or Harriet?
The universe does have a name: The universe.
Grow up.
Once again,
Michael, think about the expansion of our Universe (that is, the
increasing distance between objects on intergalactic scales); what is
the Universe expanding "into"?
Harry or Harriet is growing.
Like we all do, growing in God. We don't speak about your butt expanding >> into non-existence, it is more scientific to say it is growing. And
things don't grow unless they have something to grow into.
You're obviously thinking of the effects of a crappy
fast-food diet complemented by an unhealthy lifestyle.
Clap, clap, clap.
Wow, that's actually a nice try at a diversion tactic
on your part, but it isn't going to work because most
people here easily see through what you're preaching.
Preach it, Brother! :-).
The universe is not creating itself, Dawn; no thing can create itself.
You are a very stubborn stiff-necked person and the day you die you are
going to learn you f%#ked up. The universe is a thing, and things can't
create themselves.
She didn't claim the universe created itself, and
she did already explain to you that the universe
isn't a thing.
Bullshit. All Dawn did was say it wasn't a thing. :-). Great, you can believe her "explanation!" :-).
Simple.
If your argument truly was simple, your god would
not be part of the equation.
:-). Well, it must be so then.
You are a self-worshiping, self-righteous, prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own.
A self-aggrandizing bigot. Other than that, you're great.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 302 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 81:31:21 |
Calls: | 6,762 |
Files: | 12,289 |
Messages: | 5,378,185 |