• Observations On The NeverTrump Section 3 Big Lie Push

    From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 29 11:30:07 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/12/29/observations-on-the-nevertrump-section-3-big-lie-push/


    Observations On The NeverTrump Section 3 Big Lie Push
    DECEMBER 29, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL


    Maine joined Colorado in barring from its GOP primary ballot yesterday,
    as Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) decided that she “had no choice.” She had no choice because she is a rapid partisan Leftist who,
    like many Democratic operatives in various positions of power within the legal establishment, she is determined that President Biden be rescued
    from his election peril by any means necessary. Trump’s actions before
    and during the January 6, 2021, riot in the U.S. Capitol do not justify charging him with inciting a riot, much less an “insurrection” that
    would trigger Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Maine’s completely
    partisan and anti-democratic move is sure to be appealed along with
    Colorado Supreme Court’s finding last week that Trump could not appear
    on the ballot in that state under the 14th Amendment provision designed
    to keep members of the Confederacy that prevents insurrectionists from
    holding office. The U.S. Supreme Court will review the case, one hopes
    quickly, and had better resolve the issue of whether Trump can run again
    or if the nation will be thrown into Constitutional chaos by allowing
    some states to block him.


    SCOTUS could, if John Roberts is overcome with one of his weenie
    attacks, decide the case narrowly without getting to the merits of the NeverTrump 14th Amendment Big Lie. Because it is a Big Lie, one of many
    that the Left has tried to use to bring down Trump before, while he was President and ever since, that it has reached this stage is horrifying,
    and I say that as someone who profoundly hopes for some legal and fair
    way to take Trump out of the 2024 election. This isn’t it. Like the two impeachments and the unethical Nancy Pelosi-Liz Cheney January 6 Star
    Chamber in the House, the Maine and Colorado actions are far more
    serious attacks on the nation’s democacy than the stupid, futile,
    January 6 rioting.

    Jonathan Turley outlined as clearly as anyone has why the Section 3
    application to Trump is untenable and dangerous. There are two main
    reasons. The first is that the 14th Amendment, like the Emoluments
    Clause that the Axis [the “resistance,” Democrats and the media] dredged out of the dead letter pond in one of its potential impeachment
    theories, is a narrow and archaic provision that has never been used
    except in the specific instances it was designed for: when former
    members of the Confederacy wanted to run for office after the Civil War.
    The second is that there was no insurrection in 2021, and so Trump
    cannot be labeled an insurrectionist.

    The apparently officially-sanctioned Democratic Party talking point is
    that since Section 3 of the 14th requires no official finding that an individual is an insurrectionist, there is no Due Process breach to
    disqualify Trump without any trial on the question. In other words, the
    Axis thinks that its simply calling the Capitol riot an insurrection
    repeatedly makes it an insurrection. That’s a Big Lie purveyor’s dream: repeat it enough, and it’s true. When he 14th Amendment was passed,
    there was no crime of “insurrection,” and no definition of it in the Constitution. There didn’t need to be, because a civil war is by
    definition an insurrection, and that’s what Section 3 was about: the
    Civil War just completed. Congress made rebellion and/or insurrection a
    federal crime with 18 USC 2383 in 1948, so now there is something other
    than the Civil War to use to trigger Section 3. Trump, however, hasn’t
    been charged with violating 18 USC 2383, because he didn’t, and no prosecutor, even Jack Smith, Trump’s own personal Javert, is foolish
    enough to charge him. (I would view doing so as an ethics violation
    justifying bar sanctions.) The Democrats who desperately want to stop
    American from having the chance to vote for Trump have decided he is an insurrectionist because they have been saying so for three years. That’s
    it. That’s their case.

    If the Colorado and Maine ruling stands, it will create a situation in
    which any politician who is sufficiently unpopular and controversial
    could be banned from the ballots of states with an unethical and
    partisan Supreme Court. As others have noted, the concerted efforts to
    use extralegal means to undermine Trump’s Presidency was far closer to
    an insurrection than the actions of the drunken mob on January 6, 2021.

    It profoundly depressed me to read Scalia Law School’s Ilya Somin‘s
    support for the bogus insurrection theory. He’s a constitutional
    scholar, but now heads my Bias Makes You Stupid victims list. Somin’s argument is tortured at best, and he never makes a convincing case that
    the Capitol riot qualifies as an insurrection. A Harvard study found
    that most of the January 6 rioters were not trying to overthrow the
    government, but to express their anger and disapproval over what they
    felt was an unfair election and to support President Trump, whom they
    believed was the victim of it.

    Of course, that’s a study from an institution that is itself lacking in integrity and trustworthiness…

    Once the dangerous Section 3 conspiracy is derailed for good by the
    Supreme Court (and in stating it this way I am channeling the Hickory
    high school basketball coach played by Gene Hackman in “Hoosiers,” when
    he tells a shaky sub at a crucial point in a must-win game, “After Ollie makes his free throw—and you WILL make your second free throw—“), the American public is likely to be faced with a terrible choice: vote for a vengeance-obsessed man who has proven himself untrustworthy and unstable
    as a crucial symbolic vote against the Democratic Party that has
    demonstrated hostility to the Constitution and the rule of law, or vote
    for a mentally-collapsing President whose first term has been a disaster
    across the board and his political party that is now hostile to both the Constitution and core American values.

    It’s a crummy choice, but voters have a right to make it, and only one
    party is trying to take the right away. I think that by itself makes the responsible choice clear.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Loose Cannon@21:1/5 to MEjercit@HotMail.com on Fri Dec 29 16:06:22 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa

    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:30:07 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/12/29/observations-on-the-nevertrump-section-3-big-lie-push/


    Observations On The NeverTrump Section 3 Big Lie Push
    DECEMBER 29, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL




    Who gives a shit what some ape with a typewriter has to say? You're
    not eligible to vote, so why do you care?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to Loose Cannon on Fri Dec 29 16:28:22 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:30:07 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/12/29/observations-on-the-nevertrump-section-3-big-lie-push/


    Observations On The NeverTrump Section 3 Big Lie Push
    DECEMBER 29, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL




    Who gives a shit what some ape with a typewriter has to say?
    Mangina, normal people do!

    You're
    not eligible to vote, so why do you care?


    I am definitely eligible to vote.

    You are a Nazi.

    As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

    You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
    can not measure up.

    You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
    betters.

    You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
    tell it.

    You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
    out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National Socialism.

    Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
    Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
    as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
    helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
    hospital.

    That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
    about it.


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Loose Cannon@21:1/5 to MEjercit@HotMail.com on Fri Dec 29 23:54:26 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa

    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 16:28:22 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:30:07 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/12/29/observations-on-the-nevertrump-section-3-big-lie-push/


    Observations On The NeverTrump Section 3 Big Lie Push
    DECEMBER 29, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL


    Who gives a shit what some ape with a typewriter has to say?
    Mangina, normal people do!

    Normal people are White. They are the only ones who count, and they
    don't care what some wide-nostril yard ape thinks about politics (or
    anything else for that matter)



    You're
    not eligible to vote, so why do you care?


    I am definitely eligible to vote.


    No you are not. One must be a United States citizen; something you
    clearly are not.


    You are a Nazi.


    You are a repetitive dunce. Find something new.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to Loose Cannon on Sun Dec 31 09:43:24 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 16:28:22 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:30:07 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/12/29/observations-on-the-nevertrump-section-3-big-lie-push/


    Observations On The NeverTrump Section 3 Big Lie Push
    DECEMBER 29, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL


    Who gives a shit what some ape with a typewriter has to say?
    Mangina, normal people do!

    Normal people are White.
    Nithing, plenty of normal people are not White.

    They are the only ones who count, and they
    don't care what some wide-nostril yard ape thinks about politics (or
    anything else for that matter)
    What the fuck is a yard ape?

    Someone better than you?



    You're
    not eligible to vote, so why do you care?


    I am definitely eligible to vote.


    No you are not.
    Yes, I am.

    One must be a United States citizen; something you
    clearly are not.
    I have always been a United States citizen!



    You are a Nazi.


    You are a repetitive dunce. Find something new.

    You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
    key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
    rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

    Bill explains what nithings are.

    http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

    Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

    by Bill Levinson
    It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
    knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
    person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
    psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
    that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
    argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence against civilians as “resistance.”

    We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
    humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
    worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
    English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
    describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
    word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
    nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity. Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
    term of utmost opprobrium.”

    We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
    supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
    Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
    come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
    dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
    beings.
    nithings

    Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
    become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
    recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

    The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
    earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
    obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
    known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
    was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
    retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
    back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
    cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

    A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
    enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
    supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
    degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
    tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
    is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
    carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
    and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
    nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
    Humanity.

    The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
    outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
    for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
    German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
    kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
    but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
    kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

    The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
    complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
    transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
    sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
    Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
    “The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
    and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
    to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

    "Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’ destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and “unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
    perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
    to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
    in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
    enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
    total antithesis of God the Creator.

    The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
    alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
    directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
    matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
    make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
    that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
    than any man can build.

    This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
    comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
    is possible.

    In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
    subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
    its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
    toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
    extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
    apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
    others to do likewise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Loose Cannon@21:1/5 to MEjercit@HotMail.com on Mon Jan 1 16:07:08 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa

    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:43:24 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 16:28:22 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:30:07 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/12/29/observations-on-the-nevertrump-section-3-big-lie-push/


    Observations On The NeverTrump Section 3 Big Lie Push
    DECEMBER 29, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL


    Who gives a shit what some ape with a typewriter has to say?
    Mangina, normal people do!

    Normal people are White.
    Nithing, plenty of normal people are not White.

    If they're not White, they're not normal



    They are the only ones who count, and they
    don't care what some wide-nostril yard ape thinks about politics (or
    anything else for that matter)
    What the fuck is a yard ape?

    Jack Marshall and Chrissie Morton are yard apes.

    1997, Lewis R. Gordon, Existence in Black:
    American racists often refer to blacks as "niggers," "coons," "porch
    monkeys," "jungle bunnies," and "yard apes."



    Someone better than you?



    You're
    not eligible to vote, so why do you care?


    I am definitely eligible to vote.


    No you are not.
    Yes, I am.

    One must be a United States citizen; something you
    clearly are not.
    I have always been a United States citizen!

    When did you become a citizen? I haven't heard anything about a
    blanket amnesty. ICE will track you down and you can plead your case
    to the crew on the boat taking you back home to Philippines.




    You are a Nazi.


    You are a repetitive dunce. Find something new.

    You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
    key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
    rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

    You had NO CHOICE when you were excreted as a gook. That is very sad
    indeed. It must suck being you, knowing that whatever you do in life,
    you'll never measure up to a White person


    Bill explains what nithings are.

    http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

    Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

    by Bill Levinson

    If I have no interest in what your nigger buddy writes, what make you
    think I'd give a heaping shit about what some kike says?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to Loose Cannon on Mon Jan 1 17:21:56 2024
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:43:24 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 16:28:22 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    Loose Cannon wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:30:07 -0800, Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/12/29/observations-on-the-nevertrump-section-3-big-lie-push/


    Observations On The NeverTrump Section 3 Big Lie Push
    DECEMBER 29, 2023 / JACK MARSHALL


    Who gives a shit what some ape with a typewriter has to say?
    Mangina, normal people do!

    Normal people are White.
    Nithing, plenty of normal people are not White.

    If they're not White, they're not normal
    Plenty of non=White people are normal.




    They are the only ones who count, and they
    don't care what some wide-nostril yard ape thinks about politics (or
    anything else for that matter)
    What the fuck is a yard ape?

    Jack Marshall and Chrissie Morton are yard apes.

    1997, Lewis R. Gordon, Existence in Black:
    American racists often refer to blacks as "niggers," "coons," "porch monkeys," "jungle bunnies," and "yard apes."



    Someone better than you?



    You're
    not eligible to vote, so why do you care?


    I am definitely eligible to vote.


    No you are not.
    Yes, I am.

    One must be a United States citizen; something you
    clearly are not.
    I have always been a United States citizen!

    When did you become a citizen? I haven't heard anything about a
    blanket amnesty. ICE will track you down and you can plead your case
    to the crew on the boat taking you back home to Philippines.




    You are a Nazi.


    You are a repetitive dunce. Find something new.

    You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
    key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
    rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

    You had NO CHOICE when you were excreted as a gook. That is very sad
    indeed. It must suck being you, knowing that whatever you do in life,
    you'll never measure up to a White person


    Bill explains what nithings are.

    http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

    Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

    by Bill Levinson

    If I have no interest in what your nigger buddy writes, what make you
    think I'd give a heaping shit about what some kike says?

    Because he is better than you.

    The following article explains your pathology.



    http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/


    History's oldest hatred
    By Jeff Jacoby
    Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
    Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

    ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
    it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
    Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
    Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
    had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

    Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
    "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
    their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
    being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
    live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
    while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
    'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
    been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
    who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
    together spark hatred for remaining separate."

    There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
    Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
    week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
    read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
    Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
    Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
    empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

    "There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
    other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
    benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
    written that they be destroyed."

    When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
    destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
    one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

    What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
    lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
    empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
    nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
    later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
    or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
    Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
    are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
    because Jews deserve to be victimized.

    Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
    is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
    object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
    rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
    contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
    common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
    an irrational obsession with Jews.

    At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
    family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
    and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
    Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
    to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
    That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
    in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
    undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

    Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
    focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
    sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
    the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

    With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
    in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
    as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.
    Spamming/forging jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' ZACHARY SHEIN's profile
    photo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)