XPost: soc.culture.israel, soc.culture.jewish, soc.culture.usa
XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:35:49 GMT, flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:

On 28-Jul-2008, drahcir <suedoe2@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Jul 26, 9:11 pm, semusim <semu...@usa.com> wrote:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/mapstellstory.html

How does a defensive action result in the total conquest of someone
else's lands?

Answer: Let's say Countries B,C,D... attack country A. Let's say, just
for the sake of argument, that the population of Country A is highly
intelligent and resourceful, and those of countries B,C,D....have
superior numbers and equipment and are full of bravura but have little
else. Well, after a few days of fighting it becomes clear that Country
A is not only defending herself, but is winning territory, just like
countries at war have done throughout history. A case in point might
be the arab conquests, the difference being that the arab conquests
were completely aggressive in nature. Does that answer your question?

It's amazing how atupid some people are.
I am sure that even if you dumbed it down to: "The country attacked
fought back so well that it won territory", it still will not sink in to the

tiny brain that posed the "question" in the first place. Just like the
fact that even the UN has to uphold the righteousness of the
ownership, since it's well within international rules of warfare.

Susan

https://i.postimg.cc/FssdGbF5/motto.jpg

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)