• =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Eric_Nam_cancels_Malaysia_concert_over_=e2=80=98threa?= =

    From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 2 09:49:07 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: soc.culture.israel, uk.legal

    spamming/forging jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' ZACHARY SHEIN wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 19:24:41 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    spamming/forging jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' ZACHARY SHEIN wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 10:41:05 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    Mangina, his eye shape is beside the point.

    Gook, his eye shape is like TOTALLY the point and DEFINES him as
    subhuman.
    Not by any normnal definition.

    By the WHITE (aka Human) definition, which is the only normnal one
    that matters.
    Skin color is a superficial characteristic.


    Normal people care.

    No, they do NOT...only gooks like you do.
    Nithing, you have no credibility about the behavior and customs of
    normal humanity.

    YOU only have credibility about the behaviour and customs of subnormal subhumanity such as yourself.
    You are the subnormal one here!


    You are a Nazi.

    You are a gook.
    That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

    It cannot POSSIBY be, gook...you're a shitskinned gook and I'm WHITE.

    <inane repetition b'rissed>



    Skin color is superficial.


    The following article explains your pathology.






    http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/


    History's oldest hatred
    By Jeff Jacoby
    Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
    Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

    ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
    it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
    Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
    Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
    had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

    Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
    "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
    their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
    being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
    live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
    while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
    'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
    been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
    who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
    together spark hatred for remaining separate."

    There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
    Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
    week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
    read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
    Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
    Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
    empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

    "There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
    other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
    benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
    written that they be destroyed."

    When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
    destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
    one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

    What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
    lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
    empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
    nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
    later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
    or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
    Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
    are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
    because Jews deserve to be victimized.

    Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
    is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
    object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
    rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
    contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
    common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
    an irrational obsession with Jews.

    At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
    family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
    and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
    Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
    to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
    That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
    in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
    undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

    Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
    focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
    sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
    the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

    With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
    in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
    as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From spamming/forging jew paedophile BAR@21:1/5 to MEjercit@HotMail.com on Thu Nov 2 19:20:07 2023
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: soc.culture.israel, uk.legal

    On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 09:49:07 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    spamming/forging jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' ZACHARY SHEIN wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 19:24:41 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    spamming/forging jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' ZACHARY SHEIN wrote:
    On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 10:41:05 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

    Mangina, his eye shape is beside the point.

    Gook, his eye shape is like TOTALLY the point and DEFINES him as
    subhuman.
    Not by any normnal definition.

    By the WHITE (aka Human) definition, which is the only normnal one
    that matters.
    Skin color is a superficial characteristic.

    Skin colour distinguishes Humanity (me) from subhumanity (you), gook.


    Normal people care.

    No, they do NOT...only gooks like you do.
    Nithing, you have no credibility about the behavior and customs of
    normal humanity.

    YOU only have credibility about the behaviour and customs of subnormal
    subhumanity such as yourself.
    You are the subnormal one here!

    Look in the g-ddam mirror (if any), gook. Does that BLANK minded
    shitskin looking back at you look NORMAL?

    <inane repetition b'rissed>

    --

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
    no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
    "Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
    Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$hp7.96925@fx13.fr7>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
    Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
    been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
    Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$Qr2.32934@fx08.fr7>

    Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
    thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
    the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
    Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$Nl5.48106@newsfe07.iad>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
    he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
    me first, poor psycho! LOL"
    Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$c56.0@fx32.fr7>

    The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
    about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
    like that he'd get my fist in his face."
    Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$1@gioia.aioe.org>

    And AGAIN: "YOU sick pedo swine and ridiculous overt sexual cripple certainly won't EVER
    get past any of us! This is a PROMISE, our pedophilic punching bag! LOL: Message-ID: <178eb1f58212ab1a$16$2903823$49d319de@news.newsdemon.com>

    In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
    STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
    "What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
    would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
    around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
    the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
    Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$YG3.18805@usenetxs.com>

    Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity, 'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)