[continued from previous message]

*DEFECTIVE*, *FRAIL*, *UNCERTAIN*; 2) true, veracious, sincere;

    /     #234 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER / 16 DECEMBER as [#6, #1, #2, #200, #20, #5] / [#6, #2, #200, #6, #500] /
#228 as [#2, #200, #6, #500] / [#2, #200, #20, #6] /
    #258 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER as [#6, #10, #2, #200,
#20, #500] / [#6, #30, #2, #200, #500] /
    #264 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER as [#6, #30, #2, #200,
#20, #6] /
    #269 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER as [#6, #1, #2, #200,
#20, #600] /
    #284 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 DECEMBER as [#6, #50, #2, #200,
#20, #6] = bârak (H1288): {UMBRA: #222 % #41 = #17} 1) to bless, kneel;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to kneel; 1a2) to bless; 1b) (Niphal) to be *BLESSED*,
bless oneself; 1c) (Piel) to bless; 1d) (Pual) to be blessed, be adored;
1e) (Hiphil) to cause to kneel; 1f) (Hithpael) to bless oneself; 2)
(TWOT) to praise, salute, curse;

#228 as [#10, #200, #1, #6, #5, #6] /
    #246 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER as [#30, #10, #200, #1,
#5] /
    #257 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER as [#50, #6, #200, #1] /
    #273 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 DECEMBER as [#6, #10, #200, #1,
#6, #700] /
    #301 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER as [#40, #10, #200, #1, #10, #600] / [#30, #10, #200, #1, #50, #10] = yârêʼ (H3372): {UMBRA:
#211 % #41 = #6} 1) to fear, revere, be afraid; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO*
*FEAR*, *BE* *AFRAID*; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be
dreadful, be feared; 1b2) to cause astonishment and awe, be held in awe;
1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c) (Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour;

In this storm, the façade of those stereotypes with which we camouflaged
our egos (ie. @215 - SELF CONTRADICTION), always worrying about our
image, has fallen away, uncovering once more that (#228 - *BLESSED*)
common belonging, of which we cannot be deprived: our belonging as
brothers and sisters.

“Why are you #228 = *AFRAID*? Have you no faith?” Lord, your word this evening strikes us and regards us, all of us. In this world, that you
love more than we do, we have gone ahead at breakneck speed, feeling
powerful and able to do anything. Greedy for profit (ie. @102 -
RAPACIOUSNESS), we let ourselves get caught up in things, and lured away
by haste. We did not stop at your reproach to us, we were not shaken
awake by wars or injustice across the world, nor did we listen to the
cry of the poor or of our ailing planet. We carried on regardless,
thinking we would stay healthy in a world that was sick. Now that we are
in a stormy sea, we implore you: “Wake up, Lord!”. [@5]

CENTRE [#65, #41, #17 CE to #2017 (#371)] ELEMENTS OF THE #71 -
*DOMINION* MATRIX ARRAY

#297 - (#67 - Three Treasures)

#297 - MAGIC SUM TO ROMAN PROTOTYPE ONE

#41 #1 #57
#49 #33 #17
#9 #65 #25
= #99 / #297 {#ONE}

    #301 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER as [#6, #90, #200, #5] /
    #303 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 SEPTEMBER as [#6, #2, #90, #200, #5] /
#297 as [#2, #90, #200, #5] = tsârâh (H6869): {UMBRA: #295 % #41 = #8}
1) straits, distress, trouble; 2) *VEXER*, rival wife;

Which involves a matter of metaphysical temporal aggregations: 1 x 4 day
/ 7 x 6 day to the JEWISH yearly cycle and the POWERS (6TH / #75 -
FAILURE (SHIH)) template (ie. as shown below) were considerations
initially raised within the COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 determined on 9 DECEMBER 2019 against ORDERS granted by CASE NUMBER:
H13018534.

And due to an incomprehensibility (ie. such considerations can take
years of contemplation) by the presiding Judge O'NEILL that physical
evidence (ie. that was presented to the RESPONDENT) was at the time
dismissed as inconsequential as a steadfast refusal by the judiciary
(ie. noting the Chief Justice of Victoria was fascist in 1934) to hear
details of any probable metalogic / noumenon correspondence (ie.
resolved against my INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY) between the #297 - MAGIC SUM
TO ROMAN PROTOTYPE #ONE as impetus for the several events:

- the schema of action related to the re-establishment of the ROMAN
CATHOLIC KNIGHTS TEMPLARS in 2015 as the year corresponding to the
crucifixion of Friday 3 APRIL 33 AD,
- the commencement of the BOER WAR on 11 OCTOBER 1899,
- a Buddha Statue thrown through my Kitchen window @ 0041 HOURS on 11
OCTOBER 2017 and
- the Blokes Biggest BBQ on 11 OCTOBER 2019,

a) Being identified as then a probable basis for a #6 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION related to the CHERISHED / BLESSED MOTHER WITH NAKED CHILD
STATUE as a subjective religious / political impost upon the appearance
of a state / federal parliamentary apology:

@1 - #65 (@135 - çemel (H5566): *STATUE* / mamlâkâh (H4467):
*SOVEREIGNTY*; *DOMINION*),
@2 - #41 (@102 - mᵉlâʼkâh (H4399): *PUBLIC* *RELIGIOUS* / *POLITICAL* *ACTION*),
@3 - #17 (@168 - chîytsôwn (H2435): *EXTERNAL* / *OUTER*) = #405 -
STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS: 卐
@4 - #57 - *DOMINION* (@215 - maʻan (H4616): *PURPOSE* / *INTENTION*) =
#620 - metáthesis (G3331): TO CHANGE; OF THINGS INSTITUTED OR ESTABLISHED

In attaining #5 - STASIS (ie. #408 - HYPOSTASIS [Greek: ὑπόστασις]) as
EQUILIBRIUM which is the mechanism of #17 - BIFURCATION against @1 -
SELF IDENTITY (#17 - chad (H2298): *ONE* / #485 - kolláō (G2853):
*CLEAVE*) as a first principle (ie. the #449 - *BRINGING* FORTH IS #497
- *ESTABLISHED*) that is implied by the Pythagorean #1080 - HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER paradigm.

b) As our reasonable view that the MANDALAY BAY HOTEL SHOOTING EVENT (killing 60 persons) of 1 OCTOBER 2017 was an ASSOCIATIVE (#342 @ 2205
HOURS) SCHEMA [#65, #41, #17 ***, #57, #33] ACTION where such atrocities
cannot be exceeded.  How else can you explain an equivalent MODUS
OPERANDI to that of the ROMAN CATHOLIC KNIGHTS TEMPLAR and their
fixation with an image published on their FaceBook page some 36 days later:

#65 - DATE OF KILLING (ROOM 32-135) ON 1 OCTOBER 2017
#41 - RESPONSE (chag (H2282): *FESTIVAL* / lâṭ (H3909): *SECRETLY*)
#17 - YEAR OF ACTION #2017
#57 - ʼâbad (H6): *EXTERMINATE*; *KILL*; *PUT* *TO* *DEATH*
#33 - ARRIVED AT MANDALAY BAY HOTEL ON 25 SEPTEMBER 2017

The question is whether the killer was the product of society (ie.
STOICHEION EXTRUSION) and we are just observing a temporal / action
cohesion or they were acting according to an associative schema.

c) That the ROMAN CATHOLIC KNIGHTS TEMPLAR (ie. the veterans / military group who gave their imprimatur to the CHRISTCHURCH terrorist event of
15 MARCH 2019 killing 51 persons) in being associated to the date #2015
clearly conveys that the AMERICAN circumstance (eg: the disproportionate
ROMAN CATHOLIC political appointments to the SCOTUS) of the 240TH
ANNIVERSARY OF THE MARINE CORPS 10 NOVEMBER 1775-2015 is also striking
at the FOUNDATIONS of AMERICAN nationhood since the DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE was established on 4 JULY 1776.



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA ON NATURAL LAW (#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY): "In English this term is frequently employed as equivalent to the *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE*, meaning the order which governs the activities of the
material universe. Among the Roman jurists natural law designated those instincts and emotions common to man and the lower animals, such as the instinct of self-preservation and love of offspring. In its strictly
ethical application—the sense in which this article treats it—the
natural law is the rule of conduct which is prescribed to us by the
Creator in the constitution of the nature with which He has endowed us.

According to St. Thomas, the natural law is "nothing else than the
rational creature's participation in the eternal law" (I-II.91.2). The
eternal law is God's wisdom, inasmuch as it is the directive norm of all movement and action. When God willed to give existence to creatures, He
willed to ordain and direct them to an end. In the case of inanimate
things, this Divine direction is provided for in the nature which God
has given to each; in them determinism reigns. Like all the rest of
creation, man is destined by God to an end, and receives from Him a
direction towards this end. This ordination is of a character in harmony
with his free intelligent nature. In virtue of his intelligence and free
will, man is master of his conduct. Unlike the things of the mere
material world he can vary his action, act, or abstain from action, as
he pleases. Yet he is not a lawless being in an ordered universe. In the
very constitution of his nature, he too has a law laid down for him,
reflecting that ordination and direction of all things, which is the
eternal law.

The rule, then, which God has prescribed for our conduct, is found in
our nature itself. Those actions which conform with its tendencies, lead
to our destined end, and are thereby constituted right and morally good;
those at variance with our nature are wrong and immoral.

The norm, however, of conduct is not some particular element or aspect
of our nature. The standard is our whole human nature with its manifold relationships, considered as a creature destined to a special end....

We may now analyse the natural law into three constituents: the
discriminating norm, the binding norm (norma obligans), and the
manifesting norm (norma denuntians). The discriminating norm is, as we
have just seen, human nature itself, objectively considered. It is, so
to speak, the book in which is written the text of the law, and the classification of human actions into good and bad. Strictly speaking,
our nature is the proximate discriminating norm or standard. The remote
and ultimate norm, of which it is the partial reflection and
application, is the Divine nature itself, the ultimate groundwork of the created order.

The binding or obligatory norm is the Divine authority, imposing upon
the rational creature the obligation of living in conformity with his
nature, and thus with the universal order established by the Creator.
Contrary to the Kantian theory that we must not acknowledge any other
lawgiver than conscience.

NOTE: *THIS* *IS* *A* *MISREPRESENTATION* *OF* *KANT* *WHO* *DEPLOYS*
*THE* *HEBREW* / *GREEK* *LEXICON* *FOR *HIS* *THESIS* WHICH CONFORMS TO
THE #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY.

It is both a trinomial constituting #27 element and a #41 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION: If "conscience is a consciousness which is for itself a
*DUTY*." And if conscience is "the moral power of judgment directed
toward itself” it is a functional construct within the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as ONTIC grounding for any moral authority.

KANT'S conception of conscience is a motivation theory set in the
context of a reflection theory. Kant distinguishes conscience from moral principles and moral judgment, which are presupposed by it, but are
identified with practical reason rather than with conscience. In the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant treats conscience under two main headings:
(1) as one of the moral feelings presupposed by our susceptibility to
duty (pp. 400-401). and (2) as a crucial aspect of a fundamental duty to ourselves, the duty of self-examination and self-knowledge as our own
moral judge (pp. 437-442). Kant's is definitely not a moral knowledge
theory, since he regards conscience as distinct from the faculty of
moral judgment, which is as the sole source of the moral knowledge that
is to be implemented in the process of self-examination (and associated motivation) that is conscience (p. 438). Kant's principal theory of
conscience is (2) the process of self-examination (ie. which is perhaps actuated by the ontic obligans such as @215 - SELF CONTRADICTION in
accord with #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE + TETRAD) and self judgment (ie.
as perhaps assayed by #123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
+ TETRAD such as #75 - FAILURE (𝍐失 - SHIH - to violate; to go against
the norm) / #198 or #230 = krínō (G2919): *PRONOUNCE* *AN* *OPINION* *CONCERNING* *RIGHT* *AND* *WRONG*: IN HUMAN LIFE, THE SUFFERING
OCCASIONED BY THE INTERNAL STRUGGLE BETWEEN GOOD AND EVIL CAN BE
MITIGATED BY A RETURN TO BALANCE AND THE REFORM OF ONE'S CONDUCT [@3,
page 401]), but it will help us understand his moral psychology better
if we begin with (1), conscience as a predisposition to *FEELING* which
is an indispensable part of being a rational moral agent.

Conscience as a presupposition of morality on the side of *FEELING*.
Early in the Groundwork, Kant denies that authentic or genuine moral
worth can belong to actions that are motivated by inclination (empirical desire) or by empirical *FEELINGS*, such as sympathy (Groundwork for a Metaphysics of Morals, pp. 397-399).

These denials are often misunderstood in the most disastrous manner
possible, when they are taken to deny that any moral value whatever
could attach either to actions we want to do or to actions whose
motivation involves *FEELING* of any sort. This leads to the common misperception of Kant as a moral philosopher who altogether hates and
despises the sensitive or emotional side of our nature and thinks that
morally good actions can be only those we have no desire at all to do.

Several distinct misunderstandings of Kant are involved in this picture,
but the one that matters most for our present purposes is the
ridiculously false idea that for Kant, action with genuine moral worth
must be unaccompanied by either *FEELING* or desire. [Allen Wood,
Stanford University, KANT ON CONSCIENCE]

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: The truth is that reason as conscience is only
immediate moral authority which we are called upon to obey (eg: WHEN THE *BIRTH* *OF* *THE* *INFANT* *WAS* *IMMINENT*, *THE* *PRIEST* *WOULD*
*REMIND* *THE* *FUTURE* *FATHER* *OF* *HIS* *DUTY* *TO* *MARRY* REDUCTIO
AD HITLERUM ON 12 MAY 1942 WITH IDEA @215 (#288 = #48 - RITUAL (LI) x #6
- CONTRARIETY (LI)) - #73 - COMPLETION (CH'ENG)) AS *SELF*
*CONTRADICTION*], and conscience itself owes its authority to the fact
that it is the mouthpiece of the Divine will and imperium.

The manifesting norm (norma denuntians), which determines the moral
quality of actions tried by the discriminating norm, is reason. Through
this faculty we perceive what is the moral constitution of our nature,
what kind of action it calls for, and whether a particular action
possesses this requisite character. [@6]

Given DE ZENGOTITA's admission of ineptitude (ie. lack of skill or
ability): "I'M NOT SURE HOW THIS WORKS, ACTUALLY, I CAN'T DISCERN THE
INTERNAL PHENOMENOLOGY (ie. the CHANGES) OF IT." [page 197]

By which we perceive that his fifth chapter commencing at page 175 are ostensibly conjectures made of predominantly sociological symptoms
amongst the shifting sands of time (ie. there have been innovations such
as smartphones which occurred since 2005) for which there may be some
axiomatic grounding of expert opinion as sure footing, but nevertheless constitutes an anthropological morass: any confusing or troublesome
situation, especially one from which it is difficult to free oneself; entanglement.

In some sense we can cohere the phenomenology by applying our neural
linguistic methodology against a semantical conception of mind [т, р, я,
с, и́, н, а] as (figuratively) anything that entraps or makes progress difficult.

And deduce the underlying meta-descriptive redacted IDEA #334 / #143
pairing concepts (ie. we'll ignore in this transitional example any DEME
/ ONTIC grounding):

{@7: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#334); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#143)}

#334 as [#6, #50, #3, #200, #70, #5] = gâraʻ (H1639): {UMBRA: #273 % #41
= #27} 1) *TO* *DIMINISH*, *RESTRAIN*, *WITHDRAW*, *ABATE*, *KEEP*
*BACK*, do away, take from, clip; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to diminish; 1a2) to restrain; 1a3) to withdraw; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be withdrawn; 1b2) to
be restrained; 1c) (Piel) to withdraw, draw up;

   #314 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 13 SEPTEMBER as [#30, #200, #4, #800]
/ [#10, #200, #4, #80, #500] /
#334 as [#30, #200, #4, #80, #500] / [#50, #200, #4, #800] = râdaph
(H7291): {UMBRA: #284 % #41 = #38} 1) to be behind, follow after,
pursue, persecute, run after; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pursue, *PUT* *TO*
*FLIGHT*, chase, dog, attend closely upon; 1a2) to persecute, harass
(fig); 1a3) to follow after, aim to secure (fig); 1a4) to run after (a
bribe) (fig); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be pursued; 1b2) one pursued
(participle); 1c) (Piel) to pursue ardently, aim eagerly to secure,
pursue; 1d) (Pual) to be pursued, be chased away; 1e) (Hiphil) to
pursue, chase;

#143 as [#8, #30, #10, #90, #5] = chălîytsâh (H2488): {UMBRA: #143 % #41
= #20} 1) *WHAT* *IS* *STRIPPED* *OFF* (a person in war), *ARMOUR*,
*SPOILS*, belt;

#143 as [#50, #2, #5, #30, #50, #6] = bâhal (H926): {UMBRA: #37 % #41 =
#37} 1) *TO* *DISTURB*, *ALARM*, *TERRIFY*, *HURRY*, *BE* *DISTURBED*,
*BE* *ANXIOUS*, *BE* *AFRAID*, *BE* *HURRIED*, *BE* *NERVOUS*; 1a)
(Niphal); 1a1) to be disturbed, dismayed, terrified, anxious; 1a2) to be
in haste, be hasty; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to make haste, act hastily, be
hurried, be hastened; 1b2) to dismay, terrify; 1c) (Pual); 1c1) to
hasten; 1c2) hastened, hastily gained (part.); 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
hasten, hurry, make haste; 1d2) to dismay, terrify;

— 👽👽 DON'T MIND US 👽👽 —
[Written: 20 MARCH 2017]

"WATCHERS WE ARE,
DO NOT DARE.
THOUGH IT BE FAR.
WE'RE STILL THERE.

THE MORE YOU SAY.
WE'LL GET TO KNOW.
COME WHAT MAY.
IT WILL BE SO."

{@9: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#343 - lâbash (H3847): *PUT* *ON* *CLOTHING*); Ego: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#314 - bâtsar (H1219): *FORTIFY*,
*MAKE* *INACCESSIBLE*)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:343,314>

    #337 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 13 SEPTEMBER as [#30, #2, #300, #5] / [#5, #30, #2, #300] /
#343 as [#1, #30, #2, #10, #300] / [#6, #5, #30, #2, #300] = lâbash
(H3847): {UMBRA: #332 % #41 = #4} 1) to dress, wear, clothe, *PUT* *ON* *CLOTHING*, be clothed; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to put on clothes, be clothed,
wear; 1a2) to put on, be clothed with (fig.); 1b) (Pual) to be fully
clothed; 1c) (Hiphil) to clothe, array with, dress;

    #314 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 13 SEPTEMBER as [#6, #10, #2, #90,
#200, #6] = bâtsar (H1219): {UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5} 1) to gather,
restrain, fence, fortify, *FORTIFY*, *MAKE* *INACCESSIBLE*; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to cut off; 1a2) fortified, cut off, made inaccessible (pass
participle); 1a3) secrets, mysteries, inaccessible things (subst); 1b)
(Niphal) to be withheld; 1c) (Piel) to fortify;

DAN SABBAGH (GUARDIAN NEWS) @ 0952 HOURS ON 13 SEPTEMBER 2022:
"RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR LATEST - WHAT WE KNOW ON DAY 202 OF THE INVASION:

Russian troops have left behind stockpiles of ammunition and other
supplies following Ukraine’s counteroffensive in Kharkiv oblast, the
Kyiv Independent reports.

The news outlet reported that Russian soldiers dropped their weapons on
the ground when they fled, with some jumping on to stolen bicycles and
trying to #343 - *PASS* *FOR* *LOCALS*.

One analyst estimated that more than 300 vehicles, including tanks, self-propelled mortars and supply trucks, had been lost between 7 and 11 SEPTEMBER." [@7]

Thus it is reasonable to conclude that some Russian troops within the
Ukraine conflict have a psychological disposition of quagmire as a
perilous, mixed up and troubled situation.

If we consider that the #343 - *PUT* *ON* *CLOTHING* is a category of understanding equivalent to #343 - *PASS* *FOR* *LOCALS* and the #314 -
*MADE* *INACCESSIBLE* / *FORTIFY* is notionally the laying of #314 -
*LAND* *MINES* that we have made a neurological association / noumenon resonance and engaged within an associative meta THINKING PROCESS (ie. pertaining to or noting an abstract, high-level analysis or commentary, especially one that consciously references something of its own type)
and theoretically possess the capability to enter into their minds and
kill the soul...

YOUTUBE: "BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgaCZBIYZjU>

That the pairing of IDEAS #343 / #314 associated with nous #81 -
SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE (PRESERVATION OF MONUMENTS) occurs
naturally within the noumenon at coordinates zen: 1, row: 1, col: 5 as
#421 - CAUSE OF REASON (ie. #205 <-> #164 intersection--> 11th dialectic
to anthropocentric singularity: 13 - 17 SEPTEMBER) / #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY.

<http://www.grapple369.com/?zen:1,row:1,col:5>

jackNote@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 81 [DATE: 2022.3.31, SUPER: #473
/ #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading,
Greatness; Tetra: 15 - REACH (TA), EGO: #446 / #81 - Propounding the
Essential; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - REACH
(TA)]

Therein is an opportunity for peace or a course of a systematic
psychological destruction--the RUSSIANS must choose!!!

We can perhaps conclude from the subsequent cautious chiding and rebuke conveyed by the Russian Press Secretary DMITRY PESKOV, as his GOVERNOR
#578 - *FELIX* moment, that a correct appraisal as discrimination of the underlying *PHENOMENOLOGY* in relation to the quagmire as the present
bad / adverse nature or troop condition of #439 - *GARBED* *TREACHERY*
is essential...

    #272 - ONTIC CHECKSUM: @115 + @157 / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31
MARCH as [#6, #20, #40, #200, #1, #5] / 
    #246 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 13 SEPTEMBER as [#40, #200, #1, #5] / = marʼeh (H4758): {UMBRA: #246
% #41 = #41} 1) sight, appearance, vision; 1a) sight, *PHENOMENON*,
spectacle, appearance, vision; 1b) what is seen; 1c) a vision
(supernatural); 1d) sight, vision (power of seeing);

#439 as [#2, #3, #4, #400, #10, #500] = beged (H899): {UMBRA: #9 % #41 =
#9} 1) treachery, deceit; 2) (CLBL) garment, clothing (used
indiscriminately); 3) a covering, i.e. clothing; also *TREACHERY* *OR* *PILLAGE*; *APPAREL*, *CLOTH*(-es, ing), garment, lap, rag, raiment,
robe, [idiom] very (treacherously), vesture, wardrobe;

AFP @ 2012 HOURS ON 13 SEPTEMBER 2022: "KREMLIN UNDER PRESSURE FROM
HAWKS AFTER UKRAINIAN SUCCESSES:

"Troubling", "a betrayal", "depressing" -- Moscow's humiliating setbacks
in eastern Ukraine over the weekend sent Russian hawks into a frenzy.

To put an end to the avalanche of scathing critiques, {@115} the Kremlin
issued a warning to those who would go too far in questioning its
strategy. {@157}

Dissenting voices need to "remain within the law" that punishes people "discrediting" the army, Kremlin spokesman DMITRY PESKOV said on Tuesday.

"The *LINE* *IS* *VERY*, *VERY* *THIN*, one must be very careful here,"
PESKOV continued.

The Russian defence ministry is painting the setback as a strategic "regrouping" of its troops and denying any debacle took place." {@12:
Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#439); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#578)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:272,439,578>

#578 as [#80, #70, #50, #8, #100, #70, #200] = ponērós (G4190): {UMBRA:
#578 % #41 = #4} 1) full of labours, annoyances, *HARDSHIPS*; 1a)
pressed and harassed by labours; 1b) bringing toils, annoyances, perils;
of a time full of peril to Christian faith and steadfastness; causing
pain and trouble; 2) *BAD*, *OF* *A* *BAD* *NATURE* *OR* *CONDITION*;
2a) in a physical sense: diseased or blind; 2b) in an ethical sense:
evil wicked, bad;

#439 as [#400, #6, #20, #8, #5] = tôwkêchâh (H8433): {UMBRA: #439 % #41
= #29} 1) rebuke, correction, reproof, punishment, chastisement; 2)
argument, reproof; 2a) argument, impeachment; 2b) *REPROOF*, *CHIDING*;
2c) correction, rebuke;

    #415 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 13 SEPTEMBER as [#300, #80, #9, #6, #500] /
    #421 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 MARCH as [#6, #300, #80, #9, #6, #500] /
#439 as [#50, #300, #80, #9] /
    #444 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 MARCH as [#5, #300, #80, #9, #10, #600] / [#300, #80, #9, #10, #5, #600] /
    #451 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 MARCH as [#6, #300, #80, #9, #50,
#6] / [#300, #80, #9, #6, #50, #6] = shâphaṭ (H8199): {UMBRA: #389 % #41
= #20} 1) to judge, govern, vindicate, punish; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO*
*ACT* *AS* *LAW*-*GIVER* *OR* *JUDGE* *OR* *GOVERNOR* (*OF* *GOD*,
*MAN*); i) *TO* *RULE*, *GOVERN*, *JUDGE*; 1a2) to decide controversy
(of God, man); 1a3) to execute judgment; i) *DISCRIMINATING* (*OF*
*MAN*); ii) vindicating; iii) condemning and punishing; iv) at
theophanic advent for final judgment; 1a4) (Niphal); i) to enter into controversy, plead, have controversy together; ii) to be judged; 1a5)
(Poel) judge, opponent-at-law (participle);

"AND WHEN #578 - *FELIX*-G5344 HEARD THESE THINGS, HAVING MORE PERFECT *KNOWLEDGE*-G1492: {@228 - THE FORCE AND MEANING OF SOMETHING WHICH HAS DEFINITE MEANING} OF THAT *WAY*-G3598: {@140 - A COURSE OF CONDUCT; A
WAY AS MANNER OF THINKING, FEELING, DECIDING / "the mystery of
existence" 4Q416; "the secret of the way things are, and learn the
nature of man and gaze at the faculties" 4Q416 Frag 77; [Acts 9:2;
28:22]}..." [Acts 24:22]

The coat of arms of Moscow and Russia depicts a horseman with a spear in
his hand slaying a basilisk (ie. little king serpent) and is identified
with Saint George and the Dragon. The heraldic emblem of Moscow has been
an integral part of the coat of arms of Russia since the 16th century.
With the current RUSSIAN coat of arms designed by artist YEVGENY
UKHNALYOV being adopted on [#371 / #393 - ALSO ON 23 APRIL AS SAINT
GEORGE DAY WITHIN ENGLAND] 30 NOVEMBER 1993 by a presidential decree,
and then by a federal law signed by PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN on 20
DECEMBER 2000.


<http://duma.gov.ru/en/news/28991/>

Two equestrian sculptures of Saint George fighting the dragon can be
seen within the centre of Moscow, both by ZURAB TSERETELI (1934) a
Soviet / Georgian painter, sculptor and architect known for large scale
and at times controversial monuments.

YAROSLAV THE WISE (died 1054) was the ruler of Kievan Rus with an image
of Saint George on his seal. Saint George was his personal patron saint;
he was baptised George. Saint George was also the patron saint of
YAROSLAV's great-grandson, YURY DOLGORUKY, who - according to tradition
- founded the city of Moscow shortly before his death in 1157. (The name
"Yury" is a Russian-language equivalent of "George".)

YOUTUBE: "PLEASURE & PAIN (DIVINYLS - 1985)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5boYiMktOvs>

"I've been standing at the back of your life,
Back row center just above the ice,
Please don't ask me how I've been getting off,
No please don't ask me how I've been getting off {@143 = [т, р, я, с,
и́, н, а]}

Break my body with the back of your hand,
Doesn't make sense from where I stand,
Baby, baby why you wanna mess it up,
Sooner or later I'll find my place,
Find my body better fix my face,
Please don't ask me,
How I've been getting off,
No please don't ask me
How I've been getting off

It's a *FINE* *LINE* between pleasure and pain"

{@15: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#500 - tannîyn (H8577): *DRAGON* / châtsab (H2672): *STONE*); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#645 - gôwrâl (H1486): *RECOMPENSE*, *RETRIBUTION* / hâmam (H2000): *TROUBLE*, *VEX*)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:143,500,645>

#500 as [#400, #50, #10, #600] = tannîyn (H8577): {UMBRA: #510 % #41 =
#18} 1) *DRAGON*, serpent, sea monster; 1a) dragon or dinosaur; 1b) sea
or river monster; 1c) serpent, venomous snake;

#500 as [#8, #90, #2, #400] / [#400, #8, #90, #2] = châtsab (H2672):
{UMBRA: #100 % #41 = #18} 1) to dig, cleave, divide, hew, make, cut out,
dig out, cut down, *QUARRY*, *HEWER*, *MASON*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to hew
out, dig; 1a2) to hew; i) *STONE*; ii) wood; 1a3) to hew in pieces
(metaph.); 1a4) to divide, cleave; 1b) (Niphal) to be cut, be hewn, be engraved; 1c) (Hiphil) to hew into pieces, cut up into pieces; 1d)
(Pual) to be cut from, be hewn from;

#500 as [#1, #80, #70, #30, #8, #300, #1, #10] = apóllymi (G622):
{UMBRA: #661 % #41 = #5} 1) to destroy; 1a) to put out of the way
entirely, abolish, put an end to ruin; 1b) render useless; 1c) to kill;
1d) to declare that one must be put to death; 1e) metaphor: *TO*
*DEVOTE* *OR* *GIVE* *OVER* *TO* *ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*; 1f) to
perish, to be lost, ruined, destroyed; 2) to destroy; 2a) to lose;

"AND HIS DISCIPLES CAME TO HIM, AND AWOKE HIM, SAYING, LORD, SAVE US: WE *PERISH*-G622." [Matthew 8:25]

    #244 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 14 SEPTEMBER as [#5, #3, #6, #200, #30] /
    #245 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 14 SEPTEMBER as [#6, #3, #6, #200,
#30] / [#3, #6, #200, #30, #6] /
#645 as [#3, #6, #200, #30, #6, #400] = gôwrâl (H1486): {UMBRA: #239 %
#41 = #34} 1) lot; 1a) lot - *PEBBLES* used for systematically making decisions; 2) portion; 2a) lot, portion (thing assigned by casting
lots); 2b) *RECOMPENSE*, *RETRIBUTION*;

#645 as [#10, #5, #30, #600] = yahălôm (H3095): {UMBRA: #85 % #41 = #3}
1) a *PRECIOUS* *STONE* (known for its hardness); 1a) perhaps the
jasper, onyx, or diamond;

#645 as [#5, #40, #600] = hâmam (H2000): {UMBRA: #85 % #41 = #3} 1) to
move noisily, confuse, make a noise, discomfit, break, consume, *CRUSH*, *DESTROY*, *TROUBLE*, *VEX*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move noisily; 1a2) to
confuse, discomfit, vex;

"I WILL SEND MY FEAR BEFORE THEE, AND WILL *DESTROY*-H2000 ALL THE
PEOPLE TO WHOM THOU SHALT COME, AND I WILL MAKE ALL THINE ENEMIES TURN
THEIR BACKS UNTO THEE." [Exodus 23:27]

NOTE: That Breccia (ie. as shown by the "Saint George slaying the
Dragon" statue in Zagreb of Croatia) is a sedimentary rock composed of
large angular broken fragments of minerals or rocks cemented together by
a fine-grained matrix. Like conglomerate, breccia contains at least 30
percent of gravel-sized particles (particles over 2mm in size), but it
is distinguished from conglomerate because the rock fragments have sharp
edges that have not been worn down. Breccia was regarded by the Romans
as an especially #645 - *PRECIOUS* *STONE* and was often used in
high-profile public buildings.

We must acknowledge a conceptual failure by DE ZENGOTITA, through his
usage of a rhetorical device in mediating an incapability to "DISCERN
THE INTERNAL PHENOMENOLOGY (ie. the CHANGES)" and its role in
"DISENFRANCHISING AUTONOMOUS CONSCIOUSNESS" as the notion belatedly
expressed within [the] 22[nd] page of a chapter comprising only some 33
pages. Which bears some further explanation of its capricious (ie.
*CHANGING* according to no discernible rules; unpredictable) nature as
the capability, on one hand, to predispose the reader to a potential for prejudice by then cohering the narrative upon either preconceived
grounds or misapprehension.

And secondly, a capacity in being subject to process of a beguiling by
the author, {

@10: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#449 - yâlad (H3205): *BRING* *FORTH* *OF* *WICKED* *BEHAVIOUR*); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#355 - machăshâbâh
(H4284): *DEVICE*, *PLAN*, *PURPOSE*; *INVENTION*})

} in then trusting an expert opinion that is sustained by argumentative contrivance (ie. [#516 / #421] like an episode of Queer Eye for the
Straight Guy) and yet improperly claims post modern philosophical
perspective has any substantive understanding as coherent reality of
either the human faculty or its implicit nature as identity. [#542 / #502]

In and of itself, it has the capability to #516 - *DISPOSSESS* (yârash (H3423)) one from the substantive #421 - *CAUSE* *OF* *REASON* (ʼôwdôwth (H182)) and #542 - *PERVERT* (ʻâvath (H5791)) the capacity for #502 - *UNDERSTANDING* (bîyn (H995)).

As occurred in our previous chapter in relation to metaphysical
perspectives of APATHY that are distinct to the author's perspective,
once again our rudimentary understanding of "INTERNAL PHENOMENOLOGY AND
ITS ROLE IN DISENFRANCHISING AUTONOMOUS CONSCIOUSNESS" (eg: #451 -
PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + TETRAD SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532)) includes
metaphysical and moral conceptions which are entirely unknown to DE
ZENGOTITA's postmodern philosophical worldview. Therefore his

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)