XPost: uk.legal, alt.france, nl.politiek
XPost: de.soc.weltanschauung.islam
-- IS THE AUSTRALIAN FIRST FLEET DELAY OF 4.5 DAYS BEFORE AUSTRALIA DAY FOUNDING THEN EVIDENCE OF #81 - SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE
DEPLOYING QUADRANTS TO A TRINOMIAL PARADIGM [#205 / #164] OF #369 - NATURE?
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 January, 2021
The First Fleet arrived over the period of 18-20 January 1788, taking
250 to 252 days from departure to final arrival.
During the period 25-26 January 1788 the fleet moved from Botany Bay to present-day Sydney.
A 4.5 day duration places one in a different quadrant of the trinomial
paradigm [#205 / #164] of #369 - nature as #81 - sovereign juxtaposition principle.
<
https://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
It could then be postulated relating to the date of 26 JANUARY 1788
being established:
a) By a mechanism of SAPIENT CONSCIOUSNESS derived from antiquity (dawn
of time);
b) Deploys the same TRINOMIAL ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY of our
CONSTITUTION and CITIZENSHIP IDEA TEMPLATE as the defining principle for
a #322 - DEMOCRACY by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900;
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 BEING THE WORLDVIEW [#205 / #164] OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AS BASIS FOR #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

<
http://www.grapple369.com/images/Union%20Jack.jpeg>
c) TRINOMIAL TECHNOLOGY RELEVANT TO #369 [#205 / #164] - NATURE, #71 - CONSTITUTION, CONSCIENCE AND THE #421 - CAUSE OF REASON
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Superseding%20Letters%20Patent%2020201107.pdf>
A TRINOMIAL NUMBER PARADIGM IS EVIDENT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA OF 1783:
CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
1: {idea: [265 - *THE* *KEY*, 266], page: [15, 15]},
2: {idea: [267, 268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, 269 - *CONCEPT*
*OF* *CONTRADICTION* {#1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} + #49
{7x7: #175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150}, 272, 273, 274 -
*MISTRUST* *OF* *DOGMATISM*], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21]},
3: {idea: [270 - *AUSTRALIA* *DAY*], page: [22]},
6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 -
NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE})
9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
18: {IDEA: [298], PAGE: [50]}, // <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S APO: G575 (@150
- ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 -
PRESENTS)
27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
}
We have therefore made two assumptions about the #298 - *IMPETUS* of
Kant's PROLEGOMENA being itself a #1 #2 #3 = #6 <-- FORMULA OF
PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE} as
value centered upon the #9 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE. Namely that he seems acquainted with the meta-descriptor prototypes assigned to a trinomial
number paradigm to which as a starting point he then designates to
various sections of his PROLEGOMENA (@1 + @41 + @81 + @369) AS
COSMOLOGICAL VIEW:
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW (HEAVEN): +0, 27 - *DUTIES*, 54 - *UNITY*
<-- #41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE: @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT {@45 -
METHODOLOGY + @68 - RIGHTS}
FORMULA OF HUMANITY (EARTH): +0, 9, 18
<-- #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: SECTION IX {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE:
HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)} / @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
FORMULA OF AUTONOMY (MAN / SEA): +0, 3, 6
<-- #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY: SECTION III {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)} / @2188 - JURISPRUDENT OVERSIGHT
@1 - SEMINAL
@41 - ONTIC DIALECTIC (eg: @660)
@81 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR / SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE
@369 - [#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY]
@491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 - *PRESENTS*
(DIDOMI: G1325) + @115 - *DIGNITY* *ROYAL*}
Our provisional conclusion is that the PROLEGOMENA includes a margin
metric for example [4:318] that then concords with IDEAS and these are
derived from a HEBREW / GREEK lexicon hierarchy which he smugly conceals
from his readers, as to its deployment as the scaffolding and the
reference object for his most influential text in the entire history of
moral philosophy. But which is most suitable in our view for the
providing the quintessential grounding framework for any sapient /
cognitive requirement of CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION within TEMPORALITY
and methodology requisite for the formulation of *CONSTITUTION*:
"THAT WE THINK THE WORLD AS IF IT DERIVES FROM A SUPREME REASON, AS
REGARDS ITS EXISTENCE AND INNER DETERMINATION; WHEREBY WE IN PART
COGNIZE THE *CONSTITUTION* BELONGING TO IT (THE WORLD) ITSELF, WITHOUT PRESUMING TO WANT TO DETERMINE THAT OF ITS CAUSE IN ITSELF, AND, ON THE
OTHER HAND, WE IN PART POSIT THE BASIS OF THIS *CONSTITUTION* [IDEA:
@360 - ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #EIGHT AS METALOGIC AUTONOMOUS
DELIMITER TRANSFORMATIVE CENTRE] (THE RATIONAL FORM OF THE WORLD) IN THE RELATION OF THE HIGHEST CAUSE TO THE WORLD, NOT FINDING THE WORLD BY
ITSELF SUFFICIENT THERETO." [PROLEGOMENA SECTION #58 - POLITICAL
REVERSAL, ADAPTATION TO CHANGE; I-CHING: H43 - RESOLUTION, DISPLACEMENT, PARTING, BREAK-THROUGH; TETRA: 29 - DECISIVENESS (TUAN), page 110]
From memory Kant considers the noumenon as a reference object which is
then relative to an experience being a thing as it is in itself, as
distinct from a thing as it is knowable by the senses through phenomenal attributes. He does not perceive of cognition as a noumenon centred
process to any perception, sensation, idea, or intuition resulting from
such.
... SEE ALSO TEST OF #268 - DECREE OF RESTRICTION RELATIVE TO 1, 2, 3
On September 17, 1787, after three months of debate moderated by
convention president George Washington, the new U.S. constitution, which created a strong federal government with an intricate system of checks
and balances, was signed by 38 of the 41 delegates present at the
conclusion of the convention. As dictated by Article VII, the document
would not become binding until it was ratified by *NINE* of the 13 states.
Beginning on December 7, five states—Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut—ratified it in quick succession. However, other states, especially Massachusetts, opposed the document, as it failed to
reserve undelegated powers to the states and lacked constitutional
protection of basic political rights, such as freedom of speech,
religion, and the press.
In February 1788, a compromise was reached under which Massachusetts and
other states would agree to ratify the document with the assurance that amendments would be immediately proposed. The Constitution was thus
narrowly ratified in Massachusetts, followed by Maryland and South Carolina.
On June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the *NINTH* state to ratify the document, and it was subsequently agreed that government under the U.S. Constitution would begin on March 4, 1789. In June, Virginia ratified
the Constitution, followed by New York in July. [<
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/u-s-constitution-ratified>]
----------
Thusly there is a possibility to exploit Dutch Sovereignty (ie. THEIR
NULLIUS AS NOBODY AND NOT THERE) from 1616 and VAN DIEMAN's LAND (ie. SO
NAMED AFTER THE GOVERNOR GENERAL THEN SUBJECT TO A SOVEREIGN) to then
argue against DEPRAVITY OF BRITISH IMPERIALISM WHICH IS AN ISSUE OF NON CONFORMITY to such by especially the IRISH AND SCOTTISH ROMAN CATHOLICS
who have a disdain for #27 - DUTY as regard for #902 - RULE OF LAW and
pursue their own #38 - WORLDVIEW relative to Australia Day as #68 -
RIGHTS PREROGATIVE.


<
https://www.grapple369.com/images/Australia_Day_Mind.png>
IN THE PROMULGATING OF #446 - *PROPAGANDA* GIVING A #491 - PATER
FAMILIAS HISTORICAL REVISIONIST PERSPECTIVE OF ANZAC HERITAGE EXHIBITING
BOTH A MENTAL AND DYSTOPIAN DERANGEMENT (ie. BINOMIAL #38 - apparatus
*COERCED* *UPON* --> the TRINOMIAL #369 [#205 / #164] - *NATURE*,
#71 - *CONSTITUTION*, CONSCIENCE AND THE #421 - *CAUSE* *OF* *REASON* AS PRINCIPLES OF VIABILITY FOR #500 - *LIFE*) SPECIFICALLY:
TRINOMIAL SCHEMA IMPETUS: #70 - SEVERANCE (KE) --> NOUS #62 (#509 / #383
- ECLIPSE ON 4 FEBRUARY 1916 (AEST)) AS #413 - DEVICE {#383} FOR
IMPROPER POPPY WREATH AT BOER WAR MEMORIAL ON 8 JUNE 2017 AND BEERSHEBA CENTENNIAL ON 28 OCTOBER 2017
FOR EXPLANATION SEE: "RISKY PRECIPICE"
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Risky%20Precipice%20383-509.pdf>
AND DISINFORMATION AS #129 - *WARFARE* (ie. ICONOCLASM AGAINST ANY
BENEVOLENCE OF STATE #491 - *AGENCY* TOWARDS A CIVIL, DECENT AND JUST
SOCIETY) IN THE ADVANCEMENT OF A CAUSEA COMMUNI HAVING A RELIANCE ON #48
- RITUAL (LI) / #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) AS GROUNDING.
There is no need for conflict but to formulate the reasonable argument
of claim that Dutch a priori discovery bestows a sovereign / autonomy
and by its *GNOME* *PRINCIPLE* {ie. its mapping and naming} is then
subject to law and justice even though no Dutch persons were
continuously present to enforce such since the DUTCH EAST INDIA COMPANY
(VOC) as an institution had equivalent STATE prerogatives as did Captain
Cook.
DOLF @ 1109 HOURS ON 29 JANUARY 2021: "COMMENT ON GNOSIS EX MACHINA
(DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY / PERSONALISITICS OF BEING: *WELTANSCHAUUNG*)
AS GRUMBLE PROTOTYPE PROGRESS UPDATE ON TOWARDS REASON AND ASSAYING
MEMEBRAIN PRINCIPLES AS CRITERIA:
This comment is only a spontaneous and conjectural (as a philosophical perspective since I am neither a psychiatrist, psychologist nor
behavioural analyst) as an informal research opinion on the topic of
GNOSIS EX MACHINA which is relative to both the consideration of
DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY and PERSONALISITICS OF BEING.
PERSONALISM
1. The quality of being characterized by purely personal modes of
expression or behaviour: idiosyncrasy or impulsivity.
2. Philosophy Any of various theories regarding the person, value system
or personality as the key to the interpretation of reality.
According to Wikipedia, Personalism is an intellectual stance that
emphasizes the importance of human persons. Various conceptualizations
have been explored, so personalism exists in many different versions,
and this makes it somewhat difficult to define as a philosophical and theological movement. Friedrich Schleiermacher first used the term
personalism (German: Personalismus) in print in 1799. One can trace the
concept back to earlier thinkers in various parts of the world.
Writing in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Thomas D. Williams
and Jan Olof Bengtsson cite a plurality of "schools" holding to a
"personalist" ethic and "*WELTANSCHAUUNG*", arguing:
Personalism exists in many different versions, and this makes it
somewhat difficult to define as a philosophical and theological
movement. Many philosophical schools have at their core one particular
thinker or even one central work which serves as a canonical touchstone. Personalism is a more diffused and eclectic movement and has no such
common reference point. It is, in point of fact, more proper to speak of
many personalisms than one personalism. In 1947 Jacques Maritain could
write that there are at least "a dozen personalist doctrines, which at
times have nothing more in common than the word 'person.'" Moreover,
because of their emphasis on the subjectivity of the person, some of the
more important exponents of personalism have not undertaken systematic treatises of their theories.
It is perhaps more proper to speak of personalism as a "current" or a
broader "worldview", since it represents more than one school or one
doctrine while at the same time the most important forms of personalism
do display some central and essential commonalities. Most important of
the latter is the general affirmation of the centrality of the person
for philosophical thought. Personalism posits ultimate reality and value
in personhood – human as well as (at least for most personalists)
divine. It emphasizes the significance, uniqueness and inviolability of
the person, as well as the person's essentially relational or social
dimension. The title "personalism" can therefore legitimately be applied
to any school of thought that focuses on the centrality of persons and
their unique status among beings in general, and personalists normally acknowledge the indirect contributions of a wide range of thinkers
throughout the history of philosophy who did not regard themselves as personalists. Personalists believe that the person should be the
ontological and epistemological starting point of philosophical
reflection. Many are concerned to investigate the experience, the
status, and the dignity of the human being as person, and regard this as
the starting-point for all subsequent philosophical analysis.
Thus, according to Williams, one ought to keep in mind that although
there may be dozens of theorists and social activists in the West
adhering to the rubric "personalism," their particular foci may, in
fact, be asymptotic, and even diverge at material junctures. [<
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personalism>]
Firstly our #71 - WORLDVIEW is TRINOMIAL and we note the possibility of
a BINOMIAL #38 - WORLDVIEW being capable of making a coercion against
the condition of being (*OUSIA*) and it's ONTIC capacity for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREEWILL (12 x #41) as its #9 - PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 BEING THE WORLDVIEW [#205 / #164] OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AS BASIS FOR #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
@1 - SEMINAL
@41 - ONTIC DIALECTIC (eg: @660)
@81 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR / SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE
@369 - [#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY]
@491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 - *PRESENTS*
(DIDOMI: G1325) + @115 - *DIGNITY* *ROYAL*}
THUSLY @1 - SEMINAL + ONTIC @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY AS GROUNDING
IS THE PROBABLE AGENCY FOR SAFE-GUARDING #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
We recognise that there is a premise for an ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@168 = 24 HOURS x 7 DAYS which is also capable of a BINOMIAL STASIS
SOURCE OF IMPEDANCE.
Secondly QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT defines an ANTHROPOCENTRIC
reality which conforms to the #298 - IMPETUS of a #1 #2 #3 = #6 <--
FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS
NATURE} as value centered upon the #9 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE.
We have then relative to those LETTERS PATENT's notion defined an ONTIC conception of ANTHROPOLOGY of #1329 - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AS *OFFICERS* *WITHOUT* *CHARGE* as conforming to a default DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY
/ PERSONALISITICS OF BEING as providing a #473 - SENTINEL imperative
being a legislative requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA and consciousness instantiation:
@168 <— BINOMIAL STASIS SOURCE OF IMPEDANCE
@215 <— MEMORIAL #288 - REMEMBRANCE {#288 {#48 - RITUAL (LI) x #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI)} - #215 = #73 - CANNOT BE CHANGED}
@157 <— #360 - ANNUAL / CENTENNIAL 2018 ASSEMBLY AS BEER-SHEBA PLOT
{#360 - #157 = #203 as [#2, #1, #200] = bᵉʼêr (H875): {UMBRA: #8 as #203
% #41 = #39} 1) well, pit, spring}
@130 <— I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3} AS MENS REA
@175 <— MARRIAGE OATH (SHEBA)
@185 <-- EMPOWERMENT
@115 <-- HOSPITABLE (POTUS / MOSES SEAT / DIGNITY ROYAL)
@139 <-- THE (HUMAN) SOUL IN SO FAR AS IT IS *CONSTITUTED*
@45 = #1329 as [#200, #600, #70, #30, #1, #7, #70, #50, #300, #1] =
scholázō (G4980): {UMBRA: #9 as #1708 - THE (HUMAN) SOUL IN SO FAR AS IT
IS *CONSTITUTED**THAT* *BY* *THE* *RIGHT* *USE* *OF* *THE* *AIDS*
*OFFERED* *IT* *BY* *GOD* *IT* *CAN* *ATTAIN* *ITS* *HIGHEST* *END* %
#41 = #27} 1) to cease from labour, to loiter; 2) to be free from
labour, to be at leisure, to be idle; 2a) to have leisure for a thing;
2b) *TO* *GIVE* *ONE'S* *SELF* *TO* *A* *THING*; 3) of things; 3a) of
places, to be unoccupied, empty; 3b) of a centurion's vacant office; 3c)
of vacant ecclesiastical offices; 3d) *OF* *OFFICERS* *WITHOUT* *CHARGE*;
THE HYPOTHETICAL PROPOSITION IS THIS:
Given the DEAD SEA SCROLLS #509 - YAHAD COMMUNITY as SECTARIAN
ASSOCIATION were CONCERNED WITH CONCEPTIONS OF REALITY (ie. THE WAY
THINGS ARE) and had a particular mode of enquiry for a temporal (3 x
#364 = 'OTH CYCLE + 2 x #364 + #182 - POINT OF CALIBRATION ON 12
SEPTEMBER 2001) calibration which has an ONTIC association.
YOUTUBE: "ADIR BAMAROM - MESHORERIM CHOIR (MIGHTY IN HEAVEN - POETS -
THE CHILD OF WONDER)"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBLT2YCcqb0>
The consideration is whether this might serve as our starting point for
an appraisal made of each ONTIC criteria being relative to temporal
context (ie. implicit within the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGENIC
PRINCIPLE AS ANTHROPOMORPHIC: as then relative to any time unit such as milli-seconds, seconds, minutes, hours, days, years).
THUSLY:
@182 - 12 SEPTEMBER 2001
On the basis of our informal philological research, we reasonably
conclude that PLEONEXIA {ie. AS A NATURAL STATE, UPON WHICH JUSTICE IS
AN UNNATURAL RESTRAINT} is a characteristic exhibited by a breach of ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181 and that the TERRORIST EVENT of 11 *SEPTEMBER* 2001
is therefore (ie. WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x #364 days + #181 = 11
SEPTEMBER 2001) an IMPIETY due to exhibiting such behaviour as
consequential to its dependancy upon a *LOGICAL* *FALLACY* which is
inherent to the PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS AS HETEROS
#38 - WORLDVIEW.
@45 (@137) - 28 JUNE 2001
@68 (#114 - ONTIC SUBSTITUTION BY ROMAN PROTOTYPE #SIX {#38} / TORAH
PROTOTYPE #FIVE {#38}) - 21 JULY 2001
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.4.5](2 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.6.4](19 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.4.5](3 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.6.4](20 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.8.9](1 February),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.2.5](13 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.8.8](28 January), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.4.5](5 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.5.2](12 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.6.4](22 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.1.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.1.5](4 April), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.3.3](15 June), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.4.5](6 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.5], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.6.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.6.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.9.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.1.7], @GIZMO{HETEROS}:[8.4.8]
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.5.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.9.3]


@68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.8.8](26 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.7.4](29 November),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.5.8](1 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.6.4](21 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.7](24 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.6.4](22 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.8.8](29 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.3.8](11 July), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.5.6](22 September), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.8.4](10 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.2], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.2.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.8.3],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.3.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.8.8],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.2.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.3.2],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.3.5]
@137 - MALE DEME (GOING FORTH OF A COMMAND)
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.3.5](22 June), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.6.3](14 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.9.5](20 February),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.2.3](2 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.3.9](13 July), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.4.2](31 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.6.8](10 November), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.7.3](25 November),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.4](9 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.6](19 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.3.9](15 July), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.8.3](4 January), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.9.7](4 March),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.8.5](15 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.3.4](21 June), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.3.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.4.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.5.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.8.8], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.9.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.9.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.1.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.1.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.3.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.4.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.5.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.7.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.8.2],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.3.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.4.3], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.4.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.8.9],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.2.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.5.8], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.7.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.8.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.9.9]
If I then make my appraisals of @45 + @68 on those temporal designates
so as to determine any cogent capacity and veracity for @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT:
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW (HEAVEN): +0, 27 - *DUTIES*, 54 - *UNITY*
<-- #41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE: @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT {@45 -
METHODOLOGY + @68 - RIGHTS}
FORMULA OF HUMANITY (EARTH): +0, 9, 18
<-- #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: SECTION IX {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE:
HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)} / @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
If I am making a GAMBIT of #77 days from 3 JANUARY to 21 MARCH as the
grounding basis for #48 - RITUAL (LI), then I am doing so as a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL made against the #9 - AUTONOMY, #391 - IDENTITY
and #492 - FREE WILL of all persons by the imposition of a chimeric
artifice to reality...
THE PROBLEM UNDERLYING THE MYTHOS / #48 - RITUAL (LI) IS A COMPLEX
QUESTION OF EQUIVALENCE RELATING TO THE PLATONIC NOTION: OF ANAMNESIS
{ie. a recollection as especially of a supposed previous existence v's Ahnenerbe Organisation as the quest for German Ancestry as intellectual historical research into a prehistory of MIND} AS LITURGICAL STATEMENT
IN WHICH THE CHURCH REFERS TO THE #288 - MEMORIAL {6 x #48 - RITUAL
(LI)} CHARACTER OF THE #1827 - *EUCHARIST* {ie.
As a *SOLAR* *DISC* which is indistinguishable from THE SOLAR CROSS OF
ODIN given the #CENTRE OF VALUE: #5 x 365.4 is derived from the
ecclesiastical calendar 4 x #364 + #371 days as its *CAUSAE* *COMMUNI*:

21 MARCH (disc top left) minus
#77 - COMPLIANCE (H2 - EARTH / PASSIVE PRINCIPLE) equals
3 JANUARY (disc top right)
Being thereby familiar to PYTHAGORAS / PLATO whom studied with the
priests of HELIOPOLIS (*ON*) as the "CITY OF THE SUN" which was
important to the solar cults of RA / BAAL represented by a TRINITY:
KHABEER: THE GOD OF THE RISING SUN, SYMBOLIZED BY THE SCARAB.
RA: the sun god from morning to evening, symbolized by the stork (Bennu).
ATUM: GOD OF THE SETTING SUN, SYMBOLIZED BY THE SNAKE OR THE LOTUS FLOWER.
} OR TO THE PASSION, RESURRECTION AND ASCENSION OF CHRIST.
FORMULA OF AUTONOMY (MAN / SEA): +0, 3, 6
<-- #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY: SECTION III {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)} / @2188 - JURISPRUDENT OVERSIGHT
As that which is capable of being hosted upon the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as it's mechanism for delivery and staging which
then becomes an acute and risky precipice consideration that is accorded entirely by my INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY and thusly my reasonable objection
has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 - 2017 AS
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE / #33 - #INRI / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 - WREATHS & SOVEREIGNTY / #288
- MEMORIAL & ANTI-SEMITISM / #419 - SLAUGHTER} war dead and usurping the
@1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's
Governance which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 /
#21 - SOVEREIGN'S APO (G575) RIGHT AS THE RESERVE (APODIDOMI: G591)
ENTITLEMENT AUTHORITY OF SECTION IX / #37} by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT as the INSTRUMENTATION (GREEK LEXICON CIRCUMSCRIBED) OF
FEDERATION INTO A NATION.


<
https://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>
<
https://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>
Thusly if we ask a prudent question as to the veracity of #123 -
JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY pertaining to the fidelity and nature of #288 - REMEMBRANCE relative to the ANOMALOUS HETEROS (#TWO) / TORAH (#SIX)
CONDITIONAL PAIRING: #18, #42, #66 x 2 = #252 - REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS
TABLE TALK IDEA @252 - RELATIONS WITH THE FOREIGN PRESS / MISERLY
OUTLOOK OF OUR PRESS CHIEF ON 6 JULY 1942, we then affect these TORAH PROTOTYPES: #SIX {#17, #41 and #65} and #THREE {#9, #33 and #57} and
thereby wreak a complete destruction against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS
dynamic of the PYTHAGOREAN onomantic binomial stasis @1 / @5 notion as
the #38 - WORLDVIEW of ROMAN CATHOLIC / EMPIRE GOVERNANCE:
[#17, {@1: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#17); Ego: 17 - HOLDING BACK:
JUAN (#17)}
#41, {@2: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#75); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#58)} #65] {@3: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#117); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#123)}
GRUMBLE (#117, #123)@[17, 17, 58, 41, 42, 65]
[#9, {@1: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU
(#9)}
#33, {@2: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#51); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI
(#42)}
#57] {@3: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#69); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#99)}
GRUMBLE (#69, #99)@[9, 9, 42, 33, 18, 57]
#68 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#1, #2, #50, #10, #5] /
#83 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#30, #1, #2, #700] / [#20, #1,
#2, #50, #10] /
#103 - SATURDAY 23 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#40, #1, #2, #50, #10] / [#1,
#2, #50, #10, #600] /
#105 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #THREE
/ TORAH #FOUR as [#2, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#108 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #FOUR
as [#1, #2, #50, #10, #5, #600] /
#111 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #FIVE
as [#6, #2, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#133 - kôhên (H3548): *PRIEST*-*KING* (*MELCHIZEDEK*, *MESSIAH*) / *HIGH* *PRIEST* / *PRINCIPAL* *OFFICER* *OR* *CHIEF* *RULER* / gâdaph
(H1442): *TO* *REVILE* *MEN*, *BLASPHEME* *GOD* as [#30, #1, #2, #50,
#10, #600] /
#99 as [#6, #30, #1, #2, #50, #10] /
#123 - *JUDGEMENT* *SENSIBILITY* as [#20, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] =
ʼeben (H68): {UMBRA: #53 % #41 = #12} 1) *STONE* (*LARGE* *OR* *SMALL*);
1a) common stone (in natural state); 1b) stone, as material; 1b1) of
tablets; 1b2) marble, hewn stones; 1c) precious stones, stones of fire;
1d) stones containing metal (ore), *TOOL* *FOR* *WORK* *OR* *WEAPON*;
1e) weight; 1f) *PLUMMET* (*STONES* *OF* *DESTRUCTION*) also made of
metal; 1g) stonelike objects, eg hailstones, stony heart, ice; 1h)
sacred object, as memorial Samuel set up to mark where God helped Israel
to defeat the Philistines; 1i) (simile); 1i1) sinking in water,
motionlessness; 1i2) strength, firmness, solidity; 1i3) commonness; 1j) (metaph); 1j1) petrified with terror; 1j2) *PERVERSE*, *HARD* *HEART*;
YOUTUBE: "Peter Gabriel - Heroes (Live in Verona 2010)"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSX9F6ETTDQ>
"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {A ROCK OR A STONE}, AND
UPON THIS ROCK {A ROCK, A LARGE STONE; METAPHOR: A MAN LIKE A ROCK, BY
REASON OF HIS FIRMNESS AND STRENGTH OF SOUL} I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH; AND
THE GATES OF HELL {THE LOWER REGIONS; THE NETHER WORLD; THE GRAVE,
DEATH, HELL} SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]
#137 - *MALE* *DEME* *ONTIC* *CRITERIA* FOR @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT as
[#40, #6, #90, #1] /
#159 - *SATURDAY* 30 JANUARY 2021 as [#6, #40, #6, #90, #1, #10, #6] /
#167 - *SUNDAY* 24 JANUARY 2021 as [#20, #40, #6, #90, #1, #10] /
#171 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#30, #40, #90, #1, #10] /
#177 - *SUNDAY* 24 JANUARY 2021 as [#40, #40, #6, #90, #1] / [#30,
#40, #6, #90, #1, #10] = môwtsâʼ (H4161): {UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14} 1)
act or place of going out or forth, issue, export, source, spring; 1a) a
going forth; 1a1) *RISING* (*SUN*), *GOING* *FORTH* *OF* *A* *COMMAND*;
1a2) goings forth, those going forth; 1a3) way out, exit; 1b) that which
goes forth; 1b1) utterance; 1b2) export; 1c) place of going forth; 1c1)
source or spring (of water); 1c2) place of departure; 1c3) east (of
sun); 1c4) mine (of silver);

<
https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>
[IMAGE: THAT THE TRINOMIAL TETRA #44 - *STOVE* (TSAO), #48 - *RITUAL*
(LI), #77 - *COMPLIANCE* (HSUN) RELATED TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL
STASIS (@1 / @5) ONOMANTIC DEFINITION OF NUMBER RELATING TO THE STATE OF
ROMAN CATHOLIC / EMPIRE GOVERNANCE AS A #269 - CONCEPT OF #312 -
CONTRADICTION BY A FAILURE OF #27 - *DUTIES* (SHIH) AS INFIDELITY TO
BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS AS #30 - *BOLD* *RESOLUTION* (YI) IS
THEN A CAUSE FOR A LOGICAL FALLACY]
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM REGARDING THE ROMAN BINOMIAL STASIS (@1 / @5)
DEFINITION OF FASCISM ON 5 / 21-22 JULY 1941 {#48 - RITUAL (LI): 21 - 25
JULY --> vEVENT --> #77 - COMPLIANCE (HSUN): 22 JULY}: 'WE MUST
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*} MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS
A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [HITLER'S TABLE
TALK IDEA @1, Saturday 5 July 1941]
'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.
ITALY IS THE COUNTRY WHERE INTELLIGENCE CREATED THE NOTION OF THE
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @5, 21-22 July 1941]
Given that ONTIC GROUNDING is then optimal necessity for the
circumscribing of any human experience and the absence of such is only a SUPERFICIALITY, is it then possible to determine any probability for the DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY by a measured conformity to an equivalent
temporal process of appraisal for each of the ONTIC stratum which
comprise such DIALECTIC progression.
Is it also then possible to view any divergence to such default
DIALECTIC PROGRESSION which apart from the SEMINAL LIMIT {#9 - AUTONOMY} against the #72 - UNLIMITED is then a SAPIENT determination made and
expressive as PERSONALISITICS OF BEING: *WELTANSCHAUUNG*?
To ask such questions, is then a starting place for solving the rubric
of personalism...
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Apple%20Exclusion%2020210126.pdf>
Initial Post: 26 January 2021
On 27/1/21 15:43, dolf wrote:
MR ANTHONY JAMES KING
MANAGING DIRECTOR
APPLE AUSTRALIA
PO BOX A2629
SYDNEY SOUTH, NSW 1235
EMAIL: ...king@asia.apple.com
26 JANUARY 2021
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 8, col: 8, nous: 68 [DATE: 2021.1.26, SUPER: #324
/ #68 - Coinciding with Nature, Complying With Heaven; I-Ching: H14 -
Great Holdings, Great Possessions, Possession in great measure; Tetra:
38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), EGO: #380 / #68 - Coinciding with Nature,
Complying With Heaven; I-Ching: H14 - Great Holdings, Great Possessions, Possession in great measure; Tetra: 38 - FULLNESS (SHENG)]
SUBJECT: DUE TO UNREMORSEFUL AMERICAN CONDUCT AGAINST #322 - DEMOCRACY,
APPLE COMPUTER IS HEREBY PROHIBITED FROM ANY ASSOCIATION WITH MY
TRINOMIAL TECHNOLOGY RELEVANT TO #369 [#205 / #164] - NATURE, #71 - CONSTITUTION, CONSCIENCE AND THE #421 - CAUSE OF REASON
We have recently observed from media reports of 22 JANUARY 2021,
conveying statements from GOOGLE Australia's managing director, Mel
Silva, who told a Senate committee that the proposed news code had the potential for: "Withdrawing our services from Australia [which] is the
last thing that Google want to have happen, especially when there is
another way forward.”
It is simply untenable that GOOGLE should show such a contempt towards
the TRINOMIAL ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY of our CONSTITUTION and
CITIZENSHIP IDEA TEMPLATE as the defining principle for a #322 - DEMOCRACY.
Similarly on 7 DECEMBER 2020, we conveyed to APPLE COMPUTER our "grave reservations about the repugnant past conduct of the INSURANCE
UNDERWRITER, where given the EXTRAORDINARY COST TO OURSELVES in pursuing
just outcomes to FOUR insurance claims related to damages perpetuated in
the unconstitutional / unlawful advancement of an ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018 JINGOISTIC REPUBLICANISM, that we must prudently consider on the basis
of VOID AB INITIO that the APPLECARE+ INSURANCE CONTRACT is
dishonourable and not worth the paper it is written on."
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
