• multispirit individuals

    From David Dalton@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 10 03:02:49 2020
    XPost: alt.religion.shamanism, alt.native, nz.soc.maori

    Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
    Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
    eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
    to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
    The latest theory takes into account transgendered
    and multispirit (who I define differently from
    transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
    individuals.

    For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
    deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
    non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
    God as "it". However I am considering switching to
    the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
    and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

    --
    David Dalton dalton@nfld.com http://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
    "And the cart is on a wheel/And the wheel is on a hill/And the
    hill is shifting sand/And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Dalton@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 10 18:32:03 2020
    XPost: alt.religion.shamanism, alt.native, nz.soc.maori

    On Apr 10, 2020, David Dalton wrote
    (in
    article<dalton.nfld-E40715.03024910042020@reader02.eternal-september.org>):

    Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
    Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
    eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
    to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
    The latest theory takes into account transgendered
    and multispirit (who I define differently from
    transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
    individuals.

    For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
    deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
    non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
    God as "it". However I am considering switching to
    the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
    and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

    and can be identified with by everyone

    Perhaps I should use God/dess but I find that awkward, and
    if the word actor can be gender nonspecific I think the
    word God can as well.

    --
    David Dalton dalton@nfld.com http://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
    "And the cart is on a wheel/And the wheel is on a hill/And the
    hill is shifting sand/And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From azigni@21:1/5 to David Dalton on Sat Apr 11 21:42:39 2020
    XPost: alt.religion.shamanism, alt.native, nz.soc.maori

    On 4/9/20 11:32 PM, David Dalton wrote:
    Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
    Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
    eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
    to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
    The latest theory takes into account transgendered
    and multispirit (who I define differently from
    transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
    individuals.

    For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
    deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
    non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
    God as "it". However I am considering switching to
    the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
    and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

    I do not think you can go wrong with either approach? We try to define a
    thing by our limited understanding of it. Perhaps the same as a pet
    (mammal) trying to define its owner.

    If we were able understand how our pet defines us in its world view, its understanding of us, would likely be acceptable to us, as the pet is
    doing the best it can with its limited information and understanding.

    The same applies to your approach of defining God. Whatever perspective
    you choose to use, is correct for you. We can not understand what we
    cannot understand, for whatever reasons.

    If we knew how our pet defines us, we would be satisfied with its
    conclusion, and would spend too much time trying to grow its perspective
    of us. So we are back to, it is your choice of how you define God. I
    don't think there is a wrong answer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Dalton@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 14 19:14:47 2020
    XPost: alt.religion.shamanism, alt.native, nz.soc.maori

    On Apr 10, 2020, David Dalton wrote
    (in
    article<dalton.nfld-E40715.03024910042020@reader02.eternal-september.org>):

    Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my
    Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of
    eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back
    to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).
    The latest theory takes into account transgendered
    and multispirit (who I define differently from
    transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)
    individuals.

    For the theists on here, currently I consider my top
    deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be
    non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my
    God as "it". However I am considering switching to
    the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics
    and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)

    Here is a brief summary of the eight harmonics theory for those
    who, like me, are reluctant to click on links in a Usenet newsgroup
    post, especially http rather than https:

    I have a theory of four orientations (purestraight, gay/lesbian, bisexual
    by nature, and fourth orientation compatible only with bisexual by
    nature of the opposite gender) and two spiritual genders, so effectively
    eight harmonics (1M, 2M, 3M, 4M, 1F, 2F, 3F, 4F). However one
    must also be careful to watch for transgender cases (e.g. 1MT would
    be spiritually purestraight male in a female body) and multispirit
    individuals, which I define not as transgender but as individuals
    with more than one harmonic, generally equal number of male
    and female harmonics, and usually two-spirit, e.g. 3F/2MT, but
    I did come across one four-spirit individual, 1M/2M/1FT/2FT,
    compatible with everyone other than 4F and 4M, so far, and a
    3M/3FT or 3F/3MT would be at least partially compatible with
    everybody, and if there was an eight-spirit individual they would
    be optimally compatible with everyone, as would a 1M/1F/3M/3F.

    When I say bisexual by nature I mean someone who feels
    sexual attraction to both genders, but can be honestly either
    bisexual, straight, celibate, or gay/lesbian by lifestyle choice.
    When I say partially compatible I mean less likely to
    stick, so a 1M is optimally compatible with a 1F but
    only partially compatible with a 3F, and I think also
    that a 3F is only partially compatible with a 3M but
    is optimally compatible with a 4M, 3F, or 2F.

    I base my theory partly on my own sexual attractions (I think
    I am 4M) but I also used it, with at least one confirmed 1M/3FT
    result, when I thought I had a matchmaking siddhi (paranormal
    ability) from late March 8 to early March 20, 2019, which
    I hope will return someday. When I say above that I came
    across a 1M/2M/1FT/2FT, that was using my ability on a
    picture and it has not yet been confirmed. And through
    what I call assisted shaktipat I have been trying to pass
    on the ability to at least a million individuals worldwide,
    who should benefit from my theory. But if not, the theory
    should be able to be researched and applied through surveys.
    The confusing part is that many who are bisexual by nature
    are straight by lifestyle choice, and some gay/lesbian (sexually
    attracted to just the same gender) are dishonestly (although
    unfortunately forced in some cases) trying to be bisexual or straight.

    I do not believe there are asexuals, though a 4M who has had
    no experience yet with 3F might think that he is.

    --
    David Dalton dalton@nfld.com http://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
    "And the cart is on a wheel/And the wheel is on a hill/And the
    hill is shifting sand/And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)