XPost: aus.politics, uk.legal, aus.legal
XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism
dolf <
dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
That Daniel is responding to a message of 3 years ago is reasonable cause
to believe that he is a ANZAC CENTENNIAL JINGOISTIC REPUBLICANIST who has
yet to face his accountability for #252 - HITLER equivalence as skeleton in the closet.
-- SETTING THE FOUNDATION FOR #491 - AGENCY FUTURE PRODUCTIVITY GAINS BY A PARADIGM OF GNOSIS --> SCENARIO --> DIEGESIS (narration) --> MIMESIS (to imitate) AND WHY THE WOMEN'S MARCH FOR JUSTICE TODAY IS INFERTILITY
Daniel65 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
de chucka wrote on 21/2/18 3:00 pm:
On 21/02/2018 2:47 PM, Ördög wrote:
It was written iJones:
FMurtz
It is not our group, anyone can join in but it is funny when illiterate >>>>>> Americans who can not read mistakenly think we are in Austin Texas. >>>>>
Awww, come on... we know it's Austin, Minnesota... home of the greatest >>>>> delicacy on the planet: Spam!
Oh shock, oh horror!
Although...using cans of spam for target shooting I would look on as a >>>> valid and socially quite acceptable use for exercising your gun-rights. >>>>
;)
After the other SPAM thread I thought about buying some, next time I'm
at the shops I will. I can't remember it being that bad
I don't know that I've ever had 'Spam', ..... but I can remember, as a
kid, having "Camp Pie" (meat in a tin that you opened by winding a key
around the top).
Is "Camp Pie" similar to "Spam"?? (The former English, the later U.S. of
A., maybe!)
-- SETTING THE FOUNDATION FOR #491 - AGENCY FUTURE PRODUCTIVITY GAINS BY A PARADIGM OF GNOSIS --> SCENARIO --> DIEGESIS (narration) --> MIMESIS (to imitate) AND WHY THE WOMEN'S MARCH FOR JUSTICE TODAY IS INFERTILITY
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 15 March, 2021
The FIRM (ER II) is the #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as the foundation to
our civil society which fosters the #68 - right of @1 - self to be endowed
of #492 - voluntary free will by nature / nurture of the various #491 - agencies such as police, ambulance, state emergency services et al.
Our epistemological premise for GNOSIS (γνῶσις) is then:
[γ,ν,ῶ,σ,ι,ς]
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #390 - CROWN
<
https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Superseding%20Letters%20Patent%2020201107.pdf>
GRUMBLE (#238 - TO SET IN MOTION, START, #210 - TO CHOOSE, ELECT, DECIDE FOR)@[3, 3, 53, 50, 43, 71, 81, 38, 10, 10, 48, 38]
GRUNTLE (#421 - CAUSE OF REASON, #448 - TO ASK, REQUEST / TO DESIRE, DEMAND)@[3, 3, 6, 3, 59, 53, 28, 50, 71, 43, 61, 71, 61, 81, 18, 38, 28,
10, 38, 10, 5, 48, 43, 38]
Our epistemological premise for SCENARIO (σενάριο) is then:
[σ,ε,ν,ά,ρ,ι,ο]
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #180 - TO KNOW BY EXPERIENCE
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #398 - TO BE LIBERATED, BE SAVED, BE DELIVERED / RECOVERY OF KNOWLEDGE BY RECOLLECTION
GRUMBLE (#211 - CAUSE / MANNER / REASON, #193 - TO CALL (TO ONE'S AID) /
PUT ONE'S MIND UPON A THING)
GRUNTLE (#627 - TEACHING / INSTRUCTION, #404 - DECREE / EDICT / COMMISSION
/ LAW / RULE)
<
https://www.grapple369.com/gnosis/scenario.json>
Since our data will be a {} diégesis (“narration”) object that can be passed up the chain of #491 - agency command and deployed by a #473 - SENTENTIAL (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE) as facilitator / arbitrator of #492 - voluntary free by recommendation of mimesis (“to imitate”) we will need to ensure that our seminal concept has sufficient coherence for its
organisational needs.
"YET LET NO MAN STRIVE, NOR REPROVE ANOTHER: FOR THY PEOPLE ARE AS THEY
THAT STRIVE WITH THE PRIEST. THEREFORE SHALT THOU FALL IN THE DAY, AND THE PROPHET ALSO SHALL FALL WITH THEE IN THE NIGHT, AND I WILL DESTROY THY
MOTHER.
#130 -*GLOBUS* *CRUCIGER* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 15 MARCH 2021 as [#20, #70, #600] /
#115 - DIGNITY ROYAL as [#5, #70, #600] = ʻam (H5971): {UMBRA: #110 % #41 = #28} 1) nation, people; 1a) people, nation; 1b) persons, members of one's people, compatriots, country-men; 2) kinsman, kindred;
MY *PEOPLE*-H5971 ARE DESTROYED FOR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE:
<
https://www.grapple369.com/images/GNOSIS-SCENARIO-DIEGESIS%20%28narration%29-MIMESIS%20%28to%20imitate%29%201.png>
<
https://www.grapple369.com/images/GNOSIS-SCENARIO-DIEGESIS%20%28narration%29-MIMESIS%20%28to%20imitate%29%202.png>
<
https://www.grapple369.com/images/GNOSIS-SCENARIO-DIEGESIS%20%28narration%29-MIMESIS%20%28to%20imitate%29%203.png>
BECAUSE THOU HAST REJECTED KNOWLEDGE, I *WILL* *ALSO* *REJECT* *THEE*, THAT THOU SHALT BE NO PRIEST TO ME: SEEING THOU HAST FORGOTTEN THE LAW OF THY
GOD, I *WILL* *ALSO* *FORGET* *THY* *CHILDREN*.
AS THEY WERE INCREASED, SO THEY SINNED AGAINST ME: THEREFORE WILL I CHANGE THEIR GLORY INTO SHAME. THEY EAT UP THE SIN OF MY PEOPLE, AND THEY SET
THEIR HEART ON THEIR INIQUITY.
AND THERE SHALL BE, LIKE PEOPLE, LIKE PRIEST: AND I WILL PUNISH THEM FOR
THEIR WAYS, AND REWARD THEM THEIR DOINGS. FOR THEY SHALL EAT, AND NOT HAVE ENOUGH: THEY SHALL COMMIT WHOREDOM, AND SHALL NOT INCREASE: BECAUSE THEY
HAVE LEFT OFF TO TAKE HEED TO THE LORD.
WHOREDOM AND WINE AND NEW WINE TAKE AWAY THE HEART. MY PEOPLE ASK COUNSEL
AT THEIR STOCKS, AND THEIR STAFF DECLARETH UNTO THEM: FOR THE SPIRIT OF WHOREDOMS HATH CAUSED THEM TO ERR, AND THEY HAVE GONE A WHORING FROM UNDER THEIR GOD." [Hosea 4:4-12]
Whilst our semantical nuance will make use of the tree structure conforming
to a "synaptic process permitting the scenario object to then be passed
along and actioned relative to the metalogic autonomous delimiter #CENTRE
as the transformative objective" and accordingly we ought to consider that
the SCENARIO is then:
1) A TYPE: nnn <-- eg: SCENARIO
2) Having a FORM: nnn <-- *POLICE* *FORM* NO for example
3) Given an INSTANCE: nnnn <-- 17 digit date/time stamp + 3 count or
randomised
4) With a locus accessible by path <-- As nomenclature
5) Then it has an UNLIMITED potential.
GNOSIS.scenario.directory = {
"name": "Scenarios",
"children": [
{"name": "New vEvent", type: SCENARIO_EVENT, form: null, time:
null, path: "Scenarios"} <-- *New* *vEvent*
],
type: SCENARIO_ROOT,
form: 0,
time: GNOSIS.scenario.id,
path: "Scenarios"
}
Our initiating processing is a diégesis (“narration”) --> mimesis (“to imitate”) actionable outcome
Ancient Greek διήγησις (diḗgēsis, “narration”), from διηγέομαι (diēgéomai,
“I narrate”)
From Ancient Greek μῑ́μησις (mī́mēsis), from μιμεῖσθαι (mimeîsthai, “to
imitate”), from μῖμος (mîmos, “a mime”).
[δ, {@1: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4)}
ι, {@2: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#18); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#14)}
η, {@3: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#40); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#22)}
γ, {@4: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#65); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#25)}
η, {@5: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#98 - *SUSTENANCE* / *MAINTENANCE* / *RENEWAL* / *COMMUNITY*); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#33)}
ς, {@6: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#71 - *WORLDVIEW* / *STOPPAGE*)}
ι, {@7: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#250 - *TO* *SHAPE*, *FORM*, *FASHION*, *CREATE*); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#81 - SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE / TRANSCRIPTASE)}
ς] {@8: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#288 - #48 - PROTOCOLS (LI) x #6 - FORMULATION OF PROGRESSION (LI)); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#119 -
*NEEDING* *HELP*)}
TELOS TOTAL: #443 - *TO* *BE* *ENUMERATED*
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #169
MALE: @169 = #169
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #538 - *TO* *SEEK* / *ENQUIRE*
MALE: @98 + @169 = #267
FEME: @71 + @81 + @119 = #271 - *TO* *COMMAND* / *AVOW* / *AVOUCH*
GRUMBLE (#288 - #48 - PROTOCOLS (LI) x #6 - FORMULATION OF PROGRESSION
(LI), #119 - *NEEDING* *HELP*)@[4, 4, 14, 10, 22, 8, 25, 3, 33, 8, 71, 38,
81, 10, 38, 38]
GRUNTLE (#539 - *FIDELITY* / *STEADFASTNESS*, #407 - 'OTH *CYCLE*: #1092 x
2 = #2184 - *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING* *AND* *ASSISTING* *UNTO* *OUR* *GOVERNOR* *GENERAL*)@[4, 4, 8, 4, 22, 14, 32, 10, 54, 22, 62, 8, 6, 25, 9, 3, 42, 33,
50, 8, 40, 71, 78, 38, 78, 81, 7, 10, 45, 38, 2, 38]
For example this ought to enable a query condition of where the TELOS value #237 - USE OF FORCE is concerned with an intersection of #265 - KEY as quintessential concepts ...
THERE ARE ACTUALLY #SIX - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION INTERSECTIONS WHICH WILL INTEREST US FOR FURTHER STRATEGIC INTER-OPERABILITY ALLIANCE AGREEMENT OPPORTUNITY
ZRC NOUS PROTOTYPE ONTIC DIALECTIC
2.7.6 #29 GENIUS @168, @192
2.8.5 #21 GENIUS @158, @175, @197
3.8.4 #60 TORAH @86, @180
4.7.1 #26 HETEROS @148, @173
4.8.7 #3 GENIUS @86, @86, @102, @177
5.6.5 #77 GENIUS @146, @102
[@168, @192, @158, @175, @197, @86, @180, @148, @173, @86, @86, @102, @177, @146, @102]
[@168, {@1: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#6); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#6)}
@192, {@2: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#42); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#36)}
@158, {@3: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#74); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
(#113)}
@175, {@4: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#119); Ego: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG
(#126)}
@197, {@5: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#199); Ego: 35 - GATHERING:
LIEN (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9})}
@86, {@6: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#203); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11})}
@180, {@7: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#225); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#184 -
I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36})}
@148, {@8: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#233); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI
(#251)}
@173, {@9: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#252); Ego: 11 -
DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#262)}
@86, {@10: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#276); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#267)}
@86, {@11: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#305); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL:
SHAO (#272)}
@102, {@12: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#355); Ego: 21 - RELEASE:
SHIH (#293)}
@177, {@13: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#420); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#308)}
@146, {@14: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#469); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#373)}
@102] {@15: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#539); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#394)}
GRUMBLE (#539 - *FIDELITY*, *STEADFASTNESS*, #394 - *TO* *SUBJECT*,
*SUBDUE*, *FORCE*)@[6, 6, 36, 30, 32, 77, 45, 13, 80, 35, 4, 5, 22, 18, 8,
67, 19, 11, 24, 5, 29, 5, 50, 21, 65, 15, 49, 65, 70, 21]
#539 as [#2, #1, #40, #6, #50, #400, #600] = ʼĕmûwnâh (H530): {UMBRA: #102 % #41 = #20} 1) firmness, *FIDELITY*, *STEADFASTNESS*, steadiness;
#322 - *DEMOCRACY* as [#20, #2, #300] /
#334 - *PERSECUTION* as [#6, #20, #2, #300, #6] /
#394 as [#6, #10, #20, #2, #10, #300, #6, #600] = kâbash (H3533): {UMBRA:
#322 % #41 = #35} 1) *TO* *SUBJECT*, *SUBDUE*, *FORCE*, keep under, bring
into bondage; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to bring into bondage, make subservient; 1a2)
to subdue, force, violate; 1a3) to subdue, dominate, tread down; 1b)
(Niphal) to be subdued; 1c) (Piel) to subdue; 1d) (Hiphil) to bring into bondage;
And accordingly, unless there is some advice to the contrary, such
descriptive context will be our self-education and informal research approach...
const SCENARIO_ROOT = 0;
const SCENARIO_CONCEPT = 1;
const SCENARIO_EVENT = 2;
case ("allScenarios") :
var allScenarios = {
}
var path = false;
var selector = "";
GNOSIS.scenario.hierarchy.eachBefore((n) => {
switch ("undefined") {
case (typeof n) :
case (typeof n.data) :
case (typeof n.data.path) :
path = false;
break;
default:
/^(([^/]+\/)*)(.*)$/.test(n.data.path);
switch (true) {
case (RegExp.$1 == "") :
selector = RegExp.$3;
break;
case (RegExp.$1 == RegExp.$2) :
default :
selector = RegExp.$2 + RegExp.$3;
}
path = true;
}
if (path) {
switch (n.data.type) {
case (SCENARIO_ROOT) :
case (SCENARIO_CONCEPT) :
allScenarios[n.data.time] = selector
}
path = false;
}
});
this["@WIDGET"].allScenarios = {
type: "select1",
title: "All Available Scenarios",
values: [allScenarios],
value: (this.focus) ? this.focus : 0,
onchange: function (ev) {
GNOSIS.boek.concepts.jackFrameScenario.focus = d3.select(this).property("value");
}
}
}
Before we then proceed to populating our scenario {} object with data,
there needs be a consideration whether the capacity to toggle between an <input> text field or a combo select option to convey the relevant
SCENARIO, is then considered as a LIMITED or UNLIMITED possibility.
What I mean by that as only an informal research self educational
possibility in terms of our fire evacuee situation, where I have no
operational sapient knowledge as expertise other than news media.
One must be cautious of the media's capacity to "manufacture consent". A consensus {ie. a general agreement of opinion or view} occurs with
sufficient inputs: "The Blind Men and the Elephant" by John G. Saxe (read
by Tom O'Bedlam)
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJVBQefNXIw>
If I have never been subject to media concepts of a "railway line" existing
in Israel, I might wrongly think otherwise.
Thus our LIMITED notion might be considered as a SCENARIO of a fire as a singular or flat notion.
But if I enable the semantical nuance as usage of the tree structure where
I then consider that the SCENARIO is a TYPE: nnn of a particular FORM: nnn having an instance: nnnn within a locus accessible by path then it has an UNLIMITED potential:
SCENARIO/fires/Benalla
SCENARIO/fires/Rainbow Creek
SCENARIO/recovery/Benalla
And then I would require the combo select option which conveys the relevant SCENARIO to convey sufficient information as to convey a proper distinction
so as to make a distinction.
Lastly is the consideration, that if I make an improper data entry relative
to the SCENARIO pathname, that there needs be some mechanism to correct it.
Thus I think that we ought give some thought to a TREE maintenance mode.
Suffice to say, that we ought to tomorrow work on propagating our directory PATH and designate its TYPE: nnn within an instance: nnnn handle.
SCENARIO/fires/Benalla
Following that our next task is then to define our scenario {} object so as
to then enable the "Toggle Scenario Impetus" process to occur with actual
data.
<
https://www.grapple369.com>
Initial Post: 15 March 2021
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<
http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
