XPost: soc.culture.scottish, alt.fan.countries.poland, alt.fan.countries.hungary
XPost: alt.fan.countries.vatican-city

-- METHODOLOGICAL SELF-DETERMINATION AS AUTOGENIC THOUGHTS STEERING
MORPHOGENIC KNOTS

(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 August, 2021

Before we continue with the implementation of our noetic lexicon
navigation within the GRUMBLE prototype, we ought to make a self
educated appraisal of a research chapter from the International Journal
of Technoethics and a scholarly book so as to make an accommodation of
ideas expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of experience:

- The Technoethical Ethos of Technic Self-Deterimination by Francesco A.
B. Cortese (2016)
- The Electromagnetic Brain by Shelli Joye (2020)

As introduction we find on pages 5 & 6 this comment relevant to our
*ONTIC* understanding of @1 - SELF, #492 - FREEWILL and #491 - AGENCY
(ie. @84, @86, @102, @104, @115)

Cortese (2016) says "Our position implicit within the thesis of this
paper falls within compatibilism. Indeed, we contend that freewill is
not only compatible with determinism – but that determinism is actually
a necessary precondition for free will (which we will use synonymously
in this paper with autonomy and self- determination).

If such means of partial determination (and thus of partial
self-determination) WERE AVAILABLE DURING THE *MILLENNIA* (as especially
two) IN WHICH THE SEEMING INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN FREE WILL AND CAUSAL DETERMINISM BECAME ENTRENCHED WITHIN THE WESTERN PHILOSOPHICAL
TRADITION, then it is likely that the dilemma of determinism wouldn't
have posed such an unquestionable affront to the *ONTIC* legitimacy of
our autonomy and agency."

Causal determinism is, roughly speaking, the idea that every event is necessitated by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws
of nature:

CONCEPTUAL ISSUES IN DETERMINISM
2.1 The World (kosmos)
2.2 The way things are at a time
2.3 Thereafter
2.4 Laws of nature
2.5 Fixed

Fixed determinism requires a world that (a) has a well-defined state or description, at any given time, and (b) laws of nature that are true at
all places and times. If we have all these, then if (a) and (b) together logically entail the state of the world at all other times (or, at
least, all times later than that given in (a)), the world is
deterministic. Logical entailment, in a sense broad enough to encompass mathematical consequence, is the modality behind the determination in “determinism.” <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/determinism-causal>

The idea is ancient, but first became subject to clarification and
mathematical analysis in the eighteenth century.

Towards that end, we are currently at the vCognition vantage point of
the GRAPPLE@[21,43,60,65,66,69,71,72,81] HEURISTIC considering the
NOETIC LEXICON COGNITION {IDEA #206 - môwʻêd (H4150): *APPOINTED*
*TIME*; *SACRED* *SEASON* AS #THREE / #342 AS #FOUR - PYTHAGOREAN
ONOMANTIC PROTOTYPE #SIX - ROMAN / #FIVE - TORAH} and our intention is
to then evolve the visualization as each of these LEXICON / NOETIC
concepts of "GOD THE CENTRE OF VALUE THEORY WITHIN THEOLOGY" within the sectarian #71 - WORLDVIEW of either or collectively:

    ⁃    ALLAHU AKBAR (God is Great)
    ⁃    DEUS VULT (God wills it)
    ⁃    DIEU ET MON DROIT (God and my right)

By such notions as STRONGS reference dârash (H1875): {UMBRA: #504 % #41
= #12} 1a2) *TO* *CONSULT*, *ENQUIRE* *OF*, *SEEK*; i) *OF* *GOD*;

<div>
    <span name="0">H1875</span>
</div>

In whatsoever manner available:

H1875 (דרשנו):

which is infinitely expandable."

Whereas the result having four {value: [70, 10, 5, 57], position: [5, 6,
7, 3], type: 128} of nine grapple [] array value elements by a COINRULES.library.intersectGrappleArray([2, 70, 10, 71, 9, 8, 38, 5,
57], [4, 4, 81, 57, 55, 70, 10, 5, 72]) action ought to convey some
sensibility to us that the values array: [70, 10, 5, 57] were matched
within positions [5, 6, 7, 3] and were a sequential match within nous #5
- KEEPING SMALL (SHAO) being position 7 of the grapple [] array.

The philosophical consideration on "#902 - AUTOS + #68 - RIGHTS {#33,
#17, #18} = #970 - NOMOS" is an exemplar concern for HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY.

Cortese (2016, p 3) in agreeing with others (Smart and Haldane, 2003)
rejects the indeterminist notion that our immersive interoperability
within the world (kosmos) is subject to a "QUANTUM MECHANICAL TRIGGER"
which motivates our freedom towards any will to action.

Although Cortese (2016, p 14) considers that writing can be categorized
as technique he asserts that without the technological infrastructure of something to write with and something to write on, one would be
hard-pressed to employ it.

My concern with such a notion is that the objects of perception are here written words as Cortese's chapter on Technic Self-Determination to be
precise with the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC at the time of reading and
contemplation:

INSTANTIATED @ 1510 HOURS ON 23 AUGUST 2021 GIVES TEMPORAL HEURISTIC AS GRAPPLE@[#78, #71, #7, #40, #25, #18, #10, #19, #61] PROTOTYPE:

#THREE: #126 as #45 - GREATNESS (TA)
#FOUR: #203 as #41 - RESPONSE (YING)
#FIVE: #329 as #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO

    #327 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 AUGUST 2021 as
[#3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] /
#770 as [#3, #100, #1, #500, #70, #40, #5, #50, #1] = gráphō (G1125):
{UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with reference to the form of
the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters on a tablet, parchment,
paper, or other material; 2) to write, with reference to the contents of
the writing; 2a) to express in written characters; 2b) to commit to
writing (things not to be forgotten), write down, record; 2c) used of
those things which stand written in the sacred books (of the OT); 2d) to
write to one, i.e. by writing (in a written epistle) to give
information, directions; 3) to fill with writing; 4) to draw up in
writing, compose;

Whilst fixed determinism requires a well-defined state or description of
the world and compliance to laws of nature that are true at all places
and times, Kant however within IDEA @225 of his Prolegomena (1783)
suggests that time in itself cannot be perceived: "All appearances are
in time, in which, as substratum (as the persisting form of inner
intuition), simultaneous existence as well as succession can alone be represented. Therefore time, in which every change in the appearances is
to be thought, remains and does not change; for in it alone can
successive or simultaneous existence be represented, as its
determinations. Now time in itself cannot be perceived.

Consequently, in the objects of perception, i.e., in the appearances, a substratum must be found that represents time in general and in which
all change or simultaneous existence can be perceived through the
relation of the appearances to it in apprehension. But substance – the substratum of everything real, i.e., of everything belonging to the
existence of things – is that in which every- thing that belongs to
existence can be thought only as a determination. Consequently, that
which persists – in relation to which alone all time- relations of the appearances can be determined – is the substance in the appearances,
i.e., the real in them, which as the substratum of all change remains
always the same. Since this therefore cannot change in existence, its
quantum in nature can also be neither increased nor diminished.
[Prolegomena, p 183]

As we explore this chapter further, we'll need to consider whether a
noumenon based "quantum mechanical trigger" is a self-modulating
characteristic to "an ontology of self-determination".

Cortese (2016, p 3) further states that the dichotomy of determinism as
a false free-will dilemma was engendered for millennia and established
within the western philosophical as perennial tradition.

And this we have explained is probably due to the basis of that
dogmatism as perennial school of thinking having a foundational reliance
upon the STOICHEION elements as #45 - METHODOLOGY of RELIGIONISTS and
which is dogmatically (ie. whether #1827 - Eucharist or Hajj as purposed
life) and existentially #5 - centred upon the #9 - PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY
as an institutional basis for its economy, in that it thereby conveys an extrusion of being having an inherent antagonism (ie. WEAK-asthenḗs
(G772) and BEGGARLY-ptōchós (G4434) ELEMENTS-stoicheîon (G4747)):

ENHANCER OR SUBJUGATOR?

#1 #2 #3
#8 #9 #4
#7 #6 #5

v's

#2 #9 #4
#7 #5 #3
#6 #1 #8

"BUT NOW, AFTER THAT YE HAVE KNOWN GOD, OR RATHER ARE KNOWN OF GOD, HOW
TURN YE AGAIN TO THE WEAK-asthenḗs (G772) AND BEGGARLY-ptōchós (G4434) ELEMENTS-stoicheîon (G4747), WHEREUNTO YE DESIRE AGAIN TO BE IN BONDAGE?

#1 + #21 + #41 + #61 = #124

#124 as [#70, #4, #50] = ʻiddân (H5732): {UMBRA: #124 % #41 = #1} 1)
time; 1a) *TIME* (*OF* *DURATION*); 1b) *YEAR*;

    #200 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#6, #30, #40, #70, #4, #10, #600] / [#30, #40, #6, #70, #4, #10, #600] /
#206 - NOETIC LEXICON vCOGNITION as [#6, #30, #40, #6, #70, #4, #10,
#600] /
#124 as [#40, #70, #4, #10] = môwʻêd (H4150): {UMBRA: #120 % #41 = #38}
1) appointed place, appointed time, meeting; 1a) appointed time; 1a1)
appointed time (general); 1a2) *SACRED* *SEASON*, *SET* *FEAST*,
*APPOINTED* *SEASON*; 1b) appointed meeting; 1c) appointed place; 1d)
appointed sign or signal; 1e) tent of meeting;

#124 as [#70, #30, #10, #3, #1, #10] = olígos (G3641): {UMBRA: #383 %
#41 = #14} 1) little, small, few; 1a) of number: multitude, quantity, or
size; 1b) *OF* *TIME*: *SHORT*; 1c) of degree or intensity: light, slight;

    #59 as [#9, #5, #30, #5, #10] /
#124 as [#9, #5, #30, #70, #10] = thélō (G2309): {UMBRA: #844 % #41 =
#24} 1) *TO* *WILL*, *HAVE* *IN* *MIND*, *INTEND*; 1a) to be resolved or determined, to purpose; 1b) to desire, to wish; 1c) to love; 1c1) to
like to do a thing, be fond of doing; 1d) to take delight in, have pleasure;

YE OBSERVE DAYS, AND MONTHS, AND TIMES-kairós (G2540), AND YEARS.

#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31

#1 - 21 DECEMBER
#21 - 21 MARCH
#41 - 21 JUNE
#61 - 23 SEPTEMBER

#401 - ʼârar (H779): TO CURSE as [#20, #1, #10, #100, #70, #200] =
kairós (G2540): {UMBRA: #401 % #41 = #32} 1) due measure; 2) a measure
of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:; 2a) a fixed and
definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive
epoch waited for; 2b) opportune or seasonable time; 2c) the right time;
2d) a limited period of time; 2e) to what time brings, the state of the
times, the things and events of time;

I AM AFRAID FOR YOU, LEST I HAVE BESTOWED UPON YOU LABOUR IN VAIN."
[Galatians 4:9-11]

Todd E. Feinberg and Jon Mallatt within "Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap" gives us a clue as to the
causality pertaining to the role of emergence in the creation of
consciousness that has been debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal consciousness:

46 41 48
47 45 43
42 49 44 = #135 / #405 {FIRE - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS NORTH}

42 47 46
49 45 41
44 43 48 = #135 / #405 {EARTH - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS EAST}

44 49 42
43 45 47
48 41 46 = #135 / #405 {AIR - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN* *ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS SOUTH}

48 48 44
41 45 49
46 47 42 = #135 / #405 {WATER - *ACCORDING* *TO* *PYTHAGOREAN*
*ONOMANTIC* *BELIEF* AS WEST}

In making a nomenclature consideration of #45 - METHODOLOGY the #CENTRE
of value PROPOSITION is that any DELIMITER is relative to the AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE, thereby as a METATHEORY OF LOGIC is a stratum as dialectic of meta-descriptor prototypes which always precedes it.

#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9 - PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE {4+5 =
#9, 1+3+5 = #9, 4+0+5 = #9}

Whereas the SAPIENT OPINION FROM AN EXPERT and those of the IGNORANT POSTULATIONS OF STUPIDITY might both direct themselves to the same PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER, the dialectic of meta-descriptor prototypes can
yield entirely different results which may be vital or may not satisfy
our contingent need for a STATIC conception with an inclusion of any
ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE with deference to the resultant CATEGORY
OF UNDERSTANDING such as for example #432 - DEVOID OF TRUTH OR USELESS
which is then associated to our STATIC conception.

In case you thought that our postulation on whether a noumenon based
"quantum mechanical trigger" is a self-modulating characteristic to "an ontology of self-determination" was spurious opportunism and specious rumination, we then @ 0810 hours the following day made a consideration
of error and obtained the following temporal heuristic:

INSTANTIATED @ 0810 HOURS ON 24 AUGUST 2021 GRAPPLE@[#29, #63, #80, #81,
#65, #1, #2, #11, #53] PROTOTYPE

#THREE: #181 as #19 - FOLLOWING (TS'UNG)
#FOUR: #204 as #42 - GOING TO MEET (YING)
#FIVE: #385 as #61 - EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)

    #200 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#6, #10, #80, #100, #4] / [#80, #100, #6, #4, #10] /
    #210 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as [#80, #100, #4, #6, #500] /
#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE as [#6, #5, #80, #100, #10, #4] = pâqad (H6485): {UMBRA: #184 % #41 = #20} 1) to attend to, muster, number,
reckon, visit, punish, appoint, look after, care for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
pay attention to, observe; 1a2) to attend to; 1a3) to seek, look about
for; 1a4) *TO* *SEEK* *IN* *VAIN*, *NEED*, *MISS*, *LACK*; 1a5) to
visit; 1a6) to visit upon, punish; 1a7) to pass in review, muster,
number; 1a8) to appoint, assign, lay upon as a charge, deposit; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be sought, be needed, be missed, be lacking; 1b2) to
be visited; 1b3) to be visited upon; 1b4) to be appointed; 1b5) to be
watched over; 1c) (Piel) to muster, call up; 1d) (Pual) *TO* *BE*
*PASSED* *IN* *REVIEW*, *BE* *CAUSED* *TO* *MISS*, *BE* *CALLED*, *BE*
*CALLED* *TO* *ACCOUNT*; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to set over, make overseer,
appoint an overseer; 1e2) to commit, entrust, commit for care, deposit;
1f) (Hophal); 1f1) to be visited; 1f2) to be deposited; 1f3) to be made overseer, be entrusted; 1g) (Hithpael) numbered; 1h) (Hothpael)
numbered; 2) musterings, expenses;

However we must offer a caveat here and that is, our informal research
opinions are self education responses to the semantics from experts and
must be subjected to the rigour of independent peer review. Our goal
therefore is not to critique Cortese's paper on an ontology of self determination having a timeless human drive towards HUMAN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGY (*HET*) but rather to proffer an accommodation of ideas
expressed therein and as syncretism progress my own semantics of
experience as informal research into GNOSIS EX MACHINA.

We note that QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT has both an ONTIC
technological basis (ie. the ONTIC intersection of #205 (#124 + #81) and
#164) associated with FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS to #492-voluntary
freewill that is not only a doorway to the legislative framework which
is in and of itself an immense opportunity, namely:

a) A neural linguistic capability which by reverse transcriptase as
TETRAD is able to define rules based quantum;

b) The FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS to #492-VOLUNTARY FREEWILL relative to
the ontology of @1 - SELF, provides a paradigm method for self modulation;

c) The noumenon is an ontic / sapient framework:

@123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY
@164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
@205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE

d) QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT redacted to an ONTIC technological
paradigm is then the basis for a sapient / knowledge based economy where
both the INTERNET OF THINGS and HUMAN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGY can
function as a franchised autonomy (#902 - AUTOS + #68 {#33, #17, #18} -
RIGHTS = #970 - NOMOS) having a "distinct modality of self-determination"

Whereby we envision that a sapient / knowledge based economy will enable sovereign states to leverage taxation / transaction revenue on a
proportional basis which is derived from a global pool of usage.

Our subsequent discourse will be on Cortese's use of the word
téchnē-G5078 which we understand with respects to GNOSIS EX MACHINA
(Godhead) as being an attribute of anthropology (homo[ios] sapien[s | t]):

"FORASMUCH THEN AS WE ARE THE OFFSPRING OF GOD, WE OUGHT NOT TO THINK
THAT THE GODHEAD IS LIKE UNTO GOLD, OR SILVER, OR STONE, GRAVEN BY
ART-G5078 AND MAN'S DEVICE." [Acts 17:29]

ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES

#1) APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA)

#2) DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)

#3) POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900)

#4) APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE)

#5) EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK
LEXICON ENTRIES

#6) APOGRÁPHŌ: G583 (@86 - ACCORDING TO LAW)

#7) ARÉTĒ: G703 (@102 - ETHICAL / MORAL ACTION as @113 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION BY #45 - METHODOLOGY + #68 - RIGHTS CONFORMITY)

#8) TÉCHNĒ: G5078 (@171 - TECHNIC SELF-DETERMINATION)

    #VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
    #TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
    #POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
    #TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
    #CANON: #171

TOTAL ONTIC CONCEPT:

@150 + @104 + #175 + @181 + @228 = #838

#838 + @86 + @102 + @171 = #1197 as [#5, #100, #100, #10, #7, #800, #40,
#5, #50, #70, #10] = rhizóō (G4492): {UMBRA: #987 % #41 = #3} 1) *TO*
*CAUSE* *TO* *STRIKE* *ROOT*, *TO* *STRENGTHEN* *WITH* *ROOTS*, *TO*
*RENDER* *FIRM*, *TO* *FIX*, *ESTABLISH*, cause a person or a thing to
be thoroughly grounded;

"ROOTED-G4492 AND BUILT UP IN HIM, AND STABLISHED IN THE FAITH, AS YE
HAVE BEEN TAUGHT, ABOUNDING THEREIN WITH THANKSGIVING.

BEWARE LEST ANY MAN SPOIL YOU THROUGH PHILOSOPHY AND VAIN DECEIT, AFTER
THE TRADITION OF MEN, AFTER THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD (ie. stoicheion
of the kosmos) AND NOT AFTER CHRIST.

FOR IN HIM DWELLETH ALL THE FULNESS OF THE GODHEAD (cf: #592 is the
RIGHTS noumenon extent) BODILY." [Colossians 2:7-9]

ONTIC DERIVED #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER CONCEPT PROTOTYPES:

[150, 104, 175, 181, 228, 86, 102, 171]

[150, {@1: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#69); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#69)}
104, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#80); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#92)}
175, {@3: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#105)}
181, {@4: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#147); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
(#124)}
228, {@5: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22});
Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#190)}
86, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#208); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#195)}
102, {@7: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#262); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#216)}
171] {@8: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#325); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#225)}

GRUMBLE (#325 - *ROOT* / TOTAL MAGIC SUM (#65) FOR 5x5, #225 -
*QUEEN*)@[69, 69, 11, 23, 24, 13, 43, 19, 28, 66, 33, 5, 54, 21, 63, 9]

GRUNTLE (#816 - *ROOT*, #550 - *SOVEREIGN* *DOMINION*)@[69, 69, 57, 69,
68, 11, 10, 23, 34, 24, 47, 13, 9, 43, 28, 19, 56, 28, 41, 66, 74, 33,
79, 5, 52, 54, 73, 21, 55, 63, 64, 9]

#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70,
#9, #8] /
#325 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] =
paradídōmi (G3860): {UMBRA: #1050 % #41 = #25} 1) to give into the hands
(of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 2a) to deliver
to one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up
one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented,
put to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause
one to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 2d) to
commit, to commend; 2e) to deliver verbally; 2e1) commands, rites; 2e2)
to deliver by narrating, to report; 2f) to permit allow; 2f1) when the
fruit will allow that is when its ripeness permits; 2f2) gives itself
up, presents itself;

YOUTUBE: "GREGORIAN, AMELIA BRIGHTMAN - JOIN ME"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u-4EQP4kzk>

#168 - ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE as [#100, #10, #7, #1, #50] /
#325 as [#100, #10, #7, #8, #200] = rhíza (G4491): {UMBRA: #118 % #41 =
#36} 1) a *ROOT*; 2) that which like a root springs from a root, a
sprout, shoot; 3) metaph. offspring, progeny;

    #434 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 AUGUST 2021 as
[#7, #8, #200, #5, #200, #9, #5] /
#225 as [#7, #8, #10, #200] /
#325 as [#5, #7, #8, #300, #5] = záō (G2198): {UMBRA: #808 % #41 = #29}
1) to live, breathe, be among the living (not lifeless, not dead); 2) to
enjoy real life; 2a) to have true life and worthy of the name; 2b)
active, blessed, endless in the kingdom of God; 3) to live i.e. pass
life, in the manner of the living and acting; 3a) of mortals or
character; 4) living water, having vital power in itself and exerting
the same upon the soul; 5) metaph. to be in full vigour; 5a) to be
fresh, strong, efficient,; 5b) as adj. active, powerful, efficacious;

#225 as [#5, #3, #2, #10, #200, #5] = gᵉbîyrâh (H1377): {UMBRA: #220 %
#41 = #15} 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother;

#816 as [#300, #200, #300, #10, #6] / [#6, #300, #200, #300, #10] =
sheresh (H8328): {UMBRA: #800 % #41 = #21} 1) *ROOT*; 1a) root
(literal); 1b) root (of people involving firmness or permanence) (fig);
1c) root, bottom (as lowest stratum) (fig);

#816 as [#10, #300, #200, #300, #6] = shârash (H8327): {UMBRA: #800 %
#41 = #21} 1) to uproot, take root, deal with the roots; 1a) (Piel) to
root up, root out; 1b) (Pual) to be rooted up or out (of produce); 1c)
(Poel) to take root; 1d) (Poal) to take root; 1e) (Hiphil) to take root,
cause to take root;

#550 as [#40, #40, #30, #20, #400, #500] = mamlâkâh (H4467): {UMBRA:
#135 % #41 = #12} 1) kingdom, dominion, reign, sovereignty; 1a) kingdom,
realm; 1b) sovereignty, dominion; 1c) reign;

Thusly we might reasonably conclude that the impetus for the Apostle
Paul's (Hebrew of Hebrews / Pharisee) discourse as the Epistle to the
Romans is to preserve the Jewish claim of Sovereignty: “BOAST NOT
AGAINST THE BRANCHES. BUT IF THOU BOAST, THOU BEAREST NOT THE ROOT-rhíza (G4491), BUT THE ROOT-rhíza (G4491) THEE.

YOUTUBE: "Days of Elijah (No God Like Jehovah)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUIa674GGCo>

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjZ_IlP9c5A>

THOU WILT SAY THEN, THE BRANCHES WERE BROKEN OFF, THAT I MIGHT BE
GRAFTED IN.

WELL; BECAUSE OF UNBELIEF THEY WERE BROKEN OFF, AND THOU STANDEST BY
FAITH. BE NOT HIGH-MINDED, BUT FEAR:

REMEMBERING THE FARHUD: “Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible over 500
times, it is NEVER mentioned in the Quran, not once!”

DOLF: Jerusalem and the temple is mentioned in the book of Jubilees as
base-7 time divisions in relation to an exegesis of the 10 Commandments
and genealogy.

“THEN THE KING (AHASUERUS WHO REIGNED, FROM INDIA EVEN UNTO ETHIOPIA,
OVER AN HUNDRED AND TWENTY SEVEN PROVINCES) SAID TO THE WISE MEN, WHICH
KNEW THE *TIMES*, (FOR SO [WAS] THE KING'S MANNER TOWARD ALL THAT KNEW
LAW AND JUDGMENT …)” [Esther 1:13 (KJV)]

Thus the statement: “O ye House of Israel, have ye offered me slain
beasts and sacrifices the space of 40 years in the wilderness” [Acts 7:42]

The background geometric image is the "Flower of Life" from ABYDOS which
is 971 km away from Jerusalem.

The "Star of David" geometric image was known to Pythagoras during
Babylonian captivity some 871 km away from Jerusalem.

Is irrefutable proof that “Jerusalem and the temple” is Jewish as #509 - YAHAD.



<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Kabbalistic_Circle.jpg>

"... FIGURES WHICH YOU MADE TO WORSHIP THEM: AND I SHALL CARRY YOU
BEYOND BABYLON / DAMASCUS (#509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLLS COMMUNITY)."
[Acts 7:43, Amos 5:27]

FOR IF GOD SPARED NOT THE NATURAL BRANCHES, TAKE HEED LEST HE ALSO SPARE
NOT THEE.

BEHOLD THEREFORE THE GOODNESS AND SEVERITY OF GOD: ON THEM WHICH FELL, SEVERITY; BUT TOWARD THEE, GOODNESS, IF THOU CONTINUE IN HIS GOODNESS: OTHERWISE THOU ALSO SHALT BE CUT OFF.” [Romans 11:18-22 (KJV)]

Cortese (2016, p 27) states that the word ‘technic’ is used in the sense
of encompassing both technology and technique. It derives from the
ancient Greek notion of ‘techne’, which was a category that made no distinction between technology and technique, or technology and methodology.

Given that we on 8 OCTOBER 2017 first publicly divulged our discovery of
YANG HSIUNG's (4 BCE) POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES being
the basis for an ONTIC epistemological premise, our goal then is to
briefly convey what is our work in progress into deploying the
methodology as the technological basis to Queen Victoria's Letters
Patent which whilst provisioning a historical continuity of mind, is nevertheless an artefact from the industrial revolution era.

#1 #2 #3 = #6 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION / *POWERS* (#6 - FORM OF NATURE
(#3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE)) / EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE &
DEFINITE MEANING)

#8 #9 #4 = #21 - PRINCIPLE OF LIABILITY (#9 - AUTONOMY) / APODIDOMI:
G591 (@181 - RESERVE)

#7 #6 #5 = #18 - FORM OF NATURE {QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated
29 OCTOBER 1900} / POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE) AS SOVEREIGN'S APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT
GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)

SECTION VI - QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT: And whereas by 'The
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900,' it is amongst other
things enacted, that we may authorise the Governor General to APPOINT
any person or persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or
Deputies within any part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to
exercise, during the pleasure of the Governor General such *POWERS*, and FUNCTIONS of the said Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to
such Deputy or Deputies, subject to any LIMITATIONS and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally. To be
his Deputy or Deputies within any part of Our said Commonwealth of
Australia, and in that capacity to exercise, during his pleasure, such
of his *POWERS* and FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it necessary or expedient
to assign to him or them: Provided always, that the APPOINTMENT of such
a Deputy or Deputies shall not affect the exercise by the Governor
General himself of any *POWER* or FUNCTION.

CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
1: {idea: [265 - *THE* *KEY*, 266], page: [15, 15]},
2: {idea: [267, 268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, 269 - *CONCEPT*
*OF* *CONTRADICTION* {#1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} + #49
{7x7: #175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150}, 272, 273, 274 -
*MISTRUST* *OF* *DOGMATISM*], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21]},
3: {idea: [270 - *AUSTRALIA* *DAY*], page: [22]},
6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 -
NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE})
9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
18: {IDEA: [298], PAGE: [50]}, // <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S APO: G575 (@150
- ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 -
PRESENTS)
27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
}

TETRAD TRINOMIAL DEFINITION OF NUMBER:

+ 0, 27, 54
+ 0, 9, 18
+ 0, 3, 6
+ 1, 2, 3

#298 as [#40, #8, #100, #100, #10, #600] = châqaq (H2710): {UMBRA: #11
as #208 - *WATCH* *FOR* *ARTIFICE*, *DECEIT*, *TRICK* % #41 = #3} 1) to
cut out, decree, inscribe, set, engrave, portray, govern; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to cut in; 1a2) to cut in or on, cut upon, engrave, inscribe; 1a3)
to trace, mark out; 1a4) *TO* *ENGRAVE*, *INSCRIBE* (*OF* *A* *LAW*);
1b) (Poel); 1b1) *TO* *INSCRIBE*, *ENACT*, *DECREE*; 1b2) *ONE* *WHO* *DECREES*, *LAWGIVER* (*PARTICIPLE*); 1c) (Pual) something decreed, the
law (participle); 1d) (Hophal) to be inscribed;

The Greek notion of techné reifies (Cortese: 2016, p 13) the
co-constitutive relationship humans have with their technology because
it demonstrates that a clean and clear ontological distinction between technology and technique, tool and thought, or device and mind is
neither necessary nor more appropriate than avoiding such a distinction.

And in this regard of GNOSIS EX MACHINA as the avoidance of ontological distinctions between the nature and capacity of mind and tool or device
as machine (Greek: μηχᾰνή (mēkhanḗ)) we'll convey something of our CONCEPT FOR IDEA TRANSMUTATION (AUGMENTATION / AMELIORATION) FOR ANY #81
- UNIVERSE OF DISCOURSE BEING #54 - UNITY OF APPERCEPTION as the
metalogic SCENARIO which demonstrates our case study as "fire evacuee"

"something terrible happened" change dynamic to the static

autonomous delimiter being a real world example diligently obtained from
an Internet based testimony during the Gippsland East bush fires last of DECEMBER 2019.

WHEREIN WE CONSIDERED THAT WE MIGHT VIEW A *CATASTROPHIC* *EVENT* AS
KNOWN SCENARIO IN TERMS OF A *DISJUNCTIVE* PROPOSITION:

YANG SUPERNAL (NURTURE)
A BUSH FIRE EVENT

(?)
|

(?) <-- PROBLEM RESOLUTION --> (?)

|
(?)

YIN EGO (NATURE)
OUR REALITY

In this simple neural linguistic case study we were able to redact the
various ONTIC and metalogic components and model the entire narrative
idea content which was voluntarily made.

Such narrative producing the initial GRAPPLE [#41, #57, #1, #9, #10,
#27, #45, #46, #51] PROTOTYPE conveying an ONTIC premise as to impending devastation by a @140 - RED GLOW encroaching within the distance...

[TO PRESERVE,
GUARD FROM
DANGERS]

#41 #57 #1
#46 #51 #9
#45 #27 #10 = #350 - PRESERVE FROM DANGERS / #287 - INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS

MORPHOLOGICAL CONDITION ([#79, #9, #70, #32]) --> [THEN SOMETHING
TERRIBLE HAPPENED. SO WHERE CAN WE ESCAPE TO NOW?]

#9 #41 #57
#45 #46 #1
#32 #27 #10 = #313 - DEVASTATED / #268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*

[EVERYTHING WILL BE
DEVASTATED]

A transmutation of the idea then producing the GRAPPLE [#9, #41, #57,
#1, #10, #27, #32, #45, #46] PROTOTYPE conveying that #281 -
*EVERYTHING* will be reduced to ashes…

And we concluded that whilst utilitarianism has been criticised for
focusing on the consequences rather than the motive or intrinsic nature
of an action, by the consideration that actions are right if they are
useful or for the benefit of a majority. The solution to this is perhaps
given by YANG HSIUNG's approach to his less or more structure:

#VIRTUE (MIND),
#TOOLS (SCIENCE),
#POSITION (OPINION),
#TIME (SENSE)

That might then be cause for a specialist field of BAYESIAN THEORY which
we'll term UTILITARIAN PROBABILITY that deals expressly with the
essentiality of the ONTIC premise as the impetus to any "motive or
intrinsic nature of an action".

As our introductory example being our conception of a PROPOSITIONAL
DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE we considered a STATIC
LIMITED {ie. #9} TERM of #51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG) which we had nuanced
to accommodate the need for COMPLIANCE in being a concern for #27 - DUTY purveying some beneficial ACTION related to CALAMITY as #46 -
ENLARGEMENT (K'UO).

Thusly we return again to further prudent opinion from Francesco Cortese
... Human Enhancement Technology (*HET*) is according to Cortese (2016,
p 4), typically defined as any technological attempt to overcome or
obviate the biological limitations of the human body and brain or extend
the capacities and faculties of the human body and brain beyond their
normative range of capacities and faculties.

TIME X --> [NOUMENON] <-- TIME Y

<https://www.grapple369.com/?time:16.56>

#392 as [#2, #300, #40, #10, #600] = shâmayim (H8064): {UMBRA: #390 %
#41 = #21} 1) heaven, heavens, sky; 1a) visible heavens, sky; 1a1) as
abode of the stars; 1a2) as the visible universe, the sky, atmosphere,

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)