[continued from previous message]

More philosophy about order and human dignity..


How do you think we can define "order" ?

So i will technically define it by my own smart brain so that you
understand it correctly:

So to measure "order" you have to measure it relatively
to a sequence or pattern or method or a plan, so then order
is measured by setting morality that is about perfection and that must
be progressive as i have proved it in my thoughts of my philosophy
below, so then we can logically infer the following: To be order is to
be the right morality or to be the right perfection.

More political philosophy of what is that we call human dignity..


You have to know that i think i am a philosopher, so i will ask
the philosophical question of:

What is that we call human dignity ?


So you are noticing that it is a really smart question, so i think
i am smart, so follow my way of answering it:

So i will start to ask a very smart question so that you understand:

Do you have to love smartness or to love order ?

So if you are smart you will quickly find the pattern with your fluid intelligence, and you can more clearly see the pattern if i
ask another questions like:

Do we have to marry a beautiful person ?

Do all humans have to or can be rich ?


So you are now more clearly seeing the pattern, and it is that in
philosophy the most important thing is to know how to be order and
to be order ! and it is order that gives "dignity" to humans !
so now you are seeing more clearly that we have to be really
smart so that to make the others know how to be order ! this is
why you are seeing me thinking and writing my thoughts of my
political philosophy as i am writing them so that to bring order,
and you have to know that in philosophy by setting order you are setting perfection that we have to be, and as you will notice in my philosophy
below that morality is about perfection and morality has to be
progressive, read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that you understand:

More of my philosophy about human life..

I invite you to look at this very interesting video of
a swedish women that is showing what looks like
the Winter in Sweden:

My daily Life in the Winter with hardships & beauty

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEJSfbqBPEc


And notice that the above video shows that my below philosophy is
correct, since notice how the swedish women in the video above is
learning from the difficulties of Winter how to appreciate much more
even simple pleasures of life, and notice how this mechanism, that i am
talking about in my below philosophy, is bringing much more happiness to
the swedish women in the above video, so here is my philosophy, read it carefully and notice how it is smart:


More philosophy about the strenght of philosophy..


I will ask a smart philosophical question:


Is human life sad ?


I think i am a philosopher and i will answer this question:


When you are smart you will know that morality needs the right
"balance", like a balance between competition and collaboration, or like
a balance between individualism and collectivism, so human life is the
same, it needs requirements so that to be pleasure of life, for example
human life needs the alternance of the day and night that brings beauty
and that brings pleasure, so i think human life has this kind of
alternances that brings happiness and pleasures as an essence, for
example when this Coronavirus crisis will be over, we will have learned
how to appreciate more our kind of civilization or pleasures of life, so
the sadness of Coronavirus crisis will soon bring happiness and
pleasures of life when Coronavirus crisis will be over, so as you are
noticing it is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty and pleasure, so you have to read my philosophy below about from
where comes happiness and pleasures of life so that you understand that
human life is not absurd and is not sad.


More philosophy about the great movie called Cast Away..


I invite you to look at the following short video of a great movie
called Cast Away:


Academy Award®-winning filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and two-time Oscar
winner Tom Hanks reunite to explore the blessings and heartache of fate
and the survival of the human spirit. Tom Hanks gives one of the
towering screen performances of all time as Chuck Noland, a FedEx
systems engineer whose ruled-by-the-clock existence abruptly ends when a harrowing plane crash leaves him isolated on a remote island. As Chuck struggles to survive, he finds that his own personal journey has only
just begun...


Look here at the following short video of this great movie called Cast Away:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZ3UYd1UxA


I think you have to look or look again at this great movie, because when
you are smart you will notice that the movie also learns you the way of
my philosophy below, i mean that
Chuck Noland in the video(that is Tom Hanks) is getting like more and
more hungry for our kind of civilization by being isolated on a remote
island and he is learning to understand the
way of my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and
pleasures of life, because by being isolated on a remote island he is
also learning to appreciate our kind civilization and this is also from
where comes happiness, so you have to be smart by reading my following thoughts of my philosophy about from where comes happiness and pleasures
of life and by at the same time making the logical analogy with the
great movie above that we call Cast Away:


I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms and algorithms, and i think i am a philosopher, so i
will ask a philosophical question:


From where comes happiness and pleasures of life?


It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this
alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so
i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that
for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan
Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this
great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning
of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give
yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure
like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure,
so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and
giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes
happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence,
read all my following philosophy to understand more:


More of my philosophy about pleasures of life..


As you have noticed i have talked before about the meaning and purpose
of life (read below my thoughts)..


And here is more explanation of what i was saying about pleasures of life:


101 Simple Pleasures to Boost Happiness


According to Gretchen Rubin, author of The Happiness Project and Happier
at Home. "It's not life changes like a new house or a fancy car that
make the most impact, but sometimes little things like the smell of an
orange, that give the biggest happiness boost," says Rubin.


Read more here:


https://www.huffpost.com/entry/simple-pleasures_b_3038326


More philosophy about do we have to measure it relatively or absolutely..


When you measure an IQ , you can measure it relatively to the
distribution of other IQs, but is it the right measure? so this question
is really important, since the philosopher Albert Camus was measuring
the meaning and purpose of life by measuring it like absolutely by
saying that human existence is absurd by saying:


"Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order,
meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that."


But i think this is a mistake, since in my philosophy i am measuring the meaning of human existence "relatively" to pleasures of life that are
like "powerful" drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give
meaning to human existence(since they are like powerful drugs) and they
permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going
forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of
morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), so i think i am right by saying so, so then human
existence is not absurd.


More philosophy about the hypothetical and the reality..

Do we have to measure it absolutely or relatively ?

This is an important question in philosophy:

So how do we have to measure happiness ? and is happiness real ?

So i think that the philosopher Albert Camus was not smart when he said
that human existence is absurd, by saying the following:

"Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order,
meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that."

So what is the right way to measure it ?

I think it is like science, since we are not yet perfect, so i think it
is "hypothetical" to say that human existence is absurd like was saying
the philosopher Albert Camus, because we have to to be pragmatic in
science and measure it taking into account our "imperfections" and "limitations", so the are we happy must be measured in a pragmatic way,
so then you can notice that my philosophy is more pragmatic, since it is explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it
also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and
taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a
delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that
make us more hungry for(and i think this gives much more intensity to
pleasures of life) or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of
life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of
life, so then human existence is not absurd, since the meaning of life
is that we are getting happiness from this kind of mechanism that looks
like the alternance of the day and night from where comes beauty and a
kind of pleasure, so then we have to be careful by being selective of
the kind of pleasures of life that make us happy so that for example to
not be too much materialism that causes problems.

More political philosophy about the what to expect from Biden-Harris
government and ideology..

I have just looked at Biden-Harris ideology and i think that
Biden-Harris government and ideology are smart and democratic(
read my below thoughts about Democracy to understand) and progressive,
you can notice it by for example reading the following article:

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2020/08/13/what-to-expect-from-biden-harris-on-tech-policy-platform-regulation-and-china/

So as you are noticing that Biden-Harris are smart people because
i think that to be successful in the future you have to spend much more
on digital infrastructure, and this what Biden-Harris will do, so as you
notice that the above article says the following

2- HIGHER SPENDING ON DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND ADOPTION PROGRAMS

Inadequate and inequitable access to high-speed broadband prevents
ordinary citizens from benefitting from the new economy. Our research
has noted that basic digital infrastructure increasingly is required to
access telemedicine, engage in online learning, apply for jobs, or get
loans and mortgages. A Biden-Harris ticket could make closing the
digital divide a national priority, especially for vulnerable urban and
rural populations where obstacles in network deployment, affordability,
and adoption still exist.


So as you are noticing that Biden-Harris are smart people because
they want USA to be efficiently prepared to take advantage of
the exponential progress of capitalism and to be much more apt and
efficient in learning and education so that also Democracy works
correctly(so we have to be much more optimistic about USA), read the
following very interesting article to understand more:

Capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth

Also Biden-Harris government and ideology want more competition and
less confrontation with China..

Also Biden-Harris government and ideology want a greater tech
regulation, so i think it is smart since i have also just spoken about Antitrust laws etc. so i invite you to read my following thoughts to
notice it:

More political philosophy about wich ideology to follow..

In political philosophy we can ask a question of:

Wich kind of ideology to follow ?

But i think that a smart answer to this question is also to answer the
question of:

Wich ideology to not follow ?


This is why you are also noticing that also my way of doing
is that i am also answering the question of: Wich ideology to not
follow, read my following thoughts to notice it:

More political philosophy about my new smart proverb..

As you have just noticed i have just written a new proverb, and
here it is:

"R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring
or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you
have to know how to manage it and how to manage the
risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage
efficiently by not hurting good competition"

Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means:

"A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably"

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility


This new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic
volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and
efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws:

"Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect
consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition. Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business
activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and monopolies."

This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that
brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good
competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts:

More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of
China?..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Here is the big economic problems of China:

First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the
following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw

Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the
FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8

Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of
nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition
that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully:


Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China...

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today
i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN?
and more..

We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the
mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has
compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and
Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for "competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it.

Look in this video carefully to notice it:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw


I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think
China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition"
that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it:

Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies

Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive
grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G
operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of
Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal (article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75
billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company.
State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity
of world competition ...

The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not
this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. "

Read more here:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php


And to know more about nationalism and economic nationalism, read my
following thoughts:

My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
far-right and nationalism.


So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
those above ideologies?

I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following:

Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial
intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is
what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization)
there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and
there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read
about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge
to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation
and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge
to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration
and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy
like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism
that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like
seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that
guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local
optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much
competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by
logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in
PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following:

Read the following article about economic nationalism:

Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications


https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/


Notice that it says the following:


"Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is
counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly
interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries
for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are
more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and
otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad
policy."

So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do.

This is why i also said the following:

More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q


As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my
following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with
others, here they are:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it
is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.

More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will
easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding
artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but
you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to
guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning
you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is
good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data,
also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level
abstraction in artificial intelligence..

Read about it here:

https://mattturck.com/frontierai/


And read about PathNet here:

https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46


More about artificial intelligence..

I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is
reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on
right now, see the following video to understand more about it:

Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s

I think that since i have just understood much more artificial
intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project
that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a
powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial
intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain
much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness..

And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial
intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it:

Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization

But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee
the optimal convergence.

So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO:

Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient
parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal
convergence, here is how to do it with PSO:

v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))]

x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1)

constriction coefficient parameter is:

k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi)))

k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729

phi = c1 + c2

To guarantee the optimal convergence use:

c1 = c2 = 2.05

phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729

w=0.7298

Population size = 60;


Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are
much less powerful since they perform only exploitation.

In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching
capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms
( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both
Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only.

In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the
chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not
have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration).

Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the
lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different
places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in
many valleys simultaneously.

And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO.



More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

And now i will start by asking a philosophical question:


Is Democracy morality ?


I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact
perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as:
"the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection


And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of
morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people
have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why
it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive",
read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to
know that they have to be progressive:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4


And we can say the following:


The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.


But i ask a smart question of:


Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?


Here is my answer:


But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read
my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..


Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?


When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since
also we can logically prove it by saying the following:


From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?


So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.


But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:


Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:


From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)