Hello..


More about my professionalism and more about me..

I have come to Canada when i was 20 years old, and i am living
in Canada Quebec for 32 years and now i am 52 years old , but i am
genetically an athletic guy and i feel that i am still young because
i am more athletic and i am 6 Feet tall, and i am beautiful
from the inside since i am a gentleman type of person and it is also
genetical in me, and i have worked as a software consultant with
some hospitals in USA, and i have worked with some computer hardware
companies and software companies in British Colombia and in New
Brunswick in Canada, and here is more about my education and my Diploma
and more:

My name is Amine Moulay Ramdane, i am a white arab from Morocco, and
i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms
and algorithms, and i am a gentleman type of person, and i live in
Quebec Canada since year 1989, i am also a Canadian from Morocco, and
you have seen me writing my thoughts of my political philosophy here,
and now i will talk about my education and my Diploma: my Diploma is a university level Diploma, my school in Morocco where i have studied and
gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics
was under the control of Paris Academie in France (we call it Académie
de Paris), and here it is:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Ffr.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAcad%25C3%25A9mie_de_Paris

And i have continued to study one more year of applied mathematics in university of Montreal in Quebec Canada, and i have succeeded this one
year in applied mathematics in university of Montreal, so with my
Diploma and this one year of applied mathematics i have studied and
succeeded 3 years at the university level, after that i have studied
Network administration and i have also worked as a network administrator
and as software developer consultant, the name of my company was and is Cyber-NT Communications in Quebec Canada, and around years 2001 and
2002 i have started to implement some of my softwares like PerlZip that
looked like PkZip of PKware software company, but i have implemented it
for Perl , and i have implemented the Dynamic Link Libraries of my
PerlZip that permits to compress and decompress etc. with the
"Delphi"compiler, so my PerlZip software product was very fast
and very efficient, in year 2002 i have posted the Beta version on
internet, and as a proof , please read about it here:

http://computer-programming-forum.com/52-perl-modules/ea157f4a229fc720.htm

And after that i have sold the release version of my PerlZip
product to many many companies and to many individuals around the world,
and i have even sold it to many Banks in Europe, and with that i have
made more money.

And after that i have continued to work like a software developer
consultant and network administrator, the name of my company was and is Cyber-NT Communications,

Here is my company in Quebec(Canada) called Cyber-NT Communications,
i have worked as a software developer and as a network administrator,
read the proof here:

https://opencorporates.com/companies/ca_qc/2246777231

Also read the following part of a somewhat old book of O'Reilly called
Perl for System Administration by David N. Blank-Edelman, and you will
notice that it contains my name and it speaks about some of my Perl modules:

https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/perl-for-system/1565926099/ch04s04.html

And you can find my Open source software projects here in my website:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/

Canada's spirit of tolerance..


As i said above i have lived in Canada for 32 years and i have come to
Canada when i was young, so i have a Canadian spirit like the following,
read it carefully to notice:

Canada's Spirit Of Tolerance Is Why I Chose To Call It Home

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/surjit-singh-flora/canada-is-my-home-now_b_17077942.html


And here is my following thoughts and read them carefully:


I invite you to read the following article:

Are Robots Coming for Our Jobs? Careful, It’s a Trick Question

https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/22/will-robots-take-our-jobs-careful-its-a-trick-question/

And notice that it says the following:

"...Economic disparities have become more pronounced, with those at the
top of corporate ladders raking in the money while much of the workforce
sees no difference in earnings. These disparities (along with the
technologies themselves) have fed into political polarization and helped
fuel a rise in identity politics, nationalism, and the election of
strongmen."


But i think my following philosophy gives a solution to the above
problem, so i invite you to read all my following thoughts of my
philosophy to notice it:

More of my philosophy about egoism and competition and collaboration and cooperation..

I invite you to look at the following video:

Why is Communism So Appealing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_0UAsaqaOc

I am not a communist, my political philosophy is different,
and i think my philosophy is better, and i am explaining it in
my below thoughts, i think that the philosophy of the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith was lacking on efficiency, since he said that
"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"
and i think it is not true, simply because creativity and innovation
come not only from competition and its egoism, but they also come from
ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries(so they
need globalization), but egoism of competition is too much extremism
that hurts because it has also the tendency to make ideas not
circulating and combining efficiently across nations and industries, so
my philosophy says that we have to seek like a balance between
competition and collaboration or cooperation, and this needs also
collaboration and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my
new philosophy and model, read it carefully in my following thoughts:

More philosophy about the Scottish and economist and philosopher called
Adam Smith..

I invite you to look at the following video about Adam Smith:

ADAM SMITH - La main invisible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvtWvDkkVk

You can read about Adam Smith here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith


I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i say that
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith was not right by saying the following(you
can listen to it in the above video):

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

I think that Adam Smith is not right by saying so, since my new
philosophy and model says that you have to seek like a balance between collaboration or cooperation and competition(and egoism comes
from competition), my philosophy says that innovation and creativity
not only come from competition but it also come from ideas circulating
and combining across nations and industries(so they need globalization),
so in my philosophy creativity and innovation needs also collaboration
and cooperation by sharing ideas and sharing knowledge and sharing PhD
papers and sharing open source softwares etc. and here is my new
philosophy and model:

My today talk is about white supremacism and neo-nazism and the
far-right and nationalism.

So the first philosophical question is how to talk about
those above ideologies?

I think that it is also like a Mensa IQ test, so since i think i am
smart, i have to use my smartness to solve the Mensa IQ test, so when
you are smart, so how can you solve the problem(that is like a Mensa IQ
test) of those above ideologies ? i think that i have first to detect
the important pattern with my fluid intelligence, and i have to see
clearly the pattern(like for example getting into the details from the abstraction of the pattern), and the important pattern is the following:

Notice that it is like an optimization problem of artificial
intelligence that looks like PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), it is
what we call Swarm intelligence, and in PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization)
there is what we call local optimization that we call exploitation, and
there is what we call global optimization that we call exploration(read
about PSO in my thoughts below so that to understand), so if PSO is not balanced correctly with exploitation and exploration it can not converge
to the global optimum, we say that PSO has to guarantee the optimal convergence, so if it is not correctly balanced with both exploitation
and exploration it can get stuck in a local maximum and not to converge
to global optimum, so then notice that with logical analogy, exploration
and exploitation of PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization) is in philosophy
like seeking the right balance between individualism and collectivism
that guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, or it is like
seeking the right balance between collaboration and competition that
guarantees the optimal convergence like in PSO, so then since the above ideologies are nationalism and nationalism is too much local
optimization and lack of global optimization , it is too much
competition and lack of collaboration or cooperation, so it is by
logical analogy like too much exploitation and lack of exploration in
PSO, so this is not good and here is how to notice it , read the following:

Read the following article about economic nationalism:

Rise of Economic Nationalism and Its Implications


https://www.lewisu.edu/experts/wordpress/index.php/rise-of-economic-nationalism-and-its-implications/


Notice that it says the following:


"Countries benefit with cooperation between countries to mutual benefit, becoming too nationalistic at the expense of its partners is
counterproductive. It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero sum game in an increasingly
interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries
for their economic and political and national security well being. When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive. When they are
more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and
otherwise contribute to economic growth. Economic nationalism is a bad
policy."

So a you are noticing that nationalism is not the right way to do.

This is why i also said the following:

More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q


As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my
following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with
others, here they are:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it
is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.

More philosophy about what is artificial intelligence and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and when you are smart you will
easily understand artificial intelligence, this is why i am finding
artificial intelligence easy to learn, i think to be able to understand artificial intelligence you have to understand reasoning with energy minimization, like with PSO(Particle Swarm Optimization), but
you have to be smart since the Population based algorithm has to
guarantee the optimal convergence, and this is why i am learning
you how to do it(read below), i think that GA(genetic algorithm) is
good for teaching it, but GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and after learning how to do reasoning with energy minimization in artificial intelligence, you have to understand what is transfer learning in artificial intelligence with PathNet or such, this transfer learning permits to train faster and require less labeled data,
also PathNET is much more powerful since also it is higher level
abstraction in artificial intelligence..

Read about it here:

https://mattturck.com/frontierai/


And read about PathNet here:

https://medium.com/@thoszymkowiak/deepmind-just-published-a-mind-blowing-paper-pathnet-f72b1ed38d46


More about artificial intelligence..

I think one of the most important part in artificial intelligence is
reasoning with energy minimization, it is the one that i am working on
right now, see the following video to understand more about it:

Yann LeCun: Can Neural Networks Reason?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfwNEY826I&t=250s

I think that since i have just understood much more artificial
intelligence, i will soon show you my next Open source software project
that implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a
powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial
intelligence using PSO, and i will write an article that explain
much more artificial intelligence and what is smartness and what is consciousness and self-awareness..

And in only one day i have just learned "much" more artificial
intelligence, i have read the following article about Particle Swarm Optimization and i have understood it:

Artificial Intelligence - Particle Swarm Optimization

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2011/august/artificial-intelligence-particle-swarm-optimization

But i have just noticed that the above implementation doesn't guarantee
the optimal convergence.

So here is how to guarantee the optimal convergence in PSO:

Clerc and Kennedy in (Trelea 2003) propose a constriction coefficient
parameter selection guidelines in order to guarantee the optimal
convergence, here is how to do it with PSO:

v(t+1) = k*[(v(t) + (c1 * r1 * (p(t) – x(t)) + (c2 * r2 * (g(t) – x(t))]

x(t+1) = x(t) + v(t+1)

constriction coefficient parameter is:

k = 2/abs(2-phi-sqrt(phi^2-(4*phi)))

k:=2/abs((2-4.1)-(0.640)) = 0.729

phi = c1 + c2

To guarantee the optimal convergence use:

c1 = c2 = 2.05

phi = 4.1 => k equal to 0.729

w=0.7298

Population size = 60;


Also i have noticed that GA(genetic algorithm) doesn't guarantee the
optimal convergence, and SA(Simulated annealing) and Hill Climbing are
much less powerful since they perform only exploitation.

In general, any metaheuristic should perform two main searching
capabilities (Exploration and Exploitation). Population based algorithms
( or many solutions ) such as GA, PSO, ACO, or ABC, performs both
Exploration and Exploitation, while Single-Based Algorithm such as SA(Simulated annealing), Hill Climbing, performs the exploitation only.

In this case, more exploitation and less exploration increases the
chances for trapping in local optima. Because the algorithm does not
have the ability to search in another position far from the current best solution ( which is Exploration).

Simulated annealing starts in one valley and typically ends in the
lowest point of the same valley. Whereas swarms start in many different
places of the mountain range and are searching for the lowest point in
many valleys simultaneously.

And in my next Open source software project i will implement a powerful Parallel Linear programming solver and a powerful Parallel Mixed-integer programming solver with Artificial intelligence using PSO.


More philosophy about what is the purpose of education..


I invite you to read the following interesting article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2015/02/12/whats-the-purpose-of-education-in-the-21st-century/

So can we ask a philosophical question of:

Should young people become educated to get prepared to enter the
workforce, or should the purpose of education be focused more on social, academic, cultural and intellectual development so that students can
grow up to be engaged citizens?

I think that we have to be optimistic because i just said in my
philosophy(read it below) that our era of globalization has been
characterized by the democratization of technology, democratization of
finance, and democratization of information, so as you are noticing that
we are "continually" educating ourselves in internet to become much
better citizens. So being connected to internet with a computer is
so important, so Africa too has to be connected to internet.

More philosophy about internet and phone and addiction and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

The Ugly Truth about Modern Life!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFR0Mk9KDZ4

I think that the above video is making a mistake, since there is,
technically, no such thing as internet or phone "addiction",
here is the proof, read the following important article:

Is Internet Addiction Real?

https://childmind.org/article/is-internet-addiction-real/

And the above video is like wanting us to stop the engine of capitalism,
but i don't agree, because read my below philosophy:

More philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche..

I think that i am a philosopher that is smart and i am understanding
the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsch, and i think
that it is an inferior philosophy, because it seeks to construct
the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in the philosophy of
Friedrich Nietzsch is a superhuman that has mastery over his emotions
and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so as you are
noticing that it is an inferior philosophy, because how can you be able
to take joy in simply existing ? so as you are noticing it is illogical
and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my below thoughts about
Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent philosophy as Stoicism, this
is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch is a failure as Stoicism,
so i think my new philosophy is much better and i invite you to read
it carefully in my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about consumerism..

I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, so i invite
you to look at the following video, it is about capitalism and consumerism:

The Consoomer: Consumerism is Nihilism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zZJ1BFQ1hw

I think the person that is talking in the above video is low IQ, i have
a high IQ and i answer the following:

Capitalism is a "tool" and you have to know how to use this tool and
capitalism is an "engine" that permits to create pleasures of life that
we enjoy (as services or products) so that to be happy(and this being
happy is the meaning of human life in my philosophy below), but notice
that this permits also the not rich to be happy because Mass production
in capitalism resulted in lower prices of consumer goods. Eventually,
economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product
for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits,
and also look at how we are taking advantage of youtube videos or the
like in internet with a low price, and this low prices in capitalism
allows the not rich to be happy, and this at the same time avoids totalitarianism such as communism and neo-nazism and nazism(because they
are "Fascism" of socialism that is against capitalism), read my below philosophy to understand more, and notice that dictatorship of communism
of China is not communism, because it is using capitalism as an engine
that permits the people to be happy, so communism of China is not like communism, read my below philosophy to understand:

More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and Existentialism..

I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:

Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020

And notice that it says the following:

“The Stoics suggest that what’s most important in order to lead a good
life is internal rather than external. It’s about developing the right character, the right state of mind,”

I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the
logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that
developing the right character and the right state of the mind in
Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external
reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we
can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions
and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough
hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and
fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a
failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in
french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that
this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the
question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural
side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is
"not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a
purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and
like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life
is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not
absurd and here is my new philosophy , read it again carefully:

So as you have just noticed that my philosophy is a new philosophy that
doesn't look like the others, and the architectural ideas of my
philosophy are the following:

There is an absolute and a relative way of measuring, so when we measure absolutely(i mean completely or totally) the meaning of human life, so
like in the case of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, we can
say: "Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order,
meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that", hence when we are measuring
absolutely the meaning of life, we can say that human life is absurd,
but the question in philosophy is: Is human life absurd? In my
philosophy human life is not absurd, because i say that happiness comes
from enjoying pleasures of life that we feel with our senses we humans,
and i am also defining the human sense as the one that comes from the
brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness, so when you are happiness by enjoying pleasures
of life with your human senses, you are enjoying life and you are
not thinking about the "absolute" meaning of human life, but the meaning
of human life becomes "relative", and since it becomes this relativeness
so human life becomes not absurd, since this enjoying pleasures of life
with our human senses is "like" a powerful "drug" that permit to be
happy and to not to be preoccupied with the absolute meaning of human
life that is talking about the philosopher Albert Camus.

More about my philosophy and about human existence..

I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and now i will explain
more my philosophy so that you understand it:

Our era of globalization has been characterized by the democratization
of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of
information, and from where do you think comes this progress ?
i think it comes from the "exponential" progress of our humanity, and
you have to understand this exponential progress of our humanity
correctly by reading my below thoughts, other than that i think that
those democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information have like democratized
happiness too, i mean that before those democratizations brought
by the exponential progress of our humanity, Lower social class
and lower middle class had to be rich to be able to be happy,
because we were lacking technology and lacking tools that permit
to be happy without being rich, so this is why humanity was much more
violent because the not rich was violently fighting the rich etc. so we
had violent ideologies like communism and nazism etc. but i think that
today with the big advancement of technology and science etc. we are
able to be happy without being rich, and read my below thoughts to
understand how and to understand my philosophy about it, and read my
following thoughts about democratization of technology, democratization
of finance, and democratization of information so that you understand more:


And look at the following video:

Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo

I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video
is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that
you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the
above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that
to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents,
but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can
attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so
then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that
you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or
parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient
way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization,
and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development),
also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that
Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since
you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you
also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance:

More about "democratization" of finance..

This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development
(R&D))..

And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to
understand:

The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it’s ever been

Read more here:

https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/


About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research
and Development (R&D) investment

This is also why i said the following:

Look at the following interesting video:

Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI


But i think that this minister of education, science and technology
of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly
into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology
that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than
using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think
that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization
has been characterized by the democratization of technology,
democratization of finance, and democratization of information.

Here is more proof of what i am saying:


2. Question: What do you mean by “Democratizing Innovation”?

Eric von Hippel:

The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap
and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a
steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These
sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively
little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they
can use them to design new products and services.

Read more here:

Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users

https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html


More precision about more of my philosophy about indian meditation and
about my philosophy..


I invite you to look at the following video about indian meditation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHelfPFLXbs


I don't agree with indian meditation that wants us to stop seeking
pleasure of the senses, i think that indian meditation wants like
to solve the problem of materialism that causes problems such as
violence between the rich and not rich etc. but i think that my
philosophy is much better than indian meditation, so i invite
you to read it again carefully, and notice that the following
webpage is defining the human senses as the following:

The Five (and More) Senses

https://www.livescience.com/60752-human-senses.html


But i think that i am also defining the human sense as the one that
comes from the brain and from consciousness that gives pleasure, i mean
that when you are "learning" by looking at a video on youtube it can
give a pleasure inside your brain that comes from the brain and from consciousness.

So read my following philosophy that i think is much better than indian meditation:

Yet more philosophy about my philosophy..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think that i am a philosopher that is smart, and i will ask

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)