• Larger destabilisation plot in JNU spectacle

    From Dr. Jai Maharaj@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 15 17:40:15 2016
    XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.india

    LARGER DESTABILISATION PLOT IN JNU SPECTACLE

    By Balbir Punj
    Editorial
    The Pioneer
    http://www.dailypioneer.com
    Monday, February 15, 2016

    All this hullabaloo at the Jawaharlal Nehru University
    was an agenda of the communists to align with Islamic
    extremism, gain wider support from the public in view of
    the upcoming elections in West Bengal and Kerala

    Even as Siachen braveheart Lance Naik Hanamanthappa
    Koppad was battling for life at an Army hospital in New
    Delhi, a bunch of students from the Jawaharlal Nehru
    University, were busy chanting anti-national slogans such
    as Kashmir ki azadi tak jung chalegi, Bharat ki barbadi
    tak jung chalegi. Nothing could have been more ironical
    than this.

    The incident at JNU is not in isolation. In Chandigarh,
    activists of the Aam Aadmi Party were busy celebrating
    the birth anniversary of militant leader Jarnail Singh
    Bhindranwale. Bhindranwale was a Khalistani ideologue who
    was responsible for the execution of hundreds of
    patriotic Hindus and Sikhs. He had met his end in
    Operation Bluestar that was ordered by former Prime
    Minister Indira Gandhi.

    Irrespective of the label that the activists carry, such
    programmes are the handiwork of the Left or the political
    adventurists who have no ideological baggage.

    Read this along with the campaign at JNU, against the
    hanging of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru and
    Maqbool Bhat, as martyrs or innocents. At the Hyderabad
    University, it was Rohith Vemula and his group who
    organised campaigns against the hanging of Yakub Memon
    who was convicted in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts.

    All these executions were carried out after the accused
    were given all opportunities to prove their 'innocence'
    if any while the Ishrat Jahan encounter was to prevent
    her and her associates from carrying out the task on
    behalf of their Pakistani handlers.

    In the Ishrat Jahan case, the then Congress-led UPA
    Government used her killing as a conspiracy of the
    Gujarat police, to earn for its officers, Government
    recognition and to show leading figures in the State
    Government that was headed by the then Chief Minister
    Narendra Modi, as promoting extra judicial killings
    targeting the Muslim community.

    Anti-Modi organisations then castigated Mr Modi and
    prominent police officers in the State as carrying out
    the killing of innocents in line with the 'communal'
    event of Gujarat in 2002.

    However, David Headley's statement that Ishrat Jahan was
    a Lashkar-e-Tayyeba operative has come as a blow to the
    Congress and has exposed the activities of the so-called
    jihadi elements who receive support from the Pakistani
    establishment, whose main aim is to destroy the Indian
    state.

    However, those who knowingly or unknowingly sided with
    these jihadi elements and who sought to pillory true
    nationalists, stand exposed for what they really are.

    The Left, with its anti-India mindset, wants to connect
    the anti-Muslim and anti-Dalit strands, to support each
    other and to make the world believe that the two are a
    part of the Indian State's 'anti-people' mindset.
    Thereby, the Left is being used as a tool by Pakistan in
    its campaign to bleed India white through inflicting a
    thousand cuts.

    Being a willing tool for Pakistan is nothing new. The
    Left has a history of opposing anything that is in the
    nation's interest, especially those of communist Russia
    (so long as Russia was the leader of the international
    communist movement) and then to China, when it challenged
    Russia through the Maoist theory of destroying capitalism
    through subterfuge and violence.

    In the pre-war 1930s, the Left was generally opposed the
    national movement for independence, claiming that true
    independence should be when power is snatched from
    capitalism. The Left was opposed to the World War II as a
    capitalist conspiracy. However, the moment Russia joined
    Britain and the US in resisting Hitler, the Left changed
    its course to support the War. So, when Indian
    nationalists gave the people the slogan of 'Quit India',
    the communists and fellow travelers overnight turned out
    to be supporters of the war and Britain.

    The Communist support to British against Indian
    nationalism also resulted in communist party lauding
    Mohammad Ali Jinnah's demand for partition of the
    country. It refused to recognise the emergence of India
    as an independent country in 1947 and actively launched
    an underground violence against the new Indian state.

    In 1962, the anti-national trend in communist activities
    were again visible. The moment Red China attacked the
    India militarily, it refused to identify itself with the
    rest of the nation that had declared China as an enemy.
    This period also signified the Great Divide within the
    international communist movement. In India too, the
    communist movement split into two with the majority
    faction going with China and holding up the Maoist
    communism as the most suited to India.

    The 1940s and the 1950s saw communists in particular and
    the Left in general, opposing Indian nationalism as
    nothing more than capitalist conspiracy against people's
    democracy and violence was its main thrust. Afterwards
    too, when the communist movement or at least a section of
    it sought to capture power through parliamentary means,
    there was a strong Chinese communist thread running
    through the Marxist party with official delegations
    making its presence felt in Beijing even as Red China was
    criticising the Indian Government and its national
    policies and the Indian communists joined the chorus. The
    more violent section of the Marxists totally joining
    forces with China became the China's cats paw in India.

    The political tie of the communists with Islamic
    communalism and Islamist movements is no recent
    phenomenon either. The communists supported Islamist
    exclusivism all through till now. Politically the
    Communist Party of India (Marxist) was a great supporter
    of Islamic extremism, both in West Bengal and in Kerala,
    the two States that had maximum traction among other
    States. But we know that Islamism and its extremist
    politics have worked with Naxalites and communists
    together.

    Since 2009, the Left has seen its political support from
    the middle class steadily declining. This led to a loss
    of power for the Marxist party in both West Bengal and
    Kerala and also a decline in its membership. The
    communists now want to align with Islamic extremism, to
    gain critical wider support from the public to gain power
    in both the States. So, this stronger support to
    Islamist movements and strategies here.

    The Leftist activists at JNU were not only seeking to
    make a martyr out of Afzal Guru, but were ready to
    support Pakistan's stand on Kashmir. This is what the JNU
    Left group said in its recent meeting. A report in the
    Hindustan Times on the meeting said, "The student faction
    organised a 'cultural evening to protest the judicial
    killing of Afzal Guru and Muqbool Bhatt' and to show
    solidarity with the Kashmiri people for their democratic
    right to self-determination".

    Certainly, even Pakistan would not have gone that far.
    The Left-inspired protests are no innocent idealism. It
    is an outward symptom of deeper connectivity of Indian
    communists with Islamist extremism.

    http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/edit/larger-destabilisation-plot-in-jnu-spectacle.html

    More at:

    The Pioneer
    http://www.dailypioneer.com

    Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
    Om Shanti

    http://bit.do/jaimaharaj

    o o o

    o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used
    for the educational purposes of research and open
    discussion. The contents of this post may not have been
    authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion
    of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright
    law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

    o Posted for information and discussion. Views
    expressed by others are not necessarily those of the
    poster who may or may not have read the article.
    FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted
    material the use of which may or may not have been
    specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This
    material is being made available in efforts to advance
    the understanding of environmental, political, human
    rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and
    cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this
    constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
    as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
    In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the
    material on this site is distributed without profit to
    those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
    the included information for research, comment,
    discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to
    USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
    information go to:
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

    If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article
    for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
    must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

    Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one
    or more net terrorists, this post may be reposted several
    times.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)