XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.politics
XPost: talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.india
LARGER DESTABILISATION PLOT IN JNU SPECTACLE
By Balbir Punj
Editorial
The Pioneer
http://www.dailypioneer.com
Monday, February 15, 2016
All this hullabaloo at the Jawaharlal Nehru University
was an agenda of the communists to align with Islamic
extremism, gain wider support from the public in view of
the upcoming elections in West Bengal and Kerala
Even as Siachen braveheart Lance Naik Hanamanthappa
Koppad was battling for life at an Army hospital in New
Delhi, a bunch of students from the Jawaharlal Nehru
University, were busy chanting anti-national slogans such
as Kashmir ki azadi tak jung chalegi, Bharat ki barbadi
tak jung chalegi. Nothing could have been more ironical
than this.
The incident at JNU is not in isolation. In Chandigarh,
activists of the Aam Aadmi Party were busy celebrating
the birth anniversary of militant leader Jarnail Singh
Bhindranwale. Bhindranwale was a Khalistani ideologue who
was responsible for the execution of hundreds of
patriotic Hindus and Sikhs. He had met his end in
Operation Bluestar that was ordered by former Prime
Minister Indira Gandhi.
Irrespective of the label that the activists carry, such
programmes are the handiwork of the Left or the political
adventurists who have no ideological baggage.
Read this along with the campaign at JNU, against the
hanging of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru and
Maqbool Bhat, as martyrs or innocents. At the Hyderabad
University, it was Rohith Vemula and his group who
organised campaigns against the hanging of Yakub Memon
who was convicted in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts.
All these executions were carried out after the accused
were given all opportunities to prove their 'innocence'
if any while the Ishrat Jahan encounter was to prevent
her and her associates from carrying out the task on
behalf of their Pakistani handlers.
In the Ishrat Jahan case, the then Congress-led UPA
Government used her killing as a conspiracy of the
Gujarat police, to earn for its officers, Government
recognition and to show leading figures in the State
Government that was headed by the then Chief Minister
Narendra Modi, as promoting extra judicial killings
targeting the Muslim community.
Anti-Modi organisations then castigated Mr Modi and
prominent police officers in the State as carrying out
the killing of innocents in line with the 'communal'
event of Gujarat in 2002.
However, David Headley's statement that Ishrat Jahan was
a Lashkar-e-Tayyeba operative has come as a blow to the
Congress and has exposed the activities of the so-called
jihadi elements who receive support from the Pakistani
establishment, whose main aim is to destroy the Indian
state.
However, those who knowingly or unknowingly sided with
these jihadi elements and who sought to pillory true
nationalists, stand exposed for what they really are.
The Left, with its anti-India mindset, wants to connect
the anti-Muslim and anti-Dalit strands, to support each
other and to make the world believe that the two are a
part of the Indian State's 'anti-people' mindset.
Thereby, the Left is being used as a tool by Pakistan in
its campaign to bleed India white through inflicting a
thousand cuts.
Being a willing tool for Pakistan is nothing new. The
Left has a history of opposing anything that is in the
nation's interest, especially those of communist Russia
(so long as Russia was the leader of the international
communist movement) and then to China, when it challenged
Russia through the Maoist theory of destroying capitalism
through subterfuge and violence.
In the pre-war 1930s, the Left was generally opposed the
national movement for independence, claiming that true
independence should be when power is snatched from
capitalism. The Left was opposed to the World War II as a
capitalist conspiracy. However, the moment Russia joined
Britain and the US in resisting Hitler, the Left changed
its course to support the War. So, when Indian
nationalists gave the people the slogan of 'Quit India',
the communists and fellow travelers overnight turned out
to be supporters of the war and Britain.
The Communist support to British against Indian
nationalism also resulted in communist party lauding
Mohammad Ali Jinnah's demand for partition of the
country. It refused to recognise the emergence of India
as an independent country in 1947 and actively launched
an underground violence against the new Indian state.
In 1962, the anti-national trend in communist activities
were again visible. The moment Red China attacked the
India militarily, it refused to identify itself with the
rest of the nation that had declared China as an enemy.
This period also signified the Great Divide within the
international communist movement. In India too, the
communist movement split into two with the majority
faction going with China and holding up the Maoist
communism as the most suited to India.
The 1940s and the 1950s saw communists in particular and
the Left in general, opposing Indian nationalism as
nothing more than capitalist conspiracy against people's
democracy and violence was its main thrust. Afterwards
too, when the communist movement or at least a section of
it sought to capture power through parliamentary means,
there was a strong Chinese communist thread running
through the Marxist party with official delegations
making its presence felt in Beijing even as Red China was
criticising the Indian Government and its national
policies and the Indian communists joined the chorus. The
more violent section of the Marxists totally joining
forces with China became the China's cats paw in India.
The political tie of the communists with Islamic
communalism and Islamist movements is no recent
phenomenon either. The communists supported Islamist
exclusivism all through till now. Politically the
Communist Party of India (Marxist) was a great supporter
of Islamic extremism, both in West Bengal and in Kerala,
the two States that had maximum traction among other
States. But we know that Islamism and its extremist
politics have worked with Naxalites and communists
together.
Since 2009, the Left has seen its political support from
the middle class steadily declining. This led to a loss
of power for the Marxist party in both West Bengal and
Kerala and also a decline in its membership. The
communists now want to align with Islamic extremism, to
gain critical wider support from the public to gain power
in both the States. So, this stronger support to
Islamist movements and strategies here.
The Leftist activists at JNU were not only seeking to
make a martyr out of Afzal Guru, but were ready to
support Pakistan's stand on Kashmir. This is what the JNU
Left group said in its recent meeting. A report in the
Hindustan Times on the meeting said, "The student faction
organised a 'cultural evening to protest the judicial
killing of Afzal Guru and Muqbool Bhatt' and to show
solidarity with the Kashmiri people for their democratic
right to self-determination".
Certainly, even Pakistan would not have gone that far.
The Left-inspired protests are no innocent idealism. It
is an outward symptom of deeper connectivity of Indian
communists with Islamist extremism.
http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/edit/larger-destabilisation-plot-in-jnu-spectacle.html
More at:
The Pioneer
http://www.dailypioneer.com
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://bit.do/jaimaharaj
o o o
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used
for the educational purposes of research and open
discussion. The contents of this post may not have been
authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion
of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright
law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views
expressed by others are not necessarily those of the
poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted
material the use of which may or may not have been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This
material is being made available in efforts to advance
the understanding of environmental, political, human
rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and
cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the
material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for research, comment,
discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to
USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article
for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one
or more net terrorists, this post may be reposted several
times.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)