• Universities becoming incubators of jihad virus

    From Topaz@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 1 15:42:46 2016
    XPost: alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.indian, alt.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.misc

    By Luke O'Farrell

    "We propose that it be made an offence to download material from the
    internet that could incite racial or religious hatred." When it was
    claimed that the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) made that sinister, totalitarian proposal in September 2006, you could understand what
    George W. Bush meant when he said: "They hate us for our freedoms."
    Staunch in defense of freedom, Britain's conservative commentariat
    rushed to condemn the MCB. "Free speech is the bedrock of a free
    society!" they thundered. "Any group that seeks to undermine it has no
    place in a democracy. If Muslims don't like Britain's proud,
    centuries-old tradition of free speech, they know what they can do:
    get out!"

    Shamefully, however, many defenders of Western freedom against
    Islamist tyranny seem to have forgotten what the MCB said in 2006. If
    you're one of them, here's an extract from The Times to refresh your
    memory:

    The All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism was set up last
    year. None of the 14 members of the panel is Jewish, but evidence was
    taken from across the Jewish community. The report proposes that it be
    made an offence to download material from the internet that could
    incite racial or religious hatred. Drawing on the view of the
    Macpherson report that a racist act is defined by its victim, not by
    whether a perpetrator considers himself racist, anti-Semitism is
    defined in the report as "any remark, insult or act, the purpose or
    effect of which is to violate a Jewish person's dignity or create an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment
    for him". (Loc. cit., 7th September 2006)

    Oh dear, so it wasn't the MCB who wanted to turn us into a
    police-state after all: it was the philosemitic politicians who
    conducted the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism.
    Whoever would have guessed it? Anyone who knows about Jews and free
    speech, that's who. If Jews have power and influence, they start
    working to take away free speech. It's no use arguing that some Jews
    support free speech and some white goyim oppose it: the average effect
    of the two groups is perfectly clear. It was whites who created free
    speech in the West and it is Jews who are taking it away. Was there
    any popular support for Britain's race laws, introduced in the 1960s
    and steadily harshened ever since? No, there wasn't, but what does the
    will of the people matter in a democracy? The Board of Jewish Deputies
    wanted the race laws and got them. The Jewish Anti-Defamation League
    would like identical laws in the United States; so far, thanks to the
    evil white males who created the First Amendment, it hasn't gotten
    them. Canadians haven't been so lucky, as the neo-con Mark Steyn has discovered. He's gotten into trouble for saying things Muslims don't
    like, but let's give him his due: he's admitted that Jews aren't
    entirely blameless:

    Submission from the Board of Deputies of British Jews
    The Board of Deputies of British Jews welcomes the opportunity to make
    this submission to the Select Committee on Religious Offences. The
    Board is the representative body and voice of the British Jewish
    community. It was founded in 1760. The Jewish community is covered by
    the provisions of the Race Relations Acts. The Board is generally
    satisfied with the format of the current legislation following the
    amendments to Part 3 of the Public Order Act in the Criminal Justice
    and Public Order Act 1994, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and the
    Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. The Malicious Communications Act
    1998 and its subsequent amendment offer further protection. Together
    these have removed the legal and linguistic barriers which previously
    had hampered prosecutions.

    The UK is now faced with a growth in inter-religious friction, sparked
    in large measure by conflict in the Middle East and the Indian
    subcontinent. This has led to the dissemination of propaganda
    deliberately attacking Jews qua Jews by Muslims. The Sikh and Hindu
    communities have similarly been targeted. We are in touch with
    representative bodies within these communities and can provide
    examples of such incitement. The Board of Deputies welcomes the
    proposal to introduce new laws to combat incitement to religious
    hatred, but notes that this must be matched by the political will to
    prosecute offenders. Otherwise any new powers risk becoming as
    ineffective as the existing laws against incitement to racial hatred.
    "It's not enough, already! Ve vont more laws! No free speech for ze
    vicked goyim!" And Mark Steyn isn't tackling another vital question:
    that of how Muslims got into the West in such large numbers to join
    the Jew-initiated, Jew-continued assault on free speech. Was there any
    popular support for mass immigration by Muslims in Britain, for
    example? No, there wasn't: there was massive popular opposition. But
    what does the will of the people matter in a democracy? Britain is run
    for the benefit of those who fund its political parties: men like
    "Lord" Levy, his pals from Jewish Care, and David Abrahams, whose
    excuse for conspiring to make secret payments to New Labour was that
    he wanted to avoid the appearance of "a Jewish conspiracy". That's
    what democracy means in Britain: Jews pay, pols obey. Want thought
    crime laws? You got 'em! Want mass immigration? You got it! Want war
    in Iraq? You got that too!

    Stone is president of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality
    Stone wants to keep "racism" high on the agenda because he wants to
    keep bashing whites. How racist is Britain? Very racist - against
    whites. When you trace the sources of the "Hammer Honky!" religion,
    you find that Jews are there every time, controlling, "advising",
    passing laws to suppress white dissent. Free speech is indeed the
    bedrock of a free society, which is why free societies and Jews don't
    mix. Those are the joys of Judeocracy and they'll keep on coming until
    we take our societies back.

    Full article at
    http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/joyim.html

    www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

    http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dr. Jai Maharaj@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 1 17:21:47 2016
    XPost: alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.indian, alt.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.india

    UNIVERSITIES BECOMING INCUBATORS OF JIHAD VIRUS

    By Balbir Punj
    Editorial
    The Pioneer
    http://www.dailypioneer.com
    Monday, February 29, 2016

    When, under the cover of free speech, elite institutions
    such as the Jawaharlal Nehru University, become breeding
    grounds for a vile ideology, it's the state's moral
    responsibility to intervene and draw the line

    While the media was excited about the events at
    Jawaharlal Nehru University, an important event in
    Pampore in Kashmir was swept under the carpet. In
    Pampore, Pakistan-trained terrorists infiltrated a
    Government building, took hostages as they hit hard at
    the security forces, killing two senior Army officers and
    several jawans as they settled into a long-drawn
    struggle.

    Now, such incidents in Kashmir have become common enough
    and may not deserve screaming headlines. But this time
    there was a speciality that the media, by and large,
    seemed to ignore. As the Army was seeking to flush out
    terrorists from the building and also rescue the
    civilians trapped inside, hundreds of agitators lined up
    across the building, separated from the action spot only
    by a rivulet.

    The mob had wanted to rush to the encounter site and form
    a human wall to protect the militants from the Army's
    assault. When the police stopped them, they started
    shouting slogans hailing Pakistan and running down India.
    As police used teargas shells to keep the stone pelting
    mob at bay, a mosque nearby used loudspeakers to
    supplement the anti-India tirade.

    Continues at:

    http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/edit/universities-becoming-incubators-of-jihad-virus.html

    Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
    Om Shanti

    http://bit.do/jaimaharaj

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)