• -- WE'VE NOW PERMANENTLY INHIBITED THESE CATHOLIC / HETERODOX {#1827 =

    From dolf@21:1/5 to fool for Christ on Fri Feb 15 06:50:41 2019
    XPost: soc.culture.pacific-island, alt.culture.african, alt.fan.countries.ghana XPost: alt.politics.africa

    GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364 - SAINT
    ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE: 4 x #364 + #371 - 30 NOVEMBER}; @7 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 - *DIALECTICS* *OF* *CONTRADICTIONS* *ON* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING* / @274 - PERFUME}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION
    {#273 - ADOLF HITLER'S IDEA @235 AS VIEW OF BIBLE STUDENTS: "AIDING,
    WILLINGLY or UNWILLINGLY THE DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE"}

    WE'VE NOW PERMANENTLY INHIBITED THESE CATHOLIC / HETERODOX {

    #1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN COUNCIL

    #1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
    eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
    *TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
    MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

    This precinct is a VASSAL ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE and the BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION also coincides with ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL'S REFUSAL OF
    EUCHARIST COMMUNION (*BEING* *AN* *ACT* *OF* *TREASON*) PERPETUATED
    AGAINST THE #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL OF RAINBOW SASH PROTESTORS at
    SAINT PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL, EAST MELBOURNE upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
    1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOERWARS19980531.jpg>

    [IMAGE: *MYSELF* consoling Catholic mother of a gay son & PFLAG
    President, Nanette McGregor - The Rainbow Sash Protest (Refusal of
    Communion) on 'Pentecost Sunday' 31 May 1998, Saint Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne pictured by The Australian newspaper (front page) of 1 June 1998

    (c) 1 June 1998 - James Croucher (photographer), News Ltd / Newspix,
    Commercial Use, Internal Use For Company Or Organisation, Internal
    Newsletter Or Document, Print And Digital, Up To 1,000]

    } TRINITARIANS CAPACITY TO ABOMINATE THE TRUTH {#2184 : / 6 = #364; / 7
    = #312; /8 = #273} OF EMANATIONISM

    SUBJECT WAS: To Him, therefore, let all come who would be made whole

    On 15/2/19 1:25 am, fool for Christ wrote:
    to the end that He might show that the law of the flesh has been subjected
    to the law of the mind. He was incarnate, that He, the Teacher of men,
    might overcome as man."

    St. Ambrose of Milan.

    "He that loveth silver shall not be satisfied with silver; nor he that
    loveth abundance with increase: this is also vanity." Ecclesiastes 5:10

    Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.


    — RUSSIAN COURT SENTENCES DANISH JEHOVAH'S WITNESS TO JAIL FOR
    'EXTREMISM': THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT LEGAL DILEMMA AS
    IMPASSE IS A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT?

    (c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 February 2019

    Due to Jehovah’s Witnesses intolerance within Australia, I recently
    conveyed (before World War One 2018 Centennial #273 - REMEMBRANCE) a
    rescinding to the good grace and assistance I had rendered them with
    respects to their depiction within Adolf Hitler’s Table Talk IDEAS: @215
    and @235 (from memory).

    Their haughty self bestowal of entitlement and lack of appreciation (as
    if they were the prerogative benefactors of the wise men from the East
    at an infant’s birth) was an appalling #312 - CONTRADICTION of human
    dignity as they sit like King Tutankhamen within our clock tower town
    square.

    H7287@{
       @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
       @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
       @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
       @4: Sup: 58 (#134); Ego: 4 (#58),
       @5: Sup: 27 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 50 (#108),
       @6: Sup: 32 (#193); Ego: 5 (#113),
       Male: #193; Feme: #113
    } // #275 < -- SEE IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @275 -
    *UNCONTESTED* *SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

    THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
    at Elephantine; I am not rapacious.

        #VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
        #TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
        #POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
        #TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
        #CANON: #102

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
       @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
       @2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
       @3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
       @4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
       Male: #76; Feme: #102
    } // #102

    #275 as [#6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5] = radah (H7287): {UMBRA: #8 as #209
    % #41 = #4} 1) to rule, have dominion, dominate, tread down; 2) to
    scrape out; 1a) (Qal) to have dominion, rule, subjugate; 1b) (Hiphil) to
    cause to dominate; 2a) (Qal) to scrape, scrape out;

    In doing so I specifically conveyed the references to the REDUCTIO AD
    HITLERUM: "If you wish to wage war successfully or to lead a people successfully through a difficult period of its history, you must have no
    doubts whatever on one point—namely, any individual who in such times
    tries, either actively or passively, to exclude himself from the
    activities of the community, must be destroyed.

    Anyone who for false reasons of mercy deviates from this clear principle
    is aiding {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, willingly {H7521: ratsah /
    accept: #273} or unwillingly {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273; H4784:
    marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, the dissolution of
    the State." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: @235, page #519]

    JEN KELLY (HERALDSUN.COM.AU) ON 18 JULY 2017: "If you’re sifting through
    old family memorabilia from before World War II and stumble across a
    swastika or two, don’t be alarmed:

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ChristianWeddingsWithSwastikas.jpeg>

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ChristianWeddingsWithSwastikas1.jpeg>

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ChristianWeddingsWithSwastikas2.jpeg>

    This ancient religious symbol [is claimed by some to] simply represented
    good luck until HITLER adopted it in the lead-up to World War II and it
    became synonymous with the Nazis’ atrocities.”

    Anyone who for false reasons of mercy deviates from this clear principle
    is aiding {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, willingly {H7521: ratsah /
    accept: #273} or unwillingly {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273; H4784:
    marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, the dissolution of
    the State." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: @235, page #519]

    <https://www.biblewheel.com/GR/GR_Database.php?SearchBy_Gematria=273>

    JEN KELLY (HERALDSUN.COM.AU) ON 18 JULY 2017: “Joan WITHERS of
    Mornington, says our story on Echuca’s Swastika Orchestra of the 1930’s
    and the original meaning of the symbol solved a longstanding mystery for
    her.

    She had long wondered about a photo (pictured above) she has of her
    mother, Margaret, as a bridesmaid in the early 1930s. ‘The bride (ie. a neophyte of Pythagorean Babylon Whoredom and anti-semitism / seventh-day adventism) had a beautiful (ie. Hell-bent) wedding gown and right out
    around the front (on the train) was a swastika embroidered into the
    lace,’ Joan says.

    ‘It always fascinated me, and now I know why it was there.’

    A swastika also features in this wedding photo (also shown above),
    believed to be from the late 1920s, of John KEANE’s (ie. Irish Roman
    Catholic heritage) great-aunt Isobel’s wedding, showing his late mother
    on the far right, probably as maid of honour. The bride is carrying a
    bouquet, a horseshoe—and a swastika.

    ‘Our thoughts are that it was just something you bought from a bridal
    shop as a good-luck charm,’ says John, of Montrose.”

    IN EXPLAINING HITLER'S STATEMENT RELATIVE TO SECTION VIII OF QUEEN
    VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 I HAVE ADDED WHAT IS
    PERCEIVED TO BE THE COMMON #273 - CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING:

    "AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273},
    WILLINGLY {H7521: ratsah / accept: #273} or
    UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273; H4784: marah / rebel:
    #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE."

    — WE #273 - REMEMBER YOUR FORGET —

    “LEST WE FORGET.
    TO FIRST #288 - REMEMBER.
    THIS NATION’S TUNE.
    AS SOVEREIGN BEGET.
    ISN’T NAZI DISTEMPER.
    BUT BY PRIVY TRIBUNE.
    NO #364 - OBEY, #312 - AID, #273 - ASSIST REGRET.”

    HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW: "I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE*
    *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL}, *NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 -
    *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE} wedding husband. To have and to hold
    #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY* *FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for
    richer or poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY*
    until death do we part, today I pledge my faithfulness."

    SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
    AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
    BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 -
    SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
    GENERAL {

    #2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 =
    #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001

    <-- *IN* *CASE* *YOU* *MISSED* *THE* *REALITY*

    }, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH
    PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF
    THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS
    ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE
    OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."

    SBS NEWS ON 7 FEBRUARY 2019: “Russia has banned the religion under anti-extremism laws and a crackdown on believers has intensified, with
    around 90 criminal trials now reportedly pending across Russia.”

    <https://www.sbs.com.au/news/russian-court-sentences-danish-jehovah-s-witness-to-jail-for-extremism>

    Those Bible students are a nasty piece of work as American espionage and
    so it is little wonder that the Russians are troubled by their
    disloyalties to the State as reasonable #364 - QUESTIONS of #430 - LAW.

    EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #4: IS METAPHYSICS POSSIBLE AT
    ALL? AS IDEAS @275 - *UNCONTESTED* *SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*:
    "For long before we began to question nature methodically, we questioned
    just our isolated reason, which already was practiced to a certain
    extent [IDEA: @272] through common experience: for reason surely is
    present to us always, but laws of nature must normally be sought out painstakingly; and so metaphysics was floating at the top like foam,
    though in such a way that as soon as what had been drawn off had
    dissolved, more showed itself on the surface, which some *ALWAYS*
    *GATHERED* *UP* *EAGERLY*, *WHILE* *OTHERS*, *INSTEAD* *OF* *SEEKING*
    *THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *THIS* *PHENOMENON* *IN* *THE* *DEPTHS*, *THOUGHT* *THEMSELVES* *WISE* *IN* *MOCKING* *THE* *FRUITLESS* *TOIL* *OF* *THE* *FORMER*.

    WITH RESPECTS TO SUBSTANTIATING THE CLAIM OF IMPETUS OF *PRO* *DOMO* BY
    A LOGICAL FALLACY OF DUPLICITOUS REDEFINITION BY #288 - UMBRA
    MANIPULATION MADE TO CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING #311 AGAINST MY
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THAT OF IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA PUBLISHED
    WITHIN 1783 WHICH DUE TO HIS FORMER RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IS AS PREVIOUSLY
    SHOWN ALREADY COGNISANT OF THE SPECTRUM AS HEBREW (22 / 7 as RATIONAL
    PI) and GREEK (24) IPSO FACTO: #2184 CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING THAT
    ARE EXHIBITED WITHIN ASSOCIATIONS MADE TO TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS
    OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL
    CATEGORICAL APRIORITY IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*:

    + 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
    DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
    33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
    *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

    + 0, 9 {IDEA:  @282}, 18  {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
    - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

    + 0, 3  {IDEA:  @270}, 6  {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
    *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

    + 1  {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
    *FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME
    AS *RUSSIAN* *DIALECTS* *OF* #312 - *CONTRADICTIONS* *ON* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING*}, 3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF*
    *PROGRESSION* OF INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}

    Kant’s implementation of SYMBOLICAL associator to the NOUMENON as having
    a #41 - *ONTIC* necessity with CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING which incontrovertibly conform to a COGNITION of a trinomial as HOMOIOS THEORY
    OF NUMBER that has a definitive impetus from 1783 and thusly we can by
    such APRIORITY CASCADE against subsequent HISTORY and is capable of
    BEREAVING SOVEREIGN STATES of IDENTITY which as MARRIAGE / SOVEREIGN
    DYNAMIC has been built on castles of SAND which deploys a microcosm
    binomial redefinition (HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER: #17 - Politics;
    I-Ching: H54 - *MARRIAGEABLE* *MAID*/*MAIDEN*, *CONVERTING* *THE*
    *MAIDEN*; Tetra: 65 - Inner) of those APRIORITY trinomial CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING.

    SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
    @1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
    @2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
    @3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
    - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
    @4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
    @5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
    *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
    @6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
    @7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
    *DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
    *PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
    @8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
    Ego: 61 (#348),
    @9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
    *SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
    Male: #266; Feme: #390
    }

    Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
    *SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

    <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

    HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
    @1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
    @2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
    @3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
    - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
    @4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
    @5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
    *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
    @6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
    @7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
    @8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
    SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
    MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD),
    @9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
    DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
    33 AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
    Male: #311; Feme: #391
    } // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

    Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ
    {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION
    OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH
    {#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* OR *IMMUTABLE* / *STUBBORN* *WILL* / #435}

    <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

    #311 as [#70, #10, #20, #10, #1, #200] = oikia (G3614): {UMBRA: #21 as
    #111 % #41 = #29} 1) a house; 1a) an inhabited edifice, a dwelling; 1b)
    the inmates of a house, the family; 1c) property, wealth, goods;

    #311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
    #22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
    (which relates to the cultivation of mind and morals, and employs for
    this purpose now commands and admonitions, now reproof and punishment)
    It also includes the training and care of the body; 2) whatever in
    adults also cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting mistakes and curbing passions.; 2a) instruction which aims at increasing virtue; 2b)
    chastisement, chastening, (of the evils with which God visits men for
    their amendment);

    Weary therefore of dogmatism, which teaches us nothing, and also of
    [IDEA: @274] skepticism, which promises us absolutely nothing at all,
    not even the tranquility of a permitted ignorance; summoned by the
    importance of the knowledge that we need, and made mistrustful, through
    long experience, with respect to any knowledge that we believe we
    possess or that offers itself to us under the title of pure reason,
    there remains left for us but one critical question, the answer to which
    can regulate our future conduct: Is metaphysics possible at all? But
    this question must not be answered by skeptical objections to particular assertions of an actual metaphysics (for at present we still allow none
    to be valid), but out of the still problematic concept of such a science.

    In the Critique of Pure Reason I worked on this question synthetically,
    namely by inquiring within pure reason itself, and seeking to determine
    within this source both the elements and the laws of its pure use,
    according to principles. This work is difficult and requires a resolute
    reader to think himself little by little into a system that takes no
    foundation as given except reason itself, and that therefore tries to
    develop cognition out of its original seeds without relying on any fact whatever. Prolegomena should by contrast be preparatory exercises; they
    ought more to indicate what needs to be done in order to bring a science
    into existence if possible, than to present the science itself. They
    must therefore rely on something [IDEA: @275] already known to be
    dependable, from which we can go forward with confidence and ascend to
    the sources, which are not yet known, and whose discovery not only will
    explain what is known already, but will also exhibit an area with many cognitions that all arise from these same sources. The methodological
    procedure of prolegomena, and especially of those that are to prepare
    for a future metaphysics, will therefore be analytic.

    Fortunately, it happens that, even though we cannot assume that meta-
    physics as science is actual, we can confidently say that some pure
    synthetic cognition a priori is actual and given, namely, pure
    mathematics and pure natural science; for both contain propositions that
    are fully acknowledged, some as apodictically certain through bare
    reason, some from universal agreement with experience (though these are
    still recognized as independent of experience). We have therefore some
    at least *UNCONTESTED* *SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*, and we do
    not need to ask whether it is possible (for it is actual), but only: how
    it is possible, in order to be able to derive, from the principle of the possibility of the given cognition, the possibility of all other
    synthetic cognition a priori." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY
    FUTURE METAPHYSICS (1783), IDEA @275]

    Thus they cannot legitimately claim as legal defence that Russian #615 - JURISPRUDENCE is in any manner equivalent to Nazi Germany’s atrocity of
    such partial Bible students whom exhibit a disloyalty to the State’s
    #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC CONCEPTION to #902 - RULE OF LAW which is then
    causal for disheartening the #65 - TROOPS.

    GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364 - SAINT
    ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE: 4 x #364 + #371 - 30 NOVEMBER}; @7 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 - *DIALECTICS* *OF* *CONTRADICTIONS* *ON* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING* / @274 - PERFUME}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION
    {#273 - ADOLF HITLER'S IDEA @235 AS VIEW OF BIBLE STUDENTS: "AIDING,
    WILLINGLY or UNWILLINGLY THE DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE"}

    WE'VE NOW PERMANENTLY INHIBITED THESE CATHOLIC / HETERODOX {#1827 = 4 x
    #364 + #371 - LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN COUNCIL

    #1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
    eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
    *TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
    MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

    This precinct is a VASSAL ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE and the BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION also coincides with ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL'S REFUSAL OF
    EUCHARIST COMMUNION (*BEING* *AN* *ACT* *OF* *TREASON*) PERPETUATED
    AGAINST THE #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL OF RAINBOW SASH PROTESTORS at
    SAINT PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL, EAST MELBOURNE upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOERWARS19980531.jpg>

    [IMAGE: *MYSELF* consoling Catholic mother of a gay son & PFLAG
    President, Nanette McGregor - The Rainbow Sash Protest (Refusal of
    Communion) on 'Pentecost Sunday' 31 May 1998, Saint Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne pictured by The Australian newspaper (front page) of 1 June 1998

    (c) 1 June 1998 - James Croucher (photographer), News Ltd / Newspix,
    Commercial Use, Internal Use For Company Or Organisation, Internal
    Newsletter Or Document, Print And Digital, Up To 1,000]

    } TRINITARIANS CAPACITY TO ABOMINATE THE TRUTH {#2184 : / 6 = #364; / 7
    = #312; /8 = #273} OF EMANATIONISM

    MOSCOW TIMES @ 0902 HOURS ON 8 FEBRUARY 2019: "KREMLIN SAYS DON'T LOOK
    FOR COMMON SENSE FROM RUSSIA'S RULERS: Don’t rely on common sense if you
    want to understand how modern Russia is run. That’s the advice from
    President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov.

    'In governing, we can’t operate on the basis of common sense,' Peskov
    told reporters Thursday on a conference call. 'First of all, we operate
    in terms of what is legal and illegal.'

    It’s unclear whether the law and common sense are entirely separate
    concepts in Putin’s Russia, where critics have long alleged that the
    Kremlin has bent parliament, the courts and the media to his personal
    will. Peskov was responding to a question on a six-year jail term handed
    to Dennis Christensen, a Danish Jehovah’s Witness, by a regional Russian court on Wednesday.

    Russia’s Supreme Court banned Jehovah’s Witnesses after declaring it an extremist organization in 2017. Putin said in December that persecuting religious groups on grounds of extremism or terrorism is 'complete
    nonsense.'

    'Common sense is something that, of course, must be present everywhere,
    always and constantly, but it can’t be a criterion,' said Peskov, of the decision. 'The criterion is the understanding of the law and, in that
    case, it can only be the decision of the court.'

    The Kremlin’s governing philosophy is more subtle in practice: Russians understand that the state has a monopoly on repression, while never
    knowing when and whether it will resort to such methods because the
    rules don’t apply equally to everyone." [<https://themoscowtimes.com/news/kremlin-says-dont-look-for-common-sense-from-russias-rulers-64437>]

    THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT RUSSIAN LEGAL DILEMMA AS IMPASSE IS
    A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT?
    What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
    systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
    world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
    framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
    you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
    which you won’t negotiate.

Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system, or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a
    meme. Just as genes carry the informational codes for our biological
    DNA, these value systems supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with
    “themes”) that determine our “cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking at the world that, like contagious
    viruses, spread from brain to brain through word of mouth, through
    media, through interaction between people. The third angel’s message is
    a meme. Net ’98 was a global memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.

There are more than 6 billion people in the world today, and though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic value systems or memes. Researchers studying this
    topic have identified only eight thus far.

    But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
    A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER: @1 {#1} + @2
    {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can colour-code
    them (Figure A).

    PARADIGMATIC (coral)
    WHOLISTIC (cyan)
    SYSTEMIC (yellow)
    HUMANISTIC (green)
    MATERIALISTIC (orange)
    ABSOLUTISTIC (blue)
    EGOCENTRIC (red)
    ANIMISTIC (purple)
    AUTOMATIC (bronze)

    [Figure A (proposed)]

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>

    [IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
    cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are aligned]

    When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
    out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
    influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
    them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
    forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
    what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).

Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented express-the-self (warm colours)
    and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool colours). Note also the
    differences people value the most in each system as they flow from
    survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to raw power and
    instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to strategies
    for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to alternative
    forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its natural
    form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the ideal that
    God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist Review: 27th April 2000]

    AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
    C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
    O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
    R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
    *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
    INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
    HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
    A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
    L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
    PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
    (#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}

    EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THIRD SECTION: ON THE PURE
    CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES AS IDEA @B103: "[IDEA: @A76
    / @B102] General logic (as has already been said several times)
    abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits representations to
    be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may be, so that,
    proceeding analytically, it can first transform these representations
    into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a manifold of
    sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental aesthetic
    offers to it in order to provide material [IDEA: @A77] for the pure
    concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without any
    content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a manifold
    of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless belong to the
    conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone representations
    of objects can be received, and which must therefore ever affect the
    concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought demands that the manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined in a specific
    manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call this act synthesis.

    By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
    [IDEA: @B103] the act of adding diverse representations to one another,
    and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
    is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
    the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
    content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
    (whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
    cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
    actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
    specific content; it is therefore the first [IDEA: @A78] thing to which
    we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.

    Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
    imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
    without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
    hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
    function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
    the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.

    The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
    [IDEA: @B104] understanding. Under this synthesis I include that which
    rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
    of unity (e.g., *THE* *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
    synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

    [IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT

    This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
    a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

    'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
    #371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC OVERLAY']

    Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
    matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
    but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
    the sake [IDEA: @A79] of the cognition of all objects is the manifold of
    pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
    give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
    requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the understanding." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES, pp 164-166]

    EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF
    THE PURE UNDERSTANDING / PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)