• -- APPLYING THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE AS CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE (BREXIT STATE

    From dolf@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 17 08:41:36 2019
    XPost: soc.culture.pacific-island, alt.culture.african, alt.fan.countries.ghana XPost: alt.politics.africa

    — ON BEING HUMAN v’s ANIMAL NATURE: POPE FRANCIS IN ABJECT FEAR BECAUSE
    OF HOMOSEXUALS LEGAL ACTION OVER NO LONGER TOLERATING ROMAN CATHOLIC IMMORALITY, BLASPHEMY AND PUBLIC SLANDER

    (c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 17 January, 2019

    YOUTUBE: "Absolutely Fabulous (Pet Shop Boys)

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YjDMmjgKec>

    TOP 4 PLAY @ 0908 HOURS ON 14 JANUARY 2019: “Fair call, Reg stuff, the usual”

    DOLF @ 0909 HOURS ON 14 JANUARY 2019: “If I can be explicit and say that
    it is possible to assay your consciousness:

    usual] {@6: Sup: 9 (#243); Ego: 2 (#208)},

    Against Immanuel Kant’s prolegomena published in 1783. I did so only
    with this last comment...

    IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA IDEA @208: “They therefore contain in themselves, beyond intuition, also the matter for some object in general (through which something existing in space or time is represented),
    i.e., the real of sensation, hence a merely subjective representation
    through which one can only become conscious that the subject is affected
    and which one relates to an object in general.”

    That was IDEA: @208

    So you must explicitly say as I have an extraordinary capacity to know someone.”

    TOP 4 PLAY @ 0921 HOURS ON 14 JANUARY 2019: “Laymen's terms. Thanks”

    DOLF @ 0922 HOURS ON 14 JANUARY 2019: “I cannot get a feel of what you
    are saying about sexual acts because you are conveying a sense value
    only known to yourself.”

    TOP 4 PLAY @ 0923 HOURS ON 14 JANUARY 2019: “But in f@cking sucking etc
    reg stuff, not blood scat or that kinda shit”

    G3809@{
    @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
    @2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
    @3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
    (#91),
    @4: Sup: 14 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 4
    (#95),
    @5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
    @6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
    @7: Sup: 30 (#263); Ego: 1 (#111),
    @8: Sup: 68 (#331); Ego: 38 (#149),
    Male: #331; Feme: #149
    } // #311

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
    Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
    injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

    THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
    I am not given to cursing.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
    @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
    @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
    @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
    @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
    Male: #106; Feme: #177
    } // #177

    #311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
    #22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children (*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND* *AND* *MORALS*,
    *AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS* *AND*
    *ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also includes the *TRAINING* *AND* *CARE* *OF* *THE* *BODY*; 2) *WHATEVER* *IN* *ADULTS*
    *ALSO* *CULTIVATES* *THE* *SOUL*, *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *CORRECTING*
    *MISTAKES* *AND* *CURBING* *PASSIONS*; 2a) *INSTRUCTION* *WHICH* *AIMS*
    *AT* *INCREASING* *VIRTUE*; 2b) *CHASTISEMENT*, *CHASTENING*, (*OF*
    *THE* *EVILS* *WITH* *WHICH* *GOD* *VISITS* *MEN* *FOR* *THEIR*
    *AMENDMENT*);

    YOUTUBE: "IT'S A SIN (Pet Shop Boys)

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRHetRTOD1Q>

    "And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up
    in the nurture {#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): chastening} and admonition of the Lord." [Ephesians 6:4 (KJV)]

    "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for
    doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction {#311 as [#80,
    #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): chastening} in righteousness:" [2Timothy 3:16 (KJV)]

    "And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening {#311 as [#80, #1,
    #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): chastening} of the Lord,
    nor faint when thou art rebuked of him:" [Hebrews 12:5 (KJV)]

    "If ye endure chastening {#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200]
    = paideia (G3809): chastening}, God dealeth with you as with sons; for
    what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?" [Hebrews 12:7 (KJV)]

    "But if ye be without chastisement {#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10,
    #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): chastening}, whereof all are partakers,
    then are ye bastards, and not sons." [Hebrews 12:8 (KJV)]

    "Now no- chastening {#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] =
    paideia (G3809): chastening} for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby-." [Hebrews 12:11 (KJV)]

    DOLF @ 0925 HOURS ON 14 JANUARY 2019: “And as Kant says in 1783 it’s
    merely subjective and needs to convey a consciousness of reality and you
    have done that with the last statement.”

    TOP 4 PLAY @ 2209 HOURS ON 15 JANUARY 2019: “Cut the shit, talking
    regular not as if your writing bloody essay or some legal document.”

    DOLF @ 0106 HOURS ON 16 JANUARY 2019: “The problem with ignorance is
    that it doesn’t know how wretched it is to transgress nature and so it
    has no human dignity.

    In case you didn’t get what human means:

    HOMO [iOS] = #205 + #164 = #369 + #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (as #390 - SOVEREIGN #391 - PRINCIPLES of Queen Victoria’s #873 - Letters Patent 29 OCTOBER 1900 which must be respected)

    SAPIEN [S/T] - wisdom thinker / think rationally in accordance with
    ontic necessity as moral principles.

    Such that you don’t even know what #2184 - FREEDOM from #1827 -
    OPPRESSION is:

    #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
    necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins):

    WHEREAS, by an Act of Parliament passed on the ninth day of July One
    thousand nine hundred, in the Sixty fourth year of Our reign, intiluled
    “An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia,” it is enacted that “it shall be lawful for the Queen,” with the advice of the Privy
    Council, to declare by Proclamation that, on and after a day therein
    appointed, not being later than one year after this passing of this Act,
    the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland,
    and Tasmania, and also, if Her Majesty is satisfied that the people of
    Western Australia have agreed thereto, of Western Australia, shall be
    united in a Federal Commonwealth under the name of the Commonwealth of Australia. But the Queen may, at any time after Proclamation, appoint a Governor General for the Commonwealth:

    #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
    PRIVY COUNCIL}: #41 X#12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*}), and

    #391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900 AS BY
    PROCLAMATION SHALL BE UNITED IN A FEDERAL COMMONWEALTH}) OF CIVIL SOCIETY

    That inhumanity as a lack of sapience is then an endless conflict
    against nature itself."

    Nous: #41
    Time: 11:30 hrs
    Date: 2019.9.15
    Torah: [#20, #6, #100]@{
    @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
    @2: Sup: 26 (#46); Ego: 6 (#26),
    @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 19 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
    Male: #91; Feme: #45 - *MAGIC* *SUM* *OF* #3 x #3 *SQUARE*
    } // #126

    Dao: Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference
    Tetra: #60 - Accumulation
    I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
    Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy

    Latin: Exultabundus {God who gives joy} Alt: Lavyah {Desireless Nature
    of God} {

    1. HELPS RECOVER THE FRIENDSHIP OF THOSE WE'VE OFFENDED
    2. WILLS
    3. FRIENDLY DISTRIBUTION
    4. Aphoso
    }

    Rehoboam {Who sets the people at liberty}

    Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237
    - *DETERMINED* *WILL* / #435}

    <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

    .jackNote@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: 2019.9.15, Time: 11:30
    hrs, Super: #311 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications;
    I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation;
    Tetra: 52 - Measure, Ego: #391 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness
    in Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force,
    Great Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage,
    Potential energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation]

    HUMAN BEING (3.5.5.41.0)@{
    @1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
    @2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
    @3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
    - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
    @4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
    @5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
    *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
    @6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
    @7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
    @8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311),
    @9: Sup: 67 (#311); Ego: 80 (#391),
    Male: #311; Feme: #391
    } // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

    IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #27 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY AS
    IDEA @311: "Here is now the place to dispose thoroughly of the Humean (7
    May 1711 NS (26 April 1711 OS) – 25 August 1776)) doubt. He rightly
    affirmed: that we in no way have insight through reason into the
    possibility of causality, i.e., the possibility of relating the
    existence of one thing to the existence of some other thing that would necessarily be posited through the first one. *I* *ADD* *TO* *THIS*
    *THAT* *WE* *HAVE* *JUST* *AS* *LITTLE* *INSIGHT* *INTO* *THE* *CONCEPT*
    *OF* *SUBSISTENCE*: {

    *AS* *THE* *ACTION* *OR* *FACT* *OF* *MAINTAINING* *OR* *SUPPORTING*
    *ONESELF* *AT* *A* *MINIMUM* *LEVEL* *AND* [*CHIEFLY* *IN* *LAW*] *THE*
    *STATE* *OF* *REMAINING* *IN* *FORCE* *OR* *EFFECT*:

    #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
    PRIVY COUNCIL}: #41 X#12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS:

    #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

    *SUBSISTIT* *IN* (subsists in) is a Latin phrase, which appears in the
    eighth paragraph of *LUMEN* *GENTIUM*, a landmark document promulgated
    by Pope Paul VI on 21 November 1964 associated to the Second Vatican
    Council of the Catholic Church (began: 11 October 1962) and which
    adopted a new liturgical calendar: #1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - SAINT
    ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE:

    This Church constituted and organized in the world as a society,
    subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of
    Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him, although many elements
    of sanctification and of truth are found outside of its visible
    structure. These elements, as gifts belonging to the Church of Christ,
    are forces impelling toward catholic unity.

    Haec Ecclesia, in hoc mundo ut societas constituta et ordinata,
    subsistit in Ecclesia catholica, a successore Petri et Episcopis in eius communione gubernata, licet extra eius compaginem elementa plura sanctificationis et veritatis inveniantur, quae ut dona Ecclesiae
    Christi propria, ad unitatem catholicam impellunt.

    This sentence and the correct meaning of "subsists in" affects the
    definition of the Church with important implications for how the
    Catholic Church views itself, its relations with other Christian
    communities and other religions. Questions have been raised, if Lumen
    gentium reworded the longstanding phrase, which stated that the Church
    of Christ is (Latin est) the Catholic Church. *LUMEN* *GENTIUM* *DOES* *RECOGNIZE* *THAT* *OTHER* *CHRISTIAN* *ECCLESIAL* *COMMUNITIES* *HAVE* *ELEMENTS* *OF* *SANCTIFICATION* *AND* *OF* *TRUTH*. [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsistit_in>]

    } THAT IS *OF* *THE* *NECESSITY* *THAT* *A* *SUBJECT*, *WHICH* *ITSELF* *CANNOT* *BE* *A* *PREDICATE* *OF* *ANY* *OTHER* *THING*, *SHOULD*
    *UNDERLIE* *THE* *EXISTENCE* *OF* *THINGS* – nay, that we cannot frame
    any concept of the possibility of any such thing (although we can point
    out examples of its use in experience); and I also add that this very incomprehensibility affects the community of things as well, since we
    have no insight whatsoever into how, from the state of one thing, a
    consequence could be drawn about the state of completely different
    things outside it (and vice versa), and into how substances, each of
    which has its own separate existence, should depend on one another and
    should indeed do so necessarily. Nonetheless, I am very far from [IDEA:
    @311] taking these concepts to be merely borrowed from experience, and
    from taking the necessity represented in them to be falsely imputed and
    a mere illusion through which long habit deludes us; rather, I have sufficiently shown that they and the principles taken from them stand
    firm a priori prior to all experience, and have their undoubted
    objective correctness, though of course only with respect to experience.
    " [page 62]

    #1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
    #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
    (1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
    Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
    decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

    #2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
    as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
    - Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
    / #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

    #3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
    Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
    Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
    Rejoices in its Nature]

    3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
    #5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
    child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
    children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
    (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
    un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
    (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

    #4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
    {FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 - Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INRI /
    Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
    5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
    Nature Surmounts Nature]

    #5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
    {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 - Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
    Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

    #6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
    Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke 1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
    Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
    / bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
    Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

    #7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
    #287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
    excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INRI AS TERNIO
    ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
    Autonomous Nature]

    G316@{
       @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
       @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
       @3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
       @4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
       @5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
       @6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
       @7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
       @8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
       @9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
       Male: #365; Feme: #125
    } // #287

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
    Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
    Circle;

    THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
    even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

        #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
        #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
        #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
        #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
        #CANON: #150

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
       @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
       @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
       @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
       @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
    I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
       Male: #177; Feme: #150
    } // #150

    7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
    (G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
    without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
    1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
    *WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]

    #1 - unwillingness
    #2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
    definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

    *VOLUNTY* (noun):
    [ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
    from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
    - (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
    creation, etc.
    - *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
    as mountains and dwellings.
    - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
    philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
    the natural world.

    *NOLUNTY* (noun):
    [ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
    from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
    - (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, destruction, etc.
    - *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
    in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA* *MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
    - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
    philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
    natural world.
    - Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
    Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
    I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

    I was upon 2 January, 2017 served with an Application and Summons for an Intervention Order as Case Number: G13559325 dated 30 December, 2016 so
    as to present myself by 0930 HOURS on 11 January, 2017 before the SALE MAGISTRATE'S COURT in the determination of the matter and any decision
    to make a final determination is the issuing of a Personal Safety
    Intervention Order.

    On that date I provided the SALE MAGISTRATES COURT with material details
    of a complaint relating to "Crimes Against Humanity as War Crimes
    Constituting Treason" and included the follow argumentation (which was
    rejected by the COURT) with respects to a #364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF A HUMAN BEING under the Charter of Human
    Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006.

    42. My intention in tabling these matters before the local Sale
    Magistrates Court is to give notice to the judicatory of my having
    superseded the original Letters Patent to the Federation of the
    Commonwealth of Australia of 1901 as then a right of succession being
    lawfully granted to me. I’m therefore requesting "a stay of
    proceedings" in having "a question of law arises that relates to the application of this Charter" as then a recourse to PART 3—APPLICATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN VICTORIA, DIVISION 3—INTERPRETATION OF LAWS as the consideration of "33 - REFERRAL TO SUPREME COURT" and “34
    ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S RIGHT TO INTERVENE” which is an authority granted by
    the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006:

    33 - REFERRAL TO SUPREME COURT
    (1) If, in a proceeding before a court or tribunal, a question of law
    arises that relates to the application of this Charter or a question
    arises with respect to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Charter, that question may be referred to the
    Supreme Court if—
    (a) a party has made an application for referral; and
    (b) the court or tribunal considers that the question is appropriate for determination by the Supreme Court.

    (2) If a question has been referred to the Supreme Court under
    subsection (1), the court or tribunal referring the question must not—
    (a) make a determination to which the question is relevant while the
    referral is pending; or
    (b) proceed in a manner or make a determination that is inconsistent
    with the opinion of the Supreme Court on the question.

    (3) If a question is referred under subsection (1) by the Trial Division
    of the Supreme Court or by the County Court, the referral is to be made
    to the Court of Appeal.

    (4) Despite anything contained in any other Act, if a question arises of
    a kind referred to in subsection (1), that question may only be referred
    to the Supreme Court in accordance with this section.

    34 - ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S RIGHT TO INTERVENE
    (1) The Attorney-General may intervene in, and may be joined as a party
    to, any proceeding before any court or tribunal in which a question of
    law arises that relates to the application of this Charter or a question
    arises with respect to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Charter.

    (2) If the Attorney-General intervenes in a proceeding under this
    section, then, for the purpose of the institution and prosecution of an
    appeal from an order made in that proceeding, the Attorney- General may
    be taken to be a party to the proceeding.

    35 - NOTICE TO ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND COMMISSION
    (1) A party to a proceeding must give notice in the prescribed form to
    the Attorney-General and the Commission if—
    (a) in the case of a Supreme Court or County Court proceeding, a
    question of law arises that relates to the application of this Charter
    or a question arises with respect to the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this Charter; or
    (b) in any case, a question is referred to the Supreme Court under
    section 33.

    (2) For the purpose of subsection (1), a notice is not required to be
    given to—
    (a) the Attorney-General if the State is a party to the relevant
    proceeding; or
    (b) the Commission if the Commission is a party to the relevant proceeding.

    36 - DECLARATION OF INCONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
    (1) This section applies if—
    (a) in a Supreme Court proceeding a question of law arises that relates
    to the application of this Charter or a question arises with respect to
    the interpretation of a statutory provision in accordance with this
    Charter; or
    (b) the Supreme Court has had a question referred to it under section 33; or (c) an appeal before the Court of Appeal relates to a question of a kind referred to in paragraph (a).

    (2) Subject to any relevant override declaration, if in a proceeding the Supreme Court is of the opinion that a statutory provision cannot be interpreted consistently with a human right, the Court may make a
    declaration to that effect in accordance with this section.

    (3) If the Supreme Court is considering making a declaration of
    inconsistent interpretation, it must ensure that notice in the
    prescribed form of that fact is given to the Attorney-General and the Commission.

    (4) The Supreme Court must not make a declaration of inconsistent interpretation unless the Court is satisfied that—
    (a) notice in the prescribed form has been given to the Attorney-General
    and the Commission under subsection (3); and
    (b) a reasonable opportunity has been given to the Attorney-General and
    the Commission to intervene in the proceeding or to make submissions in
    respect of the proposed declaration of inconsistent interpretation.

    (5) A declaration of inconsistent interpretation does not—
    (a) affect in any way the validity, operation or enforcement of the
    statutory provision in respect of which the declaration was made; or
    (b) create in any person any legal right or give rise to any civil cause
    of action.

    (6) The Supreme Court must cause a copy of a declaration of inconsistent interpretation to be given to the Attorney-General—
    (a) if the period provided for the lodging of an appeal in respect of
    the proceeding in which the declaration was made has ended without such
    an appeal having been lodged, within 7 days after the end of that period; or (b) if on appeal the declaration is upheld, within 7 days after any
    appeal has been finalised.

    EXAMPLE: If the Trial Division of the Supreme Court makes a declaration
    of inconsistent interpretation (based on a referral of a question from
    VCAT) and on appeal the Court of Appeal upholds the declaration, a copy
    of the declaration must be sent to the Attorney-General within 7 days
    after the Court of Appeal's decision.

    (7) The Attorney-General must, as soon as reasonably practicable, give a
    copy of a declaration of inconsistent interpretation received under
    subsection (6) to the Minister administering the statutory provision in
    respect of which the declaration was made, unless the relevant Minister
    is the Attorney-General.

    43. There are three questions of law which then need to be considered by the Supreme Court:

    1) The charter defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question
    is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS
    A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHICH IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
    AND RATIONALITY.

    That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE.

    After all the ENNEAD of THOTH, expresses an Anthropic Cosmological
    Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being
    equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

    2) The second consideration is that my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the
    BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE and are the NATURE based
    'cosmic' elementals of the MATERIA PRIMA within the attribution of
    AUTONOMY OF WILL as being intrinsic to the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES.

    This understanding of human nature is in the imago Dei, 'the image of
    God’ in possessing as an attribute of being essential to the MATERIA
    PRIMA to the actual characteristic nature of the MIND as the idea that
    human beings are created in the imago Dei, 'the image of God’ and which
    is then the test which is applied to the authentic function that
    includes a reference to a power, authority and duty as to be *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING* AND *ASSISTING* the Governor General under the auspices of
    SECTION VIII to the Letters Patent for the Federation of the
    Commonwealth of Australia of 1901.

    Which human being as HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] is constituted in such a way
    that there is an analogy with the being of God?

    As then specifically the perennialist idea of which human being, as
    whether it is the Roman Caesar who by the Pythagorean HETEROS THEORY OF
    NUMBER as Roman Empire Governance is considered the Son of God (ie. HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN (YOU) dynamic) or the Apostle Paul {small; little}
    according to the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER as Torah (COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:5-9]) / Chinese DAOist Empire Governance is representative of the imago Dei, 'the image of God'.

    For a historical parallelism (ie. specifically: #0 CE (#6 - LI
    {Contrariety} / H38 Opposition, Polarising, Perversion) ... #15 CE (#7 -
    Chang {Ascent} / H46 Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending) ... #34 CE (#8 -
    Kan {Opposition} / H46 Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending) ... #65 CE (#9
    - Shu {Branching Out} / H19 Approaching, Nearing, The forest) .... #111
    CE (#10 - Hsien {Defectiveness / Distortion} / H62 Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing) ...) we may
    have recourse to the Apostle Paul's recorded experience as the appeal
    made to Caesar Nero (#666: #54 - #68 CE) and his imprisonment within
    Rome for two years which is conveyed by historical narrative as an
    overlay associated to core meta-descriptor prototypes.

    Given the consideration of oaths and 'Jewish Kabbalistic basis' to the
    Letters Patent of the Australian Constitution (1 January 1901) how then
    might Section 116 of the Constitution of Australia apply, in that it specifically precludes the Commonwealth of Australia (i.e., the federal parliament) from making laws for establishing any religion, imposing any religious observance, or prohibiting the free exercise of any religion.
    Section 116 also provides that no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

    3) Final consideration is whether prudent articulation of immutable
    evidence being then the additional justification relating to the
    IRREFUTABLE FACTS already summarily provided to you, as the substantial
    basis for my lawful and dignified claim as a public proclamation to a prerogative as to being considered the Sovereign Authority over the Commonwealth of Australia, which in the absence of any gainsay,
    depreciation, rancour and redundancy has sought by judicious, prudent
    and diligent means, the pursuit of virtue as a precious stone amongst
    the plethora of pleonasm, an opportunity to invalidate by superseding,
    the original instrumentation known as the Letters Patent to the said
    Federation of the Commonwealth of Australia of 1901.

    SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
    @1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
    @2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
    @3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123),
    @4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164),
    @5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205),
    @6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
    @7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
    @8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
    Ego: 61 (#348),
    @9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* ); Ego: 42 (#390 -
    *SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
    Male: #266; Feme: #390
    }

    Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
    *SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

    <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

    .jackNote@zen: 6, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: (none), Time: (none),

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)