[continued from previous message]

months, 4 months, 5 months, whatever it might be such that the arguments
- - -

...

KIRBY J: Does *BIRCHING* come up under any other head or is it only
available - - -

MR SOFRONOFF: It could only be torture, your Honour. If it is not
torture, and minds could differ about that - they obviously do because,
as we all know, somebody was caned in Singapore a few years ago. If it
is not torture then it is certainly a matter that would be - as a likely
or possible punishment, ought to be considered by the Minister before
sending - in that case it was a youthful offender. It was not extradited
but if it were an extradition case she would have to consider whether
that was a matter that would render it oppressive.

The purpose of my mentioning severe punishment is this, once one admits
that a severe punishment may be material, one admits that punishment is material and once one admits that punishment is material it can be
readily accepted, in our submission, that if what is being sought is extradition in circumstances where no significant punishment will be
imposed, the Minister may consider that that is something that renders
the surrender oppressive or too severe a punishment.

McHUGH J: But does not your argument lead to the conclusion that the
Attorney or Minister must examine the weight of the evidence to see
whether or not the person may be convicted?

MR SOFRONOFF: No, your Honour.

McHUGH J: Why not?

MR SOFRONOFF: Because one thing that does emerge from the Extradition
Act is that one does not have an occasion ever to test guilt or innocence.

McHUGH J: But why should not the Attorney have that obligation? If he
has got an obligation to consider the sentence, why should he not have
an obligation to consider the likelihood of conviction?

MR SOFRONOFF: Your Honour, I would answer the question that she would
have an obligation to consider the likelihood of conviction only if it
can be demonstrated that there is no real likelihood of conviction. That
would be a rare case, but I say that because there is authority in this
Court that that would be a matter that would render an extradition
oppressive. The case is - - -

HAYNE J: But that is likely, is it not - that is likely to take you over
to accusation not made in good faith? If there is no realistic prospect
of conviction, one is at once perhaps into the field of accusation not
in good faith and, if you are not in that territory, then where lies the
middle ground? [Copyright in the High Court of Australia, TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS. AT CANBERRA @ 1451 HRS ON THURSDAY 23 MARCH 2000]

<http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCATrans/2000/121.html>

I have followed GEERT WILDERS on TWITTER for the last year at least and
am aware by his RETWEETS that he indeed does continue to receive the
most graphically violent and depraved of death-treats (ie. having had
#419 - SLAUGHTERED MEAT placed in my mailbox on 15 NOVEMBER 2017 I know
how he feels), and his blog entry @ 0930 HRS ON 25 MAY 2023 which was
only on 24 JUNE 2023 accessed by a BING search, himself states:

"I RECEIVE THOUSANDS OF DEATH THREATS FROM MUSLIMS IN THE NAME OF THE
PROPHET MUHAMMAD. BUT WHO WAS HE REALLY?"

We would submit that since the OFFICE OF GOVERNOR GENERAL has an
EX-JUDICIAL AUTHORITY as implication established by #940 - RIGHT TO RULE
and according to #902 - RULE OF LAW, that in order to preserve the ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY FIRST PRINCIPLES being the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which as metakosemeo is constitutionally the product of a CAESAROPAPISM as intrinsic to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT and the
ontology of the human being (ie. homosapiens) reflecting IMAGO DEI,
within the circumstance of ICONOCLASM AGAINST THOSE FIRST PRINCIPLES
being the nature to "THOUSANDS OF DEATH THREATS OF THE MOST GRAPHIC AND
BESTIAL KIND" as the consequence of a FATWA calling for the Dutch politician’s beheading by an Australian IMAM named FEIZ MUHAMMAD to meet
the threshold of a demand for ACTION by the GOVERNOR GENERAL authorising
the *BIRCHING* of all such persons engaged in that ex-judicial impiety
by FATWA.

The notion of 'boy-pussy' was a smaller version of the cat-o-nine-tails
as known to being a colonial authoritative punishment instrument of
slavery / shipping and gave rise to the expression:

'Take it like a man'!

The last *BIRCHING* sentence in Jersey was carried out in 1966.
*BIRCHING* was abandoned as a policy in 1969 but lingered on the statute
books. Obsolete references to corporal punishment were removed from
remaining statutes by the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions)
(No. 2) (Jersey) Law 2007.

Formal floggings — those ordered by the ex-judicial authority of the
captain or court martial — were administered ceremonially on deck, the
crew being summoned to "witness punishment" and the prisoner being
brought forward by marines with fixed bayonets. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birching>

RESUME TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE DIALOG: "Why should you, in relation to what
things are mine and not yours, then dictate what ought to be on my mind?

Such rubbish as YOU CALL IT because of your abject ignorance which you
make despite the absolute command given under SECTION VIII of the
Letters Patent to be "obedient, aiding and assisting", can earn you a
criminal charge of TREASON and 25 years imprisonment (if I wish to
pursue that matter against you), as a contempt of your life and business towards the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION of
the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.

Why did you celebrate Christmas with a lunch on this 14 DECEMBER, 2016
when are you given to such hypocrisy and depravity of being with no
claim that you can make of Jesus Christ as you are a hypocrite and a
godless liar?

Stick to croissants and coffee--but leave the things which are mine to
my concern."

DOLF: “Who was it who wrote those ignorant comments in relation to my attendance here yesterday?”

TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “I want you to leave my business now or I will
call the police.”

[Showed a contemptuous disdain by a backhanded flicking refuse away
gesture towards these documents as if it was sh@t]

DOLF (paraphrase): “That is fine by me.

Because whether it is yourself, POLLYANNAR BIG PICTURE PHOTOGRAPHER or
REDD CATT CAFE, I will neither keep the company with fascist whores nor
to transact any business with those who come here to this country so as
to show such disrespect for the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES of our COMMONWEALTH.

You cannot thereby claim any piety, specially Christian identity (but
not limited to), your house is now desolate and anyone who does business
with you will now similarly lose their prospect of eternity.”

CHORUS OF PATRONS @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “Out!”

DOLF: “Go back to where you came from."

DATE OF SERVICE @ 1345 HOURS ON 29 DECEMBER 2016 OF COMPLAINT AS TO
INFERRED RACIAL HATRED BY PUBLIC EXCORIATION DIRECTED AS ANTI-SEMITISM
(#509 - YAHAD as JEWISH / CHRISTIANS) AND AGAINST DUTCH HERITAGE AND
THEIR FORTHRIGHT MANNER OF SPEECH BEING IMPLICIT TO CULTURAL IDENTITY
AGAINST JINGOISM CAROL @ TRIPLE FFF (#666) CAFE: "In Australia, a lieutenant-governor is a standing appointment for a deputy governor of a
state, who acts in place of the governor if the governor is unable,
unavailable or unwilling to act.

In Victoria, there is a lieutenant-governor and an administrator. The
Chief Justice of Victoria is ex officio the administrator, unless he or
she is the lieutenant-governor, in which case, the next most senior
judge is the administrator. The lieutenant-governor takes on the responsibilities of the governor when that post is vacant or when the
governor is out of the State or unable to act. The administrator takes
on those duties if both the governor and lieutenant-governor are not
able to act for the above reasons.

The lieutenant-governor is appointed by the governor on the advice of
the Premier of Victoria. Appointment as lieutenant-governor of itself
confers no powers or functions. If there is no governor or if the
governor is unavailable to act for a substantial period, the lieutenant-governor assumes office as administrator and exercises all
the powers and functions of a governor. If expecting to be unavailable
for a short period only, the governor with the consent of the premier,
usually commissions the lieutenant-governor to act as deputy governor, performing some or all of the powers and functions of the governor.

Marilyn Warren, the CHIEF JUSTICE OF VICTORIA (ie. in 1934 the *CHIEF* *JUSTICE* had *FASCIST* *AFFILIATIONS*), is the current lieutenant-governor.

As of 28 MARCH 2014, the Commonwealth deputies of the Governor-General
are Dame MARIE BASHIR AD CVO and ALEX CHERNOV AC QC. Further deputies
are appointed to exercise narrow powers, such as convening executive
meetings, opening parliament and swearing in new politicians.

There is no lieutenant-governor.

State governors hold a dormant commission to act as Administrator of the Commonwealth should the governor-general die, resign, or be absent
overseas or on leave. By convention, the longest-serving state governor
acts as administrator.

Presently, the longest-serving state governor is ALEX CHERNOV, who has
been Governor of Victoria since 8 APRIL 2011. The second longest-serving
state governor is PAUL DE JERSEY, who has been Governor of Queensland
since 29 JULY 2014.

On 1 August 2015, PAUL DE JERSEY assumed the administration of the
Government of the Commonwealth of Australia."

TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE @ 1213 HOURS: “You might like to visit the police station as we have reported you and I will take out an intervention
order against you if you persist in this manner.”

DOLF: “Since my actions and statements @ 0813 HOURS of this day have
been entirely in compliance with NATURE, LAW, ORDER and the JUSTICE of
this LAND as SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES which are defined by a Natural /
Common Law statement as to the existence of an egalitarian right and
that was in accord with such mathematical theoretical noumenon as
Intellectual Property of mine, and with specific regard to the computed CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING of #287 given as:

    #87 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 JUNE 2023 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1] /
    #287 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 0813 HOURS as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20,
#1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios (G316): 1) necessary; 1a) what one can
not do without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or
friendship; 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY*
*BE* *DONE*

As that which was required as action of mindful compliance given by you
in the circumstances AS MY LAWFUL demand granted in the prudent and
reasonable exercise of MY PREROGATIVE AS AUTHORITY made in regard to a submission given to SECTION VIII of the Letters Patent as defining the
AUTONOMY OF WILL being the MATERIA PRIMA of the SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLES encapsulated within the LETTERS PATENT to the Federation of the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901.

Should your improper, impertinent, unrepentant and bellicose as
threatening public conduct such as this statement: “I will take out an intervention order against you if you persist in this manner” continue.

I will recommend to the magistrate that a charge of TREASON pursuant to
Section 9A of the Crimes Act (1958) Victoria be brought against you and
that all the necessary documents relative to any successful prosecution
to the charge (as referenced here) have been already served on you.

I will bring your fascist conduct therefore into a proper mindfulness of contrition and a duty before the law.

Do you understand that?”

DESPITE A SUMMARY OF THE INITIATING SITUATION WITH CAROL @ TRIPLE F
(#666) CAFE OCCURRING ON 15 DECEMBER 2016 OF A BIGOTED ANTI-SEMITISM AND PREJUDICE TOWARDS AN IMPLICIT AND PROUD DUTCH IDENTITY BY JINGOISTIC
ICONOCLASM AGAINST QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AS FIRST PRINCIPLES
TO ANY JUSTIFIED EXISTENCE WITHIN STATES OF THE COMMONWEALTH WAS MADE ON
23 DECEMBER 2016.

I was on 2 JANUARY, 2017 served with an APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR AN INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016 so
as present myself by 0930 HOURS on 11 JANUARY, 2017 before the Sale Magistrate's Court in the determination of the matter and any DECISION
to make a final determination is the issuing of a Personal Safety
Intervention Order.

The material details of that Application are as follows: "The RESPONDENT
is a customer at my cafe, [whom] I have known of the RESPONDENT for
[more than] 2 months. On 23 DECEMBER 2016 the RESPONDENT came into my
cafe to deliver me a copy of an indictment he said [that] he was
[lawfully] up[on] me. The RESPONDENT became enraged when I told him to
leave the premises and threw his papers in the bin. I was actually
serving elderly customers at the time and they were very upset as were
staff.

On 22 DECEMBER 2016 when I was on my way to an appointment, the
RESPONDENT yelled abuse at me on the street, the RESPONDENT has done the
same before and has left a couple of ranting messages on my business
page on Facebook.

I think the RESPONDENT will continue these behaviours as I have looked
into his Facebook [page] and Googled him, [and found in my view that] he
is a religious fanatic.

I reported the first incident [occurring on 15 DECEMBER, 2016] to [the]
police.

I don't wish to engage in mediation as the RESPONDENT is very volatile
in his anger and for his religious beliefs, the RESPONDENT me.

I require an order as the RESPONDENT has entered my place of work twice,
the RESPONDENT is scaring my staff, my customers and myself. Even
approaching me [with]in the street.

I feel the RESPONDENT will persist until he feels he is proven right, it
is religious based.

THE POLICE REFERRED ME TO THE COURT [SO AS] TO MAKE THIS APPLICATION."

WE NOTED THAT THE MAGISTRATE BEING LIKELY OF AN IRISH DECENT / CATHOLIC
BELIEF IN GRANTING OF AN INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER AS CASE
NUMBER G13559325 UPON 11 APRIL 2017, THAT SUCH JUDICIAL ACTION UNUSUALLY DOVETAILED WITH BOTH THE DATE OF A PAPAL BULL *MISERICORDIAE* *VULTUS*
FOR INDICTION OF THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: #449 -
13 MARCH 2015 / DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015 - MARKING
RENEWAL OF THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS: SOLDIERS OF CHRIST'S RESURRECTION) AND
ITS EVENT OCCURRING AFTER ITS CONCLUSION AS DURATION FROM #355 - 8
DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of the Immaculate Conception) to #355 - 20 NOVEMBER
2016.

WHICH ARE ENTIRELY ESTABLISHED UPON NON-JUSTICIABLE GROUNDS AS BEING ANTI-SEMITIC AND IMPLICITLY A RACIALISM DIRECTED AGAINST A FORTHRIGHT CHARACTERISTIC OF DUTCH CULTURAL IDENTITY AS THEN SLANDER SWORN BY OATH
AND A CONTEMPT AGAINST THE ONTIC FIRST PRINCIPLES TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT AS THEN AN UNEQUIVOCAL CRITERIA FOR EXISTENCE WITHIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH, THEREBY GIVING CAUSE FOR THE REASONABLE
ACCUSATION THAT THE MAGISTRATE BEING LIKELY OF AN IRISH DECENT /
CATHOLIC BELIEF AND BY NATURE COULD BE INFERRED WAS ADVANCING AN IRISH REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST / WORLD WAR ONE 2018 HIJACKING SEDITIOUS /
TREASONOUS COMMON CAUSE.

#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW APPEAL DERIVED FROM THE BIBLICAL ACCOUNT
WHICH IS AGAINST THE UNIQUE INTERSECTION WITHIN NOUMENON AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The #364 - QUESTION of #430 - LAW appeal derived from the Biblical
account which is against the unique intersection within NOUMENON as INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY related to the technologizing of QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 given the earlier date 21 AUGUST
1770 then relates to CAPTAIN COOK's diary entry of DUTCH PRIOR DISCOVERY
and POSSESSION having a LEGAL PRECEDENT applicable to PAPAL BULL dated 1493.



<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.8.21&prototype:torah&idea:303,328,364,430>

.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 55 [DATE: 2023.8.21, SUPER: #328
/ #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on
what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - ENDEAVOUR
(WU), EGO: #430 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs; I-Ching: H22 -
Elegance, Grace, Adorning, Luxuriance; Tetra: 54 - UNITY (K'UN)]

The date 13 FEBRUARY 962 was a relevant event involving a signing of the DIPLOMA OTTONIANUM (also called the PACTUM OTTONIANUM, PRIVILEGIUM
OTTONIANUM or simply OTTONIANUM) as an agreement between POPE JOHN XII
and OTTO I, King of Germany and Italy. It confirmed the earlier DONATION
OF PEPIN dated 756, granting control of the Papal States to the Popes, regularizing Papal elections, and clarifying the relationship between
the Popes AND the Holy Roman EMPERORS.



<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.2.13&prototype:heteros&idea:297,352,430,460>

.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 9, col: 3, nous: 59 [DATE: 2023.2.13, SUPER: #352
/ #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG), EGO:
#460 / #59 - A Sensible Guide, Hold Fast To Reason; I-Ching: H42 -
Increase, Augmenting; Tetra: 13 - INCREASE (TSENG)]

Whereas the LATERAN TREATY (Italian: PATTI LATERANENSI; Latin: PACTA LATERANENSIA) were later agreements signed on 11 FEBRUARY 1929 and
effective 7 JUNE 1929, made between the Kingdom of Italy under KING
VICTOR EMMANUEL III of Italy and the HOLY SEE under POPE PIUS XI to
settle the long-standing Roman Question.

It therefore has a consequence upon PAPAL BULL *INTER* *CAETERA* issued
by POPE ALEXANDER VI on 4 MAY 1493, those earlier relating to the
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR with the last *VOX* *IN* *EXCELSO* dated 22 MARCH 1312
and the more recent PAPAL BULL *MISERICORDIAE* *VULTUS* for INDICTION OF
THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: #449 - 13 MARCH 2015 /
DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015) occurring from #355 - 8
DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of the Immaculate Conception) to #355 - 20 NOVEMBER
2016.

To thereby substantiate a reasonable claim of an endemic IRISH CATHOLIC
basis for RACIAL / RELIGIOUS HATRED, WAR CRIMES and TREASON.

Despite its celebrated acknowledgement of the need to reject *TERRA*
*NULLIUS* as the legal foundation of Australia, in Mabo v Queensland (No
2) [1992] HCA 23; (1992) 175 CLR 1 (‘Mabo’) the Australian High Court
used a sleight-of-hand to tackle this paradox. First, native title was
defined as a fragile and incomplete title. Rather than recognising and
creating a robust legal version of the interests and responsibilities
created by customary law to authorise the complex relationships among
people and between people and their country (native title), the High
Court constructed native title as a highly circumscribed recognition
space – a limited set of artefacts of customary law and aboriginal title
that the British (and subsequently Australian) common law was able and
obliged to recognise as ‘property’. Having reduced the robust and
ancient jurisdictions of the Dreaming to the fragility of ‘native
title’, the High Court introduced a slippery notion of ‘co-existence’.

This notion was not an acknowledgement of the co-existence of Indigenous
and non-Indigenous interests in particular places, but an abstract conceptualisation of legal interests in property that could exist
together. It was this abstract conceptualisation which was used to
address the persistent presence of Aboriginal people in cultural
landscapes that were now possessed by new owners whose title was
predicated on the imaginary of *TERRA* *NULLIUS* [as a SLANDER against
Dutch first discovery and possession acknowledged by COOK on 21 AUGUST
1770 in compliance with the legal precedent PAPAL BULL INTER CAETERA
issued by POPE ALEXANDER VI on 4 MAY 1493 and VAN DIEMAN'S LAND named
after a DUTCH GOVERNOR GENERAL and therefore subject to rule of law; cf: Macquarie Law Journal 49, 2006]

The DUTCH SOVEREIGN during a STATE VISIT on 2 NOVEMBER 2016, stated:
"During this state visit, we will be celebrating the close bonds our
countries have forged over the centuries. But perhaps even more
important are the opportunities we see ahead of us. The Kingdom of the Netherlands attaches great value to our close partnership with Australia because we believe that, as like-minded nations, we stand stronger
together. Together we can find better answers to the challenges of our time.

...

Today, at a time when the international legal order is under pressure,
it is all the more important that we stand together to defend its
principles. Australia and the Netherlands are natural allies as
promoters of peace, justice and development, and we often work side by
side. Take our partnership a few years ago in Uruzgan in Afghanistan.
And our current efforts in the fight against terrorism in Syria and Iraq.

You have also given personal expression to the bond between our
countries. You were in Eindhoven on that dark day in JULY 2014, when the
first flights arrived carrying the remains of the victims of the downing
of MH17. For my wife and me, commemorating the Australian victims this
morning at the memorial was a very moving experience. We greatly
appreciate Australia's outstanding cooperation in the investigation of
the full facts, so that those responsible can be called to account, and
justice can be done.

...

Just as, for us, Australia is a window onto the Asia-Pacific region, we
want to be your window onto Europe.

As I said, Eendracht - Concord - was the name of the ship in which Dirk
Hartog sailed to Australia in 1616 [and such presence at Cape
Inscription, Shark Bay, Western Australia is recorded on a pewter dish
which translates as: 'arrived here on 25 OCTOBER 1616']. And today, 400
years later, 'concord' is a fitting flag for us to sail under as we go
forward into the future.

Thank you for the warmth and friendship you always show us in Australia."


<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartog_Plate>

WILLEM DE VLAMINGH found the 1616 DIRK HARTOG pewter plate at Cape
Inscription, Shark Bay on 4 FEBRUARY 1697. Stress from flattening dinner
bowls to create the plates predisposed them to corrode and crack. The
HARTOG text was copied and a new inscription recording the date of the discovery by DE VLAMINGH and his crew was stamped with letter punches
into the metal. The recovered HARTOG plate was taken to Batavia in Java
and is exhibited at the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. The DE VLAMINGH plate
was attached to a wooden post with rectangular iron-planking nails. As
the iron corroded the run-off caused differential corrosion reactions
that help form the complex patina. The fallen plate was discovered by
HAMELIN in 1801 and attached to a new post. It was recovered by LOUIS DE FREYCINET in 1818 and eventually taken to Paris where it remained until
given by the French people to the Australian government after World War II.

We provide herewith a document associated to our TRIPARTITE NUMBER
theoretical NOUMENON / GODHEAD as my sole INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relevant
to GNOSIS EX MACHINA as a nomenclature for consciousness instantiation
and the neuraxis (ie. From Ancient Greek νεῦρον (neûron) [TELOS: #675 - *CAPABLE*; MALE: #309; FEME: #270; ONTIC: #370; DEME: #525] + άξονας (áxonas) [TELOS: #382 - *BIND*; MALE: #209; FEME: #220, ONTIC: #583,
DEME: #544] as an axis that forms part of the interchange basis of
situational grounding for action) possibility for obtaining exclusive
PATENTS to intelligent books and knowledge spheres as requisite for a
knowledge / sapient economy: "DEVISING THE IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AND HYPOTHESIS ON ONTIC VARIANCE BY
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION WITHOUT IDEOLOGICAL OR PARTISAN IMPETUS"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Letters%20Patent%20Variance.pdf>

ON THAT BASIS CAROL @ TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE's APPLICATION AND SUMMONS FOR
AN INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30 DECEMBER 2016
OUGHT TO HAVE NO LOCUS STANDI WITHIN ANY COURT AS JURISDICTION WITHIN
THE COMMONWEALTH SINCE IT IS AN ICONOCLASM AGAINST FIRST PRINCIPLES
being the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY which as metakosemeo is
constitutionally the product of a CAESAROPAPISM intrinsic to QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT and the ontology of the human being (ie.
homosapiens) reflecting IMAGO DEI.

I believe the MAGISTRATE was of an IRISH DECENT and by NATURE would be advancing an IRISH REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST / WORLD WAR ONE 2018 HIJACKING
SEDITIOUS / TREASONOUS COMMON CAUSE in their determinations and
therefore ought to have RECUSED THEMSELVES within the APPLICATION AND
SUMMONS FOR AN INTERVENTION ORDER in CASE NUMBER: G13559325 dated 30
DECEMBER 2016 and in hearing matters subsequent as especially CASE
NUMBER: H12143475 lodged upon 31 JULY 2017 which included the following
item as grounds:

#3: ON 31.7.2017 AT 10AM [THE RESPONDENT] SHOWED ME A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE
MARION STATUE WITH[IN] THE PARK OPPOSITE WEARING A BALACLAVA AS TO
CONVEY OUR MUTUAL UNDERSTAND[ING] OF IT['S] PLACEMENT AS *AN* *ATTEMPT*
[*TO*] *SUBVERT* *OUR* *AUSTRALIAN* *HISTORY* *WHICH* *IS* *ABSENT* *OF* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *IMPOSITIONS* *UPON* *OUR* *BOER* / *ANZAC*
*TRADITION* *BY* *A* *SUBSTITUTED* *ETHIC*.

THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT GROUNDS WITHIN A RECIPROCATED APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION ORDERS AS CASE NUMBER H13214018 DATED 22 NOVEMBER 2017
WHICH ARE EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO MY APPLICATION FOR ORDERS MADE OF 31 JULY
2017 AND CLEARLY DESIGNED TO FRUSTRATE THEM FOR THE MAGISTRATE of an
IRISH DECENT TO THEN ENJOIN THEM TO THE HEARING OF MY APPLICATION:

#1 - I have known the RESPONDENT for approximately 2 years and 3 months,
the RESPONDENT is my neighbour, we live in an apartment block / set of
units.

#2 - The most recent incident occurred on 22 NOVEMBER 2017 I was at No
#n speaking with the resident when the RESPONDENT pulled into the
driveway blocking the exit and started photographing me and filming me.

NOTE: No it was the phallic graffiti which the APPLICANT had left within
my parking space that I had tried to photograph (ie. functionally
difficult to do with a new model iPhone which required different
gestures given the absence of a home button) and remove the impediment
before then parking on my private property -- no photographs were ever
taken but a voice recording was instead obtained of the APPLICANT's
animus which the MAGISTRATE as by habitually perverse justice failed to consider

#3 - I approached him and told him to move his car and stop taking
pictures of me.

#4 - The RESPONDENT ignored me and continued to take photos.

#5 - Previously the RESPONDENT has harassed all of my family and friends
that visit me and are subject to racial taunts, their pictures being
taken and threatened to be published on the internet, and accuses them
of being NAZI sympathisers.

#6 - I believe the respondent will continue with this behaviour."



<https://www.news.com.au/national/courts-law/they-knew-ben-robertssmith-photo-resurfaces-exposing-chilling-detail-in-adf-coverup/news-story/7920848fbfd47c1f77d42adfa359112a>

We have to see whether the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR CROSS jewellery BEN ROBERTS
SMITH wore on 6 APRIL 2010 has any treasonous affinity with a CHRIST OF
THE RESURRECTION renewal on 11 APRIL 2015. Since the Russians used the
same META SCHEMA gambit contemporaneously with their Ukrainian military operation.

The IBAC NOTES DATED 20 JUNE 2023 poses the question: WAS CONSTRUCTION
OF THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES MAIN (RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) CATHEDRAL
FINALISED IN 2020 A META SCHEMA FOR DISASSOCIATION WITH NAZISM'S
PARADIGMATIC SOCIALIST MANIFESTO?

#2312 [#523 - milchâmâh (H4421): *BATTLE*, *WAR* (22 JUNE RESONANCE) /
#368 - shêm (H8034): *MEMORIAL*, *MONUMENT* (22 JUNE RESONANCE)] /
#1943 [#753 - sâmach (H8055): *TO* *REJOICE* *RELIGIOUSLY* (22 JUNE
RESONANCE) / #485 - oikodomḗ (G3619): *THE* *ACT* *OF* *BUILDING*; DATE
OF INVASION 24 FEBRUARY 2022 + #485 *DAYS* = 24 JUNE 2023] =
metaschēmatízō (G3345): {UMBRA: #2312 % #41 = #16} 1) *TO* *CHANGE*
*THE* *FIGURE* *OF*, *TO* *TRANSFORM* made in conjunction with the
VATICAN CITY-STATE (#291, #297, #333) to absolve themselves of any
paradigmatic association given the Nazism socialist faith which is unequivocally expressed by the IDEA @328 as pathological characteristic
within the TABLE TALK as its manifesto.

By the ingenuity of our publicly accessible IBAC Notes dated 20 JUNE
2023 within our own LEGAL MATTERS we had effected an appropriate
intervention by the happenstance in rendering a #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY mediation assistance to the RUSSIANS 🇷🇺 and their conflict with fascist identity (ie. #33 ASSOCIATION WITH REICH CONCORDAT OF 20
JULY 1933) and BIPARTITE NUMBER PARADIGM as an action, although devised
some 7 years ago, then intersecting on #33 ---> #484 TH DAY OF CONFLICT
ON 23 JUNE 2023 ---> #487 TH DAY OF CONFLICT ON 26 JUNE 2023 AS RETURN
TO *NOUS* #33 and transitioning them to a TRIPARTITE NUMBER / NEURAL
LINGUISTIC foundation we have thereby differentiated such from IRISH
CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 deploying the
same METASCHEMA OF EVASION as now a CASE STUDY of substantiation within
any PRIMA FACIE MODUS OPERANDI CLAIM of TREASON:

"*TRANSFORMING*-G3345 THEMSELVES INTO THE APOSTLES OF #1480 [#329 -
éthnos (G1484): *TROOP*, *NATION*, *SAME* *NATURE* *OR* *GENUS* / #265 - apología (G627): *REASONED* *STATEMENT* *OR* *ARGUMENT*] / #2020 [#384 - sálpinx (G4536): *TRUMPET* / #238 - zâkar (H2142): *MAKE* *A*
*MEMORIAL*, *KEEP* *IN* *REMEMBRANCE*] - *CHRIST*.

Αn usage of the CHI-RHO (*Α* - *Ω* / *ω*) SYMBOL associated with the consecration on 14 JUNE 2020 to the Main Cathedral of the Russian Armed
Forces which is a lavish Russian Patriarchal cathedral in honour of the RESURRECTION OF CHRIST and "dedicated to the 75th anniversary of victory
in the Great Patriotic War (22 JUNE 1941), as well as the military feats
of the Russian people in all wars", built in the Patriot Park in the Odintsovsky District, Moscow Oblast.

Gives a nuance to this META SCHEMA OF EVASION ASSOCIATED WITH THE
RESURRECTION OF #2020 - CHRIST subterfuge by the MAIN CATHEDRAL OF THE
RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES which was consecrated using the CHI-RHO (*Α* - *Ω*
/ *ω*) SYMBOL symbol that was by CONCORDAT 20 July 1933 married to
nazism is that PUTIN's military operation within UKRAINE which was
justified by CONCERN ABOUT NAZI IDENTITY (ie. "rewrite history and
glorify fascists" [Wikileaks document ID: 08MOSCOW2656_a, dated 1
FEBRUARY 2008]) has by being an action copyright attributed to Ministry
of Defence of the Russian Federation (Mil.ru) is a #561 - *DESECRATION*
in dishonouring the RUSSIAN war dead.

    #245 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 JUNE 2023 / PRIGOZHIN's *COUP* ON MOSCOW as [#200, #40, #5] /
#251 - REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM OF 5 JULY 1942 AS TABLE TALK as [#6, #200,
#40, #5] = rimmâh (H7415): {UMBRA: #245 % #41 = #40} 1) *MAGGOT*, worm
(as cause and sign of decay);

#851 = ЛИЧИНКА (maggot: a whimsy or fancy)

{@7: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#233); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#203)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.6.23&idea:112,203,233,294,851&lexicon:G2018,G3852,H82,H696,G2316,G3620,H3318,H6919>

    #233 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #80, #5, #50,
#5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphérō (G2018): {UMBRA: #1500 % #41 =
#24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 1a) *USED* *OF* *ACCUSERS*; 2)
*TO* *LAY* *UPON*, *TO* *INFLICT*; 3) to bring upon, i.e. in addition,
to add, increase; 4) to put upon, cast upon, impose;

    #233 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 24 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #1, #100, #1,
#3, #3, #5, #30, #9, #1] = parangelía (G3852): {UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29}
1) announcement, a proclaiming or giving a message to; 2) *A* *CHARGE*,
*A* *COMMAND*;

#203 as [#1, #2, #200] = ʼâbar (H82): {UMBRA: #203 % #41 = #39} 1)
(Hiphil) to *FLY* (to move wings);

#203 as [#1, #200, #2] = ʼôreb (H696): {UMBRA: #203 % #41 = #39} 1) ambuscade, hiding place; 2) *TREACHERY*, *DECEIT* (fig.);


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)