• -- HE HAS COME UPON EARTH (2/2)

    From dolf@21:1/5 to dolf on Fri Jan 17 15:15:36 2020
    [continued from previous message]

       @6: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#240); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#76),
       Male: #240; Feme: #76
    } // #238 <-- #237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* + @1 - SELF ENTITLEMENT

    WE ARE WITH SUCH AVENUE OF #364 - ENQUIRY AS THE METHODOLOGY FOR
    RESOLVING #312 - CONTRADICTION BEING A PROPENSITY AGAINST THE @21 -
    AUTONOMY {LIABILITY PRINCIPLE} THEN CAPABLE TO RE-INCLUDE {ie. similarly
    the GREEK STOICHEION redaction to #24 elements} THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE 33
    ELEMENT STOICHEION {ie. by consecutive milesian ordinals} WITHIN THE
    @MEMEBRAIN as then sufficient to resolve the ARABIC SCRIPT / *ABJAD*
    NUMBERS *DICHOTOMY* of TWI-TONGUED / JANUS DECEPTION as precipitous (ie. *HASTY*; *RASH*; *QUICK*; *SUDDEN* / *THE* *BRINK* *OF* *A* *DANGEROUS* *SITUATION*) impetus given by a VOCALISATION which is *NOT* *RELATED*
    *TO* *ANY* *SPECIFIC* *DOGMA*, but due entirely to the *ABJAD* NUMBERS
    being used for assigning numerical values to Arabic words in purposes of numerology and then having an alternative *ABJAD* order as canonical juxtaposition being applied as CIRCUMSCRIBING: 



    ORIGINAL ABJAD ORDER:

    #60    س    sīn    s 


    #90    ص    ṣād    ṣ 


    #300    ش    shīn    sh 


    #800    ض    ḍād    ḍ 


    #900    ظ    ẓāʾ    ẓ 


    #1000    غ    ghayn    gh 




    ALTERNATIVE ABJAD ORDER: 


    #60    ص    ṣād    ṣ 


    #90    ض    ḍād    ḍ 


    #300    س    sīn    s 


    #800    ظ    ẓāʾ    ẓ 


    #900    غ    ghayn    gh 


    #1000    ش    shīn    sh 




    THUS WE HAVE A MECHANISM OF COMPLIANCE TO DETERMINE A SQUARENESS BETWEEN
    WORD AND DEED WHICH OTHERWISE CANNOT EVER BE GUARANTEED.

    EXCERPT FROM: "ROMAN CATHOLIC PONTIFICAL CLAIMS OF HUMANITY FROM A
    BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVE IS DENIED ANY COMMON ASSOCIATION TO #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS EXCLUSIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
    RIGHT CLAIM GIVEN A CULTURE OF HATRED WHICH IS THE EMBODIMENT OF THEIR EXISTENCE MADE AGAINST ANTHROPOLOGY (IMAGO DEI) AS A PRETENSE TO PIETY"
    date 21 to 24 December 2019

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/On%20Human%20Dignity.pdf>

    Initial Post: 17 January 2020

    On 11/1/20 10:30 am, dolf wrote:
    .jackNote@zen: 3, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 42 [DATE: 2020.10.31, TIME:
    14:30 hrs, SUPER: #462 / #61 - Virtuous Humility at Using 'Beneath';
    I-Ching: H64 - Ferrying Incomplete, Before Completion, Not Yet
    Fording, Not yet completed; Tetra: 78 - ON THE VERGE (CHIANG), EGO:
    #399 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications; I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation; Tetra: 52 -
    MEASURE (TU)]
    I just had a fellow named ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI engaging within
    NAZI SLANDER upon Facebook ... I'm presuming that was the ITALIAN
    author of "L' OTTAVO SIGILLO: - PRIMA PARTE (The Eighth Seal: first
    part) as he immediately BLOCKED me (fortunately I had retained a copy
    of the post as my intellectual property over which he ought not have
    any control) as an attempt to preserve his fractured reputation due to
    an exacting category of understanding @215 conveyed by his speech as
    *CHANCE* evidence of his fascist identity: "Is there randomness, the so-called "chance"? And when we speak of a case, do we refer to a
    unique idea or do heterogeneous conceptions exist?

    The concept of chance has an undisputed authoritativeness: not only do
    we use it customarily, but it constitutes a principle which all
    scientific disciplines, without any exception, and most of all
    biology, make use of - sometimes even obsessively. But is it possible
    to concretely found randomness? Or does the concept of chance denote something non-existent?

    This text is probably the most comprehensive and detailed monographic
    study ever carried out in this regard. And it is defined as
    monographic, but only formally it is: since every exegesis of
    randomness immediately transcends its theoretical frontier. In fact,
    the case is an ubiquitous notion that is re-proposed with a very high frequency in every context and that is considered an indisputable and pertinent hermeneutic of events, of the origin of life, of the
    evolution of the cosmos, and is even the most popular narrative
    illustration of the vicissitudes everyday life experienced by all of
    us. But was it true glory, or is it boasted credit? Would it be
    possible to renounce the concept of chance, or is it essential? What
    do you do, what is this strange but omnipresent, subtle but very
    powerful concept for?" [<https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40698114-l-ottavo-sigillo>]

    I QUESTION WHETHER ITALY IS ACTUALLY A *DEMOCRACY* (such is a
    TRINOMIAL #71 - WORLDVIEW and not a BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS
    perspective) SINCE THEY TREAT ALL THEIR LEADERS with disrespect (ie.
    Benito Mussolini being an exemplar of ITALIAN STUBBORN WILL) but have
    they ever formerly recanted of fascism as a BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS
    CHRIST MURDEROUS DOGMA?

    I've done a GOOGLE SEARCH and beyond a "CONTINUING DISSATISFACTION
    WITH ITS POLITICAL LEADERS" I cannot find any evidence that the
    ITALIAN STATE has ever formerly recanted of their fascism as a
    BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS being a CHRIST MURDEROUS DOGMA and in my
    view a *NORTH* *KOREAN* *PEACE* *ACCORD* to a war which began on 25
    June 1950 would be a more certain prospect.

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Fascism>

    ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI (FACEBOOK): Yeah, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE:
    YING (#41); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#66)}

    because when you get your job pretending that being the prince of the
    British crown had no part in securing it, {@2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
    (#95); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#134)}

    and when you get a huge loan pretending that being the prince of the
    British crown had no part in securing it, {@3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES:
    NAN (#174); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR
    A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

    you're not commercializing the British crown: {@4: Sup: 54 - UNITY:
    K'UN (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 67 - DARKENING:
    HUI (#282)}

    you're getting a job! {@5: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#234); Ego: 5 -
    KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#287)}

    MALE: @228 = #228 as [#5, #100, #3, #70, #50] = érgon (G2041): {UMBRA:
    #54 as #228 % #41 = #23} 1) *BUSINESS*, *EMPLOYMENT*, *THAT* *WHICH*
    *ANY *ONE* *IS* *OCCUPIED*; 1a) that which one undertakes to do,
    enterprise, undertaking; 2) any product whatever, any thing
    accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind; 3) an act, deed, thing
    done: the idea of working is emphasised in opp. to that which is less
    than work;

    FEME: @215 = #215: "BUT IT IS THANKS TO THOSE ATTRIBUTES THAT ARE
    PECULIAR TO OUR RACE AND WHICH HAVE BEEN PRESERVED IN LOWER SAXONY
    THAT WE HAVE BEEN ABLE HARMONIOUSLY TO ABSORB EXTRANEOUS CHARACTERISTICS—FOR WE POSSESS ONE FACULTY WHICH EMBRACES ALL THE
    OTHERS, AND THAT IS,

    THE IMPERIAL OUTLOOK:

    <https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

    THE POWER TO REASON AND TO BUILD DISPASSIONATELY." [ADOLF HITLER's
    TABLE TALK IDEA @215, 12 MAY 1942]

    ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #443 as [#2, #1, #400, #600] = bôwʼ (H935):
    {UMBRA: #6 as #9 % #41 = #9} 1) to go in, enter, come, go, come in;
    1a) (Qal); 1a1) to enter, come in; 1a2) to come; i) to come with; ii)
    to come upon, fall or light upon, attack (enemy); iii) to come to
    pass; 1a3) to attain to; 1a4) to be enumerated; 1a5) to go; 1b)
    (Hiphil); 1b1) to lead in; 1b2) to carry in; 1b3) to bring in, cause
    to come in, gather, cause to come, bring near, bring against, bring
    upon; 1b4) to bring to pass; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be brought, brought
    in; 1c2) to be introduced, be put;

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/1ST%20Responders%2011%20September%202001.png>


    No you are actually wrong on that, since if you SUM the left column
    [28, 50, 11, 75, 6, 45, 25, 67, 62] of that BINOMIAL / TRINOMIAL interoperability as BRITISH IMPERIAL @71 - WORLDVIEW, one ought note
    that the resultant ONTIC value @215 has a comment from *HITLER* whom similarly deployed the ROMAN BINOMIAL @1 / @5 STASIS IMPERIAL OUTLOOK.

    [28, {@1: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28)}

    50, {@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#106); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
    WASTING: T'ANG (#78)}

    11, {@3: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#114); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A
    (#89)}

    75, {@4: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#116); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH
    (#164)}

    6, {@5: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#124); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#170)}

    45, {@6: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING
    {%29}); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
    OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

    25, {@7: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#255); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION:
    CHENG (#240)}

    67, {@8: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#319); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI
    (#307)}

    62] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#364); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#369)}

    MALE: @177 = #177

    FEME: @215 = #215

    ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #392

    By the sounds of things you are on the wrong side of history (an
    important consideration given the recent WWI centennial 2018)


    <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/RSL%20DISLOYALTY%2020191226.pdf>

    Initial Post: 11 January 2020




    On 7/1/20 1:43 am, fool for Christ wrote:
    "He has come upon earth, He Who in the beginning created us from
    earth and
    breathed His Divine breath into us; He has come Who "giveth to all
    life,
    and breath, and all things" (Acts 17:25); He has come, He Who by a
    single
    word called all things visible and invisible from non-existence into existence, Who by a word called into being birds, fishes, quadrupeds, insects, and all creatures, existing under His almighty providence and care; He has come."

    St. John of Kronstadt, On the Nativity of Christ.

    "For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the
    government
    will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful,

    Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.


    --


    YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

    SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS {#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#
    390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

    Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

    <http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

    SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

    Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE (translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis
    titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

    It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial
    trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

    The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS]
    SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

    That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

    After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist, expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)