XPost: soc.culture.pacific-island, alt.culture.african, alt.fan.countries.ghana XPost: alt.politics.africa
FORMAL NOTICE OF COMPLAINT AGAINST ISRAEL FOLOU AND LACK OF
RESPONSIVENESS FROM SAM CHO AS MINISTER OF THE KENTHURST UNITING CHURCH
TO DUE A HAUGHTY ATTITUDE AS RACIAL HATRED
DATE: 17 APRIL 2019
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#338 / #375} / HETEROS {#358 / #385} / TORAH {#300
/ #356}
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:1,col:8,nous:54&lexicon:H1288>
.jackNote@zen: 3, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 54 [Date: 2019.4.17, Super: #338
/ #68 - Coinciding with Nature, Complying With Heaven; I-Ching: H14 -
Great Holdings, Great Possessions, Possession in great measure; Tetra:
38 - Fullness, Ego: #375 / #54 - Culturing Perspectives and Intuition;
I-Ching: H55 - Abundance, Abounding, Fullness; Tetra: 45 - Greatness]
Unfortunately the MINISTER (presumably SAM CHO <
kenthurstuniting@gmail.com>) to the KENTHURST UNITING CHURCH which
provides outreach services to Korean / Tongan immigrant communities so
as to accord societal and cultural integration, has not been at all
responsive (as to be entirely discourteous to fail to even acknowledge
them) to our numerous emails made at @ 2034 HOURS ON 14 APRIL 2019 as a
patient and dignified regard in relation to ISRAEL FOLAU'S PUBLIC
SLANDER BY THE #444 - MOCKING OF HOMOSEXUALS WHICH IN OUR PRUDENT VIEW
IS A CULTURAL PERVERSITY AS RETARDED PSYCHO-SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT DUE
ENTIRELY TO HIS HAVING SOLD HIS SOUL TO THE DEVIL BY NARCISSISTIC
SELF-BESTOWAL OF AN IMPIETY AS ANY NOTION OF REDEMPTION BEING IMPLICITLY NEO-NAZISM:
#444 as [#30, #300, #8, #6, #100] = sechowq (H7814): {UMBRA: #8 as #414
% #41 = #4} 1) *LAUGHTER*, *LAUGHING* *STOCK*, *MOCKING*, *DERISION*;
1a) laughter; 1a1) joyful; 1a2) hollow; 1b) derision (of object); 1c)
*SPORT*;
In contrast, I have provided a substantiation of a HUMANIST (DAOist /
TORAH / CHRISTIAN) UNIVERSALIST RELIGIOUS BELIEF by means of a trinomial metastasised reality that is a stable consciousness aligned with a
static hypostasises which I have by prudent conditioning attained to as transcendence and neither SAM CHO / ISRAEL FOLAU do not since they
exhibit a failure to syncretised factuality into their own experience as
a public claim by ISRAEL FOLAU to being delusional since there is
conveyed a stubborn refusal to inform one’s self (do they ever consult a dictionary if they encounter a new word for instance) is more properly a psychosis ...
We'd hoped that although your values don't accord with the nation's
principles associated with our BOER / ANZAC heritage that you would at
least refrain from bellicose (ie. warlike) conduct at this time of year.
@1 - RETENTION; @5 - CENTRE OF VALUE? {#111 - SUNDAY SACREDNESS / #666 -
*YOU* *AREN'T* *CHRISTIAN* *AT* *ALL*}; #65 - *SOLDIER*; #175 - *MARRIAGE*.
My guess is that your ANZAC tradition doesn’t adhere to first principles
such as #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL being reality is similarly only propagandised and “the nurse needs to come to take you back to your room.”
“YE WORSHIP YE KNOW NOT WHAT: WE KNOW WHAT WE WORSHIP: FOR SALVATION IS
OF THE JEWS.” [John 4:22 (KJV)]
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)
#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESITNG NORM (COVET NOT)
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 -
CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT
Having sent a number of emails directly to that UNITING CHURCH RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF FAITH in the week prior to Easter your opportunity for any
further graces from ourselves will expire midnight 21 APRIL 2019 and our INTENTION THEREAFTER IS TO CUT THEM ALL OFF FROM ANY POSSIBILITY OF
REDEMPTION:
“BOAST NOT AGAINST THE BRANCHES. BUT IF THOU BOAST, THOU BEAREST NOT THE ROOT, BUT THE ROOT THEE.
THOU WILT SAY THEN, THE BRANCHES WERE BROKEN OFF, THAT I MIGHT BE
GRAFFED IN.
WELL; BECAUSE OF UNBELIEF THEY WERE BROKEN OFF, AND THOU STANDEST BY
FAITH. BE NOT HIGHMINDED, BUT FEAR:
FOR IF GOD SPARED NOT THE NATURAL BRANCHES, TAKE HEED LEST HE ALSO SPARE
NOT THEE.
BEHOLD THEREFORE THE GOODNESS AND SEVERITY OF GOD: ON THEM WHICH FELL, SEVERITY; BUT TOWARD THEE, GOODNESS, IF THOU CONTINUE IN HIS GOODNESS: OTHERWISE THOU ALSO SHALT BE CUT OFF.” [Romans 11:18-22 (KJV)]
Regrettably it will then be necessary to take legal action to enforce
our RIGHTS AND ENTITLEMENTS WITHIN A CONTINENT WHERE WE HAVE OVER A 400
YEAR HISTORY FROM 26 OCTOBER 1616 and in forcing you to respond to our
written submissions by the bestowing of a proper RESPECTFUL perspective
as ACCOUNTABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY at a convenient time against both
ISRAEL FOLAU and the UNITING CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA as a PUBLIC AUTHORITY PROVISIONING GOVERNMENT SERVICES in relation to his unrepentant public
slander due entirely to a delusional religious belief, breaches of our constitutional entitlement, a disrespect of our BOER / ANZAC heritage
and the prerogatives of our factual religious belief associated to a
sapient intellectual property and allied to an enlightened culture.
SEE ALSO: THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BREXIT AS SAPIENT ECONOMY
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Marriage%20of%20FREXIT%20and%20BREXIT%20as%20Sapient%20Economy%2020190415.pdf>
SEE ALSO: "ARE THE VEGAN #419 - PROTESTS AN ASYMMETRICAL GLOBALIST
MOVEMENT PROPAGANDISED BY INTEGRAL WORLD WHICH IS INTENTIONED ON
DESTABILISING SOVEREIGN NATIONS?"
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Reggie%20The%20Veggie.pdf>
SEE ALSO: “MELBOURNE FERTILITY CONTROL CLINIC” dated 11 to 13 April 2019
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Melbourne%20Fertility%20Control%20Clinic%2020190411.pdf>
SEE ALSO: "THE ADVENTURES OF W[H]ACK JOB (POTTY MOUTH GETS TOILET
TRAINING)" dated 11 April 2019
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Potty%20Mouth.pdf>
- dolf (email:
dolfboek@gmail.com)
Initial Post: 17 April 2019
----------
-- THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BREXIT AS SAPIENT ECONOMY
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 15 April, 2019
FRANCE24 (ENGLISH) @ 1814 HOURS ON 13 APRIL 2019: “COULD MACRON AND
BREXIT MAKE PARIS THE CAPITAL OF EUROPEAN TECH?
Shortly after his election in May 2017, President Macron said he wanted
France itself “to think and move like a start-up” – a vision of the country’s digital future that is gaining traction as Britain wrestles
with BREXIT.
French President Emmanuel Macron’s vow to make France a ‘start-up
nation’ amid the uncertainty over BREXITIS raising the question of
whether Paris could supplant London as the capital of European tech.
Since his election, Macron has wooed *TECHNOLOGY* entrepreneurs with a
string of initiatives in the form of lavish tax breaks, subsides, and
credits for research. In March 2018, he promised to invest €1.5 billion
into artificial intelligence research through 2022.
Some of these initiatives, in addition to Macron’s dynamism, have lured British tech companies who are looking to gain a foothold in Europe."
<
https://www.france24.com/en/20190413-france-paris-macron-brexit-tech-capital-european-station-f>
MARTIN DAVIES: “Time to stop BREXIT before more jobs, businesses and hardworking EU citizens abandon the U.K. for good.”
DOLF BOEK: “But only Britain has the means to define the Sovereign /
Autonomy dynamic which a sapient economy requires.
And their political opportunism are no different to Mr Macron’s in that
any viable political life requires a favourably motivated constituency otherwise how will they retain office.”
DAVID NICOL: “Time for the losers to accept democracy.”
STEPHAN GON: “David, it’s about economy this time, you reflect the
innate ignorance of the bulk of BREXITERS, now you go back reading more
lies from the side of that bus."
KURT SHUBERT: “Dolf any business relationship requires working with your partners & biggest customers. The best deal the UK can have and still
retain *X* amount of autonomy is to remain a part of the EU.”
DOLF BOEK: “Kurt, I have made a further statement given such incapacity
to comprehend that the microcosm as the trinomial metastasised
conception of state being sovereign / autonomy dynamic must be
understood before the binomial stasis of macroeconomic interoperability
can occur and the later which is Mr Macron’s expertise.”
STEPHAN GON: “Dolf that’s the least productive copied /pasted piece of
text I’ve read this week.”
DOLF BOEK: “Stephan, you are a simple life entity (not even capable of understanding my own valid informal research on Critique of Pure Reason)
but I am sapient which is given to rationality so don’t subject me to
your strictures of incompressibility which is a perverse narcissistic characteristic of self entitlement which you have ...
One doesn’t answer a fool in relation to the foundation of state
especially when like you they have violated our BOER / ANZAC tradition...
LEST WE FORGET”
JONATHAN PHILLIPS: “Stephan, its not, and never has been 'about the economy'.. its about making our own decisions, and not bankrolling the 'pipe-dreams' of others...”
— HELL’S CLAMOUR —
“OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
PARIS IS BURNING.
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
HELL HAS YEARNING.
FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46 (#358)} FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA @268: “Judgments of experience
are always synthetic. For it would be absurd to base an analytic
judgment on experience, since I do not at all need to go beyond my
concept in order to formulate the judgment and therefore have no need
for any testimony from experience. That a body is extended, is a
proposition that stands certain a priori, and not a #473 - *JUDGEMENT*
of experience.
G2632@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 78 (#119); Ego: 57 (#78),
@4: Sup: 2 (#121); Ego: 5 (#83),
@5: Sup: 22 (#143); Ego: 20 (#103),
@6: Sup: 41 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW
{%36}); Ego: 19 (#122),
@7: Sup: 51 (#235); Ego: 10 (#132),
@8: Sup: 60 (#295); Ego: 9 (#141),
@9: Sup: 68 (#363); Ego: 8 (#149),
Male: #363; Feme: #149
} // #473
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1302 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching:
H32 - Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.
#VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
#TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
#POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
#TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
#CANON: #186
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
@1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
@2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186
#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #5, #20, #100, #10, #9, #8] = katakrínō (G2632): {UMBRA: #43 as #1302 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *GIVE* *JUDGMENT* *AGAINST*,
*TO* *JUDGE* *WORTHY* *OF* *PUNISHMENT*; 1a) to condemn; 1b) by one's
good example to render another's wickedness the more evident and censurable;
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:2,col:5,nous:77&lexicon:G2632>
"The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and
shall condemn-G2632 it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas;
and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here." [Matthew 12:41]
"The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this
generation, and shall condemn-G2632 it: for she came from the uttermost
parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater
than Solomon is here." [Matthew 12:42]
"Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was
condemned-G2632, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces
of silver to the chief priests and elders," [Matthew 27:3]
"Ye have heard the blasphemy: what think ye? And they all
condemned-G2632 him to be guilty of death." [Mark 14:64]
For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my #473 - *JUDGEMENT* already in the concept, from which I merely extract the
predicate in accordance with the principle of #312 - *CONTRADICTION*,
and by this means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity
of the #473 - *JUDGEMENT*, which experience could never teach me. [pages
17-18]
Before the advent of combination therapy within the AIDS crisis if one
engaged within dangerous actions with wanton reckless regard you could
be subject to 25 years imprisonment.
But on a building site apparently you can engage in “constructive
events” such as welding as “dangerous actions with wanton reckless regard” for having fire extinguishers 🧯 within proximity and the Mayor
of Paris thinks it accidental.
What are your values anchored to—surely not reason?
EXCERPT FROM EMAIL TO STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS & MINISTER FOR
DEFENCE / ANZAC 2018 COMMEMORATIONS (HE WAS IN PARIS ON 11 NOVEMBER
2018) ASSISTING THE PRIME MINISTER @ 1627 / 1636 HOURS ON 15 APRIL 2019
TITLED:
"CORRECTION (11 JUNE 2000 AS CROWN IMPLICATIONS ON VIABILITY OF STATE AS COMMONWEALTH) THAT THE NEWS MEDIA CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT
ORDERS RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF COURT HEARINGS OF CARDINAL PELL
BECAUSE THERE IS AN ALLEGED TREASON / PRO DOMO CLAIM RELATING TO 31 MAY
1998 REFUSAL OF COMMUNION"
MARION STATUE DIALOG WITH ARTIST @ 1739 HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018
DOLF: "Can I ask for what purpose you are *LIGHTING* *CANDLES* ma'am?"
ARTIST: "Sorry."
DOLF: "For what purpose are you *LIGHTING* *CANDLES*?"
ARTIST: "Umm"
DOLF: "Why aren't you at the BOER WAR memorial celebrating our ah ...
our ah Australian! Oh you're the artist aren't you ma'am?"
ARTIST: "(laughs) I'm Brenda."
DOLF: "You're the artist."
ARTIST: "Nice to meet you."
DOLF: "Now..."
ARTIST: "What happened is um, the mother in Ireland died and their
service in Ireland is at 7 o'clock tonight."
DOLF: "What. Whose? Is that [statue] after a particular person?"
ARTIST: "Yeah Cathy McMahon."
DOLF: "So this [statue] was created in representation of ..."
ARTIST: "This here ... lighting the candles. Wanting to get the candles
all lit at the start of her service."
DOLF: "Okay. It's a Catholic [memorial] service is it?"
ARTIST: "Umm. I['m] not [entirely sure]. I think she is in the
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH*."
DOLF: "Yes. Is this statue related to her in any manner?"
ARTIST: "Yes she is a mother."
DOLF: "Is she the mother depicted [by] the statue."
ARTIST: "No it depicts. The statue depicts all mothers [of which *OUR*
*LADY* [meaning: NOTRE DAME (the French term added later)] is the
exemplar]."
DOLF: "Yes. Yeah. The problem is that with the BOER WAR Memorial on the
31 May ..."
ARTIST: "Yes"
DOLF: "... I hugged a mother [at] refusal of Communion at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne on 31 May 1998."
ARTIST: "Really."
DOLF: "And she was refused communion because she was wearing a rainbow
sash."
ARTIST: "Oh really."
DOLF: "For no other reason. So I have an objection for it. *NOW*
*WOULD* *YOU* *DO* *ME* *A* *FAVOUR* *TO* *APPEASE*, *TO* *BALANCE*
*THE* *KARMA* *OF* *THINGS*. Because..."
...
DOLF: "... I'm going to take the council to court over this particular
matter. Because there is no object of respect at the BOER WAR Memorial."
ARTIST: "So what are you doing taking this to court?"
DOLF: "I'm taking this and the BOER yeah ... this is part of that. This
is part of *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* which I have been subject to.
When a mother weeps for her children..."
ARTIST: "But this is what this is."
DOLF: "Yeah that is exactly what our 'LEST WE FORGET' poem is all about."
ARTIST: "So why are you against this?"
DOLF: "I'm against this because I happen to be JEWISH and ..."
ARTIST: "Oh okay my darling yes..."
DOLF: "And this is a MARION statue. Now if you really want to IRISH
persons its the WASHER WOMAN that was the person who was most ..."
ARTIST: "No no..."
DOLF: "The WASHER WOMAN in IRISH society was subject to more impunity
than any other woman within IRISH society."
ARTIST: "But you know it's interesting that you say that you're um ah
... JEWISH because the man that led this through the COMMONWEALTH games
... through the COMMONWEALTH government was JEWISH."
DOLF: "Yes but he should know better we don't ... they don't allow
statues in their TEMPLE precinct. And the circumstance that we have is
that I'm of DUTCH heritage and the [INTERNATIONAL] KNIGHTS TEMPLAR which
was formed in 2015 are associated with the ORDER that [DUTCH EXPLORER]
DIRK HARTOG signed the PEWTER PLATE with. So if you want to *TALK*
*ABOUT* *ERECTIONS* [*OF* *COMMEMORATIVE* *MERIT*] DIRK HARTOG signed it
as AO and their were SEVEN PAPAL BULLS associated with my INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
As the RIGHT OF WOMEN which is the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS."
ARTIST: "So why are you against this? Why are you going to bring this
into your argument?"
DOLF: "Because WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE was the RIGHT of the exercise of
VOLUNTARY WILL in political life and this [statue] is not."
ARTIST: "What do you mean?"
DOLF: "This is not."
ARTIST: "What do you mean?"
DOLF: "Women in IRELAND have just been [granted the right of *ABORTION*]
..."
ARTIST: "No no hang on a moment.."
DOLF: "Women in IRELAND ... this was put here on SAINT PATRICK'S DAY of
all people. Of all places."
ARTIST: "But I chose that."
DOLF: "You should not have done that. Its representing [only the] IRISH..."
ARTIST: "No it's not. No it's not."
DOLF: "Well because that ... there was no PLAQUE here on the day that it
was [unveiled] ..."
ARTIST: "No but I didn't. I wasn't able to get it ..."
DOLF: "Let me finish..."
ARTIST: "No but you let me finish. I wasn't able ..."
DOLF: "There was no PLAQUE here on the day it was installed."
ARTIST: "Yes there was."
DOLF: "No there wasn't."
ARTIST: "I'm sorry SIR I unveiled the PLAQUE."
DOLF: "I'm sorry ma'am but I took pictures. And I took the picture on
the 8 JUNE when the PLAQUE was unveiled and then I went to the BOER WAR MEMORIAL and there were tributes there as well.
So that's good day to you ma'am."
[walking away]
ARTIST: "Who are you taking it to?"
DOLF: "I will take you to court as well."
[walking away]
THE POLICE ATTENDED AND REPEATED THE UNSUSTAINABLE FALSE ACCUSATION THAT
I WAS IN ANY MANNER THREATENING. AND I *CONVEYED* *AT* *THE* *TIME*
*OF* *MY* *POLICE* *EMERGENCY* *CALL* *WHICH* *WAS* *MADE* *DUE* *TO*
*THE* *FIRE* *RISK* *BY* *NUMEROUS* *CANDLES* *UPON* *THE* #473 -
*GARDEN* *BED* *WITH* *NO* *FIRE* *EXTINGUISHER* *PRESENT*, THAT THE
ARTIST APPEARED TO HAVE MENTAL STABILITY ISSUES.
G4160@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 69 (#149); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 10 (#160),
@4: Sup: 6 (#234); Ego: 8 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@5: Sup: 63 (#297); Ego: 57 (#225),
@6: Sup: 68 (#365); Ego: 5 (#230),
Male: #365; Feme: #230
} // #473
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#473 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #5] = poiéō (G4160): {UMBRA: #48 as
#965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things made, to
produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the
cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot forth;
1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a thing
out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1) to (make
i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to appoint or ordain one that;
1g2) *TO* (*MAKE* IE.) *DECLARE* *ONE* *ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth,
to lead him out; 1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j)
*TO* *BE* *THE* *AUTHORS* *OF* *A* *THING* (*TO* *CAUSE*, *BRING*
*ABOUT*); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well; 2a1) to carry out, to
execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one; 2c) with
designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep; 2d1) *TO*
*MAKE* *READY*, *AND* *SO* *AT* *THE* *SAME* *TIME* *TO* *INSTITUTE*,
*THE* *CELEBRATION* *OF* *THE* *PASSOVER*; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:2,col:5,nous:77&lexicon:G4160>
"For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The
voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make-G4160 his paths straight." [Matthew 3:3]
THAT THEY ONLY HAD RECOURSE TO THE SLANDER OF THREATENING CONDUCT (WHICH
THE TONE OF THE CONVERSATION DOES NOT CONVEY) WHEN IT WAS EVIDENT THERE
WAS A LACK OF TRUTH CONTENT [IN] THEIR RESPONSES TO REASONABLE QUESTIONS.
THE AUDIO RECORDINGS WERE NECESSARY TO GUARANTEE MY OWN SAFETY AND
INTEGRITY AND WITHOUT SUCH I WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY BEEN ARRESTED FOR THREATENING CONDUCT WHICH DID NOT OCCUR AND NEVER INTENTIONED.
AT THE TIME OF PROVIDING THE POLICE WITH A COPY OF THE AUDIO RECORDING
IT WAS CONVEYED THAT THE CAMELLIA {so named after Georg Joseph Kamel (21
April 1661 – 2 May 1706) a Jesuit missionary, pharmacist and naturalist
known for producing the first comprehensive accounts of Philippine flora
and fauna and for introducing Philippine nature to the European learned
world} FLORAL TRIBUTE LEFT AT THE MARION SHRINE WAS REMOVED AND PLACED
AT THE BOER WAR MEMORIAL AND REMAINED THERE UNTIL AFTER 31 MAY 2018.
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #58 - POLITICAL REVERSAL, ADAPTATION TO CHANGE AS IDEA @358: “This type of cognition is cognition according to analogy, which surely does not signify, as the word is
usually taken, an imperfect similarity between two things, but rather a
perfect similarity between two relations in wholly dissimilar things.
Such is an analogy between the legal relation of human actions and the mechanical relation of moving forces: I can never do anything to another without giving him a right to do the same to me under the same
conditions; just as a body cannot act on another body with its motive
force without thereby causing the other body to react just as much on
it. Right and motive force are here completely dissimilar things, but in
their relation there is nonetheless complete similarity. By means of
such an analogy I can therefore provide a concept of a relation to
things that are absolutely unknown to me. E.g., THE PROMOTION OF THE
HAPPINESS OF THE CHILDREN = A IS TO THE LOVE OF THE PARENTS = B AS THE
WELFARE OF HUMANKIND = C IS TO THE UNKNOWN IN GOD = *X*, WHICH WE CALL
LOVE: not as if this unknown had the least similarity with any human inclination, but because we can posit the relation between God’s love
and the world to be similar to that which things in the world have to
one another. But here the concept of the relation is a mere category,
namely the concept of cause, which has nothing to do with sensibility.
By means of this analogy there still remains a concept of the supreme
being sufficiently determinate for us, though we have omitted everything
that could have determined this concept unconditionally and in itself;
for we determine the concept only with respect to the world and hence
with respect to us, and we have no need of more. The attacks that Hume
makes against those who want to determine this concept absolutely –
since they borrow the materials for this determination from themselves
and from the world – do not touch us; he also cannot reproach us that
nothing whatsoever would remain for us if objective anthropomorphism
were subtracted from the concept of the supreme being.
— HYMN TO ZEUS —
“Most glorious of immortals, Zeus
The many named, almighty evermore,
Nature's great Sovereign, ruling all by law
Hail to thee! On thee 'tis meet and right
That mortals everywhere should call.
From thee was our begetting; ours alone
Of all that live and move upon the earth
The lot to bear God's likeness.
Thee will I ever chant, thy power praise!
For thee this whole vast cosmos, wheeling round
The earth, obeys, and where thou leadest
It follows, ruled willingly by thee.
In thy unconquerable hands thou holdest fast,
Ready prepared, that two-timed flaming blast,
The ever-living thunderbolt:
Nature's own stroke brings all things to their end.
By it thou guidest aright the sense instinct
Which spreads through all things, mingled even
With stars in heaven, the great and small --
Thou who art King supreme for evermore!
Naught upon earth is wrought in thy despite, O God.
Nor in the ethereal sphere aloft which ever winds
About its pole, nor in the sea -- save only what
The wicked work, in their strange madness,
Yet even so, thou knowest to make the crooked straight.
Prune all excess, give order to the orderless,
For unto thee the unloved still is lovely--
And thus in one all things are harmonized,
The evil with the good, that so one Word
Should be in all things everlastingly.
One Word--which evermore the wicked flee!
Ill-fated, hungering to possess the good
They have no vision of God's universal law,
Nor will they hear, though if obedient in mind
They might obtain a noble life, true wealth.
Instead they rush unthinking after ill:
Some with a shameless zeal for fame,
Others pursuing gain, disorderly;
Still others folly, or pleasures of the flesh.
[But evils are their lot] and other times
Bring other harvests, all unsought--
For all their great desire, its opposite!
But, Zeus, thou giver of every gift,
Who dwellest within the dark clouds, wielding still
The flashing stroke of lightning, save, we pray,
Thy children from this boundless misery.
Scatter, O Father, the darkness from their souls,
Grant them to find true understanding
On which relying thou justly rulest all---
While we, thus honoured, in turn will honour thee,
Hymning thy works forever, as is meet
For mortals while no greater right
Belongs even to the gods than evermore
Justly to praise the universal law!” [Cleanthes (c. 3rd century BCE)]
For if one only grants us, at the outset, the deistic concept of a first
being as a necessary hypothesis (as does Hume in his Dialogues in the
person of Philo as opposed to Cleanthes [c.330-c.230] who was a Greek
Stoic philosopher and followed of Zeno, the founder of the school of
Stoicism. We have only fragments of the fifty works ascribed to
Cleanthes, the largest fragment being the Hymn to Zeus), which is a
concept in which one thinks the first being by means of ontological
predicates alone, of substance, cause, etc. (something that one must do,
since reason, being driven in the sensible world solely by conditions
that are always again conditioned, cannot have any satisfaction at all
without this being done, and something that one very well can do without falling into that anthropomorphism which transfers predicates from the
sensible world onto a being wholly distinct from the world, since the predicates listed here are mere categories, which cannot indeed provide
any determinate concept of that being, but which, for that very reason,
do not provide a concept of it that is limited to the conditions of sensibility) – then nothing can keep us from predicating of this being a causality through reason with respect to the world, and thus from
crossing over to theism, but without our being compelled to attribute
this reason to that being in itself, as a property inhering in it. For, concerning the first point, the only possible way to compel the use of
reason in the sensible world (with respect to all possible experience)
into the most thorough- going harmony with itself is to assume, in turn,
a supreme reason as a cause of all connections in the world; such a
principle must be thoroughly advantageous to reason and can nowhere harm
it in its use in nature.
Regarding the second point, however, reason is not thereby transposed as
a property onto the first being in itself, but only onto the relation of
that being to the sensible world, and therefore anthropomorphism is
completely avoided. For here only the cause of the rational form found everywhere in the world is considered, and the supreme being, insofar as
it contains the basis of this rational form of the world, is indeed
ascribed reason, but only by analogy, i.e., insofar as this expression signifies only the relation that the highest cause (which is unknown to
us) has to the world, in order to determine everything in it with the
highest degree of conformity to reason. We thereby avoid using the
property of reason in order to think God, but instead think the world
through it in the manner necessary to have the greatest possible use of
reason with respect to the world in accordance with a principle. We
thereby admit that the supreme being, as to what it may be in itself, is
for us wholly inscrutable and is even unthinkable by us in a determinate manner; and we are thereby prevented from making any transcendent use of
the concepts that we have of reason as an efficient cause (through
willing) in order to determine the divine nature through properties that
are in any case always borrowed only from human nature, and so from
losing ourselves in crude or *FANATICAL* concepts, and, on the other
hand, we are also prevented from swamping the contemplation of the world
with hyperphysical modes of explanation according to concepts of human
reason we have transposed onto God, and so from diverting this
contemplation from its true vocation, according to which it is supposed
to be a study of mere nature through reason, and not an audacious
derivation of the appearances of nature from a supreme reason. The
expression suitable to our weak concepts will be: that we think the
world as if it derives from a supreme reason, as regards its existence
and inner determination; whereby we in part cognize the constitution
belonging to it (the world) itself, without presuming to want to
determine that of its cause in itself, and, on the other hand, we in
part posit the basis of this constitution (the rational form of the
world) in the relation of the highest cause to the world, not finding
the world by itself sufficient thereto.
HIS HONOUR MIGHT WELL BE GRIEVED THAT THE ACTIONS IN SUPERSEDING AS INVALIDATING OF THOSE LETTERS PATENT which I have taken independently
from the COURT has simply taken advantage of the COURT's naivety as the impertinence that HIS HONOUR IS IGNORANT in having no conception that
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)