XPost: soc.culture.pacific-island, alt.culture.african, alt.fan.countries.ghana XPost: alt.politics.africa
-- THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BREXIT AS SAPIENT ECONOMY
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 15 April, 2019
FRANCE24 (ENGLISH) @ 1814 HOURS ON 13 APRIL 2019: “COULD MACRON AND
BREXIT MAKE PARIS THE CAPITAL OF EUROPEAN TECH?
Shortly after his election in May 2017, President Macron said he wanted
France itself “to think and move like a start-up” – a vision of the country’s digital future that is gaining traction as Britain wrestles
with BREXIT.
French President Emmanuel Macron’s vow to make France a ‘start-up
nation’ amid the uncertainty over BREXITIS raising the question of
whether Paris could supplant London as the capital of European tech.
Since his election, Macron has wooed *TECHNOLOGY* entrepreneurs with a
string of initiatives in the form of lavish tax breaks, subsides, and
credits for research. In March 2018, he promised to invest €1.5 billion
into artificial intelligence research through 2022.
Some of these initiatives, in addition to Macron’s dynamism, have lured British tech companies who are looking to gain a foothold in Europe."
<
https://www.france24.com/en/20190413-france-paris-macron-brexit-tech-capital-european-station-f>
MARTIN DAVIES: “Time to stop BREXIT before more jobs, businesses and hardworking EU citizens abandon the U.K. for good.”
DOLF BOEK: “But only Britain has the means to define the Sovereign /
Autonomy dynamic which a sapient economy requires.
And their political opportunism are no different to Mr Macron’s in that
any viable political life requires a favourably motivated constituency otherwise how will they retain office.”
DAVID NICOL: “Time for the losers to accept democracy.”
STEPHAN GON: “David, it’s about economy this time, you reflect the
innate ignorance of the bulk of BREXITERS, now you go back reading more
lies from the side of that bus."
KURT SHUBERT: “Dolf any business relationship requires working with your partners & biggest customers. The best deal the UK can have and still
retain x amount of autonomy is to remain a part of the EU.”
DOLF BOEK: “Kurt, I have made a further statement given such incapacity
to comprehend that the microcosm as the trinomial metastasised
conception of state being sovereign / autonomy dynamic must be
understood before the binomial stasis of macroeconomic interoperability
can occur and the later which is Mr Macron’s expertise.”
STEPHAN GON: “Dolf that’s the least productive copied /pasted piece of
text I’ve read this week.”
DOLF BOEK: “Stephan, you are a simple life entity (not even capable of understanding my own valid informal research on Critique of Pure Reason)
but I am sapient which is given to rationality so don’t subject me to
your strictures of incompressibility which is a perverse narcissistic characteristic of self entitlement which you have ...
One doesn’t answer a fool in relation to the foundation of state
especially when like you they have violated our BOER / ANZAC tradition...
LEST WE FORGET”
JONATHAN PHILLIPS: “Stephan, its not, and never has been 'about the economy'.. its about making our own decisions, and not bankrolling the 'pipe-dreams' of others...”
— HELL’S CLAMOUR —
“OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
PARIS IS BURNING.
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
HELL HAS YEARNING.
FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46 (#358)} FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA @268: “Judgments of experience
are always synthetic. For it would be absurd to base an analytic
judgment on experience, since I do not at all need to go beyond my
concept in order to formulate the judgment and therefore have no need
for any testimony from experience. That a body is extended, is a
proposition that stands certain a priori, and not a judgment of experience.
For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my judgment already in the concept, from which I merely extract the predicate in
accordance with the principle of #312 - *CONTRADICTION*, and by this
means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity of the
judgment, which experience could never teach me. [pages 17-18]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #58 - POLITICAL REVERSAL, ADAPTATION TO CHANGE AS IDEA @358: “This type of cognition is cognition according to analogy, which surely does not signify, as the word is
usually taken, an imperfect similarity between two things, but rather a
perfect similarity between two relations in wholly dissimilar things.
Such is an analogy between the legal relation of human actions and the mechanical relation of moving forces: I can never do anything to another without giving him a right to do the same to me under the same
conditions; just as a body cannot act on another body with its motive
force without thereby causing the other body to react just as much on
it. Right and motive force are here completely dissimilar things, but in
their relation there is nonetheless complete similarity. By means of
such an analogy I can therefore provide a concept of a relation to
things that are absolutely unknown to me. E.g., THE PROMOTION OF THE
HAPPINESS OF THE CHILDREN = A IS TO THE LOVE OF THE PARENTS = B AS THE
WELFARE OF HUMANKIND = C IS TO THE UNKNOWN IN GOD = X, WHICH WE CALL
LOVE: not as if this unknown had the least similarity with any human inclination, but because we can posit the relation between God’s love
and the world to be similar to that which things in the world have to
one another. But here the concept of the relation is a mere category,
namely the concept of cause, which has nothing to do with sensibility.
By means of this analogy there still remains a concept of the supreme
being sufficiently determinate for us, though we have omitted everything
that could have determined this concept unconditionally and in itself;
for we determine the concept only with respect to the world and hence
with respect to us, and we have no need of more. The attacks that Hume
makes against those who want to determine this concept absolutely –
since they borrow the materials for this determination from themselves
and from the world – do not touch us; he also cannot reproach us that
nothing whatsoever would remain for us if objective anthropomorphism
were subtracted from the concept of the supreme being.
— HYMN TO ZEUS —
“Most glorious of immortals, Zeus
The many named, almighty evermore,
Nature's great Sovereign, ruling all by law
Hail to thee! On thee 'tis meet and right
That mortals everywhere should call.
From thee was our begetting; ours alone
Of all that live and move upon the earth
The lot to bear God's likeness.
Thee will I ever chant, thy power praise!
For thee this whole vast cosmos, wheeling round
The earth, obeys, and where thou leadest
It follows, ruled willingly by thee.
In thy unconquerable hands thou holdest fast,
Ready prepared, that two-timed flaming blast,
The ever-living thunderbolt:
Nature's own stroke brings all things to their end.
By it thou guidest aright the sense instinct
Which spreads through all things, mingled even
With stars in heaven, the great and small --
Thou who art King supreme for evermore!
Naught upon earth is wrought in thy despite, O God.
Nor in the ethereal sphere aloft which ever winds
About its pole, nor in the sea -- save only what
The wicked work, in their strange madness,
Yet even so, thou knowest to make the crooked straight.
Prune all excess, give order to the orderless,
For unto thee the unloved still is lovely--
And thus in one all things are harmonized,
The evil with the good, that so one Word
Should be in all things everlastingly.
One Word--which evermore the wicked flee!
Ill-fated, hungering to possess the good
They have no vision of God's universal law,
Nor will they hear, though if obedient in mind
They might obtain a noble life, true wealth.
Instead they rush unthinking after ill:
Some with a shameless zeal for fame,
Others pursuing gain, disorderly;
Still others folly, or pleasures of the flesh.
[But evils are their lot] and other times
Bring other harvests, all unsought--
For all their great desire, its opposite!
But, Zeus, thou giver of every gift,
Who dwellest within the dark clouds, wielding still
The flashing stroke of lightning, save, we pray,
Thy children from this boundless misery.
Scatter, O Father, the darkness from their souls,
Grant them to find true understanding
On which relying thou justly rulest all---
While we, thus honoured, in turn will honour thee,
Hymning thy works forever, as is meet
For mortals while no greater right
Belongs even to the gods than evermore
Justly to praise the universal law!” [Cleanthes (c. 3rd century BCE)]
For if one only grants us, at the outset, the deistic concept of a first
being as a necessary hypothesis (as does Hume in his Dialogues in the
person of Philo as opposed to Cleanthes [c.330-c.230] who was a Greek
Stoic philosopher and followed of Zeno, the founder of the school of
Stoicism. We have only fragments of the fifty works ascribed to
Cleanthes, the largest fragment being the Hymn to Zeus), which is a
concept in which one thinks the first being by means of ontological
predicates alone, of substance, cause, etc. (something that one must do,
since reason, being driven in the sensible world solely by conditions
that are always again conditioned, cannot have any satisfaction at all
without this being done, and something that one very well can do without falling into that anthropomorphism which transfers predicates from the
sensible world onto a being wholly distinct from the world, since the predicates listed here are mere categories, which cannot indeed provide
any determinate concept of that being, but which, for that very reason,
do not provide a concept of it that is limited to the conditions of sensibility) – then nothing can keep us from predicating of this being a causality through reason with respect to the world, and thus from
crossing over to theism, but without our being compelled to attribute
this reason to that being in itself, as a property inhering in it. For, concerning the first point, the only possible way to compel the use of
reason in the sensible world (with respect to all possible experience)
into the most thorough- going harmony with itself is to assume, in turn,
a supreme reason as a cause of all connections in the world; such a
principle must be thoroughly advantageous to reason and can nowhere harm
it in its use in nature.
Regarding the second point, however, reason is not thereby transposed as
a property onto the first being in itself, but only onto the relation of
that being to the sensible world, and therefore anthropomorphism is
completely avoided. For here only the cause of the rational form found everywhere in the world is considered, and the supreme being, insofar as
it contains the basis of this rational form of the world, is indeed
ascribed reason, but only by analogy, i.e., insofar as this expression signifies only the relation that the highest cause (which is unknown to
us) has to the world, in order to determine everything in it with the
highest degree of conformity to reason. We thereby avoid using the
property of reason in order to think God, but instead think the world
through it in the manner necessary to have the greatest possible use of
reason with respect to the world in accordance with a principle. We
thereby admit that the supreme being, as to what it may be in itself, is
for us wholly inscrutable and is even unthinkable by us in a determinate manner; and we are thereby prevented from making any transcendent use of
the concepts that we have of reason as an efficient cause (through
willing) in order to determine the divine nature through properties that
are in any case always borrowed only from human nature, and so from
losing ourselves in crude or *FANATICAL* concepts, and, on the other
hand, we are also prevented from swamping the contemplation of the world
with hyperphysical modes of explanation according to concepts of human
reason we have transposed onto God, and so from diverting this
contemplation from its true vocation, according to which it is supposed
to be a study of mere nature through reason, and not an audacious
derivation of the appearances of nature from a supreme reason. The
expression suitable to our weak concepts will be: that we think the
world as if it derives from a supreme reason, as regards its existence
and inner determination; whereby we in part cognize the constitution
belonging to it (the world) itself, without presuming to want to
determine that of its cause in itself, and, on the other hand, we in
part posit the basis of this constitution (the rational form of the
world) in the relation of the highest cause to the world, not finding
the world by itself sufficient thereto.
HIS HONOUR MIGHT WELL BE GRIEVED THAT THE ACTIONS IN SUPERSEDING AS INVALIDATING OF THOSE LETTERS PATENT which I have taken independently
from the COURT has simply taken advantage of the COURT's naivety as the impertinence that HIS HONOUR IS IGNORANT in having no conception that
someone greater than he is standing before him. That I achieved great
things today in relation to MATTERS previously placed before the COURT
as an accountability made of others such that 1.2 billion ROMAN
CATHOLICS (ie. More than 40% of the world's Catholics live in Latin
America - but Africa has seen the biggest growth in Catholic
congregations in recent years) will not be able to CELEBRATE EASTER with
any clear conscience because *I* *HAVE* *STOLEN* *THEIR* *THUNDER* *AND*
*THEY* *CAN'T* *GET* *IT* *BACK*." [EXCERPT FROM COURT NOTE OF 1040
HOURS ON 3 APRIL 2019 RELATING TO COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBERS:
AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202]
YOUTUBE: "Whatever It Takes (Imagine Dragons)"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOsM-DYAEhY>
In Greek mythology, it was Prometheus (Greek: Προμηθεύς possibly meaning
"forethought") as the Titan, culture hero, and trickster figure who is
credited with the creation of man from clay, and who *DEFIES* *THE*
*GODS* *BY* *STEALING* *FIRE* and giving it to humanity, an act that
enabled progress and civilisation. Prometheus is known for his
intelligence and as a champion of mankind and also seen as the author of
the human arts and sciences generally.
FORETHOUGHT (BEFORE TIME)@[
Π, {@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80)},
ρ, {@2: Sup: 18 (#98); Ego: 19 (#99)},
ο, {@3: Sup: 7 (#105); Ego: 70 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18})},
μ, {@4: Sup: 47 (#152); Ego: 40 (#209)},
η, {@5: Sup: 55 (#207); Ego: 8 (#217)},
θ, {@6: Sup: 64 (#271: KANT"S IDEA ON *GENERAL* *QUESTION* *OF* *THE* *PROLEGOMENA*: *IS* *METAPHYSICS* *POSSIBLE* *AT* *ALL*?); Ego: 9 (#226)},
ε, {@7: Sup: 69 (#340); Ego: 5 (#231 - *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*)},
υ, {@8: Sup: 64 (#404); Ego: 76 (#307)},
ς] {@9: Sup: 21 (#425); Ego: 38 (#345)},
In another myth, Prometheus establishes the form of animal sacrifice
practiced in ancient Greek religion. Evidence of a cult to Prometheus
himself is not widespread. He was a focus of religious activity mainly
at Athens, where he was linked to Athena and Hephaestus, other Greek
deities of creative skills and *TECHNOLOGY*. [Ref: Wikipedia
2019:Prometheus]
In this way the difficulties that appear to oppose theism disappear, in
that to Hume’s principle, not to drive the use of reason dogmatically
beyond the field of all possible experience, we conjoin another
principle that Hume completely overlooked, namely: *NOT* *TO* *LOOK*
*UPON* *THE* *FIELD* *OF* *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *AS* *SOMETHING*
*THAT* *BOUNDS* *ITSELF* *IN* *THE* *EYES* *OF* *OUR* *REASON*. A
critique of reason indicates the true middle way between the dogmatism
that Hume fought and the skepticism he wanted to introduce instead – a
middle way that, unlike other middle ways, which we are advised to
determine for ourselves as it were mechanically (something from one
side, and something from the other), and by which no one is taught any
better, is one, rather, that can be determined precisely, according to principles." [Pages 109-110]
Nous: #36
Time: 01:40 hrs
Date: 2019.4.15
Torah:
Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering
#260 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH {#324
/ #326}
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:8,nous:36&lexicon:H776>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 36 [Date: 2019.4.15, Time: 01:40
hrs, Super: #325 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #367 / #36 -
Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile
Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot,
Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]
H776@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
@3: Sup: 37 (#79); Ego: 1 (#37),
@4: Sup: 75 (#154); Ego: 38 (#75),
@5: Sup: 3 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 9 (#84 - I AM NOT
A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@6: Sup: 36 (#193); Ego: 33 (#117),
Male: #193; Feme: #117
} // #367
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #291 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
at Elephantine; I am not rapacious.
#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102
#367 as [#6, #30, #1, #200, #90, #600] = ʼerets (H776): {UMBRA: #3 as
#291 % #41 = #4} 1) land, earth; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed
to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) space or distance
of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain country;
1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost wholly
late in usage); 1e1) lands, countries; i) often in contrast to Canaan;
BINOMIAL APPARATUS {#36}:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
"ANYONE WHO FOR FALSE REASONS OF MERCY DEVIATES FROM THIS CLEAR
PRINCIPLE IS AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, WILLINGLY {H7521:
ratsah / accept: #273} OR UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273;
H4784: marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE
DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: (7 JUNE
1942) @235, page #519]
In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of PERENNIALISM having by the immateriality of its STASIS which defines a SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances have a
predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of narcissistic self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed
dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the
mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic elements expressed therein
and perhaps not realising that it is also subject to the @205 -
PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE DIGNITY ROYAL
(LETTERS PATENT)} and @82 / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (SECTION IX)
in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS METHODOLOGY which itself
conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC
PRINCIPLE that are encapsulated by the @164 / #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW.
"I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE* *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL},
*NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 - *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE}
wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY*
*FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or poorer, in sickness
and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do we part, today I
pledge my faithfulness."
H376@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
@3: Sup: 81 (#142); Ego: 50 (#81),
@4: Sup: 57 (#199); Ego: 57 (#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#266); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #266; Feme: #148
} // #391
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #311 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181
#391 as [#30, #1, #50, #300, #10] = ʼîysh (H376): {UMBRA: #0 as #311 %
#41 = #24} 1) man; 1a) man, male (in contrast to woman, female); 1b)
husband; 1c) human being, person (in contrast to God); 1d) servant; 1e) mankind; 1f) champion; 1g) great man; 2) whosoever; 3) each (adjective);
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H376>
H802@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 56 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 57 (#137),
@4: Sup: 66 (#232); Ego: 10 (#147),
Male: #232; Feme: #147
} // #390
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #306 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I commit not adultery with another's wife.
#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180
#390 as [#30, #50, #300, #10] = ʼishshâh (H802): {UMBRA: #0 as #306 %
#41 = #19} 1) woman, wife, female; 1a) woman (opposite of man); 1b) wife
(woman married to a man); 1c) female (of animals); 1d) each, every
(pronoun);
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H802>
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273
-SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11
SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR
ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT
THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.
AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES
<
http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our “cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. There are more than 6 billion people in the world today, and
though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have
identified only eight thus far.
Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]
Accordingly we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF
JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*].
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)
#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESTING NORM (COVET NOT)
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED
} ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 - CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)