• -- UPDATED (STOLEN FIRE / STOLEN THUNDER) THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BR

    From dolf@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 16 10:48:30 2019
    XPost: soc.culture.pacific-island, alt.culture.african, alt.fan.countries.ghana XPost: alt.politics.africa

    -- THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BREXIT AS SAPIENT ECONOMY

    (c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 15 April, 2019

    FRANCE24 (ENGLISH) @ 1814 HOURS ON 13 APRIL 2019: “COULD MACRON AND
    BREXIT MAKE PARIS THE CAPITAL OF EUROPEAN TECH?

    Shortly after his election in May 2017, President Macron said he wanted
    France itself “to think and move like a start-up” – a vision of the country’s digital future that is gaining traction as Britain wrestles
    with BREXIT.

    French President Emmanuel Macron’s vow to make France a ‘start-up
    nation’ amid the uncertainty over BREXITIS raising the question of
    whether Paris could supplant London as the capital of European tech.

    Since his election, Macron has wooed *TECHNOLOGY* entrepreneurs with a
    string of initiatives in the form of lavish tax breaks, subsides, and
    credits for research. In March 2018, he promised to invest €1.5 billion
    into artificial intelligence research through 2022.

    Some of these initiatives, in addition to Macron’s dynamism, have lured British tech companies who are looking to gain a foothold in Europe."

    <https://www.france24.com/en/20190413-france-paris-macron-brexit-tech-capital-european-station-f>

    MARTIN DAVIES: “Time to stop BREXIT before more jobs, businesses and hardworking EU citizens abandon the U.K. for good.”

    DOLF BOEK: “But only Britain has the means to define the Sovereign /
    Autonomy dynamic which a sapient economy requires.

    And their political opportunism are no different to Mr Macron’s in that
    any viable political life requires a favourably motivated constituency otherwise how will they retain office.”

    DAVID NICOL: “Time for the losers to accept democracy.”

    STEPHAN GON: “David, it’s about economy this time, you reflect the
    innate ignorance of the bulk of BREXITERS, now you go back reading more
    lies from the side of that bus."

    KURT SHUBERT: “Dolf any business relationship requires working with your partners & biggest customers. The best deal the UK can have and still
    retain x amount of autonomy is to remain a part of the EU.”

    DOLF BOEK: “Kurt, I have made a further statement given such incapacity
    to comprehend that the microcosm as the trinomial metastasised
    conception of state being sovereign / autonomy dynamic must be
    understood before the binomial stasis of macroeconomic interoperability
    can occur and the later which is Mr Macron’s expertise.”

    STEPHAN GON: “Dolf that’s the least productive copied /pasted piece of
    text I’ve read this week.”

    DOLF BOEK: “Stephan, you are a simple life entity (not even capable of understanding my own valid informal research on Critique of Pure Reason)
    but I am sapient which is given to rationality so don’t subject me to
    your strictures of incompressibility which is a perverse narcissistic characteristic of self entitlement which you have ...

    One doesn’t answer a fool in relation to the foundation of state
    especially when like you they have violated our BOER / ANZAC tradition...

    LEST WE FORGET”

    JONATHAN PHILLIPS: “Stephan, its not, and never has been 'about the economy'.. its about making our own decisions, and not bankrolling the 'pipe-dreams' of others...”

    — HELL’S CLAMOUR —

    “OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
    PARIS IS BURNING.
    AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
    HELL HAS YEARNING.
    FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
    A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46 (#358)} FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”

    IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA @268: “Judgments of experience
    are always synthetic. For it would be absurd to base an analytic
    judgment on experience, since I do not at all need to go beyond my
    concept in order to formulate the judgment and therefore have no need
    for any testimony from experience. That a body is extended, is a
    proposition that stands certain a priori, and not a judgment of experience.

    For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my judgment already in the concept, from which I merely extract the predicate in
    accordance with the principle of #312 - *CONTRADICTION*, and by this
    means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity of the
    judgment, which experience could never teach me. [pages 17-18]

    IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #58 - POLITICAL REVERSAL, ADAPTATION TO CHANGE AS IDEA @358: “This type of cognition is cognition according to analogy, which surely does not signify, as the word is
    usually taken, an imperfect similarity between two things, but rather a
    perfect similarity between two relations in wholly dissimilar things.

    Such is an analogy between the legal relation of human actions and the mechanical relation of moving forces: I can never do anything to another without giving him a right to do the same to me under the same
    conditions; just as a body cannot act on another body with its motive
    force without thereby causing the other body to react just as much on
    it. Right and motive force are here completely dissimilar things, but in
    their relation there is nonetheless complete similarity. By means of
    such an analogy I can therefore provide a concept of a relation to
    things that are absolutely unknown to me. E.g., THE PROMOTION OF THE
    HAPPINESS OF THE CHILDREN = A IS TO THE LOVE OF THE PARENTS = B AS THE
    WELFARE OF HUMANKIND = C IS TO THE UNKNOWN IN GOD = X, WHICH WE CALL
    LOVE: not as if this unknown had the least similarity with any human inclination, but because we can posit the relation between God’s love
    and the world to be similar to that which things in the world have to
    one another. But here the concept of the relation is a mere category,
    namely the concept of cause, which has nothing to do with sensibility.

    By means of this analogy there still remains a concept of the supreme
    being sufficiently determinate for us, though we have omitted everything
    that could have determined this concept unconditionally and in itself;
    for we determine the concept only with respect to the world and hence
    with respect to us, and we have no need of more. The attacks that Hume
    makes against those who want to determine this concept absolutely –
    since they borrow the materials for this determination from themselves
    and from the world – do not touch us; he also cannot reproach us that
    nothing whatsoever would remain for us if objective anthropomorphism
    were subtracted from the concept of the supreme being.

    — HYMN TO ZEUS —

    “Most glorious of immortals, Zeus
    The many named, almighty evermore,
    Nature's great Sovereign, ruling all by law
    Hail to thee! On thee 'tis meet and right

    That mortals everywhere should call.
    From thee was our begetting; ours alone
    Of all that live and move upon the earth
    The lot to bear God's likeness.
    Thee will I ever chant, thy power praise!

    For thee this whole vast cosmos, wheeling round
    The earth, obeys, and where thou leadest
    It follows, ruled willingly by thee.
    In thy unconquerable hands thou holdest fast,
    Ready prepared, that two-timed flaming blast,
    The ever-living thunderbolt:
    Nature's own stroke brings all things to their end.
    By it thou guidest aright the sense instinct
    Which spreads through all things, mingled even
    With stars in heaven, the great and small --
    Thou who art King supreme for evermore!

    Naught upon earth is wrought in thy despite, O God.
    Nor in the ethereal sphere aloft which ever winds
    About its pole, nor in the sea -- save only what
    The wicked work, in their strange madness,
    Yet even so, thou knowest to make the crooked straight.
    Prune all excess, give order to the orderless,
    For unto thee the unloved still is lovely--
    And thus in one all things are harmonized,
    The evil with the good, that so one Word
    Should be in all things everlastingly.

    One Word--which evermore the wicked flee!
    Ill-fated, hungering to possess the good
    They have no vision of God's universal law,
    Nor will they hear, though if obedient in mind
    They might obtain a noble life, true wealth.
    Instead they rush unthinking after ill:
    Some with a shameless zeal for fame,
    Others pursuing gain, disorderly;
    Still others folly, or pleasures of the flesh.
    [But evils are their lot] and other times
    Bring other harvests, all unsought--
    For all their great desire, its opposite!

    But, Zeus, thou giver of every gift,
    Who dwellest within the dark clouds, wielding still
    The flashing stroke of lightning, save, we pray,
    Thy children from this boundless misery.
    Scatter, O Father, the darkness from their souls,
    Grant them to find true understanding
    On which relying thou justly rulest all---
    While we, thus honoured, in turn will honour thee,
    Hymning thy works forever, as is meet
    For mortals while no greater right
    Belongs even to the gods than evermore
    Justly to praise the universal law!” [Cleanthes (c. 3rd century BCE)]

    For if one only grants us, at the outset, the deistic concept of a first
    being as a necessary hypothesis (as does Hume in his Dialogues in the
    person of Philo as opposed to Cleanthes [c.330-c.230] who was a Greek
    Stoic philosopher and followed of Zeno, the founder of the school of
    Stoicism. We have only fragments of the fifty works ascribed to
    Cleanthes, the largest fragment being the Hymn to Zeus), which is a
    concept in which one thinks the first being by means of ontological
    predicates alone, of substance, cause, etc. (something that one must do,
    since reason, being driven in the sensible world solely by conditions
    that are always again conditioned, cannot have any satisfaction at all
    without this being done, and something that one very well can do without falling into that anthropomorphism which transfers predicates from the
    sensible world onto a being wholly distinct from the world, since the predicates listed here are mere categories, which cannot indeed provide
    any determinate concept of that being, but which, for that very reason,
    do not provide a concept of it that is limited to the conditions of sensibility) – then nothing can keep us from predicating of this being a causality through reason with respect to the world, and thus from
    crossing over to theism, but without our being compelled to attribute
    this reason to that being in itself, as a property inhering in it. For, concerning the first point, the only possible way to compel the use of
    reason in the sensible world (with respect to all possible experience)
    into the most thorough- going harmony with itself is to assume, in turn,
    a supreme reason as a cause of all connections in the world; such a
    principle must be thoroughly advantageous to reason and can nowhere harm
    it in its use in nature.

    Regarding the second point, however, reason is not thereby transposed as
    a property onto the first being in itself, but only onto the relation of
    that being to the sensible world, and therefore anthropomorphism is
    completely avoided. For here only the cause of the rational form found everywhere in the world is considered, and the supreme being, insofar as
    it contains the basis of this rational form of the world, is indeed
    ascribed reason, but only by analogy, i.e., insofar as this expression signifies only the relation that the highest cause (which is unknown to
    us) has to the world, in order to determine everything in it with the
    highest degree of conformity to reason. We thereby avoid using the
    property of reason in order to think God, but instead think the world
    through it in the manner necessary to have the greatest possible use of
    reason with respect to the world in accordance with a principle. We
    thereby admit that the supreme being, as to what it may be in itself, is
    for us wholly inscrutable and is even unthinkable by us in a determinate manner; and we are thereby prevented from making any transcendent use of
    the concepts that we have of reason as an efficient cause (through
    willing) in order to determine the divine nature through properties that
    are in any case always borrowed only from human nature, and so from
    losing ourselves in crude or *FANATICAL* concepts, and, on the other
    hand, we are also prevented from swamping the contemplation of the world
    with hyperphysical modes of explanation according to concepts of human
    reason we have transposed onto God, and so from diverting this
    contemplation from its true vocation, according to which it is supposed
    to be a study of mere nature through reason, and not an audacious
    derivation of the appearances of nature from a supreme reason. The
    expression suitable to our weak concepts will be: that we think the
    world as if it derives from a supreme reason, as regards its existence
    and inner determination; whereby we in part cognize the constitution
    belonging to it (the world) itself, without presuming to want to
    determine that of its cause in itself, and, on the other hand, we in
    part posit the basis of this constitution (the rational form of the
    world) in the relation of the highest cause to the world, not finding
    the world by itself sufficient thereto.

    HIS HONOUR MIGHT WELL BE GRIEVED THAT THE ACTIONS IN SUPERSEDING AS INVALIDATING OF THOSE LETTERS PATENT which I have taken independently
    from the COURT has simply taken advantage of the COURT's naivety as the impertinence that HIS HONOUR IS IGNORANT in having no conception that
    someone greater than he is standing before him. That I achieved great
    things today in relation to MATTERS previously placed before the COURT
    as an accountability made of others such that 1.2 billion ROMAN
    CATHOLICS (ie. More than 40% of the world's Catholics live in Latin
    America - but Africa has seen the biggest growth in Catholic
    congregations in recent years) will not be able to CELEBRATE EASTER with
    any clear conscience because *I* *HAVE* *STOLEN* *THEIR* *THUNDER* *AND*
    *THEY* *CAN'T* *GET* *IT* *BACK*." [EXCERPT FROM COURT NOTE OF 1040
    HOURS ON 3 APRIL 2019 RELATING TO COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBERS:
    AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202]

    YOUTUBE: "Whatever It Takes (Imagine Dragons)"

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOsM-DYAEhY>

    In Greek mythology, it was Prometheus (Greek: Προμηθεύς possibly meaning
    "forethought") as the Titan, culture hero, and trickster figure who is
    credited with the creation of man from clay, and who *DEFIES* *THE*
    *GODS* *BY* *STEALING* *FIRE* and giving it to humanity, an act that
    enabled progress and civilisation. Prometheus is known for his
    intelligence and as a champion of mankind and also seen as the author of
    the human arts and sciences generally.

    FORETHOUGHT (BEFORE TIME)@[
    Π, {@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80)},
    ρ, {@2: Sup: 18 (#98); Ego: 19 (#99)},
    ο, {@3: Sup: 7 (#105); Ego: 70 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18})},
    μ, {@4: Sup: 47 (#152); Ego: 40 (#209)},
    η, {@5: Sup: 55 (#207); Ego: 8 (#217)},
    θ, {@6: Sup: 64 (#271: KANT"S IDEA ON *GENERAL* *QUESTION* *OF* *THE* *PROLEGOMENA*: *IS* *METAPHYSICS* *POSSIBLE* *AT* *ALL*?); Ego: 9 (#226)},
    ε, {@7: Sup: 69 (#340); Ego: 5 (#231 - *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*)},
    υ, {@8: Sup: 64 (#404); Ego: 76 (#307)},
    ς] {@9: Sup: 21 (#425); Ego: 38 (#345)},

    In another myth, Prometheus establishes the form of animal sacrifice
    practiced in ancient Greek religion. Evidence of a cult to Prometheus
    himself is not widespread. He was a focus of religious activity mainly
    at Athens, where he was linked to Athena and Hephaestus, other Greek
    deities of creative skills and *TECHNOLOGY*. [Ref: Wikipedia
    2019:Prometheus]

    In this way the difficulties that appear to oppose theism disappear, in
    that to Hume’s principle, not to drive the use of reason dogmatically
    beyond the field of all possible experience, we conjoin another
    principle that Hume completely overlooked, namely: *NOT* *TO* *LOOK*
    *UPON* *THE* *FIELD* *OF* *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *AS* *SOMETHING*
    *THAT* *BOUNDS* *ITSELF* *IN* *THE* *EYES* *OF* *OUR* *REASON*. A
    critique of reason indicates the true middle way between the dogmatism
    that Hume fought and the skepticism he wanted to introduce instead – a
    middle way that, unlike other middle ways, which we are advised to
    determine for ourselves as it were mechanically (something from one
    side, and something from the other), and by which no one is taught any
    better, is one, rather, that can be determined precisely, according to principles." [Pages 109-110]

    Nous: #36
    Time: 01:40 hrs
    Date: 2019.4.15
    Torah:

    Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
    Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
    I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
    young shoot, Discovering

    #260 CE

    Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH {#324
    / #326}

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:8,nous:36&lexicon:H776>

    .jackNote@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 36 [Date: 2019.4.15, Time: 01:40
    hrs, Super: #325 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
    I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
    young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #367 / #36 -
    Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile
    Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot,
    Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]

    H776@{
       @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
       @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
       @3: Sup: 37 (#79); Ego: 1 (#37),
       @4: Sup: 75 (#154); Ego: 38 (#75),
       @5: Sup: 3 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 9 (#84 - I AM NOT
    A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
       @6: Sup: 36 (#193); Ego: 33 (#117),
       Male: #193; Feme: #117
    } // #367

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #291 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

    THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
    at Elephantine; I am not rapacious.

        #VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
        #TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
        #POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
        #TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
        #CANON: #102

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
       @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
       @2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
       @3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
       @4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
       Male: #76; Feme: #102
    } // #102

    #367 as [#6, #30, #1, #200, #90, #600] = ʼerets (H776): {UMBRA: #3 as
    #291 % #41 = #4} 1) land, earth; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed
    to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
    1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
    inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
    1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
    soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) space or distance
    of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain country;
    1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost wholly
    late in usage); 1e1) lands, countries; i) often in contrast to Canaan;

    BINOMIAL APPARATUS {#36}:
    @1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
    @5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
    #65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
    #175 - *MARRIAGE*

    "ANYONE WHO FOR FALSE REASONS OF MERCY DEVIATES FROM THIS CLEAR
    PRINCIPLE IS AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, WILLINGLY {H7521:
    ratsah / accept: #273} OR UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273;
    H4784: marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE
    DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: (7 JUNE
    1942) @235, page #519]

    In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of PERENNIALISM having by the immateriality of its STASIS which defines a SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances have a
    predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of narcissistic self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed
    dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the
    mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic elements expressed therein
    and perhaps not realising that it is also subject to the @205 -
    PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE DIGNITY ROYAL
    (LETTERS PATENT)} and @82 / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (SECTION IX)
    in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS METHODOLOGY which itself
    conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC
    PRINCIPLE that are encapsulated by the @164 / #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF
    MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW.

    "I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE* *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL},
    *NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 - *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE}
    wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY*
    *FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or poorer, in sickness
    and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do we part, today I
    pledge my faithfulness."

    H376@{
       @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
       @2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
       @3: Sup: 81 (#142); Ego: 50 (#81),
       @4: Sup: 57 (#199); Ego: 57 (#138),
       @5: Sup: 67 (#266); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
       Male: #266; Feme: #148
    } // #391

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #311 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
    Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

    THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
    I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

        #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
        #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
        #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
        #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
        #CANON: #181

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
       @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
       @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
       @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
       @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
    WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
       Male: #98; Feme: #181
    } // #181

    #391 as [#30, #1, #50, #300, #10] = ʼîysh (H376): {UMBRA: #0 as #311 %
    #41 = #24} 1) man; 1a) man, male (in contrast to woman, female); 1b)
    husband; 1c) human being, person (in contrast to God); 1d) servant; 1e) mankind; 1f) champion; 1g) great man; 2) whosoever; 3) each (adjective);

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H376>

    H802@{
       @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
       @2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
       @3: Sup: 56 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 57 (#137),
       @4: Sup: 66 (#232); Ego: 10 (#147),
       Male: #232; Feme: #147
    } // #390

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #306 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

    THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
    Block; I commit not adultery with another's wife.

        #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
        #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
        #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
        #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
        #CANON: #180

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
       @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
       @2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
       @3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
       @4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
    ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
       Male: #135; Feme: #180
    } // #180

    #390 as [#30, #50, #300, #10] = ʼishshâh (H802): {UMBRA: #0 as #306 %
    #41 = #19} 1) woman, wife, female; 1a) woman (opposite of man); 1b) wife
    (woman married to a man); 1c) female (of animals); 1d) each, every
    (pronoun);

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H802>

    SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
    AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
    BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273
    -SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
    GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
    PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11
    SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR
    ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF
    NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT
    THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."

    What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
    systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
    world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
    framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
    you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
    which you won’t negotiate.

    AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
        C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
        O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
        R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
    *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
    INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
    HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
        A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
        L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
    PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
    (#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>

    Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
    or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
    the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
    supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our “cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
    at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
    through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
    people. There are more than 6 billion people in the world today, and
    though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have
    identified only eight thus far.

    Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
    express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
    as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
    raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
    alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
    stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
    ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
    can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
    Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
    Review: 27th April 2000]

    Accordingly we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF
    JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY
    FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER:

    + 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
    DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
    33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
    *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

    + 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
    - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

    + 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
    *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

    + 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
    *FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
    3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
    INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}

    @1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
    EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
    *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*].

    #71 #1 #11
    #61 #81 #21
    #51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE

    #205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
    #164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)

    #41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
    #82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
    #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
    #164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY)
    #205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
    #246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
    #287 - MANIFESTING NORM (COVET NOT)

    According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
    concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
    that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
    WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
    that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

    @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {

    HOMOIOS
    HETEROS
    KABBALAH
    AS DEFINED

    } ...

    @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 - CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...

    #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE SABBATH]) ...

        45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
        68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]

    #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
    HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

        84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
        86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
        102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
        104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
        115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

    #65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
    NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...

        130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
        139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
        140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
        146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
        148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
        150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
        156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
        157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
    DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
        158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
        161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]

    #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
    AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

        166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
        168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
        169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
        171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
        173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
        175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
        177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
        180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
        181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
    - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
        182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dolf@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 17 03:16:29 2019
    XPost: soc.culture.pacific-island, alt.culture.african, alt.fan.countries.ghana XPost: alt.politics.africa

    -- THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BREXIT AS SAPIENT ECONOMY

    (c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 15 April, 2019

    FRANCE24 (ENGLISH) @ 1814 HOURS ON 13 APRIL 2019: “COULD MACRON AND
    BREXIT MAKE PARIS THE CAPITAL OF EUROPEAN TECH?

    Shortly after his election in May 2017, President Macron said he wanted
    France itself “to think and move like a start-up” – a vision of the country’s digital future that is gaining traction as Britain wrestles
    with BREXIT.

    French President Emmanuel Macron’s vow to make France a ‘start-up
    nation’ amid the uncertainty over BREXITIS raising the question of
    whether Paris could supplant London as the capital of European tech.

    Since his election, Macron has wooed *TECHNOLOGY* entrepreneurs with a
    string of initiatives in the form of lavish tax breaks, subsides, and
    credits for research. In March 2018, he promised to invest €1.5 billion
    into artificial intelligence research through 2022.

    Some of these initiatives, in addition to Macron’s dynamism, have lured British tech companies who are looking to gain a foothold in Europe."

    <https://www.france24.com/en/20190413-france-paris-macron-brexit-tech-capital-european-station-f>

    MARTIN DAVIES: “Time to stop BREXIT before more jobs, businesses and hardworking EU citizens abandon the U.K. for good.”

    DOLF BOEK: “But only Britain has the means to define the Sovereign /
    Autonomy dynamic which a sapient economy requires.

    And their political opportunism are no different to Mr Macron’s in that
    any viable political life requires a favourably motivated constituency otherwise how will they retain office.”

    DAVID NICOL: “Time for the losers to accept democracy.”

    STEPHAN GON: “David, it’s about economy this time, you reflect the
    innate ignorance of the bulk of BREXITERS, now you go back reading more
    lies from the side of that bus."

    KURT SHUBERT: “Dolf any business relationship requires working with your partners & biggest customers. The best deal the UK can have and still
    retain *X* amount of autonomy is to remain a part of the EU.”

    DOLF BOEK: “Kurt, I have made a further statement given such incapacity
    to comprehend that the microcosm as the trinomial metastasised
    conception of state being sovereign / autonomy dynamic must be
    understood before the binomial stasis of macroeconomic interoperability
    can occur and the later which is Mr Macron’s expertise.”

    STEPHAN GON: “Dolf that’s the least productive copied /pasted piece of
    text I’ve read this week.”

    DOLF BOEK: “Stephan, you are a simple life entity (not even capable of understanding my own valid informal research on Critique of Pure Reason)
    but I am sapient which is given to rationality so don’t subject me to
    your strictures of incompressibility which is a perverse narcissistic characteristic of self entitlement which you have ...

    One doesn’t answer a fool in relation to the foundation of state
    especially when like you they have violated our BOER / ANZAC tradition...

    LEST WE FORGET”

    JONATHAN PHILLIPS: “Stephan, its not, and never has been 'about the economy'.. its about making our own decisions, and not bankrolling the 'pipe-dreams' of others...”

    — HELL’S CLAMOUR —

    “OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
    PARIS IS BURNING.
    AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
    HELL HAS YEARNING.
    FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
    A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46 (#358)} FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”

    IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA @268: “Judgments of experience
    are always synthetic. For it would be absurd to base an analytic
    judgment on experience, since I do not at all need to go beyond my
    concept in order to formulate the judgment and therefore have no need
    for any testimony from experience. That a body is extended, is a
    proposition that stands certain a priori, and not a judgment of experience.

    For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my judgment already in the concept, from which I merely extract the predicate in
    accordance with the principle of #312 - *CONTRADICTION*, and by this
    means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity of the
    judgment, which experience could never teach me. [pages 17-18]

    IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #58 - POLITICAL REVERSAL, ADAPTATION TO CHANGE AS IDEA @358: “This type of cognition is cognition according to analogy, which surely does not signify, as the word is
    usually taken, an imperfect similarity between two things, but rather a
    perfect similarity between two relations in wholly dissimilar things.

    Such is an analogy between the legal relation of human actions and the mechanical relation of moving forces: I can never do anything to another without giving him a right to do the same to me under the same
    conditions; just as a body cannot act on another body with its motive
    force without thereby causing the other body to react just as much on
    it. Right and motive force are here completely dissimilar things, but in
    their relation there is nonetheless complete similarity. By means of
    such an analogy I can therefore provide a concept of a relation to
    things that are absolutely unknown to me. E.g., THE PROMOTION OF THE
    HAPPINESS OF THE CHILDREN = A IS TO THE LOVE OF THE PARENTS = B AS THE
    WELFARE OF HUMANKIND = C IS TO THE UNKNOWN IN GOD = *X*, WHICH WE CALL
    LOVE: not as if this unknown had the least similarity with any human inclination, but because we can posit the relation between God’s love
    and the world to be similar to that which things in the world have to
    one another. But here the concept of the relation is a mere category,
    namely the concept of cause, which has nothing to do with sensibility.

    By means of this analogy there still remains a concept of the supreme
    being sufficiently determinate for us, though we have omitted everything
    that could have determined this concept unconditionally and in itself;
    for we determine the concept only with respect to the world and hence
    with respect to us, and we have no need of more. The attacks that Hume
    makes against those who want to determine this concept absolutely –
    since they borrow the materials for this determination from themselves
    and from the world – do not touch us; he also cannot reproach us that
    nothing whatsoever would remain for us if objective anthropomorphism
    were subtracted from the concept of the supreme being.

    — HYMN TO ZEUS —

    “Most glorious of immortals, Zeus
    The many named, almighty evermore,
    Nature's great Sovereign, ruling all by law
    Hail to thee! On thee 'tis meet and right

    That mortals everywhere should call.
    From thee was our begetting; ours alone
    Of all that live and move upon the earth
    The lot to bear God's likeness.
    Thee will I ever chant, thy power praise!

    For thee this whole vast cosmos, wheeling round
    The earth, obeys, and where thou leadest
    It follows, ruled willingly by thee.
    In thy unconquerable hands thou holdest fast,
    Ready prepared, that two-timed flaming blast,
    The ever-living thunderbolt:
    Nature's own stroke brings all things to their end.
    By it thou guidest aright the sense instinct
    Which spreads through all things, mingled even
    With stars in heaven, the great and small --
    Thou who art King supreme for evermore!

    Naught upon earth is wrought in thy despite, O God.
    Nor in the ethereal sphere aloft which ever winds
    About its pole, nor in the sea -- save only what
    The wicked work, in their strange madness,
    Yet even so, thou knowest to make the crooked straight.
    Prune all excess, give order to the orderless,
    For unto thee the unloved still is lovely--
    And thus in one all things are harmonized,
    The evil with the good, that so one Word
    Should be in all things everlastingly.

    One Word--which evermore the wicked flee!
    Ill-fated, hungering to possess the good
    They have no vision of God's universal law,
    Nor will they hear, though if obedient in mind
    They might obtain a noble life, true wealth.
    Instead they rush unthinking after ill:
    Some with a shameless zeal for fame,
    Others pursuing gain, disorderly;
    Still others folly, or pleasures of the flesh.
    [But evils are their lot] and other times
    Bring other harvests, all unsought--
    For all their great desire, its opposite!

    But, Zeus, thou giver of every gift,
    Who dwellest within the dark clouds, wielding still
    The flashing stroke of lightning, save, we pray,
    Thy children from this boundless misery.
    Scatter, O Father, the darkness from their souls,
    Grant them to find true understanding
    On which relying thou justly rulest all---
    While we, thus honoured, in turn will honour thee,
    Hymning thy works forever, as is meet
    For mortals while no greater right
    Belongs even to the gods than evermore
    Justly to praise the universal law!” [Cleanthes (c. 3rd century BCE)]

    For if one only grants us, at the outset, the deistic concept of a first
    being as a necessary hypothesis (as does Hume in his Dialogues in the
    person of Philo as opposed to Cleanthes [c.330-c.230] who was a Greek
    Stoic philosopher and followed of Zeno, the founder of the school of
    Stoicism. We have only fragments of the fifty works ascribed to
    Cleanthes, the largest fragment being the Hymn to Zeus), which is a
    concept in which one thinks the first being by means of ontological
    predicates alone, of substance, cause, etc. (something that one must do,
    since reason, being driven in the sensible world solely by conditions
    that are always again conditioned, cannot have any satisfaction at all
    without this being done, and something that one very well can do without falling into that anthropomorphism which transfers predicates from the
    sensible world onto a being wholly distinct from the world, since the predicates listed here are mere categories, which cannot indeed provide
    any determinate concept of that being, but which, for that very reason,
    do not provide a concept of it that is limited to the conditions of sensibility) – then nothing can keep us from predicating of this being a causality through reason with respect to the world, and thus from
    crossing over to theism, but without our being compelled to attribute
    this reason to that being in itself, as a property inhering in it. For, concerning the first point, the only possible way to compel the use of
    reason in the sensible world (with respect to all possible experience)
    into the most thorough- going harmony with itself is to assume, in turn,
    a supreme reason as a cause of all connections in the world; such a
    principle must be thoroughly advantageous to reason and can nowhere harm
    it in its use in nature.

    Regarding the second point, however, reason is not thereby transposed as
    a property onto the first being in itself, but only onto the relation of
    that being to the sensible world, and therefore anthropomorphism is
    completely avoided. For here only the cause of the rational form found everywhere in the world is considered, and the supreme being, insofar as
    it contains the basis of this rational form of the world, is indeed
    ascribed reason, but only by analogy, i.e., insofar as this expression signifies only the relation that the highest cause (which is unknown to
    us) has to the world, in order to determine everything in it with the
    highest degree of conformity to reason. We thereby avoid using the
    property of reason in order to think God, but instead think the world
    through it in the manner necessary to have the greatest possible use of
    reason with respect to the world in accordance with a principle. We
    thereby admit that the supreme being, as to what it may be in itself, is
    for us wholly inscrutable and is even unthinkable by us in a determinate manner; and we are thereby prevented from making any transcendent use of
    the concepts that we have of reason as an efficient cause (through
    willing) in order to determine the divine nature through properties that
    are in any case always borrowed only from human nature, and so from
    losing ourselves in crude or *FANATICAL* concepts, and, on the other
    hand, we are also prevented from swamping the contemplation of the world
    with hyperphysical modes of explanation according to concepts of human
    reason we have transposed onto God, and so from diverting this
    contemplation from its true vocation, according to which it is supposed
    to be a study of mere nature through reason, and not an audacious
    derivation of the appearances of nature from a supreme reason. The
    expression suitable to our weak concepts will be: that we think the
    world as if it derives from a supreme reason, as regards its existence
    and inner determination; whereby we in part cognize the constitution
    belonging to it (the world) itself, without presuming to want to
    determine that of its cause in itself, and, on the other hand, we in
    part posit the basis of this constitution (the rational form of the
    world) in the relation of the highest cause to the world, not finding
    the world by itself sufficient thereto.

    HIS HONOUR MIGHT WELL BE GRIEVED THAT THE ACTIONS IN SUPERSEDING AS INVALIDATING OF THOSE LETTERS PATENT which I have taken independently
    from the COURT has simply taken advantage of the COURT's naivety as the impertinence that HIS HONOUR IS IGNORANT in having no conception that
    someone greater than he is standing before him. That I achieved great
    things today in relation to MATTERS previously placed before the COURT
    as an accountability made of others such that 1.2 billion ROMAN
    CATHOLICS (ie. More than 40% of the world's Catholics live in Latin
    America - but Africa has seen the biggest growth in Catholic
    congregations in recent years) will not be able to CELEBRATE EASTER with
    any clear conscience because *I* *HAVE* *STOLEN* *THEIR* *THUNDER* *AND*
    *THEY* *CAN'T* *GET* *IT* *BACK*." [EXCERPT FROM COURT NOTE OF 1040
    HOURS ON 3 APRIL 2019 RELATING TO COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBERS:
    AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202]

    YOUTUBE: "Whatever It Takes (Imagine Dragons)"

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOsM-DYAEhY>

    In Greek mythology, it was Prometheus (Greek: Προμηθεύς possibly meaning
    "forethought") as the Titan, culture hero, and trickster figure who is
    credited with the creation of man from clay, and who *DEFIES* *THE*
    *GODS* *BY* *STEALING* *FIRE* and giving it to humanity, an act that
    enabled progress and civilisation. Prometheus is known for his
    intelligence and as a champion of mankind and also seen as the author of
    the human arts and sciences generally.

    FORETHOUGHT (BEFORE TIME)@[
    Π, {@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80)},
    ρ, {@2: Sup: 18 (#98); Ego: 19 (#99)},
    ο, {@3: Sup: 7 (#105); Ego: 70 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18})},
    μ, {@4: Sup: 47 (#152); Ego: 40 (#209)},
    η, {@5: Sup: 55 (#207); Ego: 8 (#217)},
    θ, {@6: Sup: 64 (#271: KANT"S IDEA ON *GENERAL* *QUESTION* *OF* *THE* *PROLEGOMENA*: *IS* *METAPHYSICS* *POSSIBLE* *AT* *ALL*?); Ego: 9 (#226)},
    ε, {@7: Sup: 69 (#340); Ego: 5 (#231 - *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*)},
    υ, {@8: Sup: 64 (#404); Ego: 76 (#307)},
    ς] {@9: Sup: 21 (#425); Ego: 38 (#345)},

    In another myth, Prometheus establishes the form of animal sacrifice
    practiced in ancient Greek religion. Evidence of a cult to Prometheus
    himself is not widespread. He was a focus of religious activity mainly
    at Athens, where he was linked to Athena and Hephaestus, other Greek
    deities of creative skills and *TECHNOLOGY*. [Ref: Wikipedia
    2019:Prometheus]

    In this way the difficulties that appear to oppose theism disappear, in
    that to Hume’s principle, not to drive the use of reason dogmatically
    beyond the field of all possible experience, we conjoin another
    principle that Hume completely overlooked, namely: *NOT* *TO* *LOOK*
    *UPON* *THE* *FIELD* *OF* *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *AS* *SOMETHING*
    *THAT* *BOUNDS* *ITSELF* *IN* *THE* *EYES* *OF* *OUR* *REASON*. A
    critique of reason indicates the true middle way between the dogmatism
    that Hume fought and the skepticism he wanted to introduce instead – a
    middle way that, unlike other middle ways, which we are advised to
    determine for ourselves as it were mechanically (something from one
    side, and something from the other), and by which no one is taught any
    better, is one, rather, that can be determined precisely, according to principles." [Pages 109-110]

    Nous: #36
    Time: 01:40 hrs
    Date: 2019.4.15
    Torah:

    Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
    Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
    I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
    young shoot, Discovering

    #260 CE

    Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH {#324
    / #326}

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:8,nous:36&lexicon:H776>

    .jackNote@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 36 [Date: 2019.4.15, Time: 01:40
    hrs, Super: #325 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
    I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
    young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #367 / #36 -
    Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile
    Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot,
    Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]

    H776@{
    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
    @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
    @3: Sup: 37 (#79); Ego: 1 (#37),
    @4: Sup: 75 (#154); Ego: 38 (#75),
    @5: Sup: 3 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
    STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 9 (#84 - I AM NOT
    A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
    @6: Sup: 36 (#193); Ego: 33 (#117),
    Male: #193; Feme: #117
    } // #367

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #291 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

    THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
    at Elephantine; I am not rapacious.

    #VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
    #TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
    #POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
    #TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
    #CANON: #102

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
    @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
    @2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
    @3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
    @4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
    Male: #76; Feme: #102
    } // #102

    #367 as [#6, #30, #1, #200, #90, #600] = ʼerets (H776): {UMBRA: #3 as
    #291 % #41 = #4} 1) land, earth; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed
    to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
    1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
    inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
    1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
    soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) space or distance
    of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain country;
    1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost wholly
    late in usage); 1e1) lands, countries; i) often in contrast to Canaan;

    BINOMIAL APPARATUS {#36}:
    @1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
    @5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
    #65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
    #175 - *MARRIAGE*

    BINOMIAL APPARATUS {#36}:
    @1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
    @5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
    #65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
    #175 - *MARRIAGE*

    THESE ARE MATTERS OF FACT ALREADY BEFORE THE COUNTY COURT IN APPEAL
    CASES AP-18-0609 and AP-18-0775 which have a directions hearing on 20
    January 2020 and were conveyed prior to the maelstrom event as emailed
    advice made to state / federal attorney generals upon 15 April 2019 as
    grounds for 36 news media not being subjected to contempt of court charges.

    Jesus Christ’s Crown of Thorns saved in NOTRE DAME MAELSTROM after firefighters and police form human chain

    #1828 - Crown of Thorns is the perfect accompaniment for #1827 -
    Eucharist and Saint Andrews #371 - 30 November (Knights Templar
    International) Cause Célèbre #364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 days against our Commonwealth of States and it’s BOER / ANZAC heritage.

    DOLF @ 0416 HOURS ON 17 MARCH 2019: "Of course we are still to
    incorporate such narrative within our next COUNTY COURT submission but
    the resolution is (if my memory serves me correctly): #341 - 30 DECEMBER
    v's #329 - 1 JANUARY CONFORMING TO IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) /
    #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and FIDELITY OF OATHS TO #231 -
    JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / #541 - *THICK* *CLOUD* being a supranatural / paranormal consequence as interventions which occurred (temporal adjust
    for daylight saving differs in Queensland and thus was before 1100
    hours) on 11 November 2018 as World War One Centennial Commemorations.

    In summary speaking to NATIONAL PARTY parliamentarians immediately
    thereafter:

    DANNY O’BRIEN: as removal of 7 July 2017 proroguing order given the
    expulsion of neo-nazis from party membership.

    DARREN CHESTER: discussion of his participation at inauguration of the Cherished Mother Saint Patrick’s Day Statue, Remembrance Day
    Intervention whilst he attended memorial events in France as minister
    for ANZAC Commemorations assisting the Prime Minister and his knowledge
    of the Oak Tree plaque in Victoria Park dedicated to Duke of
    Gloucester’s planting on 27 October 1934 accompanying his dedication of
    the Sydney Hyde Park War Memorial same year.

    We were satisfied that involvement by the MINISTERS OF PARLIAMENT were a natural prerogative reliably and honourably made in support of
    constituents and did not involve maleficence on their part—the result of
    the elections saw the Nationals receive a vote increase which was a
    significant #312 - *CONTRADICTION* of the trend within the Saturday 24
    NOVEMBER 2018 Victorian state election of the 59th Parliament of
    Victoria. Where all 88 seats in the Legislative Assembly and all 40
    seats in the Legislative Council were up for election.

    DOLF: "Do be very careful when you read it though because it is Neural Linguistic Programming written (for anti-terrorism purposes) to a
    TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON which is entirely
    supranatural being outside temporality or immediate sense perception and
    should you have abnormal physiological effects of sensory overload such
    as anxiety--THEN LAY DOWN...

    I'm still incorporating narrative of an earlier syncretism involving an intervention over TRUMPS failed cemetery visit and prior to as
    intersecting with MACRON's NATIONALISM v's PATRIOTISM speech at WORLD
    WAR I CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS within FRANCE ...

    — TIME DIDN'T DENY —

    “YE BE NOT
    FORGOTTEN.
    AS THEY ROT {ie. US corruption on the part of officials}.
    SOIL SODDEN.

    WE REMEMBER.
    OF VALOUR BORN.
    FAITHFUL FOREVER.
    ER EVE NOR MORN.”

    [ANZAC Centennial 25 April 2018]

    <http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Time%20Didn't%20Deny%2020180425.pdf>

    NICK MILLER (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD) @ 2332 HOURS ON 11 NOVEMBER 2018: "NATIONALISM IS A BETRAYAL OF PATRIOTISM: FRANCE'S PRESIDENT LECTURES
    THE POWERFUL: (PARIS) By the grave of an unknown soldier, under
    Napoleon’s grand arch, at the centenary of the end of a great, terrible
    war, France’s president lectured the powerful.

    The first world war’s lesson and legacy were clear, he said. Peace is
    hard won and is fragile.

    A century ago, after such loss, the world took a path of humiliation and revenge and it fuelled the rise of nationalism and totalitarianism.

    His audience, metres away, included presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir
    Putin, and Recep Erdogan.

    *NATIONALISM* *IS* *A* *BETRAYAL* *OF* *PATRIOTISM*, Emmanuel Macron
    declared. A withdrawal into isolationism would be “a grave error that
    future generations would very rightly make us responsible for”.

    “The old demons are rising again, ready to wreak chaos and death,” he warned. “History sometimes threatens to take its sinister course again.”

    He wanted the 70 world leaders assembled there - including Australian Governor-General Peter Cosgrove, seated just next to Putin - to renew a
    pledge to honour the dead and “place peace above all else”.

    Trump listened, leaning forward, his eyes narrow. He was one of the last
    to applaud as the speech ended.

    — ALL HAIL THE POTUS —
    [Written 1124 hours (AEDT) 11 November 2018]

    “WITH TRUMP YOU KNOW.
    IT’S EITHER *FIRE* OR FURY.
    OR *WATER* LOGGED.

    THE *WIND* DOTH BLOW.
    YET *SOIL* MAKES MERRY.
    BY FIELDS LEFT UNTROD.”

    JUST A FEW WEEKS AGO, AT A RALLY IN TEXAS, HE HAD SAID “*YOU* *KNOW*
    *WHAT* *I* *AM*? *I’M* *A* *NATIONALIST*. *OK*? *I’M* *A*
    *NATIONALIST*…. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*”.

    — CONFEDERATE APPETITE —

    “THE KERNEL LOVES TO BBQ.
    AFTER EVERY BIG SLAUGHTER.
    THE FRENZIED LUSTFUL CAUSE.
    WHETHER IT’S BAR FLYS OR JEW.
    ANYONES SON OR DAUGHTER.
    THERE IS NO TIME FOR PAUSE.”

    WHAT IS A TROD?
    A Trod in the west of England is a straight line or fairy path in the
    grass of a field with a different shade of green from the rest. Great
    danger was associated with using these paths when a supernatural
    procession was using them. Fairy rings have certain elements in common
    with this phenomenon. People with rheumatism {ANAGRAM: Mithraeums as *Mithraism*} sought relief by walking along these paths; however animals
    were thought to actively avoid them. [<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trod>]

    — BLINKERED DEVOTIONS —

    “IF I KNOW GOOD.
    AND I KNOW EVIL.
    BE IT UNDERSTOOD.
    I AIN’T NO DEVIL.
    WELL KISS MY RING.
    YOU ROTTEN SOD.
    ‘N MOUTH MY DING.
    YOU AIN’T NO GOD.”

    A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {ie. we have already noted #419 -
    SLAUGHTER / #728 (2 x #273 + #182 - *LIMIT*) - REACTANCE EVENTS and
    VALUE STATEMENTS} is an artefact of both Islam and Roman Catholicism
    which are reliant upon Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as NUMBER then
    they are *MITHRAS* {ie. @1 - RETAINED / @5 - CENTRE OF VALUE, #15
    (#260) ... #369 (#15)} and not Christian {ie. a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x n] NECESSITY WITH IT”} ...

    An example of REACTANCE EVENTS (Sphere of Action) and VALUE STATEMENTS (Universe of Discourse) could be simply: “They mingle not with their
    laughing comrades again; They sit no more at familiar tables of home;
    They have no lot in our labour of the day-time; They sleep beyond
    England's foam.” [ODE to the Fallen]

    All it then requires is a theft of my Intellectual Property which they
    have had within their possession from at least prior to 28 JULY 2011
    whereby the nous #75 is then applied to a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
    upon 11 November 2018 and voila ...

    What advice then or as counsel of the church (consilia evangelica) would
    they give on various *MORAL* issues as their claim to a higher obedience
    than the natural law (ie. on the basis of Pythagorean HETEROS THEORY OF
    NUMBER) which is required by others who follow the counsels to perform
    acts of merit and who are thereby given a *GREATER* certainty of
    salvation than those who merely follow the commands of the law. And
    what then is the character of the forma corporis of your archetypal son
    of man {ie. HEAVEN (H27) EARTH (H9) = MAN (H36) as #666} in relation to
    your representations (conscientia erronea: erring conscience of the
    reprobate *MIND* which misidentifies the good) as improper claims made
    of Jesus {He is saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign;
    one chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}, in being then
    the full embodiment of this Divine *MIND* as an AUTONOMY OF WILL?

    As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
    formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
    (materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
    generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
    potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then
    the *MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea,
    shape or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei essentialis sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of righteousness, holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God
    in which man was originally created).

    Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis
    for all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a
    thing including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as
    the integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the
    innate *MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis:

    7: {

    5: {1: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 5}, nous: [1]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
    PROTOTYPE

    .jackNote@zen: 4, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 15 [Date: 2018.12.25, Time: 1816
    hrs, Super: #359 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
    I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy, Ego: #397 / #15 -
    Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner
    Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 - Centre]

    7: {48: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 7}, nous: [48]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS PROTOTYPE

    .jackNote@zen: 4, row: 3, col: 1, nous: 67 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
    Super: #408 / #63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching:
    H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra:
    62 - Doubt, Ego: #279 / #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading (conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual]

    },

    8: {
    4: {49: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 4}, nous: [49]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS PROTOTYPE

    .jackNote@zen: 4, row: 4, col: 3, nous: 18 [Date: 2018.7.26, Time: 0805
    hrs, Super: #395 / #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
    H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
    Tetra: 33 - Closeness, Ego: #421 / #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts,
    Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight]

    9: {24: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 9}, nous: [24]} // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
    PROTOTYPE

    .jackNote@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 1 [Date: 2018.4.3, Time: 0055
    hrs, Super: #516 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 -
    Sinking, Ego: #331 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
    I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy]

    },

    9: {
    6: {25: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 6}, nous: [25]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS PROTOTYPE

    .jackNote@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 6, nous: 12 [Date: 2018.4.8, Time: 0115
    hrs, Super: #427 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
    Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #366 / #12 -
    Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
    - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention]

    8: {72: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 8}, nous: [72]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS PROTOTYPE

    .jackNote@zen: 4, row: 6, col: 8, nous: 75 [Date: 2018.11.11 *AS*
    *REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY*, Time: 1515 hrs, Super: #367 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 - Sinking, Ego: #352 / #75 - Destructive Envy, Harmed Through Greed; I-Ching: H52 - Restraint,
    Inaction, Bound, Keeping still, mountain, Stilling; Tetra: 72 - Hardness]

    }

    Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as
    being primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding
    which grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously
    acts according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and
    the natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God
    upon the *MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason
    in its encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature
    (foedus naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature
    and its capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)