XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.abortion
XPost: alt.atheism

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:46:59 GMT, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
wrote:

On 9 Sep 2005 19:41:01 -0700,
"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" parroted another writer's
ignorant HATE-swill by spewing it herein --

http://www.conservativetruth.org/article.php?id=331

"The Old Morality Still Matters"

By Dave Racer, www.daveracer.com

June 26, 2002

LOL!!! The last remaining KKK members regard segregation to
have been the "old morality," and think that it mattered. That's
and example of how bone-DUMB *that* premise is. (This response
is directed both to the parrot, and to Dave Racer, to whom it is
being forwarded.

Ask any homosexual activist...

...or any fair-minded and egalitarian HETEROsexual **ally** of the
gay community in their reasonable quest for *non*-discrimination and >**equal** rights... who, interestingly, outnumber the gays, themeselves,
by a ratio of 9-to-1...

...whether it is any business of yours with whom they choose to
have sex, especially when that choice means someone of the same
gender. The answer will be unanimous: this is private, consensual
and none of your business!

Precisely! but trust ignorant LOSERS like *you* to be mindless
busybodies with no worthwhile lives. Pathetic.

Of course, homosexual activist go beyond even this.

Just as the freedom-fighters known as Civil Rights activists did,
40 years ago, before the loathsome agendas of the bigots of *those*
dark days became very properly extinct.

The homosexual activist claims a right to openly live out their
sexual [orientation] and we must accept it.

ROTFL!!!! People like the idiot who wrote this bogus nonsense
are total fools. That's like "accepting" that a person has blue eyes
or is left handed. TRIVIAL. And it takes a truly **mindless** loser to
be upset over such trivial things.

Anti-gay-rights jerks have one thing in common (besides their
obvious bigotry and ignorance): they are society's **laughingstocks**
in the eyes of intelligent and SENSIBLE people.

They argue that what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms is
none of our business, ...

And GEE!!! guess what??? They are RIGHT!!

That is ABSOLUTELY no one else's business. NONE, whatsoever.

(And the bigots wonder why **sensible** and egalitarian people are
laughing so hard at them!)

...and neither is it our business if they hold hands in public.

CLUE, loser. That's what people who love each other DO.
Regardless of gender composition. If that upsets you, you need to
become a hermit. Or apply for residency in the nearest cackle
factory. Because you are crazier than a barn owl!

The old morality, based on the Seventh Commandment, "Thou
shalt not commit adultery," argues that at least to some extent, the
privacy of the bedroom is everyone's concern.

(1) You obviously are too dumb to know what adultery is.

(2) You also seem to be stupid enough to think that ANY
verse in the Bible even *exists* which authorizes any
person to act as an ENFORCER of its precepts.
(There are probably several excellent reasons for that.
Not the least of which is the fact that most loons like
you don't know what many of those precepts even
ARE. And to make matters worse, listen to cult
leaders who keep conjuring up bogus ones of their
own.) The Bible appointed NO Gestapo.

(3) The privacy of any person's bedroom is of NO
concern whatsoever to any *other* person in
possession of a working mind -- unless that person
happens to be there by invitation of the first person.

(4) Not that it makes any difference, considering the
points above, but there also is the fact that the
Bible is **meaningless** to one out of ever 6 people
in the USA. (And even fewer in Europe.) (So *those*
people have even MORE reason to regard you as
the laughingstock that you are.)

Yet most of us would agree that if homosexuals kept their
sexuality in the bedroom, we would likely look the other way --
unless they took captive one of our children.

(If they ever did that to the writer of this article, they'd probably
be doing his kids a favor.)

And -- NAW -- that's a lie. Because I'm betting that you
can't cite so much as one single instance of gay people perfor-
ming a sex act in public. (And even if you could, it's likely that
there would be MORE **heterosexuals** that had done so... so
what could your point possibly be?)

As a matter of public policy, the old morality...

("Old morality." ROTFL!!!! That would be the "old busybodyism,"
and you are still afflicted by it.)

...relegated homosexuality to the closet.

And segregationists relegated blacks to substandard and
scarce facilities. Same stupidity.

Kinsey, in his highly structured lie...

LOL!!!! Perhaps, since lies are something you clearly are
an expert at delivering.

...told us that 10 percent of the male population was homosexual.

It's probably not. But it is VERY likely to be 5%. And that means
boneheaded, bigoted, and hateful you -- are willing to discriminate
against FIFTEEN MILLION Americans -- over a mere **triviality**!

(From here on, it went downhill FAST, folks, and the author
of this article made a TOTAL bigoted fool of himself. Rather than
waste more time debunking his mindless hate-swill, feel free to see
it for yourself (if you're into masochism) at the link provided at the
top of this post.)

(This article was written 3 years ago. I wonder if its writer has
outgrown any of his ludicrous bigotry since then?)

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>

Your wisdom is missed, Craig.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)