• -- VOX POPULI VOX DEI (2/2)

    From dolf@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 19 18:48:38 2019
    [continued from previous message]

    is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish Exodus from Egypt and 40 years
    sojourn = 50J."

    {
    "derivation" : "multiple of H702 (אַרְבַּע);",
    "pron" : "ar-baw-eem'",
    "outline" : {

    "@1" : "forty"
    },
    "kjv_def" : "-forty.",
    "lemma" : "אַרְבָּעִים",
    "frequency" : 135,
    "strongs_def" : "forty",
    "xlit" : "ʼarbâʻîym",
    "strongs" : "H705",
    "umbra" : {
    "323" : [1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600]
    },
    "gematria" : {
    "323" : {
    "0" : [1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 40],
    "1" : [1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600]
    },
    "325" : [2, 1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600],
    "328" : [5, 1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600],
    "329" : [6, 1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600],
    "343" : [20, 1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600],
    "883" : [1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600]
    }
    }

    {
    "derivation" : "from H142 (אָדַר) and H4428 (מֶלֶךְ); splendor of
    (the) king;",
    "pron" : "ad-ram-meh'-lek",
    "outline" : {

    "@0" : "Adrammelech = 'honour of the king'",
    "@1" : "or 'Adar is prince'",
    "@2" : "or 'Adar is Counsellor, Decider'",
    "@3" : "an idol or god of the Sepharvites, introduced to Israel
    by Shalmaneser the fifth",
    "@4" : "the son and murderer of Sennacherib"
    },
    "kjv_def" : "Adrammelech.",
    "lemma" : "אֲדְרַמֶּלֶךְ",
    "frequency" : 3,
    "strongs_def" : "Adrammelek, the name of an Assyrian idol, also of
    a son of Sennacherib",
    "xlit" : "ʼĂdrammelek",
    "strongs" : "H152",
    "umbra" : {
    "295" : [1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 500]
    },
    "gematria" : {
    "295" : [1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 20],
    "301" : [6, 1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 500],
    "325" : [30, 1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 500],
    "775" : [1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 500]
    }
    }

    {
    "derivation" : "patrial from H795 (אַשְׁדּוֹד);",
    "pron" : "ash-do-dee'",
    "outline" : {

    "@0" : "Ashdodites = 'I will spoil'",
    "@1" : "an inhabitant of Ashdod"
    },
    "kjv_def" : "Ashdodites, of Ashdod.",
    "lemma" : "אַשְׁדּוֹדִי",
    "frequency" : 5,
    "strongs_def" : "an Ashdodite (often collectively) or inhabitant of Asdod",
    "xlit" : "ʼAshdôwdîy",
    "strongs" : "H796",
    "umbra" : {
    "325" : [1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10]
    },
    "gematria" : {
    "325" : [1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10],
    "336" : [6, 5, 1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10],
    "365" : [1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10, 600],
    "370" : [5, 1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10, 600],
    "376" : [6, 5, 1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10, 600],
    "731" : [1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10, 6, 400]
    }
    }

    I must confess that I didn't just accidentally stumble upon the word
    #325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
    #10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = paradidomi (G3860), in that I was
    asleep and the thought "*THIS* *IS* *THE* *WORD* *WHICH* *YOU* *OUGHT*
    *TO* *LOOK* *AT*" entering into my mind was sufficient to CAUSE ME TO
    THEN AWAKEN and when I latter checked the word it was SO."

    -- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

    "OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
    BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
    BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
    INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
    HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
    ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
    - *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

    KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
    IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
    This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
    *CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
    *AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

    FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely, according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
    time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
    Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

    #1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

    }, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

    #175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
    {#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
    *NOT* *STEAL*

    #1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
    eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
    *TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
    MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

    After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
    *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
    IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
    EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
    *MARRIAGE*: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
    expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
    TETRACTYS

    ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
    2019: "My point is that the racist bigots will do their best to ignore
    and pull down the highest, supreme talent, as giving publicity to the
    highest talent which does not conform to their biases, will make them
    feel small.

    Which is a pain, for the arts and sciences. My other inventions and
    works are also ignored, by the ruling racist bigots, and that is not
    good for the progress of humanity.

    Of course, this is just their style, to intimidate. Being highly
    theistic, I smile at such efforts on their part, for following my
    Catholic schooling I dedicate all my deeds to God.

    Well, God in my case means the Hindu Gods and Goddesses mainly, but I am
    also very grateful to *JEHOVAH* and *BUNJIL* {

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/weddingblues.jpg>

    [IMAGE: Within Australian Aboriginal mythology, Bunjil is a creator
    deity, culture hero and ancestral being, often depicted as a
    wedge-tailed eagle [as similar modal depiction within the Egyptian Book
    of the Dead]. In the Kulin nation in central Victoria he was regarded as
    one of two moiety ancestors, the other being Waa the crow. Bunjil has
    two wives and a son, Binbeal the rainbow. His brother is Palian the bat]

    } for looking after my family and I so well.

    ÖRDÖG (DEVIL@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
    "Are you pissed at OZ for whatever (real or imaginary) personal
    grievances you have had?"

    ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
    2019: "No, I understand their limitations, so what is the point of
    getting pissed. I am well off after all, despite all machinations.

    When one dedicates all one's works to God, then one can only admire the
    way God works: so fine, so admirable! Now that is not something the
    racist bigots will understand, for they are limited by their narrow
    sectarian visions. But, they too are a part of God, not that they will understand this, so they have to play their parts in the great game around."

    ÖRDÖG (DEVIL@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
    "Believe me (or don't) there are many ways to discuss topics in
    newsgroups. Some are OK some ain't. Madly trolling, ignorant comments, drifting off topic, whinging/whining, posting disgruntled rants and
    alienating regular posters in your targeted newsgroup is definitely not
    the right way to do it."

    ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
    2019: "In this case I was simply saying that India does produce things
    the world steals without giving due credit. Such as my works, and there
    have been plenty more over the ages and even now. The racist bigots will ignore, then steal the new ideas from the poor thirdworlders struggling
    for sheer existence."

    ÖRDÖG (DEVIL@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
    "But feel free to try Facebook or some similar crazy social media
    instead of Usenet!"

    ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
    2019: "I do use facebook. That is useful, for I can put in photos and
    videos.

    <https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359>

    Usenet is useful as it is a very open medium where assertions are
    forcefully challenged. So new ideas placed on usenet, such as my
    inventions of the Hydrogen Transmission Network, or the Internal Force
    Engine, are open to criticism. It is a test by fire, very useful. A good
    way to improve, by absorbing the criticism from the public. Also it
    ensures that my new inventions remain my property, at least in the moral
    sense if not legal sense by patenting. That is some satisfaction.
    Publicity thus has its uses. Indians at least will remember my works,
    this I believe. Certainly some Australians as well, meaning my family
    and my friends here."

    <http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

    [IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

    1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
    genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

    As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
    (ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
    is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
    reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
    Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

    2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
    and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

    ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
    FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

    "AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
    JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

    #I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
    #N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
    Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
    #R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
    THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
    IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
    #I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
    which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

    INRI@{
    @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
    @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
    @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
    @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
    Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
    ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
    } // #270

    THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
    CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
    AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
    THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
    ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

    MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-WANKER@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
    HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved signature of Arindam Banerjee

    [Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the f@ck,
    who really knows)]"

    HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
    MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
    SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

    'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
    walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
    compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
    one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
    of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
    have so many qualities that make us like them.

    Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
    *STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
    ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

    }, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
    our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
    affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
    unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
    answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
    but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
    question.

    — EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

    "OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
    THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
    ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
    FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

    TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
    VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
    WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
    *SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
    *UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
    *ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
    ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

    YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

    <https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

    SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
    the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
    thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
    otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
    which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
    of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
    in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
    Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
    solving the second main question.

    "THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
    SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART; SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

    AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
    HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
    JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

    PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
    HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
    CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
    PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

    WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
    SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
    AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

    THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
    BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
    THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
    HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

    THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
    THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

    JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
    WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

    "ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
    LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
    ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

    G3860@{
       @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
       @2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
       @3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
    {%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
       @4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
    1 (#101),
       @5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
       @6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
       @7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
       @8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
       @9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
       @10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
       Male: #470; Feme: #240
    }

    #325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
    #10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
    #4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 =
    #8} 1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
    power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
    permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
    of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
    treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
    deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
    by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

    } UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

    } THAT DELIVERED {

    G3860@{
       @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
       @2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
       @3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
    {%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
       @4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
       @5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
       @6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
       @7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
       @8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
       @9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
       @10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
       Male: #334; Feme: #258
    } // #582

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
    The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

    THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
    *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

        #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
        #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
    between word and deed.
        #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
        #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
        #CANON: #200

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
       @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
       @2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
       @3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
       @4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
    PROPERTY {%8}),
       Male: #143; Feme: #200
    } // #200

    #582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
    (G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
    commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
    one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
    to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
    to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
    to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
    rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
    allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

    } ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

    AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
    OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
    WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
    (KJV)]

    But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
    possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
    that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
    answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
    and for all thinking of objects:

    Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
    given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
    rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
    necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

    6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry {*VISHNU*}
    7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction {*SHIVA*}
    8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression {*BRAHMA*}

    YOUTUBE: “DOCTOR WHO (PARTING OF WAYS)”

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ThpkjDgdvY>

    WHAT THEN IS A-U-M?

    “FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
    INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

    Whom is holier than thou?

    There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
    through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
    i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
    priori at the basis of its possibility.

    The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
    universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
    the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
    the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
    we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
    necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
    constitutes the possibility of experience.

    Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
    entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
    a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
    and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
    from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
    as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
    the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
    understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
    acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
    cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
    nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
    from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
    from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
    one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
    can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
    experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the understanding; so only the second remains.

    We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
    which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
    pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

    CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
    #451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

    DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH* DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
    DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
    *NOT* *KILL*
    DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST* *AUTONOMY*
    DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
    {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
    DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
    Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
    DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
    {#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

    Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
    *CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
    *UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
    respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
    the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
    *RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
    (without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
    sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
    understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
    nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
    *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
    #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
    TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

    ARINDAM BANERJEE (BANERJEEADDA1234@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
    FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
    on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

    MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-WANKER@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
    HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
    right from the beginning!

    Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

    How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
    Usenet output?

    Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
    run its course."

    LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (SCREAMING.NUTBAG@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
    ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
    shite, didn't you know?."

    - dolf

    The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
    the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
    Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

    Initial Post: 18 February 2019


    --


    YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

    SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
    {#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
    harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

    Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
    a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

    <http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

    SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

    Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
    assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
    (translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
    of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

    It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
    = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
    64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
    than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
    macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
    canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

    The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
    a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

    That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

    After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
    expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
    TETRAD/TETRACTYS

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)