XPost: soc.culture.portugal, alt.fan.countries.poland, alt.culture.italy
XPost: soc.culture.swiss

ATTN: FRANCESCO DE FERRARI
AMP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
33 Alfred Street
Sydney NSW 2000

29 JUNE 2020 - *DRAFT* *IN* *PROGRESS*

.jackNote@zen: 3, row: 3, col: 6, nous: 72 [DATE: 2020.6.29, SUPER: #337
/ #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Closeness,
Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33 -
CLOSENESS (MI), EGO: #307 / #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear;
I-Ching: H39 - Adversity, Obstacles, Limping, Obstruction, Afoot; Tetra:
79 - DIFFICULTIES (NAN)]

SUBJECT: #419 - SLAUGHTERHOUSE CORPORATE ACTION PERTAINING TO CLAIM
NUMBER XXXXXX / MEMBER NUMBER XXXXX,XXXX AS GROUP SALARY CONTINUANCE /
GROUP LIFE INSURANCE BY UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT AND CRIME AGAINST
HUMANITY BEING MATTERS SUMMARISED OF 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 AS SUBMISSION TO
THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION

PROLEGOMENA
That my last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE" failed on
the basis that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it to be)
being entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from MEDIA
REPORTS OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL
ASSISTING THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND
ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG'.

Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL (AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the INSURER.

This was then the only cause for an EXTRAORDINARY DIRECTIONS HEARING OF ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LIST A500/2000 on the date 7 December 2001, before
visually impaired adjudicator Deputy President Cate MacKenzie.

With specific reference to my current CASE MANAGER PRAB SINGH whom by
email @ 1256 HOURS ON 5 AUGUST 2019, improperly demanded: "My name is
Prab and I wanted to take the opportunity to introduce myself as your
case manager for your income protection claim. Please kindly provide me
with a name and contact details of one of your treating doctors.

This is to confirm that you are receiving the support you require while
on claim. Appreciate your assistance with this."

AGAINST WHOM I HAVE REASONABLY MADE OBJECTION UPON THE FOLLOWING
CULTURAL EXCLUSION GROUNDS:
FIRSTLY with due respect as a person of INDIAN HERITAGE you do have any compliance to the TRINOMIAL AND ONTIC FIRST PRINCIPLES OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH since your heritage is ONLY a binomial stasis encapsulation
of mind have insufficient cultural sensibility to responsibly and
without prejudice manage my legal claim over unconscionable conduct by
the insurer in the [totalitarian mis]management of my claim which as per
CLAIMS TO ASSESSORS @ 1134 HOURS ON 21 JULY 2018 REQUIRES NO FURTHER
MEDICAL EVIDENCE DUE TO VARIATION OF THE INSURANCE CONTRACTUAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

SECONDLY, such a request is an improper and forceful demand as
irrationality being duress which is a BREACH OF PREVIOUSLY ADVISED
AMENDED terms of the INSURANCE POLICY related to CLAIM xxxxxxxx.

The conduct [in which you have engaged] under the contract is unlawful
and a demand is now once again made on termination of the contract and
damages paid.

Has subsequently shown a contempt towards voluminous submissions made in substantiation of the claim for termination and that CRIMINAL
PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND
ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG' being wilful breaches of CONSTITUTIONAL
FIRST PRINCIPLES and RIGHTS TO CITIZENSHIP.

Being habitual conduct by INDIAN NATIONALS whom improperly think (ie.
since they have a contempt for the DEFENDER OF THE FAITH and EMPRESS OF
INDIA) the foundational CONSTITUTIONAL principles of #27 - *DUTIES* and
#68 - *RIGHTS* of citizenship do not apply to them such that they can
impose themselves upon our constitutional rights by their self
entitlement, as irrespective of any objection.

SEE APPENDIX '123' for statement on immigrants must exhibit a determined mindfulness as RESPECTFUL LOYALTY to #322 - DEMOCRATIC BELIEFS, #RIGHTS
and LIBERTIES of Queen Victoria's Letters Patent dated 29 October 1900.

SEE APPENDIX '164' for a technological innovation on #322 - DEMOCRATIC principles by ONTIC PAIRINGS and DEME designations as MALE and FEME with special note to the #45 - METHODOLOGY related to the @1 - SOVEREIGN'S
LAWFUL #237 - USE OF FORCE TELEOLOGICAL FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 -
FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE}) with relativity to
Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena 1783 / Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787):

const KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
1: {idea: [265, 266], page: [15, 15]},
2: {idea: [267, 268, 269, 272, 273, 274], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21]},
3: {idea: [270], page: [22]},
6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 -
NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE})
9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
18: {idea: [298], page: [50]},
27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
}

Since after 24 years informal philological research, I now have
something of tangibility which is subject to peer-review as an
intellectual property being a trinomial theoretical mathematical
noumenon that in my opinion is capable of determining MENS REA / ACTUS
REUS from the #1092 cycle as temporal heuristic which is directly
relevant to two telephone calls that the INSURER'S CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL misrepresented on 7 December 2001 as what ought to be regarded as “communication between lawyers (as to matters of proceeding by a self representing party) being conduct bound with “honour of oath” as
protected by the notion of legal privilege between lawyers.”

SEE APPENDIX '205' on the EXISTENTIAL CONUNDRUM where given the temporal
extent of ANZAC JINGOISTIC REPUBLICANISM as improper pre CENTENNIAL 2018
WREATH placement upon 8 JUNE 2017 / 2020 is there any jurisprudent means
for a determination made of the #15 - MENS REA (#164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY) relative to the #34 - ACTUS REUS (#205 - PRINCIPLE OF
PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE) for any vEVENT?

Once the seven day timeframe for last grace is granted to the INSURER, I
am then going to direct the complaint to the Financial Services
Complaints Authority.

MATERIAL DETAILS OF THE COMPLAINT SUMMARISED OF 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 AS SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION
On page 26 of our finalised submission, we expressed a caution in
relation to historical PAPAL BULLS and the newly formed KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR's, that in whatever circumstance, it is capable of being hosted
upon the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as it's mechanism for
delivery and staging which then becomes an acute and risky precipice consideration that is accorded entirely by my Intellectual Property and
thusly my reasonable objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS /
FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 - YEAR OF TARGETING / #33 - #INRI / #65 -
SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 / #288 / #419}
war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOIOS basis
to our Commonwealth's Governance which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation into a nation.

EMAIL TO FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION @ 0820 HOURS ON 19 JULY
2018: "VCAT TRANSCRIPT ON MATERIAL DETAILS SUMMARY OVER A COMPLAINT TO
THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AGAINST AMP'S 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH IS 'UNLAWFUL AND ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG' AS
PERJURY AT VCAT ON 7 DECEMBER 2001 ASSOCIATED TO A SALARY CONTINUATION
POLICY:

TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS

FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:

Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell’s
submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
telephone hook-up.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?

Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by

MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
determine how best to deal with it.

In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.

MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
presenting myself by way of telephone today.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?

MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
of those

THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?

MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
matter it ought to be on evidence.

MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]

THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape

MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.

TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.

You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE (or #339 - SEPULCHRE / CENOTAPH)."

COMMENT ON MESSAGE ONE:

Just a comment on CULTURAL SENSIBILITY as the consequence upon the
AUSTRALIAN MUTUAL PROVIDENT (AMP) SOCIETY founding in 1849 given
the temporal extent of ANZAC JINGOISTIC REPUBLICANISM as improper pre CENTENNIAL 2018 WREATH placement upon 8 JUNE 2017 / 2020...

That ANZAC JINGOISTIC REPUBLICANISM is an unlawful attempt to align
itself with the ROMAN CATHOLIC ECCLESIASTICAL #1827 - CALENDAR /
EUCHARIST {ie. 4 x #364 days + #371 - SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} which
is a foreign power and an attempt to evade {ie. 3 JANUARY + 77 days = 21
MARCH + 33 days = 23 APRIL} a fascist equivalent identity.

The essential temporal characteristic {ie. RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT
CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS
YEAR} of the telephone message ONE is the contradiction of this by an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY claim to an #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC
PRINCIPLE (ie. associated to #1092 cycle as temporal heuristic for determining MENS REA / ACTUS REUS}:

WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x #364 + #182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001

IT IS SIMPLY NOT POSSIBLE FOR AMP INSURANCE TO CLAIM ANY FIDELITY TO
EITHER QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT OR AN ANZAC HERITAGE CONFORMING
TO SUCH PRINCIPLES AND WE NOTE THERE HAS BEEN NO MORAL OUTRAGE
against ANZAC JINGOISTIC REPUBLICANISM being an unlawful attempt to
align itself with the ROMAN CATHOLIC ECCLESIASTICAL #1827 - CALENDAR / EUCHARIST

SEE APPENDIX '246' ON THY WILL BE DONE ON EARTH {#27 - DUTIES = +0 +9
+18} AS IT IS IN HEAVEN {#81 - SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE = +0
+27 - DUTIES +54 - UNITY}

This sacred Jewish emblem is acknowledged within Pythagoras's DECADE as
having a symbolic association to the HEXAD (#6) as "HEALTH: A TRIPLE
TRIANGLE WHICH BEING ALTERNATIVELY CONJOINED WITHIN ITSELF ✡️
CONSTITUTES A FIGURE OF FIVE LINES; THEY USE IT AS A SYMBOL TO THOSE OF
THEIR OWN SECT AND CALLED IT HEALTH" as having an equivalent reliance
upon a faux-wisdom conveying a dependancy on PYTHAGORAS HETEROS THEORY
OF NUMBER



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

MIND (DAO: VIRTUE): #1 {#80 - LABOURING (CH'IN)} + #2 {#27 - DUTIES
(SHIH)} = #3 <-- *TRINOMIAL* *CONCEPTION* *OF* #NUMBER

SCIENCE (DAO: TOOLS): #3 {#36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG)} + #4 {#47 - PATTERN
(WEN)} = #7 <-- *BOER* *WAR* *MEMORIAL* DAY 31 MAY

OPINION (DAO: POSITION): #5 {#41 - RESPONSE (YING)} + #6 {#52 - MEASURE
(TU)} = #11 <-- THE QUESTION IS APRIORITY OF THE NATURAL ORDER [#47,
#41] TO CALENDAR [#41, #47]

SENSE (DAO: TIME): #7 {#55 - DEMINISHMENT (CHIEN)} + #8 {#61 -
EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)} = #15

<— #36 - CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY / ANTHROPOLOGY / CHRISTOLOGY

PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NUMBER FRAUD (FOUNDATIONS TO ROMAN CATHOLIC
*HETEROSEXUAL* *MARRIAGE* *DOGMAS* / WESTERN PHILOSOPHY) HAVING A
TRINOMIAL NUMBER DEPENDANCY: Furthermore, the judicative power in things
are Four: *MIND*, *SCIENCE*, *OPINION*, and *SENSE*; for all beings are dijudicated either by *MIND*, or *SCIENCE*, or *OPINION*, or *SENSE*:

For which reason PYTHAGORAS AFFIRMED, THE *SOUL* OF MAN TO CONSIST OF A
TETRAD.

Finally, the TETRAD connects all beings, of Elements (ie. FIRE-AIR-WATER-EARTH), *NUMBERS*, *SEASONS* *OF* *THE* *YEAR*, *CIVIL* *SOCIETY*; neither can we name any thing, which depends not on the
Tetractys, as its *ROOT* and *PRINCIPLE*; for it is, as we said, the
make and cause of all things; intelligible God, Author of Celestial and sensible Good.  The knowledge of these was delivered to the Pythagoreans
by Pythagoras himself. [Pythagoras His Life and Teachings, 1687 edition
of the History of Philosophy, p 527]



<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

----------

TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if
you are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past treatment of me that as of the new #713 - *YEAR* we will not be having
another contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and
we will are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you
are going to have to recognise the fact that you are a #288 - *BLASPHEMER*.

Your religious context has no continuing validity and since I am able to rationally prove that with a mathematical model..... you are going to understand how forceful and hard metaphysics is."

COMMENT ON MESSAGE TWO:

From page 65 of our submission made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: During this week of 19 MARCH 2018 I went to ANZ Bank and
asked in relation to the Royal Commission into the Financial Services /
Banking System whether they were aware of the #72 - Anthropic Prototype
and the binomial as HETEROS basis to our system of coinage {#224} and
that this has a metaphysical stratum which exists beneath their 64 bit
sapient understanding of #NUMBER itself and for which we have an #288 -
UMBRA by which one can determine #FRAUD from transactional meta-data.

He was not so aware.

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL
SOCIALISM): One day the English will realise that they've nothing to
gain in Europe... *IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they can't let *INDIA* go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold
on to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's
a matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point
of view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE
ON RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS*
*SHED* *HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD*
*HAVE* *A* *MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT*
*THE* *SCENES* *OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*.
[HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION*
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)




<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

FROM OUR STATEMENT FOR A CONTEST HEARING OF 26 MARCH 2020 AS CASE NUMBER K12507785 IN RELATION TO AN APPLICATION TO HAVE ORDERS EXTENDED
PERTAINING TO CASE NUMBER: H13018534 BY ALLEGED BREACHES AND RELEVANT TO
CASE NUMBER L10519861 LISTED FOR MENTION HEARING ON 17 MARCH 2018.

That the statement from the RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE COMPLAINT firstly
has recourse to argumentation which is entirely reliant upon
EPISTEMOLOGICAL NIHILISM AS IMPROBABLE TRUTHS and METAPHYSICAL NIHILISM
AS CONCRETE OBJECTS AND PHYSICAL CONSTRUCTS conveyed by a reference to
#224 - *COINS* as being irrelevant to my alleged sphere of action
pertaining to any culpability over a deliberate breach of any
substantiated grounds for ORDERS, but entirely consistent to the premise
of METAPHYSICAL NIHILISM AS CONCRETE OBJECTS RELATING TO THE ROMAN
GOVERNANCE BINOMIAL STASIS PROTOTYPE #EIGHT AND ITS MECHANISM OF #261 - BINOMIAL CLAMPING (#141 + #120):

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dókimos (G1384): {UMBRA:
#61 as #414 - METASIZING PRINCIPLE % #41 = #4} 1) *ACCEPTED*,
*PARTICULARLY* *OF* *COINS* *AND* *MONEY*; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable;

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 - *MEMORIAL* *REMEMBRANCE*
as [#8, #200, #80] /
#364 as [#10, #8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] /
#728 - *REACTANCE* *EVENTS* as [#8, #200, #80, #400, #600] = châraph
(H2778): {UMBRA: #12 as #288 % #41 = #1} 1) to reproach, taunt,
*BLASPHEME*, defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 1a) (Qal) to reproach; 1b)
(Piel) to reproach, defy, taunt; 2) (Qal) to winter, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, be betrothed;

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

Thereby associated to the ANZAC DAY / REMEMBRANCE #288 - MEMORIAL
slander made of 10 NOVEMBER 2016 by the RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) PRESIDENT as also characteristically purveying a NIHILISTIC IMPETUS in accordance with their #371 - SAINT ANDREWS #473 - CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
DEPLOYING THE ROMAN GOVERNANCE BINOMIAL STASIS PROTOTYPE #ONE (#297) AS
MODUS OPERANDI OF #261 - BINOMIAL CLAMPING.

MEDIA REPORTS (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD) AS RECENTLY AS 2031 HOURS ON 28
JUNE 2020: "SPECIAL FORCES CHIEF ACKNOWLEDGES WAR CRIMES, BLAMES 'POOR
MORAL LEADERSHIP':

The senior army officer in charge of Australia’s special forces has
admitted some elite soldiers committed war crimes in Afghanistan in an extraordinary confidential briefing to dozens of troops at SAS headquarters.

The senior army officer in charge of Australia’s special forces has
admitted some elite soldiers committed war crimes in Afghanistan and
blamed the atrocities on “poor moral leadership” in an extraordinary confidential briefing to dozens of troops at SAS headquarters.

In a private briefing delivered in late March, Major-General Adam
Findlay also made the stunning admission that war crimes may have been
covered up and that Australia’s special forces will take a decade to
recover from the long running investigation overseen by senior NSW judge
Paul Brereton.

Multiple sources with knowledge of the meeting revealed General Findlay,
the Australian Special Operations Commander, briefed dozens of Special
Air Service Regiment (SAS) soldiers at Perth’s Campbell Barracks,
telling them, “Brereton knows more about this command than anybody.” General Findlay said Justice Brereton had interviewed hundreds of SAS
personnel under oath and he had a “very strong evidential basis of what
is fact”.

“There are guys who criminally did something. But can you tell me, why
was that?” General Findlay asked the soldiers present at the briefing.
He then said Justice Brereton had identified “trigger pullers” and
“names that come up beyond the trigger pullers” who enabled war crimes. General Findlay went on to blame the war crimes on what he described as
“one common cause”.

“It is poor leadership,” he said. “In fact, it is poor moral leadership.” [<https://www.smh.com.au/national/special-forces-chief-acknowledges-war-crimes-blames-poor-moral-leadership-20200628-p556z6.html>]

AS AN ONTOLOGICAL PACIFIST GIVING MATERIAL SUPPORT IN PROMULGATING
THROUGHOUT THE ISLAMIC WORLD SUCH FACTUAL STATEMENTS ON THE PROVEN
CLAIM OF PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NUMBER FRAUD (METALOGIC AUTONOMOUS
DELIMITER FOUNDATIONS TO ROMAN CATHOLIC HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE DOGMAS /
WESTERN PHILOSOPHY) HAVING A TRINOMIAL NUMBER DEPENDANCY.

AND BY ITS LOGICAL FALLACY DUE TO A RECURSIVE #36 - NATURE WE SIMILARLY UNDERMINE THE BINOMIAL NUMBER FOUNDATIONS OF ISLAMIC BELIEF AND THEY
LOSE THE WILL TO FIGHT

The purpose for taking a calendar approach to obtain access to the
temporal heuristic, is simply because the time of day is designated by 4
x 5 minutes x 72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 1440 minutes whereas the day of
year segmentation has been known for several millennia to be a NORMA
OBLIGANS constituted by:

4 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #12 TO TETRA: #80 - LABOURING (CH'IN)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #44 TO TETRA: #27 - DUTIES (SHIH) <-- *TRINOMIAL* *CONCEPTION* *OF* #NUMBER

6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #30 TO TETRA: #36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG) <-- *BOER*
*WAR* *MEMORIAL* DAY 31 MAY

6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #77 TO TETRA: #47 - PATTERN (WEN) <-- THE QUESTION IS APRIORITY OF THE NATURAL ORDER [#47, #41] TO CALENDAR [#41, #47]

6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #42 TO TETRA: #41 - RESPONSE (YING)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #18 TO TETRA: #52 - MEASURE (TU)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #37 TO TETRA: #55 - DEMINISHMENT (CHIEN)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #48 TO TETRA: #61 - EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)

ALL THE REST ARE DESIGNATED BY 5 DAYS...

EARLY NOTIONS OF MING: THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO THE PROBLEM OF FATE
Among modern translators, no consensus exists about the proper
definition of MING; the term is most often rendered as fate or Decree
(as in my own introductory remarks), but it is also translated as
variously as "duty," "destiny," "predestination," "causal connections
and their possibilities," "manifestation of Heaven's will," "the
inevitable," "empirical facts," "created world," "lifespan," "objective circumstances," "circumstances beyond human control," and so on. The
problem is not simply one of translation.

Typically, MING was associated with the king’s decrees of investiture to
his inferiors and with Heaven’s decree to its chief representative, the
king. According to an early Chou formulation, the Decree of Heaven
(T'IEN MING) was a special form of covenant. The covenant essentially stipulated that Heaven agrees to support a certain dynastic line so long
as the throne, in return, promotes the well-being of its subject people.
Four notable features of this covenant coloured all subsequent
discussions of MING:

1) First and foremost, the Decree of Heaven presupposed a strong
connection between Heaven and Man, though the earliest texts are
preoccupied with the “One Man,” the ruler.

"AND SHALL NOT GOD AVENGE HIS OWN ELECT, WHICH CRY DAY AND NIGHT UNTO
HIM, THOUGH HE BEAR LONG WITH THEM? I TELL YOU THAT HE WILL AVENGE THEM SPEEDILY.

YOUTUBE: “LAST TRUMPET - LAST SHOFAR”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3vWj92ZJjk>

NEVERTHELESS WHEN THE SON OF MAN COMETH, SHALL HE FIND FAITH ON THE
EARTH?" [Luke 18:7-8]

2) Second, the Decree of Heaven implied an impartial reward given for
specific acts of "bright virtue."

3) Third, it viewed virtue primarily in terms of obligations to human
society, rather than religious #27 - *DUTIES*.

4) Fourth, the Decree of Heaven promised Heaven’s support to the
recipient(s) for the duration of a fixed (though unspecified) time
period, overlooking possible lapses in virtue that might occur while the covenant
was in force.

All four aspects of the Decree of Heaven covenant (moral unity of
Heaven/Man; reward for virtue; virtue equated with social obligation;
and fixed term of contract) continued to form the core of meaning for
MING over the course of the following several centuries, when the
character MING came to be extended to other contracts between Heaven
(whether seen as supreme god or natural order) and individuals of ever
lower rank—first ministers and aristocrats, and finally commoners.

Nevertheless, the initial formulation of the Decree of Heaven doctrine
became increasingly problematic as the scope of its application
dramatically expanded. For one thing, as soon as ordinary people came to
be credited with individual decrees, numerous objections were raised
about the supposed terms of this unspoken contract, since it was easy to find—and far less dangerous to comment upon—individual cases among the common people in which fate bore no apparent relation to virtue.
Moreover, the easy conflation of the accretion of moral goodness with
the accumulation of material goods appeared problematic, at least to
some. There was also the issue of fairness to be considered if rewards
or punishments were really being visited upon distant descendants.
Before long, a number of key questions relating to MING were put
forward. Behind all of them lay a profound “METAPHYSICAL DOUBT AS TO
WHETHER HEAVEN IS AFTER ALL ON THE SIDE OF HUMAN MORALITY.” [Yang
HSIUNG, The Canon of Supreme Mystery (4 BCE), Michael NYLAN, A
Translation with Commentary of the T'AI HSUAN CHING, pages 35-37]

“AND I WILL PUT ENMITY BETWEEN THEE AND THE WOMAN, AND BETWEEN THY SEED
AND HER SEED; IT SHALL BRUISE THY HEAD, AND THOU SHALT BRUISE HIS HEEL.” [Genesis 3:15 (KJV)]

This is a consideration on the static planetary orbit and an ONTIC
premise: do you know any physics that can elucidate that idea?

The _memeBrain.getVirtualYear() function is a much simpler task because
apart from a leap year consideration and determining the dayofweek for
calendar positioning relativity, the tropical year is a static
proposition which with a suitable vRUDOLPH cycle overflow is then a
maximum of 22 elements:

10 DEC + 22 days = 31 DEC

365 / 366 days

1 JAN + 22 days = 22 JAN

TOTAL BOUNDARY: #410 (#10 x #41 - ONTIC PREMISE) as [#6 - POWERS, #4 - DOMINION, #400] = dâth (H1882): {UMBRA: #0 as #404 % #41 = #35} 1)
decree, law; 1a) a decree (of the king); 1b) law; 1c) *LAW* (*OF* *GOD*);

Regarding the ONTIC trinomial / binomial #NUMBER #246 - intersection on
12 August (366 year) and #111 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL CONCEPTUAL IMPLEMENTATION:

const ONTIC_CYCLE = {

0: {
0: {month: 12, day: 10, zen: 3, row: 7, col: 6, tick: 1035},
1: {month: 12, day: 10, zen: 3, row: 7, col: 6, tick: 1035}
},
41: {
0: {month: 1, day: 20, zen: 5, row: 8, col: 6, tick: 0},
1: {month: 1, day: 20, zen: 5, row: 8, col: 6, tick: 0}
},
82: {
0: {month: 3, day: 2, zen: 2, row: 9, col: 7, tick: 1370},
1: {month: 3, day: 1, zen: 1, row: 9, col: 7, tick: 1365}
},
123: {
0: {month: 4, day: 12, zen: 3, row: 1, col: 7, tick: 95},
1: {month: 4, day: 11, zen: 2, row: 1, col: 7, tick: 90}
},
164: {
0: {month: 5, day: 23, zen: 3, row: 2, col: 7, tick: 255},
1: {month: 5, day: 22, zen: 2, row: 2, col: 7, tick: 250}
},
205: {
0: {month: 7, day: 3, zen: 2, row: 3, col: 7, tick: 410},
1: {month: 7, day: 2, zen: 1, row: 3, col: 7, tick: 405}
},
246 - ANGEL GABRIEL: {
0: {month: 8, day: 13, zen: 1, row: 4, col: 7, tick: 565},
1: {month: 8, day: 12, zen: 6, row: 4, col: 6, tick: 0} <— #111 -
ANTHROPOLOGICAL CONCEPTUAL IMPLEMENTATION
},
287: {
0: {month: 9, day: 23, zen: 6, row: 5, col: 6, tick: 0},
1: {month: 9, day: 22, zen: 5, row: 5, col: 6, tick: 0}
},
328: {
0: {month: 11, day: 3, zen: 1, row: 6, col: 7, tick: 885},
1: {month: 11, day: 2, zen: 5, row: 6, col: 6, tick: 0}
},
369 - WAN WU: {
0: {month: 12, day: 14, zen: 2, row: 7, col: 7, tick: 1050},
1: {month: 12, day: 13, zen: 1, row: 7, col: 7, tick: 1045} <—
#GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE #65 - INNER (NEI) / SOLDIER IS THE SAME LOCUS
FOR THE #4 - DAY DESIGNATION AS A CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE IMPETUS
},

THERE IS BETWEEN THE DATES 12 AND 28 AUGUST DESIGNATION A (CASUS DATAE
LEGIS: #364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW) ARGUMENT AS UNIQUE TORAH PROTOTYPE OCCURRENCE ON 21 AUGUST RELATED TO TRINOMIAL #NUMBER META-DESCRIPTOR
PROTOTYPES BEING THE SCAFFOLDING EXPRESSED WITHIN THE EVENT OF THE
APOSTLE PAUL BEFORE GOVERNOR FELIX WITHIN HEROD'S JUDGEMENT HALL
CAESAREA. [Acts 23:25-35 (KJV)]

410: {
0: {month: 1, day: 24, zen: 4, row: 8, col: 7, tick: 1220},
1: {month: 1, day: 23, zen: 3, row: 8, col: 7, tick: 1215}
}

}

Within Chinese Shamanic {ie. #369 - *WAN* *WU* meaning the myriad of /

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)