@6: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#216); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#145),
@7: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#283); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@8: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#339); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#218),
@9: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#364); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#268),
Male: #364; Feme: #268
} // #268
"And their eyes were opened {#268 as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3,
#70, #50] = dianoigo (G1272): open}, and they knew him; and he vanished-
out of their sight. And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened {#268
as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3, #70, #50] = dianoigo (G1272): open}
to us the scriptures?" [Luke 24:31-32 (KJV)]
"Then opened {#268 as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3, #70, #50] =
dianoigo (G1272): open} he their understanding, that they might
understand the scriptures," [Luke 24:45 (KJV)]
"And a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard us: whose heart the Lord opened
{#268 as [#4, #10, #1, #50, #70, #10, #3, #70, #50] = dianoigo (G1272): open}, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul."
[Acts 16:14 (KJV)]
For that reason all analytic propositions are still a priori judgments
even if their concepts are empirical, as in: *GOLD* is a yellow metal;
for in order to know this, I need no further experience outside my
concept of *GOLD* {ie.
@1 + @41 + @81 + @369 INCLUSIVE OF A COSMOLOGICAL VIEW:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 AS THE WORLDVIEW [#205 / #164] OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT: #71 + #1 + #11 + #21 = @104 - *PRESENTS* / @491 -
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@84 - *GOLD* + @86 + @102 + @104 - *PRESENTS* (DIDOMI: G1325) + @115 - *DIGNITY* *ROYAL*}) *CHIH*
= #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
}, which includes that this body is yellow and a metal; for this
constitutes my very concept, and I did not have to do anything except
analyze it, without looking beyond it to something else.
(c) Synthetic judgments require a principle other than the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as
#310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}
#268 as [#6, #1, #60, #200, #1] = ʼĕçâr (H633): {UMBRA: #261 % #41 =
#15} 1) interdict, decree, decree of restriction;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #261 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre;
THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
appearance in the place of Righteousness; I am not a land-grabber. #VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), daily increasing its
kind. #TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type. #POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but #TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity. #CANON: #146
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{ @1: Sup: 15 - REACH: TA (#15); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#15), @2: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#85); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#70), @3: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#96); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#92), @4: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#146 - I AM NOT A
LAND-GRABBER {%15}), Male: #161; Feme: #146 } // #146
H633@{
@1: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#6); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#6),
@2: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#13); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#7),
@3: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#80); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#67),
@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#105),
@5: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#129); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#106),
Male: #129; Feme: #106
} // #268
"All the presidents of the kingdom, the governors, and the princes, the counsellors, and the captains, have consulted together to establish a
royal statute, and to make a firm decree {#268 as [#6, #1, #60, #200,
#1] = 'ecar (Aramaic) (H633): decree}, that whosoever shall ask a
petition of any God or man for thirty days, save of thee, O king, he
shall be cast into the den of lions." [Daniel 6:7 (KJV)]
There are synthetic judgments a posteriori whose origin is empirical;
but there are also synthetic judgments that are a priori certain and
that arise from pure understanding and reason. Both however agree in
this, that they can by no means arise solely from the principle of
analysis, namely the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100,
#200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*};
they demand yet a completely different principle, though they always
must be derived from some fundamental proposition, whichever it may be,
in accordance with the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100,
#200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}; for nothing can run counter to this principle, even though everything cannot
be derived from it. I shall first classify the synthetic judgments. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @268]
#THREE: [#40, #81 - FOSTERING (YANG), #32, #73, #42, #1, #50, #9, #41] - SYNTHESIS (#123)
[#40, {@1: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40)}
#81, {@2: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#80); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#121)} #32, {@3: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#152); Ego: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG
(#153)}
#73, {@4: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#216); Ego: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#226)}
#42, {@5: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#241); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET:
YING (#268: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 2)}
#1, {@6: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#267: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 2);
Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#269: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 2)}
#50, {@7: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#343: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION
53); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#319: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
SECTION 36)}
#9, {@8: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#347: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 53);
Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#328: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 40)}
#41] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#392); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING
(#369: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)}
1. Judgments of experience are always synthetic. For it would be absurd
to base an analytic judgment on experience, since I do not at all need
to go beyond my concept in order to formulate the judgment and therefore
have no need for any testimony from experience. That a body is extended,
is a proposition that stands certain a priori, and not a judgment of experience.
For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my judgment already in the concept, from which I merely extract the predicate in accordance with the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100,
#200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}, and
by this means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity of
the judgment, which experience could never teach me.
#269 as [#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #10, #1, #50] = hermēneía (G2058): {UMBRA: #219 % #41 = #14} 1) *INTERPRETATION*; 1a) *OF* *WHAT* *HAS*
*BEEN* *SPOKEN* *MORE* *OR* *LESS* *OBSCURELY* *BY* *OTHERS*;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #219 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - Branching Out;
THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at Mabit; I deal not fraudulently. #VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but #TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord. #POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing. #TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love. #CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{ @1: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14), @2: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#82); Ego: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}), @3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#79), @4: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH
(#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}), Male: #220; Feme: #140 } // #140
G2058@{
@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5),
@2: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#29); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#24),
@3: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#93); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#64),
@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#165); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#72),
@5: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#206); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#122),
@6: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#252); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#127),
@7: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#308); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#137),
@8: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#365); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#138),
@9: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#391); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#188),
Male: #391; Feme: #188
} // #269
"To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another
the interpretation {#269 as [#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #10, #1, #50] = hermeneia (G2058): interpretation} of tongues:" [1Corinthians 12:10 (KJV)]
"How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath
a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation {#269 as [#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #10, #1, #50] = hermeneia (G2058): interpretation}. Let all things be done unto
edifying." [1Corinthians 14:26 (KJV)]
2. Mathematical judgments are one and all synthetic. *THIS*
*PROPOSITION* *APPEARS* *TO* *HAVE* *COMPLETELY* *ESCAPED* *THE* *OBSERVATIONS* *OF* *ANALYSTS* *OF* *HUMAN* *REASON* *UP* *TO* *THE* *PRESENT*, *AND* *INDEED* *TO* *BE* *DIRECTLY* *OPPOSED* *TO* *ALL* *OF* *THEIR* *CONJECTURES*, *ALTHOUGH* *IT* *IS* *INCONTROVERTIBLY* *CERTAIN* *AND* *VERY* *IMPORTANT* *IN* *ITS* *CONSEQUENCES*. Because they found
that the inferences of the mathematicians all proceed in accordance with
the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*} (which, by nature,
is required of any apodictic certainty), they were persuaded that the fundamental propositions were also known through the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as
#310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*,
*CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}, in which they were very
mistaken; for a synthetic proposition can of course be discerned in accordance with the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as [#2, #100,
#200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}, but
only insofar as another synthetic proposition is presupposed from which
the first can be deduced, never however in itself.
First of all it must be observed: that properly mathematical
propositions are always a priori and not empirical judgments, because
they carry necessity with them, which cannot be taken from experience.
But if this will not be granted me, very well, I will restrict my
proposition to pure mathematics, the concept of which already conveys
that it contains not empirical but only pure cognition a priori.
One might well at first think: that the proposition 7 {#175} + 5 {#65} =
12 is a purely analytic proposition that follows from the concept of a
sum of seven and five according to the principle of *CONTRADICTION*
{#312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23}
1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}. However, upon closer inspection, one finds that the
concept of the sum of 7 and 5 contains nothing further than the
unification of the two numbers into one, through which by no means is
thought what this single number may be that combines the two. The
concept of twelve is in no way already thought because I merely think to myself this unification of seven and five, and I may analyze my concept
of such a possible sum for as long as may be, still I will not meet with twelve therein. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @269]
#269 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5] = paraphérō (G3911): {UMBRA: #1587 % #41 = #29} 1) to bear to, bring to, put before; 2) to
lead aside from the right course or path, to carry away; 3) to carry
past, lead past; 3a) to cause to pass by, to remove;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #1587 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking / Darkening of the Light, Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;
THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
I am not given to cursing. #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness. #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new. #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old. #CANON: #177
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{ @1: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#29); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#29), @2: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#46); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#98), @3: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#91); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#126), @4: Sup: 15 - REACH: TA (#106); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}), Male: #106; Feme: #177 } // #177
G3911@{
@1: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES
{%9}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#204); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#105),
@5: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#278); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#357); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#160),
@7: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#358); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#163),
@8: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#379); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#183),
@9: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#405); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#188),
Male: #405; Feme: #188
} // #269
"And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take
{#269 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5] = paraphero (G3911):
take} away {#269 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5] =
paraphero (G3911): take} this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will,
but what thou wilt." [Mark 14:36 (KJV)]
"Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove {#269 as [#80, #1, #100, #5,
#50, #5, #3, #20, #5] = paraphero (G3911): take} this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done." [Luke 22:42 (KJV)]
*ONE* *MUST* *GO* *BEYOND* *THESE* *CONCEPTS*, *IN* *MAKING* *USE* *OF*
*THE* *INTUITION* *THAT* *CORRESPONDS* to one of the two, such as one’s five fingers, or (like Segner in his arithmetic) five points, and in
that manner adding the units of the five given in intuition step by step
to the concept of seven. One therefore truly amplifies one’s concept through this proposition 7 {#175} + 5 {#65} = 12 and adds to the first concept a new one that was not thought in it; that is, an arithmetical proposition is always synthetic, which can be seen all the more plainly
in the case of somewhat larger numbers, for it is then clearly evident
that, though we may turn and twist our concept as we like, we could
never find the sum through the mere analysis of our concepts, without
making use of intuition.
Nor is any fundamental proposition of pure geometry analytic. That the straight line between two points is the shortest is a synthetic
proposition. For my concept of the straight contains nothing of
magnitude, but only a quality. The concept of the shortest is therefore wholly an addition and cannot be extracted by any analysis from the
concept of the straight line. *INTUITION* *MUST* *THEREFORE* *BE* *MADE* *USE* *OF* *HERE*, *BY* *MEANS* *OF* *WHICH* *ALONE* *THE* *SYNTHESIS*
*IS* *POSSIBLE*.
#266 as [#40, #70, #6, #50, #50, #10, #600] /
#272 as [#6, #40, #70, #6, #50, #50, #10, #600] = ʻânan (H6049): {UMBRA: #170 % #41 = #6} 1) (Piel) to make appear, produce, *BRING* (*CLOUDS*); 2) (Poel) to practise soothsaying, conjure; 2a) to observe
times, practice soothsaying or spiritism or magic or augury or
witchcraft; 2b) soothsayer, enchanter, sorceress, diviner,
fortuneteller, barbarian, Meonenim (participle);
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #170 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form;
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence;
Tetra: 66 - Departure;
THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain. #VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction. #TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition. #POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent. #TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct. #CANON: #182
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_182@{ @1: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#6); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#6), @2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#58); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#52), @3: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#92); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}), @4: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#112); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#182 - I AM NOT
FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}), Male: #112; Feme: #182 } // #182
H6049@{
@1: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#69); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#110),
@3: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego:
6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#116),
@4: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#108); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@5: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#162); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING:
T'ANG (#216),
@6: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#226); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#226),
@7: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#242); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#259),
Male: #242; Feme: #259
} // #266
H6049@{
@1: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#6); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#6),
@2: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#52); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#46),
@3: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#87); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#116),
@4: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#128); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#122),
@5: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#138); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#172),
@6: Sup: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#198); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#222),
@7: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#268); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#232),
@8: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#290); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#265),
Male: #290; Feme: #265
} // #272
"Therefore hearken not ye to your prophets, nor to your diviners, nor to
your dreamers, nor to your enchanters {#272 as [#6, #40, #70, #6, #50,
#50, #10, #40] = `anan (H6049): observer}, nor to your sorcerers, which
speak unto you, saying, Ye shall not serve the king of Babylon
{incongruity; confusion; mixture}:" [Jeremiah 27:9 (KJV)]
#ONE: [#38 - *IMPETUS* *FOR* *THEFT* *OF* *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY*, #45
- GREATNESS (TA), #40, #39, #44, #37, #42, #43, #41] - ENQUIRY (#41)
PINOCCHIO'S PARADOX IN NOTING THAT THE PAPAL COMMENTS OF EUROPEAN
DISCOURSE ECHOING HITLER IS ANALOGOUS TO #1934 - CONSUMING THE #1827 - EUCHARIST IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL CALENDAR
#1934 as [#2, #10, #2, #100, #800, #200, #20, #800] = bibrṓskō (G977): {UMBRA: #0 as #1934 % #41 = #7} 1) *TO* *EAT*;
#207 as [#200, #7] = râz (H7328): {UMBRA: #55 as #207 % #41 = #2} 1) *SECRET*;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #207 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#2); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#14); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#71); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#84
- I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84 - *EAR*
H7328@{
@1: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#38); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#38),
@2: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#83); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#45 - I
AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #83; Feme: #45
} // #207
#207 as [#2, #200, #5] = bârâh (H1262): {UMBRA: #12 as #207 % #41 = #2}
1) *TO* *EAT*, *CONSUME*; 1a) (Qal) to eat; 1b) (Piel) for eating,
devouring; 1c) (Hiphil) to cause to eat;
#TWO: [#38 - IMPROPER PRE ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018 *WREATH* *PLACEMENT* ON
8 JUNE 2017, #45 - GREATNESS (TA), #40, #39, #44, #37, #42, #43, #41] - CONTRADICTION (#82)
[#38, {@1: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#38); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
(#38)}
#45, {@2: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#40); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#83)} #40, {@3: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#82); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#123)}
#39, {@4: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#163); Ego: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU
(#162)}
#44, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#207 as [#5, #2, #200] = hâbar (H1895): {UMBRA: #21 as #207 % #41 = #2} 1) (Qal) *TO* *DIVIDE*; 1a) *BE* *AN* *ASTROLOGER* (*WITH* *OBJECT* - *HEAVENS*)); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#206)} #37, {@6: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#288: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION
13); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#243)}
#42, {@7: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#330: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
SECTION 43); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#285: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
SECTION 12)}
#43, {@8: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#334: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 46);
Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#328: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 40)}
#41] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#379: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#369: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)}
#207 - ASTROLOGY / CLAIRVOYANTS / NUMEROLOGY / PSYCHIC EXPO 18 SEPTEMBER
2017
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170918%201151%20-%201.JPG> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170918%201151%20-%202.JPG> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170918%201253%20-%201.JPG> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170918%201253%20-%202.JPG> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170918%201253%20-%203.JPG>
[IMAGE: RAINBOWS / WOMANHOOD @ 1253 HOURS (BOTTOM) ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2017 AND BY #332 - SITTING UPON AS DESECRATION OF THE ANZAC CENOTAPH @
1151 HOURS (TOP) AT #207 - ASTROLOGY / CLAIRVOYANTS / NUMEROLOGY /
PSYCHIC EXPO AS *HOSTILE* *MALE* *ENCOUNTER* *AND* *CONCERNED* *WITH* *PHOTOGRAPH* *OF* *CHILDREN* *BEING* *THEN* *IMPETUS* *FOR*
*PROCREATIONAL* *VALUE* *REMOVAL* *FROM* *THE* *RETURNED* *SERVICES*
*LEAGUE* (RSL) *MURAL* *THE* *SELF* *SAME* *DAY*]
JEREMY KASPER @ 1253 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2017: "What do you think so
far?"
DOLF @ 1253 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2017: "It's a great tribute to fascist idealism but what about women's emancipation."
JEREMY KASPER @ 1253 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2017: "Go away as you are
just being rude."
YOUTUBE: "James Blunt (Wisemen)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cueB7j4ZGrM>
DOLF @ 1253 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2017: "I've published my dissertation
as reasoned opposition and these photographs now will be included.
It is you who are being entirely disparaging and if you have any
reasonable explanation I would like to hear it."
Some other fundamental propositions that geometers presuppose are indeed actually analytic and rest on the principle of *CONTRADICTION* {#312 as
[#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {#9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) *OPPOSITION*, *CONTRARINESS*, *ENCOUNTER*, *CONTRARY* *OR* *HOSTILE* *ENCOUNTER*}; however, they serve only, like identical propositions, as
links in the chain of method and not as principles: e.g., a = a, the
whole is equal to itself, or (a + b) > a, that is, the whole is greater
than its part. And indeed even these, al- though they are valid from
concepts alone, are admitted into mathematics only because they can be exhibited in intuition.
#272 as [#1, #80, #70, #100, #10, #1, #10] = aporía (G640): {UMBRA: #262 % #41 = #16} 1) *THE* *STATE* *OF* *ONE* *WHO* *IS* *IN* *PERPLEXITY*;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #262 % #41 = #16 - Being a Guide, Returning to the Root; I-Ching:
H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the
great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure;
THOTH MEASURE: #16 - Oh thou who turnest backwards, who makest thine appearance in Bubastis; I am not an eaves-dropper. #VIRTUE: Contact
(no. #16) means mutual compliance. #TOOLS: Closed Mouth (no. #56) means no contact. #POSITION: With Increase (no. #13), daily additions, but #TIME: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily reductions. #CANON: #140
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{ @1: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#16); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#16), @2: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#88); Ego: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#72), @3: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#92); Ego: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#85), @4: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#151); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}), Male: #151; Feme: #140 } // #140
G640@{
@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),
@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#82); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#81),
@3: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#152); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#151),
@4: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#160); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#170),
@5: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#178); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
@6: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@7: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#226); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #226; Feme: #191
} // #272
"And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars;
and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity {#272 as [#1,
#80, #70, #100, #10, #1, #10] = aporia (G640): perplexity}; the sea and
the waves roaring;" [Luke 21:25 (KJV)]
It is *MERELY* *AMBIGUITY* *OF* *EXPRESSION* which makes us commonly
believe here that the predicate of such apodictic judgments already lies
in our concept and that the judgment is therefore analytic. Namely, we
are required to add in thought a particular predicate to a given
concept, and this necessity is already attached to the concepts. But the question is not, what we are required to add in thought to a given
concept, but *WHAT* *WE* *ACTUALLY* *THINK* *IN* *IT*, *EVEN* *IF*
*ONLY* *OBSCURELY*, and then it becomes evident that the predicate
attaches to such concepts indeed necessarily, though not immediately,
but rather through an intuition that has to be added. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS
IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA @272]
The essential feature of pure mathematical cognition, differentiating it
from all other a priori cognition, is that it must throughout proceed
not from concepts, but always and only through the construction of
concepts (Critique, p. 713). Because pure mathematical cognition, in its propositions, must therefore go beyond the concept to that which is
contained in the intuition corresponding to it, its propositions can and
must never arise through the analysis of concepts, that is,
analytically, and so are one and all synthetic.
#273 as [#30, #10, #5, #6, #10, #200, #10, #2] = Yᵉhôwyârîyb (H3080): {UMBRA: #243 % #41 = #38} 0) Jehoiarib = 'Jehovah contends'; 1) A priest
in Jerusalem; 2) the head of the 1st of the 24 *COURSES* *OF* *PRIESTS*
in David's time;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #243 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; I curse not a god. #VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but #TOOLS: On the Verge
(no. #78) means old age. #POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant relatives. #TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood. #CANON: #220 ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{ @1: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#38); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#38), @2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#73); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#116), @3: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#142); Ego: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}), @4: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}), Male: #200; Feme: #220 } // #220
H3080@{
@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 91:56:23 |
Calls: | 6,498 |
Calls today: | 9 |
Files: | 12,100 |
Messages: | 5,277,846 |