[continued from previous message]

my new monotheistic religion are now sufficient. So you have to follow
the laws of my new monotheistic religion so that God rewards you, and i
will speak about the reward from God in my next post, so i invite you to
notice how i am smartly extracting the laws from the characteristics of
God or the nature of God or the essence of God, so read my following
thoughts of my laws carefully:

More philosophy about the laws of my new monotheistic religion..

Sorry i have just forgotten one of the laws of my new monotheistic
religion, so read again and notice how the laws are extracted from the characteristics of God or from His essence or His nature:

More philosophy of how i am smart as a prophet from God..

I am your new prophet that is smart, and we can ask a philosophical
question of how i am smart ?

Here is my answer:

My new monotheistic religion is flexible, since first i am showing as a
prophet from God how i am extracting the laws of God from His
characteristics or essence or nature, second i am showing you that
previous monotheistic religions are using many kind of languages, like
a symbolic language that is not truth to strenghten the faith in God or
a language that comes from the curse from God etc., and notice how i am
saying that i am your new prophet that is here to reduce much more the
curse from God, so as you are noticing this is showing that my new
monotheistic religion comes with like the right flexibility or like the
right tolerance, also notice how i am extracting the laws from the characteristics of God or the nature of God or the essence of God, so
here is how i am extracting the laws, read the following to notice my smartness:

First law of my new monotheistic religion is the following:

My new monotheistic religion is not darkness, since in my new
monotheistic religion God has the following characteristics:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

My above abstraction of God is so important, since even if God is not
like Love in my new monotheistic religion, notice that he is a greatly
arrogant God, and from this great arrogance of God we can logically
infer that God doesn't like a kind of arrogance of others, so then we
can logically infer from it that we have to know how to help others and
to Love others and be righteous with others by not being arrogance or a
kind of arrogance that doesn't like God.

Second law of my monotheistic religion is the following:

More philosophy about the way to communicate with God in my new
monotheistic religion..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that you have to understand
prophet Muhammad, because in my new monotheistic religion he is truly
a prophet from God, so notice that here are the characteristics of God
in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So then from the above characteristics of God, you have to be an
"effort" of being "clean" or "much" more clean when you communicate with
God, but you have to understand much more God, since when you adhere to
my new monotheistic religion you will start at level 0, but at level 0
you have to be decently "presentable" when you communicate with God
by glorifying Him and say to Him that he is so beautiful etc. but
after this first level you can go to the other superior levels by being
better and better presentable than decently presentable in front of God
in your day to day life.

Third law of my new monotheistic religion is the following:

More philosophy about the characteristics of God..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say since God is like a perfect
God, so we can ask a philosophical question of does God love smart people ?

In my new monotheistic religion, God doesn't like human smartness since
he is like a perfect God, so he is so powerful, but God can love the
fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions
in the way of God, so then God can be curious like a human and wanting
to look at humans and he can love the fact that a human is surpassing of himself with smartness and/or actions in the way of God, so i think that
with the other engines below logically inferred from the characteristics
of God, this is an engine that pushes us forward towards more and more perfection.

Fourth law of my new monotheistic religion that brings more precision is
the following:

More philosophy about purity of God and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and i say that God is like "pure", i
mean he is also pure from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically",
and he is like "perfect", so it is yet one more characteristic of God,
read the other characteristics of God in my below thoughts, so here is
the essence or nature of God in my new monotheistic religion:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

So from this we can also logically infer the way of communicating with
God, since from those above characteristics of God we can logically
infer that when you communicate with God, you have to believe in Him and
you have to glorify him, and fear Him and ask Him for help, and you have
to be a beautiful patience with God and you have to be "presentable" in
front of Him when you communicate with Him, i mean that you have to be
an effort of being decently "clean" or "much" more clean when you
communicate with God, since God is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define
dirt "symbolically", and also you have to be beautiful patience with God
since he is greatly arrogant, this is how you must behave with God in my
new monotheistic religion.

My new monotheistic religion is not darkness, since in my new
monotheistic religion God has the following characteristics:

1- He is a great God
2- He is a greatly arrogant God
3- He is like a perfect God
4- He is "pure" from "dirt" and i also define dirt "symbolically".

My above abstraction of God is so important, since even if God is not
like Love in my new monotheistic religion, notice that he is a greatly
arrogant God, and from this great arrogance of God we can logically
infer that God doesn't like a kind of arrogance of others, so then we
can logically infer from it that we have to know how to help others and
to Love others and be righteous with others by not being arrogance or a
kind of arrogance that doesn't like God.

More philosophy about what kind of game is playing with us God ?

I am your new prophet from God, and i am here to explain,
so what kind of game is playing with us God ? so when you are stupid
you will think that Islam is stupid or you will say such a thing as
prophet Muhammad is not a prophet from God, but i think this kind of
thinking is stupidity, because you have first to know about the nature
or essence of God, so when you know about his nature or about his
essence you will become much more careful and you will not say stupid
things on Islam, this is why i am explaining to you Islam , by saying
that the nature of God is that he is also greatly arrogant, so you have
to understand it correctly, so he can with his great arrogance be
indifferent to suffering of poor animals or indifferent to suffering of
humans or such things, so you have to understand that God is greatly
arrogant and he can be "dangerous" with His great arrogance, and he is
not like Love, so you have not to wait for Love from God, since you have
to believe in Him and glorify Him and fear Him and ask Him for help and
be a beautiful patience with God, but there is some limitations that you
have to understand, such as Islam is not a timeless religion, so God has
just wanted by Islam to also strenghten faith in Him and he has
programmed prophet Muhammad to use many kinds of languages, like using a symbolic language that is not the truth (read my below thoughts so that
to understand) , and God has programmed prophet Muhammad to say that he
is the last prophet, but it is not truth since it is part of the curse
from God and it also comes from his great arrogance, so you have to be
really smart and know about what kind of game is playing with us God.

More philosophy about the different conceptions of God..

I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called national vanguard about God:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/08/gods-plan-for-our-kind-alone/

I think i am a smart prophet from God and i am called the reformer of
previous monotheistic religions, and i think that the above conception
of God of white supremacists and neo-nazis is not the right and correct
one, i think that white supremacists and neo-nazis are too much egoistic
and too much selfish, that means they are lacking consideration for
other groups of humans, this is why they are defining God as they are
defining it in the above article, so we have not to accept this
corruption of the minds of white supremacists and neo-nazis, since there
is an inherent rule in my new monotheistic religion and it is that
my new monotheistic religion believes in Jesus Christ and the previous
prophets from God and we notice that even Jesus Christ and the previous prophets from God were showing the way of helping others and being
compassion with others, and this is an important inherent rule in my new monotheistic religion. So i invite you to read about my new monotheistic religion in my below thoughts:

More precision of my philosophy about the monotheistic religions and more..

I think i am smart, and i am your new prophet from God, and here is
an important question:

Do the many logical contradictions in the previous monotheistic
religions make us again free from faith in God and from previous
monotheistic religions and is it good or not ?

This is one of the most important question, since i think that previous monotheistic religions will not survive because of there many logical contradictions and this is the most important problem, and it is the
question that is answering my new monotheistic religion, since my new monotheistic religion is smart and you have to read it carefully so that
you notice how i am smartly strenghtening the faith in God and how i am
smartly making you understand my new monotheistic religion, since i
think that my new monotheistic religion is an advanced monotheistic
religion and it is a futuristic monotheistic religion that makes the
good balance that is required between cooperation and competition and
between the good balance of what we call Al-Insān al-kāmil in arabic or
the perfect man in english that must be a well balance between being of
both divine from God and of earthly origin, and of course my new
monotheistic religion says that God has not created our universe or the multiverse, and it explains clearly the why and it makes you understand
more, so i invite you to read carefully my thoughts of my new
monotheistic religion in the following link(it is my preliminary
thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them
a pdf and html book), here is the link and read my thoughts of my new monotheistic religion carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is:

And you can read about the laws of my new monoteistic religion
that i derive from the nature of God etc. in the following link
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/pDWvOh4_4zI

More of my philosophy about economy and about president Erdogan and
about Islam and more..

I invite you to read the following article about president Erdogan:

Lira plunges again after Erdogan cites Islam to defend rate cuts

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20211220-lira-plunges-again-after-erdogan-cites-islam-to-defend-rate-cuts

And notice carefully that it says the following:

"Islamic teachings forbid Muslims from receiving or charging interest on
loaned or borrowed money."

But in conventional economic theory, rising interest rates is also a
mechanism that permits the fight high inflation, so i think
that Erdogan is not right since i say that Islam is not understood
correctly by muslims, and i think that the Islamic teaching that forbids Muslims from receiving or charging interest on loaned or borrowed money
is a not timeless law, and here is how my new monotheistic religion is explaining Islam by making you understand the how there is timeless and
not timeless laws in Islam:

So i will ask a philosophical question of:

How can you make Islam a much better monotheistic religion ?

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to first to prove that
the Qur'an is not timeless, so i am smart and it is how i am doing it,
since i am proving and showing that there is in the Qur'an the timeless
laws of God and there is in the Qur'an the not timeless laws of God,
and i think that from those not timeless laws of God we can make
Islam a much better religion, and i invite you to read my following
thoughts so that to know how i am doing it:

More of my philosophy about what is Islam..

I am your new prophet from God, and i am called the reformer of
monotheistic religions, and you have to read about my new monotheistic
religion in my below thoughts, but today i will ask a question that is
also philosophical and it is the following:

What is Islam ?

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will say that there is two
types of laws of God, there is the timeless ones and not the timeless
ones, and i am explaining it to you below so that you understand it, so
the most important timeless laws of God are those of: Believing in God
and glorifying him and praying him and fear him and ask him for help,
and from those timeless laws you can derive the other human laws that
are not timeless, also when you look at my below new monotheistic
religion you will notice that it is the same but i am also deriving the
laws of God from the nature and essence of God, read below about my new monotheistic religion so that you understand that it is smart.

More of my philosophy about Salafism and more..

I am your new prophet from God, and as you have just noticed that i have
just explained to you the two types of Islamic laws so that you
understand that there is Islamic laws from the Qur'an that are not timeless(read below about them), and here is more logical proof from my following thoughts about Salafism:

So i will first invite you to look at the following video about Salafism
in Europe:

Bosnia-Hercegovina: Islamists in Sarajevo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oeSAoD6iU

So as you are noticing in the above video, that it shows islamists
Salafists in Bosnia-Hercegovina, but the most important question is the following:

Is Salafism true Islam ?

I think i am a smart prophet from God, and i will answer the question as
the following:

First we have to ask if the Qur'an is timeless ?

So my smart answer is the following:

The Qur'an is not timeless because read the following verse of
the Qur'an:

Quranic verse 5:38: "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her
hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and
Allah is Exalted in power."

So if you are smart you will notice that the above verse of the Qur'an
shows that the Qur'an is not timeless, since how can you imagine that
the Qur'an doesn't enumerate the cases where we can be compassion on a
thief and not cut his hands? so since it doesn't enumerate the cases, so
then you are noticing that this verse of the Qur'an shows that the verse
is not a timeless law, but it is a law that was applied in the context
of the time where prophet Muhammad was living or such context, so then
we can logically infer that the Qur'an is not timeless and then we can
say that we can enhance many the laws of the Qur'an, so then Salafism is
not true Islam since it says that the Qur'an and the laws of the Qur'an
are timeless.

I am your new prophet from God, and i invite you to look at the
following video:

A lady listens to lecture on Islam, then challenged me: 'Why is the
Shariah Law so Barbaric?'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tplpm24CA

So as you notice that the lady asked why in Islam the Shariah Law is so Barbaric, and i think she is not understanding as muslims are not understanding, but i am your new prophet from God and i am explaining
the following so that you understand:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.

I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.

More of my philosophy about gays in Islam..

I am your new prophet from God, and i think i am smart, so i invite you
to look at the following video about gays in Islam:

CAN I BE GAY & A MUSLIM? - FASTEST REPLY ON YOUTBE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sRTzaTuaIA

I am noticing that the above video is saying that being gay including
the practice of being gay is haram in Islam, that means it is forbiden
in Islam, and i think that this sort of Islam is not right, and i am
your new prophet from God and i will explain to you Islam so that you understand:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.

I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic
laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can
change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a
society.

More of my philosophy about Taliban and Islam..

I invite you to look at the following new video about Taliban:

Millions of desperate Afghans flee Taliban country ruled by war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpJnn2KLXw4

I am your new prophet from God and you can read carefully about my new monotheistic religion in my thoughts below, and i have just noticed in
the video above that a seignor minister in the Taliban government is
talking to a white European journalist, but i have just noticed that he
is not well educated, so i don't think that Taliban are following the
rules of Islam since they are not well educated or correctly educated,
second, in Islam you have first to be Islamic democracy so that
to have different point views of Islamic political parties with less or
more perfect ideas that permit Islam to advance correctly, so look for
example at Islamic Iran, In Iran it is an Islamic democracy with
different islamic political parties and with an islamic guide that we
call Sayyid Ali Hosseini
Khamenei(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei), so then Islamic
Iran is a better Islamic governance than Taliban that is dictatorship,
third, i also say that in Islam you have to know how to strengthen the
faith in God, since without faith in God there is no muslim, so then you
have to distinguish between the weak faith and the strong faith, since a
weak faith in God can not be called a muslim, so then certain laws of
Islam don't apply to humans that have a weak faith in God, so i say that
before applying those certain laws of Islam to a human, you have to ask
the human if he has a weak faith in God so that to distinguish and say
that he is not a muslim, and then certain laws don't apply to him.


More of my philosophy about making paper from trees and about
deforestation and more..

I invite you to read the following article about the environmental
footprint of paper vs. electronic books:

https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2020/08/the-environmental-footprint-of-paper-vs-electronic-books/

And as you notice that the above article is just speaking about
how much green house emissions we have with footprint of paper vs.
electronic books, but i think that deforestation does not only
cause green house emissions, but i think we have to take into account
the the other following disadvantages:

The disadvantages to deforestation are an increased amount of carbon
dioxide emissions and soil erosion as well as the destruction of forest
habitat and the loss of biological diversity of both plants and animals.

Also 24 trees makes around one ton of paper, which is about around
200,000 sheets, and you may use a piece of paper one or two times, but
it can be recycled five to seven times. Recycling one ton of paper saves
17 trees. If it’s recycled seven times, it saves 117 trees, but i think
that it is not enough and it is not enough to recycle (Read in the
following article so that to notice it: https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-recycling-paper-bad-for-the-environment/),
so it is why i think that reading digital or electronic books on
computers is better than using paper books, and of course i am actually programming with HTML and CSS and Javascript so that to easy the job of creating a sophisticated digital or electronic books with HTML and CSS
and Javascript with dynamically configurable HTML and CSS fonts.

And i invite you to read the following articles:

How Useful Is Recycling, Really?

Read more here:

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/01/recycling-wont-solve-climate-change/617851/

How do people make paper out of trees, and why not use something else?

Read more here:

https://theconversation.com/how-do-people-make-paper-out-of-trees-and-why-not-use-something-else-156625


Your Web Use Leaves A Carbon Footprint, Here's How You Can Reduce It

Read more here:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilyeoh/2017/07/26/your-web-use-leaves-a-carbon-footprint-heres-how-you-can-reduce-it/?sh=414bea159401


More of my philosophy about relativism and about morality and more..

I have just read the following article of white supremacists and
neo-nazis of a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:

Ancient Admixture: Death Blow to Racialism? — part 1

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/12/ancient-admixture-death-blow-to-racialism-part-1/


So notice carefully on the above article how it is starting by saying:

"And some of these discoveries do undermine old-fashioned racialism. But
they do not undermine the higher racialism — the true understanding —
held by us in the National Alliance.."

So notice how it is saying:

"The true understanding — held by us in the National Alliance"

So as you are noticing it is not correct thinking, since I will say that "relativism" is a major disruptor of our mental immune system, but
objective standards of right and wrong are our main defences against bad
ideas. If we lose those standards, then anything goes, so this is why i
say that saying in the above article of white supremacists: "the true understanding held by us in the National Alliance..." is too much
certainty, since by reading the above article you will notice that it
tries to prove that there is human genetical differences between ethnic
groups like the ethnic groups of white and blacks etc., but notice that
i am not saying races, since there is only one human race called the
human race, but notice carefully that the above certainty of those white supremacists doesn't understand correctly how to introduce the right "randomness" like in Evolutionary algorithms so that to not get stuck in
a local minimum and so that to converge towards the global optimum, so i
think that this randomness like in Evolutionary algorithms that must be introduced is also allowing a certain level of Genetic mixture to happen
inside a group or population, like 25% or so, like allowing Genetic
mixture between arabs and white europeans etc. so that to ensure a kind
of "diversity" that ensures genetical resilience or resilience. So this
why i just said the following:

I think i am a wise type of person, and from my thoughts below about
morality, i will say that morality is like mathematics, since morality
is universal as i am explaining below, but so that to be this
abstraction of morality that i call "perfection at best", it must be
thought really efficiently systemically, so then you notice that it must
come with a kind of right patience or right tolerance so that to not be mistakes in the process codification of morality, so morality is in
abstraction universal, but so that to be universal in reality it must be thought really efficiently and systemically.

Also the white supremacists and others have to take into account my
following thoughts so that to understand correctly:

And read carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress and about genetics:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

And read my following thoughts:

More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Class Struggle and more..

Today i will discuss more about an important subject, so first i invite
you to read my following previous thoughts:

--

"Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we are genetically predisposed to being smart
or having a good memory efficiency etc. so this gives much more "chance"
to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich
and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have
to equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also
a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will
say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society
is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind Social Assistance and Social
Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help
the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind
of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing
some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and the
poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such
places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other
antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under
Democracy or the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside
a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have
to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions."

--

So as you are noticing in my above thoughts that i just said the following:

"But i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people
in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it is
not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that
brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in
economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that
brings resilience"

And here is how i will explain it more, look at Financial sector,
so you can understand more capitalism and the mechanism of diversity
that brings "resilience" and that needs a good allocation of resources
in capitalism by reading my following thoughts:

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,
in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to
start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In
a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually
start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved
the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you
create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take
advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a
good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation. But we have to
know what is the problem with finance, and here it is, read the
following so that to understand:

One last chance to fix capitalism

Read more here:

https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism

So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:

How to Improve Capitalism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU

So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by
giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and
not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and
national pension funds representative of the long term collective
interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to
improve capitalism" so that to understand more.

And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
read them here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc


More of my philosophy about the "assets" of the central Bank of European
Union and more..

I have just looked at the following video of Olivier Berruyer , born on
October 26 , 1975 in Bron that is a French blogger and actuary by
profession, and you can read about him more here:

https://fr-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Olivier_Berruyer?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en

And here is the video of him:


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)