Hello...


More of my philosophy about philosophy and politics and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am a wise type of person, and i am a man of laws, i mean
that i love to think and invent my philosophy and after that to
logically infer laws and rules from it, and from what i am doing i am
noticing that my kind of doing philosophy is also like how to make work Democracy, since i think that Democracy needs to avoid extremism that
hurts Democracy and make it not work correctly, this is how i am doing
my philosophy, since the rules or laws that i am inferring from my
philosophy have to be not too much "homogenized" static laws in a
society, so it is like in Evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, i mean my laws have to avoid extremism that hurts the laws themselves and make them unhealthy, this is why i am also like
introducing randomness in my laws like in Evolutionary algorithms by
making my laws efficiently flexible and efficiently "adaptative", so
when for example you say that the rule or law of Utilitarianism is
maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, it is
not a static law that you have to homogenize in a society, since you
have to see it or look at it like a dynamic law that is efficiently
flexible and adaptative to the envirenment or the context.

More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more..

I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand
another very important thing, and it is that my redefinition of
Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true",
since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and
well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to
be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so
then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical
analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not
to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is
also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i
think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial
intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in
Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about
the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my
redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of
Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my
redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again:

More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more..

So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what
is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it
below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about
this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that
Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being
for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like "recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule
of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and
you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that
abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

And read my following other proverbs that i think are flexible from the
start and that i have just invented quickly, here they are and read them carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

More of my philosophy of from where comes the positive human energy..

I think i am a wise type of person, and i will say that the positive
energy that makes us be a much better world comes from the way you are
moving, so you have to be careful about the way you are moving, so i
think that the efficient way of moving is that you have to make
your personality better and better by making or constructing better and
better things, and i think that it is the best positive energy that
makes us be a much better world, it is why i am talking as i am talking
so that to make you better "adapt" and be better and better humans, and
this is why i have also invented the following proverb that abstract
much more correctly this way of doing by positive energy, here it is:

And here is my new proverb in french and english:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."


More of my philosophy about adaptation and more..

I think that we have not to be inefficient, and i will give you like the general way with an example of how it is to to be inefficient, so look
for example at a prisonier or prisoniers, so you will notice that those prisoniers have the "tendency" to speak about there human conditions
inside the prison, and they will have the tendency to complain about
there human conditions as prisoniers, but i think that it is the
inefficient way of doing, since the wise man will say that the efficient
way for those prisoniers is that they have to "adapt" efficiently and
not be enter again the prison as a prisonier, so i think it is the
general way that says that you have to solve the "causes" of the problem
and not to waste too much of your time with the consequences of the
problem, this is why the best way to adapt is also to be well educated
and to know how to be an efficient soft power and this why also i am
talking as i am talking in my thoughts below so that to also make you understand the mechanism of adaptation:

More of my philosophy about wisdom and more..

I think i am a wise type of person, and i will give you a very important
basis of what is wisdom that has a great weight of importance, and it is related to soft power and hard power, so i will say that hard power has
limits or constraints that soft power has to solve or to transcend, so a
wise man like me will also give great importance to soft power and i
will say that one of the important basis of wisdom, that has
a great weight of importance, is also that a wise man knows that it is
that you have to know how to make from a negative energy a positive
energy that propulse towards a much better world, and i think it is one
of the important speciality of a wise man, so it is why you will notice
that i have also invented quickly my following proverb that also
explains how you will start to do it:

And here is my other smart proverb:

"One very important sign of a wise man is that he knows how to use the appropriate language to talk to people, but does he needs to use only
one language with "people"? no, he has to know how to use different
languages to talk to people, for example when he talks to the birds he
uses the language of the birds, so he has to know how to be efficient at
that."

So notice that it is a smart proverb, since i am also saying in my new
proverb the following:

"..for example when he talks to the birds he uses the language of the
birds.."

So as you notice that it is also making it clear that a language
is not only like the spoken english language, since it can also mean the language of the heart(or of Love) or the language of technicality etc."

More of my philosophy about what is to be a wise man and more..

I think i am a wise type of man and i will say the following:

So when you look at a prophet from God, so a prophet from God can for
example talk to the birds, but i am a wise type of person and i will say
that when you are a wise man you will know how to talk with "darkness",
so it is as darkness will teach the wise man the good way towards a much
better lightness, so darkness, for the wise man, is a "mechanism" that
brings the positive energy that propulse the wise man high towards a
much better world and towards a much better lightness and that make him construct a much better world with a much better lightness, so a wise
man is always a such positiveness that wants to construct from darkness
a much better world and a much better lightness. So i think i am a wise
type of person and i will invite you to read my following new proverb
so that to see the kind of my wisdom that talks about darkness and
lightness:

And here is my new proverb in french and english:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world.

More of my philosophy about the Talion law and more about my new
monotheistic religion and more..

I am your new prophet from God and you can read about my new
monotheistic religion below, and now i will talk about the Talion law:

I think that the Talion law(Eye for an eye) in Islam is different, since
i think that you have not to fear Islam when you understand it deeply,
since i am also explaining more in my thoughts below Islam so that you understand it correctly, and in Islam you have to use your brain, that
means in Arabic that in Islam: "Yajibu alayka an tassta3mila 3aqloka",
that means that you have to know how to "balance" correctly and not be
too blind as Nazism or neo-nazism, since you have to know that for
example there is in politics what we call soft power and there is hard
power, but when you are smart and wise you will realize that soft power
is also really powerful and you have to know how to use it efficiently
by efficiently minimizing at best violence against innocent people, this
is why you are noticing that i am using soft power by talking as i am
talking in my thoughts below, and as you are noticing i am
not insulting the secret institutions that have tortured me or
mistreated me, since what i want to do is to use soft power
so that to explain my kind of philosophy and my kind of personality
in a form of my thoughts below, and of course you have to notice
that i have also made you understand my new monotheistic religion,
and here is the main architectural ideas of my new monotheistic religion
and read my following thoughts about it more:

More of my philosophy of why my new monotheistic religion is an advanced monotheistic religion..

I think i am smart, so i will explain more the architectural ideas of my
new monotheistic religion, the first smart architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion, it is that it says that the previous monotheistic religions are not safe from the curse from God, since those many
contradictions and scientific errors in the previous monotheistic
religions are part of the curse from God, and i am giving you some
examples from the Bible etc. of it so that you see it clearly, but this
is not sufficient to render the new monotheistic religion flexible and
not rigid as the previous monotheistic religions, so then what is
missing ? so one of the most important thing is to notice that there is
two kinds of laws in the Qu'raan or the Bible, there is the laws that
are timeless and the laws that are not timeless, read my below thoughts
about them, so then you are much more clearly noticing that this second architectural idea of my new monotheistic religion makes the new
monotheistic religion much more flexible, but it is not the only thing
that i am doing, but i am also explaining more Islam by showing the
problem with Islam and Christianity and Judaism and why they are too
much rigid as neo-nazism or white supremacism, this why they also can
not survive and they are not advanced monotheistic religions as my
monotheistic religion, and of course one of the most important thing to
also notice is how i am deriving the laws of my monotheistic religion
from the essence of God or the nature of God, so i invite you to read my
below thoughts about my new monotheitic religion so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about my IQ and about some secret institutions..

Even if those secret institutions have made me more smart or less smart
from a long distance, i have passed two IQ certified tests in around
year 1998 before they have started to torture me and mistreated me, and
i have scored high on those IQ tests in year 1998, so i think i am smart
and this is why i have also invented many interesting scalable
algorithms and algorithms, and those institutions are no more torturing
me now, and they are just mistreating me a little bit from a long
distance, since i think that they have noticed that i am a "wise" type
of person and i am a smart person and i am gentleman type of person.

More of my philosophy about some secret institutions and about my new monotheistic religion and more..

I am your new prophet from God and i am talking below about my new
monotheistic religion, but today i will talk about a very important
subject and it is that some secret institutions have tortured and
mistreated me with advanced technologies from a long distance from year
2001, and i have noticed that they have attained a level of advancement
that is impressive, and i have noticed that they have now a power that
looks like a power from a God, since they have from a long distance
made like instantly my body old and made again my body younger and they
have changed the structure of my brain by making me more smart or less
smart and they can wake up and make live someone that has just died and
i have also noticed that they have a very advanced artificial
intelligence that is much more smart than humans etc., so i have thought
about how those secret institutions have attained this level of
sophistication and here is my answer:

I think that those secret institutions have understood the following mechanisms, look at the following videos carefully so that to notice it:

Third Eye Spies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1VX_W32mNM

5th Dimension - Mind over Matter (Telekinesis)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jgMzcRxxEE&t=337s

Reportage : Ils ont des Pouvoirs Extraordinaires (Dossiers Surnaturels)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-tL0GkQ8CE


So notice that the building blocks of such advancement of those secret institutions is on the above videos, since look at the french video
above that shows that a human with Telekinesis can change the low level molecular structure constituted with protons and neutrons and such , so
i think that those secret institutions have reverse engineered and
understood how the humans with Telekinesis can do such thing "rapidly",
and from the law of conservation of mass, which in France is taught as Lavoisier's Law, is paraphrased in the phrase "Rien ne se perd, rien ne
se crée, tout se transforme." ("Nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is transformed."), we can notice that the after those secret institutions they have understood the process they have started to
reverse engineer and understand the brain and the body from the low
level layer of molecules and protons and neutrons and such by reverse engineering and understand the methology of remote viewing of the above
video called "Third Eye Spies" that permits to reverse engineer and
understand the brain and the body etc. from the low level layers, so
today those secret institutions are able to construct a body from the
low level layers of molecules and protons and neutrons and such, and
after that i think
that they have been able to advance really quickly on science and
technology, this is how those secret institutions are are able to be
powerful as a God, by making my body instantly older or younger or making
my brain smarter etc.


More of my philosophy about my new proverb about Democracy and more..

As you have just noticed, i have just invented a proverb about
Democracy, read it below and read all my other proverbs below, and as
you notice in this new proverb that i am saying:

"Since the basis of Democracy is to better and better discuss so that to
bring good sageness and good soundness"

So this "better and better discuss" means that it is "inherent" to it
that we have to also be well educated and that it needs Elitism, and as
you are noticing in my new proverb that i am saying that Democracy needs Elitism that is existence of an elite as a dominating element in a
system or society such as congressmen and congresswomen of the USA
congress. So i invite you to read my new proverb and all my following
thoughts so that to understand:

Here is my new proverb:

"The basis of Democracy is not that people have to govern, since it is inferiority of Democracy, since the basis of Democracy is to better and
better discuss so that to bring good sageness and good soundness, and
after bringing this good sageness and good soundness, we can govern
correctly with this good sageness and good soundness, this is why
Democracy needs Elitism such as the congressmen and congresswomen of the
USA congress so that to bring good sageness and good soundness."

And of course you can read my just new poem below that also speaks
about the basis of Democracy:

And read my other new proverbs below that i have written quickly..

Here is my just new poem, and notice that the lightness in
my new poem means: The state of having a sufficient or considerable
amount of natural light.


So here is my new poem:


Darkness for me is not madness

Since darkness is also a "mechanism" that brings better lightness

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is not coming just from U.S. state of Kansas

Darkness for me is not madness

Since better lightness is also coming from the USA congress

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the USA congress is also a place where to better discuss

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss is not loneliness and is not being novice

Darkness for me is not madness

Since to better discuss is also like our beautiful princess

Darkness for me is not madness

Since the better discuss brings better Sageness and better soundness


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--

More about simulation and about prediction and more..

So as you have just noticed that i just said that i have just
invented two software scalable algorithms that i think are
breakthroughs, but you have to know that one of them has needed from
me to simulate it, so i have abstracted the real world behavior
of one of this new scalable algorithms as a model that i have simulated
by software and this has permitted me to "ensure" that this new scalable algorithm of mine, that i think is a breakthrough, is "reliable" and is
working perfectly, also simulation in general also permits
to not only ensure the "reliability" but also to "predict" the behavior
of the real world systems.

More of my philosophy about the inventors and about algorithms and more..

If you ask me the following question:

What are you, Amine Moulay Ramdane, doing right now ?


I will say that the most important thing that i am doing
is that i have just today invented two software scalable
algorithms that i think are breakthroughs, but i am not
thinking too much about money since what i have done
is that i have invented many software scalable algorithms
and algorithms to better our humanity and our world, so as you notice
that my personality is also that i am an "inventor" that have invented
really interesting things. Also i am right now implementing some
interesting software projects from the ground up with artificial
intelligence, So i invite you to read all my following thoughts so that
to know more about my personality:

More of my philosophy about mathematics and the Minimizers that fit models..

I have just read the following web pages about comparing Minimizers that
fit models, and i invite you to read them here:

https://docs.mantidproject.org/v3.7.1/concepts/FittingMinimizers.html


And i am working with some software projects now that need good
Minimizers that fit models, and i have implemented two of them with the
simplex method and with Levenberg-Marquardt, but i am not satisfied
since i think that the Simplex method is better in convergence than Levenberg-Marquardt since it rarely converges to a local minimum, but i
will implement or build a minimizer from the ground up with artificial intelligence that fits Models and that is much more sophisticated and
much more efficient than the Simplex or Levenberg-Marquardt, so stay
tuned since i am actually implementing it !

More of my philosophy of how to become rich and more..

I invite you to look at the following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So he is saying the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

So look at the following how he is giving the "general" way:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare."

I think that the "defect" in the above saying and "general" way of the
above video is that it is not taking into account the factor of the
usefulness to consumers or to customers since you can acquire skills
that nobody else has, especially in combination that are rare, but those
skills can still be useless to the consumers or customers, so i think
that the above saying is not so smart. So the person on the above video
has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be useful
for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart
"redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

So you can read all my other proverbs that i have just invented quickly
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


More of my philosophy about correlation and about diversity and more..

I think i am smart, and i will say to look again at what is saying
the Ph.D Katherine W. Phillips that is the Paul Calello Professor of
Leadership and Ethics Management at Columbia Business School(Read about
her here: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/profile/katherine_phillips):

"Large data-set studies have an obvious limitation: They only show that diversity is correlated with better performance, not that it causes
better performance."

So i will say that this Ph.D and other researchers are not so smart,
since notice how is speaking the Ph.D Katherine W. Phillips in the
following article:

How Diversity Makes Us Smarter

Read more here:

https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_diversity_makes_us_smarter

So notice that she is not saying that human diversity is a "mechanism"
that can cause "competition" or more competition between people, and
then competition can be the cause of better performance, so you are
noticing that the above Ph.D and researchers are trying to measure it empirically, but i think that this kind of measuring is not a correct measuring, since what i am showing you by my way of thinking is the fact
that there is a "tendency" in human diversity that it causes competition
or more competition, so it causes better performance, so then we can
notice that by not following there way of empirical measuring we can still
know about the process. So as i said, i think this Ph.D and other
researchers are not thinking and abstracting correctly since from my
saying below we can notice that human Diversity in a global world or in
a society or in a group brings more "competition" between people, so it
makes us work harder and better cognitively and socially, but if we are
not being the right human diversity and we are working harder and better cognitively and socially, then i think being human diversity can still
"keep" or "maintain" the working harder and better cognitively and
socially, also human diversity brings different human perspectives or
views and it brings different human experiences and different human
knowledges and it is good for creativity and innovation since it is also
good for divergent thinking that enhance creativity and innovation.

More of my philosophy about USA and human diversity and more..

I just said the following:

"I think i am understanding rapidly, since i think that human Diversity
in a global world or in a society or in a group brings more
"competition" between people, so it makes us work harder and

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)